]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blob - software/RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices/2001/001327.html
rename -> *.git
[irc.git] / software / RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices / 2001 / 001327.html
1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
2 <HTML>
3 <HEAD>
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)
5 </TITLE>
6 <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
7 <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ChanServ%20OP/DEOP%20vs.%20access%20levels%20%28was%20Re%3A%20Services%204.5pre1%20released%29&In-Reply-To=">
8 <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001324.html">
11 <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001328.html">
12 </HEAD>
13 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)</H1>
15 <B>David Blanchard</B>
16 <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ChanServ%20OP/DEOP%20vs.%20access%20levels%20%28was%20Re%3A%20Services%204.5pre1%20released%29&In-Reply-To="
17 TITLE="[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)">dblanch at home.com
18 </A><BR>
19 <I>Thu Feb 1 18:31:01 PST 2001</I>
20 <P><UL>
21 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001324.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)
22 </A></li>
23 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001328.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)
24 </A></li>
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
26 <a href="date.html#1327">[ date ]</a>
27 <a href="thread.html#1327">[ thread ]</a>
28 <a href="subject.html#1327">[ subject ]</a>
29 <a href="author.html#1327">[ author ]</a>
30 </LI>
31 </UL>
32 <HR>
33 <!--beginarticle-->
34 <PRE>&gt;<i> This is something I've been thinking about: Should the OP/DEOP
35 </I>commands
36 &gt;<i> obey the access level settings or not? In other words, should someone be
37 </I>&gt;<i> able to DEOP someone else who has auto-op access for the channel or not?
38 </I>Or
39 &gt;<i> should only people with higher access levels be able to deop people with
40 </I>&gt;<i> lower access levels? How about equal access levels?
41 </I>&gt;<i>
42 </I>
43 my vote: only people with higher access levels be able to deop people with
44 lower access levels
45
46 David
47
48
49
50
51 </PRE>
52
53 <!--endarticle-->
54 <HR>
55 <P><UL>
56 <!--threads-->
57 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001324.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)
58 </A></li>
59 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001328.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)
60 </A></li>
61 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
62 <a href="date.html#1327">[ date ]</a>
63 <a href="thread.html#1327">[ thread ]</a>
64 <a href="subject.html#1327">[ subject ]</a>
65 <a href="author.html#1327">[ author ]</a>
66 </LI>
67 </UL>
68
69 </body></html>