]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blob - software/!RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices/2007/005581.html
RELEASE -> !RELEASE
[irc.git] / software / !RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices / 2007 / 005581.html
1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
2 <HTML>
3 <HEAD>
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] 4.x Database to 5.0 query
5 </TITLE>
6 <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
7 <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%204.x%20Database%20to%205.0%20query&In-Reply-To=">
8 <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005580.html">
11 <LINK REL="Next" HREF="005582.html">
12 </HEAD>
13 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] 4.x Database to 5.0 query</H1>
15 <B>Krisstoffer</B>
16 <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%204.x%20Database%20to%205.0%20query&In-Reply-To="
17 TITLE="[IRCServices] 4.x Database to 5.0 query">webmaster at ircnews.co.uk
18 </A><BR>
19 <I>Sat Dec 15 07:29:07 PST 2007</I>
20 <P><UL>
21 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005580.html">[IRCServices] Services 5.1.10 released
22 </A></li>
23 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005582.html">[IRCServices] 4.x Database to 5.0 query
24 </A></li>
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
26 <a href="date.html#5581">[ date ]</a>
27 <a href="thread.html#5581">[ thread ]</a>
28 <a href="subject.html#5581">[ subject ]</a>
29 <a href="author.html#5581">[ author ]</a>
30 </LI>
31 </UL>
32 <HR>
33 <!--beginarticle-->
34 <PRE>Greetings,
35 We're running IRC Services 4.5.45 and have been running it for quite a
36 few years now. We are looking at doing an upgrade to the 5.0 version,
37 one of the main reasons for the upgrade is to better prevent &quot;nick
38 collectors&quot;
39
40 However we are uncertain on one thing, once we set a limit on allowed
41 registered nicknames, we are uncertain what will happen to those whom
42 have say 100 nicks.
43
44 idea being setting say the allowed nicks to 10 what will happen to those
45 with 100 nicks ? we have run over a few possible theories:
46 1. it will drop there oldest nicks and retain 10 newest
47 2. it will drop there newest nicks and retain 10 oldest
48 3. it will go nuts and kill everything
49 4. it will simply retain 4.x setup and allow those with the
50 nicks to continue as they we're but with no ability to add to
51 there collection, simply keep identifying them.
52 As yet we have not managed to get a clear grasp on what the database
53 conversion will do.. any hints would be appreciated.
54 --
55 Krisstoffer &lt;<A HREF="http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">webmaster at ircnews.co.uk</A>&gt;
56 IRCNews
57
58 </PRE>
59
60
61 <!--endarticle-->
62 <HR>
63 <P><UL>
64 <!--threads-->
65 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005580.html">[IRCServices] Services 5.1.10 released
66 </A></li>
67 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005582.html">[IRCServices] 4.x Database to 5.0 query
68 </A></li>
69 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
70 <a href="date.html#5581">[ date ]</a>
71 <a href="thread.html#5581">[ thread ]</a>
72 <a href="subject.html#5581">[ subject ]</a>
73 <a href="author.html#5581">[ author ]</a>
74 </LI>
75 </UL>
76
77 </body></html>