]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
3bd189cb JR |
1 | <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> |
2 | <HTML> | |
3 | <HEAD> | |
4 | <TITLE> [IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released) | |
5 | </TITLE> | |
6 | <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > | |
7 | <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ChanServ%20OP/DEOP%20vs.%20access%20levels%20%28was%20Re%3A%20Services%204.5pre1%20released%29&In-Reply-To="> | |
8 | <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> | |
9 | <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> | |
10 | <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001324.html"> | |
11 | <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001328.html"> | |
12 | </HEAD> | |
13 | <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> | |
14 | <H1>[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)</H1> | |
15 | <B>David Blanchard</B> | |
16 | <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ChanServ%20OP/DEOP%20vs.%20access%20levels%20%28was%20Re%3A%20Services%204.5pre1%20released%29&In-Reply-To=" | |
17 | TITLE="[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)">dblanch at home.com | |
18 | </A><BR> | |
19 | <I>Thu Feb 1 18:31:01 PST 2001</I> | |
20 | <P><UL> | |
21 | <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001324.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released) | |
22 | </A></li> | |
23 | <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001328.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released) | |
24 | </A></li> | |
25 | <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> | |
26 | <a href="date.html#1327">[ date ]</a> | |
27 | <a href="thread.html#1327">[ thread ]</a> | |
28 | <a href="subject.html#1327">[ subject ]</a> | |
29 | <a href="author.html#1327">[ author ]</a> | |
30 | </LI> | |
31 | </UL> | |
32 | <HR> | |
33 | <!--beginarticle--> | |
34 | <PRE>><i> This is something I've been thinking about: Should the OP/DEOP | |
35 | </I>commands | |
36 | ><i> obey the access level settings or not? In other words, should someone be | |
37 | </I>><i> able to DEOP someone else who has auto-op access for the channel or not? | |
38 | </I>Or | |
39 | ><i> should only people with higher access levels be able to deop people with | |
40 | </I>><i> lower access levels? How about equal access levels? | |
41 | </I>><i> | |
42 | </I> | |
43 | my vote: only people with higher access levels be able to deop people with | |
44 | lower access levels | |
45 | ||
46 | David | |
47 | ||
48 | ||
49 | ||
50 | ||
51 | </PRE> | |
52 | ||
53 | <!--endarticle--> | |
54 | <HR> | |
55 | <P><UL> | |
56 | <!--threads--> | |
57 | <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001324.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released) | |
58 | </A></li> | |
59 | <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001328.html">[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released) | |
60 | </A></li> | |
61 | <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> | |
62 | <a href="date.html#1327">[ date ]</a> | |
63 | <a href="thread.html#1327">[ thread ]</a> | |
64 | <a href="subject.html#1327">[ subject ]</a> | |
65 | <a href="author.html#1327">[ author ]</a> | |
66 | </LI> | |
67 | </UL> | |
68 | ||
69 | </body></html> |