]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blame - software/RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices-coding/2002/000317.html
rename -> *.git
[irc.git] / software / RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices-coding / 2002 / 000317.html
CommitLineData
3bd189cb
JR
1<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
2<HTML>
3 <HEAD>
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
5 </TITLE>
6 <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
7 <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20rfc%20violation%20%3F&In-Reply-To=">
8 <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000316.html">
11 <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000318.html">
12 </HEAD>
13 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?</H1>
15 <B>Kelmar K. Firesun</B>
16 <A HREF="mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20rfc%20violation%20%3F&In-Reply-To="
17 TITLE="[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?">kfiresun at ix.netcom.com
18 </A><BR>
19 <I>Sun Feb 24 02:14:41 PST 2002</I>
20 <P><UL>
21 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000316.html">[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
22</A></li>
23 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000318.html">[IRCServices Coding] Update on unlinking bug
24</A></li>
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
26 <a href="date.html#317">[ date ]</a>
27 <a href="thread.html#317">[ thread ]</a>
28 <a href="subject.html#317">[ subject ]</a>
29 <a href="author.html#317">[ author ]</a>
30 </LI>
31 </UL>
32 <HR>
33<!--beginarticle-->
34<PRE>----- Original Message -----
35From: &quot;Thomas J. Stens&#229;s&quot; &lt;<A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices-coding">ShadowMaster at Shadow-Realm.org</A>&gt;
36To: &lt;<A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices-coding">ircservices-coding at ircservices.za.net</A>&gt;
37Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 5:55 PM
38Subject: Re: [IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
39
40
41&gt;<i> On Saturday 23 February 2002 23:27, you wrote:
42</I>&gt;<i> &gt; It's not violating the RFC dammit!
43</I>&gt;<i> &gt; The RFC says &quot;SHOULD not!&quot; not &quot;SHALL NOT!&quot;
44</I>&gt;<i>
45</I>&gt;<i> *shhhhhh*
46</I>&gt;<i> Tired =)
47</I>&gt;<i>
48</I>
49To quote RFC 1459 (emphasis added):
50
51The difference between NOTICE and PRIVMSG is
52that automatic replies _MUST_NEVER_ be sent
53in response to a NOTICE message.
54
55This is not to say that Services are not
56compliant with the RFC. Quite the opposite,
57infact. Services sends the notices so that
58the other end does _NOT_ auto-reply.
59
60As Thomas pointed out: if the client choses
61to ignore, this then it is the client that is
62at fault, not services.
63
64Kelmar K. Firesun (IRL: Bryce Simonds)
65Acting Admin: dream.esper.net
66
67
68</PRE>
69
70<!--endarticle-->
71 <HR>
72 <P><UL>
73 <!--threads-->
74 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000316.html">[IRCServices Coding] rfc violation ?
75</A></li>
76 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000318.html">[IRCServices Coding] Update on unlinking bug
77</A></li>
78 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
79 <a href="date.html#317">[ date ]</a>
80 <a href="thread.html#317">[ thread ]</a>
81 <a href="subject.html#317">[ subject ]</a>
82 <a href="author.html#317">[ author ]</a>
83 </LI>
84 </UL>
85
86</body></html>