1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
6 <LINK REL=
"Index" HREF=
"index.html" >
7 <LINK REL=
"made" HREF=
"mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20rfc%20violation%20%3F&In-Reply-To=">
8 <META NAME=
"robots" CONTENT=
"index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv=
"Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL=
"Previous" HREF=
"000316.html">
11 <LINK REL=
"Next" HREF=
"000318.html">
13 <BODY BGCOLOR=
"#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
</H1>
15 <B>Kelmar K. Firesun
</B>
16 <A HREF=
"mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20rfc%20violation%20%3F&In-Reply-To="
17 TITLE=
"[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?">kfiresun at ix.netcom.com
19 <I>Sun Feb
24 02:
14:
41 PST
2002</I>
21 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"000316.html">[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
23 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"000318.html">[IRCServices Coding] Update on unlinking bug
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
26 <a href=
"date.html#317">[ date ]
</a>
27 <a href=
"thread.html#317">[ thread ]
</a>
28 <a href=
"subject.html#317">[ subject ]
</a>
29 <a href=
"author.html#317">[ author ]
</a>
34 <PRE>----- Original Message -----
35 From:
"Thomas J. Stens
ås
" <<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices-coding">ShadowMaster at Shadow-Realm.org
</A>>
36 To:
<<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices-coding">ircservices-coding at ircservices.za.net
</A>>
37 Sent: Saturday, February
23,
2002 5:
55 PM
38 Subject: Re: [IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
41 ><i> On Saturday
23 February
2002 23:
27, you wrote:
42 </I>><i> > It's not violating the RFC dammit!
43 </I>><i> > The RFC says
"SHOULD not!
" not
"SHALL NOT!
"
49 To quote RFC
1459 (emphasis added):
51 The difference between NOTICE and PRIVMSG is
52 that automatic replies _MUST_NEVER_ be sent
53 in response to a NOTICE message.
55 This is not to say that Services are not
56 compliant with the RFC. Quite the opposite,
57 infact. Services sends the notices so that
58 the other end does _NOT_ auto-reply.
60 As Thomas pointed out: if the client choses
61 to ignore, this then it is the client that is
62 at fault, not services.
64 Kelmar K. Firesun (IRL: Bryce Simonds)
65 Acting Admin: dream.esper.net
74 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"000316.html">[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
76 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"000318.html">[IRCServices Coding] Update on unlinking bug
78 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
79 <a href=
"date.html#317">[ date ]
</a>
80 <a href=
"thread.html#317">[ thread ]
</a>
81 <a href=
"subject.html#317">[ subject ]
</a>
82 <a href=
"author.html#317">[ author ]
</a>