]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blob - software/!RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices/2004.txt
RELEASE -> !RELEASE
[irc.git] / software / !RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices / 2004.txt
1 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Wed Feb 11 01:32:17 2004
2 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
3 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
4 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
5 In-Reply-To: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CF74@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
6 References: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CF74@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
7 Message-ID: <1076491937.4499.0.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
8
9 No, after that there have been
10 .24, .25, .26, .27 and now finally as of 05.02.2004
11 5.0.28 has been released.
12
13 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices
14
15 On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 03:56, Andrew G. Buenaventura wrote:
16 > I am using 5.0.23. Isn't it the latest version?
17 >
18 > Manually removing the .lock file causes services to segfault.
19 >
20 >
21 > -----Original Message-----
22 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
23 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Yusuf
24 > Iskenderoglu
25 > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:34 PM
26 > To: IRC Services General Mailing List
27 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] database locked
28 >
29 > Apart from manually removing that lock file, you must upgrade your
30 > services.
31 >
32 > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 05:20, Andrew G. Buenaventura wrote:
33 > > I am getting the following error message after almost an hour of running
34 > > ircservices 5.0.23 on unreal 3.2 beta 19:
35 > >
36 > > [12:17] -irc2.yehey.com- *** Global -- from services.yehey.com: Warning:
37 > > Databases are locked, and cannot be updated. Remove the
38 > > `/usr/local/ircservices/lib/.lock' file to allow database updates.
39 > >
40 > > What do you think is wrong?
41 > >
42 > > ______________________________________________________________________
43 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
44 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
45 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
46 >
47 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
48 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
49 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
50 >
51 > ______________________________________________________________________
52 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
53 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
54 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
55
56
57 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed Feb 11 03:50:19 2004
58 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
59 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
60 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
61 Message-ID: <200402111150.i1BBoKb19962@localhost.localdomain>
62
63 if you have a backup of your services database, have you tried reverting to it? The one you have now may have become corrupted in some way?
64
65 >I am using 5.0.23. Isn't it the latest version?
66 >
67 >Manually removing the .lock file causes services to segfault.
68 >
69 >
70 >-----Original Message-----
71 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
72 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Yusuf
73 >Iskenderoglu
74 >Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:34 PM
75 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List
76 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] database locked
77 >
78 >Apart from manually removing that lock file, you must upgrade your
79 >services.
80 >
81 >On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 05:20, Andrew G. Buenaventura wrote:
82 >> I am getting the following error message after almost an hour of running
83 >> ircservices 5.0.23 on unreal 3.2 beta 19:
84 >>
85 >> [12:17] -irc2.yehey.com- *** Global -- from services.yehey.com: Warning:
86 >> Databases are locked, and cannot be updated. Remove the
87 >> `/usr/local/ircservices/lib/.lock' file to allow database updates.
88 >>
89 >> What do you think is wrong?
90 >>
91 >> ______________________________________________________________________
92 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
93 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
94 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
95 >
96 >------------------------------------------------------------------
97 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
98 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
99 >
100 >------------------------------------------------------------------
101 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
102 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
103 >
104
105
106 From emurphy at sporked.us Wed Feb 11 11:27:15 2004
107 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric Murphy)
108 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
109 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
110 References: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CF74@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
111 <1076491937.4499.0.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
112 Message-ID: <00fe01c3f0d5$10190000$0100a8c0@sporked.us>
113
114 The confusion is probably caused by this:
115 http://www.ircservices.za.net/index.html
116 "version 5.0 (stable)
117 Current version: 5.0.23
118 Released:1 November 2003
119
120 "
121 As well as the ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ not having
122 anything over 5.0.23.
123 You can get the 5.0.28 release at ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ though.
124 ----- Original Message -----
125 From: "Yusuf Iskenderoglu" <uhc0@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
126 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
127 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:32 AM
128 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
129
130
131 > No, after that there have been
132 > .24, .25, .26, .27 and now finally as of 05.02.2004
133 > 5.0.28 has been released.
134 >
135 > ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices
136 >
137 > On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 03:56, Andrew G. Buenaventura wrote:
138 > > I am using 5.0.23. Isn't it the latest version?
139 > >
140 > > Manually removing the .lock file causes services to segfault.
141 > >
142 > >
143 > > -----Original Message-----
144 > > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
145 > > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Yusuf
146 > > Iskenderoglu
147 > > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:34 PM
148 > > To: IRC Services General Mailing List
149 > > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] database locked
150 > >
151 > > Apart from manually removing that lock file, you must upgrade your
152 > > services.
153 > >
154 > > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 05:20, Andrew G. Buenaventura wrote:
155 > > > I am getting the following error message after almost an hour of
156 running
157 > > > ircservices 5.0.23 on unreal 3.2 beta 19:
158 > > >
159 > > > [12:17] -irc2.yehey.com- *** Global -- from services.yehey.com:
160 Warning:
161 > > > Databases are locked, and cannot be updated. Remove the
162 > > > `/usr/local/ircservices/lib/.lock' file to allow database updates.
163 > > >
164 > > > What do you think is wrong?
165 > > >
166 > > > ______________________________________________________________________
167 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
168 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
169 > > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
170 > >
171 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
172 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
173 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
174 > >
175 > > ______________________________________________________________________
176 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
177 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
178 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
179 >
180 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
181 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
182 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
183
184
185 From andrew at teamyehey.com Wed Feb 11 19:08:01 2004
186 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
187 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
188 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
189 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CF82@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
190
191 It works fine on 5.0.20. reverting to the latest known to be good
192 database still gives out the same problem
193
194
195
196 -----------------------------------------------------
197 Andrew G. Buenaventura
198 MIS Manager
199
200 38/F Discovery Centre
201 25 ADB Avenue, Ortigas Center
202 Pasig City, Philippines
203
204 Tel: (632) 910-6419
205 Fax: (632) 910-6420
206 Email : andrew@teamyehey.com
207 andrew@freebsd.org.ph
208
209 -----------------------------------------------------
210 WWW.YEHEY.COM
211 y o u r i n t e r n e t l i f e s t y l e
212
213
214 -----Original Message-----
215 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
216 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Craig Edwards
217 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 7:50 PM
218 To: IRC Services General Mailing Lis
219 Subject: Re: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
220
221 if you have a backup of your services database, have you tried reverting
222 to it? The one you have now may have become corrupted in some way?
223
224 >I am using 5.0.23. Isn't it the latest version?
225 >
226 >Manually removing the .lock file causes services to segfault.
227 >
228 >
229 >-----Original Message-----
230 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
231 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Yusuf
232 >Iskenderoglu
233 >Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:34 PM
234 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List
235 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] database locked
236 >
237 >Apart from manually removing that lock file, you must upgrade your
238 >services.
239 >
240 >On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 05:20, Andrew G. Buenaventura wrote:
241 >> I am getting the following error message after almost an hour of
242 running
243 >> ircservices 5.0.23 on unreal 3.2 beta 19:
244 >>
245 >> [12:17] -irc2.yehey.com- *** Global -- from services.yehey.com:
246 Warning:
247 >> Databases are locked, and cannot be updated. Remove the
248 >> `/usr/local/ircservices/lib/.lock' file to allow database updates.
249 >>
250 >> What do you think is wrong?
251 >>
252 >> ______________________________________________________________________
253 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
254 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
255 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
256 >
257 >------------------------------------------------------------------
258 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
259 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
260 >
261 >------------------------------------------------------------------
262 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
263 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
264 >
265
266 ------------------------------------------------------------------
267 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
268 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
269 -------------- next part --------------
270 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
271 Name: smime.p7s
272 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
273 Size: 3562 bytes
274 Desc: not available
275 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040212/caff36c7/smime.bin
276 From andrew at teamyehey.com Wed Feb 11 20:25:02 2004
277 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
278 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
279 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
280 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CF89@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
281
282 Here are the details of my set up:
283
284 Openbsd 3.4
285 Unreal3.2-beta19cvs20040209 or unreal 3.2 beta 19
286 Ircservices 5.0.25 and 5.0.28
287 Databases were migrated from a working 5.0.20 system
288
289 When I run /msg operserv update, I get the following:
290
291 [Feb 12 04:25:25.352999 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
292 :Updating databases...
293 [Feb 12 04:25:25.354985 2004] debug: Saving databases
294 [Feb 12 04:25:25.484094 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
295 [Feb 12 04:25:25.484809 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com GLOBOPS
296 :PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
297 [Feb 12 04:25:25.485934 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
298 [Feb 12 04:25:25.486454 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-import'
299 [Feb 12 04:25:25.487376 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-export'
300 [Feb 12 04:25:25.487911 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
301 [Feb 12 04:25:25.488469 2004] debug: Sent: :HelpServ QUIT :
302 [Feb 12 04:25:25.489031 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/ignore'
303 [Feb 12 04:25:25.489816 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/forward'
304 [Feb 12 04:25:25.490378 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/main'
305 [Feb 12 04:25:25.490936 2004] debug: Sent: :MemoServ QUIT :
306 [Feb 12 04:25:25.491522 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/sendpass'
307 [Feb 12 04:25:25.492310 2004] debug: Unloading module
308 `chanserv/access-levels'
309 [Feb 12 04:25:25.492973 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/main'
310 [Feb 12 04:25:25.493535 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ QUIT :
311 [Feb 12 04:25:25.494618 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/sendpass'
312 [Feb 12 04:25:25.495253 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/mail-auth'
313 [Feb 12 04:25:25.495804 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/link'
314 [Feb 12 04:25:25.496345 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/autojoin'
315 [Feb 12 04:25:25.497135 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/access'
316 [Feb 12 04:25:25.497677 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/main'
317 [Feb 12 04:25:25.498235 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ QUIT :
318 [Feb 12 04:25:25.501510 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sline'
319 [Feb 12 04:25:25.502415 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sessions'
320 [Feb 12 04:25:25.503038 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/news'
321 [Feb 12 04:25:25.503584 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/akill'
322 [Feb 12 04:25:25.504236 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/main'
323 [Feb 12 04:25:25.505042 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ QUIT :
324 [Feb 12 04:25:25.505628 2004] debug: Sent: :Global QUIT :
325 [Feb 12 04:25:25.506193 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/smtp'
326 [Feb 12 04:25:25.506729 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/main'
327 [Feb 12 04:25:25.507484 2004] debug: Unloading module `database/version4'
328 [Feb 12 04:25:25.508094 2004] debug: Unloading module `protocol/unreal'
329 [Feb 12 04:25:25.508777 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com SQUIT
330 services.yehey.com :Services terminating: Segmentation fault
331 [Feb 12 04:25:25.510206 2004] debug: Deleting channel #yehey!
332 [Feb 12 04:25:25.515208 2004] debug: Deleting channel #trivia
333 [Feb 12 04:25:25.515729 2004] debug: Deleting channel #opers
334 [Feb 12 04:25:25.516280 2004] debug: Deleting channel #services
335
336 no core file was created after this. Any ideas?
337 -------------- next part --------------
338 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
339 Name: smime.p7s
340 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
341 Size: 3562 bytes
342 Desc: not available
343 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040212/54527895/smime.bin
344 From robert.daumann at rba-wuerzburg.de Thu Feb 12 00:52:05 2004
345 From: robert.daumann at rba-wuerzburg.de (Robert E. Daumann)
346 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
347 Subject: [IRCServices] Botserv needed
348 Message-ID: <18DD97782639BB4CA8E93A3C15D5A9C53629@win2k.rba-wuerzburg.lan>
349
350 Hi
351
352 I've an irc-server currently with auspice. What I've fount out is,
353 auspice and anope too have a great bug in the services esp. in nickserv.
354 So I will try the IRCServices, running with Unreal3.2/19.
355
356 My question is: IRCServices does not have any botserv with some features
357 inside, but I need one. So is it possible to enable any botserv with
358 IRCServices and which one is the best choice?
359
360 Robert
361
362
363
364 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Feb 12 09:48:15 2004
365 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
366 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
367 Subject: [IRCServices] Botserv needed
368 Message-ID: <E1ArKw1-0006iJ-Vg@ptb-relay02.plus.net>
369
370 as far as i know, its not possible to create a botserv in IRCServices, as it requires services to read its write buffer to function correctly. This would create a huge drain on CPU resources, most of it being 'redundant' data. so Services probably wont support this feature.
371
372 /****************************************
373 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
374 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
375 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
376 ****************************************/
377
378
379 /****************************************
380 * From - Robert E. Daumann <robert.daumann@rba-wuerzburg.de>
381 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
382 * Sent - 2004-02-12 08:52:05
383 * Subject - [IRCServices] Botserv needed
384 ****************************************/
385
386 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
387
388 >Hi
389 >
390 >I've an irc-server currently with auspice. What I've fount out is,
391 >auspice and anope too have a great bug in the services esp. in nickserv.
392 >So I will try the IRCServices, running with Unreal3.2/19.
393 >
394 >My question is: IRCServices does not have any botserv with some features
395 >inside, but I need one. So is it possible to enable any botserv with
396 >IRCServices and which one is the best choice?
397 >
398 >Robert
399 >
400 >
401 >------------------------------------------------------------------
402 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
403 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
404 >.
405
406 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
407
408
409
410 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Feb 13 04:16:17 2004
411 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
412 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
413 Subject: [IRCServices] Botserv needed
414 Message-ID: <200402131216.i1DCGHb29503@localhost.localdomain>
415
416 i can't see why botserv isn't possible, but if it was written it *would* cause a lot of redundant data, as the only way i can imagine this being done, it would end up contridicting chanserv a lot with mode changes etc. At one point, we were going to attempt a botserv, but instead we settled for a pared-down service called idleserv which just idles in an oper-defined list of channels to hold them open (which is generally all users want a bot for on a network with services)
417
418 >as far as i know, its not possible to create a botserv in IRCServices, as it requires services to read its write buffer to function correctly. This would create a huge drain on CPU resources, most of it being 'redundant' data. so Services probably wont support this feature.
419 >
420 >/****************************************
421 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
422 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
423 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
424 > ****************************************/
425 >
426 >
427 >/****************************************
428 > * From - Robert E. Daumann <robert.daumann@rba-wuerzburg.de>
429 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
430 > * Sent - 2004-02-12 08:52:05
431 > * Subject - [IRCServices] Botserv needed
432 > ****************************************/
433 >
434 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
435 >
436 >>Hi
437 >>
438 >>I've an irc-server currently with auspice. What I've fount out is,
439 >>auspice and anope too have a great bug in the services esp. in nickserv.
440 >>So I will try the IRCServices, running with Unreal3.2/19.
441 >>
442 >>My question is: IRCServices does not have any botserv with some features
443 >>inside, but I need one. So is it possible to enable any botserv with
444 >>IRCServices and which one is the best choice?
445 >>
446 >>Robert
447 >>
448 >>
449 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
450 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
451 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
452 >>.
453 >
454 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
455 >
456 >
457 >------------------------------------------------------------------
458 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
459 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
460
461
462 From andrew at teamyehey.com Sun Feb 15 21:43:32 2004
463 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
464 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
465 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
466 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CFA5@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
467
468
469
470
471 It worked on my linux box. Anybody knows if there's a compatibility
472 issue between obsd and ircservices?
473
474 -----Original Message-----
475 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
476 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew G.
477 Buenaventura
478 Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:25 PM
479 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
480 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
481
482 Here are the details of my set up:
483
484 Openbsd 3.4
485 Unreal3.2-beta19cvs20040209 or unreal 3.2 beta 19
486 Ircservices 5.0.25 and 5.0.28
487 Databases were migrated from a working 5.0.20 system
488
489 When I run /msg operserv update, I get the following:
490
491 [Feb 12 04:25:25.352999 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
492 :Updating databases...
493 [Feb 12 04:25:25.354985 2004] debug: Saving databases
494 [Feb 12 04:25:25.484094 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
495 [Feb 12 04:25:25.484809 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com GLOBOPS
496 :PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
497 [Feb 12 04:25:25.485934 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
498 [Feb 12 04:25:25.486454 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-import'
499 [Feb 12 04:25:25.487376 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-export'
500 [Feb 12 04:25:25.487911 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
501 [Feb 12 04:25:25.488469 2004] debug: Sent: :HelpServ QUIT :
502 [Feb 12 04:25:25.489031 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/ignore'
503 [Feb 12 04:25:25.489816 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/forward'
504 [Feb 12 04:25:25.490378 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/main'
505 [Feb 12 04:25:25.490936 2004] debug: Sent: :MemoServ QUIT :
506 [Feb 12 04:25:25.491522 2004] debug: Unloading module
507 `chanserv/sendpass'
508 [Feb 12 04:25:25.492310 2004] debug: Unloading module
509 `chanserv/access-levels'
510 [Feb 12 04:25:25.492973 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/main'
511 [Feb 12 04:25:25.493535 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ QUIT :
512 [Feb 12 04:25:25.494618 2004] debug: Unloading module
513 `nickserv/sendpass'
514 [Feb 12 04:25:25.495253 2004] debug: Unloading module
515 `nickserv/mail-auth'
516 [Feb 12 04:25:25.495804 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/link'
517 [Feb 12 04:25:25.496345 2004] debug: Unloading module
518 `nickserv/autojoin'
519 [Feb 12 04:25:25.497135 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/access'
520 [Feb 12 04:25:25.497677 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/main'
521 [Feb 12 04:25:25.498235 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ QUIT :
522 [Feb 12 04:25:25.501510 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sline'
523 [Feb 12 04:25:25.502415 2004] debug: Unloading module
524 `operserv/sessions'
525 [Feb 12 04:25:25.503038 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/news'
526 [Feb 12 04:25:25.503584 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/akill'
527 [Feb 12 04:25:25.504236 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/main'
528 [Feb 12 04:25:25.505042 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ QUIT :
529 [Feb 12 04:25:25.505628 2004] debug: Sent: :Global QUIT :
530 [Feb 12 04:25:25.506193 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/smtp'
531 [Feb 12 04:25:25.506729 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/main'
532 [Feb 12 04:25:25.507484 2004] debug: Unloading module
533 `database/version4'
534 [Feb 12 04:25:25.508094 2004] debug: Unloading module `protocol/unreal'
535 [Feb 12 04:25:25.508777 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com SQUIT
536 services.yehey.com :Services terminating: Segmentation fault
537 [Feb 12 04:25:25.510206 2004] debug: Deleting channel #yehey!
538 [Feb 12 04:25:25.515208 2004] debug: Deleting channel #trivia
539 [Feb 12 04:25:25.515729 2004] debug: Deleting channel #opers
540 [Feb 12 04:25:25.516280 2004] debug: Deleting channel #services
541
542 no core file was created after this. Any ideas?
543
544 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Feb 16 02:51:47 2004
545 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
546 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
547 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
548 Message-ID: <200402161051.i1GApmb25813@localhost.localdomain>
549
550 probably a silly question but this is an intel system right?
551
552 >
553 >
554 >
555 >It worked on my linux box. Anybody knows if there's a compatibility
556 >issue between obsd and ircservices?
557 >
558 >-----Original Message-----
559 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
560 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew G.
561 >Buenaventura
562 >Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:25 PM
563 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List
564 >Subject: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
565 >
566 >Here are the details of my set up:
567 >
568 >Openbsd 3.4
569 >Unreal3.2-beta19cvs20040209 or unreal 3.2 beta 19
570 >Ircservices 5.0.25 and 5.0.28
571 >Databases were migrated from a working 5.0.20 system
572 >
573 >When I run /msg operserv update, I get the following:
574 >
575 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.352999 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
576 >:Updating databases...
577 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.354985 2004] debug: Saving databases
578 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.484094 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
579 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.484809 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com GLOBOPS
580 >:PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
581 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.485934 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
582 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.486454 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-import'
583 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.487376 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-export'
584 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.487911 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
585 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.488469 2004] debug: Sent: :HelpServ QUIT :
586 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.489031 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/ignore'
587 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.489816 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/forward'
588 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.490378 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/main'
589 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.490936 2004] debug: Sent: :MemoServ QUIT :
590 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.491522 2004] debug: Unloading module
591 >`chanserv/sendpass'
592 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.492310 2004] debug: Unloading module
593 >`chanserv/access-levels'
594 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.492973 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/main'
595 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.493535 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ QUIT :
596 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.494618 2004] debug: Unloading module
597 >`nickserv/sendpass'
598 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.495253 2004] debug: Unloading module
599 >`nickserv/mail-auth'
600 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.495804 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/link'
601 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.496345 2004] debug: Unloading module
602 >`nickserv/autojoin'
603 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.497135 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/access'
604 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.497677 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/main'
605 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.498235 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ QUIT :
606 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.501510 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sline'
607 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.502415 2004] debug: Unloading module
608 >`operserv/sessions'
609 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.503038 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/news'
610 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.503584 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/akill'
611 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.504236 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/main'
612 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.505042 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ QUIT :
613 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.505628 2004] debug: Sent: :Global QUIT :
614 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.506193 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/smtp'
615 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.506729 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/main'
616 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.507484 2004] debug: Unloading module
617 >`database/version4'
618 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.508094 2004] debug: Unloading module `protocol/unreal'
619 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.508777 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com SQUIT
620 >services.yehey.com :Services terminating: Segmentation fault
621 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.510206 2004] debug: Deleting channel #yehey!
622 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.515208 2004] debug: Deleting channel #trivia
623 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.515729 2004] debug: Deleting channel #opers
624 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.516280 2004] debug: Deleting channel #services
625 >
626 >no core file was created after this. Any ideas?
627 >------------------------------------------------------------------
628 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
629 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
630
631
632 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Feb 16 21:10:07 2004
633 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
634 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
635 Subject: [IRCServices] old versions
636 In-Reply-To: <200402080159.i181xNb07738@localhost.localdomain>
637 Message-ID: <4030b5c7.71625@achurch.org>
638
639 >anybody know where i can find any old (as in antique) versions of ircservices? say versions 3.x and below? I enjoy looking at this kind of thing to see how code evolves over time, so if anyone has them lying around i'd welcome a tarball or two from you ;)
640
641 I have all versions since 2.2.26 (the last 2.x release), except for
642 early 4.4.x versions; I've put what I have up at
643 http://achurch.org/oldservices/ for the time being (this may disappear in
644 the near future). If anyone happens to have versions 4.4.0-6 or anything
645 before 2.2.26, please let me know.
646
647 Side note: I plan to move the Services web site sometime in March, so
648 that I can bring it up to date. I'll make an announcement when that
649 happens. (The URL will hopefully stay the same.)
650
651 --Andrew Church
652 achurch@achurch.org
653 http://achurch.org/
654
655 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Feb 16 06:20:18 2004
656 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
657 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:02 2004
658 Subject: [IRCServices] old versions
659 Message-ID: <200402161420.i1GEKJb28652@localhost.localdomain>
660
661 Got what i needed, thanks :-)
662
663 >>anybody know where i can find any old (as in antique) versions of ircservices? say versions 3.x and below? I enjoy looking at this kind of thing to see how code evolves over time, so if anyone has them lying around i'd welcome a tarball or two from you ;)
664 >
665 > I have all versions since 2.2.26 (the last 2.x release), except for
666 >early 4.4.x versions; I've put what I have up at
667 >http://achurch.org/oldservices/ for the time being (this may disappear in
668 >the near future). If anyone happens to have versions 4.4.0-6 or anything
669 >before 2.2.26, please let me know.
670 >
671 > Side note: I plan to move the Services web site sometime in March, so
672 >that I can bring it up to date. I'll make an announcement when that
673 >happens. (The URL will hopefully stay the same.)
674 >
675 > --Andrew Church
676 > achurch@achurch.org
677 > http://achurch.org/
678 >------------------------------------------------------------------
679 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
680 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
681
682
683 From andrew at teamyehey.com Mon Feb 16 18:17:52 2004
684 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
685 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
686 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
687 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CFAD@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
688
689 Yes. And I noticed that there is no core dump file. I would really
690 appreciate if you can assist me on this matter. I really want to run my
691 ircd and my ircservices on the same box to minimize the effects of
692 netsplits. Thank you.
693
694 -----Original Message-----
695 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
696 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Craig Edwards
697 Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 6:52 PM
698 To: IRC Services General Mailing Lis
699 Subject: Re: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
700
701 probably a silly question but this is an intel system right?
702
703 >
704 >
705 >
706 >It worked on my linux box. Anybody knows if there's a compatibility
707 >issue between obsd and ircservices?
708 >
709 >-----Original Message-----
710 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
711 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew G.
712 >Buenaventura
713 >Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:25 PM
714 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List
715 >Subject: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
716 >
717 >Here are the details of my set up:
718 >
719 >Openbsd 3.4
720 >Unreal3.2-beta19cvs20040209 or unreal 3.2 beta 19
721 >Ircservices 5.0.25 and 5.0.28
722 >Databases were migrated from a working 5.0.20 system
723 >
724 >When I run /msg operserv update, I get the following:
725 >
726 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.352999 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
727 >:Updating databases...
728 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.354985 2004] debug: Saving databases
729 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.484094 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
730 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.484809 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com GLOBOPS
731 >:PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
732 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.485934 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
733 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.486454 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-import'
734 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.487376 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-export'
735 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.487911 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
736 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.488469 2004] debug: Sent: :HelpServ QUIT :
737 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.489031 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/ignore'
738 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.489816 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/forward'
739 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.490378 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/main'
740 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.490936 2004] debug: Sent: :MemoServ QUIT :
741 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.491522 2004] debug: Unloading module
742 >`chanserv/sendpass'
743 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.492310 2004] debug: Unloading module
744 >`chanserv/access-levels'
745 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.492973 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/main'
746 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.493535 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ QUIT :
747 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.494618 2004] debug: Unloading module
748 >`nickserv/sendpass'
749 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.495253 2004] debug: Unloading module
750 >`nickserv/mail-auth'
751 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.495804 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/link'
752 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.496345 2004] debug: Unloading module
753 >`nickserv/autojoin'
754 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.497135 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/access'
755 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.497677 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/main'
756 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.498235 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ QUIT :
757 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.501510 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sline'
758 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.502415 2004] debug: Unloading module
759 >`operserv/sessions'
760 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.503038 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/news'
761 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.503584 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/akill'
762 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.504236 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/main'
763 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.505042 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ QUIT :
764 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.505628 2004] debug: Sent: :Global QUIT :
765 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.506193 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/smtp'
766 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.506729 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/main'
767 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.507484 2004] debug: Unloading module
768 >`database/version4'
769 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.508094 2004] debug: Unloading module `protocol/unreal'
770 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.508777 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com SQUIT
771 >services.yehey.com :Services terminating: Segmentation fault
772 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.510206 2004] debug: Deleting channel #yehey!
773 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.515208 2004] debug: Deleting channel #trivia
774 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.515729 2004] debug: Deleting channel #opers
775 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.516280 2004] debug: Deleting channel #services
776 >
777 >no core file was created after this. Any ideas?
778 >------------------------------------------------------------------
779 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
780 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
781
782 ------------------------------------------------------------------
783 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
784 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
785 -------------- next part --------------
786 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
787 Name: smime.p7s
788 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
789 Size: 3562 bytes
790 Desc: not available
791 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040217/331364e4/smime.bin
792 From andrew at teamyehey.com Mon Feb 16 20:38:42 2004
793 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
794 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
795 Subject: [IRCServices] feature request
796 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CFB1@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
797
798 Can you please add channel mode +T (unreal 3.2 RC1) in chanserv's mlock?
799 Thanks
800
801 From Brian.Duke at Level3.com Mon Feb 16 21:51:03 2004
802 From: Brian.Duke at Level3.com (Duke, Brian)
803 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
804 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
805 Message-ID: <A25D70BA9AB94F4992C3B24CF4ABF67812F8DD@idc1exc0004.corp.global.level3.com>
806
807 I know FreeBSD is inherently more secure then a RH9 machine. Just a lot
808 less stuff is automatically activated at startup. My first thought is a
809 sequencing error. Should yehey be unloaded before Unreals protocol? Also
810 does yehey bind sockets which use those protocols?
811
812 Brian Duke
813
814 -----Original Message-----
815 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
816 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew G.
817 Buenaventura
818 Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:18 PM
819 To: brain@winbot.co.uk; IRC Services General Mailing List
820 Subject: RE: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
821
822 Yes. And I noticed that there is no core dump file. I would really
823 appreciate if you can assist me on this matter. I really want to run my
824 ircd and my ircservices on the same box to minimize the effects of
825 netsplits. Thank you.
826
827 -----Original Message-----
828 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
829 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Craig
830 Edwards
831 Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 6:52 PM
832 To: IRC Services General Mailing Lis
833 Subject: Re: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
834
835 probably a silly question but this is an intel system right?
836
837 >
838 >
839 >
840 >It worked on my linux box. Anybody knows if there's a compatibility
841 >issue between obsd and ircservices?
842 >
843 >-----Original Message-----
844 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
845 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew G.
846 >Buenaventura
847 >Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:25 PM
848 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List
849 >Subject: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
850 >
851 >Here are the details of my set up:
852 >
853 >Openbsd 3.4
854 >Unreal3.2-beta19cvs20040209 or unreal 3.2 beta 19
855 >Ircservices 5.0.25 and 5.0.28
856 >Databases were migrated from a working 5.0.20 system
857 >
858 >When I run /msg operserv update, I get the following:
859 >
860 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.352999 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
861 >:Updating databases...
862 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.354985 2004] debug: Saving databases
863 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.484094 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
864 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.484809 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com GLOBOPS
865 >:PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
866 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.485934 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
867 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.486454 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-import'
868 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.487376 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-export'
869 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.487911 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
870 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.488469 2004] debug: Sent: :HelpServ QUIT :
871 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.489031 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/ignore'
872 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.489816 2004] debug: Unloading module
873 `memoserv/forward'
874 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.490378 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/main'
875 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.490936 2004] debug: Sent: :MemoServ QUIT :
876 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.491522 2004] debug: Unloading module
877 >`chanserv/sendpass'
878 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.492310 2004] debug: Unloading module
879 >`chanserv/access-levels'
880 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.492973 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/main'
881 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.493535 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ QUIT :
882 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.494618 2004] debug: Unloading module
883 >`nickserv/sendpass'
884 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.495253 2004] debug: Unloading module
885 >`nickserv/mail-auth'
886 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.495804 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/link'
887 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.496345 2004] debug: Unloading module
888 >`nickserv/autojoin'
889 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.497135 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/access'
890 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.497677 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/main'
891 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.498235 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ QUIT :
892 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.501510 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sline'
893 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.502415 2004] debug: Unloading module
894 >`operserv/sessions'
895 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.503038 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/news'
896 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.503584 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/akill'
897 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.504236 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/main'
898 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.505042 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ QUIT :
899 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.505628 2004] debug: Sent: :Global QUIT :
900 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.506193 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/smtp'
901 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.506729 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/main'
902 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.507484 2004] debug: Unloading module
903 >`database/version4'
904 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.508094 2004] debug: Unloading module `protocol/unreal'
905 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.508777 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com SQUIT
906 >services.yehey.com :Services terminating: Segmentation fault
907 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.510206 2004] debug: Deleting channel #yehey!
908 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.515208 2004] debug: Deleting channel #trivia
909 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.515729 2004] debug: Deleting channel #opers
910 >[Feb 12 04:25:25.516280 2004] debug: Deleting channel #services
911 >
912 >no core file was created after this. Any ideas?
913 >------------------------------------------------------------------
914 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
915 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
916
917 ------------------------------------------------------------------
918 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
919 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
920
921 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Mon Feb 16 21:52:39 2004
922 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
923 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
924 Subject: [IRCServices] XOP module suggestions
925 Message-ID: <web-237095425@mail01.infosat.net>
926
927 I've got some suggestions for the XOP module for future
928 versions of IRC Services:
929
930 1: Put in an "auto-deop" list that will change the access
931 level of users in that list to -1. Currently, there is no
932 way for channel owners to do this if they only use the XOP
933 module (without the access-levels module). As for a name
934 for this command, I'll leave that up to the developers.
935 2: This would probably be a tricky one to do - but if (and
936 only if) the XOP module is loaded and the access-levels
937 module is not, then try get ChanServ's STATUS command to
938 show user levels in terms of SOP, AOP, etc and not as 100,
939 50, etc.
940
941 I'd like to know what others think of these suggestions.
942 __________________________________________________________________________
943 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
944
945 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Feb 17 23:13:07 2004
946 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
947 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
948 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
949 In-Reply-To: <A25D70BA9AB94F4992C3B24CF4ABF67812F8DD@idc1exc0004.corp.global.level3.com>
950 Message-ID: <40322248.72402@achurch.org>
951
952 I haven't been following this thread closely since the original sender
953 isn't sending in plain text, but there shouldn't be endian issues with the
954 data files; I don't know of any reason to crash on update unless you're
955 using the mysterious -fstack-protector addition to GCC (try recompiling
956 with -fno-stack-protector). For core files, see FAQ Z.3.5.
957
958 --Andrew Church
959 achurch@achurch.org
960 http://achurch.org/
961
962 From andrew at teamyehey.com Tue Feb 17 19:33:32 2004
963 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
964 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
965 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
966 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CFB8@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
967
968 My sincerest apologies for sending me previous emails in HTML format. I
969 have no excuse for that except for my irresponsibility in not choosing
970 the correct format. Anyway, here are the details of my problem:
971
972 1. ircservices version - 5.0.28 (though the problem also occurs in
973 5.0.23)
974 2. ircd version - unreal 3.2 RC1 (problem is also present in unreal 3.2
975 beta19 and the latest CVS copy prior to unreal 3.2 RC1)
976 3. Series of steps:
977 1. ./ircservices -debug -nofork
978 2. /msg operserv update, then I got that database locked error
979 message telling me to delete .lock file
980 3. I deleted the .lock file
981 4. ran /msg operserv update again
982 5. ircservices core dumps with the following log:
983
984 [Feb 18 02:40:49.644650 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
985 :Updating databases...
986 [Feb 18 02:40:49.645391 2004] warning: databases are locked, not
987 updating
988 [Feb 18 02:40:49.646259 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com GLOBOPS
989 :Warning: Databases are locked, and cannot be updated. Remove the
990 `/usr/local/ircservices/lib/.lock' file to allow database updates.
991 [Feb 18 02:40:49.646851 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
992 :Database update failed.
993 [Feb 18 02:40:54.849193 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 D #teenchat
994 [Feb 18 02:40:54.849897 2004] debug: VJTD3 leaves #teenchat
995 [Feb 18 02:40:55.245086 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 , :Finished
996 Scanning
997 [Feb 18 02:40:55.245757 2004] debug: VJTD3 quits
998 [Feb 18 02:40:55.246294 2004] debug: Received: & VJTD3 2 1077071723
999 VJTD3 ppp203.net267.fl.sprint-hsd.net additional.services.yehey.com 0 +
1000 ppp203.net267.fl.sprint-hsd.net :VJTD3
1001 [Feb 18 02:40:55.247091 2004] debug: new user: VJTD3
1002 [Feb 18 02:40:55.248156 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com SVSMODE
1003 VJTD3 +d 1930359764
1004 [Feb 18 02:40:55.248686 2004] debug: Changing mode for VJTD3 to +
1005 [Feb 18 02:40:55.249201 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 AA
1006 yehey-3D80E17C.net267.fl.sprint-hsd.net
1007 [Feb 18 02:40:55.249983 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 | +x
1008 [Feb 18 02:40:55.250590 2004] debug: Changing mode for VJTD3 to +x
1009 [Feb 18 02:40:55.251139 2004] debug: Received: :irc2.yehey.com ~
1010 1069223639 #teenchat :VJTD3
1011 [Feb 18 02:40:55.251656 2004] protocol/unreal: debug: VJTD3 SJOINs
1012 #teenchat
1013 [Feb 18 02:40:55.252651 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ NOTICE VJTD3
1014 :(#teenchat) WelCoMe Sa PinaKool Na ChanneL!!! sa YeHey! So stay Cool
1015 And Stay Lng kau d2! hehehehe
1016 [Feb 18 02:41:03.028444 2004] debug: Received: :ice_man ! nickserv
1017 :identify jjkalabaw
1018 [Feb 18 02:41:03.029761 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ SVSMODE ice_man :+r
1019 [Feb 18 02:41:03.030294 2004] nickserv/main:
1020 ice_man!qbjleqbij@ipdial-179-179.tri-isys.com identified for nick
1021 ice_man
1022 [Feb 18 02:41:03.031295 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ NOTICE ice_man
1023 :Password accepted -- you are now recognized.
1024 [Feb 18 02:41:15.070640 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com 433
1025 bitoyski bitoyski :Nickname is registered to someone else
1026 [Feb 18 02:41:15.071292 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com 433
1027 YeheyTrivia YeheyTrivia :Nickname is registered to someone else
1028 [Feb 18 02:41:15.072139 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com 433 Gear
1029 Gear :Nickname is registered to someone else
1030 [Feb 18 02:41:18.804424 2004] debug: Received: :muttdaemon ! operserv
1031 :update
1032 [Feb 18 02:41:18.805174 2004] operserv/main: muttdaemon: update
1033 [Feb 18 02:41:18.806265 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
1034 :Updating databases...
1035 [Feb 18 02:41:18.808463 2004] debug: Saving databases
1036 Memory fault (core dumped)
1037
1038 6. backtrace of the core file:
1039
1040 # gdb ircservices ircservices.core
1041 GNU gdb 4.16.1
1042 Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
1043 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
1044 are
1045 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
1046 conditions.
1047 Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
1048 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
1049 details.
1050 This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-openbsd3.4"...
1051
1052 ircservices: No such file or directory.
1053
1054 Core was generated by `ircservices'.
1055 Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
1056 #0 0x1c020136 in ?? ()
1057 (gdb) bt
1058 #0 0x1c020136 in ?? ()
1059 #1 0x1c014c50 in ?? ()
1060 #2 0x1c00b798 in ?? ()
1061 #3 0x1c008ca3 in ?? ()
1062 #4 0x1c008deb in ?? ()
1063 #5 0x1c001aa1 in ?? ()
1064 #6 0x1c001a17 in ?? ()
1065 #7 0xcfbf10b8 in ?? ()
1066 #8 0x40cf in ?? ()
1067 Cannot access memory at address 0xbf0d8000.
1068 (gdb)
1069
1070
1071
1072 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Feb 18 12:50:05 2004
1073 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1074 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1075 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
1076 In-Reply-To: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CFB8@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
1077 Message-ID: <4032e13b.03670@achurch.org>
1078
1079 >My sincerest apologies for sending me previous emails in HTML format. I
1080 >have no excuse for that except for my irresponsibility in not choosing
1081 >the correct format. Anyway, here are the details of my problem:
1082
1083 Can you send me your databases privately? I'll see if I can reproduce
1084 and fix the problem here.
1085
1086 --Andrew Church
1087 achurch@achurch.org
1088 http://achurch.org/
1089
1090 From Craig at chatspike.net Wed Feb 18 09:09:22 2004
1091 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
1092 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1093 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
1094 Message-ID: <20040218170925.0C81F11466@snow.fingers.co.za>
1095
1096 hmm, i noticed that gdb couldnt open the IRCServices binary, hence the information provided was pretty much useless.. from the IRCServices binary directory, try this:
1097
1098 gdb ircservices lib/core
1099 (or where ever your core file is in relation to the binary)
1100
1101 should give some more insightful output :)
1102
1103 /****************************************
1104 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
1105 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
1106 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
1107 ****************************************/
1108
1109
1110 /****************************************
1111 * From - Andrew G. Buenaventura <andrew@teamyehey.com>
1112 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1113 * Sent - 2004-02-18 03:33:32
1114 * Subject - RE: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
1115 ****************************************/
1116
1117 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
1118
1119 >My sincerest apologies for sending me previous emails in HTML format. I
1120 >have no excuse for that except for my irresponsibility in not choosing
1121 >the correct format. Anyway, here are the details of my problem:
1122 >
1123 >1. ircservices version - 5.0.28 (though the problem also occurs in
1124 >5.0.23)
1125 >2. ircd version - unreal 3.2 RC1 (problem is also present in unreal 3.2
1126 >beta19 and the latest CVS copy prior to unreal 3.2 RC1)
1127 >3. Series of steps:
1128 > 1. ./ircservices -debug -nofork
1129 > 2. /msg operserv update, then I got that database locked error
1130 >message telling me to delete .lock file
1131 > 3. I deleted the .lock file
1132 > 4. ran /msg operserv update again
1133 > 5. ircservices core dumps with the following log:
1134 >
1135 >[Feb 18 02:40:49.644650 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
1136 >:Updating databases...
1137 >[Feb 18 02:40:49.645391 2004] warning: databases are locked, not
1138 >updating
1139 >[Feb 18 02:40:49.646259 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com GLOBOPS
1140 >:Warning: Databases are locked, and cannot be updated. Remove the
1141 >`/usr/local/ircservices/lib/.lock' file to allow database updates.
1142 >[Feb 18 02:40:49.646851 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
1143 >:Database update failed.
1144 >[Feb 18 02:40:54.849193 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 D #teenchat
1145 >[Feb 18 02:40:54.849897 2004] debug: VJTD3 leaves #teenchat
1146 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.245086 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 , :Finished
1147 >Scanning
1148 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.245757 2004] debug: VJTD3 quits
1149 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.246294 2004] debug: Received: & VJTD3 2 1077071723
1150 >VJTD3 ppp203.net267.fl.sprint-hsd.net additional.services.yehey.com 0 +
1151 >ppp203.net267.fl.sprint-hsd.net :VJTD3
1152 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.247091 2004] debug: new user: VJTD3
1153 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.248156 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com SVSMODE
1154 >VJTD3 +d 1930359764
1155 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.248686 2004] debug: Changing mode for VJTD3 to +
1156 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.249201 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 AA
1157 >yehey-3D80E17C.net267.fl.sprint-hsd.net
1158 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.249983 2004] debug: Received: :VJTD3 | +x
1159 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.250590 2004] debug: Changing mode for VJTD3 to +x
1160 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.251139 2004] debug: Received: :irc2.yehey.com ~
1161 >1069223639 #teenchat :VJTD3
1162 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.251656 2004] protocol/unreal: debug: VJTD3 SJOINs
1163 >#teenchat
1164 >[Feb 18 02:40:55.252651 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ NOTICE VJTD3
1165 >:(#teenchat) WelCoMe Sa PinaKool Na ChanneL!!! sa YeHey! So stay Cool
1166 >And Stay Lng kau d2! hehehehe
1167 >[Feb 18 02:41:03.028444 2004] debug: Received: :ice_man ! nickserv
1168 >:identify jjkalabaw
1169 >[Feb 18 02:41:03.029761 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ SVSMODE ice_man :+r
1170 >[Feb 18 02:41:03.030294 2004] nickserv/main:
1171 >ice_man!qbjleqbij@ipdial-179-179.tri-isys.com identified for nick
1172 >ice_man
1173 >[Feb 18 02:41:03.031295 2004] debug: Sent: :NickServ NOTICE ice_man
1174 >:Password accepted -- you are now recognized.
1175 >[Feb 18 02:41:15.070640 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com 433
1176 >bitoyski bitoyski :Nickname is registered to someone else
1177 >[Feb 18 02:41:15.071292 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com 433
1178 >YeheyTrivia YeheyTrivia :Nickname is registered to someone else
1179 >[Feb 18 02:41:15.072139 2004] debug: Sent: :services.yehey.com 433 Gear
1180 >Gear :Nickname is registered to someone else
1181 >[Feb 18 02:41:18.804424 2004] debug: Received: :muttdaemon ! operserv
1182 >:update
1183 >[Feb 18 02:41:18.805174 2004] operserv/main: muttdaemon: update
1184 >[Feb 18 02:41:18.806265 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE muttdaemon
1185 >:Updating databases...
1186 >[Feb 18 02:41:18.808463 2004] debug: Saving databases
1187 >Memory fault (core dumped)
1188 >
1189 > 6. backtrace of the core file:
1190 >
1191 ># gdb ircservices ircservices.core
1192 >GNU gdb 4.16.1
1193 >Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
1194 >GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
1195 >are
1196 >welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
1197 >conditions.
1198 >Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
1199 >There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
1200 >details.
1201 >This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-openbsd3.4"...
1202 >
1203 >ircservices: No such file or directory.
1204 >
1205 >Core was generated by `ircservices'.
1206 >Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
1207 >#0 0x1c020136 in ?? ()
1208 >(gdb) bt
1209 >#0 0x1c020136 in ?? ()
1210 >#1 0x1c014c50 in ?? ()
1211 >#2 0x1c00b798 in ?? ()
1212 >#3 0x1c008ca3 in ?? ()
1213 >#4 0x1c008deb in ?? ()
1214 >#5 0x1c001aa1 in ?? ()
1215 >#6 0x1c001a17 in ?? ()
1216 >#7 0xcfbf10b8 in ?? ()
1217 >#8 0x40cf in ?? ()
1218 >Cannot access memory at address 0xbf0d8000.
1219 >(gdb)
1220 >
1221 >
1222 >------------------------------------------------------------------
1223 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1224 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1225 >.
1226
1227 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
1228
1229
1230
1231 From andrew at teamyehey.com Wed Feb 18 18:57:45 2004
1232 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
1233 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1234 Subject: [SPAM] Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
1235 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CFC2@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
1236
1237 Here's the correct one:
1238
1239 # gdb ircservices lib/ircservices.core
1240 GNU gdb 4.16.1
1241 Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
1242 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
1243 are
1244 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
1245 conditions.
1246 Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
1247 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
1248 details.
1249 This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-openbsd3.4"...
1250 Core was generated by `ircservices'.
1251 Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
1252 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.30.1...done.
1253 Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld.so...done.
1254 #0 0x1c020136 in sync_channel_db (dbname=0x3c099fa0 "chan.db") at
1255 modules/database/version4.c:1247
1256 1247 SAFE(write_string(ngi_mainnick(ngi), f));
1257 (gdb) bt
1258 #0 0x1c020136 in sync_channel_db (dbname=0x3c099fa0 "chan.db") at
1259 modules/database/version4.c:1247
1260 #1 0x1c014c50 in do_save_data () at modules/chanserv/main.c:274
1261 #2 0x1c00b798 in call_callback_5 (module=0x0, id=6, arg1=0x0, arg2=0x0,
1262 arg3=0x0, arg4=0x0, arg5=0x0) at modules.c:699
1263 #3 0x1c008ca3 in do_save_data () at main.c:200
1264 #4 0x1c008deb in main (ac=3, av=0xcfbf0f78, envp=0xcfbf0f88) at
1265 main.c:250
1266 #5 0x1c001aa1 in ___start ()
1267 #6 0x1c001a17 in _start ()
1268 #7 0xcfbf10b8 in ?? ()
1269 #8 0x40cf in ?? ()
1270 Cannot access memory at address 0xbf0d8000.
1271 (gdb)
1272
1273
1274
1275 From ircservices at wdgaf.com Thu Feb 19 12:34:18 2004
1276 From: ircservices at wdgaf.com (Mark Netzel)
1277 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1278 Subject: [IRCServices] new to the list
1279 Message-ID: <007001c3f727$bfc99430$d5806e44@unit1>
1280
1281 Hello, my name is Mark, and I am new to the list, so I do not know if this
1282 has been asked before,
1283 so forgive me if it has been asked a million times before.
1284 I was wondering why the pseudo bot services Chanserv/Memoserv/Nickserv are
1285 not set usermode +i
1286 It is just a personal preference that they be set this way, much like
1287 Operserv and Global are. Is there
1288 a setting for this someplace? Is there an operational reason they aren't
1289 setup +i? Will changing them to
1290 +i via ircd services commands break them in any way?
1291
1292 Thanks,
1293
1294 Mark
1295
1296
1297
1298 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Thu Feb 19 13:48:43 2004
1299 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
1300 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1301 Subject: [IRCServices] new to the list
1302 References: <007001c3f727$bfc99430$d5806e44@unit1>
1303 Message-ID: <000a01c3f732$250b5130$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
1304
1305 I would have to say that they are not +i because they are normal services
1306 for all users to be able to use, whereas Operserv and Global are for IRCOP's
1307 only.
1308
1309 ----- Original Message -----
1310 From: "Mark Netzel" <ircservices@wdgaf.com>
1311 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1312 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 3:34 PM
1313 Subject: [IRCServices] new to the list
1314
1315
1316 > Hello, my name is Mark, and I am new to the list, so I do not know if this
1317 > has been asked before,
1318 > so forgive me if it has been asked a million times before.
1319 > I was wondering why the pseudo bot services Chanserv/Memoserv/Nickserv are
1320 > not set usermode +i
1321 > It is just a personal preference that they be set this way, much like
1322 > Operserv and Global are. Is there
1323 > a setting for this someplace? Is there an operational reason they aren't
1324 > setup +i? Will changing them to
1325 > +i via ircd services commands break them in any way?
1326 >
1327 > Thanks,
1328 >
1329 > Mark
1330 >
1331 >
1332 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1333 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1334 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1335 >
1336
1337
1338
1339 From admin at nevernet.net Fri Feb 20 21:32:18 2004
1340 From: admin at nevernet.net (Elijah)
1341 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1342 Subject: [IRCServices] NOEXPIRE question
1343 Message-ID: <20040221053354.50D281145E@snow.fingers.co.za>
1344
1345 Does noexpire affect linked nicks? From looking at info displays for a
1346 master nick and the links, it would not appear this is the case. It would
1347 seem this feature might be something useful, though also easily remedied by
1348 action by admins.
1349
1350 Any thoughts?
1351
1352 Elijah
1353
1354
1355
1356 From medice at gmx.at Sat Feb 21 02:09:08 2004
1357 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
1358 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1359 Subject: [IRCServices] NOEXPIRE question
1360 In-Reply-To: <20040221053354.50D281145E@snow.fingers.co.za>
1361 References: <20040221053354.50D281145E@snow.fingers.co.za>
1362 Message-ID: <40372E44.6070409@gmx.at>
1363
1364 Elijah wrote:
1365 > Does noexpire affect linked nicks? From looking at info displays for a
1366 > master nick and the links, it would not appear this is the case.
1367
1368 I looked on my nicks I've linked to my masternick which is noexpire of
1369 course and they all are also non expiring as well...
1370
1371 but I'm not quite sure how the system works, maybe I set noexpire first
1372 and linked the nicks afterwards so all the nicks got the noexpire, which
1373 would NOT happen if you link a bunch of nicks and set the masternick
1374 noexpire afterwards - maybe try this one out (I'm lazy ;) )
1375
1376 greetz
1377
1378 /medice
1379
1380
1381 From Craig at chatspike.net Sat Feb 21 08:38:31 2004
1382 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
1383 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1384 Subject: [IRCServices] NOEXPIRE question
1385 Message-ID: <20040221163806.0F963114D0@snow.fingers.co.za>
1386
1387 Noexpire is designed not to be set on linked nicks.. I brought this question up a few years ago.. but was told it was designed behaviour. O'm concidering coding a small patch that will effect services into letting you inherant the noexpire on linked nicks.
1388
1389 /****************************************
1390 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
1391 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
1392 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
1393 ****************************************/
1394
1395
1396 /****************************************
1397 * From - Elijah <admin@nevernet.net>
1398 * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List' <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1399 * Sent - 2004-02-21 05:32:18
1400 * Subject - [IRCServices] NOEXPIRE question
1401 ****************************************/
1402
1403 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
1404
1405 >Does noexpire affect linked nicks? From looking at info displays for a
1406 >master nick and the links, it would not appear this is the case. It would
1407 >seem this feature might be something useful, though also easily remedied by
1408 >action by admins.
1409 >
1410 >Any thoughts?
1411 >
1412 >Elijah
1413 >
1414 >
1415 >------------------------------------------------------------------
1416 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1417 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1418 >.
1419
1420 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
1421
1422
1423
1424 From andrew at teamyehey.com Tue Feb 24 01:36:31 2004
1425 From: andrew at teamyehey.com (Andrew G. Buenaventura)
1426 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1427 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
1428 Message-ID: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0D002@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
1429
1430 Hello Craig,
1431
1432 Did I send the correct one? Thanks
1433
1434
1435 -----Original Message-----
1436 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
1437 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew G.
1438 Buenaventura
1439 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:58 AM
1440 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
1441 Subject: RE: [SPAM] Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
1442
1443 Here's the correct one:
1444
1445 # gdb ircservices lib/ircservices.core
1446 GNU gdb 4.16.1
1447 Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
1448 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
1449 are
1450 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
1451 conditions.
1452 Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
1453 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
1454 details.
1455 This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-openbsd3.4"...
1456 Core was generated by `ircservices'.
1457 Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
1458 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.30.1...done.
1459 Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld.so...done.
1460 #0 0x1c020136 in sync_channel_db (dbname=0x3c099fa0 "chan.db") at
1461 modules/database/version4.c:1247
1462 1247 SAFE(write_string(ngi_mainnick(ngi), f));
1463 (gdb) bt
1464 #0 0x1c020136 in sync_channel_db (dbname=0x3c099fa0 "chan.db") at
1465 modules/database/version4.c:1247
1466 #1 0x1c014c50 in do_save_data () at modules/chanserv/main.c:274
1467 #2 0x1c00b798 in call_callback_5 (module=0x0, id=6, arg1=0x0, arg2=0x0,
1468 arg3=0x0, arg4=0x0, arg5=0x0) at modules.c:699
1469 #3 0x1c008ca3 in do_save_data () at main.c:200
1470 #4 0x1c008deb in main (ac=3, av=0xcfbf0f78, envp=0xcfbf0f88) at
1471 main.c:250
1472 #5 0x1c001aa1 in ___start ()
1473 #6 0x1c001a17 in _start ()
1474 #7 0xcfbf10b8 in ?? ()
1475 #8 0x40cf in ?? ()
1476 Cannot access memory at address 0xbf0d8000.
1477 (gdb)
1478
1479
1480 ------------------------------------------------------------------
1481 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1482 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1483
1484 From Craig at chatspike.net Tue Feb 24 03:48:29 2004
1485 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
1486 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1487 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
1488 Message-ID: <20040224114826.02A5A114A7@snow.fingers.co.za>
1489
1490 yea, that looks right :)
1491
1492 /****************************************
1493 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
1494 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
1495 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
1496 ****************************************/
1497
1498
1499 /****************************************
1500 * From - Andrew G. Buenaventura <andrew@teamyehey.com>
1501 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1502 * Sent - 2004-02-24 09:36:31
1503 * Subject - RE: [IRCServices] database locked
1504 ****************************************/
1505
1506 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
1507
1508 >Hello Craig,
1509 >
1510 >Did I send the correct one? Thanks
1511 >
1512 >
1513 >-----Original Message-----
1514 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
1515 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew G.
1516 >Buenaventura
1517 >Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:58 AM
1518 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List
1519 >Subject: RE: [SPAM] Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] database locked
1520 >
1521 >Here's the correct one:
1522 >
1523 ># gdb ircservices lib/ircservices.core
1524 >GNU gdb 4.16.1
1525 >Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
1526 >GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
1527 >are
1528 >welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
1529 >conditions.
1530 >Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
1531 >There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
1532 >details.
1533 >This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-openbsd3.4"...
1534 >Core was generated by `ircservices'.
1535 >Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
1536 >Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.30.1...done.
1537 >Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld.so...done.
1538 >#0 0x1c020136 in sync_channel_db (dbname=0x3c099fa0 "chan.db") at
1539 >modules/database/version4.c:1247
1540 >1247 SAFE(write_string(ngi_mainnick(ngi), f));
1541 >(gdb) bt
1542 >#0 0x1c020136 in sync_channel_db (dbname=0x3c099fa0 "chan.db") at
1543 >modules/database/version4.c:1247
1544 >#1 0x1c014c50 in do_save_data () at modules/chanserv/main.c:274
1545 >#2 0x1c00b798 in call_callback_5 (module=0x0, id=6, arg1=0x0, arg2=0x0,
1546 >arg3=0x0, arg4=0x0, arg5=0x0) at modules.c:699
1547 >#3 0x1c008ca3 in do_save_data () at main.c:200
1548 >#4 0x1c008deb in main (ac=3, av=0xcfbf0f78, envp=0xcfbf0f88) at
1549 >main.c:250
1550 >#5 0x1c001aa1 in ___start ()
1551 >#6 0x1c001a17 in _start ()
1552 >#7 0xcfbf10b8 in ?? ()
1553 >#8 0x40cf in ?? ()
1554 >Cannot access memory at address 0xbf0d8000.
1555 >(gdb)
1556 >
1557 >
1558 >------------------------------------------------------------------
1559 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1560 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1561 >------------------------------------------------------------------
1562 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1563 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1564 >.
1565
1566 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
1567
1568
1569
1570 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Feb 24 23:53:30 2004
1571 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1572 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1573 Subject: [IRCServices] database locked
1574 In-Reply-To: <2C0E71FD4347C84A90C07BA4F6EC7B74E0CFC2@disco-mail-1.teamyehey.local>
1575 Message-ID: <403b65e3.20411@achurch.org>
1576
1577 >#0 0x1c020136 in sync_channel_db (dbname=0x3c099fa0 "chan.db") at
1578 >modules/database/version4.c:1247
1579 >1247 SAFE(write_string(ngi_mainnick(ngi), f));
1580
1581 Okay, I've tracked this down to a compiler bug. What version of GCC
1582 did you use to compile Services?
1583
1584 --Andrew Church
1585 achurch@achurch.org
1586 http://achurch.org/
1587
1588 From helper at teklan.com.tr Tue Feb 24 15:28:19 2004
1589 From: helper at teklan.com.tr (irc.teklan.com.tr - #Help)
1590 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1591 Subject: [IRCServices] information for info re online/register time
1592 Message-ID: <20040224232819.M70560@teklan.com.tr>
1593
1594 Firstly hi,
1595 I have only just subscribed to this mail group.
1596 We have been using ircservices on our server for 3 or 4 years. I am a new
1597 user of this mail group so I'm not sure as to how we can share ideas and
1598 thoughts. Is there something that we can add to our services to show the
1599 online time, and registration time information of registered nicks.
1600
1601 For example:
1602
1603 Registered: Jan 11 23:43:15 2004 EET (44 days, 0 hours, 58 minutes and 33
1604 seconds ago.)
1605 Last identified: Feb 24 23:51:16 2004 EET (25 hours, 30 minutes and 3
1606 seconds ago.)
1607 Last seen: Feb 24 23:51:16 2004 EET (0 hours, 50 minutes ve 32 seconds ago.)
1608 Total online time: 2 days, 13 hours, 43 minutes ve 57 seconds.
1609
1610 I would appreciate all of your help and assistance.
1611 Thank you
1612
1613
1614
1615 --
1616 Teklan Internet Erisim Hizmetleri
1617 http://www.teklan.net
1618
1619
1620 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Feb 25 15:52:52 2004
1621 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1622 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1623 Subject: [IRCServices] OpenBSD segfault issue: OpenBSD 3.4 unsupported
1624 Message-ID: <403c4805.21260@achurch.org>
1625
1626 With regard to the OpenBSD segfault issue reported earlier, it looks
1627 like OpenBSD 3.4 is not yet supported by recent versions of GCC due to the
1628 switch to ELF executable format. Since GCC 2.95.3 has an OpenBSD-specific
1629 bug which caused the reported crash, this means that Services cannot
1630 currently be used with OpenBSD 3.4 (*). You'll have to either downgrade to
1631 an earlier version of OpenBSD or use a different operating system to run
1632 Services. An enhancement request has been filed with the GCC development
1633 team (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13891), but there's no
1634 indication of when OpenBSD 3.4 support will (or won't) be added.
1635
1636 (*) It may be possible to compile Services on an earlier version of OpenBSD
1637 and use the resulting executable file on OpenBSD 3.4. If anyone tries
1638 this, please let me know the result.
1639
1640 --Andrew Church
1641 achurch@achurch.org
1642 http://achurch.org/
1643
1644 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed Feb 25 05:33:01 2004
1645 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
1646 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1647 Subject: [IRCServices] A bit of info for you
1648 Message-ID: <200402251333.i1PDX2526162@localhost.localdomain>
1649
1650 hi.
1651
1652 Recently we have had many annoying but not crippling issues on our network with virus drones (e.g. with nicks like [{|` etc) and also with floodnets, and people evading bans via cgi:irc gateways. To combat this threat our oper team has started work on a project similar in structure, but different in operation, to ircservices, called 'irc defender'. It is a fully modular perl program which has modules for prevention of attacks, ban evasion, virus drone infestation etc, and can also maintain a ctcp version blacklist, and do simple version surveys of your network. We are currently seeking testers, feedback and module developers, and have asked andy if it's ok to post this to this list (of course the fact that you're reading this email shows that we have his permission) ;-)
1653
1654 If you wish to take a look at this project (which is under GPL) you may find it at:
1655 http://ircdefender.sf.net/
1656
1657 It currently only supports unrealircd (either in server mode, as a server to server link, or in client mode as an opered connection) but writing protocol modules should be easy for anyone with IRC experience and an ability to write perl scripts, so we welcome all feedback, new modules (protocol, log and scan), but as always with matters unrelated to ircservices itself please reply off the list directly to my email address (brain at winbot dot co dot uk).
1658
1659 Thanks for listening!
1660
1661 Craig Edwards aka Brain, ChatSpike IRC network
1662
1663
1664 From medice at gmx.at Wed Feb 25 14:06:30 2004
1665 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
1666 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1667 Subject: [IRCServices] log-file resetting
1668 Message-ID: <403D1C66.7010409@gmx.at>
1669
1670 Hi!
1671
1672 I didn't find anything in the conf to establish this - but it might be
1673 usefull to let ircservices reset the slog each day at midnight and
1674 change the file to smth like services-timestamp.log so you can keep your
1675 log-file small, can copy and store anywhere else and have a faster
1676 access in case you are looking for something wihtin the logs.
1677
1678 Is there any setting I missed, or might this be a new (usefull?) feature
1679 which can be optional activated at config-files
1680
1681 greets
1682 /medice
1683
1684 From emurphy at sporked.us Wed Feb 25 14:28:37 2004
1685 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric Murphy)
1686 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1687 Subject: [IRCServices] log-file resetting
1688 References: <403D1C66.7010409@gmx.at>
1689 Message-ID: <00b801c3fbee$b9d81440$0100a8c0@eric>
1690
1691 Look for this section in ircservices.conf
1692 The way I have it makes it in this example makes it rotate logs at
1693 midnight. You have to go erase them yourself still.
1694 This is line 171 in my conf file.
1695
1696 # LogFilename <filename> [REQUIRED]
1697 # Specifies the name of the file into which Services will log data.
1698 # May be overridden by the -log command-line option. If this name
1699 # contains "%y", "%m", or "%d", they will be replaced by the current
1700 # year, month, or day, respectively, and the logfile will be
1701 # automatically rotated as needed when the date changes.
1702
1703 LogFilename ircservices%m%d%y.log
1704
1705 ----- Original Message -----
1706 From: "Medice" <medice@gmx.at>
1707 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1708 Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:06 PM
1709 Subject: [IRCServices] log-file resetting
1710
1711
1712 > Hi!
1713 >
1714 > I didn't find anything in the conf to establish this - but it might be
1715 > usefull to let ircservices reset the slog each day at midnight and
1716 > change the file to smth like services-timestamp.log so you can keep your
1717 > log-file small, can copy and store anywhere else and have a faster
1718 > access in case you are looking for something wihtin the logs.
1719 >
1720 > Is there any setting I missed, or might this be a new (usefull?) feature
1721 > which can be optional activated at config-files
1722 >
1723 > greets
1724 > /medice
1725 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1726 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1727 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1728
1729
1730 From medice at gmx.at Wed Feb 25 15:00:50 2004
1731 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
1732 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1733 Subject: [IRCServices] log-file resetting
1734 In-Reply-To: <00b801c3fbee$b9d81440$0100a8c0@eric>
1735 References: <403D1C66.7010409@gmx.at> <00b801c3fbee$b9d81440$0100a8c0@eric>
1736 Message-ID: <403D2922.60305@gmx.at>
1737
1738 Eric Murphy wrote:
1739 >
1740 > # LogFilename <filename> [REQUIRED]
1741 > # Specifies the name of the file into which Services will log data.
1742 > # May be overridden by the -log command-line option. If this name
1743 > # contains "%y", "%m", or "%d", they will be replaced by the current
1744 > # year, month, or day, respectively, and the logfile will be
1745 > # automatically rotated as needed when the date changes.
1746 >
1747 > LogFilename ircservices%m%d%y.log
1748 >
1749
1750 hmmm - rtfm and do it IN DETAIL and afterwards once again ;)
1751
1752 Thx for it ;)
1753
1754 greets
1755 /medice
1756
1757 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Feb 27 03:00:55 2004
1758 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
1759 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1760 Subject: [IRCServices] bug?
1761 Message-ID: <200402271100.i1RB0t510055@localhost.localdomain>
1762
1763 Hi, using the latest version of ircservices, it crashed without error or coredump, after reloading we got a log full of these during the netjoin:
1764
1765 [Feb 27 10:44:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (49152) <= wlen (-62134)
1766 [Feb 27 10:44:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (49152) <= wlen (-62134)
1767 [Feb 27 10:44:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (49152) <= wlen (-62134)
1768 [Feb 27 10:44:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (49152) <= wlen (-62134)
1769
1770
1771 Is this normal?
1772
1773 Thanks,
1774 Brain
1775
1776 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
1777 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
1778 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
1779 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
1780 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
1781 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
1782
1783
1784 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Sun Feb 29 12:11:06 2004
1785 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
1786 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1787 Subject: [IRCServices] Test
1788 Message-ID: <001201c3ff00$2aba2130$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
1789
1790 Please ignore
1791
1792
1793 From jon at jons.org Wed Mar 3 22:54:39 2004
1794 From: jon at jons.org (Jon Christopherson)
1795 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1796 Subject: [IRCServices] Updated Hybrid7 support for ircservices 5.0.28
1797 Message-ID: <mailman.0.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1798
1799 Hello All,
1800
1801 I have brought a lot of code together to get ircservices working
1802 with hybrid 7 and would like to share it with you all.
1803
1804 The modules/files needed can be viewed/downloaded from:
1805
1806 http://www.xelink.net/hybridservices/
1807
1808 This above site also contains various README file I have written to
1809 document what I have done, and who helped me do it.
1810
1811 Hope others find it useful!
1812
1813 Regards,
1814
1815 Jon Christopherson
1816 jon <-at-> jons <-dot-> org
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Mar 4 17:43:14 2004
1825 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
1826 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1827 Subject: [IRCServices] Problems with sendmail..
1828 Message-ID: <mailman.1.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1829
1830 I just set up a copy of services on the box sitting next to me (will be used for module development etc), however, when i try to register my nickname, or anyone else tries, Services says the authcode has sent, but in the logfile, it says:
1831
1832 [Aug 27 11:23:38 2004] mail/sendmail: pclose() failed: No child processes
1833 [Aug 27 11:23:38 2004] nickserv/main: Craig registered by Craig@192.168.0.2 (Craig@chatspike.net)
1834
1835 And from what i can tell, the mail isnt sent.. anyone got any idea what may be the cause of this, and if so, how to fix it? Its important that i get this sorted as soon as possible. Thanks :)
1836
1837 /****************************************
1838 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
1839 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
1840 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
1841 ****************************************/
1842
1843
1844
1845 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Fri Mar 5 02:53:23 2004
1846 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
1847 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1848 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: Problems with sendmail..
1849 In-Reply-To: <200403051002.i25A2M0v015006@mx3.wm.co.za>
1850 Message-ID: <web-250460205@mail01.infosat.net>
1851
1852 The sendmail program is discouraged. Try SMTP instead.
1853 (Although I'm sure that someone else will help you out if
1854 you really want to stick with sendmail)
1855
1856 >
1857 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
1858 >
1859 > Message: 1
1860 > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:43:14 +0000
1861 > From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@chatspike.net>
1862 > Subject: [IRCServices] Problems with sendmail..
1863 > To: "ircservices" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1864 > Message-ID:
1865 >
1866 <mailman.0.1078480809.57194.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
1867 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
1868 >
1869 > I just set up a copy of services on the box sitting next
1870 > to me (will be used for module development etc), however,
1871 > when i try to register my nickname, or anyone else tries,
1872 > Services says the authcode has sent, but in the logfile,
1873 > it says:
1874 >
1875 > [Aug 27 11:23:38 2004] mail/sendmail: pclose() failed: No
1876 > child processes
1877 > [Aug 27 11:23:38 2004] nickserv/main: Craig registered by
1878 > Craig@192.168.0.2 (Craig@chatspike.net)
1879 >
1880 > And from what i can tell, the mail isnt sent.. anyone got
1881 > any idea what may be the cause of this, and if so, how to
1882 > fix it? Its important that i get this sorted as soon as
1883 > possible. Thanks :)
1884 >
1885 > /****************************************
1886 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
1887 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
1888 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
1889 > ****************************************/
1890 >
1891 >
1892 >
1893 >
1894 > ------------------------------
1895 >
1896 > _______________________________________________
1897 > IRCServices mailing list
1898 > IRCServices@ircservices.za.net
1899 > http://lists.g1b50n.co.za/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1900 >
1901 >
1902 > End of IRCServices Digest, Vol 15, Issue 3
1903 > ******************************************
1904
1905 __________________________________________________________________________
1906 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
1907
1908
1909 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Mar 6 11:37:03 2004
1910 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
1911 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1912 Subject: [IRCServices] Max user count?
1913 Message-ID: <200403061937.i26Jb3Y04469@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
1914
1915 any way to make ircservices not fill the log with 1500 lines of this each time we start it?
1916
1917 [Mar 06 18:57:02 2004] user: New maximum user count: 632
1918 [Mar 06 18:57:02 2004] user: New maximum user count: 633
1919 [Mar 06 18:57:02 2004] user: New maximum user count: 634
1920
1921 we have almost 1500 users on our network and the amount of lines generated like this is kinda excessive and eats the quota of the ircservices account - is this disableable via a #define or something? seems a little pointless to me and doesnt scale that well to larger networks...
1922
1923 Thanks,
1924 Brain
1925
1926
1927
1928 From ircservices at tou.de Sat Mar 6 12:35:55 2004
1929 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
1930 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1931 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug in 'CS info all'? (NS/CS-identifed founder)
1932 Message-ID: <039201c403ba$b83ad400$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
1933
1934 Hi all,
1935
1936 i'm not sure whether this is wanted behavior or simply a bug:
1937
1938 The help for 'ChanServ INFO' says "If you are identified as the founder of
1939 the channel you're getting information for and ALL is specified, the entry
1940 message and successor will also be displayed.".
1941
1942 But 'info all' only shows also extended information, if you have identified
1943 with the chanpass for your channel. If you only identified for your
1944 registered nick being founder of a channel, 'info all' doesn't show all
1945 information for your own channel.
1946 Since a "nick-identified founder" can change all the extra information 'cs
1947 info all' shows (like successor, entrymsg etc.), i do not see any reason why
1948 he shouldn't also could list these values.
1949
1950 Wolfgang
1951
1952
1953
1954 From ircservices at tou.de Sat Mar 6 12:45:04 2004
1955 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
1956 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1957 Subject: [IRCServices] Max user count?
1958 References: <200403061937.i26Jb3Y04469@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
1959 Message-ID: <03d401c403bc$0522acb0$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
1960
1961 Craig Edwards wrote:
1962
1963 > any way to make ircservices not fill the log with 1500 lines of this
1964 > each time we start it?
1965 > [Mar 06 18:57:02 2004] user: New maximum user count: 632
1966
1967 | # LogMaxUsers [OPTIONAL]
1968 | # Causes Services to write a message to the log every time a new
1969 | # user maximum is reached.
1970 |
1971 | LogMaxUsers
1972
1973 Disabling this in ircservices.conf should solve your problem.
1974
1975 greetings
1976 Wolfgang
1977
1978
1979 From us44ever at hotmail.com Sun Mar 7 04:52:37 2004
1980 From: us44ever at hotmail.com (us44ever .)
1981 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
1982 Subject: [IRCServices] Log file get's very large!
1983 Message-ID: <Sea1-F393eHu8CZI3ar000347df@hotmail.com>
1984
1985 Hi,
1986
1987 i'm using ircservices5.0.28 with Unreal-RC1 (ip encoding enabled) and the
1988 log file of the services get's very large full of the following lines:
1989
1990 [Mar 07 13:41:48 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for tmsGood
1991 not found
1992 [Mar 07 13:42:57 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for
1993 ]tG[-poste215 not found
1994 [Mar 07 13:43:09 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for Cosell
1995 not found
1996 [Mar 07 13:43:39 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for
1997 ]tG[-shani46 not found
1998 [Mar 07 14:23:46 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for T0B3 not
1999 found
2000 [Mar 07 14:44:20 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for
2001 GoldenGlobe not found
2002
2003 is there anyway to fix this or to disable the services to log this
2004 particular line?
2005
2006 Regards,
2007 David
2008
2009 _________________________________________________________________
2010 Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee when you click here.
2011 http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
2012
2013
2014
2015 From noddie_x at shadowfire.org Sun Mar 7 10:55:22 2004
2016 From: noddie_x at shadowfire.org (noddie_x)
2017 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2018 Subject: [IRCServices] Log file get's very large!
2019 In-Reply-To: <Sea1-F393eHu8CZI3ar000347df@hotmail.com>
2020 References: <Sea1-F393eHu8CZI3ar000347df@hotmail.com>
2021 Message-ID: <20040307205228.K50671@hill.noc.uunet.co.za>
2022
2023
2024 On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, us44ever . wrote:
2025
2026 > i'm using ircservices5.0.28 with Unreal-RC1 (ip encoding enabled) and the
2027 > log file of the services get's very large full of the following lines:
2028 >
2029 > [Mar 07 13:41:48 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for tmsGood
2030 > not found
2031
2032
2033 been having the same issue with beta19. from time to time also get these
2034
2035 *G* [OperServ] WARNING: Tried to delete non-existent session: $hostname
2036
2037
2038 From Craig at chatspike.net Sun Mar 7 10:57:48 2004
2039 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
2040 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2041 Subject: [IRCServices] Log file get's very large!
2042 Message-ID: <mailman.2.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2043
2044 Theres no services config directive for this, but if you want a 'quick fix' edit modules/protocol/unreal.c and comment out line 367
2045
2046 That should temporarily fix your problem.
2047
2048 /****************************************
2049 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2050 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2051 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2052 ****************************************/
2053
2054
2055 /****************************************
2056 * From - us44ever . <us44ever@hotmail.com>
2057 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2058 * Sent - 2004-03-07 12:52:37
2059 * Subject - [IRCServices] Log file get's very large!
2060 ****************************************/
2061
2062 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
2063
2064 >Hi,
2065 >
2066 >i'm using ircservices5.0.28 with Unreal-RC1 (ip encoding enabled) and the
2067 >log file of the services get's very large full of the following lines:
2068 >
2069 >[Mar 07 13:41:48 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for tmsGood
2070 >not found
2071 >[Mar 07 13:42:57 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for
2072 >]tG[-poste215 not found
2073 >[Mar 07 13:43:09 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for Cosell
2074 >not found
2075 >[Mar 07 13:43:39 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for
2076 >]tG[-shani46 not found
2077 >[Mar 07 14:23:46 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for T0B3 not
2078 >found
2079 >[Mar 07 14:44:20 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for
2080 >GoldenGlobe not found
2081 >
2082 >is there anyway to fix this or to disable the services to log this
2083 >particular line?
2084 >
2085 >Regards,
2086 >David
2087 >
2088 >_________________________________________________________________
2089 >Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee when you click here.
2090 >http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
2091 >
2092 >
2093 >------------------------------------------------------------------
2094 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2095 >http://lists.g1b50n.co.za/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2096 >.
2097
2098 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103 From noddie_x at shadowfire.org Tue Mar 9 12:32:14 2004
2104 From: noddie_x at shadowfire.org (noddie_x)
2105 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2106 Subject: [IRCServices] Log file get's very large!
2107 In-Reply-To: <E1B03UR-0006cG-7l@mx01.uunet.co.za>
2108 References: <E1B03UR-0006cG-7l@mx01.uunet.co.za>
2109 Message-ID: <20040309223052.S84534@hill.noc.uunet.co.za>
2110
2111
2112 On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Craig McLure wrote:
2113
2114 > Theres no services config directive for this, but if you want a 'quick fix' edit modules/protocol/unreal.c and comment out line 367
2115 >
2116 > That should temporarily fix your problem.
2117
2118 tx, will give it a bash. any ideas as to whos blaming who, and who is
2119 going to fix it, if in fact somebody is going to fix it.
2120
2121
2122 From irc at teknet.com.tr Thu Mar 11 06:38:10 2004
2123 From: irc at teknet.com.tr (Okan Karasoy)
2124 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2125 Subject: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2126 Message-ID: <0dcc16cb8ca9ba6d4428ada880bf99ca@teknet.com.tr>
2127
2128 Hi,
2129 Previously when we used ircservices-5.0.22 information regarding a nicks AUTHORISATION status was stated at the end of the email information, in the nick INFO. For example, if a nick had not entered its AUTH code, (unauthorised) would have been stated at the end of the email info. We are now running the new ircservices-5.0.28 and this information appears not to be available. When we look at the nick INFO, we cannot see whether a nick has entered its AUTH code or not.
2130
2131 [12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2132 [12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2133 [12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2134 [12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2135 [12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2136
2137 Is there any way of finding out wheter a nick has been authorised or not?
2138
2139
2140 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Mar 11 06:17:14 2004
2141 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
2142 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2143 Subject: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2144 Message-ID: <mailman.3.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2145
2146 /ns info <nick> ALL
2147
2148 /****************************************
2149 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2150 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2151 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2152 ****************************************/
2153
2154
2155 /****************************************
2156 * From - Okan Karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
2157 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2158 * Sent - 2004-03-11 14:38:10
2159 * Subject - [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2160 ****************************************/
2161
2162 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
2163
2164 >Hi,
2165 >Previously when we used ircservices-5.0.22 information regarding a nicks AUTHORISATION status was stated at the end of the email information, in the nick INFO. For example, if a nick had not entered its AUTH code, (unauthorised) would have been stated at the end of the email info. We are now running the new ircservices-5.0.28 and this information appears not to be available. When we look at the nick INFO, we cannot see whether a nick has entered its AUTH code or not.
2166 >
2167 >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2168 >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2169 >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2170 >[12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2171 >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2172 >
2173 >Is there any way of finding out wheter a nick has been authorised or not?
2174 >
2175 >------------------------------------------------------------------
2176 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2177 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2178 >.
2179
2180 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185 From irc at teknet.com.tr Thu Mar 11 09:55:24 2004
2186 From: irc at teknet.com.tr (Okan Karasoy)
2187 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2188 Subject: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2189 Message-ID: <3d1fa8fd6d27c7a4406f2e11d3d8d57b@teknet.com.tr>
2190
2191 The example provided is of the /ns info nick ALL command.
2192
2193 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2194 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2195 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2196 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2197 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2198
2199 > /ns info <nick> ALL
2200 >
2201 > /****************************************
2202 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2203 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2204 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2205 > ****************************************/
2206 >
2207 >
2208 > /****************************************
2209 > * From - Okan Karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
2210 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2211 > * Sent - 2004-03-11 14:38:10
2212 > * Subject - [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2213 > ****************************************/
2214 >
2215 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/>
2216 > >Hi,
2217 > >Previously when we used ircservices-5.0.22 information regarding a nicks AUTHORISATION status was stated at the end of the email information, in the nick INFO. For example, if a nick had not entered its AUTH code, (unauthorised) would have been stated at the end of the email info. We are now running the new ircservices-5.0.28 and this information appears not to be available. When we look at the nick INFO, we cannot see whether a nick has entered its AUTH code or not.
2218 > >
2219 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2220 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2221 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2222 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2223 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2224 > >
2225 > >Is there any way of finding out wheter a nick has been authorised or not?
2226 > >
2227 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
2228 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2229 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2230 > >.
2231 >
2232 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2233 >
2234 >
2235 >
2236 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2237 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2238 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2239
2240
2241
2242 From dkuntz at prismstudios.net Thu Mar 11 11:04:31 2004
2243 From: dkuntz at prismstudios.net (Douglas Kuntz)
2244 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2245 Subject: -=Spam 7=- Re: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2246 In-Reply-To: <3d1fa8fd6d27c7a4406f2e11d3d8d57b@teknet.com.tr>
2247 Message-ID: <200403111915.i2BJFSa15704@srv01.prismstudios.net>
2248
2249 What I usually do, which will work if you have access, is ns /getauth nick
2250 If it has a number, it's not authed, if it says there's no auth code, it is
2251 authed.
2252
2253 Douglas A. Kuntz
2254 WinChat Services Head
2255 http://www.winchat.net
2256
2257 -----Original Message-----
2258 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
2259 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Okan Karasoy
2260 Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:55 PM
2261 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
2262 Subject: -=Spam 7=- Re: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2263
2264 The example provided is of the /ns info nick ALL command.
2265
2266 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR [12:34:35] -NickServ- Is
2267 > >online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com [12:34:35] -NickServ- Time
2268 > >registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004 [12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail
2269 > >address: fake@fakemail.fake [12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill
2270 > >protection, Security
2271
2272 > /ns info <nick> ALL
2273 >
2274 > /****************************************
2275 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2276 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2277 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2278 > ****************************************/
2279 >
2280 >
2281 > /****************************************
2282 > * From - Okan Karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
2283 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net
2284 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2285 > * Sent - 2004-03-11 14:38:10
2286 > * Subject - [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2287 > ****************************************/
2288 >
2289 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/>
2290 > >Hi,
2291 > >Previously when we used ircservices-5.0.22 information regarding a nicks
2292 AUTHORISATION status was stated at the end of the email information, in the
2293 nick INFO. For example, if a nick had not entered its AUTH code,
2294 (unauthorised) would have been stated at the end of the email info. We are
2295 now running the new ircservices-5.0.28 and this information appears not to
2296 be available. When we look at the nick INFO, we cannot see whether a nick
2297 has entered its AUTH code or not.
2298 > >
2299 > >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR [12:34:35] -NickServ- Is
2300 > >online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com [12:34:35] -NickServ- Time
2301 > >registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004 [12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail
2302 > >address: fake@fakemail.fake [12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill
2303 > >protection, Security
2304 > >
2305 > >Is there any way of finding out wheter a nick has been authorised or not?
2306 > >
2307 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
2308 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2309 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2310 > >.
2311 >
2312 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2313 >
2314 >
2315 >
2316 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2317 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2318 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2319
2320
2321 ------------------------------------------------------------------
2322 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2323 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2324
2325 --
2326 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
2327 MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
2328 MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
2329
2330
2331 --
2332 This message has been scanned for viruses and
2333 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
2334 believed to be clean.
2335 MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
2336
2337
2338
2339 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Mar 11 12:42:12 2004
2340 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
2341 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2342 Subject: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2343 Message-ID: <mailman.4.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2344
2345 i get the word (Unauthorised) in bold next to an email that hasnt been authed after /ns info <nick> all
2346
2347 not sure why you dont..
2348
2349 /****************************************
2350 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2351 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2352 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2353 ****************************************/
2354
2355
2356 /****************************************
2357 * From - Okan Karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
2358 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2359 * Sent - 2004-03-11 17:55:24
2360 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2361 ****************************************/
2362
2363 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
2364
2365 >The example provided is of the /ns info nick ALL command.
2366 >
2367 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2368 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2369 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2370 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2371 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2372 >
2373 >> /ns info <nick> ALL
2374 >>
2375 >> /****************************************
2376 >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2377 >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2378 >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2379 >> ****************************************/
2380 >>
2381 >>
2382 >> /****************************************
2383 >> * From - Okan Karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
2384 >> * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2385 >> * Sent - 2004-03-11 14:38:10
2386 >> * Subject - [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2387 >> ****************************************/
2388 >>
2389 >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/>
2390 >> >Hi,
2391 >> >Previously when we used ircservices-5.0.22 information regarding a nicks AUTHORISATION status was stated at the end of the email information, in the nick INFO. For example, if a nick had not entered its AUTH code, (unauthorised) would have been stated at the end of the email info. We are now running the new ircservices-5.0.28 and this information appears not to be available. When we look at the nick INFO, we cannot see whether a nick has entered its AUTH code or not.
2392 >> >
2393 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2394 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2395 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2396 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2397 >> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2398 >> >
2399 >> >Is there any way of finding out wheter a nick has been authorised or not?
2400 >> >
2401 >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
2402 >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2403 >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2404 >> >.
2405 >>
2406 >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2407 >>
2408 >>
2409 >>
2410 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2411 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2412 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2413 >
2414 >
2415 >------------------------------------------------------------------
2416 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2417 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2418 >.
2419
2420 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Mar 11 12:44:18 2004
2426 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
2427 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2428 Subject: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2429 Message-ID: <mailman.5.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2430
2431 In followup, here an an example of my nickserv info all..
2432
2433 20:43| NickServ - fdfdf is Craig McLure
2434 20:43| NickServ - Last seen address: Craig@frostycoolslug.force9.co.uk
2435 20:43| NickServ - Last seen time: Mar 11 20:42:20 2004 GMT
2436 20:43| NickServ - Time registered: Mar 11 20:42:17 2004 GMT
2437 20:43| NickServ - E-mail address: Craig@chatspike.net (unverified)
2438 20:43| NickServ - Options: Security
2439
2440 Make sure you are oppered and have services oper privs. I found it doesnt work without them.
2441
2442 /****************************************
2443 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2444 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2445 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2446 ****************************************/
2447
2448
2449 /****************************************
2450 * From - Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
2451 * To - IRC Services General Mailing Lis <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2452 * Sent - 2004-03-11 20:42:11
2453 * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2454 ****************************************/
2455
2456 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
2457
2458 >i get the word (Unauthorised) in bold next to an email that hasnt been authed after /ns info <nick> all
2459 >
2460 >not sure why you dont..
2461 >
2462 >/****************************************
2463 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2464 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2465 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2466 > ****************************************/
2467 >
2468 >
2469 >/****************************************
2470 > * From - Okan Karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
2471 > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2472 > * Sent - 2004-03-11 17:55:24
2473 > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2474 > ****************************************/
2475 >
2476 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
2477 >
2478 >>The example provided is of the /ns info nick ALL command.
2479 >>
2480 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2481 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2482 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2483 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2484 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2485 >>
2486 >>> /ns info <nick> ALL
2487 >>>
2488 >>> /****************************************
2489 >>> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2490 >>> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2491 >>> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2492 >>> ****************************************/
2493 >>>
2494 >>>
2495 >>> /****************************************
2496 >>> * From - Okan Karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
2497 >>> * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2498 >>> * Sent - 2004-03-11 14:38:10
2499 >>> * Subject - [IRCServices] authorisation info in nick INFO
2500 >>> ****************************************/
2501 >>>
2502 >>> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/>
2503 >>> >Hi,
2504 >>> >Previously when we used ircservices-5.0.22 information regarding a nicks AUTHORISATION status was stated at the end of the email information, in the nick INFO. For example, if a nick had not entered its AUTH code, (unauthorised) would have been stated at the end of the email info. We are now running the new ircservices-5.0.28 and this information appears not to be available. When we look at the nick INFO, we cannot see whether a nick has entered its AUTH code or not.
2505 >>> >
2506 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- fdfdf is The MusketeeR
2507 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Is online from: MasteR@ACBD0099.ipt.aol.com
2508 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 11 11:46:45 2004
2509 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- E-mail address: fake@fakemail.fake
2510 >>> >[12:34:35] -NickServ- Options: Kill protection, Security
2511 >>> >
2512 >>> >Is there any way of finding out wheter a nick has been authorised or not?
2513 >>> >
2514 >>> >------------------------------------------------------------------
2515 >>> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2516 >>> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2517 >>> >.
2518 >>>
2519 >>> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2520 >>>
2521 >>>
2522 >>>
2523 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2524 >>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2525 >>> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2526 >>
2527 >>
2528 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
2529 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2530 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2531 >>.
2532 >
2533 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
2534 >
2535
2536 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541 From jon at jons.org Sun Mar 14 19:48:39 2004
2542 From: jon at jons.org (Jon Christopherson)
2543 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2544 Subject: [IRCServices] SJOIN bug
2545 Message-ID: <mailman.6.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2546
2547 Hello,
2548
2549 It doesn't appear as though ircservices parses the channel mode
2550 portion of a SJOIN message. This causes services set redundant modes as can
2551 be seen below:
2552
2553 [Mar 15 03:38:37.763086 2004] debug: Received: :irc.west.vile.com SJOIN
2554 1079321917 #help +nt :@ThaPrince
2555 [Mar 15 03:38:37.763203 2004] protocol/hybrid: debug: ThaPrince SJOINs #help
2556 [Mar 15 03:38:37.763259 2004] debug: Creating channel #help
2557 [Mar 15 03:38:37.763424 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ TBURST 1079321917 #help
2558 1079318625 ThaPrince :moo
2559 [Mar 15 03:38:37.763575 2004] debug: Sent: :ChanServ MODE #help +nt
2560
2561 I know that the hybrid protocol isn't supported, but the SJOIN
2562 messages it sends are the same as other IRCD's such as bahamut, and affects
2563 those as well.
2564
2565 This causes services to resend modes that are already set on a
2566 channel, quite a few when it links to a large network with a lot of
2567 channels.
2568
2569 I will try and get a patch made for it, unless someone already knows
2570 how to correct, or has already made a patch to fix this issue.
2571
2572 Regards,
2573
2574 Jon Christopherson
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Tue Mar 16 02:31:47 2004
2580 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
2581 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2582 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2583 Message-ID: <web-258832845@mail01.infosat.net>
2584
2585 I e-mailed Andy Church about this last week, but I haven't
2586 to date received a reply, so I now think that it's time for
2587 me to let the mailing list now.
2588
2589 What I've done is created some community forums for IRC
2590 Services. They are at:
2591 http://www.ircservices-forums.za.net
2592 __________________________________________________________________________
2593 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
2594
2595
2596 From Craig at chatspike.net Tue Mar 16 08:30:27 2004
2597 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
2598 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2599 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2600 Message-ID: <mailman.7.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2601
2602 Andy has constantly said 'no' to things like forums, as they will seperate the support between them and the mailing list. Also its easier to check the mailing list.
2603
2604 Besides, PHPBB sucks :/
2605
2606 /****************************************
2607 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2608 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2609 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2610 ****************************************/
2611
2612
2613 /****************************************
2614 * From - Kieron Thwaites <ron2k@webmail.co.za>
2615 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2616 * Sent - 2004-03-16 10:31:47
2617 * Subject - [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2618 ****************************************/
2619
2620 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
2621
2622 >I e-mailed Andy Church about this last week, but I haven't
2623 >to date received a reply, so I now think that it's time for
2624 >me to let the mailing list now.
2625 >
2626 >What I've done is created some community forums for IRC
2627 >Services. They are at:
2628 >http://www.ircservices-forums.za.net
2629 >__________________________________________________________________________
2630 >http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
2631 >
2632 >------------------------------------------------------------------
2633 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2634 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2635 >.
2636
2637 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643 From andrew at wtfigo.co.uk Tue Mar 16 11:27:32 2004
2644 From: andrew at wtfigo.co.uk (Andrew Kempe)
2645 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2646 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2647 In-Reply-To: <web-258832845@mail01.infosat.net>
2648 Message-ID: <mailman.8.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2649
2650 Hi there,
2651
2652 In Andy's absence (he's away at the moment)...
2653
2654 Those forums are unofficial - please make this FAR more clear on your
2655 website. As much as your good intentions are appreciated, this makes
2656 supporting IRC Services far more difficult. The address, for starters, is
2657 very misleading as it appears to be on the "official" end of the scale.
2658
2659 Please refrain from making mention of your site again on this list until, at
2660 very least, Andy gets back and makes the final decision.
2661
2662 Regards, Andrew
2663
2664 > -----Original Message-----
2665 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
2666 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
2667 > Kieron Thwaites
2668 > Sent: 16 March 2004 10:32
2669 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
2670 > Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2671 >
2672 > I e-mailed Andy Church about this last week, but I haven't to
2673 > date received a reply, so I now think that it's time for me
2674 > to let the mailing list now.
2675 >
2676 > What I've done is created some community forums for IRC
2677 > Services. They are at:
2678 > http://www.ircservices-forums.za.net
2679 > ______________________________________________________________
2680 > ____________
2681 > http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool
2682 > Connection, Cool Price
2683 >
2684 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2685 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2686 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2687
2688
2689
2690 From andrew at wtfigo.co.uk Tue Mar 16 11:44:15 2004
2691 From: andrew at wtfigo.co.uk (Andrew Kempe)
2692 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2693 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2694 In-Reply-To: <E1B3KFD-0003VH-00@mailhub-node1.mailbox.net.uk>
2695 Message-ID: <mailman.9.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2696
2697 I would like to take this opportunity to add the following comments:
2698
2699 There is a rather large amount of consolidation going on with regard to who
2700 hosts the lists, the ftp sites, the website and the mailinglists' archives.
2701
2702 There have been recent issues with the lists and the speed with which mails
2703 were being relayed. This was due to the spam filters which were in place -
2704 the sites they were communicating with were under huge DOS attacks causing
2705 endless hassles. These issues have hopefully been resolved in recent weeks.
2706 *holds thumbs*
2707
2708 The relocation of the website makes it far easier to maintain - so the
2709 history of things not being updated should be a thing of the past.
2710
2711 Lastly, the FTP site is being sorted out too - more to follow once Andy is
2712 back.
2713
2714 I know that the archives are rather difficult to browse due to there being
2715 no search engine at present. This is being rectified. Once fixed, it will
2716 make finding answers to questions far easier.
2717
2718 Regards, Andrew
2719
2720 > -----Original Message-----
2721 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
2722 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
2723 > Andrew Kempe
2724 > Sent: 16 March 2004 19:28
2725 > To: 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
2726 > Subject: RE: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2727 >
2728 > Hi there,
2729 >
2730 > In Andy's absence (he's away at the moment)...
2731 >
2732 > Those forums are unofficial - please make this FAR more clear
2733 > on your website. As much as your good intentions are
2734 > appreciated, this makes supporting IRC Services far more
2735 > difficult. The address, for starters, is very misleading as
2736 > it appears to be on the "official" end of the scale.
2737 >
2738 > Please refrain from making mention of your site again on this
2739 > list until, at very least, Andy gets back and makes the final
2740 > decision.
2741 >
2742 > Regards, Andrew
2743 >
2744 > > -----Original Message-----
2745 > > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
2746 > > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Kieron
2747 > > Thwaites
2748 > > Sent: 16 March 2004 10:32
2749 > > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
2750 > > Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2751 > >
2752 > > I e-mailed Andy Church about this last week, but I haven't to date
2753 > > received a reply, so I now think that it's time for me to let the
2754 > > mailing list now.
2755 > >
2756 > > What I've done is created some community forums for IRC
2757 > Services. They
2758 > > are at:
2759 > > http://www.ircservices-forums.za.net
2760 > > ______________________________________________________________
2761 > > ____________
2762 > > http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool
2763 > > Price
2764 > >
2765 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2766 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2767 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2768 >
2769 >
2770 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2771 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2772 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2773
2774
2775
2776 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Mar 17 20:12:01 2004
2777 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
2778 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2779 Subject: [IRCServices] Log file get's very large!
2780 In-Reply-To: <Sea1-F393eHu8CZI3ar000347df@hotmail.com>
2781 Message-ID: <40583683.10302@achurch.org>
2782
2783 >i'm using ircservices5.0.28 with Unreal-RC1 (ip encoding enabled) and the
2784 >log file of the services get's very large full of the following lines:
2785 >
2786 >[Mar 07 13:41:48 2004] protocol/unreal: m_sethost: user record for tmsGood
2787 >not found
2788
2789 IIRC, this is an intermittent bug in Unreal; I have not been able to
2790 reproduce it in my own testing. If you can find a way to consistently
2791 cause this error message to occur on an empty network, please let me know.
2792
2793 --Andrew Church
2794 achurch@achurch.org
2795 http://achurch.org/
2796
2797
2798 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Mar 17 20:20:18 2004
2799 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
2800 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2801 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services forums
2802 In-Reply-To: <web-258832845@mail01.infosat.net>
2803 Message-ID: <4058369d.10313@achurch.org>
2804
2805 >I e-mailed Andy Church about this last week, but I haven't
2806 >to date received a reply, so I now think that it's time for
2807 >me to let the mailing list now.
2808 >
2809 >What I've done is created some community forums for IRC
2810 >Services. They are at:
2811 >http://www.ircservices-forums.za.net
2812
2813 The effort is appreciated, but as I have said before, the mailing
2814 lists are the only official communication channels for Services; I have no
2815 intention of using or monitoring web "forums" or other such systems. In
2816 principle, I do not object to users creating other discussion forums for
2817 their own use, provided they do not present themselves as being "official"
2818 or otherwise supported by me; as such, if you are going to keep your forums
2819 available, I would appreciate it if you would change the URL in order not
2820 to give a false impression.
2821
2822 (Apologies for not replying personally; as Andrew Kempe mentioned,
2823 I've been on vacation and without E-mail access for the past week and a
2824 half.)
2825
2826 --Andrew Church
2827 achurch@achurch.org
2828 http://achurch.org/
2829
2830
2831 From medice at gmx.at Wed Mar 17 08:56:22 2004
2832 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
2833 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2834 Subject: [IRCServices] Log file get's very large!
2835 In-Reply-To: <40583683.10302@achurch.org>
2836 References: <40583683.10302@achurch.org>
2837 Message-ID: <40588336.7030201@gmx.at>
2838
2839 Andrew Church wrote:
2840 > IIRC, this is an intermittent bug in Unreal; I have not been able to
2841 > reproduce it in my own testing. If you can find a way to consistently
2842 > cause this error message to occur on an empty network, please let me know.
2843 >
2844
2845 I think i've discovered a relation between a user connecting on a
2846 network and getting umode +x (hidden host) and the logentry in
2847 ircservices - maybe this is caused be simultan sending user appearance
2848 and sethost (hiddenhost in this case) while services are not yet beware
2849 of the new user, maybe together with the force-umode-function you may
2850 enable in unrealircd.conf...
2851 I'll check this later on on a extra instance of unreal and ircservices
2852 in debug mode... (but I'm busy right now)
2853
2854 greets
2855 /medice
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860 From dux at fbnet.org Fri Mar 19 16:54:51 2004
2861 From: dux at fbnet.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Cerveira_=5BFBN_Administra=E7=E3o_/_Tech_team=5D?=)
2862 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2863 Subject: [IRCServices] bug on Converter ?
2864 Message-ID: <E1B4Ukc-0001Zj-00@cp.filipebrito.com>
2865
2866 Hello, I'm trying to convert a PTlink database to ircservices but i've got
2867 an error:
2868
2869
2870
2871 [dux@dux tools]$ ./convert-db +ptlink /home/dux/backup/backup.19.03.2004 >
2872 services.xml
2873 /home/dux/backup/backup.19.03.2004/nick.db: error: expected 621 nicks, got
2874 624
2875
2876
2877
2878 No matter how many nick registed I have, it give always this error: more
2879 nicks found that expected. Is this normal ?
2880
2881
2882
2883 Jo?o Cerveira
2884
2885 dux @ fbnet.org
2886
2887
2888
2889 -------------- next part --------------
2890 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2891 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040320/c613e401/attachment.html
2892 From nick at nickgawronski.com Sat Mar 20 19:08:17 2004
2893 From: nick at nickgawronski.com (Nick Gawronski)
2894 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2895 Subject: [IRCServices] feature for ircservices
2896 Message-ID: <000701c40ef1$c2cba650$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
2897
2898 Hi, I was wondering if a small script could be made that would go threw the
2899 ircservices.conf and modules.conf file and if there were new values they
2900 would be added instead of us needing to manually murge them and also I think
2901 there should be a changelog for just the current release like from
2902 ircservices-5.0.27 to ircservices-5.0.28 instead of the entire changelog
2903 file, that file is also very useful for tracking the progress of ircservices
2904 but for those of us who like to upgrade when ever a new version comes out it
2905 would be nice to know what has changed between the version we have and the
2906 newer version so this way we may not need to upgrade. bye
2907 My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
2908 Use paypal for your payments!
2909 https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
2910
2911
2912
2913 From Craig at chatspike.net Sat Mar 20 19:50:30 2004
2914 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
2915 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2916 Subject: [IRCServices] feature for ircservices
2917 Message-ID: <mailman.10.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2918
2919 Several Things:
2920
2921 1) Dont post your e-mail to both of the lists. Choose either one, or the other, thanks.
2922 2) A Changelog is supplied in the IRCServices tarchive, named 'Changes', if you wanna see whats new between the 2 last versions, its at the top.
2923 3) 'Manually Merging' directives genearlly means we have read the manual / changelog, and understand what the new features do. a Melodramatic example follows:
2924
2925 New Directive coded in, called 'SetFireToNetwork' the default is 'Yes'. Would you like services to automatically add that directive to your config? so when you start services your network catches fire. If you had read the manual r the changelog on the subject, you would know to set it to 'No'
2926
2927 And seeing as all services configs are unique to the network services is being used on, there no easy way to add directives in the right place.
2928
2929 /****************************************
2930 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2931 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2932 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2933 ****************************************/
2934
2935
2936 /****************************************
2937 * From - Nick Gawronski <nick@nickgawronski.com>
2938 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
2939 * Sent - 2004-03-21 03:08:17
2940 * Subject - [IRCServices] feature for ircservices
2941 ****************************************/
2942
2943 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
2944
2945 >Hi, I was wondering if a small script could be made that would go threw the
2946 >ircservices.conf and modules.conf file and if there were new values they
2947 >would be added instead of us needing to manually murge them and also I think
2948 >there should be a changelog for just the current release like from
2949 >ircservices-5.0.27 to ircservices-5.0.28 instead of the entire changelog
2950 >file, that file is also very useful for tracking the progress of ircservices
2951 >but for those of us who like to upgrade when ever a new version comes out it
2952 >would be nice to know what has changed between the version we have and the
2953 >newer version so this way we may not need to upgrade. bye
2954 >My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
2955 >Use paypal for your payments!
2956 >https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
2957 >
2958 >
2959 >------------------------------------------------------------------
2960 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2961 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2962 >.
2963
2964 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969 From spam at b3design.ch Sun Mar 21 00:45:39 2004
2970 From: spam at b3design.ch (Pix0r)
2971 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2972 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
2973 Message-ID: <BC8314C3.5E1E%spam@b3design.ch>
2974
2975 Hi All,
2976
2977 I'm sorry to have to ask this but would someone be kind enough to give me an
2978 example of the link block in services and the corresponding link block in
2979 unreal3.2's config sothat services links properly. I only just changed
2980 servers from 3.1 to 3.2 so I'm stuggling with the new (in my case) config.
2981
2982 Thanks for any help
2983
2984
2985
2986 From noddie_x at shadowfire.org Sun Mar 21 01:18:37 2004
2987 From: noddie_x at shadowfire.org (noddie_x)
2988 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
2989 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
2990 In-Reply-To: <BC8314C3.5E1E%spam@b3design.ch>
2991 References: <BC8314C3.5E1E%spam@b3design.ch>
2992 Message-ID: <20040321111744.W53750@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
2993
2994
2995 On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Pix0r wrote:
2996
2997 > I'm sorry to have to ask this but would someone be kind enough to give me an
2998 > example of the link block in services and the corresponding link block in
2999 > unreal3.2's config sothat services links properly. I only just changed
3000 > servers from 3.1 to 3.2 so I'm stuggling with the new (in my case) config.
3001
3002 the "link block" stays the same iirc. what errors are you getting trying
3003 the linkage?
3004
3005
3006 From emurphy at sporked.us Sun Mar 21 01:42:46 2004
3007 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric Murphy)
3008 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3009 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
3010 References: <BC8314C3.5E1E%spam@b3design.ch>
3011 <20040321111744.W53750@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
3012 Message-ID: <003a01c40f29$05a483c0$0100a8c0@eric>
3013
3014 Unreal 3.2 changed configuration files from the standard ircd.conf to
3015 something that kind of resembles C
3016 I think 3.1 was similar to bahamut /dreamforge style links
3017 Anyway, Unreal 3.2 style link:
3018
3019 link services.mynet.com {
3020 username *;
3021 hostname 192.168.0.10;
3022 bind-ip *;
3023 port 6667;
3024 hub *;
3025 password-connect "password";
3026 password-receive "password";
3027 class servers;
3028 options { };
3029 };
3030
3031 ----- Original Message -----
3032 From: "noddie_x" <noddie_x@shadowfire.org>
3033 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3034 Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 4:18 AM
3035 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Link Block
3036
3037
3038 >
3039 > On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Pix0r wrote:
3040 >
3041 > > I'm sorry to have to ask this but would someone be kind enough to give
3042 me an
3043 > > example of the link block in services and the corresponding link block
3044 in
3045 > > unreal3.2's config sothat services links properly. I only just changed
3046 > > servers from 3.1 to 3.2 so I'm stuggling with the new (in my case)
3047 config.
3048 >
3049 > the "link block" stays the same iirc. what errors are you getting trying
3050 > the linkage?
3051 >
3052 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3053 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3054 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3055
3056
3057
3058 From spam at b3design.ch Sun Mar 21 01:52:48 2004
3059 From: spam at b3design.ch (Pix0r)
3060 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3061 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
3062 In-Reply-To: <20040321111744.W53750@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
3063 Message-ID: <BC832480.5E28%spam@b3design.ch>
3064
3065 Hi and thanks for the reply, the error I'm getting from unreal is:
3066
3067 *** LocOps -- Link denied for irc.somenet.org.za(unknown@*.*.*.*) (No link
3068 block named 'irc.somenet.org.za') [@*.*.*.*.35613]
3069 *** LocOps -- ERROR :from services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] -- Link denied
3070 (No matching link configuration) [@*.*.*.*.35613]
3071 *** LocOps -- ERROR :from services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] -- Closing Link:
3072 [66.220.1.173] (Link denied (No matching link configuration))
3073 *** LocOps -- Server services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] closed the connection
3074
3075 Thanks for the help! :)
3076
3077 On 21/3/04 10:18, "noddie_x" <noddie_x@shadowfire.org> wrote:
3078
3079 >
3080 > On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Pix0r wrote:
3081 >
3082 >> I'm sorry to have to ask this but would someone be kind enough to give me an
3083 >> example of the link block in services and the corresponding link block in
3084 >> unreal3.2's config sothat services links properly. I only just changed
3085 >> servers from 3.1 to 3.2 so I'm stuggling with the new (in my case) config.
3086 >
3087 > the "link block" stays the same iirc. what errors are you getting trying
3088 > the linkage?
3089 >
3090 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3091 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3092 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3093
3094
3095
3096 From i at 1101001.com Sun Mar 21 02:10:23 2004
3097 From: i at 1101001.com (Jonathon Marshall)
3098 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3099 Subject: [IRCServices] Some questions
3100 Message-ID: <mailman.11.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3101
3102 Hi,
3103
3104 Im setting up a private irc server and there are a few things I would like
3105 to do, but I don't know how, or if IRC Services can do these things.
3106
3107 Kick/Killing users without registered nicks. So only registered users can
3108 stay connected and join channels.
3109
3110 Global ownership of channels, including new channels. Basicly no users,
3111 other than admins can be channel ops.
3112
3113 Im also having problems with the httpd server module. It asks for my
3114 password and auths correctly, but all I see is "NOT FOUND The requested
3115 resource could not be found."
3116
3117 Thanks for any help.
3118
3119 jwm
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124 From emurphy at sporked.us Sun Mar 21 06:20:06 2004
3125 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric Murphy)
3126 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3127 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
3128 References: <BC832480.5E28%spam@b3design.ch>
3129 Message-ID: <001501c40f4f$9d3f2250$0100a8c0@eric>
3130
3131 My only guess is that the name you gave the server in the link: block
3132 doesn't match the name that you have set in the ServerName field of the
3133 ircservices.conf file...also, be sure to read the status messages when you
3134 rehash unreal, it will give you the line numbers of errors if its just a
3135 mistyped configuration.
3136 ----- Original Message -----
3137 From: "Pix0r" <spam@b3design.ch>
3138 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3139 Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 4:52 AM
3140 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Link Block
3141
3142
3143 > Hi and thanks for the reply, the error I'm getting from unreal is:
3144 >
3145 > *** LocOps -- Link denied for irc.somenet.org.za(unknown@*.*.*.*) (No link
3146 > block named 'irc.somenet.org.za') [@*.*.*.*.35613]
3147 > *** LocOps -- ERROR :from services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] -- Link denied
3148 > (No matching link configuration) [@*.*.*.*.35613]
3149 > *** LocOps -- ERROR :from services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] -- Closing
3150 Link:
3151 > [66.220.1.173] (Link denied (No matching link configuration))
3152 > *** LocOps -- Server services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] closed the
3153 connection
3154 >
3155 > Thanks for the help! :)
3156 >
3157 > On 21/3/04 10:18, "noddie_x" <noddie_x@shadowfire.org> wrote:
3158 >
3159 > >
3160 > > On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Pix0r wrote:
3161 > >
3162 > >> I'm sorry to have to ask this but would someone be kind enough to give
3163 me an
3164 > >> example of the link block in services and the corresponding link block
3165 in
3166 > >> unreal3.2's config sothat services links properly. I only just changed
3167 > >> servers from 3.1 to 3.2 so I'm stuggling with the new (in my case)
3168 config.
3169 > >
3170 > > the "link block" stays the same iirc. what errors are you getting trying
3171 > > the linkage?
3172 > >
3173 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3174 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3175 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3176 >
3177 >
3178 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3179 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3180 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3181
3182
3183
3184 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Sun Mar 21 07:46:44 2004
3185 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
3186 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3187 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with Unreal
3188 Message-ID: <web-263300542@mail01.infosat.net>
3189
3190 Yes, I'm back...
3191
3192 I've just been following an interesting conversation over
3193 at UnrealIRCd, concerning a user who didn't have user modes
3194 set by NickServ (eg +r) showing up. It transpired that the
3195 services package that that user was using used Unreal's
3196 SVSMODE command, which does change the mode but does so
3197 invisibly. Unreal also features the SVS2MODE command which
3198 does the same thing as SVS2MODE, but makes it visible to
3199 the user.
3200
3201 Now, I understand that some networks might like to use
3202 SVSMODE and others might want to use SVS2MODE. Which brings
3203 me to my feature request. Would it be at all possible to
3204 add a feature to let users choose between SVSMODE and
3205 SVS2MODE (make it an option in modules.conf) when using the
3206 Unreal protocol (as well as other ircd's with a similar
3207 feature).
3208 __________________________________________________________________________
3209 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
3210
3211
3212 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Sun Mar 21 07:54:57 2004
3213 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
3214 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3215 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with Unreal
3216 In-Reply-To: <web-263300542@mail01.infosat.net>
3217 References: <web-263300542@mail01.infosat.net>
3218 Message-ID: <1079884497.12630.6.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
3219
3220 Since a user may inform themselves at ANY time using
3221 /mode <nickname>
3222 which modes they have,
3223
3224 it makes absolutely no sense to distinguish between a SVSMODE and
3225 SVS2MODE, where the first hides the MODE change from the user, and the
3226 latter does not.
3227
3228 Please ask your unreal coders to merge the whole content of SVS2MODE
3229 into SVSMODE and remove SVS2MODE completely.
3230
3231 IMHO, this is a case services shall not handle.
3232
3233 Regards;
3234 yusuf
3235
3236
3237 On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 16:46, Kieron Thwaites wrote:
3238 > Yes, I'm back...
3239 >
3240 > I've just been following an interesting conversation over
3241 > at UnrealIRCd, concerning a user who didn't have user modes
3242 > set by NickServ (eg +r) showing up. It transpired that the
3243 > services package that that user was using used Unreal's
3244 > SVSMODE command, which does change the mode but does so
3245 > invisibly. Unreal also features the SVS2MODE command which
3246 > does the same thing as SVS2MODE, but makes it visible to
3247 > the user.
3248 >
3249 > Now, I understand that some networks might like to use
3250 > SVSMODE and others might want to use SVS2MODE. Which brings
3251 > me to my feature request. Would it be at all possible to
3252 > add a feature to let users choose between SVSMODE and
3253 > SVS2MODE (make it an option in modules.conf) when using the
3254 > Unreal protocol (as well as other ircd's with a similar
3255 > feature).
3256 > __________________________________________________________________________
3257 > http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
3258 >
3259 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3260 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3261 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3262
3263
3264
3265 From spam at b3design.ch Sun Mar 21 10:15:00 2004
3266 From: spam at b3design.ch (Pix0r)
3267 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3268 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
3269 In-Reply-To: <001501c40f4f$9d3f2250$0100a8c0@eric>
3270 Message-ID: <BC839A34.5E3F%spam@b3design.ch>
3271
3272 That too was my first concern but they are identical, I have checked them
3273 more than once. Unreal doesn?t give me any errors when /rehashing.
3274 IRCservices does however give me one error: modules.conf:26: Unknown
3275 directive `NetworkDomain'. Any Ideas?
3276
3277 Thanks
3278
3279 On 21/3/04 15:20, "Eric Murphy" <emurphy@sporked.us> wrote:
3280
3281 > My only guess is that the name you gave the server in the link: block
3282 > doesn't match the name that you have set in the ServerName field of the
3283 > ircservices.conf file...also, be sure to read the status messages when you
3284 > rehash unreal, it will give you the line numbers of errors if its just a
3285 > mistyped configuration.
3286 > ----- Original Message -----
3287 > From: "Pix0r" <spam@b3design.ch>
3288 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3289 > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 4:52 AM
3290 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Link Block
3291 >
3292 >
3293 >> Hi and thanks for the reply, the error I'm getting from unreal is:
3294 >>
3295 >> *** LocOps -- Link denied for irc.somenet.org.za(unknown@*.*.*.*) (No link
3296 >> block named 'irc.somenet.org.za') [@*.*.*.*.35613]
3297 >> *** LocOps -- ERROR :from services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] -- Link denied
3298 >> (No matching link configuration) [@*.*.*.*.35613]
3299 >> *** LocOps -- ERROR :from services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] -- Closing
3300 > Link:
3301 >> [66.220.1.173] (Link denied (No matching link configuration))
3302 >> *** LocOps -- Server services.somenet.org.za[*.*.*.*] closed the
3303 > connection
3304 >>
3305 >> Thanks for the help! :)
3306 >>
3307 >> On 21/3/04 10:18, "noddie_x" <noddie_x@shadowfire.org> wrote:
3308 >>
3309 >>>
3310 >>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Pix0r wrote:
3311 >>>
3312 >>>> I'm sorry to have to ask this but would someone be kind enough to give
3313 > me an
3314 >>>> example of the link block in services and the corresponding link block
3315 > in
3316 >>>> unreal3.2's config sothat services links properly. I only just changed
3317 >>>> servers from 3.1 to 3.2 so I'm stuggling with the new (in my case)
3318 > config.
3319 >>>
3320 >>> the "link block" stays the same iirc. what errors are you getting trying
3321 >>> the linkage?
3322 >>>
3323 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
3324 >>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3325 >>> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3326 >>
3327 >>
3328 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
3329 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3330 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3331 >
3332 >
3333 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3334 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3335 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3336
3337
3338
3339 From noddie_x at shadowfire.org Sun Mar 21 10:22:38 2004
3340 From: noddie_x at shadowfire.org (noddie_x)
3341 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3342 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
3343 In-Reply-To: <BC839A34.5E3F%spam@b3design.ch>
3344 References: <BC839A34.5E3F%spam@b3design.ch>
3345 Message-ID: <20040321202000.Q54751@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
3346
3347
3348
3349 On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Pix0r wrote:
3350
3351 > That too was my first concern but they are identical, I have checked them
3352 > more than once. Unreal doesn?t give me any errors when /rehashing.
3353 > IRCservices does however give me one error: modules.conf:26: Unknown
3354 > directive `NetworkDomain'. Any Ideas?
3355 >
3356
3357 you are loading the unreal protocol in your ircservices.conf?
3358
3359 "LoadModule protocol/unreal"
3360
3361 NetworkDomain seems to only feature under the bahamut protocol.
3362
3363
3364
3365 From spam at b3design.ch Sun Mar 21 10:51:16 2004
3366 From: spam at b3design.ch (Pix0r)
3367 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3368 Subject: [IRCServices] Link Block
3369 In-Reply-To: <20040321202000.Q54751@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
3370 Message-ID: <BC83A2B4.5E45%spam@b3design.ch>
3371
3372 I figured it out, the RemoteServer was a sub-domain which did not yet exist
3373 so I just changed it to the domain itself and no it works fine. Thanks guys
3374 ;)
3375
3376
3377 On 21/3/04 19:22, "noddie_x" <noddie_x@shadowfire.org> wrote:
3378
3379 >
3380 >
3381 > On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Pix0r wrote:
3382 >
3383 >> That too was my first concern but they are identical, I have checked them
3384 >> more than once. Unreal doesn?t give me any errors when /rehashing.
3385 >> IRCservices does however give me one error: modules.conf:26: Unknown
3386 >> directive `NetworkDomain'. Any Ideas?
3387 >>
3388 >
3389 > you are loading the unreal protocol in your ircservices.conf?
3390 >
3391 > "LoadModule protocol/unreal"
3392 >
3393 > NetworkDomain seems to only feature under the bahamut protocol.
3394 >
3395 >
3396 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3397 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3398 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3399
3400
3401
3402 From dkuntz at prismstudios.net Sun Mar 21 12:07:47 2004
3403 From: dkuntz at prismstudios.net (Douglas Kuntz)
3404 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3405 Subject: [IRCServices] Quick question
3406 Message-ID: <200403212021.i2LKLY332484@srv01.prismstudios.net>
3407
3408 I havent seen this mentioned anywhere... Prolly missed it, but... When
3409 linked to our Unreal network (3.2RC2), services doesn't show in /map for any
3410 servers but the one it's linked to (even for opers/admins/netadmins, etc).
3411
3412 Is this normal?
3413
3414 Thanks
3415
3416 Douglas A. Kuntz
3417 -------------- next part --------------
3418 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
3419 Name: smime.p7s
3420 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
3421 Size: 4063 bytes
3422 Desc: not available
3423 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040321/962e15b1/smime.bin
3424 From admin at nevernet.net Sun Mar 21 12:17:04 2004
3425 From: admin at nevernet.net (Elijah)
3426 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3427 Subject: [IRCServices] Quick question
3428 In-Reply-To: <200403212021.i2LKLY332484@srv01.prismstudios.net>
3429 Message-ID: <mailman.12.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3430
3431 That's probably something you'd want to ask on an Unreal discussion list as /map
3432 is a function of the ircd.
3433
3434 Chances are it blocks U: lined servers, though.
3435
3436 Elijah
3437 nevernet irc
3438
3439 -----Original Message-----
3440 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
3441 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Kuntz
3442 Sent: Sunday, 21 March, 2004 3:08 PM
3443 To: 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
3444 Subject: [IRCServices] Quick question
3445
3446 I havent seen this mentioned anywhere... Prolly missed it, but... When
3447 linked to our Unreal network (3.2RC2), services doesn't show in /map for any
3448 servers but the one it's linked to (even for opers/admins/netadmins, etc).
3449
3450 Is this normal?
3451
3452 Thanks
3453
3454 Douglas A. Kuntz
3455
3456
3457
3458
3459 From chat at discoware.com Mon Mar 22 06:31:33 2004
3460 From: chat at discoware.com (Chat.DiSCoWARE.com)
3461 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3462 Subject: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3463 References: <BC832480.5E28%spam@b3design.ch>
3464 <001501c40f4f$9d3f2250$0100a8c0@eric>
3465 Message-ID: <003601c4101a$66e9a9c0$1368fea9@trance>
3466
3467 When release ircservices for UnrealIRCd 3.2 with prefix aq? A new services
3468 protocol....
3469
3470
3471
3472 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Mar 22 08:49:41 2004
3473 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
3474 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3475 Subject: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3476 Message-ID: <mailman.13.1098597723.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3477
3478 currently, Services does not support Unreal3.2 over beta17, although i'm currently making a temporary module which will allow it to work with the RCs untill Andrew can release an official Version. (i'll distribute here when its complete)
3479
3480 /****************************************
3481 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3482 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3483 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3484 ****************************************/
3485
3486
3487 /****************************************
3488 * From - Chat.DiSCoWARE.com <chat@discoware.com>
3489 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3490 * Sent - 2004-03-22 14:31:33
3491 * Subject - [IRCServices] prefix aq
3492 ****************************************/
3493
3494 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
3495
3496 >When release ircservices for UnrealIRCd 3.2 with prefix aq? A new services
3497 >protocol....
3498 >
3499 >
3500 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3501 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3502 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3503 >.
3504
3505 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Mon Mar 22 09:22:15 2004
3511 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
3512 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:03 2004
3513 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with
3514 Unreal
3515 Message-ID: <web-264008124@mail01.infosat.net>
3516
3517 The view at the other end (the Unreal coders) is that it's
3518 a Services issue and not an ircd one. I tend to share that
3519 view - by having Services giving the option to choose
3520 between SVSMODE and SVS2MODE, it gives the end user much
3521 more choice.
3522
3523 Unfortunately, judging by your reply, it looks like (for
3524 now anyway) the only solution will be to manually modify
3525 the unreal protocol module so that it uses SVS2MODE instead
3526 of SVSMODE. I'm not sure that everyone out there will have
3527 the necessary skill or programming knowledge to do that.
3528
3529 K.T
3530
3531 ------------------------------
3532
3533 Message: 4
3534 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:54:57 +0100
3535 From: Yusuf Iskenderoglu <uhc0@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
3536 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs
3537 SVS2MODE with
3538 Unreal
3539 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
3540 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3541 Message-ID:
3542 <1079884497.12630.6.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
3543 Content-Type: text/plain
3544
3545 Since a user may inform themselves at ANY time using
3546 /mode <nickname>
3547 which modes they have,
3548
3549 it makes absolutely no sense to distinguish between a
3550 SVSMODE and
3551 SVS2MODE, where the first hides the MODE change from the
3552 user, and the
3553 latter does not.
3554
3555 Please ask your unreal coders to merge the whole content of
3556 SVS2MODE
3557 into SVSMODE and remove SVS2MODE completely.
3558
3559 IMHO, this is a case services shall not handle.
3560
3561 Regards;
3562 yusuf
3563 __________________________________________________________________________
3564 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
3565
3566
3567 From nick at nickgawronski.com Mon Mar 22 14:26:19 2004
3568 From: nick at nickgawronski.com (Nick Gawronski)
3569 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3570 Subject: [IRCServices] adding a new service, fileserv
3571 Message-ID: <002001c4105c$b39af890$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
3572
3573 Hi, I was wondering how come and how I could add a new service to
3574 ircservices called fileserv that could both send and receive files from
3575 users threw dcc because this would be very useful for system admins to use
3576 to publish documents that a user could read offline but receive when on irc
3577 and also it would free them from setting up a bot for just file handeling.
3578 bye
3579 My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
3580 Use paypal for your payments!
3581 https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
3582
3583
3584
3585 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Mar 22 14:37:49 2004
3586 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
3587 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3588 Subject: [IRCServices] adding a new service, fileserv
3589 Message-ID: <mailman.14.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3590
3591 It would have to be coded as a module, Services does support the CTCP, however, without oppening certain ports, it wont be able to accept DCCs. So this would require a significant ammount of coding.
3592
3593 /****************************************
3594 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3595 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3596 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3597 ****************************************/
3598
3599
3600 /****************************************
3601 * From - Nick Gawronski <nick@nickgawronski.com>
3602 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3603 * Sent - 2004-03-22 22:26:19
3604 * Subject - [IRCServices] adding a new service, fileserv
3605 ****************************************/
3606
3607 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
3608
3609 >Hi, I was wondering how come and how I could add a new service to
3610 >ircservices called fileserv that could both send and receive files from
3611 >users threw dcc because this would be very useful for system admins to use
3612 >to publish documents that a user could read offline but receive when on irc
3613 >and also it would free them from setting up a bot for just file handeling.
3614 >bye
3615 >My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
3616 >Use paypal for your payments!
3617 >https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
3618 >
3619 >
3620 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3621 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3622 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3623 >.
3624
3625 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Mar 23 10:00:34 2004
3631 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3632 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3633 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with Unreal
3634 In-Reply-To: <web-264008124@mail01.infosat.net>
3635 Message-ID: <405f8d6b.30444@achurch.org>
3636
3637 I agree with Yusuf here--since the user can get their modes with /mode
3638 anyway, there's no sense in having a command that hides the change from
3639 them. And even if there was, every other ircd with SVSMODE informs the
3640 user upon an SVSMODE mode change, so if Unreal is going to make two
3641 commands, they should make SVS2MODE the one that doesn't inform the user.
3642 So the official answer is no, I'm not going to modify Services to support
3643 this Unreal feature; if it bothers you, bug the Unreal developers until
3644 they change/remove it. (I'll be sending a message their way myself.)
3645
3646 --Andrew Church
3647 achurch@achurch.org
3648 http://achurch.org/
3649
3650 >The view at the other end (the Unreal coders) is that it's
3651 >a Services issue and not an ircd one. I tend to share that
3652 >view - by having Services giving the option to choose
3653 >between SVSMODE and SVS2MODE, it gives the end user much
3654 >more choice.
3655 >
3656 >Unfortunately, judging by your reply, it looks like (for
3657 >now anyway) the only solution will be to manually modify
3658 >the unreal protocol module so that it uses SVS2MODE instead
3659 >of SVSMODE. I'm not sure that everyone out there will have
3660 >the necessary skill or programming knowledge to do that.
3661 >
3662 >K.T
3663 >
3664 >------------------------------
3665 >
3666 >Message: 4
3667 >Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:54:57 +0100
3668 >From: Yusuf Iskenderoglu <uhc0@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
3669 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs
3670 >SVS2MODE with
3671 >Unreal
3672 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List
3673 ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3674 >Message-ID:
3675 ><1079884497.12630.6.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
3676 >Content-Type: text/plain
3677 >
3678 >Since a user may inform themselves at ANY time using
3679 >/mode <nickname>
3680 >which modes they have,
3681 >
3682 >it makes absolutely no sense to distinguish between a
3683 >SVSMODE and
3684 >SVS2MODE, where the first hides the MODE change from the
3685 >user, and the
3686 >latter does not.
3687 >
3688 >Please ask your unreal coders to merge the whole content of
3689 >SVS2MODE
3690 >into SVSMODE and remove SVS2MODE completely.
3691 >
3692 >IMHO, this is a case services shall not handle.
3693 >
3694 >Regards;
3695 >yusuf
3696 >__________________________________________________________________________
3697 >http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
3698 >
3699 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3700 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3701 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3702
3703
3704 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Mar 23 10:10:45 2004
3705 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3706 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3707 Subject: [IRCServices] SVSMODE issue
3708 Message-ID: <405f8f5b.30525@achurch.org>
3709
3710 On further investigation, it seems that other ircds (at least Bahamut)
3711 also hide SVSMODE changes from the user, so perhaps Unreal's behavior is
3712 not so unusual after all. However, I still hold that since the user can
3713 get their modes at any time with /mode, there's little reason to hide the
3714 changes; and conversely, any user who wants to know their mode can just
3715 use /mode to find out. So the official answer is still no, I won't use
3716 SVS2MODE on Unreal.
3717
3718 --Andrew Church
3719 achurch@achurch.org
3720 http://achurch.org/
3721
3722
3723 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Mar 23 10:30:58 2004
3724 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3725 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3726 Subject: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3727 In-Reply-To: <405f1979.70723@mail.achurch.org>
3728 Message-ID: <405f937d.51201@achurch.org>
3729
3730 >currently, Services does not support Unreal3.2 over beta17, although i'm currently making a temporary module which will allow it to work with the RCs untill Andrew can release an official Version. (i'll distribute here when its complete)
3731
3732 As far as I can tell, the latest release of Services works fine with
3733 Unreal 3.2rc2. Are you aware of any problems?
3734
3735 --Andrew Church
3736 achurch@achurch.org
3737 http://achurch.org/
3738
3739
3740 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Mar 22 17:37:49 2004
3741 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
3742 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3743 Subject: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3744 Message-ID: <mailman.15.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3745
3746 not with prefixes, just the general mode locks, the module that is being created will ensure that things like +f are fully functional with services. when i said 'does not support' i meant 'isnt fully functional' :)
3747
3748 /****************************************
3749 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3750 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3751 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3752 ****************************************/
3753
3754
3755 /****************************************
3756 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
3757 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3758 * Sent - 2004-03-23 10:30:58
3759 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3760 ****************************************/
3761
3762 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
3763
3764 >>currently, Services does not support Unreal3.2 over beta17, although i'm currently making a temporary module which will allow it to work with the RCs untill Andrew can release an official Version. (i'll distribute here when its complete)
3765 >
3766 > As far as I can tell, the latest release of Services works fine with
3767 >Unreal 3.2rc2. Are you aware of any problems?
3768 >
3769 > --Andrew Church
3770 > achurch@achurch.org
3771 > http://achurch.org/
3772 >
3773 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3774 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3775 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3776 >.
3777
3778 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
3779
3780
3781
3782
3783 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Mar 22 17:53:47 2004
3784 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
3785 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3786 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with Unreal
3787 Message-ID: <mailman.16.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3788
3789 I agree with this, also, at the end of the day, 90% of users dont want to know they are +r, and probably 70% of them dont even know what +r is. I cant (personally) see any practical use for it. Generally the message 'Password accepted, you are now identified, have a nice day' is enough to say they have identified properly. If they really wanted to know, as has been mentioned by everyone before they can do a /mode. If someone can give me five valid reasons why a user should know that they have had the +r mode added, i'd concider thinking about it more. Untill then, i'm personally happy with SVSMODE.
3790
3791 /****************************************
3792 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3793 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3794 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3795 ****************************************/
3796
3797
3798 /****************************************
3799 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
3800 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3801 * Sent - 2004-03-23 10:00:34
3802 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with Unreal
3803 ****************************************/
3804
3805 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
3806
3807 > I agree with Yusuf here--since the user can get their modes with /mode
3808 >anyway, there's no sense in having a command that hides the change from
3809 >them. And even if there was, every other ircd with SVSMODE informs the
3810 >user upon an SVSMODE mode change, so if Unreal is going to make two
3811 >commands, they should make SVS2MODE the one that doesn't inform the user.
3812 >So the official answer is no, I'm not going to modify Services to support
3813 >this Unreal feature; if it bothers you, bug the Unreal developers until
3814 >they change/remove it. (I'll be sending a message their way myself.)
3815 >
3816 > --Andrew Church
3817 > achurch@achurch.org
3818 > http://achurch.org/
3819 >
3820 >>The view at the other end (the Unreal coders) is that it's
3821 >>a Services issue and not an ircd one. I tend to share that
3822 >>view - by having Services giving the option to choose
3823 >>between SVSMODE and SVS2MODE, it gives the end user much
3824 >>more choice.
3825 >>
3826 >>Unfortunately, judging by your reply, it looks like (for
3827 >>now anyway) the only solution will be to manually modify
3828 >>the unreal protocol module so that it uses SVS2MODE instead
3829 >>of SVSMODE. I'm not sure that everyone out there will have
3830 >>the necessary skill or programming knowledge to do that.
3831 >>
3832 >>K.T
3833 >>
3834 >>------------------------------
3835 >>
3836 >>Message: 4
3837 >>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:54:57 +0100
3838 >>From: Yusuf Iskenderoglu <uhc0@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
3839 >>Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs
3840 >>SVS2MODE with
3841 >>Unreal
3842 >>To: IRC Services General Mailing List
3843 >><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3844 >>Message-ID:
3845 >><1079884497.12630.6.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
3846 >>Content-Type: text/plain
3847 >>
3848 >>Since a user may inform themselves at ANY time using
3849 >>/mode <nickname>
3850 >>which modes they have,
3851 >>
3852 >>it makes absolutely no sense to distinguish between a
3853 >>SVSMODE and
3854 >>SVS2MODE, where the first hides the MODE change from the
3855 >>user, and the
3856 >>latter does not.
3857 >>
3858 >>Please ask your unreal coders to merge the whole content of
3859 >>SVS2MODE
3860 >>into SVSMODE and remove SVS2MODE completely.
3861 >>
3862 >>IMHO, this is a case services shall not handle.
3863 >>
3864 >>Regards;
3865 >>yusuf
3866 >>__________________________________________________________________________
3867 >>http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
3868 >>
3869 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
3870 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3871 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3872 >
3873 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3874 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3875 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3876 >.
3877
3878 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883 From lordbergee at comcast.net Mon Mar 22 18:12:35 2004
3884 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
3885 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3886 Subject: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3887 In-Reply-To: <405f937d.51201@achurch.org>
3888 References: <405f937d.51201@achurch.org>
3889 Message-ID: <405F9D13.6000707@comcast.net>
3890
3891 Andrew Church wrote:
3892 > As far as I can tell, the latest release of Services works fine with
3893 > Unreal 3.2rc2. Are you aware of any problems?
3894
3895 I use Unreal3.2 with PREFIX_AQ defined. I believe that he is talking
3896 more about the fact that Unreal with PREFIX_AQ defined now gives symbols
3897 to usermodes +q and +a, making the fact that services gives out +qo and
3898 +ao respectively rather pointless. Although I wouldn't call that
3899 broken... Unreal also calls +a channel admin instead of protection,
3900 which is somewhat confusing.
3901
3902 While I'm on the subject of things about Unreal that IRCServices
3903 doesn't support, there is also channel mode +T that disable notices to a
3904 channel that you currently cannot use the mlock to control.
3905
3906 Thinking more about it, IRCServices also does not support the Unreal +f
3907 channel mode correctly (it uses the old paramaters). Although I think I
3908 remember you saying you were waiting for them to stabalize that before
3909 updating the code to support it.
3910
3911 I kind of forgot about this, but as I was writing this, I rememeber the
3912 extended channel bans that unreal supports, which /msg ChanServ UNBAN
3913 won't remove (because it doesn't know what they are.) You can check out
3914 http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html#feature_bantypes
3915 for a list of them.
3916
3917 So I guess this ended up being a little bit longer than I thought it
3918 would, most of this stuff is more of an "annoyance" than "doesn't work",
3919 but I guess that depends on your point of view.
3920
3921 Bergee
3922
3923 P.S. I was also having a problem where rehashing IRCServices would cause
3924 the help for NickServ REGISTER to start displaying part of the help for
3925 NickServ UNSET. Has anyone else has this problem?
3926
3927
3928
3929 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Mar 22 18:23:13 2004
3930 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
3931 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
3932 Subject: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3933 Message-ID: <mailman.17.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3934
3935 i've added channel mode +T to my module, i'll have to look into the ban masks :)
3936
3937 /****************************************
3938 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3939 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3940 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3941 ****************************************/
3942
3943
3944 /****************************************
3945 * From - Bergee <lordbergee@comcast.net>
3946 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
3947 * Sent - 2004-03-23 02:12:35
3948 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] prefix aq
3949 ****************************************/
3950
3951 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
3952
3953 >Andrew Church wrote:
3954 >> As far as I can tell, the latest release of Services works fine with
3955 >> Unreal 3.2rc2. Are you aware of any problems?
3956 >
3957 > I use Unreal3.2 with PREFIX_AQ defined. I believe that he is talking
3958 >more about the fact that Unreal with PREFIX_AQ defined now gives symbols
3959 >to usermodes +q and +a, making the fact that services gives out +qo and
3960 >+ao respectively rather pointless. Although I wouldn't call that
3961 >broken... Unreal also calls +a channel admin instead of protection,
3962 >which is somewhat confusing.
3963 >
3964 > While I'm on the subject of things about Unreal that IRCServices
3965 >doesn't support, there is also channel mode +T that disable notices to a
3966 >channel that you currently cannot use the mlock to control.
3967 >
3968 > Thinking more about it, IRCServices also does not support the Unreal +f
3969 >channel mode correctly (it uses the old paramaters). Although I think I
3970 >remember you saying you were waiting for them to stabalize that before
3971 >updating the code to support it.
3972 >
3973 > I kind of forgot about this, but as I was writing this, I rememeber the
3974 >extended channel bans that unreal supports, which /msg ChanServ UNBAN
3975 >won't remove (because it doesn't know what they are.) You can check out
3976 >http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html#feature_bantypes
3977 >for a list of them.
3978 >
3979 > So I guess this ended up being a little bit longer than I thought it
3980 >would, most of this stuff is more of an "annoyance" than "doesn't work",
3981 >but I guess that depends on your point of view.
3982 >
3983 >Bergee
3984 >
3985 >P.S. I was also having a problem where rehashing IRCServices would cause
3986 >the help for NickServ REGISTER to start displaying part of the help for
3987 >NickServ UNSET. Has anyone else has this problem?
3988 >
3989 >
3990 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3991 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3992 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3993 >.
3994
3995 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
3996
3997
3998
3999
4000 From quension at mac.com Mon Mar 22 18:42:48 2004
4001 From: quension at mac.com (Trevor Talbot)
4002 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4003 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with Unreal
4004 In-Reply-To: <200403230154.i2N1sZ5X013211@mac.com>
4005 Message-ID: <C54CA5C6-7C73-11D8-828B-0003938D6866@mac.com>
4006
4007 On Monday, Mar 22, 2004, at 17:53 US/Pacific, Craig McLure wrote:
4008
4009 > If someone can give me five valid reasons why a user should know that
4010 > they have had the +r mode added, i'd concider thinking about it more.
4011
4012 The only reason that matters: automated notification of identification.
4013 E.g. script support, client support, ...
4014
4015 -- Quension
4016
4017
4018
4019 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Mar 22 18:55:47 2004
4020 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
4021 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4022 Subject: [IRCServices] prefix aq
4023 Message-ID: <mailman.18.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4024
4025 After some investigation, what would probably be best, is to register the callback cb_unban with the Unreal module, and create a new way of removing the bans from there. Due to the extent of the change, i'm not sure how easy this is going to be, however.. I'll see what i can come up with. I'm not entirly sure why the Unreal team decided on this course of action (breaking the 'Rules of the RFC' so badly) it doesnt make life very easy :/
4026
4027 /****************************************
4028 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4029 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4030 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4031 ****************************************/
4032
4033
4034 /****************************************
4035 * From - Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
4036 * To - IRC Services General Mailing Lis <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4037 * Sent - 2004-03-23 02:23:13
4038 * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] prefix aq
4039 ****************************************/
4040
4041 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
4042
4043 >i've added channel mode +T to my module, i'll have to look into the ban masks :)
4044 >
4045 >/****************************************
4046 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4047 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4048 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4049 > ****************************************/
4050 >
4051 >
4052 >/****************************************
4053 > * From - Bergee <lordbergee@comcast.net>
4054 > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4055 > * Sent - 2004-03-23 02:12:35
4056 > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] prefix aq
4057 > ****************************************/
4058 >
4059 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
4060 >
4061 >>Andrew Church wrote:
4062 >>> As far as I can tell, the latest release of Services works fine with
4063 >>> Unreal 3.2rc2. Are you aware of any problems?
4064 >>
4065 >> I use Unreal3.2 with PREFIX_AQ defined. I believe that he is talking
4066 >>more about the fact that Unreal with PREFIX_AQ defined now gives symbols
4067 >>to usermodes +q and +a, making the fact that services gives out +qo and
4068 >>+ao respectively rather pointless. Although I wouldn't call that
4069 >>broken... Unreal also calls +a channel admin instead of protection,
4070 >>which is somewhat confusing.
4071 >>
4072 >> While I'm on the subject of things about Unreal that IRCServices
4073 >>doesn't support, there is also channel mode +T that disable notices to a
4074 >>channel that you currently cannot use the mlock to control.
4075 >>
4076 >> Thinking more about it, IRCServices also does not support the Unreal +f
4077 >>channel mode correctly (it uses the old paramaters). Although I think I
4078 >>remember you saying you were waiting for them to stabalize that before
4079 >>updating the code to support it.
4080 >>
4081 >> I kind of forgot about this, but as I was writing this, I rememeber the
4082 >>extended channel bans that unreal supports, which /msg ChanServ UNBAN
4083 >>won't remove (because it doesn't know what they are.) You can check out
4084 >>http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html#feature_bantypes
4085 >>for a list of them.
4086 >>
4087 >> So I guess this ended up being a little bit longer than I thought it
4088 >>would, most of this stuff is more of an "annoyance" than "doesn't work",
4089 >>but I guess that depends on your point of view.
4090 >>
4091 >>Bergee
4092 >>
4093 >>P.S. I was also having a problem where rehashing IRCServices would cause
4094 >>the help for NickServ REGISTER to start displaying part of the help for
4095 >>NickServ UNSET. Has anyone else has this problem?
4096 >>
4097 >>
4098 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
4099 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4100 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4101 >>.
4102 >
4103 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
4104 >
4105 >
4106 >
4107 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4108 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4109 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4110 >.
4111
4112 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Mar 23 23:33:52 2004
4118 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
4119 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4120 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - SVSMODE vs SVS2MODE with Unreal
4121 In-Reply-To: <C54CA5C6-7C73-11D8-828B-0003938D6866@mac.com>
4122 Message-ID: <40604b56.55410@achurch.org>
4123
4124 >The only reason that matters: automated notification of identification.
4125 > E.g. script support, client support, ...
4126
4127 Let me put it another way: if the Unreal developers decide that the
4128 standard command, SVSMODE, should not inform clients of mode changes, then
4129 that's an Unreal issue, period. I'm not going to make Services "work
4130 around" what was arguably a design decision (whether good or bad is a
4131 separate issue). If it bothers you and Unreal doesn't change, then use
4132 another ircd.
4133
4134 --Andrew Church
4135 achurch@achurch.org
4136 http://achurch.org/
4137
4138
4139 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Mar 24 19:27:18 2004
4140 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
4141 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4142 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.29 released
4143 Message-ID: <4061633c.13035@achurch.org>
4144
4145 Services 5.0.29 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
4146
4147 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (USA, California)
4148
4149 5ab6b1127478bfd604fb8f6ad00d4a82 ircservices-5.0.29.tar.gz
4150 265a11c206fd586fb519ad5cf659515a ircservices-5.0.29.diff.gz
4151 1a5fda03124400ff1dba2b34e6ee7b9a ircservices-5.0.29-1.i386.rpm
4152 be22531132791ad45c723fbc91f10bc5 ircservices_5.0.29-1_i386.deb
4153
4154 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
4155
4156 This release includes experimental support for the Hybrid ircd; note
4157 that Hybrid needs special configuration to work with Services (see section
4158 2 of the manual). Support for the latest Unreal releases is also included.
4159
4160 Changes in version 5.0.29
4161 -------------------------
4162 2004/03/24 Added support for extended ban types, new channel mode +f
4163 format, and other feeping creaturism in Unreal 3.2.
4164 2004/03/24 Fixed PTlink channel database reading, and added workaround
4165 for PTlink bug causing inconsistent data to be stored.
4166 Reported by <dux@fbnet.org>
4167 2004/03/17 Added experimental support for Hybrid 7 servers. Thanks to
4168 Jon Christopherson <jon@jons.org> for assistance.
4169 2004/03/06 Updated tr-ircd protocol module to support version 5.7.
4170 Support for versions before 5.5 has been dropped at the
4171 tr-ircd author's request.
4172
4173 --Andrew Church
4174 achurch@achurch.org
4175 http://achurch.org/
4176
4177
4178 From Craig at chatspike.net Wed Mar 24 07:45:07 2004
4179 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
4180 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4181 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.29 released
4182 Message-ID: <mailman.19.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4183
4184 'feeping creaturism' is probably understatement of the year, but thanks for the release. I've deleted my module that does everything that andy has coded in, and my 'sendpass-encrypt' module should be finished in the next day or 2 :)
4185
4186 /****************************************
4187 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4188 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4189 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4190 ****************************************/
4191
4192
4193 /****************************************
4194 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
4195 * To - services <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4196 * Sent - 2004-03-24 19:27:18
4197 * Subject - [IRCServices] Services 5.0.29 released
4198 ****************************************/
4199
4200 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
4201
4202 > Services 5.0.29 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
4203 >
4204 >ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (USA, California)
4205 >
4206 >5ab6b1127478bfd604fb8f6ad00d4a82 ircservices-5.0.29.tar.gz
4207 >265a11c206fd586fb519ad5cf659515a ircservices-5.0.29.diff.gz
4208 >1a5fda03124400ff1dba2b34e6ee7b9a ircservices-5.0.29-1.i386.rpm
4209 >be22531132791ad45c723fbc91f10bc5 ircservices_5.0.29-1_i386.deb
4210 >
4211 >ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
4212 >
4213 > This release includes experimental support for the Hybrid ircd; note
4214 >that Hybrid needs special configuration to work with Services (see section
4215 >2 of the manual). Support for the latest Unreal releases is also included.
4216 >
4217 >Changes in version 5.0.29
4218 >-------------------------
4219 >2004/03/24 Added support for extended ban types, new channel mode +f
4220 > format, and other feeping creaturism in Unreal 3.2.
4221 >2004/03/24 Fixed PTlink channel database reading, and added workaround
4222 > for PTlink bug causing inconsistent data to be stored.
4223 > Reported by <dux@fbnet.org>
4224 >2004/03/17 Added experimental support for Hybrid 7 servers. Thanks to
4225 > Jon Christopherson <jon@jons.org> for assistance.
4226 >2004/03/06 Updated tr-ircd protocol module to support version 5.7.
4227 > Support for versions before 5.5 has been dropped at the
4228 > tr-ircd author's request.
4229 >
4230 > --Andrew Church
4231 > achurch@achurch.org
4232 > http://achurch.org/
4233 >
4234 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4235 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4236 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4237 >.
4238
4239 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
4240
4241
4242
4243
4244 From ircservices at tou.de Wed Mar 24 11:10:59 2004
4245 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
4246 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4247 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug in 'CS info all'? (NS/CS-identifed founder)
4248 References: <039201c403ba$b83ad400$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
4249 Message-ID: <019701c411d4$8a11ae50$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
4250
4251 Hi all,
4252
4253 since i got no response on my last post concerning the 'ChanServ info
4254 all'-question/bugreport, i conclude that my problem was too difficulty
4255 explained. So i made an example to show what i meant:
4256
4257
4258 1. Register a nick and a channel.
4259
4260 -> *nickserv* register xxxxxx
4261 =NickServ= Nickname mynick has been registered to you.
4262 -> *chanserv* register #mychan xxxxxx x
4263 =ChanServ= Channel #mychan registered under your nickname: mynick
4264
4265 2. Reconnect to lose any identified-status and identify for the nick (not
4266 the channel).
4267
4268 -> *nickserv* identify xxxxxx
4269 =NickServ= Password accepted -- you are now recognized.
4270
4271 3. You now have founderlevel in #mychan and can change everything, also
4272 founder, successor and password. Set the successor.
4273
4274 -> *chanserv* set #mychan successor othernick
4275 =ChanServ= Successor for #mychan changed to othernick.
4276
4277 4. Even as founder "info all" doesn't show you the successor, you were able
4278 to set shortly ago.
4279
4280 -> *chanserv* info #mychan all
4281 =ChanServ= Information for channel #mychan:
4282 =ChanServ= Founder: mynick
4283 =ChanServ= Description: x
4284 =ChanServ= Registered: Mar 24 18:44:31 2004 CET
4285 =ChanServ= Last used: Mar 24 18:48:20 2004 CET
4286 =ChanServ= Options: Topic Retention, Secure
4287 =ChanServ= Mode lock: +nt
4288
4289 5. Only if you identify with the chanpass, you are able to really see all
4290 values:
4291
4292 -> *chanserv* identify #mychan xxxxxx
4293 =ChanServ= Password accepted -- you now have founder-level access to
4294 #mychan.
4295 -> *chanserv* info #mychan all
4296 =ChanServ= Information for channel #mychan:
4297 =ChanServ= Founder: mynick
4298 =ChanServ= Successor: othernick <<<==
4299 =ChanServ= Description: x
4300 =ChanServ= Registered: Mar 24 18:44:31 2004 CET
4301 =ChanServ= Last used: Mar 24 18:50:12 2004 CET
4302 =ChanServ= Options: Topic Retention, Secure
4303 =ChanServ= Mode lock: +nt
4304
4305
4306 The "info all" command works only for services-admins and
4307 chanserv-identified users. For all others (including nickserv-identified
4308 founders), it works like "info". Maybe there is some (historical) reason for
4309 that, but I think, if you have the permissions to change values, you should
4310 also be able to view them. Or it's just a bug. ;)
4311 So i suggest to change is_identified() simply to is_founder().
4312
4313 Wolle
4314
4315
4316
4317 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Thu Mar 25 03:35:52 2004
4318 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
4319 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4320 Subject: [IRCServices] 404 changelog
4321 Message-ID: <web-266916213@mail01.infosat.net>
4322
4323 Just to inform those responsible for the website that the
4324 changelog link on the IRC services home page (linking to
4325 http://www.ircservices.za.net/Changes.html) seems to be
4326 404. Fix it, please!
4327 __________________________________________________________________________
4328 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
4329
4330
4331 From emurphy at sporked.us Thu Mar 25 12:40:24 2004
4332 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric Murphy)
4333 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4334 Subject: [IRCServices] 404 changelog
4335 References: <web-266916213@mail01.infosat.net>
4336 Message-ID: <010f01c412a9$673f9650$0100a8c0@ericsrv1>
4337
4338 The correct link is:
4339 http://www.ircservices.za.net/Changes
4340 And no, I can't remember how I found it. The upgrade from 4-5 page maybe.
4341
4342 Eric
4343
4344 ----- Original Message -----
4345 From: "Kieron Thwaites" <ron2k@webmail.co.za>
4346 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4347 Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:35 AM
4348 Subject: [IRCServices] 404 changelog
4349
4350
4351 > Just to inform those responsible for the website that the
4352 > changelog link on the IRC services home page (linking to
4353 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/Changes.html) seems to be
4354 > 404. Fix it, please!
4355 > __________________________________________________________________________
4356 > http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
4357 >
4358 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4359 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4360 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4361 >
4362
4363
4364
4365 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Mar 25 13:05:00 2004
4366 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
4367 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4368 Subject: [IRCServices] [RELEASE] Sendpass With Encrypted Passwords.
4369 Message-ID: <mailman.20.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4370
4371 As promised, i've coded these modules for the community, It will allow users to perform the sendpass command on nicknames and channels.
4372
4373 when the command is issued, Services will send them an email with an 'Authcode' in it, the user must then use the new services command 'reset' (syntax, /msg xserv resetpass <nick/chan> <authcode> <newpass>) and it will set the password for their nick / channel to <newpass>.
4374
4375 Some basic instructions:
4376
4377 Extract the archive to your services source base directory
4378 cd to sendpass-encrypt/
4379 READ THE README!
4380
4381 I will not offer support for people that dont RTFM :)
4382
4383 If you have any questions of problems with these modules, i request that you keep it off the services mailing list, and email me directly (Craig@chatspike.net).
4384
4385 Download from: http://www.chatspike.net/modules/sendpass-encrypt.tar.gz
4386
4387 thanks :)
4388
4389 /****************************************
4390 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4391 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4392 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4393 ****************************************/
4394
4395
4396
4397 From nick at nickgawronski.com Thu Mar 25 17:57:14 2004
4398 From: nick at nickgawronski.com (Nick Gawronski)
4399 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4400 Subject: [IRCServices] sendpass modules in the main services package
4401 Message-ID: <001a01c412d5$a9f61fb0$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
4402
4403 Hi, Those sendpass modules are great will they ever be included in the
4404 ircservices program, where they would all ready be installed and not need to
4405 be downloaded because these could save people a lot of time with passwords
4406 and reseting them. bye
4407 My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
4408 Use paypal for your payments!
4409 https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
4410
4411
4412
4413 From noddie_x at shadowfire.org Fri Mar 26 01:42:23 2004
4414 From: noddie_x at shadowfire.org (noddie_x)
4415 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4416 Subject: [IRCServices] .29 mlock issue
4417 Message-ID: <20040326113343.X24018@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
4418
4419
4420 hi,
4421
4422 chanserv allows you to mlock -modes that gets +'d with channel mode +f.
4423
4424 /msg chanserv set #channel mlock +ntSNT-miC+f
4425 [7c#C5,10j#i10,10k#K10,5m#m2]:10
4426
4427 for example, it allows you to add -m and +m (inside +f) rendering the mode
4428 useless.
4429
4430 -- example --
4431 [11:32] <asdsd> 1 sadfasdfasdfasdf
4432 [11:32] <asdsd> 2 dsfsdfgsdfgsdfgsdf
4433 [11:32] <asdsd> 3 ghndghndghngdhngfhngf
4434 [11:32] <asdsd> 4 dfghnjhfgjhfkjhjkgh
4435 [11:32] <asdsd> 5 dfgsdfgsdfgdsfgsdfg
4436 [11:32] <asdsd> 6 dfgdsafgsdfgfsghfdgh
4437 [11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (TriGun.ShadowFire.ORG!) +m
4438 [11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (ChanServ!services@shadowfire.org) -m
4439 [11:32] <asdsd> 11 fhdghjfhljgjkglki./hkl
4440 -- /example --
4441
4442 will it be possible to add more strict checking when adding mlocks with
4443 +f?
4444
4445
4446 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Mar 26 18:45:08 2004
4447 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
4448 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4449 Subject: [IRCServices] .29 mlock issue
4450 In-Reply-To: <20040326113343.X24018@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
4451 Message-ID: <4063fc21.27017@achurch.org>
4452
4453 Given the complexity of Unreal's +f mode, I don't really see checking
4454 this programatically as feasible; the simple answer is "don't do that". If
4455 it causes too many problems, I'll just remove MLOCK +f support entirely.
4456
4457 --Andrew Church
4458 achurch@achurch.org
4459 http://achurch.org/
4460
4461 >
4462 >hi,
4463 >
4464 >chanserv allows you to mlock -modes that gets +'d with channel mode +f.
4465 >
4466 >/msg chanserv set #channel mlock +ntSNT-miC+f
4467 >[7c#C5,10j#i10,10k#K10,5m#m2]:10
4468 >
4469 >for example, it allows you to add -m and +m (inside +f) rendering the mode
4470 >useless.
4471 >
4472 >-- example --
4473 >[11:32] <asdsd> 1 sadfasdfasdfasdf
4474 >[11:32] <asdsd> 2 dsfsdfgsdfgsdfgsdf
4475 >[11:32] <asdsd> 3 ghndghndghngdhngfhngf
4476 >[11:32] <asdsd> 4 dfghnjhfgjhfkjhjkgh
4477 >[11:32] <asdsd> 5 dfgsdfgsdfgdsfgsdfg
4478 >[11:32] <asdsd> 6 dfgdsafgsdfgfsghfdgh
4479 >[11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (TriGun.ShadowFire.ORG!) +m
4480 >[11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (ChanServ!services@shadowfire.org) -m
4481 >[11:32] <asdsd> 11 fhdghjfhljgjkglki./hkl
4482 >-- /example --
4483 >
4484 >will it be possible to add more strict checking when adding mlocks with
4485 >+f?
4486 >
4487 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4488 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4489 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4490
4491
4492 From noddie_x at shadowfire.org Fri Mar 26 01:56:09 2004
4493 From: noddie_x at shadowfire.org (noddie_x)
4494 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4495 Subject: [IRCServices] .29 mlock issue
4496 In-Reply-To: <4063fc21.27017@achurch.org>
4497 References: <4063fc21.27017@achurch.org>
4498 Message-ID: <20040326115238.B24018@verdict.schmangled.co.za>
4499
4500
4501 On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Andrew Church wrote:
4502
4503 > Given the complexity of Unreal's +f mode, I don't really see checking
4504 > this programatically as feasible; the simple answer is "don't do that". If
4505 > it causes too many problems, I'll just remove MLOCK +f support entirely.
4506
4507 a bit drastic :) leave it, it rocks. it just requires a bit of user
4508 education, i dont see a problem with that.
4509
4510
4511
4512
4513 From alisor at softhome.net Fri Mar 26 04:11:02 2004
4514 From: alisor at softhome.net (Ali Sor)
4515 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4516 Subject: [IRCServices] .29 mlock issue
4517 References: <4063fc21.27017@achurch.org>
4518 Message-ID: <003c01c4132b$6c6b4f70$0800000a@citir>
4519
4520
4521 i think adding +f mode to mlock with this new version is a perfect desicion.
4522 I hope Andrew Church wont remove +f support.
4523
4524 ----- Original Message -----
4525 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
4526 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4527 Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 11:45 AM
4528 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] .29 mlock issue
4529
4530
4531 > Given the complexity of Unreal's +f mode, I don't really see checking
4532 > this programatically as feasible; the simple answer is "don't do that".
4533 If
4534 > it causes too many problems, I'll just remove MLOCK +f support entirely.
4535 >
4536 > --Andrew Church
4537 > achurch@achurch.org
4538 > http://achurch.org/
4539 >
4540 > >
4541 > >hi,
4542 > >
4543 > >chanserv allows you to mlock -modes that gets +'d with channel mode +f.
4544 > >
4545 > >/msg chanserv set #channel mlock +ntSNT-miC+f
4546 > >[7c#C5,10j#i10,10k#K10,5m#m2]:10
4547 > >
4548 > >for example, it allows you to add -m and +m (inside +f) rendering the
4549 mode
4550 > >useless.
4551 > >
4552 > >-- example --
4553 > >[11:32] <asdsd> 1 sadfasdfasdfasdf
4554 > >[11:32] <asdsd> 2 dsfsdfgsdfgsdfgsdf
4555 > >[11:32] <asdsd> 3 ghndghndghngdhngfhngf
4556 > >[11:32] <asdsd> 4 dfghnjhfgjhfkjhjkgh
4557 > >[11:32] <asdsd> 5 dfgsdfgsdfgdsfgsdfg
4558 > >[11:32] <asdsd> 6 dfgdsafgsdfgfsghfdgh
4559 > >[11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (TriGun.ShadowFire.ORG!) +m
4560 > >[11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (ChanServ!services@shadowfire.org) -m
4561 > >[11:32] <asdsd> 11 fhdghjfhljgjkglki./hkl
4562 > >-- /example --
4563 > >
4564 > >will it be possible to add more strict checking when adding mlocks with
4565 > >+f?
4566 > >
4567 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
4568 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4569 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4570 >
4571 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4572 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4573 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4574
4575
4576
4577 From Admin at VonitsaNet.gr Fri Mar 26 04:16:35 2004
4578 From: Admin at VonitsaNet.gr (Dionisios K.)
4579 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4580 Subject: [IRCServices] Translate
4581 Message-ID: <001601c4132c$2f6dcbb0$6c3d05d5@server>
4582
4583 Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
4584 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
4585 Name: smime.p7s
4586 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
4587 Size: 3233 bytes
4588 Desc: not available
4589 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040326/b0de740b/smime.bin
4590 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri Mar 26 04:35:03 2004
4591 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
4592 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4593 Subject: [IRCServices] [RELEASE] Sendpass With Encrypted Passwords.
4594 In-Reply-To: <20040325210541.8EC1F3EF5C@mail.zoneedit.com>
4595 Message-ID: <20040326123503.54241.qmail@web86102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
4596
4597 This Is a very interesting module Craig McLure. :))
4598 I think that Andrew must add it on services.
4599
4600
4601 =====
4602 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
4603
4604
4605
4606 From Craig at chatspike.net Fri Mar 26 08:02:52 2004
4607 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
4608 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4609 Subject: [IRCServices] .29 mlock issue
4610 Message-ID: <mailman.21.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4611
4612 I'd have to agree to the "don't do that" statement, it requires just a little bit of common sence, if you know chanserv isnt going to allow +m, dont set it in your +f. I dont think this requires removing support for MLOCK +f though, seems a bit drastic :p
4613
4614 /****************************************
4615 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4616 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4617 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4618 ****************************************/
4619
4620
4621 /****************************************
4622 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
4623 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4624 * Sent - 2004-03-26 18:45:08
4625 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] .29 mlock issue
4626 ****************************************/
4627
4628 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
4629
4630 > Given the complexity of Unreal's +f mode, I don't really see checking
4631 >this programatically as feasible; the simple answer is "don't do that". If
4632 >it causes too many problems, I'll just remove MLOCK +f support entirely.
4633 >
4634 > --Andrew Church
4635 > achurch@achurch.org
4636 > http://achurch.org/
4637 >
4638 >>
4639 >>hi,
4640 >>
4641 >>chanserv allows you to mlock -modes that gets +'d with channel mode +f.
4642 >>
4643 >>/msg chanserv set #channel mlock +ntSNT-miC+f
4644 >>[7c#C5,10j#i10,10k#K10,5m#m2]:10
4645 >>
4646 >>for example, it allows you to add -m and +m (inside +f) rendering the mode
4647 >>useless.
4648 >>
4649 >>-- example --
4650 >>[11:32] <asdsd> 1 sadfasdfasdfasdf
4651 >>[11:32] <asdsd> 2 dsfsdfgsdfgsdfgsdf
4652 >>[11:32] <asdsd> 3 ghndghndghngdhngfhngf
4653 >>[11:32] <asdsd> 4 dfghnjhfgjhfkjhjkgh
4654 >>[11:32] <asdsd> 5 dfgsdfgsdfgdsfgsdfg
4655 >>[11:32] <asdsd> 6 dfgdsafgsdfgfsghfdgh
4656 >>[11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (TriGun.ShadowFire.ORG!) +m
4657 >>[11:32] [mode:#shadowfire] (ChanServ!services@shadowfire.org) -m
4658 >>[11:32] <asdsd> 11 fhdghjfhljgjkglki./hkl
4659 >>-- /example --
4660 >>
4661 >>will it be possible to add more strict checking when adding mlocks with
4662 >>+f?
4663 >>
4664 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
4665 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4666 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4667 >
4668 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4669 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4670 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4671 >.
4672
4673 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
4674
4675
4676
4677
4678 From nick at nickgawronski.com Fri Mar 26 16:15:39 2004
4679 From: nick at nickgawronski.com (Nick Gawronski)
4680 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4681 Subject: [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
4682 Message-ID: <001901c41390$a322c600$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
4683
4684 Hi, One new server that Andy might want to consider writing for ircservices
4685 is fileserv that could send files to users with dcc and optionally receive
4686 files so if the irc admins wanted to write documents on their irc network or
4687 distribute demos of irc clients users could download them easily with out
4688 leaving irc with just /msg fileserv get file This server would be very
4689 useful for server admins who don't want to setup a bot just for file use and
4690 fileserv could be a module so if admins did not want it they would not need
4691 to use it. bye
4692 My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
4693 Use paypal for your payments!
4694 https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
4695
4696
4697
4698 From Craig at chatspike.net Fri Mar 26 16:22:21 2004
4699 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
4700 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4701 Subject: [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
4702 Message-ID: <mailman.22.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4703
4704 i'll quote what i said last time you asked for this..
4705
4706 It would have to be coded as a module, Services does support the CTCP, however, without oppening certain ports, it wont be able to accept DCCs. So this would require a significant ammount of coding.
4707
4708 Please dont re-post previous topics to the list. Its irritating, if you dont get a responce the first time (which you did) then it probably wont be concidered, or no one has anything to say about it.
4709
4710 /****************************************
4711 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4712 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4713 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4714 ****************************************/
4715
4716
4717 /****************************************
4718 * From - Nick Gawronski <nick@nickgawronski.com>
4719 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4720 * Sent - 2004-03-27 00:15:39
4721 * Subject - [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
4722 ****************************************/
4723
4724 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
4725
4726 >Hi, One new server that Andy might want to consider writing for ircservices
4727 >is fileserv that could send files to users with dcc and optionally receive
4728 >files so if the irc admins wanted to write documents on their irc network or
4729 >distribute demos of irc clients users could download them easily with out
4730 >leaving irc with just /msg fileserv get file This server would be very
4731 >useful for server admins who don't want to setup a bot just for file use and
4732 >fileserv could be a module so if admins did not want it they would not need
4733 >to use it. bye
4734 >My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
4735 >Use paypal for your payments!
4736 >https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
4737 >
4738 >
4739 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4740 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4741 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4742 >.
4743
4744 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
4745
4746
4747
4748
4749 From horizon at regina.sask.cc Fri Mar 26 16:28:00 2004
4750 From: horizon at regina.sask.cc (Horizon)
4751 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4752 Subject: [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
4753 In-Reply-To: <001901c41390$a322c600$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
4754 References: <001901c41390$a322c600$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
4755 Message-ID: <34179.24.72.30.62.1080347280.squirrel@webmail.projectjones.com>
4756
4757 I think that might be what a MOTD or is for IMO :-) I can also see a lot
4758 of ways to abuse this proposed service in theory. Bad idea if you ask me.
4759
4760
4761 Alex
4762
4763
4764
4765 > Hi, One new server that Andy might want to consider writing for
4766 > ircservices
4767 > is fileserv that could send files to users with dcc and optionally receive
4768 > files so if the irc admins wanted to write documents on their irc network
4769 > or
4770 > distribute demos of irc clients users could download them easily with out
4771 > leaving irc with just /msg fileserv get file This server would be very
4772 > useful for server admins who don't want to setup a bot just for file use
4773 > and
4774 > fileserv could be a module so if admins did not want it they would not
4775 > need
4776 > to use it. bye
4777 > My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
4778 > Use paypal for your payments!
4779 > https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
4780 >
4781 >
4782 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4783 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4784 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4785 >
4786 >
4787
4788
4789
4790 From horizon at regina.sask.cc Fri Mar 26 16:28:00 2004
4791 From: horizon at regina.sask.cc (Horizon)
4792 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4793 Subject: [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
4794 In-Reply-To: <001901c41390$a322c600$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
4795 References: <001901c41390$a322c600$210110ac@chihuahuad1>
4796 Message-ID: <34179.24.72.30.62.1080347280.squirrel@webmail.projectjones.com>
4797
4798 I think that might be what a MOTD or is for IMO :-) I can also see a lot
4799 of ways to abuse this proposed service in theory. Bad idea if you ask me.
4800
4801
4802 Alex
4803
4804
4805
4806 > Hi, One new server that Andy might want to consider writing for
4807 > ircservices
4808 > is fileserv that could send files to users with dcc and optionally receive
4809 > files so if the irc admins wanted to write documents on their irc network
4810 > or
4811 > distribute demos of irc clients users could download them easily with out
4812 > leaving irc with just /msg fileserv get file This server would be very
4813 > useful for server admins who don't want to setup a bot just for file use
4814 > and
4815 > fileserv could be a module so if admins did not want it they would not
4816 > need
4817 > to use it. bye
4818 > My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
4819 > Use paypal for your payments!
4820 > https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
4821 >
4822 >
4823 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4824 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4825 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4826 >
4827 >
4828
4829
4830
4831 From idontwantthisshit at hotmail.com Fri Mar 26 16:33:11 2004
4832 From: idontwantthisshit at hotmail.com (DeadNotBuried .)
4833 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4834 Subject: [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
4835 Message-ID: <BAY1-F36Jb0DdNoTkMC00011c85@hotmail.com>
4836
4837 i think it could end up slowing services down too much and eggdrops work
4838 fine as file servers, and if not wanting a file server on then don't have to
4839 load it into the eggdrop, just have the bot log onto the network as FileServ
4840 most users wouldn't know the difference
4841
4842 >
4843 >I think that might be what a MOTD or is for IMO :-) I can also see a lot
4844 >of ways to abuse this proposed service in theory. Bad idea if you ask me.
4845 >
4846 >
4847 >Alex
4848 >
4849 >
4850 >
4851 > > Hi, One new server that Andy might want to consider writing for
4852 > > ircservices
4853 > > is fileserv that could send files to users with dcc and optionally
4854 >receive
4855 > > files so if the irc admins wanted to write documents on their irc
4856 >network
4857 > > or
4858 > > distribute demos of irc clients users could download them easily with
4859 >out
4860 > > leaving irc with just /msg fileserv get file This server would be very
4861 > > useful for server admins who don't want to setup a bot just for file use
4862 > > and
4863 > > fileserv could be a module so if admins did not want it they would not
4864 > > need
4865 > > to use it. bye
4866 > > My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
4867 > > Use paypal for your payments!
4868 > > https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
4869 > >
4870 > >
4871 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4872 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4873 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4874 > >
4875 > >
4876 >
4877 >
4878 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4879 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4880 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4881
4882 _________________________________________________________________
4883 Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Go to
4884 http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp?banner=emailtag&referrer=hotmail
4885
4886
4887
4888 From Craig at chatspike.net Sat Mar 27 04:37:22 2004
4889 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
4890 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4891 Subject: [IRCServices] Perl Script for Encrypting Passwords..
4892 Message-ID: <mailman.23.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
4893
4894 I can remember reading a while back that someone made a perl script which would go thru the services databases, and encrypt the passwords, i've searched the archives, but have failed to find it. Does anyone have this around somewhere, if so, could you put it on the list? thanks
4895
4896 /****************************************
4897 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4898 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4899 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4900 ****************************************/
4901
4902
4903
4904 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Mar 27 06:40:45 2004
4905 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
4906 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4907 Subject: [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
4908 Message-ID: <200403271440.i2REejY28966@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
4909
4910 euhhh.... why not just call it 'warez-serv'? :/
4911
4912 >i think it could end up slowing services down too much and eggdrops work
4913 >fine as file servers, and if not wanting a file server on then don't have to
4914 >load it into the eggdrop, just have the bot log onto the network as FileServ
4915 >most users wouldn't know the difference
4916 >
4917 >>
4918 >>I think that might be what a MOTD or is for IMO :-) I can also see a lot
4919 >>of ways to abuse this proposed service in theory. Bad idea if you ask me.
4920 >>
4921 >>
4922 >>Alex
4923 >>
4924 >>
4925 >>
4926 >> > Hi, One new server that Andy might want to consider writing for
4927 >> > ircservices
4928 >> > is fileserv that could send files to users with dcc and optionally
4929 >>receive
4930 >> > files so if the irc admins wanted to write documents on their irc
4931 >>network
4932 >> > or
4933 >> > distribute demos of irc clients users could download them easily with
4934 >>out
4935 >> > leaving irc with just /msg fileserv get file This server would be very
4936 >> > useful for server admins who don't want to setup a bot just for file use
4937 >> > and
4938 >> > fileserv could be a module so if admins did not want it they would not
4939 >> > need
4940 >> > to use it. bye
4941 >> > My web page is at http://www.nickgawronski.com
4942 >> > Use paypal for your payments!
4943 >> > https://www.paypal.com/us/mrb/pal=GXD4F3JGPXJZG
4944 >> >
4945 >> >
4946 >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4947 >> > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4948 >> > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4949 >> >
4950 >> >
4951 >>
4952 >>
4953 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
4954 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4955 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4956 >
4957 >_________________________________________________________________
4958 >Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Go to
4959 >http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp?banner=emailtag&referrer=hotmail
4960 >
4961 >
4962 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4963 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4964 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4965
4966
4967
4968 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Sat Mar 27 10:59:41 2004
4969 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
4970 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4971 Subject: [IRCServices] Translate
4972 Message-ID: <20040327185941.39635.qmail@web86103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
4973
4974 I want to translate the irc services to the greek
4975 language. Can anyone tell me all the files i have to translate?
4976
4977 =====
4978 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
4979
4980
4981
4982 From quension at mac.com Sat Mar 27 14:17:40 2004
4983 From: quension at mac.com (Trevor Talbot)
4984 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
4985 Subject: [IRCServices] Perl Script for Encrypting Passwords..
4986 In-Reply-To: <200403271239.i2RCdoIk023362@mac.com>
4987 Message-ID: <8FA5F71E-803C-11D8-8589-0003938D6866@mac.com>
4988
4989 -----
4990 From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
4991 Date: Wed Sep 17, 2003 07:27:17 US/Pacific
4992 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
4993 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Database encryption
4994
4995 This isn't possible at the moment. I'm hoping to make it possible
4996 for 5.1. In the meantime, you can export to XML and encrypt the
4997 passwords manually. Something like the following Perl snippet
4998 (pseudocode) should do it:
4999
5000 undef $/;
5001 $data = <XML>;
5002 s,<pass>([\0-\377]*?)</pass>,"<pass>".&escape(&md5($1))."</pass>",eg;
5003 print NEWXML $data;
5004
5005 where &md5 is a subroutine that returns the MD5 hash of its parameter
5006 (raw binary, not hex string), and &escape turns non-ASCII characters
5007 into &#nnn; entities.
5008
5009 --Andrew Church
5010 achurch@achurch.org
5011 http://achurch.org/
5012
5013 > Hello all,
5014 > I have a simple question that I can't seem to find the answer to. How
5015 > can I convert the my services database to use MD5? Just enabling
5016 > encryption/md 5 breaks it. :/
5017 > Jeian/John
5018 -----
5019
5020
5021
5022 From Craig at chatspike.net Sat Mar 27 17:32:22 2004
5023 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
5024 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5025 Subject: [IRCServices] Translate
5026 Message-ID: <mailman.24.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5027
5028 you should probably just need the en_us language file from ./lang
5029
5030 note all the warnings and cautions in it thou :)
5031
5032 /****************************************
5033 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5034 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
5035 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
5036 ****************************************/
5037
5038
5039 /****************************************
5040 * From - Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
5041 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5042 * Sent - 2004-03-27 18:59:41
5043 * Subject - [IRCServices] Translate
5044 ****************************************/
5045
5046 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
5047
5048 >I want to translate the irc services to the greek
5049 >language. Can anyone tell me all the files i have to translate?
5050 >
5051 >=====
5052 >Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
5053 >
5054 >
5055 >------------------------------------------------------------------
5056 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5057 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5058 >.
5059
5060 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
5061
5062
5063
5064
5065 From Craig at chatspike.net Sat Mar 27 17:34:55 2004
5066 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
5067 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5068 Subject: [IRCServices] Perl Script for Encrypting Passwords..
5069 Message-ID: <mailman.25.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5070
5071 Ok, thanks. I'll concider creating a small 'one-run' module, that lets the chanserv and nickserv protocol load, runs thru the structs MD5ing the passwords, then makes services quit. I dunno the ETA for this mod, but i have a lot of things to finish before i concider it :/
5072
5073 /****************************************
5074 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5075 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
5076 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
5077 ****************************************/
5078
5079
5080 /****************************************
5081 * From - Trevor Talbot <quension@mac.com>
5082 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5083 * Sent - 2004-03-27 23:17:40
5084 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Perl Script for Encrypting Passwords..
5085 ****************************************/
5086
5087 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
5088
5089 >-----
5090 >From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5091 >Date: Wed Sep 17, 2003 07:27:17 US/Pacific
5092 >To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
5093 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Database encryption
5094 >
5095 > This isn't possible at the moment. I'm hoping to make it possible
5096 >for 5.1. In the meantime, you can export to XML and encrypt the
5097 >passwords manually. Something like the following Perl snippet
5098 >(pseudocode) should do it:
5099 >
5100 > undef $/;
5101 > $data = <XML>;
5102 > s,<pass>([\0-\377]*?)</pass>,"<pass>".&escape(&md5($1))."</pass>",eg;
5103 > print NEWXML $data;
5104 >
5105 >where &md5 is a subroutine that returns the MD5 hash of its parameter
5106 >(raw binary, not hex string), and &escape turns non-ASCII characters
5107 >into &#nnn; entities.
5108 >
5109 > --Andrew Church
5110 > achurch@achurch.org
5111 > http://achurch.org/
5112 >
5113 >> Hello all,
5114 >> I have a simple question that I can't seem to find the answer to. How
5115 >> can I convert the my services database to use MD5? Just enabling
5116 >> encryption/md 5 breaks it. :/
5117 >> Jeian/John
5118 >-----
5119 >
5120 >
5121 >------------------------------------------------------------------
5122 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5123 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5124 >.
5125
5126 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
5127
5128
5129
5130
5131 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Sun Mar 28 22:49:18 2004
5132 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
5133 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5134 Subject: [IRCServices] new server for ircservices
5135 In-Reply-To: <200403270034.i2R0YjgD022591@mx4.wm.co.za>
5136 Message-ID: <web-269858833@mail01.infosat.net>
5137
5138 Use EggDrop or something similar for file services. I don't
5139 see any need for Services to have this feature (and
5140 seemingly neither do any of the _other_ services proggie
5141 coders).
5142 __________________________________________________________________________
5143 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
5144
5145
5146 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Mar 29 04:19:20 2004
5147 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
5148 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5149 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible bug "command unavailable"
5150 Message-ID: <200403291219.i2TCJKY17093@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
5151
5152 Seems that on a large channel (>500 users) the op/voice etc commands stop working (no, they havent been disabled) - digging into the source i find that this happens when memory allocation and system calls etc fail:
5153
5154 [12:49pm] *ChanServ* Sorry, the OP command is temporarily unavailable.
5155
5156 We've just moved the services to a different machine so it isnt the machine services are running on, this was happening before.
5157
5158 Any ideas?
5159
5160 Thanks,
5161 Brain
5162
5163
5164
5165 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Mar 29 04:25:18 2004
5166 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
5167 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5168 Subject: [IRCServices] Fw: Possible bug "command unavailable"
5169 Message-ID: <200403291225.i2TCPIY17207@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
5170
5171 Sorry for my hasty bug report, seems this has to do with "BOUNCY_MODES"... and im looking into it now ;)
5172
5173
5174 --- Original ---
5175
5176 Seems that on a large channel (>500 users) the op/voice etc commands stop working (no, they havent been disabled) - digging into the source i find that this happens when memory allocation and system calls etc fail:
5177
5178 [12:49pm] *ChanServ* Sorry, the OP command is temporarily unavailable.
5179
5180 We've just moved the services to a different machine so it isnt the machine services are running on, this was happening before.
5181
5182 Any ideas?
5183
5184 Thanks,
5185 Brain
5186
5187
5188
5189 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Tue Mar 30 03:34:24 2004
5190 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
5191 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5192 Subject: [IRCServices] Auspice conversion and channel entry messages
5193 In-Reply-To: <200403301001.i2UA1Y1M022891@mx3.wm.co.za>
5194 Message-ID: <web-271186648@mail01.infosat.net>
5195
5196 I was helping a friend of mine convert an Auspice 2.8
5197 database to IRC Services (5.0.29) - we noticed that channel
5198 entry messages are not imported. Is it possible for this to
5199 be either fixed or documented?
5200
5201 EDIT: I went off to the manual just before I was about to
5202 send this. It says: "Services uses a different news system
5203 than Auspice; network and channel news items will not be
5204 converted." Does this cover what I just mentioned? If so,
5205 maybe it could be better documented...
5206 __________________________________________________________________________
5207 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
5208
5209
5210 From byteripper01 at hotmail.com Tue Mar 30 04:30:31 2004
5211 From: byteripper01 at hotmail.com (Byte Ripper)
5212 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5213 Subject: [IRCServices] Problems at starting up services
5214 Message-ID: <BAY15-F66eXEev8uEbJ0001ef4f@hotmail.com>
5215
5216 Hi
5217
5218 I'm using Unrealircd 3.2 RC2 and ircservices 5.0.0.29 on an debian box.
5219 So far everything should be configured right but when i try to start the
5220 services i get some errors.
5221 Maybe someone can tell me where the problem is.
5222
5223 Debug Log:
5224
5225 [Mar 30 14:28:16.425021 2004] IRC Services 5.0.29 starting up (options:
5226 debug)
5227 [Mar 30 14:28:16.425258 2004] debug: Loading language 0 from file
5228 `languages/en_us'
5229 [Mar 30 14:28:16.426049 2004] debug: Loading language 10 from file
5230 `languages/nl'
5231 [Mar 30 14:28:16.426883 2004] debug: Loading language 6 from file
5232 `languages/fr'
5233 [Mar 30 14:28:16.427807 2004] debug: Loading language 9 from file
5234 `languages/de'
5235 [Mar 30 14:28:16.428655 2004] debug: Loading language 11 from file
5236 `languages/hu'
5237 [Mar 30 14:28:16.429499 2004] debug: Loading language 8 from file
5238 `languages/it'
5239 [Mar 30 14:28:16.430045 2004] debug: Loading language 2 from file
5240 `languages/ja_euc'
5241 [Mar 30 14:28:16.430850 2004] debug: Loading language 3 from file
5242 `languages/ja_sjis'
5243 [Mar 30 14:28:16.431597 2004] debug: Loading language 5 from file
5244 `languages/pt'
5245 [Mar 30 14:28:16.432204 2004] debug: Loading language 4 from file
5246 `languages/es'
5247 [Mar 30 14:28:16.433087 2004] debug: Loading language 7 from file
5248 `languages/tr'
5249 [Mar 30 14:28:16.434113 2004] debug: Loaded languages
5250 [Mar 30 14:28:16.434214 2004] debug: Loading module `protocol/unreal'
5251 [Mar 30 14:28:16.435427 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5252 `protocol/unreal'
5253 [Mar 30 14:28:16.435504 2004] debug: Loading module `database/version4'
5254 [Mar 30 14:28:16.436671 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5255 `database/version4'
5256 [Mar 30 14:28:16.436727 2004] debug: Loading module `mail/main'
5257 [Mar 30 14:28:16.436931 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module `mail/main'
5258 [Mar 30 14:28:16.436981 2004] debug: Loading module `mail/sendmail'
5259 [Mar 30 14:28:16.437193 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5260 `mail/sendmail'
5261 [Mar 30 14:28:16.437244 2004] debug: Loading module `operserv/main'
5262 [Mar 30 14:28:16.437758 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5263 `operserv/main'
5264 [Mar 30 14:28:16.437812 2004] debug: Loading module `operserv/akill'
5265 [Mar 30 14:28:16.438212 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5266 `operserv/akill'
5267 [Mar 30 14:28:16.438264 2004] debug: Loading module `operserv/news'
5268 [Mar 30 14:28:16.438594 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5269 `operserv/news'
5270 [Mar 30 14:28:16.438645 2004] debug: Loading module `operserv/sessions'
5271 [Mar 30 14:28:16.439073 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5272 `operserv/sessions'
5273 [Mar 30 14:28:16.439124 2004] debug: Loading module `operserv/sline'
5274 [Mar 30 14:28:16.439595 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5275 `operserv/sline'
5276 [Mar 30 14:28:16.439648 2004] debug: Loading module `nickserv/main'
5277 [Mar 30 14:28:16.441240 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5278 `nickserv/main'
5279 [Mar 30 14:28:16.441306 2004] debug: Loading module `nickserv/access'
5280 [Mar 30 14:28:16.441807 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5281 `nickserv/access'
5282 [Mar 30 14:28:16.441860 2004] debug: Loading module `nickserv/link'
5283 [Mar 30 14:28:16.442374 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5284 `nickserv/link'
5285 [Mar 30 14:28:16.442426 2004] debug: Loading module `nickserv/mail-auth'
5286 [Mar 30 14:28:16.442961 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5287 `nickserv/mail-auth'
5288 [Mar 30 14:28:16.443012 2004] debug: Loading module `nickserv/sendpass'
5289 [Mar 30 14:28:16.443563 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5290 `nickserv/sendpass'
5291 [Mar 30 14:28:16.443616 2004] debug: Loading module `chanserv/main'
5292 [Mar 30 14:28:16.445107 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5293 `chanserv/main'
5294 [Mar 30 14:28:16.445177 2004] debug: Loading module `chanserv/access-levels'
5295 [Mar 30 14:28:16.446038 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5296 `chanserv/access-levels'
5297 [Mar 30 14:28:16.446091 2004] debug: Loading module `chanserv/sendpass'
5298 [Mar 30 14:28:16.446679 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5299 `chanserv/sendpass'
5300 [Mar 30 14:28:16.446731 2004] debug: Loading module `memoserv/main'
5301 [Mar 30 14:28:16.447429 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5302 `memoserv/main'
5303 [Mar 30 14:28:16.447482 2004] debug: Loading module `memoserv/forward'
5304 [Mar 30 14:28:16.448105 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5305 `memoserv/forward'
5306 [Mar 30 14:28:16.448159 2004] debug: Loading module `memoserv/ignore'
5307 [Mar 30 14:28:16.448782 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5308 `memoserv/ignore'
5309 [Mar 30 14:28:16.448834 2004] debug: Loading module `statserv/main'
5310 [Mar 30 14:28:16.449574 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5311 `statserv/main'
5312 [Mar 30 14:28:16.449626 2004] debug: Loading module `misc/helpserv'
5313 [Mar 30 14:28:16.450407 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5314 `misc/helpserv'
5315 [Mar 30 14:28:16.450459 2004] debug: Loading module `misc/xml-export'
5316 [Mar 30 14:28:16.451262 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5317 `misc/xml-export'
5318 [Mar 30 14:28:16.451314 2004] debug: Loading module `misc/xml-import'
5319 [Mar 30 14:28:16.452443 2004] debug: Successfully loaded module
5320 `misc/xml-import'
5321 [Mar 30 14:28:16.452497 2004] debug: Loaded modules
5322 [Mar 30 14:28:16.463773 2004] Initiated connection to 127.0.0.1:5000
5323 [Mar 30 14:28:16.463966 2004] debug: Sent: PROTOCTL SJOIN SJOIN2 SJ3 NICKv2
5324 VHP VL NOQUIT UMODE2 TOKEN
5325 [Mar 30 14:28:16.464065 2004] debug: Sent: PASS :XXXXXXX
5326 [Mar 30 14:28:16.464154 2004] debug: Sent: SERVER services.217.20.123.236 1
5327 :U0-*-2 Services for IRC Networks
5328 [Mar 30 14:28:16.464323 2004] debug: Sent: :services.217.20.123.236 TSCTL
5329 SVSTIME 1080649696
5330 [Mar 30 14:28:16.464444 2004] debug: Sent: NICK OperServ 1 1080649696
5331 services 217.20.113.234 services.217.20.113.234 0 +oiSqd 217.20.123.236
5332 :Operator Server
5333 [Mar 30 14:28:16.464557 2004] debug: Sent: NICK Global 1 1080649696 services
5334 217.20.113.234 services.217.20.113.234 0 +oiSqd 217.20.113.234 :Global
5335 Noticer
5336 [Mar 30 14:28:16.464773 2004] debug: Sent: NICK NickServ 1 1080649696
5337 services 217.20.113.234 services.217.20.113.234 0 +oSqd 217.20.123.236
5338 :Nickname Server
5339 [Mar 30 14:28:16.464933 2004] debug: Sent: NICK ChanServ 1 1080649696
5340 services 217.20.113.234 services.217.20.113.234 0 +oSqd 217.20.123.236
5341 :Channel Server
5342 [Mar 30 14:28:16.465021 2004] debug: Sent: NICK MemoServ 1 1080649696
5343 services 217.20.113.234 services.217.20.113.234 0 +oSqd 217.20.123.236 :Memo
5344 Server
5345 [Mar 30 14:28:16.465114 2004] debug: Sent: NICK StatServ 1 1080649696
5346 services 217.20.113.234 services.217.20.113.234 0 +iSqd 217.20.123.236
5347 :Statistics Server
5348 [Mar 30 14:28:16.465196 2004] debug: Sent: NICK HelpServ 1 1080649696
5349 services 217.20.113.234 services.217.20.113.234 0 +Sqd 217.20.123.236 :Help
5350 Server
5351 [Mar 30 14:28:16.465285 2004] debug: Received: :irc.xxx.xxx.cx NOTICE AUTH
5352 :*** Looking up your hostname...
5353 [Mar 30 14:28:16.465413 2004] debug: Saving databases
5354 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467260 2004] Read error from server: Broken pipe
5355 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467346 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-import'
5356 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467489 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-export'
5357 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467588 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
5358 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467686 2004] debug: Unloading module `statserv/main'
5359 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467805 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/ignore'
5360 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467900 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/forward'
5361 [Mar 30 14:28:16.467996 2004] debug: Unloading module `memoserv/main'
5362 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468098 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/sendpass'
5363 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468202 2004] debug: Unloading module
5364 `chanserv/access-levels'
5365 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468297 2004] debug: Unloading module `chanserv/main'
5366 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468435 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/sendpass'
5367 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468530 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/mail-auth'
5368 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468636 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/link'
5369 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468730 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/access'
5370 [Mar 30 14:28:16.468824 2004] debug: Unloading module `nickserv/main'
5371 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469049 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sline'
5372 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469152 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/sessions'
5373 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469263 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/news'
5374 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469358 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/akill'
5375 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469467 2004] debug: Unloading module `operserv/main'
5376 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469571 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/sendmail'
5377 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469665 2004] debug: Unloading module `mail/main'
5378 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469756 2004] debug: Unloading module `database/version4'
5379 [Mar 30 14:28:16.469865 2004] debug: Unloading module `protocol/unreal'
5380 [Mar 30 12:28:16.470211 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
5381 [Mar 30 12:28:16.470324 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
5382 while shutting down
5383
5384 _________________________________________________________________
5385 Messenger? - ?Wer in Echtzeit kommunizieren will, l?dt den MSN Messenger.
5386 Cool, kostenlos und mit 3D Emoticons: http://messenger.msn.de
5387
5388
5389
5390 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Mar 30 21:59:51 2004
5391 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5392 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5393 Subject: [IRCServices] Auspice conversion and channel entry messages
5394 In-Reply-To: <web-271186648@mail01.infosat.net>
5395 Message-ID: <40696f87.43566@achurch.org>
5396
5397 As you yourself mention, this is documented using the same terminology
5398 Auspice uses, "channel news." If that confuses you, that's not my problem.
5399
5400 --Andrew Church
5401 achurch@achurch.org
5402 http://achurch.org/
5403
5404 >I was helping a friend of mine convert an Auspice 2.8
5405 >database to IRC Services (5.0.29) - we noticed that channel
5406 >entry messages are not imported. Is it possible for this to
5407 >be either fixed or documented?
5408 >
5409 >EDIT: I went off to the manual just before I was about to
5410 >send this. It says: "Services uses a different news system
5411 >than Auspice; network and channel news items will not be
5412 >converted." Does this cover what I just mentioned? If so,
5413 >maybe it could be better documented...
5414 >__________________________________________________________________________
5415 >http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
5416 >
5417 >------------------------------------------------------------------
5418 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5419 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5420
5421
5422 From azoff at se.linux.org Tue Mar 30 05:32:11 2004
5423 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
5424 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5425 Subject: [IRCServices] Problems at starting up services
5426 In-Reply-To: <BAY15-F66eXEev8uEbJ0001ef4f@hotmail.com>
5427 References: <BAY15-F66eXEev8uEbJ0001ef4f@hotmail.com>
5428 Message-ID: <406976DB.3090903@se.linux.org>
5429
5430 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5431 Hash: SHA1
5432
5433 Byte Ripper wrote:
5434 | Hi
5435 |
5436 | I'm using Unrealircd 3.2 RC2 and ircservices 5.0.0.29 on an debian box.
5437 | So far everything should be configured right but when i try to start the
5438 | services i get some errors.
5439 | Maybe someone can tell me where the problem is.
5440
5441 Can you enable coredump when you compile ircservices? (./configure --help)
5442
5443 Then, please read the webbpage about how to backtrace.
5444
5445 Regards,
5446 - --
5447 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
5448 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
5449 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
5450 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
5451
5452 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
5453 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
5454 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
5455
5456 iD8DBQFAaXbbeY7jmtvbDP0RAqv4AJ0Q5xjI5h8q1a9ny8XtlhzWQ0lpmQCgob0b
5457 0mKtIJFNaBQUu7Daj2+uAnQ=
5458 =loWC
5459 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
5460
5461
5462 From cpuman2000 at hotmail.com Tue Mar 30 20:34:02 2004
5463 From: cpuman2000 at hotmail.com (CPUMAN)
5464 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5465 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible Channel Expiration Bug
5466 Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV48uCBcKfEx00004be7@hotmail.com>
5467
5468 I've had two different channels report that there channel have inexplicable expired. When the owner said that they had identified for their nickname and were on the channel several times a week which should mean it is impossible for the channel to expire since the limit is set at 14 days. Just to be sure I went and checked the logs and sure enough they were identifying for their nicks but yet the log still showed the channel as expired. I also know for sure that the owners where actually in the channels. Um... I'm not sure what other information I can provide other then I'm running the latest version of services and they're running on a slack9 Linux box.
5469
5470 CPUMAN
5471 Network Administrator
5472 Serenia IRC Network
5473 irc.serenia.net
5474 -------------- next part --------------
5475 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
5476 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040330/08d4b82b/attachment.html
5477 From cpuman2000 at hotmail.com Tue Mar 30 20:46:25 2004
5478 From: cpuman2000 at hotmail.com (CPUMAN)
5479 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5480 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible Channel Expiration Bug
5481 References: <BAY12-DAV48uCBcKfEx00004be7@hotmail.com>
5482 Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV12uTnt4dx900009023@hotmail.com>
5483
5484 Also forgot to mention that on one channel the owner disabled auto-oping, auto-voicing, etc. I don't know about the other channel. I would imagine that disabling these auto modes shouldn't effect services recognizing if the channel has been used or not but I though it might be useful to mention.
5485
5486 CPUMAN
5487 Network Administrator
5488 Serenia IRC Network
5489 irc.serenia.net
5490 ----- Original Message -----
5491 From: CPUMAN
5492 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
5493 Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:34 PM
5494 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible Channel Expiration Bug
5495
5496
5497 I've had two different channels report that there channel have inexplicable expired. When the owner said that they had identified for their nickname and were on the channel several times a week which should mean it is impossible for the channel to expire since the limit is set at 14 days. Just to be sure I went and checked the logs and sure enough they were identifying for their nicks but yet the log still showed the channel as expired. I also know for sure that the owners where actually in the channels. Um... I'm not sure what other information I can provide other then I'm running the latest version of services and they're running on a slack9 Linux box.
5498
5499 CPUMAN
5500 Network Administrator
5501 Serenia IRC Network
5502 irc.serenia.net
5503
5504
5505 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5506
5507
5508 ------------------------------------------------------------------
5509 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5510 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5511 -------------- next part --------------
5512 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
5513 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040330/b0a1f928/attachment.htm
5514 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Tue Mar 30 22:59:21 2004
5515 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
5516 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5517 Subject: [IRCServices] Module request
5518 In-Reply-To: <200403301001.i2UA1Y1M022891@mx3.wm.co.za>
5519 Message-ID: <web-272104924@mail01.infosat.net>
5520
5521 http://www.servicescommunity.za.net/viewtopic.php?t=5
5522
5523 Anyone here prepared to help this guy out?
5524 __________________________________________________________________________
5525 http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
5526
5527
5528 From jamie at silverdream.org Wed Mar 31 02:46:15 2004
5529 From: jamie at silverdream.org (Jamie L. Penman-Smithson)
5530 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5531 Subject: [IRCServices] Module request
5532 In-Reply-To: <web-272104924@mail01.infosat.net>
5533 References: <web-272104924@mail01.infosat.net>
5534 Message-ID: <1080729974.3457.25.camel@oasis.silverdream.hq>
5535
5536 On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 07:59, Kieron Thwaites wrote:
5537 > http://www.servicescommunity.za.net/viewtopic.php?t=5
5538 >
5539 > Anyone here prepared to help this guy out?
5540
5541 If he wants help he can use the mailing list, and if he did use the
5542 mailing list, I'd say that such a module is a complete and utter waste
5543 of time..
5544
5545 --
5546 -jamie <jamie@silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam@silverdream.org
5547 w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms@silverdream.org
5548 pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key
5549 11:30:01 up 9:10, 3 users, load average: 0.13, 0.41, 0.34
5550 -------------- next part --------------
5551 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
5552 Name: not available
5553 Type: application/pgp-signature
5554 Size: 189 bytes
5555 Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
5556 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040331/fdc3511b/attachment.pgp
5557 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Mar 31 20:13:50 2004
5558 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5559 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5560 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible Channel Expiration Bug
5561 In-Reply-To: <BAY12-DAV12uTnt4dx900009023@hotmail.com>
5562 Message-ID: <406aaa44.47324@achurch.org>
5563
5564 >Also forgot to mention that on one channel the owner disabled =
5565 >auto-oping, auto-voicing, etc.
5566
5567 As section 3-2 of the manual states, channel activity is determined by
5568 whether auto-op users enter the channel; while it's not stated explicitly,
5569 this means that disabling auto-op also prevents the channel's last-used
5570 time from getting updated this way. The last-used time is also updated
5571 whenever the IDENTIFY or OP commands are used successfully; if neither of
5572 these commands are used within the expiration period, the channel will
5573 expire. This is not a bug; I've long been aware that it's not obvious or
5574 desirable behavior, but I've not been able to come up with a better system
5575 which retains fairness (for example, a random user or spambot entering a
5576 channel with no intent to use it as the founder intended should not cause
5577 the last-used time to be updated). Suggestions are welcome.
5578
5579 I'll update the manual for the next release to cover this issue more
5580 clearly.
5581
5582 --Andrew Church
5583 achurch@achurch.org
5584 http://achurch.org/
5585
5586
5587 From medice at gmx.at Wed Mar 31 04:16:14 2004
5588 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
5589 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5590 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible Channel Expiration Bug
5591 In-Reply-To: <406aaa44.47324@achurch.org>
5592 References: <406aaa44.47324@achurch.org>
5593 Message-ID: <406AB68E.3090403@gmx.at>
5594
5595 maybe it's also a good idea to enter a small line of explanation
5596 somewhere to the ircservices-help files, so the normal user usually
5597 reffering to the help and not the manual is aware of this fact (anyway
5598 it's imho rather senseless for founders to deal with channels without
5599 any single op...)
5600
5601 greets
5602 /medice
5603
5604
5605
5606 Andrew Church wrote:
5607
5608 > I'll update the manual for the next release to cover this issue more
5609 > clearly.
5610 >
5611 > --Andrew Church
5612 > achurch@achurch.org
5613 > http://achurch.org/
5614
5615
5616
5617
5618 From Craig at chatspike.net Wed Mar 31 05:10:15 2004
5619 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
5620 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5621 Subject: [IRCServices] Module request
5622 Message-ID: <mailman.26.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5623
5624 Replying now, Please Try and keep These requests off the mailing list.
5625
5626 /****************************************
5627 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5628 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
5629 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
5630 ****************************************/
5631
5632
5633 /****************************************
5634 * From - Kieron Thwaites <ron2k@webmail.co.za>
5635 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5636 * Sent - 2004-03-31 07:59:21
5637 * Subject - [IRCServices] Module request
5638 ****************************************/
5639
5640 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
5641
5642 >http://www.servicescommunity.za.net/viewtopic.php?t=5
5643 >
5644 >Anyone here prepared to help this guy out?
5645 >__________________________________________________________________________
5646 >http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price
5647 >
5648 >------------------------------------------------------------------
5649 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5650 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5651 >.
5652
5653 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
5654
5655
5656
5657
5658 From thekynanbud at yahoo.com Mon Apr 5 10:34:05 2004
5659 From: thekynanbud at yahoo.com (kynan lalone)
5660 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5661 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
5662 Message-ID: <20040405173405.27441.qmail@web60210.mail.yahoo.com>
5663
5664 I have scanned the mailing lists for this problem, and
5665 I see it is a common problem.. although solutions
5666 offered have not been helping.
5667
5668 I am using
5669 Unreal3.2-RC2fix build 1.1.1.1.2.1.2.36 2004/03/07
5670 22:25:59
5671 Slackware 9.1
5672 ircservices-5.0.29
5673
5674 My problem is this:
5675 When a registered nick is attempted to be used a
5676 message is thrown:
5677 -NickServ- This nickname is registered and protected.
5678 If it is your nickname, type /msg NickServ IDENTIFY
5679 password. Otherwise,
5680 +please choose a different nickname.
5681
5682 But that is it. There is no furtherer action taken.
5683 No one minute delay.. no kill.. no nickforce change
5684 action taken. Users have found this out pretty
5685 quickly during testing stages and have staged
5686 themselves to be other users.
5687
5688 NSForceNickChange is enabled in modules.conf
5689
5690 in unrealircd my U:lines are as follows:
5691 ulines {
5692 127.0.0.1;
5693 };
5694
5695 mail-auth is not enabled and will probably not. I
5696 have caught word that nsforcenickchange will only work
5697 once the user has authed, but it seems the users have
5698 authed although no auth command was sent by any user..
5699 demonstrated..
5700 -NickServ- Time registered: Mar 30 13:23:53 2004 CST
5701 If auth is the problem is there a way to tell the user
5702 to msg the auth code? It would be great if I could
5703 have both nsforcenickchange and msg auth code instead
5704 of email :)
5705 This is just a one server irc network, running both
5706 UnrealIRCd and ircservices. Everything seems to be
5707 working so far.. except this.
5708
5709 Help will be greatly appreciated as I have been at
5710 this problem for a long while.
5711
5712 Kynan
5713
5714 __________________________________
5715 Do you Yahoo!?
5716 Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
5717 http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
5718
5719
5720 From ircservices at tou.de Mon Apr 5 11:23:59 2004
5721 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
5722 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5723 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
5724 References: <20040405173405.27441.qmail@web60210.mail.yahoo.com>
5725 Message-ID: <0e3301c41b3b$5ca53d90$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
5726
5727 ----- Original Message -----
5728 From: "kynan lalone" <thekynanbud@yahoo.com>
5729 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5730 Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:34 PM
5731 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
5732
5733
5734 > -NickServ- This nickname is registered and protected.
5735 > If it is your nickname, type /msg NickServ IDENTIFY
5736 > password. Otherwise,
5737 > +please choose a different nickname.
5738
5739 > But that is it. There is no furtherer action taken.
5740
5741 This is correct, if the user's ident/host matches on any mask on the
5742 nick-accesslist (/nickserv help access) or if the kill-option is disabled
5743 (/nickserv help set kill).
5744 The module.conf-options NSDefKill, NSFirstAccessEnable and NSFirstAccessWild
5745 may also be interesting for you.
5746
5747 Wolle
5748
5749
5750
5751 From thekynanbud at yahoo.com Mon Apr 5 12:40:12 2004
5752 From: thekynanbud at yahoo.com (kynan lalone)
5753 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5754 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange&In-Reply-To=
5755 Message-ID: <20040405194013.67803.qmail@web60204.mail.yahoo.com>
5756
5757 Ok... I have done you have said and enabled these
5758 options...
5759
5760 Now the nick force change works... sort of...
5761 It says it's changing .. but doesn't eg
5762 NickServ: This nickname has been registered; you may
5763 not use it. Your nickname is now being changed to
5764 Guest350711211.
5765 <temporal> My nick hasn't changed
5766
5767 This only works with newly registered accounts
5768
5769 I removed nsforcechange as I thought there was some
5770 problem unrealircd's nickforcechange options... now
5771 the operation is quite sparatic
5772
5773 Sometimes you will killed. sometimes you will be told
5774 your nick is being changed and it isn't.. The only
5775 effective thing that ever happens if I am using epic,
5776 and epic detects that your nick is going to be changed
5777 or you are going to be killed and does it for you..
5778
5779
5780 How do I render this problem fixed?
5781
5782 __________________________________
5783 Do you Yahoo!?
5784 Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
5785 http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
5786
5787
5788 From derfy at derfy.net Mon Apr 5 13:52:16 2004
5789 From: derfy at derfy.net (Freddie Agricola)
5790 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5791 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange&In-Reply-To=
5792 In-Reply-To: <20040405194013.67803.qmail@web60204.mail.yahoo.com>
5793 References: <20040405194013.67803.qmail@web60204.mail.yahoo.com>
5794 Message-ID: <b2h3701gt9gvkcg6r1pvpt07j8m9juk2q7@4ax.com>
5795
5796 On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:40:12 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
5797
5798 >Ok... I have done you have said and enabled these
5799 >options...
5800 >
5801 >Now the nick force change works... sort of...
5802 >It says it's changing .. but doesn't eg
5803 >NickServ: This nickname has been registered; you may
5804 >not use it. Your nickname is now being changed to
5805 >Guest350711211.
5806 ><temporal> My nick hasn't changed
5807 >
5808 >This only works with newly registered accounts
5809 >
5810 >I removed nsforcechange as I thought there was some
5811 >problem unrealircd's nickforcechange options... now
5812 >the operation is quite sparatic
5813 >
5814 >Sometimes you will killed. sometimes you will be told
5815 >your nick is being changed and it isn't.. The only
5816 >effective thing that ever happens if I am using epic,
5817 >and epic detects that your nick is going to be changed
5818 >or you are going to be killed and does it for you..
5819 >
5820 >
5821 >How do I render this problem fixed?
5822 >
5823 ISTR this being a bug in the nick changing code. One of our resident
5824 coders on our network found the command being sent wasn't correct. The
5825 SVSNICK format wasn't correct. Check your ircservices.log for
5826 "permission denied, you are not an irc operator" directed to a server.
5827 Then look in your protocols/unreal/<some file, prolly nickserv.c> for
5828 the nick changing code. Oh, and know what you're doing, because I sure
5829 don't.
5830
5831
5832 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Mon Apr 5 14:00:54 2004
5833 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
5834 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5835 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange&In-Reply-To=
5836 In-Reply-To: <b2h3701gt9gvkcg6r1pvpt07j8m9juk2q7@4ax.com>
5837 References: <20040405194013.67803.qmail@web60204.mail.yahoo.com>
5838 <b2h3701gt9gvkcg6r1pvpt07j8m9juk2q7@4ax.com>
5839 Message-ID: <1081198854.5624.15.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
5840
5841 Actually,
5842
5843 "Permission denied" would not show that the SVSNICK line is wrong, BUT
5844 that an appropriate U:Line is missing.
5845
5846 maybe you sould add the NAME of the services server instead its ip
5847 address to "ulines {}" ?
5848
5849 Regards;
5850 yusuf
5851
5852 On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 22:52, Freddie Agricola wrote:
5853 > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:40:12 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
5854 >
5855 > >Ok... I have done you have said and enabled these
5856 > >options...
5857 > >
5858 > >Now the nick force change works... sort of...
5859 > >It says it's changing .. but doesn't eg
5860 > >NickServ: This nickname has been registered; you may
5861 > >not use it. Your nickname is now being changed to
5862 > >Guest350711211.
5863 > ><temporal> My nick hasn't changed
5864 > >
5865 > >This only works with newly registered accounts
5866 > >
5867 > >I removed nsforcechange as I thought there was some
5868 > >problem unrealircd's nickforcechange options... now
5869 > >the operation is quite sparatic
5870 > >
5871 > >Sometimes you will killed. sometimes you will be told
5872 > >your nick is being changed and it isn't.. The only
5873 > >effective thing that ever happens if I am using epic,
5874 > >and epic detects that your nick is going to be changed
5875 > >or you are going to be killed and does it for you..
5876 > >
5877 > >
5878 > >How do I render this problem fixed?
5879 > >
5880 > ISTR this being a bug in the nick changing code. One of our resident
5881 > coders on our network found the command being sent wasn't correct. The
5882 > SVSNICK format wasn't correct. Check your ircservices.log for
5883 > "permission denied, you are not an irc operator" directed to a server.
5884 > Then look in your protocols/unreal/<some file, prolly nickserv.c> for
5885 > the nick changing code. Oh, and know what you're doing, because I sure
5886 > don't.
5887 >
5888 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
5889 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5890 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5891
5892
5893
5894 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Apr 5 14:09:05 2004
5895 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
5896 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5897 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
5898 Message-ID: <mailman.27.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5899
5900 This is the answer you are looking for. U:Lines need the server NAME (ie, services.yournetwork.net) rather than the IP of the server.
5901
5902 So it should read something like:
5903
5904 ulines {
5905 services.yournetwork.net;
5906 };
5907
5908 (Please note these are only EXAMPLES, don't try using the addresses i've used else that wont work either :))
5909
5910 /****************************************
5911 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5912 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
5913 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
5914 ****************************************/
5915
5916
5917 /****************************************
5918 * From - Yusuf Iskenderoglu <uhc0@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
5919 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5920 * Sent - 2004-04-05 22:00:54
5921 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange&In-Reply-To=
5922 ****************************************/
5923
5924 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
5925
5926 >Actually,
5927 >
5928 >"Permission denied" would not show that the SVSNICK line is wrong, BUT
5929 >that an appropriate U:Line is missing.
5930 >
5931 >maybe you sould add the NAME of the services server instead its ip
5932 >address to "ulines {}" ?
5933 >
5934 >Regards;
5935 >yusuf
5936 >
5937 >On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 22:52, Freddie Agricola wrote:
5938 >> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:40:12 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
5939 >>
5940 >> >Ok... I have done you have said and enabled these
5941 >> >options...
5942 >> >
5943 >> >Now the nick force change works... sort of...
5944 >> >It says it's changing .. but doesn't eg
5945 >> >NickServ: This nickname has been registered; you may
5946 >> >not use it. Your nickname is now being changed to
5947 >> >Guest350711211.
5948 >> ><temporal> My nick hasn't changed
5949 >> >
5950 >> >This only works with newly registered accounts
5951 >> >
5952 >> >I removed nsforcechange as I thought there was some
5953 >> >problem unrealircd's nickforcechange options... now
5954 >> >the operation is quite sparatic
5955 >> >
5956 >> >Sometimes you will killed. sometimes you will be told
5957 >> >your nick is being changed and it isn't.. The only
5958 >> >effective thing that ever happens if I am using epic,
5959 >> >and epic detects that your nick is going to be changed
5960 >> >or you are going to be killed and does it for you..
5961 >> >
5962 >> >
5963 >> >How do I render this problem fixed?
5964 >> >
5965 >> ISTR this being a bug in the nick changing code. One of our resident
5966 >> coders on our network found the command being sent wasn't correct. The
5967 >> SVSNICK format wasn't correct. Check your ircservices.log for
5968 >> "permission denied, you are not an irc operator" directed to a server.
5969 >> Then look in your protocols/unreal/<some file, prolly nickserv.c> for
5970 >> the nick changing code. Oh, and know what you're doing, because I sure
5971 >> don't.
5972 >>
5973 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
5974 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5975 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5976 >
5977 >
5978 >------------------------------------------------------------------
5979 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5980 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5981 >.
5982
5983 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
5984
5985
5986
5987
5988 From admin at nevernet.net Mon Apr 5 22:07:29 2004
5989 From: admin at nevernet.net (Elijah)
5990 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
5991 Subject: [IRCServices] LISTCHANS Error
5992 Message-ID: <mailman.28.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
5993
5994 The following two users are on the Services Operator list. When doing LISTCHANS
5995 for their own nicknames, they are getting a "Permission Denied" response and
5996 then getting the normal output for LISTCHANS.
5997
5998 These users are unable to use LISTCHANS on other nicknames, which is correct
5999 behaviour according to the help information for this command.
6000
6001 It sort of makes sense why this happens as they are trying to use the command
6002 incorrectly. But it may be a bit confusing to have services return an error
6003 *and* the requested information. Is there any chance of just services just
6004 ignoring any input after LISTCHANS if the user does not have permission to use
6005 the LISTCHANS [nick] command and only returning information for the user's nick
6006 without an error?
6007
6008 Elijah
6009
6010 <r0wr> listchans r0wr
6011 <NickServ> Permission denied.
6012 <NickServ> Channels registered by r0wr:
6013 <NickServ> #Bots
6014 <NickServ> #Orkut
6015 <NickServ> #infection_help
6016 <NickServ> #r0wr
6017 <NickServ> End of list (4 channels registered).
6018
6019 <thain> listchans thain
6020 <NickServ> Permission denied.
6021 <NickServ> Channels registered by Thain:
6022 <NickServ> #gargle
6023 <NickServ> End of list (1 channels registered)..
6024 <NickServ> listchans r0wr
6025 <NickServ> Permission denied.
6026 <NickServ> Channels registered by Thain:
6027 <NickServ> #gargle
6028 <NickServ> End of list (1 channels registered)..
6029
6030
6031
6032
6033
6034 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Apr 6 14:37:57 2004
6035 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6036 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
6037 Subject: [IRCServices] LISTCHANS Error
6038 In-Reply-To: <40723ba8.31121@mail.achurch.org>
6039 Message-ID: <4072427b.52141@achurch.org>
6040
6041 ><r0wr> listchans r0wr
6042 ><NickServ> Permission denied.
6043 ><NickServ> Channels registered by r0wr:
6044
6045 Fixed, thanks for the report. (The intention was to abort after the
6046 error message; the code has been corrected to do this, except in the case
6047 where a non-servadmin operator gives their own nickname, in which case the
6048 list will be displayed as usual.)
6049
6050 --Andrew Church
6051 achurch@achurch.org
6052 http://achurch.org/
6053
6054
6055 From admin at nevernet.net Mon Apr 5 22:42:03 2004
6056 From: admin at nevernet.net (Elijah)
6057 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
6058 Subject: [IRCServices] LISTCHANS Error
6059 In-Reply-To: <4072427b.52141@achurch.org>
6060 Message-ID: <mailman.29.1098597724.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6061
6062 Thanks :)
6063
6064 -----Original Message-----
6065 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
6066 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Church
6067 Sent: Tuesday, 06 April, 2004 12:38 AM
6068 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
6069 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] LISTCHANS Error
6070
6071 ><r0wr> listchans r0wr
6072 ><NickServ> Permission denied.
6073 ><NickServ> Channels registered by r0wr:
6074
6075 Fixed, thanks for the report. (The intention was to abort after the
6076 error message; the code has been corrected to do this, except in the case
6077 where a non-servadmin operator gives their own nickname, in which case the
6078 list will be displayed as usual.)
6079
6080 --Andrew Church
6081 achurch@achurch.org
6082 http://achurch.org/
6083
6084 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6085 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6086 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6087
6088
6089
6090
6091
6092
6093
6094
6095 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Apr 6 14:55:33 2004
6096 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6097 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
6098 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug in 'CS info all'? (NS/CS-identifed founder)
6099 In-Reply-To: <039201c403ba$b83ad400$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
6100 Message-ID: <40724667.53065@achurch.org>
6101
6102 Fixed, thanks for the report.
6103
6104 --Andrew Church
6105 achurch@achurch.org
6106 http://achurch.org/
6107
6108 >Hi all,
6109 >
6110 >i'm not sure whether this is wanted behavior or simply a bug:
6111 >
6112 >The help for 'ChanServ INFO' says "If you are identified as the founder of
6113 >the channel you're getting information for and ALL is specified, the entry
6114 >message and successor will also be displayed.".
6115 >
6116 >But 'info all' only shows also extended information, if you have identified
6117 >with the chanpass for your channel. If you only identified for your
6118 >registered nick being founder of a channel, 'info all' doesn't show all
6119 >information for your own channel.
6120 >Since a "nick-identified founder" can change all the extra information 'cs
6121 >info all' shows (like successor, entrymsg etc.), i do not see any reason why
6122 >he shouldn't also could list these values.
6123 >
6124 >Wolfgang
6125 >
6126 >
6127 >------------------------------------------------------------------
6128 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6129 >http://lists.g1b50n.co.za/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6130
6131
6132 From thekynanbud at yahoo.com Tue Apr 6 06:18:59 2004
6133 From: thekynanbud at yahoo.com (kynan lalone)
6134 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
6135 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
6136 Message-ID: <20040406131859.32284.qmail@web60208.mail.yahoo.com>
6137
6138 Ok... Ok... This is becomming quite an issue :) Here
6139 is what I have done to fix using your suggestions, and
6140 here is the undesired results.
6141
6142 I changed
6143 link services.ircwayoxbay
6144 {
6145 username *;
6146 hostname localhost;
6147 bind-ip *;
6148 port 7029;
6149 leaf *;
6150 password-connect "LiNK";
6151 password-receive "LiNK";
6152 class servers;
6153 options {
6154 /*
6155 autoconnect;
6156 ssl;
6157 zip;
6158 */
6159 };
6160 };
6161
6162
6163 and..
6164
6165
6166 ulines {
6167 localhost;
6168 };
6169
6170 (Notice the only changes were changing 127.0.0.1 to
6171 localhost as the last suggestion was ulines needed a
6172 hostname, not an IP)
6173
6174 and Now the results are:
6175 My nick is still not changed/and I am not killed
6176 (unless a client such as epic changes itself) After
6177 my nick isn't changed, I can change it to another
6178 nick... and then try to change it back but the the
6179 server says its inuse. After a quick /whois I get
6180 *** temporal is enforcer@ircwayoxbay (NickServ
6181 Enforcement)
6182 *** on irc via server services.ircwayoxbay
6183 (IRCWAY_OXBAY Services)
6184 *** temporal : End of /WHOIS list.
6185 I thought enforcer was only for when NickServ was in
6186 use by a user when services restarted...... confusing?
6187 yes.
6188
6189 Truly yours - more and more confused daily,
6190 Kynan.
6191
6192 __________________________________
6193 Do you Yahoo!?
6194 Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
6195 http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
6196
6197
6198 From brain at winbot.co.uk Tue Apr 6 08:06:21 2004
6199 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
6200 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
6201 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
6202 Message-ID: <200404061506.i36F6Lv26049@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
6203
6204 dont use hostnames.
6205
6206 your uline should be for services.ircwayoxbay NOT localhost.
6207
6208 >Ok... Ok... This is becomming quite an issue :) Here
6209 >is what I have done to fix using your suggestions, and
6210 >here is the undesired results.
6211 >
6212 >I changed
6213 >link services.ircwayoxbay
6214 >{
6215 > username *;
6216 > hostname localhost;
6217 > bind-ip *;
6218 > port 7029;
6219 > leaf *;
6220 > password-connect "LiNK";
6221 > password-receive "LiNK";
6222 > class servers;
6223 > options {
6224 >/*
6225 > autoconnect;
6226 > ssl;
6227 > zip;
6228 >*/
6229 > };
6230 >};
6231 >
6232 >
6233 >and..
6234 >
6235 >
6236 >ulines {
6237 > localhost;
6238 >};
6239 >
6240 >(Notice the only changes were changing 127.0.0.1 to
6241 >localhost as the last suggestion was ulines needed a
6242 >hostname, not an IP)
6243 >
6244 >and Now the results are:
6245 >My nick is still not changed/and I am not killed
6246 >(unless a client such as epic changes itself) After
6247 >my nick isn't changed, I can change it to another
6248 >nick... and then try to change it back but the the
6249 >server says its inuse. After a quick /whois I get
6250 >*** temporal is enforcer@ircwayoxbay (NickServ
6251 >Enforcement)
6252 >*** on irc via server services.ircwayoxbay
6253 >(IRCWAY_OXBAY Services)
6254 >*** temporal : End of /WHOIS list.
6255 >I thought enforcer was only for when NickServ was in
6256 >use by a user when services restarted...... confusing?
6257 >yes.
6258 >
6259 >Truly yours - more and more confused daily,
6260 >Kynan.
6261 >
6262 >__________________________________
6263 >Do you Yahoo!?
6264 >Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
6265 >http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
6266 >
6267 >------------------------------------------------------------------
6268 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6269 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6270
6271
6272
6273 From thekynanbud at yahoo.com Tue Apr 6 08:49:13 2004
6274 From: thekynanbud at yahoo.com (kynan lalone)
6275 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:04 2004
6276 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
6277 Message-ID: <20040406154913.63782.qmail@web60205.mail.yahoo.com>
6278
6279 Thank you so much for helping me with my problem.
6280 Everything works perfectly now.. I just one last quick
6281 question for a newbie to ircservices...
6282
6283 Is there any way I can clear all the access lists (I
6284 think that is the problem) So all the users don't have
6285 to re-register to enable this new feature?
6286
6287 Thank you so much for the help and putting up with my
6288 incompetence :)
6289
6290 Kynan
6291
6292 __________________________________
6293 Do you Yahoo!?
6294 Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
6295 http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
6296
6297
6298 From chat at discoware.com Tue Apr 6 15:36:19 2004
6299 From: chat at discoware.com (TrAnCe)
6300 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6301 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug?
6302 Message-ID: <003001c41c27$abb27c80$1368fea9@discoware>
6303
6304 I found a little bug whith UnrealIRCd 3.2-RC2
6305 . . Now talking in #
6306 [Total: 1] [Ops: 1 (100%)] [Voice: 0 (0%)] [Regular: 0 (0%)]
6307 [Synched in 0.016 seconds]
6308 [ 00:32:14 ] . . ChanMode: @Frodo^Minas_Tirith sets mode [ +nt ]
6309
6310 I can join to # channel.
6311 Is it an ircservices bug or UnrealIRCd bug. I think it is services bug.
6312 -------------- next part --------------
6313 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
6314 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040407/3ea7ae17/attachment.htm
6315 From ircservices at tou.de Tue Apr 6 15:53:25 2004
6316 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
6317 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6318 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug?
6319 References: <003001c41c27$abb27c80$1368fea9@discoware>
6320 Message-ID: <0f0801c41c2a$4afdd5d0$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
6321
6322 ----- Original Message -----
6323 From: TrAnCe
6324 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
6325 Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:36 AM
6326 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug?
6327
6328
6329 > I can join to # channel.
6330 > Is it an ircservices bug or UnrealIRCd bug. I think it is services bug.
6331
6332 It's not a bug. Whether you can join the # channel depends on this option:
6333
6334 # CSForbidShortChannel [OPTIONAL]
6335 # When enabled, treats the channel "#" as a forbidden channel, not
6336 # allowing any users to join it. When not enabled, the channel "#"
6337 # can be used normally, although ChanServ functions cannot be used
6338 # with it.
6339
6340 Wolle
6341
6342
6343
6344 From medice at gmx.at Tue Apr 6 15:56:27 2004
6345 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
6346 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6347 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug?
6348 In-Reply-To: <003001c41c27$abb27c80$1368fea9@discoware>
6349 References: <003001c41c27$abb27c80$1368fea9@discoware>
6350 Message-ID: <4073359B.9000607@gmx.at>
6351
6352 TrAnCe wrote:
6353 > I found a little bug whith UnrealIRCd 3.2-RC2
6354 > ? ? Now talking in #
6355 > [Total: 1] [Ops: 1 (100%)] [Voice: 0 (0%)] [Regular: 0 (0%)]
6356 > [Synched in 0.016 seconds]
6357 > [ 00:32:14 ] ? ? ChanMode: @Frodo^Minas_Tirith sets mode [ +nt ]
6358 >
6359 > I can join to # channel.
6360 > Is it an ircservices bug or UnrealIRCd bug. I think it is services bug.
6361 >
6362 >
6363 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
6364 >
6365 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6366 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6367 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6368
6369 why do you think so? it's an ircd-bug, as it's the work of ircd joining
6370 users to channel or not, services are something more in background in a
6371 sense...
6372
6373 greets
6374 /medice
6375
6376
6377 From jamie at silverdream.org Tue Apr 6 16:05:23 2004
6378 From: jamie at silverdream.org (Jamie L. Penman-Smithson)
6379 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6380 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug?
6381 In-Reply-To: <003001c41c27$abb27c80$1368fea9@discoware>
6382 References: <003001c41c27$abb27c80$1368fea9@discoware>
6383 Message-ID: <1081292723.1115.209.camel@oasis.silverdream.hq>
6384
6385 On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 23:36, TrAnCe wrote:
6386 > I can join to # channel.
6387 > Is it an ircservices bug or UnrealIRCd bug. I think it is services
6388 > bug.
6389
6390 Next time, RTFM. If you'd looked at the documentation you'd have read
6391 these two rather enlightening paragraphs:
6392
6393 "Finally, note that the channel "#" (a single "#" character with no name
6394 following) is treated specially by Services. While this channel is legal
6395 according to the IRC protocol (RFC 1459) and in fact supported by most,
6396 if not all, IRC servers, it requires special treatment for use with a
6397 number of Services functions, and in fact bugs in previous versions of
6398 Services as well as other Services-like programs have allowed users to
6399 crash these programs using the channel "#". Thus, to avoid the potential
6400 for such problems, Services explicitly refuses to allow this channel to
6401 be registered (or forbidden), which in turn prevents any other Services
6402 functions from being used with it."
6403
6404 "As a result of this (lack of) handling, users will be able to use the
6405 channel "#" freely. If this bothers you, the CSForbidShortChannel option
6406 in modules.conf can be enabled, which causes Services to treat this
6407 channel as a forbidden channel and not allow any clients to use it.
6408 (Unlike normal forbidden channels, even Services administrators will not
6409 be permitted to use the channel when this option is enabled.)"
6410
6411 --
6412 -jamie <jamie@silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam@silverdream.org
6413 w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms@silverdream.org
6414 pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key
6415 23:30:01 up 2 days, 34 min, 12 users, load average: 0.06, 0.19, 0.18
6416 -------------- next part --------------
6417 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
6418 Name: not available
6419 Type: application/pgp-signature
6420 Size: 189 bytes
6421 Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
6422 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040407/d01e39d6/attachment.pgp
6423 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Apr 7 10:17:23 2004
6424 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6425 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6426 Subject: [IRCServices] nsforcenickchange
6427 In-Reply-To: <20040406154913.63782.qmail@web60205.mail.yahoo.com>
6428 Message-ID: <407356fe.01730@achurch.org>
6429
6430 >Is there any way I can clear all the access lists (I
6431 >think that is the problem) So all the users don't have
6432 >to re-register to enable this new feature?
6433
6434 Not all at once, unless you wipe the databases completely
6435 (rm {datadir}/*.db).
6436
6437 --Andrew Church
6438 achurch@achurch.org
6439 http://achurch.org/
6440
6441
6442 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Apr 9 14:18:30 2004
6443 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6444 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6445 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault again.
6446 In-Reply-To: <4024F218.7090900@se.linux.org>
6447 Message-ID: <407632aa.63255@achurch.org>
6448
6449 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6450 >Hash: SHA1
6451 >
6452 >Andrew Church wrote:
6453 >| I can't find any reference to a -fstack-protector option in the GCC
6454 >| documentation. Are you using an unofficial build? If so, your GCC could
6455 >| be broken. If you can send me your executable file and core, I'll try to
6456 >| look into the problem as time permits.
6457 >
6458 >I am not the one controling this part at our server, so I don't know so
6459 >much about it. As far as I know it's an extantion to gcc, see [0], and
6460 >are used to protect agains stack overflows. The other admins just said
6461 >that I should use -fstack-protector while compiling IRCd and services,
6462 >and so I did. I think this was why I got seg fraults using .27 before too.
6463 [...]
6464 >[0] http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/
6465
6466 I finally got around to looking at this, and it turns out that this
6467 stack-protector extension has a bug which generates incorrect code for
6468 certain cases, and Services triggers this bug. I've sent a report to the
6469 author of the patch; for the meantime, don't use -fstack-protector when
6470 compiling Services. (I'll put in a configure check in the next release to
6471 ensure that it's not used.)
6472
6473 --Andrew Church
6474 achurch@achurch.org
6475 http://achurch.org/
6476
6477
6478 From azoff at se.linux.org Fri Apr 9 01:38:50 2004
6479 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?VG9yYmpvInJuIFN2ZW5zc29u?=)
6480 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6481 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault again.
6482 In-Reply-To: <407632aa.63255@achurch.org>
6483 References: <407632aa.63255@achurch.org>
6484 Message-ID: <4076611A.2000403@se.linux.org>
6485
6486 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6487 Hash: SHA1
6488
6489 Andrew Church wrote:
6490 |
6491 | I finally got around to looking at this, and it turns out that this
6492 | stack-protector extension has a bug which generates incorrect code for
6493 | certain cases, and Services triggers this bug. I've sent a report to the
6494 | author of the patch; for the meantime, don't use -fstack-protector when
6495 | compiling Services. (I'll put in a configure check in the next release to
6496 | ensure that it's not used.)
6497
6498 Thanks!
6499 Please tell me when I could use -fstack-protector again :)
6500
6501 Regards,
6502 - --
6503 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
6504 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
6505 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
6506 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
6507
6508 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
6509 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
6510 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
6511
6512 iD8DBQFAdmEZeY7jmtvbDP0RAlc8AKCdCsueItnte8wgbGzs8CMF9SJwAQCggaMO
6513 kILla37ec+UR31qW6/X1uh4=
6514 =C1Uq
6515 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
6516
6517
6518 From ircservices at tou.de Mon Apr 12 07:42:21 2004
6519 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
6520 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6521 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6522 Message-ID: <16fa01c4209d$051a71f0$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
6523
6524 Hi,
6525
6526 at our net we have lot of users running unattended bouncers. Some of these
6527 bouncers have no auto identify on logon and start to 'fight' with the
6528 services after a reconnect. Means: They change to a registered nick,
6529 services change their nick to a guest nick and so on - i'm sure you all know
6530 this situation.
6531
6532 I see the following options to cope with this problem (manually, as sadmin):
6533 - ban the user in one of his channels to stop nick changes
6534 You need chanop-privileges in one of the users channels. If the bouncer
6535 reconnects, you have the same problem.
6536
6537 - kill/kline the user
6538 Very hard method with low effect. BNC continues annoying by (quickly)
6539 reconnecting servers.
6540
6541 - drop the nick
6542 There should be no reason to drop other users nick.. :)
6543
6544 - disable the kill-option for the nick
6545 Working solution, but opens a security hole: Other users can use the nick.
6546
6547 - add the ident/host mask to the nick accesslist
6548 IMHO the best solution. I'm not a fan of changing other users options, but
6549 compared to the alternatives it's the easiest and friendliest method.
6550
6551 The problem is, that you can only modify your own nick access list, even as
6552 sadmin. It would be very helpful if sadmins could modify the nick
6553 access lists of any user like they can change the nick options for everyone.
6554
6555 Wolle
6556
6557
6558
6559
6560 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Apr 12 09:01:28 2004
6561 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
6562 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6563 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6564 Message-ID: <mailman.30.1098597725.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6565
6566 Cant you use /ns set <nick> kill off? The user will be prompted for their password, but Nickserv wont take any action if its not entered.
6567
6568 /****************************************
6569 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
6570 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
6571 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
6572 ****************************************/
6573
6574
6575 /****************************************
6576 * From - Wolfgang Urban <ircservices@tou.de>
6577 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6578 * Sent - 2004-04-12 15:42:21
6579 * Subject - [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6580 ****************************************/
6581
6582 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
6583
6584 >Hi,
6585 >
6586 >at our net we have lot of users running unattended bouncers. Some of these
6587 >bouncers have no auto identify on logon and start to 'fight' with the
6588 >services after a reconnect. Means: They change to a registered nick,
6589 >services change their nick to a guest nick and so on - i'm sure you all know
6590 >this situation.
6591 >
6592 >I see the following options to cope with this problem (manually, as sadmin):
6593 >- ban the user in one of his channels to stop nick changes
6594 > You need chanop-privileges in one of the users channels. If the bouncer
6595 > reconnects, you have the same problem.
6596 >
6597 >- kill/kline the user
6598 > Very hard method with low effect. BNC continues annoying by (quickly)
6599 > reconnecting servers.
6600 >
6601 >- drop the nick
6602 > There should be no reason to drop other users nick.. :)
6603 >
6604 >- disable the kill-option for the nick
6605 > Working solution, but opens a security hole: Other users can use the nick.
6606 >
6607 >- add the ident/host mask to the nick accesslist
6608 > IMHO the best solution. I'm not a fan of changing other users options, but
6609 > compared to the alternatives it's the easiest and friendliest method.
6610 >
6611 >The problem is, that you can only modify your own nick access list, even as
6612 >sadmin. It would be very helpful if sadmins could modify the nick
6613 >access lists of any user like they can change the nick options for everyone.
6614 >
6615 >Wolle
6616 >
6617 >
6618 >
6619 >------------------------------------------------------------------
6620 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6621 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6622 >.
6623
6624 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
6625
6626
6627
6628
6629 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Apr 12 09:28:50 2004
6630 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
6631 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6632 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6633 Message-ID: <200404121628.i3CGSov08804@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
6634
6635 that lets other users use the nick too though :p
6636
6637 >Cant you use /ns set <nick> kill off? The user will be prompted for their password, but Nickserv wont take any action if its not entered.
6638 >
6639 >/****************************************
6640 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
6641 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
6642 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
6643 > ****************************************/
6644 >
6645 >
6646 >/****************************************
6647 > * From - Wolfgang Urban <ircservices@tou.de>
6648 > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6649 > * Sent - 2004-04-12 15:42:21
6650 > * Subject - [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6651 > ****************************************/
6652 >
6653 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
6654 >
6655 >>Hi,
6656 >>
6657 >>at our net we have lot of users running unattended bouncers. Some of these
6658 >>bouncers have no auto identify on logon and start to 'fight' with the
6659 >>services after a reconnect. Means: They change to a registered nick,
6660 >>services change their nick to a guest nick and so on - i'm sure you all know
6661 >>this situation.
6662 >>
6663 >>I see the following options to cope with this problem (manually, as sadmin):
6664 >>- ban the user in one of his channels to stop nick changes
6665 >> You need chanop-privileges in one of the users channels. If the bouncer
6666 >> reconnects, you have the same problem.
6667 >>
6668 >>- kill/kline the user
6669 >> Very hard method with low effect. BNC continues annoying by (quickly)
6670 >> reconnecting servers.
6671 >>
6672 >>- drop the nick
6673 >> There should be no reason to drop other users nick.. :)
6674 >>
6675 >>- disable the kill-option for the nick
6676 >> Working solution, but opens a security hole: Other users can use the nick.
6677 >>
6678 >>- add the ident/host mask to the nick accesslist
6679 >> IMHO the best solution. I'm not a fan of changing other users options, but
6680 >> compared to the alternatives it's the easiest and friendliest method.
6681 >>
6682 >>The problem is, that you can only modify your own nick access list, even as
6683 >>sadmin. It would be very helpful if sadmins could modify the nick
6684 >>access lists of any user like they can change the nick options for everyone.
6685 >>
6686 >>Wolle
6687 >>
6688 >>
6689 >>
6690 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
6691 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6692 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6693 >>.
6694 >
6695 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
6696 >
6697 >
6698 >
6699 >------------------------------------------------------------------
6700 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6701 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6702
6703
6704
6705 From ircservices at tou.de Mon Apr 12 09:45:48 2004
6706 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
6707 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6708 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6709 References: <200404121602.i3CG2kWN023970@mailin.webmailer.de>
6710 Message-ID: <174e01c420ad$ef26e070$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
6711
6712 ----- Original Message -----
6713 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@chatspike.net>
6714 To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6715 Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 6:01 PM
6716 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6717
6718
6719 > Cant you use /ns set <nick> kill off? The user will be prompted for
6720 > their password, but Nickserv wont take any action if its not entered.
6721
6722 As i wrote:
6723
6724 > >- disable the kill-option for the nick
6725 > > Working solution, but opens a security hole: Other users can use the
6726 > > nick.
6727
6728 Wolle
6729
6730
6731
6732 From ircservices at tou.de Mon Apr 12 09:56:15 2004
6733 From: ircservices at tou.de (Wolfgang Urban)
6734 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6735 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6736 References: <407AC3FE.9050509@sympatico.ca>
6737 Message-ID: <179a01c420af$6ecb7650$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
6738
6739 ----- Original Message -----
6740 From: "pam" <pam.goudge@sympatico.ca>
6741 To: "Wolfgang Urban" <ircservices@tou.de>
6742 Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 6:29 PM
6743 Subject: re [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6744
6745
6746 > if using unreal sajoin these guys in a channel that is +N
6747 > +N stops nick changes
6748
6749 I'm not using Unreal, but setting chanmode N would have the same effect as:
6750
6751 > > - ban the user in one of his channels to stop nick changes
6752 > > You need chanop-privileges in one of the users channels. If the
6753 > > bouncer reconnects, you have the same problem.
6754
6755 Additionally some bouncers part channels immediately after sajoin'ing them.
6756 And they won't autojoin this channel when they reconnect.
6757
6758 Wolle
6759
6760
6761
6762 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Apr 13 09:06:00 2004
6763 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6764 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6765 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request: SA can modify every NS acc list
6766 In-Reply-To: <16fa01c4209d$051a71f0$024ea8c0@wolfkiste>
6767 Message-ID: <407b2ef9.15272@achurch.org>
6768
6769 >The problem is, that you can only modify your own nick access list, even as
6770 >sadmin. It would be very helpful if sadmins could modify the nick
6771 >access lists of any user like they can change the nick options for everyone.
6772
6773 This is already in my plans for 5.1.
6774
6775 --Andrew Church
6776 achurch@achurch.org
6777 http://achurch.org/
6778
6779
6780 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue Apr 13 05:13:46 2004
6781 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
6782 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6783 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6784 Message-ID: <20040413121346.62294.qmail@web86105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
6785
6786 Hello.
6787 A new command may be added to ircservices (or not..).
6788 The command will be like this:
6789
6790 /cs set #channel restrictid on-off
6791
6792 If the option is "on" the /cs identify command will be
6793 allowed only to channel accessed users even if someone
6794 else have the password. If the option is "off" the /cs
6795 identify command will be allowed to anyone who have
6796 the password.
6797
6798 Please reply:))
6799
6800
6801 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue Apr 13 10:48:08 2004
6802 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
6803 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6804 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6805 Message-ID: <20040413174808.38288.qmail@web86106.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
6806
6807 Sorry for my english.. A channel accessed user is a
6808 user who have access to a channel.
6809
6810 =====
6811 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
6812
6813
6814
6815 From brain at winbot.co.uk Tue Apr 13 12:26:52 2004
6816 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
6817 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6818 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6819 Message-ID: <200404131926.i3DJQqv02204@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
6820
6821 i really like this idea, hope it gets put into 5.1 or whenever...
6822
6823 >Hello.
6824 >A new command may be added to ircservices (or not..).
6825 >The command will be like this:
6826 >
6827 >/cs set #channel restrictid on-off
6828 >
6829 >If the option is "on" the /cs identify command will be
6830 >allowed only to channel accessed users even if someone
6831 >else have the password. If the option is "off" the /cs
6832 >identify command will be allowed to anyone who have
6833 >the password.
6834 >
6835 >Please reply:))
6836 >
6837 >------------------------------------------------------------------
6838 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6839 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6840
6841
6842
6843 From mark at ctcp.net Tue Apr 13 13:59:58 2004
6844 From: mark at ctcp.net (M)
6845 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6846 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6847 In-Reply-To: <20040413121346.62294.qmail@web86105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
6848 Message-ID: <E1BDV12-0007Y1-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
6849
6850 Isn't this already available: by default only the founder knows the password
6851 so only that person can identify for it. If for some peculiar reason the
6852 founder wants to share the password they can.
6853
6854 This "option" does not seem to create a benefit and merely adds unnecessary
6855 complexity.
6856
6857 M.
6858
6859 > -----Original Message-----
6860 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
6861 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
6862 > Dionisios K.
6863 > Sent: 13 April 2004 13:14
6864 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
6865 > Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6866 >
6867 > Hello.
6868 > A new command may be added to ircservices (or not..).
6869 > The command will be like this:
6870 >
6871 > /cs set #channel restrictid on-off
6872 >
6873 > If the option is "on" the /cs identify command will be
6874 > allowed only to channel accessed users even if someone else
6875 > have the password. If the option is "off" the /cs identify
6876 > command will be allowed to anyone who have the password.
6877 >
6878 > Please reply:))
6879 >
6880 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6881 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6882 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6883 >
6884
6885
6886
6887 From Craig at chatspike.net Tue Apr 13 15:50:12 2004
6888 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
6889 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6890 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6891 Message-ID: <mailman.31.1098597725.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6892
6893 This command would add things to make the channel more secure thou, If you did give the channel founder password to people you trust, and you find its being abused, you can simply remove that person from the access list, this way you dont need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing it :)
6894
6895 /****************************************
6896 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
6897 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
6898 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
6899 ****************************************/
6900
6901
6902 /****************************************
6903 * From - M <mark@ctcp.net>
6904 * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List' <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6905 * Sent - 2004-04-13 21:59:58
6906 * Subject - RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6907 ****************************************/
6908
6909 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
6910
6911 >Isn't this already available: by default only the founder knows the password
6912 >so only that person can identify for it. If for some peculiar reason the
6913 >founder wants to share the password they can.
6914 >
6915 >This "option" does not seem to create a benefit and merely adds unnecessary
6916 >complexity.
6917 >
6918 >M.
6919 >
6920 >
6921 >------------------------------------------------------------------
6922 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6923 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6924 >.
6925
6926 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
6927
6928
6929
6930
6931 From mark at ctcp.net Tue Apr 13 16:08:45 2004
6932 From: mark at ctcp.net (M)
6933 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6934 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6935 In-Reply-To: <E1BDWk5-0004J3-HD@lon1-hub.mail.demon.net>
6936 Message-ID: <E1BDX1f-0001VX-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
6937
6938 Craig McLure wrote:
6939 > This command would add things to make the channel more secure
6940 > thou, If you did give the channel founder password to people
6941 > you trust, and you find its being abused, you can simply
6942 > remove that person from the access list, this way you dont
6943 > need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing it :)
6944
6945 The way to be secure is not to give out the founder password. You could
6946 apply the same short sighted reason for a "/ns set
6947 letotherpeopleaccessmynick pass" request.
6948
6949 The founder password is designed to give the channel founder access to
6950 manage the ownership of the channel. There is no need to give out the
6951 password to anyone, channel management through others is provided via op
6952 status.
6953
6954 If for some peculiar reason a channel founder wishes to share the password
6955 then IMO that is their problem. The chances are that any user that would
6956 require modifying the access list to "fix" this, would likely be attempted
6957 too late since a rogue user could have merely taken ownership of the channel
6958 thereby making the option and the founder password redundant and merely make
6959 it a problem that administrators waste time on.
6960
6961 The founder can already provide access to whatever commands an op needs via
6962 levels which is far more secure and already subject to access list
6963 restrictions.
6964
6965 What function of founder status is required that warrants removing the
6966 founder status by supporting sharing of it?
6967
6968 M.
6969
6970
6971
6972 From Craig at chatspike.net Tue Apr 13 17:39:43 2004
6973 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
6974 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
6975 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6976 Message-ID: <mailman.32.1098597725.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6977
6978 I read this mail, and read it again, and its absolutly right, with some careful manipulation of the /cs levels command, along with /cs access, you can basically give people 'Founder' privs without them being founder. Another possible advantage to this command thou.. If for some weird reason, someone finds your channel password, this command would prevent them from doing anything with it, as they would not be able to log on as channel founder (Unless they were on the access list). sometimes the distributation of channel passwords may be present when the real founder cant get at the channel for various reasons, and they give the password to the successor, or someone else trustworthy. From where i'm sitting, I cant really see any other real use for this function.
6979
6980 /****************************************
6981 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
6982 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
6983 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
6984 ****************************************/
6985
6986
6987 /****************************************
6988 * From - M <mark@ctcp.net>
6989 * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List' <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
6990 * Sent - 2004-04-13 23:08:45
6991 * Subject - RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
6992 ****************************************/
6993
6994 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
6995
6996 >Craig McLure wrote:
6997 >> This command would add things to make the channel more secure
6998 >> thou, If you did give the channel founder password to people
6999 >> you trust, and you find its being abused, you can simply
7000 >> remove that person from the access list, this way you dont
7001 >> need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing it :)
7002 >
7003 >The way to be secure is not to give out the founder password. You could
7004 >apply the same short sighted reason for a "/ns set
7005 >letotherpeopleaccessmynick pass" request.
7006 >
7007 >The founder password is designed to give the channel founder access to
7008 >manage the ownership of the channel. There is no need to give out the
7009 >password to anyone, channel management through others is provided via op
7010 >status.
7011 >
7012 >If for some peculiar reason a channel founder wishes to share the password
7013 >then IMO that is their problem. The chances are that any user that would
7014 >require modifying the access list to "fix" this, would likely be attempted
7015 >too late since a rogue user could have merely taken ownership of the channel
7016 >thereby making the option and the founder password redundant and merely make
7017 >it a problem that administrators waste time on.
7018 >
7019 >The founder can already provide access to whatever commands an op needs via
7020 >levels which is far more secure and already subject to access list
7021 >restrictions.
7022 >
7023 >What function of founder status is required that warrants removing the
7024 >founder status by supporting sharing of it?
7025 >
7026 >M.
7027 >
7028 >
7029 >------------------------------------------------------------------
7030 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7031 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7032 >.
7033
7034 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
7035
7036
7037
7038
7039 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Apr 14 09:42:30 2004
7040 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
7041 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7042 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7043 In-Reply-To: <407c7a68.52474@mail.achurch.org>
7044 Message-ID: <407c8f26.04340@achurch.org>
7045
7046 >Another possible advantage to this command thou.. If for some weird
7047 >reason, someone finds your channel password, this command would prevent
7048 >them from doing anything with it, as they would not be able to log on as
7049 >channel founder (Unless they were on the access list).
7050
7051 It's always been my policy not to try and defend against user
7052 stupidity; "build idiot-proof software, and Nature will build a better
7053 idiot"--it's a losing battle. I realize that with the glut of online
7054 services these days, it's next to impossible to memorize "good", distinct
7055 passwords for everything, and I'll admit even I keep my less important
7056 passwords stored in an encrypted file on my PC. Nonetheless, the password
7057 itself should almost never be needed, since the founder can perform all
7058 founder functions (except dropping) by identifying for their nick. If the
7059 founder does choose to share the password, e.g. while going on vacation,
7060 and said password is abused, as far as I'm concerned that's their fault,
7061 and there's nothing Services should do about it.
7062
7063 --Andrew Church
7064 achurch@achurch.org
7065 http://achurch.org/
7066
7067
7068 From dwachtve at hotmail.com Tue Apr 13 18:12:19 2004
7069 From: dwachtve at hotmail.com (David D. Wachtveitl)
7070 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7071 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7072 References: <MC5-F18cCESWs38TRwy00048f7f@mc5-f18.hotmail.com>
7073 Message-ID: <Sea2-DAV11p0mmhQZiC0002835a@hotmail.com>
7074
7075 Also, it would prevent an "over the shoulder" viewer of the password the
7076 ability to use it. I keep an access mask on my nick ident for this very
7077 reason. I think it makes some sense to have this on the channel founder as
7078 well (as an option). Of course, if for some reason you are the founder and
7079 no longer have access to the mask you set for yourself, you could be sol
7080 also :P
7081
7082
7083 ----- Original Message -----
7084 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@chatspike.net>
7085 To: "mark@ctcp.net, IRC Services Gene"
7086 <mark@ctcp.net,ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7087 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:39 PM
7088 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7089
7090
7091 > I read this mail, and read it again, and its absolutly right, with some
7092 careful manipulation of the /cs levels command, along with /cs access, you
7093 can basically give people 'Founder' privs without them being founder.
7094 Another possible advantage to this command thou.. If for some weird reason,
7095 someone finds your channel password, this command would prevent them from
7096 doing anything with it, as they would not be able to log on as channel
7097 founder (Unless they were on the access list). sometimes the distributation
7098 of channel passwords may be present when the real founder cant get at the
7099 channel for various reasons, and they give the password to the successor, or
7100 someone else trustworthy. From where i'm sitting, I cant really see any
7101 other real use for this function.
7102 >
7103 > /****************************************
7104 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
7105 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
7106 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
7107 > ****************************************/
7108 >
7109 >
7110 > /****************************************
7111 > * From - M <mark@ctcp.net>
7112 > * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
7113 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7114 > * Sent - 2004-04-13 23:08:45
7115 > * Subject - RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7116 > ****************************************/
7117 >
7118 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
7119 >
7120 > >Craig McLure wrote:
7121 > >> This command would add things to make the channel more secure
7122 > >> thou, If you did give the channel founder password to people
7123 > >> you trust, and you find its being abused, you can simply
7124 > >> remove that person from the access list, this way you dont
7125 > >> need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing it :)
7126 > >
7127 > >The way to be secure is not to give out the founder password. You could
7128 > >apply the same short sighted reason for a "/ns set
7129 > >letotherpeopleaccessmynick pass" request.
7130 > >
7131 > >The founder password is designed to give the channel founder access to
7132 > >manage the ownership of the channel. There is no need to give out the
7133 > >password to anyone, channel management through others is provided via op
7134 > >status.
7135 > >
7136 > >If for some peculiar reason a channel founder wishes to share the
7137 password
7138 > >then IMO that is their problem. The chances are that any user that would
7139 > >require modifying the access list to "fix" this, would likely be
7140 attempted
7141 > >too late since a rogue user could have merely taken ownership of the
7142 channel
7143 > >thereby making the option and the founder password redundant and merely
7144 make
7145 > >it a problem that administrators waste time on.
7146 > >
7147 > >The founder can already provide access to whatever commands an op needs
7148 via
7149 > >levels which is far more secure and already subject to access list
7150 > >restrictions.
7151 > >
7152 > >What function of founder status is required that warrants removing the
7153 > >founder status by supporting sharing of it?
7154 > >
7155 > >M.
7156 > >
7157 > >
7158 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
7159 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7160 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7161 > >.
7162 >
7163 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
7164 >
7165 >
7166 >
7167 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7168 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7169 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7170 >
7171
7172
7173 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Apr 14 10:42:57 2004
7174 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
7175 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7176 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7177 In-Reply-To: <Sea2-DAV11p0mmhQZiC0002835a@hotmail.com>
7178 Message-ID: <407c9775.04373@achurch.org>
7179
7180 >Also, it would prevent an "over the shoulder" viewer of the password the
7181 >ability to use it. I keep an access mask on my nick ident for this very
7182 >reason. I think it makes some sense to have this on the channel founder as
7183 >well (as an option). Of course, if for some reason you are the founder and
7184 >no longer have access to the mask you set for yourself, you could be sol
7185 >also :P
7186
7187 The same issue applies for nicks, since you can identify regardless of
7188 whether you match an access mask or not--unless you set KILL IMMED on your
7189 nick, in which case, as you say, you're SOL. The solution is to not let
7190 people watch you type your password.
7191
7192 --Andrew Church
7193 achurch@achurch.org
7194 http://achurch.org/
7195
7196
7197 From dwachtve at hotmail.com Tue Apr 13 18:59:09 2004
7198 From: dwachtve at hotmail.com (David D. Wachtveitl)
7199 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7200 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7201 References: <407c9775.04373@achurch.org>
7202 Message-ID: <SEA2-DAV6wZKxnEzY0W00010f3c@hotmail.com>
7203
7204 Well, except on nicks you have the option, on the channel founder you do
7205 not, is that not the whole point trying to be made here? In this day and
7206 age, it is getting to the point where you can barely go to the bathroom
7207 without being "watched" in some manner. The real answer would be to crypt
7208 the passwords (so they can't be snooped/sniffed) and to not allow them to be
7209 seen on the screen. Knowing that is not going to happen, the current
7210 suggestion would be a good solution.
7211
7212 Just my .02
7213
7214 ----- Original Message -----
7215 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
7216 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7217 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:42 PM
7218 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7219
7220
7221 > >Also, it would prevent an "over the shoulder" viewer of the password the
7222 > >ability to use it. I keep an access mask on my nick ident for this very
7223 > >reason. I think it makes some sense to have this on the channel founder
7224 as
7225 > >well (as an option). Of course, if for some reason you are the founder
7226 and
7227 > >no longer have access to the mask you set for yourself, you could be sol
7228 > >also :P
7229 >
7230 > The same issue applies for nicks, since you can identify regardless
7231 of
7232 > whether you match an access mask or not--unless you set KILL IMMED on your
7233 > nick, in which case, as you say, you're SOL. The solution is to not let
7234 > people watch you type your password.
7235 >
7236 > --Andrew Church
7237 > achurch@achurch.org
7238 > http://achurch.org/
7239 >
7240 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7241 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7242 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7243 >
7244
7245
7246 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Apr 14 11:38:08 2004
7247 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
7248 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7249 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.30 released
7250 Message-ID: <407ca4f2.24232@achurch.org>
7251
7252 Services 5.0.30 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
7253
7254 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (USA, California)
7255
7256 15d8c01946ea6bdcc173b561c6576cb0 ircservices-5.0.30.tar.gz
7257 350b43673ffc65ab4977898f5c4b861f ircservices-5.0.30.diff.gz
7258 b7663327556ae06b617f35c3cdf64338 ircservices-5.0.30-1.i386.rpm
7259 8bdbaa265fd38cd70d836392b8614708 ircservices_5.0.30-1_i386.deb
7260
7261 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
7262
7263 This is a maintenance release including fixes for the various issues
7264 that have been raised over the last couple of weeks. See below for
7265 details.
7266
7267 Changes in version 5.0.30
7268 -------------------------
7269 2004/04/09 Added logic to configure script to avoid the use of the
7270 -fstack-protector option if doing so would trigger a
7271 compiler bug. Reported by Torbjo"rn Svennson
7272 <azoff@se.linux.org>
7273 2004/04/06 ChanServ no longer requires an explicit IDENTIFY to use INFO
7274 ALL. Reported by Wolfgang Urban <ircservices@tou.de>
7275 2004/04/06 NickServ LISTCHANS now properly aborts when a non-servadmin
7276 uses the nickname form of the command. Reported by
7277 Elijah <admin@nevernet.net>
7278 2004/04/04 The ChanServ DEPROTECT command now clears channel-owner
7279 status on those IRC servers that support such a mode.
7280 Suggested by <freakycomputer@global.co.za>
7281 2004/04/02 Fixed additional bug causing autokill exclusions to not
7282 function properly in some cases.
7283 2004/04/02 Fixed bug causing autokill exclusions to not function under
7284 Unreal. Reported by Eric Murphy <emurphy@sporked.us>
7285 2004/03/31 Fixed bug allowing users to improperly be identified for
7286 newly-registered nicknames awaiting authentication.
7287 Reported by <cyberdems@cyberdems.za.net>
7288 2004/03/30 Added workaround for Unreal SQLINE "bouncing" issue.
7289 Reported by Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
7290 2004/03/30 ChanServ SET RESTRICTED no longer modifies the internal
7291 NOJOIN level.
7292 2004/03/30 Fixed failure to reset internal-use AUTODEOP and NOJOIN
7293 channel levels when loading databases from version 4.5
7294 and earlier. Reported by Wolfgang Urban
7295 <ircservices-coding@tou.de>
7296
7297
7298 --Andrew Church
7299 achurch@achurch.org
7300 http://achurch.org/
7301
7302
7303 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Apr 14 00:02:05 2004
7304 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
7305 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7306 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7307 Message-ID: <20040414070205.84542.qmail@web86105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
7308
7309 Im not sure but when someone try to identify a channet
7310 too many times with wrong password, chanserv suspends
7311 this channel for some days. This command will prevent
7312 any lame user who try to do this. And something else.
7313 If the real founder want to activate this command to
7314 his channel he must think the possibility to lose his
7315 nick password. But this command is optional if someone
7316 wants this type of security will enable it, if someone
7317 doesnt like this will not enable it.... Is this right
7318 or not?
7319
7320 =====
7321 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
7322
7323
7324
7325 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Apr 14 00:02:44 2004
7326 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
7327 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7328 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7329 Message-ID: <20040414070244.67109.qmail@web86110.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
7330
7331 Im not sure but when someone try to identify a channet
7332 too many times with wrong password, chanserv suspends
7333 this channel for some days. This command will prevent
7334 any lame user who try to do this. And something else.
7335 If the real founder want to activate this command to
7336 his channel he must think the possibility to lose his
7337 nick password. But this command is optional if someone
7338 wants this type of security will enable it, if someone
7339 doesnt like this will not enable it.... Is this right
7340 or not?
7341
7342 =====
7343 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
7344
7345
7346
7347 From ruldaen at wfsg.net Wed Apr 14 01:34:05 2004
7348 From: ruldaen at wfsg.net (crs97)
7349 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7350 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: IRCServices Digest, Vol 16, Issue 6
7351 In-Reply-To: <BLAZEeltyZZBClQhyCW000002d1@BLAZE.wfsg.net>
7352 Message-ID: <BLAZEnIkI2FQAYZILUd00000305@BLAZE.wfsg.net>
7353
7354 I really like this idea as well!!
7355
7356 -----Original Message-----
7357 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
7358 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
7359 ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
7360 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:03 PM
7361 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
7362 Subject: IRCServices Digest, Vol 16, Issue 6
7363
7364 Send IRCServices mailing list submissions to
7365 ircservices@ircservices.za.net
7366
7367 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
7368 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7369 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
7370 ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
7371
7372 You can reach the person managing the list at
7373 ircservices-owner@ircservices.za.net
7374
7375 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
7376 than "Re: Contents of IRCServices digest..."
7377
7378
7379 Today's Topics:
7380
7381 1. secure Identify Feature.. ( Dionisios K. )
7382 2. RE: secure Identify Feature.. (Dionisios K.)
7383 3. Re: secure Identify Feature.. (Craig Edwards)
7384 4. RE: secure Identify Feature.. (M)
7385 5. Re: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature.. (Craig McLure)
7386 6. RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature.. (M)
7387 7. Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature.. (Craig McLure)
7388 8. Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7389 (Andrew Church)
7390 9. Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7391 (David D. Wachtveitl)
7392 10. Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7393 (Andrew Church)
7394 11. Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7395 (David D. Wachtveitl)
7396
7397
7398 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
7399
7400 Message: 1
7401 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:13:46 +0100 (BST)
7402 From: " Dionisios K. " <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
7403 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7404 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
7405 Message-ID: <20040413121346.62294.qmail@web86105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
7406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7
7407
7408 Hello.
7409 A new command may be added to ircservices (or not..).
7410 The command will be like this:
7411
7412 /cs set #channel restrictid on-off
7413
7414 If the option is "on" the /cs identify command will be
7415 allowed only to channel accessed users even if someone
7416 else have the password. If the option is "off" the /cs
7417 identify command will be allowed to anyone who have
7418 the password.
7419
7420 Please reply:))
7421
7422
7423
7424 ------------------------------
7425
7426 Message: 2
7427 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
7428 From: "Dionisios K." <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
7429 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7430 To: Ircservices@ircservices.za.net
7431 Message-ID: <20040413174808.38288.qmail@web86106.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
7432 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
7433
7434 Sorry for my english.. A channel accessed user is a
7435 user who have access to a channel.
7436
7437 =====
7438 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
7439
7440
7441
7442
7443 ------------------------------
7444
7445 Message: 3
7446 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:26:52 +0100
7447 From: "Craig Edwards" <brain@winbot.co.uk>
7448 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7449 To: "ircservices" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7450 Message-ID: <200404131926.i3DJQqv02204@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
7451 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
7452
7453 i really like this idea, hope it gets put into 5.1 or whenever...
7454
7455 >Hello.
7456 >A new command may be added to ircservices (or not..).
7457 >The command will be like this:
7458 >
7459 >/cs set #channel restrictid on-off
7460 >
7461 >If the option is "on" the /cs identify command will be
7462 >allowed only to channel accessed users even if someone
7463 >else have the password. If the option is "off" the /cs
7464 >identify command will be allowed to anyone who have
7465 >the password.
7466 >
7467 >Please reply:))
7468 >
7469 >------------------------------------------------------------------
7470 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7471 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7472
7473
7474
7475
7476 ------------------------------
7477
7478 Message: 4
7479 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:59:58 +0100
7480 From: "M" <mark@ctcp.net>
7481 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7482 To: "'IRC Services General Mailing List'"
7483 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7484 Message-ID: <E1BDV12-0007Y1-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
7485 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
7486
7487 Isn't this already available: by default only the founder knows the password
7488 so only that person can identify for it. If for some peculiar reason the
7489 founder wants to share the password they can.
7490
7491 This "option" does not seem to create a benefit and merely adds unnecessary
7492 complexity.
7493
7494 M.
7495
7496 > -----Original Message-----
7497 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
7498 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
7499 > Dionisios K.
7500 > Sent: 13 April 2004 13:14
7501 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
7502 > Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7503 >
7504 > Hello.
7505 > A new command may be added to ircservices (or not..).
7506 > The command will be like this:
7507 >
7508 > /cs set #channel restrictid on-off
7509 >
7510 > If the option is "on" the /cs identify command will be
7511 > allowed only to channel accessed users even if someone else
7512 > have the password. If the option is "off" the /cs identify
7513 > command will be allowed to anyone who have the password.
7514 >
7515 > Please reply:))
7516 >
7517 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7518 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7519 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7520 >
7521
7522
7523
7524
7525 ------------------------------
7526
7527 Message: 5
7528 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:50:12 +0100
7529 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@chatspike.net>
7530 Subject: Re: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7531 To: "mark@ctcp.net, IRC Services Gene" <mark@ctcp.net,
7532 ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7533 Message-ID: <mailman.61.1081907989.777.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7534 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
7535
7536 This command would add things to make the channel more secure thou, If you
7537 did give the channel founder password to people you trust, and you find its
7538 being abused, you can simply remove that person from the access list, this
7539 way you dont need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing
7540 it :)
7541
7542 /****************************************
7543 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
7544 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
7545 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
7546 ****************************************/
7547
7548
7549 /****************************************
7550 * From - M <mark@ctcp.net>
7551 * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
7552 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7553 * Sent - 2004-04-13 21:59:58
7554 * Subject - RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7555 ****************************************/
7556
7557 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
7558
7559 >Isn't this already available: by default only the founder knows the
7560 password
7561 >so only that person can identify for it. If for some peculiar reason the
7562 >founder wants to share the password they can.
7563 >
7564 >This "option" does not seem to create a benefit and merely adds unnecessary
7565 >complexity.
7566 >
7567 >M.
7568 >
7569 >
7570 >------------------------------------------------------------------
7571 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7572 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7573 >.
7574
7575 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
7576
7577
7578
7579
7580
7581 ------------------------------
7582
7583 Message: 6
7584 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:08:45 +0100
7585 From: "M" <mark@ctcp.net>
7586 Subject: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7587 To: "'IRC Services General Mailing List'"
7588 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7589 Message-ID: <E1BDX1f-0001VX-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
7590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
7591
7592 Craig McLure wrote:
7593 > This command would add things to make the channel more secure
7594 > thou, If you did give the channel founder password to people
7595 > you trust, and you find its being abused, you can simply
7596 > remove that person from the access list, this way you dont
7597 > need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing it :)
7598
7599 The way to be secure is not to give out the founder password. You could
7600 apply the same short sighted reason for a "/ns set
7601 letotherpeopleaccessmynick pass" request.
7602
7603 The founder password is designed to give the channel founder access to
7604 manage the ownership of the channel. There is no need to give out the
7605 password to anyone, channel management through others is provided via op
7606 status.
7607
7608 If for some peculiar reason a channel founder wishes to share the password
7609 then IMO that is their problem. The chances are that any user that would
7610 require modifying the access list to "fix" this, would likely be attempted
7611 too late since a rogue user could have merely taken ownership of the channel
7612 thereby making the option and the founder password redundant and merely make
7613 it a problem that administrators waste time on.
7614
7615 The founder can already provide access to whatever commands an op needs via
7616 levels which is far more secure and already subject to access list
7617 restrictions.
7618
7619 What function of founder status is required that warrants removing the
7620 founder status by supporting sharing of it?
7621
7622 M.
7623
7624
7625
7626
7627 ------------------------------
7628
7629 Message: 7
7630 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:39:43 +0000
7631 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@chatspike.net>
7632 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7633 To: "mark@ctcp.net, IRC Services Gene" <mark@ctcp.net,
7634 ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7635 Message-ID: <mailman.62.1081907989.777.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
7637
7638 I read this mail, and read it again, and its absolutly right, with some
7639 careful manipulation of the /cs levels command, along with /cs access, you
7640 can basically give people 'Founder' privs without them being founder.
7641 Another possible advantage to this command thou.. If for some weird reason,
7642 someone finds your channel password, this command would prevent them from
7643 doing anything with it, as they would not be able to log on as channel
7644 founder (Unless they were on the access list). sometimes the distributation
7645 of channel passwords may be present when the real founder cant get at the
7646 channel for various reasons, and they give the password to the successor, or
7647 someone else trustworthy. From where i'm sitting, I cant really see any
7648 other real use for this function.
7649
7650 /****************************************
7651 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
7652 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
7653 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
7654 ****************************************/
7655
7656
7657 /****************************************
7658 * From - M <mark@ctcp.net>
7659 * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
7660 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7661 * Sent - 2004-04-13 23:08:45
7662 * Subject - RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7663 ****************************************/
7664
7665 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
7666
7667 >Craig McLure wrote:
7668 >> This command would add things to make the channel more secure
7669 >> thou, If you did give the channel founder password to people
7670 >> you trust, and you find its being abused, you can simply
7671 >> remove that person from the access list, this way you dont
7672 >> need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing it :)
7673 >
7674 >The way to be secure is not to give out the founder password. You could
7675 >apply the same short sighted reason for a "/ns set
7676 >letotherpeopleaccessmynick pass" request.
7677 >
7678 >The founder password is designed to give the channel founder access to
7679 >manage the ownership of the channel. There is no need to give out the
7680 >password to anyone, channel management through others is provided via op
7681 >status.
7682 >
7683 >If for some peculiar reason a channel founder wishes to share the password
7684 >then IMO that is their problem. The chances are that any user that would
7685 >require modifying the access list to "fix" this, would likely be attempted
7686 >too late since a rogue user could have merely taken ownership of the
7687 channel
7688 >thereby making the option and the founder password redundant and merely
7689 make
7690 >it a problem that administrators waste time on.
7691 >
7692 >The founder can already provide access to whatever commands an op needs via
7693 >levels which is far more secure and already subject to access list
7694 >restrictions.
7695 >
7696 >What function of founder status is required that warrants removing the
7697 >founder status by supporting sharing of it?
7698 >
7699 >M.
7700 >
7701 >
7702 >------------------------------------------------------------------
7703 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7704 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7705 >.
7706
7707 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
7708
7709
7710
7711
7712
7713 ------------------------------
7714
7715 Message: 8
7716 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:42:30 JST
7717 From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
7718 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7719 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
7720 Message-ID: <407c8f26.04340@achurch.org>
7721 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
7722
7723 >Another possible advantage to this command thou.. If for some weird
7724 >reason, someone finds your channel password, this command would prevent
7725 >them from doing anything with it, as they would not be able to log on as
7726 >channel founder (Unless they were on the access list).
7727
7728 It's always been my policy not to try and defend against user
7729 stupidity; "build idiot-proof software, and Nature will build a better
7730 idiot"--it's a losing battle. I realize that with the glut of online
7731 services these days, it's next to impossible to memorize "good", distinct
7732 passwords for everything, and I'll admit even I keep my less important
7733 passwords stored in an encrypted file on my PC. Nonetheless, the password
7734 itself should almost never be needed, since the founder can perform all
7735 founder functions (except dropping) by identifying for their nick. If the
7736 founder does choose to share the password, e.g. while going on vacation,
7737 and said password is abused, as far as I'm concerned that's their fault,
7738 and there's nothing Services should do about it.
7739
7740 --Andrew Church
7741 achurch@achurch.org
7742 http://achurch.org/
7743
7744
7745
7746 ------------------------------
7747
7748 Message: 9
7749 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:12:19 -0400
7750 From: "David D. Wachtveitl" <dwachtve@hotmail.com>
7751 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7752 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
7753 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>, "mark@ctcp.net, IRC Services
7754 Gene"
7755 <mark@ctcp.net, ircservices@ircservices.za.net>,
7756 <Craig@chatspike.net>
7757 Message-ID: <Sea2-DAV11p0mmhQZiC0002835a@hotmail.com>
7758 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
7759
7760 Also, it would prevent an "over the shoulder" viewer of the password the
7761 ability to use it. I keep an access mask on my nick ident for this very
7762 reason. I think it makes some sense to have this on the channel founder as
7763 well (as an option). Of course, if for some reason you are the founder and
7764 no longer have access to the mask you set for yourself, you could be sol
7765 also :P
7766
7767
7768 ----- Original Message -----
7769 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@chatspike.net>
7770 To: "mark@ctcp.net, IRC Services Gene"
7771 <mark@ctcp.net,ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7772 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:39 PM
7773 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7774
7775
7776 > I read this mail, and read it again, and its absolutly right, with some
7777 careful manipulation of the /cs levels command, along with /cs access, you
7778 can basically give people 'Founder' privs without them being founder.
7779 Another possible advantage to this command thou.. If for some weird reason,
7780 someone finds your channel password, this command would prevent them from
7781 doing anything with it, as they would not be able to log on as channel
7782 founder (Unless they were on the access list). sometimes the distributation
7783 of channel passwords may be present when the real founder cant get at the
7784 channel for various reasons, and they give the password to the successor, or
7785 someone else trustworthy. From where i'm sitting, I cant really see any
7786 other real use for this function.
7787 >
7788 > /****************************************
7789 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
7790 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
7791 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
7792 > ****************************************/
7793 >
7794 >
7795 > /****************************************
7796 > * From - M <mark@ctcp.net>
7797 > * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
7798 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7799 > * Sent - 2004-04-13 23:08:45
7800 > * Subject - RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7801 > ****************************************/
7802 >
7803 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
7804 >
7805 > >Craig McLure wrote:
7806 > >> This command would add things to make the channel more secure
7807 > >> thou, If you did give the channel founder password to people
7808 > >> you trust, and you find its being abused, you can simply
7809 > >> remove that person from the access list, this way you dont
7810 > >> need to worry about changing the password and re-distributing it :)
7811 > >
7812 > >The way to be secure is not to give out the founder password. You could
7813 > >apply the same short sighted reason for a "/ns set
7814 > >letotherpeopleaccessmynick pass" request.
7815 > >
7816 > >The founder password is designed to give the channel founder access to
7817 > >manage the ownership of the channel. There is no need to give out the
7818 > >password to anyone, channel management through others is provided via op
7819 > >status.
7820 > >
7821 > >If for some peculiar reason a channel founder wishes to share the
7822 password
7823 > >then IMO that is their problem. The chances are that any user that would
7824 > >require modifying the access list to "fix" this, would likely be
7825 attempted
7826 > >too late since a rogue user could have merely taken ownership of the
7827 channel
7828 > >thereby making the option and the founder password redundant and merely
7829 make
7830 > >it a problem that administrators waste time on.
7831 > >
7832 > >The founder can already provide access to whatever commands an op needs
7833 via
7834 > >levels which is far more secure and already subject to access list
7835 > >restrictions.
7836 > >
7837 > >What function of founder status is required that warrants removing the
7838 > >founder status by supporting sharing of it?
7839 > >
7840 > >M.
7841 > >
7842 > >
7843 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
7844 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7845 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7846 > >.
7847 >
7848 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
7849 >
7850 >
7851 >
7852 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7853 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7854 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7855 >
7856
7857
7858
7859 ------------------------------
7860
7861 Message: 10
7862 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:42:57 JST
7863 From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
7864 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7865 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
7866 Message-ID: <407c9775.04373@achurch.org>
7867 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
7868
7869 >Also, it would prevent an "over the shoulder" viewer of the password the
7870 >ability to use it. I keep an access mask on my nick ident for this very
7871 >reason. I think it makes some sense to have this on the channel founder as
7872 >well (as an option). Of course, if for some reason you are the founder and
7873 >no longer have access to the mask you set for yourself, you could be sol
7874 >also :P
7875
7876 The same issue applies for nicks, since you can identify regardless of
7877 whether you match an access mask or not--unless you set KILL IMMED on your
7878 nick, in which case, as you say, you're SOL. The solution is to not let
7879 people watch you type your password.
7880
7881 --Andrew Church
7882 achurch@achurch.org
7883 http://achurch.org/
7884
7885
7886
7887 ------------------------------
7888
7889 Message: 11
7890 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:59:09 -0400
7891 From: "David D. Wachtveitl" <dwachtve@hotmail.com>
7892 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7893 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
7894 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7895 Message-ID: <SEA2-DAV6wZKxnEzY0W00010f3c@hotmail.com>
7896 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
7897
7898 Well, except on nicks you have the option, on the channel founder you do
7899 not, is that not the whole point trying to be made here? In this day and
7900 age, it is getting to the point where you can barely go to the bathroom
7901 without being "watched" in some manner. The real answer would be to crypt
7902 the passwords (so they can't be snooped/sniffed) and to not allow them to be
7903 seen on the screen. Knowing that is not going to happen, the current
7904 suggestion would be a good solution.
7905
7906 Just my .02
7907
7908 ----- Original Message -----
7909 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
7910 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
7911 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:42 PM
7912 Subject: Re: RE: RE: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7913
7914
7915 > >Also, it would prevent an "over the shoulder" viewer of the password the
7916 > >ability to use it. I keep an access mask on my nick ident for this very
7917 > >reason. I think it makes some sense to have this on the channel founder
7918 as
7919 > >well (as an option). Of course, if for some reason you are the founder
7920 and
7921 > >no longer have access to the mask you set for yourself, you could be sol
7922 > >also :P
7923 >
7924 > The same issue applies for nicks, since you can identify regardless
7925 of
7926 > whether you match an access mask or not--unless you set KILL IMMED on your
7927 > nick, in which case, as you say, you're SOL. The solution is to not let
7928 > people watch you type your password.
7929 >
7930 > --Andrew Church
7931 > achurch@achurch.org
7932 > http://achurch.org/
7933 >
7934 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7935 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7936 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7937 >
7938
7939
7940
7941 ------------------------------
7942
7943 _______________________________________________
7944 IRCServices mailing list
7945 IRCServices@ircservices.za.net
7946 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7947
7948
7949 End of IRCServices Digest, Vol 16, Issue 6
7950 ******************************************
7951
7952
7953
7954 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed Apr 14 02:57:14 2004
7955 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
7956 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7957 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7958 Message-ID: <200404140957.i3E9vFv16184@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
7959
7960 this might be a bad idea because any lamer can come along and /cs identify for a channel with this option set 3 times, and suspend it, causing it to become unusable for everyone in it. IMHO suspend should be something *ONLY* services admins/opers can set.
7961
7962 <insert 0.02c here>
7963
7964 >Im not sure but when someone try to identify a channet
7965 >too many times with wrong password, chanserv suspends
7966 >this channel for some days. This command will prevent
7967 >any lame user who try to do this. And something else.
7968 >If the real founder want to activate this command to
7969 >his channel he must think the possibility to lose his
7970 >nick password. But this command is optional if someone
7971 >wants this type of security will enable it, if someone
7972 >doesnt like this will not enable it.... Is this right
7973 >or not?
7974 >
7975 >=====
7976 >Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
7977 >
7978 >
7979 >------------------------------------------------------------------
7980 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7981 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7982
7983
7984
7985 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Apr 14 04:05:59 2004
7986 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
7987 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:05 2004
7988 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
7989 Message-ID: <20040414110559.8285.qmail@web86104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
7990
7991 Just add it because many users want it. Anyway i knew
7992 that the answer will be no (of course, what else...)
7993
7994 =====
7995 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
7996
7997
7998
7999 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Apr 14 04:06:43 2004
8000 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
8001 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8002 Subject: [IRCServices] secure Identify Feature..
8003 Message-ID: <20040414110643.55663.qmail@web86106.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
8004
8005 Just add it because many users want it. Anyway i knew
8006 that the answer will be no (of course, what else...)
8007
8008 =====
8009 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
8010
8011
8012
8013 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Thu Apr 15 02:52:41 2004
8014 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
8015 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8016 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8017 Message-ID: <19a5e9a19a4a4e.19a4a4e19a5e9a@shaw.ca>
8018
8019 I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8020
8021 (02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8022 (02:36) -ChanServ-
8023 (02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing you from
8024 (02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default, limited to users
8025 (02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the channel.
8026
8027 "removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8028
8029 Here's the Scenario:
8030
8031 Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8032 Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8033
8034 (02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8035 -=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8036 (02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8037 (02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8038 (02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8039 -=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in #underdog)
8040
8041 As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8042
8043 Regards,
8044
8045 Jason Mainwaring
8046 A+ Service Technician
8047 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8048 MCSA Messaging
8049 Certified Novell Administrator
8050 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8051 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8052
8053
8054
8055 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Apr 15 19:48:37 2004
8056 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
8057 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8058 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8059 In-Reply-To: <19a5e9a19a4a4e.19a4a4e19a5e9a@shaw.ca>
8060 Message-ID: <407e6890.17156@achurch.org>
8061
8062 What version are you using?
8063
8064 --Andrew Church
8065 achurch@achurch.org
8066 http://achurch.org/
8067
8068 >I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8069 >
8070 >(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8071 >(02:36) -ChanServ-
8072 >(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing you from
8073 >(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default, limited to users
8074 >(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the channel.
8075 >
8076 >"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8077 >
8078 >Here's the Scenario:
8079 >
8080 >Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8081 >Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8082 >
8083 >(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8084 >-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8085 >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8086 >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8087 >(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8088 >-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in #underdog)
8089 >
8090 >As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
8091 > you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8092 >
8093 >Regards,
8094 >
8095 >Jason Mainwaring
8096 >A+ Service Technician
8097 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8098 >MCSA Messaging
8099 >Certified Novell Administrator
8100 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8101 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8102 >
8103 >
8104 >------------------------------------------------------------------
8105 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8106
8107
8108 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Thu Apr 15 04:36:51 2004
8109 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
8110 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8111 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8112 Message-ID: <19a1bc419a3ddb.19a3ddb19a1bc4@shaw.ca>
8113
8114 We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
8115
8116 ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled Fri Apr 9 22:58:02 EST 2004
8117
8118 Regards,
8119
8120 Jason Mainwaring
8121 A+ Service Technician
8122 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8123 MCSA Messaging
8124 Certified Novell Administrator
8125 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8126 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8127
8128 ----- Original Message -----
8129 From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
8130 Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:48 am
8131 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8132
8133 > What version are you using?
8134 >
8135 > --Andrew Church
8136 > achurch@achurch.org
8137 > http://achurch.org/
8138 >
8139 > >I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8140 > >
8141 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8142 > >(02:36) -ChanServ-
8143 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing
8144 > you from
8145 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
8146 > limited to users
8147 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the
8148 > channel.>
8149 > >"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this
8150 > is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8151 > >
8152 > >Here's the Scenario:
8153 > >
8154 > >Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8155 > >Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8156 > >
8157 > >(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8158 > >-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
8159 > Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8160 > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8161 > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8162 > >(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
8163 > DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8164 > >-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in #underdog)
8165 > >
8166 > >As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing me
8167 > from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well
8168 > as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set
8169 > a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
8170 > > you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a
8171 > netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8172 > >
8173 > >Regards,
8174 > >
8175 > >Jason Mainwaring
8176 > >A+ Service Technician
8177 > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8178 > >MCSA Messaging
8179 > >Certified Novell Administrator
8180 > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8181 > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8182 > >
8183 > >
8184 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
8185 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8186 >
8187 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8188 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8189 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8190 >
8191
8192
8193
8194 From emurphy at sporked.us Thu Apr 15 06:41:38 2004
8195 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric)
8196 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8197 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8198 References: <19a1bc419a3ddb.19a3ddb19a1bc4@shaw.ca>
8199 Message-ID: <005601c422ef$6a831480$4200a8c0@eternalcomputers.net>
8200
8201 You should look at this message that was sent the day before yesterday... I
8202 don't know if that bug was fixed, but it looks like a lot were.
8203
8204 Eric Murphy
8205
8206 Quoting from the message -
8207 ----- Original Message -----
8208 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
8209 To: "services" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
8210 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:38 PM
8211 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.30 released
8212
8213
8214 > Services 5.0.30 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
8215 >
8216 > ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (USA, California)
8217 >
8218 > 15d8c01946ea6bdcc173b561c6576cb0 ircservices-5.0.30.tar.gz
8219 > 350b43673ffc65ab4977898f5c4b861f ircservices-5.0.30.diff.gz
8220 > b7663327556ae06b617f35c3cdf64338 ircservices-5.0.30-1.i386.rpm
8221 > 8bdbaa265fd38cd70d836392b8614708 ircservices_5.0.30-1_i386.deb
8222 >
8223 > ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
8224 >
8225 > This is a maintenance release including fixes for the various issues
8226 > that have been raised over the last couple of weeks. See below for
8227 > details.
8228 >
8229 > Changes in version 5.0.30
8230 > -------------------------
8231 > 2004/04/09 Added logic to configure script to avoid the use of the
8232 > -fstack-protector option if doing so would trigger a
8233 > compiler bug. Reported by Torbjo"rn Svennson
8234 > <azoff@se.linux.org>
8235 > 2004/04/06 ChanServ no longer requires an explicit IDENTIFY to use INFO
8236 > ALL. Reported by Wolfgang Urban <ircservices@tou.de>
8237 > 2004/04/06 NickServ LISTCHANS now properly aborts when a non-servadmin
8238 > uses the nickname form of the command. Reported by
8239 > Elijah <admin@nevernet.net>
8240 > 2004/04/04 The ChanServ DEPROTECT command now clears channel-owner
8241 > status on those IRC servers that support such a mode.
8242 > Suggested by <freakycomputer@global.co.za>
8243 > 2004/04/02 Fixed additional bug causing autokill exclusions to not
8244 > function properly in some cases.
8245 > 2004/04/02 Fixed bug causing autokill exclusions to not function under
8246 > Unreal. Reported by Eric Murphy <emurphy@sporked.us>
8247 > 2004/03/31 Fixed bug allowing users to improperly be identified for
8248 > newly-registered nicknames awaiting authentication.
8249 > Reported by <cyberdems@cyberdems.za.net>
8250 > 2004/03/30 Added workaround for Unreal SQLINE "bouncing" issue.
8251 > Reported by Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
8252 > 2004/03/30 ChanServ SET RESTRICTED no longer modifies the internal
8253 > NOJOIN level.
8254 > 2004/03/30 Fixed failure to reset internal-use AUTODEOP and NOJOIN
8255 > channel levels when loading databases from version 4.5
8256 > and earlier. Reported by Wolfgang Urban
8257 > <ircservices-coding@tou.de>
8258 >
8259 >
8260 > --Andrew Church
8261 > achurch@achurch.org
8262 > http://achurch.org/
8263 >
8264 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8265 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8266 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8267 ----- Original Message -----
8268 From: "JASON M" <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
8269 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
8270 Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:36 AM
8271 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8272
8273
8274 > We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
8275 >
8276 > ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled Fri Apr 9
8277 22:58:02 EST 2004
8278 >
8279 > Regards,
8280 >
8281 > Jason Mainwaring
8282 > A+ Service Technician
8283 > Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8284 > MCSA Messaging
8285 > Certified Novell Administrator
8286 > Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8287 > E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8288 >
8289 > ----- Original Message -----
8290 > From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
8291 > Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:48 am
8292 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8293 >
8294 > > What version are you using?
8295 > >
8296 > > --Andrew Church
8297 > > achurch@achurch.org
8298 > > http://achurch.org/
8299 > >
8300 > > >I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8301 > > >
8302 > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8303 > > >(02:36) -ChanServ-
8304 > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing
8305 > > you from
8306 > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
8307 > > limited to users
8308 > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the
8309 > > channel.>
8310 > > >"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this
8311 > > is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8312 > > >
8313 > > >Here's the Scenario:
8314 > > >
8315 > > >Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8316 > > >Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8317 > > >
8318 > > >(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8319 > > >-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
8320 > > Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8321 > > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8322 > > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8323 > > >(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
8324 > > DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8325 > > >-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in #underdog)
8326 > > >
8327 > > >As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing me
8328 > > from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well
8329 > > as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set
8330 > > a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
8331 > > > you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a
8332 > > netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8333 > > >
8334 > > >Regards,
8335 > > >
8336 > > >Jason Mainwaring
8337 > > >A+ Service Technician
8338 > > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8339 > > >MCSA Messaging
8340 > > >Certified Novell Administrator
8341 > > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8342 > > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8343 > > >
8344 > > >
8345 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
8346 > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8347 > >
8348 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8349 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8350 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8351 > >
8352 >
8353 >
8354 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8355 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8356 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8357
8358
8359
8360 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Thu Apr 15 07:58:02 2004
8361 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
8362 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8363 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8364 Message-ID: <19bce6b19bc716.19bc71619bce6b@shaw.ca>
8365
8366 Thanks for that Eric, I just signed up today so I didn't receive that message. However it does not list anything about fixing a unban issue? I will load that as soon as I get time.
8367
8368 Regards,
8369
8370 Jason Mainwaring
8371 A+ Service Technician
8372 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8373 MCSA Messaging
8374 Certified Novell Administrator
8375 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8376 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8377
8378 ----- Original Message -----
8379 From: Eric <emurphy@sporked.us>
8380 Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:41 am
8381 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8382
8383 > You should look at this message that was sent the day before
8384 > yesterday... I
8385 > don't know if that bug was fixed, but it looks like a lot were.
8386 >
8387 > Eric Murphy
8388 >
8389 > Quoting from the message -
8390 > ----- Original Message -----
8391 > From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
8392 > To: "services" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
8393 > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:38 PM
8394 > Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.30 released
8395 >
8396 >
8397 > > Services 5.0.30 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
8398 > >
8399 > > ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (USA, California)
8400 > >
8401 > > 15d8c01946ea6bdcc173b561c6576cb0 ircservices-5.0.30.tar.gz
8402 > > 350b43673ffc65ab4977898f5c4b861f ircservices-5.0.30.diff.gz
8403 > > b7663327556ae06b617f35c3cdf64338 ircservices-5.0.30-1.i386.rpm
8404 > > 8bdbaa265fd38cd70d836392b8614708 ircservices_5.0.30-1_i386.deb
8405 > >
8406 > > ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
8407 > >
8408 > > This is a maintenance release including fixes for the
8409 > various issues
8410 > > that have been raised over the last couple of weeks. See below for
8411 > > details.
8412 > >
8413 > > Changes in version 5.0.30
8414 > > -------------------------
8415 > > 2004/04/09 Added logic to configure script to avoid the use of the
8416 > > -fstack-protector option if doing so would trigger a
8417 > > compiler bug. Reported by Torbjo"rn Svennson
8418 > > <azoff@se.linux.org>
8419 > > 2004/04/06 ChanServ no longer requires an explicit IDENTIFY to
8420 > use INFO
8421 > > ALL. Reported by Wolfgang Urban <ircservices@tou.de>
8422 > > 2004/04/06 NickServ LISTCHANS now properly aborts when a non-
8423 > servadmin> uses the nickname form of the command. Reported by
8424 > > Elijah <admin@nevernet.net>
8425 > > 2004/04/04 The ChanServ DEPROTECT command now clears channel-owner
8426 > > status on those IRC servers that support such a mode.
8427 > > Suggested by <freakycomputer@global.co.za>
8428 > > 2004/04/02 Fixed additional bug causing autokill exclusions to not
8429 > > function properly in some cases.
8430 > > 2004/04/02 Fixed bug causing autokill exclusions to not function
8431 > under> Unreal. Reported by Eric Murphy <emurphy@sporked.us>
8432 > > 2004/03/31 Fixed bug allowing users to improperly be identified for
8433 > > newly-registered nicknames awaiting authentication.
8434 > > Reported by <cyberdems@cyberdems.za.net>
8435 > > 2004/03/30 Added workaround for Unreal SQLINE "bouncing" issue.
8436 > > Reported by Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
8437 > > 2004/03/30 ChanServ SET RESTRICTED no longer modifies the internal
8438 > > NOJOIN level.
8439 > > 2004/03/30 Fixed failure to reset internal-use AUTODEOP and NOJOIN
8440 > > channel levels when loading databases from version 4.5
8441 > > and earlier. Reported by Wolfgang Urban
8442 > > <ircservices-coding@tou.de>
8443 > >
8444 > >
8445 > > --Andrew Church
8446 > > achurch@achurch.org
8447 > > http://achurch.org/
8448 > >
8449 > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
8450 > -
8451 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8452 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8453 > ----- Original Message -----
8454 > From: "JASON M" <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
8455 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
8456 > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004
8457 > 7:36 AM
8458 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8459 >
8460 >
8461 > > We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
8462 > >
8463 > > ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled
8464 > Fri Apr 9
8465 > 22:58:02 EST 2004
8466 > >
8467 > > Regards,
8468 > >
8469 > > Jason Mainwaring
8470 > > A+ Service Technician
8471 > > Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8472 > > MCSA Messaging
8473 > > Certified Novell Administrator
8474 > > Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8475 > > E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8476 > >
8477 > > ----- Original Message -----
8478 > > From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
8479 > > Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:48 am
8480 > > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8481 > >
8482 > > > What version are you using?
8483 > > >
8484 > > > --Andrew Church
8485 > > > achurch@achurch.org
8486 > > > http://achurch.org/
8487 > > >
8488 > > > >I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8489 > > > >
8490 > > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8491 > > > >(02:36) -ChanServ-
8492 > > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing
8493 > > > you from
8494 > > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
8495 > > > limited to users
8496 > > > >(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the
8497 > > > channel.>
8498 > > > >"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this
8499 > > > is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8500 > > > >
8501 > > > >Here's the Scenario:
8502 > > > >
8503 > > > >Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8504 > > > >Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8505 > > > >
8506 > > > >(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8507 > > > >-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
8508 > > > Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8509 > > > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8510 > > > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8511 > > > >(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
8512 > > > DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8513 > > > >-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in
8514 > #underdog)> > >
8515 > > > >As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans
8516 > preventing me
8517 > > > from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well
8518 > > > as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set
8519 > > > a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
8520 > > > > you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a
8521 > > > netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8522 > > > >
8523 > > > >Regards,
8524 > > > >
8525 > > > >Jason Mainwaring
8526 > > > >A+ Service Technician
8527 > > > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8528 > > > >MCSA Messaging
8529 > > > >Certified Novell Administrator
8530 > > > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8531 > > > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8532 > > > >
8533 > > > >
8534 > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------
8535 > ----
8536 > > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8537 > > >
8538 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
8539 > ---
8540 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8541 > > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8542 > > >
8543 > >
8544 > >
8545 > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
8546 > -
8547 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8548 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8549 >
8550 >
8551 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8552 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8553 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8554 >
8555
8556
8557
8558 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Apr 15 09:43:56 2004
8559 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
8560 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8561 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8562 Message-ID: <mailman.33.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
8563
8564 "We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
8565
8566 ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled Fri Apr 9 22:58:02 EST 2004"
8567
8568 So it might have been fixed in .30
8569
8570 /****************************************
8571 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8572 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
8573 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8574 ****************************************/
8575
8576
8577 /****************************************
8578 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
8579 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
8580 * Sent - 2004-04-15 19:48:37
8581 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8582 ****************************************/
8583
8584 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
8585
8586 > What version are you using?
8587 >
8588 > --Andrew Church
8589 > achurch@achurch.org
8590 > http://achurch.org/
8591 >
8592 >>I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8593 >>
8594 >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8595 >>(02:36) -ChanServ-
8596 >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing you from
8597 >>(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default, limited to users
8598 >>(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the channel.
8599 >>
8600 >>"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8601 >>
8602 >>Here's the Scenario:
8603 >>
8604 >>Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8605 >>Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8606 >>
8607 >>(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8608 >>-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8609 >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8610 >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8611 >>(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8612 >>-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in #underdog)
8613 >>
8614 >>As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
8615 >> you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8616 >>
8617 >>Regards,
8618 >>
8619 >>Jason Mainwaring
8620 >>A+ Service Technician
8621 >>Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8622 >>MCSA Messaging
8623 >>Certified Novell Administrator
8624 >>Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8625 >>E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8626 >>
8627 >>
8628 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
8629 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8630 >
8631 >------------------------------------------------------------------
8632 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8633 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8634 >.
8635
8636 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
8637
8638
8639
8640
8641 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Fri Apr 16 08:17:44 2004
8642 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
8643 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8644 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8645 Message-ID: <1b0cfe51b09426.1b094261b0cfe5@shaw.ca>
8646
8647 As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
8648
8649 Regards,
8650
8651 Jason Mainwaring
8652 A+ Service Technician
8653 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8654 MCSA Messaging
8655 Certified Novell Administrator
8656 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8657 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8658
8659 ----- Original Message -----
8660 From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
8661 Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:43 am
8662 Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8663
8664 > "We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
8665 >
8666 > ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled
8667 > Fri Apr 9 22:58:02 EST 2004"
8668 >
8669 > So it might have been fixed in .30
8670 >
8671 > /****************************************
8672 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8673 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
8674 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8675 > ****************************************/
8676 >
8677 >
8678 > /****************************************
8679 > * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
8680 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net
8681 > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-15 19:48:37
8682 > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8683 > ****************************************/
8684 >
8685 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
8686 >
8687 > > What version are you using?
8688 > >
8689 > > --Andrew Church
8690 > > achurch@achurch.org
8691 > > http://achurch.org/
8692 > >
8693 > >>I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8694 > >>
8695 > >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8696 > >>(02:36) -ChanServ-
8697 > >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing
8698 > you from
8699 > >>(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
8700 > limited to users
8701 > >>(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the
8702 > channel.>>
8703 > >>"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this
8704 > is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8705 > >>
8706 > >>Here's the Scenario:
8707 > >>
8708 > >>Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8709 > >>Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8710 > >>
8711 > >>(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8712 > >>-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
8713 > Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8714 > >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8715 > >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8716 > >>(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
8717 > DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8718 > >>-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in
8719 > #underdog)>>
8720 > >>As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing
8721 > me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as
8722 > well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone
8723 > set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
8724 > >> you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a
8725 > netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8726 > >>
8727 > >>Regards,
8728 > >>
8729 > >>Jason Mainwaring
8730 > >>A+ Service Technician
8731 > >>Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8732 > >>MCSA Messaging
8733 > >>Certified Novell Administrator
8734 > >>Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8735 > >>E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8736 > >>
8737 > >>
8738 > >>-----------------------------------------------------------------
8739 > -
8740 > >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8741 > >
8742 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
8743 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8744 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8745 > >.
8746 >
8747 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
8748 >
8749 >
8750 >
8751 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8752 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8753 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8754 >
8755
8756
8757
8758 From Craig at chatspike.net Fri Apr 16 08:47:19 2004
8759 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
8760 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8761 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8762 Message-ID: <mailman.34.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
8763
8764 Are your U:Lines set up properly? And are you getting messages regarding u:lines when you try an unban? (also, paste your U:Line if possible)
8765
8766 Thanks :)
8767
8768 /****************************************
8769 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8770 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
8771 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8772 ****************************************/
8773
8774
8775 /****************************************
8776 * From - JASON M <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
8777 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
8778 * Sent - 2004-04-16 16:17:44
8779 * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8780 ****************************************/
8781
8782 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
8783
8784 >As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
8785 >
8786 >Regards,
8787 >
8788 >Jason Mainwaring
8789 >A+ Service Technician
8790 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8791 >MCSA Messaging
8792 >Certified Novell Administrator
8793 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8794 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8795 >
8796 >----- Original Message -----
8797 >From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
8798 >Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:43 am
8799 >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8800 >
8801 >> "We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
8802 >>
8803 >> ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled
8804 >> Fri Apr 9 22:58:02 EST 2004"
8805 >>
8806 >> So it might have been fixed in .30
8807 >>
8808 >> /****************************************
8809 >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8810 >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
8811 >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8812 >> ****************************************/
8813 >>
8814 >>
8815 >> /****************************************
8816 >> * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
8817 >> * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net
8818 >> <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-15 19:48:37
8819 >> * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8820 >> ****************************************/
8821 >>
8822 >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
8823 >>
8824 >> > What version are you using?
8825 >> >
8826 >> > --Andrew Church
8827 >> > achurch@achurch.org
8828 >> > http://achurch.org/
8829 >> >
8830 >> >>I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8831 >> >>
8832 >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
8833 >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ-
8834 >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing
8835 >> you from
8836 >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
8837 >> limited to users
8838 >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the
8839 >> channel.>>
8840 >> >>"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this
8841 >> is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
8842 >> >>
8843 >> >>Here's the Scenario:
8844 >> >>
8845 >> >>Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
8846 >> >>Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
8847 >> >>
8848 >> >>(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
8849 >> >>-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
8850 >> Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
8851 >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8852 >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
8853 >> >>(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
8854 >> DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
8855 >> >>-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in
8856 >> #underdog)>>
8857 >> >>As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing
8858 >> me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as
8859 >> well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone
8860 >> set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
8861 >> >> you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a
8862 >> netadmin I am not prevented ;)
8863 >> >>
8864 >> >>Regards,
8865 >> >>
8866 >> >>Jason Mainwaring
8867 >> >>A+ Service Technician
8868 >> >>Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8869 >> >>MCSA Messaging
8870 >> >>Certified Novell Administrator
8871 >> >>Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8872 >> >>E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8873 >> >>
8874 >> >>
8875 >> >>-----------------------------------------------------------------
8876 >> -
8877 >> >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8878 >> >
8879 >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
8880 >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8881 >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8882 >> >.
8883 >>
8884 >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
8885 >>
8886 >>
8887 >>
8888 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
8889 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8890 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8891 >>
8892 >
8893 >
8894 >------------------------------------------------------------------
8895 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8896 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8897 >.
8898
8899 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
8900
8901
8902
8903
8904 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Fri Apr 16 09:18:43 2004
8905 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
8906 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
8907 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8908 Message-ID: <1b1f3a61b1f8e4.1b1f8e41b1f3a6@shaw.ca>
8909
8910 We know how to run a IRC Network ;)
8911 Our U:Lines are fine and everything works perfectly except UNBAN which will work fine if you don't use the IP address of the user. It doesn't lookup IP's thats it's only flaw. just to keep you happy though, we have U:Lined Services.street-creed.com and yes it is global on all servers (specified in each config), and yes It's matched case :)
8912
8913 Regards,
8914
8915 Jason Mainwaring
8916 A+ Service Technician
8917 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8918 MCSA Messaging
8919 Certified Novell Administrator
8920 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8921 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8922
8923 ----- Original Message -----
8924 From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
8925 Date: Friday, April 16, 2004 8:47 am
8926 Subject: Re: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8927
8928 > Are your U:Lines set up properly? And are you getting messages
8929 > regarding u:lines when you try an unban? (also, paste your U:Line
8930 > if possible)
8931 >
8932 > Thanks :)
8933 >
8934 > /****************************************
8935 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8936 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
8937 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8938 > ****************************************/
8939 >
8940 >
8941 > /****************************************
8942 > * From - JASON M <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
8943 > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
8944 > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-16 16:17:44
8945 > * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8946 > ****************************************/
8947 >
8948 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
8949 >
8950 > >As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not
8951 > been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
8952 > >
8953 > >Regards,
8954 > >
8955 > >Jason Mainwaring
8956 > >A+ Service Technician
8957 > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
8958 > >MCSA Messaging
8959 > >Certified Novell Administrator
8960 > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
8961 > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
8962 > >
8963 > >----- Original Message -----
8964 > >From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
8965 > >Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:43 am
8966 > >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8967 > >
8968 > >> "We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
8969 > >>
8970 > >> ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled
8971 > >> Fri Apr 9 22:58:02 EST 2004"
8972 > >>
8973 > >> So it might have been fixed in .30
8974 > >>
8975 > >> /****************************************
8976 > >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8977 > >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
8978 > >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8979 > >> ****************************************/
8980 > >>
8981 > >>
8982 > >> /****************************************
8983 > >> * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
8984 > >> * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net
8985 > >> <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-15 19:48:37
8986 > >> * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
8987 > >> ****************************************/
8988 > >>
8989 > >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
8990 > >>
8991 > >> > What version are you using?
8992 > >> >
8993 > >> > --Andrew Church
8994 > >> > achurch@achurch.org
8995 > >> > http://achurch.org/
8996 > >> >
8997 > >> >>I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
8998 > >> >>
8999 > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
9000 > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ-
9001 > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans
9002 > preventing
9003 > >> you from
9004 > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
9005 > >> limited to users
9006 > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on
9007 > the
9008 > >> channel.>>
9009 > >> >>"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel",
9010 > this
9011 > >> is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
9012 > >> >>
9013 > >> >>Here's the Scenario:
9014 > >> >>
9015 > >> >>Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
9016 > >> >>Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
9017 > >> >>
9018 > >> >>(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
9019 > >> >>-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
9020 > >> Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
9021 > >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9022 > >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9023 > >> >>(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
9024 > >> DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
9025 > >> >>-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in
9026 > >> #underdog)>>
9027 > >> >>As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans
9028 > preventing
9029 > >> me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts
9030 > as
9031 > >> well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If
9032 > someone
9033 > >> set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
9034 > >> >> you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a
9035 > >> netadmin I am not prevented ;)
9036 > >> >>
9037 > >> >>Regards,
9038 > >> >>
9039 > >> >>Jason Mainwaring
9040 > >> >>A+ Service Technician
9041 > >> >>Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9042 > >> >>MCSA Messaging
9043 > >> >>Certified Novell Administrator
9044 > >> >>Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9045 > >> >>E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9046 > >> >>
9047 > >> >>
9048 > >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------
9049 > ---
9050 > >> -
9051 > >> >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9052 > >> >
9053 > >> >---------------------------------------------------------------
9054 > ---
9055 > >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9056 > >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9057 > >> >.
9058 > >>
9059 > >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
9060 > >>
9061 > >>
9062 > >>
9063 > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
9064 > --
9065 > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9066 > >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9067 > >>
9068 > >
9069 > >
9070 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
9071 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9072 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9073 > >.
9074 >
9075 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
9076 >
9077 >
9078 >
9079 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9080 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9081 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9082 >
9083
9084
9085
9086 From accountnamehere at yahoo.co.uk Sat Apr 17 14:02:47 2004
9087 From: accountnamehere at yahoo.co.uk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Ashen?=)
9088 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9089 Subject: [IRCServices] the idea of operflags
9090 Message-ID: <20040417210247.44991.qmail@web25109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
9091
9092 I've noticed that quite a lot of services packages now have, instead of a
9093 "levels" based system of oper access to services, (such as oper < services
9094 oper < services admin < services root), a "flags" system of access.
9095
9096 This "flags" system is really very simple, commands (or groups of
9097 commands)
9098 each have flags that you must posess in order to use them.
9099
9100 For example, there could be one flag for having admin access to forbid
9101 channels, another to drop/force register channels, another to set things
9102 like the channel password, and another to use 'sendpass'.
9103
9104 The benifits of this system are clear, much more finely tuned operator
9105 access to services according to job, greater access seperation, and a much
9106 more flexible services package overall.
9107
9108 Are there any plans to implement such a feature into ircservices?
9109 Other packages are already implementing it, and it's a really nice feature
9110 a lot of us would like to see.
9111
9112 -Ashen
9113
9114
9115
9116
9117
9118 ____________________________________________________________
9119 Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
9120 your friends today! Download Messenger Now
9121 http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
9122
9123
9124 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Apr 17 14:47:50 2004
9125 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
9126 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9127 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9128 Message-ID: <200404172147.i3HLlp125518@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
9129
9130 i think this is because your cloak keys are different on different servers? they need to be the same all over your network.
9131
9132 >I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
9133 >
9134 >(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
9135 >(02:36) -ChanServ-
9136 >(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing you from
9137 >(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default, limited to users
9138 >(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the channel.
9139 >
9140 >"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
9141 >
9142 >Here's the Scenario:
9143 >
9144 >Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
9145 >Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
9146 >
9147 >(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
9148 >-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
9149 >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9150 >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9151 >(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
9152 >-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in #underdog)
9153 >
9154 >As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a netadmin I am not prevented ;)
9155 >
9156 >Regards,
9157 >
9158 >Jason Mainwaring
9159 >A+ Service Technician
9160 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9161 >MCSA Messaging
9162 >Certified Novell Administrator
9163 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9164 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9165 >
9166 >
9167 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9168 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9169 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9170
9171
9172
9173 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Apr 18 08:53:58 2004
9174 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9175 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9176 Subject: [IRCServices] the idea of operflags
9177 In-Reply-To: <20040417210247.44991.qmail@web25109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
9178 Message-ID: <4081c540.01747@achurch.org>
9179
9180 >I've noticed that quite a lot of services packages now have, instead of a
9181 >"levels" based system of oper access to services, (such as oper < services
9182 >oper < services admin < services root), a "flags" system of access.
9183 >
9184 >This "flags" system is really very simple, commands (or groups of
9185 >commands)
9186 >each have flags that you must posess in order to use them.
9187 >
9188 >For example, there could be one flag for having admin access to forbid
9189 >channels, another to drop/force register channels, another to set things
9190 >like the channel password, and another to use 'sendpass'.
9191
9192 I'm not quite sure how this is "simple" compared to the current
9193 system...
9194
9195 >The benifits of this system are clear, much more finely tuned operator
9196 >access to services according to job, greater access seperation, and a much
9197 >more flexible services package overall.
9198
9199 On the other hand, drawbacks include more complex configuration, more
9200 complex code (meaning more potential bugs), and more annoyance when trying
9201 to deal with people who can't get it set up right.
9202
9203 Still, the issue of inflexibility in the current system has been
9204 raised before, and I may consider modifying it to allow more customization
9205 in version 5.1 or later. I will not be making any changes in 5.0.
9206
9207 --Andrew Church
9208 achurch@achurch.org
9209 http://achurch.org/
9210
9211
9212 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Sat Apr 17 23:09:42 2004
9213 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
9214 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9215 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9216 Message-ID: <1c731491c73a6b.1c73a6b1c73149@shaw.ca>
9217
9218 I checked the cloak keys, there were two old ircd's with wrong keys. I updated them restarted, unfortunetely that did not fix the issue. The UNBAN problem still occurs, but at least the cloak keys are updated now ;)
9219
9220 Regards,
9221
9222 Jason Mainwaring
9223 A+ Service Technician
9224 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9225 MCSA Messaging
9226 Certified Novell Administrator
9227 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9228 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9229
9230 ----- Original Message -----
9231 From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
9232 Date: Saturday, April 17, 2004 2:47 pm
9233 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9234
9235 > i think this is because your cloak keys are different on different
9236 > servers? they need to be the same all over your network.
9237 >
9238 > >I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
9239 > >
9240 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
9241 > >(02:36) -ChanServ-
9242 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans preventing
9243 > you from
9244 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
9245 > limited to users
9246 > >(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on the
9247 > channel.>
9248 > >"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel", this
9249 > is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
9250 > >
9251 > >Here's the Scenario:
9252 > >
9253 > >Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
9254 > >Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
9255 > >
9256 > >(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
9257 > >-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
9258 > Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
9259 > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9260 > >(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9261 > >(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
9262 > DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
9263 > >-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in #underdog)
9264 > >
9265 > >As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans preventing me
9266 > from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts as well
9267 > as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If someone set
9268 > a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address you would
9269 > be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a netadmin I am
9270 > not prevented ;)
9271 > >
9272 > >Regards,
9273 > >
9274 > >Jason Mainwaring
9275 > >A+ Service Technician
9276 > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9277 > >MCSA Messaging
9278 > >Certified Novell Administrator
9279 > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9280 > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9281 > >
9282 > >
9283 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
9284 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9285 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9286 >
9287 >
9288 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9289 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9290 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9291 >
9292
9293
9294
9295 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Apr 18 18:38:04 2004
9296 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9297 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9298 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9299 In-Reply-To: <1b0cfe51b09426.1b094261b0cfe5@shaw.ca>
9300 Message-ID: <40824df6.02052@achurch.org>
9301
9302 >As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
9303
9304 You're using Unreal, yes? I looked into the problem, and it seems
9305 that Unreal is applying bans based on client IP address as well as real and
9306 fake hostmasks. The problem with this is that the Unreal protocol doesn't
9307 send client IP addresses to other servers (Services included), so Services
9308 doesn't have any way to tell whether a given ban will match a client's IP
9309 address. In short, you're SOL unless you can switch to another ircd. I'll
9310 note this in the FAQ for the next release.
9311
9312 --Andrew Church
9313 achurch@achurch.org
9314 http://achurch.org/
9315
9316
9317 From Craig at chatspike.net Sun Apr 18 06:30:11 2004
9318 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
9319 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9320 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9321 Message-ID: <mailman.35.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
9322
9323 Cant you get services to use cloaked keys? this way you can 'decrypt' the encrypted parts, allowing for proper functionality.
9324
9325 /****************************************
9326 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9327 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
9328 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9329 ****************************************/
9330
9331
9332 /****************************************
9333 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
9334 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
9335 * Sent - 2004-04-18 18:38:04
9336 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9337 ****************************************/
9338
9339 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
9340
9341 >>As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
9342 >
9343 > You're using Unreal, yes? I looked into the problem, and it seems
9344 >that Unreal is applying bans based on client IP address as well as real and
9345 >fake hostmasks. The problem with this is that the Unreal protocol doesn't
9346 >send client IP addresses to other servers (Services included), so Services
9347 >doesn't have any way to tell whether a given ban will match a client's IP
9348 >address. In short, you're SOL unless you can switch to another ircd. I'll
9349 >note this in the FAQ for the next release.
9350 >
9351 > --Andrew Church
9352 > achurch@achurch.org
9353 > http://achurch.org/
9354 >
9355 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9356 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9357 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9358 >.
9359
9360 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
9361
9362
9363
9364
9365 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sun Apr 18 06:31:59 2004
9366 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
9367 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9368 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9369 Message-ID: <200404181332.i3IDW0112608@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
9370
9371 as i see it the best way to support/fix this would be to allow the unrealircd module to support cloak-keys as provided by unreal itself so it can encode/decode cloaked hosts.
9372
9373 <insert 0.02 here>
9374
9375 >>As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
9376 >
9377 > You're using Unreal, yes? I looked into the problem, and it seems
9378 >that Unreal is applying bans based on client IP address as well as real and
9379 >fake hostmasks. The problem with this is that the Unreal protocol doesn't
9380 >send client IP addresses to other servers (Services included), so Services
9381 >doesn't have any way to tell whether a given ban will match a client's IP
9382 >address. In short, you're SOL unless you can switch to another ircd. I'll
9383 >note this in the FAQ for the next release.
9384 >
9385 > --Andrew Church
9386 > achurch@achurch.org
9387 > http://achurch.org/
9388 >
9389 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9390 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9391 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9392
9393
9394
9395 From quension at mac.com Sun Apr 18 16:31:07 2004
9396 From: quension at mac.com (Trevor Talbot)
9397 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9398 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9399 In-Reply-To: <200404181332.i3IDW0112608@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
9400 Message-ID: <77D3A597-9190-11D8-B3D3-0003938D6866@mac.com>
9401
9402 On Sunday, Apr 18, 2004, at 06:30 US/Pacific, Craig McLure wrote:
9403
9404 > Cant you get services to use cloaked keys? this way you can 'decrypt'
9405 > the encrypted parts, allowing for proper functionality.
9406
9407 On Sunday, Apr 18, 2004, at 06:31 US/Pacific, Craig Edwards wrote:
9408
9409 > as i see it the best way to support/fix this would be to allow the
9410 > unrealircd module to support cloak-keys as provided by unreal itself
9411 > so it can encode/decode cloaked hosts.
9412
9413 Unreal already sends both the real and fake hosts, so services is
9414 capable of dealing with them. The issue is the client's real IP, not
9415 its hostname.
9416
9417 -- Quension
9418
9419 >> You're using Unreal, yes? I looked into the problem, and it
9420 >> seems that Unreal is applying bans based on client IP address as well
9421 >> as real and fake hostmasks. The problem with this is that the Unreal
9422 >> protocol doesn't send client IP addresses to other servers (Services
9423 >> included), so Services doesn't have any way to tell whether a given
9424 >> ban will match a client's IP address. In short, you're SOL unless
9425 >> you can switch to another ircd. I'll note this in the FAQ for the
9426 >> next release.
9427 >>
9428 >> --Andrew Church
9429 >> achurch@achurch.org
9430 >> http://achurch.org/
9431
9432
9433
9434 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Apr 19 10:04:34 2004
9435 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9436 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9437 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9438 In-Reply-To: <40828341.63032@mail.achurch.org>
9439 Message-ID: <408325d2.03302@achurch.org>
9440
9441 >Cant you get services to use cloaked keys? this way you can 'decrypt' the encrypted parts, allowing for proper functionality.
9442
9443 This only works if the encrypted IP is actually sent; if the client's
9444 host resolves, or if the fake host is set to something else, there's no IP
9445 information to decode in the first place.
9446
9447 --Andrew Church
9448 achurch@achurch.org
9449 http://achurch.org/
9450
9451
9452 From ballsy at mystical.net Mon Apr 19 11:02:39 2004
9453 From: ballsy at mystical.net (Ballsy)
9454 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9455 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9456 In-Reply-To: <1b1f3a61b1f8e4.1b1f8e41b1f3a6@shaw.ca>
9457 References: <1b1f3a61b1f8e4.1b1f8e41b1f3a6@shaw.ca>
9458 Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.0.20040419120043.01acfc70@127.0.0.1>
9459
9460 At 10:18 AM 16/04/2004, JASON M wrote:
9461 >We know how to run a IRC Network ;)
9462
9463 For future reference, when folks feel the need to list their
9464 credentials in their email sig, some of us generally infer that you don't.
9465
9466
9467
9468
9469 >Our U:Lines are fine and everything works perfectly except UNBAN which
9470 >will work fine if you don't use the IP address of the user. It doesn't
9471 >lookup IP's thats it's only flaw. just to keep you happy though, we have
9472 >U:Lined Services.street-creed.com and yes it is global on all servers
9473 >(specified in each config), and yes It's matched case :)
9474 >
9475 >Regards,
9476 >
9477 >Jason Mainwaring
9478 >A+ Service Technician
9479 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9480 >MCSA Messaging
9481 >Certified Novell Administrator
9482 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9483 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9484 >
9485 >----- Original Message -----
9486 >From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
9487 >Date: Friday, April 16, 2004 8:47 am
9488 >Subject: Re: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9489 >
9490 > > Are your U:Lines set up properly? And are you getting messages
9491 > > regarding u:lines when you try an unban? (also, paste your U:Line
9492 > > if possible)
9493 > >
9494 > > Thanks :)
9495 > >
9496 > > /****************************************
9497 > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9498 > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
9499 > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9500 > > ****************************************/
9501 > >
9502 > >
9503 > > /****************************************
9504 > > * From - JASON M <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
9505 > > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
9506 > > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-16 16:17:44
9507 > > * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9508 > > ****************************************/
9509 > >
9510 > > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
9511 > >
9512 > > >As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not
9513 > > been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
9514 > > >
9515 > > >Regards,
9516 > > >
9517 > > >Jason Mainwaring
9518 > > >A+ Service Technician
9519 > > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9520 > > >MCSA Messaging
9521 > > >Certified Novell Administrator
9522 > > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9523 > > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9524 > > >
9525 > > >----- Original Message -----
9526 > > >From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
9527 > > >Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:43 am
9528 > > >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9529 > > >
9530 > > >> "We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services recently.
9531 > > >>
9532 > > >> ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled
9533 > > >> Fri Apr 9 22:58:02 EST 2004"
9534 > > >>
9535 > > >> So it might have been fixed in .30
9536 > > >>
9537 > > >> /****************************************
9538 > > >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9539 > > >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
9540 > > >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9541 > > >> ****************************************/
9542 > > >>
9543 > > >>
9544 > > >> /****************************************
9545 > > >> * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
9546 > > >> * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net
9547 > > >> <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-15 19:48:37
9548 > > >> * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9549 > > >> ****************************************/
9550 > > >>
9551 > > >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
9552 > > >>
9553 > > >> > What version are you using?
9554 > > >> >
9555 > > >> > --Andrew Church
9556 > > >> > achurch@achurch.org
9557 > > >> > http://achurch.org/
9558 > > >> >
9559 > > >> >>I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
9560 > > >> >>
9561 > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
9562 > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ-
9563 > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans
9564 > > preventing
9565 > > >> you from
9566 > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
9567 > > >> limited to users
9568 > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on
9569 > > the
9570 > > >> channel.>>
9571 > > >> >>"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel",
9572 > > this
9573 > > >> is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
9574 > > >> >>
9575 > > >> >>Here's the Scenario:
9576 > > >> >>
9577 > > >> >>Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
9578 > > >> >>Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
9579 > > >> >>
9580 > > >> >>(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
9581 > > >> >>-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
9582 > > >> Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
9583 > > >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9584 > > >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9585 > > >> >>(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
9586 > > >> DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
9587 > > >> >>-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in
9588 > > >> #underdog)>>
9589 > > >> >>As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans
9590 > > preventing
9591 > > >> me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts
9592 > > as
9593 > > >> well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If
9594 > > someone
9595 > > >> set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
9596 > > >> >> you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how being a
9597 > > >> netadmin I am not prevented ;)
9598 > > >> >>
9599 > > >> >>Regards,
9600 > > >> >>
9601 > > >> >>Jason Mainwaring
9602 > > >> >>A+ Service Technician
9603 > > >> >>Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9604 > > >> >>MCSA Messaging
9605 > > >> >>Certified Novell Administrator
9606 > > >> >>Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9607 > > >> >>E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9608 > > >> >>
9609 > > >> >>
9610 > > >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------
9611 > > ---
9612 > > >> -
9613 > > >> >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9614 > > >> >
9615 > > >> >---------------------------------------------------------------
9616 > > ---
9617 > > >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9618 > > >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9619 > > >> >.
9620 > > >>
9621 > > >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
9622 > > >>
9623 > > >>
9624 > > >>
9625 > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
9626 > > --
9627 > > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9628 > > >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9629 > > >>
9630 > > >
9631 > > >
9632 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
9633 > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9634 > > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9635 > > >.
9636 > >
9637 > > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
9638 > >
9639 > >
9640 > >
9641 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9642 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9643 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9644 > >
9645 >
9646 >
9647 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9648 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9649 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9650
9651
9652
9653
9654 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Tue Apr 20 22:34:21 2004
9655 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
9656 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9657 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9658 Message-ID: <21e65121b1fa.21b1fa21e651@shaw.ca>
9659
9660 If thats how you feel. I use my e-mail sig for reasons other than this mailing list, so you can settle down. Take a deep breath and stop flaming. It's called Professionalism.
9661
9662 Regards,
9663
9664 Jason Mainwaring
9665 A+ Service Technician
9666 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9667 MCSA Messaging
9668 Certified Novell Administrator
9669 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9670 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9671
9672 ----- Original Message -----
9673 From: Ballsy <ballsy@mystical.net>
9674 Date: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:02 am
9675 Subject: Re: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9676
9677 > At 10:18 AM 16/04/2004, JASON M wrote:
9678 > >We know how to run a IRC Network ;)
9679 >
9680 > For future reference, when folks feel the need to list
9681 > their
9682 > credentials in their email sig, some of us generally infer that
9683 > you don't.
9684 >
9685 >
9686 >
9687 >
9688 > >Our U:Lines are fine and everything works perfectly except UNBAN
9689 > which
9690 > >will work fine if you don't use the IP address of the user. It
9691 > doesn't
9692 > >lookup IP's thats it's only flaw. just to keep you happy though,
9693 > we have
9694 > >U:Lined Services.street-creed.com and yes it is global on all
9695 > servers
9696 > >(specified in each config), and yes It's matched case :)
9697 > >
9698 > >Regards,
9699 > >
9700 > >Jason Mainwaring
9701 > >A+ Service Technician
9702 > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9703 > >MCSA Messaging
9704 > >Certified Novell Administrator
9705 > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9706 > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9707 > >
9708 > >----- Original Message -----
9709 > >From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
9710 > >Date: Friday, April 16, 2004 8:47 am
9711 > >Subject: Re: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9712 > >
9713 > > > Are your U:Lines set up properly? And are you getting messages
9714 > > > regarding u:lines when you try an unban? (also, paste your U:Line
9715 > > > if possible)
9716 > > >
9717 > > > Thanks :)
9718 > > >
9719 > > > /****************************************
9720 > > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9721 > > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
9722 > > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9723 > > > ****************************************/
9724 > > >
9725 > > >
9726 > > > /****************************************
9727 > > > * From - JASON M <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
9728 > > > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
9729 > > > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-16 16:17:44
9730 > > > * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9731 > > > ****************************************/
9732 > > >
9733 > > > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
9734 > > >
9735 > > > >As I figured from the version change log, this issues has not
9736 > > > been fixed and still produces the same effect on .30
9737 > > > >
9738 > > > >Regards,
9739 > > > >
9740 > > > >Jason Mainwaring
9741 > > > >A+ Service Technician
9742 > > > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9743 > > > >MCSA Messaging
9744 > > > >Certified Novell Administrator
9745 > > > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9746 > > > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9747 > > > >
9748 > > > >----- Original Message -----
9749 > > > >From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
9750 > > > >Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:43 am
9751 > > > >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9752 > > > >
9753 > > > >> "We have just compiled the newer version of IRC Services
9754 > recently.> > >>
9755 > > > >> ircservices-5.0.29 Services.street-creed.com build #1, compiled
9756 > > > >> Fri Apr 9 22:58:02 EST 2004"
9757 > > > >>
9758 > > > >> So it might have been fixed in .30
9759 > > > >>
9760 > > > >> /****************************************
9761 > > > >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9762 > > > >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
9763 > > > >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9764 > > > >> ****************************************/
9765 > > > >>
9766 > > > >>
9767 > > > >> /****************************************
9768 > > > >> * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
9769 > > > >> * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net
9770 > > > >> <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-15
9771 > 19:48:37> > >> * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN Bug
9772 > > > >> ****************************************/
9773 > > > >>
9774 > > > >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
9775 > > > >>
9776 > > > >> > What version are you using?
9777 > > > >> >
9778 > > > >> > --Andrew Church
9779 > > > >> > achurch@achurch.org
9780 > > > >> > http://achurch.org/
9781 > > > >> >
9782 > > > >> >>I have found a bug in your Chanserv unban function.
9783 > > > >> >>
9784 > > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Syntax: UNBAN channel
9785 > > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ-
9786 > > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- Tells ChanServ to remove all bans
9787 > > > preventing
9788 > > > >> you from
9789 > > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- entering the given channel. By default,
9790 > > > >> limited to users
9791 > > > >> >>(02:36) -ChanServ- with level 50 (AOP) access and above on
9792 > > > the
9793 > > > >> channel.>>
9794 > > > >> >>"removes all bans preventing me from entering the channel",
9795 > > > this
9796 > > > >> is false. However it will hopefully be fixed in next release.
9797 > > > >> >>
9798 > > > >> >>Here's the Scenario:
9799 > > > >> >>
9800 > > > >> >>Rothgar is admin@netadmin.street-creed.com * DawG of DooM!
9801 > > > >> >>Rothgar is connecting from *@211.XX.XXX.XXX
9802 > > > >> >>
9803 > > > >> >>(02:34) * Rothgar sets mode: +b *!*@211.*
9804 > > > >> >>-=Ban Protection=- You have banned yourself from
9805 > > > >> Channel:#underdog Attempting to UnBan you...
9806 > > > >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9807 > > > >> >>(02:34) -ChanServ- You have been unbanned from #underdog.
9808 > > > >> >>(02:35) * Rothgar sets mode: -bb *!*@211.* *!*@street-
9809 > > > >> DFC019D.dip.t-dialin.net
9810 > > > >> >>-=Ban Protection=- Ban Protection Successful (*!*@211.* in
9811 > > > >> #underdog)>>
9812 > > > >> >>As you can see Chanserv did not in fact remove bans
9813 > > > preventing
9814 > > > >> me from entering the channel. Chanserv needs to lookup vhosts
9815 > > > as
9816 > > > >> well as actual addresses. This would include a BNC etc. If
9817 > > > someone
9818 > > > >> set a ban on a subnet like that and it included your address
9819 > > > >> >> you would be denied entry. No smart asses saying how
9820 > being a
9821 > > > >> netadmin I am not prevented ;)
9822 > > > >> >>
9823 > > > >> >>Regards,
9824 > > > >> >>
9825 > > > >> >>Jason Mainwaring
9826 > > > >> >>A+ Service Technician
9827 > > > >> >>Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
9828 > > > >> >>MCSA Messaging
9829 > > > >> >>Certified Novell Administrator
9830 > > > >> >>Phone: (02) 9419 4616
9831 > > > >> >>E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
9832 > > > >> >>
9833 > > > >> >>
9834 > > > >> >>----------------------------------------------------------
9835 > ----
9836 > > > ---
9837 > > > >> -
9838 > > > >> >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9839 > > > >> >
9840 > > > >> >-----------------------------------------------------------
9841 > ----
9842 > > > ---
9843 > > > >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9844 > > > >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9845 > > > >> >.
9846 > > > >>
9847 > > > >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
9848 > > > >>
9849 > > > >>
9850 > > > >>
9851 > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
9852 > ----
9853 > > > --
9854 > > > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9855 > > > >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9856 > > > >>
9857 > > > >
9858 > > > >
9859 > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------
9860 > ----
9861 > > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9862 > > > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9863 > > > >.
9864 > > >
9865 > > > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
9866 > > >
9867 > > >
9868 > > >
9869 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
9870 > ---
9871 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9872 > > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9873 > > >
9874 > >
9875 > >
9876 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
9877 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9878 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9879 >
9880 >
9881 >
9882 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9883 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9884 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9885 >
9886
9887
9888
9889 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Apr 23 08:54:52 2004
9890 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
9891 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9892 Subject: [IRCServices] Convincing someone to not use auspice
9893 Message-ID: <200404231554.i3NFsq131092@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
9894
9895 I'm currently trying to convince someone to not bother using auspice on their network, the reasons being it is no longer maintained, and is based on a very very very old version of ircservices which is full of bugs and holes (seems so old that it doesnt even use linked lists for a lot of its data structures, rather static arrays). It seems that this person is unwilling to listen to reason about why such old unmaintained (the keyword here) projects should not be used on a live net, can anyone else come up with any good reasons to sway him?
9896
9897 Thanks,
9898
9899 Brain
9900
9901
9902
9903 From irc at teknet.com.tr Fri Apr 23 19:28:52 2004
9904 From: irc at teknet.com.tr (Okan karasoy)
9905 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9906 Subject: [IRCServices] /ns list *ip probem
9907 Message-ID: <ebf2d47dfc41377f08df62d81d53d4a9@teknet.com.tr>
9908
9909 We are currently running Tr ircd 5.7 on our server. We have a problem with the /ns list command. We use ircservices-5.0.30 and when we use the /ns list command services crash and close. An example can be seen here.
9910
9911 -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: PANIC! buffer = :^^zZz^^ P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :list *@TeKLAN.B026B2E8291FAE.TR seklinde aradigimiz zaman
9912 -
9913 -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: Received SQUIT services.teklan.com.tr from services.teklan.com.tr (Services terminating: Segmentation fault)
9914 -
9915 -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: :Write error to services.teklan.com.tr, closing link
9916 -
9917 -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- services.teklan.com.tr was connected for 508 seconds. 171/860 sendK/recvK.
9918 -
9919
9920 What could be the reason(s) for this? Is there anyway of preventing this from happening?
9921
9922
9923
9924
9925
9926 irc.teklan.com.tr IRC Y?netim kadrosu
9927 http://irc.teklan.com.tr/teklan.html
9928 http://ircforum.teklan.net
9929
9930
9931
9932 From irc at teknet.com.tr Fri Apr 23 19:29:32 2004
9933 From: irc at teknet.com.tr (Okan karasoy)
9934 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9935 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug log in Log file
9936 Message-ID: <e4ac6feb6b2317c38162c375b5274698@teknet.com.tr>
9937
9938 When we start up the ircservices we get a bug log in the log file such as this below.
9939
9940 [Apr 24 01:57:46 2004] IRC Services 5.0.30 starting up
9941 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] unknown message from server (:irc.teklan.com.tr 451 :Kayytly de?ilsiniz)
9942 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 1
9943 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 2
9944 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 3
9945 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9946 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 4
9947 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9948 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9949 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9950 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9951 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9952 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9953 [Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
9954
9955 What could be the reason for this? Why does this happen?
9956
9957
9958
9959
9960 irc.teklan.com.tr IRC Y?netim kadrosu
9961 http://irc.teklan.com.tr/teklan.html
9962 http://ircforum.teklan.net
9963
9964
9965
9966 From Craig at chatspike.net Fri Apr 23 17:48:25 2004
9967 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
9968 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
9969 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug log in Log file
9970 Message-ID: <mailman.36.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
9971
9972 Is it possible to have more information on your machine? Linux distro, Compiler and version, etc :)
9973
9974 Thanks
9975
9976 /****************************************
9977 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9978 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
9979 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9980 ****************************************/
9981
9982
9983 /****************************************
9984 * From - Okan karasoy <irc@teknet.com.tr>
9985 * To - IRC Services General Mailing Lis <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
9986 * Sent - 2004-04-24 02:29:32
9987 * Subject - [IRCServices] Bug log in Log file
9988 ****************************************/
9989
9990 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
9991
9992 >When we start up the ircservices we get a bug log in the log file such as this below.
9993 >
9994 >[Apr 24 01:57:46 2004] IRC Services 5.0.30 starting up
9995 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] unknown message from server (:irc.teklan.com.tr 451 :Kayytly de?ilsiniz)
9996 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 1
9997 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 2
9998 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 3
9999 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10000 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] user: New maximum user count: 4
10001 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10002 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10003 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10004 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10005 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10006 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10007 >[Apr 24 01:57:48 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (20480) <= wlen (-81884)
10008 >
10009 >What could be the reason for this? Why does this happen?
10010 >
10011 >
10012 >
10013 >
10014 >irc.teklan.com.tr IRC Y?netim kadrosu
10015 > http://irc.teklan.com.tr/teklan.html
10016 > http://ircforum.teklan.net
10017 >
10018 >
10019 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10020 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10021 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10022 >.
10023
10024 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
10025
10026 From sofit at proshe.bg Sat Apr 24 01:19:10 2004
10027 From: sofit at proshe.bg (Stanislav Zahariev)
10028 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10029 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request - "Alias" of commands
10030 Message-ID: <121648728.20040424111910@proshe.bg>
10031
10032 Hello,
10033 I was wondering, is it possible (with the current code) for NickServ
10034 to make no difference between
10035
10036 /msg NickServ id <pass>
10037 /msg NickServ ide <pass>
10038 /msg NickServ iden <pass>
10039 /msg NickServ identify <pass>
10040
10041 i.e. the above commands to be all aliases of identify. And if there
10042 is an ambiguous command NickServ will just say "Ambiguous command".
10043
10044 --
10045 Best regards,
10046 Stanislav
10047
10048
10049
10050 From Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com Sat Apr 24 04:38:58 2004
10051 From: Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com (Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com)
10052 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10053 Subject: [IRCServices] UnrealIRCd, noctcp module, mode +D
10054 Message-ID: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB52@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
10055
10056 Hello
10057
10058 I install noctcp module on my server. This module can restrict CTCP
10059 ACTION on channels, on which +D mode is set.
10060 When I try to lock this module, ChanServ says: [17:36:32] -ChanServ-
10061 Unknown mode character D ignored.
10062
10063
10064 ---
10065 Wbr, Alexander Zverev
10066
10067
10068 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Apr 24 20:54:25 2004
10069 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10070 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10071 Subject: [IRCServices] UnrealIRCd, noctcp module, mode +D
10072 In-Reply-To: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB52@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
10073 Message-ID: <408a5581.17152@achurch.org>
10074
10075 Modes added by third-party modules are not supported.
10076
10077 --Andrew Church
10078 achurch@achurch.org
10079 http://achurch.org/
10080
10081 >Hello
10082 >
10083 >I install noctcp module on my server. This module can restrict CTCP
10084 >ACTION on channels, on which +D mode is set.
10085 >When I try to lock this module, ChanServ says: [17:36:32] -ChanServ-
10086 >Unknown mode character D ignored.
10087 >
10088 >
10089 >---
10090 >Wbr, Alexander Zverev
10091 >
10092 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10093 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10094 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10095
10096
10097 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Apr 24 04:57:57 2004
10098 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
10099 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10100 Subject: [IRCServices] UnrealIRCd, noctcp module, mode +D
10101 Message-ID: <200404241157.i3OBvw114759@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
10102
10103 this is because services is unaware of the changes made to your ircd by loading the module. To make this work you'd probably have to hack around inside unreal.c (the protocol module in services). Note however that doing so would invalidate any support offered here as modified distributions are not supported for obvious reasons.
10104
10105 >Hello
10106 >
10107 >I install noctcp module on my server. This module can restrict CTCP
10108 >ACTION on channels, on which +D mode is set.
10109 >When I try to lock this module, ChanServ says: [17:36:32] -ChanServ-
10110 >Unknown mode character D ignored.
10111 >
10112 >
10113 >---
10114 >Wbr, Alexander Zverev
10115 >
10116 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10117 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10118 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10119
10120
10121
10122 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Apr 24 05:03:36 2004
10123 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
10124 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10125 Subject: [IRCServices] Releasing a protocol module
10126 Message-ID: <200404241203.i3OC3a114848@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
10127
10128 Hi,
10129
10130 Recently ive been developing a protocol module for my ircd (www.inspircd.org) which is nearing completion. Is there any way i could get the protocol module bundled with the others in the ircservices package when it is complete? It will of course need some tidying up, and im sure Andy will want to make some tweaks so it fits in with his coding style. Due to the nature of my ircd ive had to put some weird/ugly hacks into the protocol module such as capturing builtins such as privmsg as 'extra' commands (this has to be done because the format of the commands is totally different to any other ircd) - but it appears to work fine so far.
10131
10132 Any more information on this?
10133
10134 Thanks lots,
10135 Brain
10136
10137
10138
10139 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Sat Apr 24 06:43:00 2004
10140 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
10141 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10142 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ enforcing.
10143 Message-ID: <5c46255c7662.5c76625c4625@shaw.ca>
10144
10145 I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My reasons being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user makes a passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed. If you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock" modes which include the password yet the user is still in the channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the like)?
10146
10147 Regards,
10148
10149 Jason Mainwaring
10150 A+ Service Technician
10151 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10152 MCSA Messaging
10153 Certified Novell Administrator
10154 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10155 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10156
10157
10158
10159 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Apr 24 07:00:11 2004
10160 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
10161 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10162 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ
10163 enforcing.
10164 Message-ID: <200404241400.i3OE0B118995@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
10165
10166 Andy wont support this if you compile it, as its 3rd-party, but...
10167
10168 if you get the idleserv module from here, http://www.chatspike.net/modules/ - then it can be used to hold channels open while there are no users in it, the way you want.
10169
10170 >I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My reasons being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user makes a passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed. If you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock" modes which include the password yet the user is still in the channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the like)?
10171 >
10172 >Regards,
10173 >
10174 >Jason Mainwaring
10175 >A+ Service Technician
10176 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10177 >MCSA Messaging
10178 >Certified Novell Administrator
10179 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10180 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10181 >
10182 >
10183 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10184 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10185 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10186
10187
10188
10189 From mark at phedny.net Sat Apr 24 06:58:57 2004
10190 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
10191 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10192 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ
10193 enforcing.
10194 In-Reply-To: <5c46255c7662.5c76625c4625@shaw.ca>
10195 References: <5c46255c7662.5c76625c4625@shaw.ca>
10196 Message-ID: <408A72A1.20309@phedny.net>
10197
10198 JASON M wrote:
10199
10200 >I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My reasons being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user makes a passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed. If you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock" modes which include the password yet the user is still in the channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the like)?
10201 >
10202 >Regards,
10203 >
10204 >Jason Mainwaring
10205 >A+ Service Technician
10206 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10207 >MCSA Messaging
10208 >Certified Novell Administrator
10209 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10210 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10211 >
10212 >
10213 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10214 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10215 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10216 >
10217 >
10218 >
10219
10220
10221
10222 From mark at phedny.net Sat Apr 24 07:00:50 2004
10223 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
10224 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10225 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ
10226 enforcing.
10227 In-Reply-To: <5c46255c7662.5c76625c4625@shaw.ca>
10228 References: <5c46255c7662.5c76625c4625@shaw.ca>
10229 Message-ID: <408A7312.1060006@phedny.net>
10230
10231 Hi,
10232
10233 I think the best way to do this is place someone in the channel. Afaik
10234 the Services can't do this, but you might be able to create a small bot
10235 that can join channels when people ask it to. Just so anyone is inside
10236 the channel.
10237
10238 JASON M wrote:
10239
10240 >I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My reasons being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user makes a passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed. If you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock" modes which include the password yet the user is still in the channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the like)?
10241 >
10242 >Regards,
10243 >
10244 >Jason Mainwaring
10245 >A+ Service Technician
10246 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10247 >MCSA Messaging
10248 >Certified Novell Administrator
10249 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10250 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10251 >
10252 >
10253 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10254 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10255 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10256 >
10257 >
10258 >
10259
10260
10261
10262 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Sat Apr 24 20:08:16 2004
10263 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
10264 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10265 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with
10266 ChanServ enforcing.
10267 Message-ID: <62790162c5bb.62c5bb627901@shaw.ca>
10268
10269 Hmm, I assume with your IdleServ module, the bot will be called just that... IdleServ. I am really looking for a module to SVSJOIN ChanServ to all registered channels or a built in feature to make ChanServ stay in the channels. A lot of our users barely know who ChanServ is let alone IdleServ heh. Plus as you said it's not supported. Any word on this Andy?
10270
10271 Regards,
10272
10273 Jason Mainwaring
10274 A+ Service Technician
10275 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10276 MCSA Messaging
10277 Certified Novell Administrator
10278 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10279 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10280
10281 ----- Original Message -----
10282 From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
10283 Date: Saturday, April 24, 2004 7:00 am
10284 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ enforcing.
10285
10286 > Andy wont support this if you compile it, as its 3rd-party, but...
10287 >
10288 > if you get the idleserv module from here,
10289 > http://www.chatspike.net/modules/ - then it can be used to hold
10290 > channels open while there are no users in it, the way you want.
10291 >
10292 > >I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the
10293 > channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am
10294 > wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My reasons
10295 > being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user makes a
10296 > passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed. If
10297 > you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock"
10298 > modes which include the password yet the user is still in the
10299 > channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this
10300 > just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay
10301 > protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the like)?
10302 > >
10303 > >Regards,
10304 > >
10305 > >Jason Mainwaring
10306 > >A+ Service Technician
10307 > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10308 > >MCSA Messaging
10309 > >Certified Novell Administrator
10310 > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10311 > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10312 > >
10313 > >
10314 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
10315 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10316 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10317 >
10318 >
10319 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10320 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10321 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10322 >
10323
10324
10325
10326 From derfy at derfy.net Sat Apr 24 21:24:11 2004
10327 From: derfy at derfy.net (Freddie Agricola)
10328 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10329 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with
10330 ChanServ enforcing.
10331 In-Reply-To: <62790162c5bb.62c5bb627901@shaw.ca>
10332 References: <62790162c5bb.62c5bb627901@shaw.ca>
10333 Message-ID: <49fm809btsbgs7a3hevq483hglbal33v55@4ax.com>
10334
10335 On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:08:16 -0700, you wrote:
10336
10337 >Hmm, I assume with your IdleServ module, the bot will be called just that... IdleServ. I am really looking for a module to SVSJOIN ChanServ to all registered channels or a built in feature to make ChanServ stay in the channels. A lot of our users barely know who ChanServ is let alone IdleServ heh. Plus as you said it's not supported. Any word on this Andy?
10338 >
10339 >Regards,
10340 >
10341 >Jason Mainwaring
10342
10343 >
10344 Andy's word is here:
10345 http://www.ircservices.za.net/docs/faq.html#Z6.5
10346
10347
10348
10349
10350 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Apr 25 14:39:16 2004
10351 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10352 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10353 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with
10354 ChanServ enforcing.
10355 In-Reply-To: <62790162c5bb.62c5bb627901@shaw.ca>
10356 Message-ID: <408b4f30.20436@achurch.org>
10357
10358 RTFM. (FAQ Z.6)
10359
10360 --Andrew Church
10361 achurch@achurch.org
10362 http://achurch.org/
10363
10364 >Hmm, I assume with your IdleServ module, the bot will be called just that... IdleServ. I am really looking for a module to SVSJOIN ChanServ to all registered channels or a built in feature to make ChanServ stay in the channels. A lot of our users barely k
10365 >now who ChanServ is let alone IdleServ heh. Plus as you said it's not supported. Any word on this Andy?
10366 >
10367 >Regards,
10368 >
10369 >Jason Mainwaring
10370 >A+ Service Technician
10371 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10372 >MCSA Messaging
10373 >Certified Novell Administrator
10374 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10375 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10376 >
10377 >----- Original Message -----
10378 >From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
10379 >Date: Saturday, April 24, 2004 7:00 am
10380 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ enforcing.
10381 >
10382 >> Andy wont support this if you compile it, as its 3rd-party, but...
10383 >>
10384 >> if you get the idleserv module from here,
10385 >> http://www.chatspike.net/modules/ - then it can be used to hold
10386 >> channels open while there are no users in it, the way you want.
10387 >>
10388 >> >I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the
10389 >> channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am
10390 >> wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My reasons
10391 >> being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user makes a
10392 >> passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed. If
10393 >> you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock"
10394 >> modes which include the password yet the user is still in the
10395 >> channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this
10396 >> just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay
10397 >> protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the like)?
10398 >> >
10399 >> >Regards,
10400 >> >
10401 >> >Jason Mainwaring
10402 >> >A+ Service Technician
10403 >> >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10404 >> >MCSA Messaging
10405 >> >Certified Novell Administrator
10406 >> >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10407 >> >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10408 >> >
10409 >> >
10410 >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
10411 >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10412 >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10413 >>
10414 >>
10415 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
10416 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10417 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10418 >>
10419 >
10420 >
10421 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10422 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10423
10424
10425 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sun Apr 25 05:16:10 2004
10426 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
10427 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10428 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels
10429 withChanServ enforcing.
10430 Message-ID: <200404251216.i3PCGB109906@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
10431
10432 Its perfectly possible to get idleserv to be chanserv (if you know what i mean) simply by exporting one symbol s_ChanServ from chanserv.c (maybe this is more suited to the services coding list). If you want to try this, again youre on your own but ive found modifying ircservices to be great fun, and you might enjoy it. Im guessing it would be a 10 minute job to do.
10433
10434 >Hmm, I assume with your IdleServ module, the bot will be called just that... IdleServ. I am really looking for a module to SVSJOIN ChanServ to all registered channels or a built in feature to make ChanServ stay in the channels. A lot of our users barely know who ChanServ is let alone IdleServ heh. Plus as you said it's not supported. Any word on this Andy?
10435 >
10436 >Regards,
10437 >
10438 >Jason Mainwaring
10439 >A+ Service Technician
10440 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10441 >MCSA Messaging
10442 >Certified Novell Administrator
10443 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10444 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10445 >
10446 >----- Original Message -----
10447 >From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
10448 >Date: Saturday, April 24, 2004 7:00 am
10449 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ enforcing.
10450 >
10451 >> Andy wont support this if you compile it, as its 3rd-party, but...
10452 >>
10453 >> if you get the idleserv module from here,
10454 >> http://www.chatspike.net/modules/ - then it can be used to hold
10455 >> channels open while there are no users in it, the way you want.
10456 >>
10457 >> >I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the
10458 >> channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am
10459 >> wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My reasons
10460 >> being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user makes a
10461 >> passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed. If
10462 >> you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock"
10463 >> modes which include the password yet the user is still in the
10464 >> channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this
10465 >> just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay
10466 >> protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the like)?
10467 >> >
10468 >> >Regards,
10469 >> >
10470 >> >Jason Mainwaring
10471 >> >A+ Service Technician
10472 >> >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10473 >> >MCSA Messaging
10474 >> >Certified Novell Administrator
10475 >> >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10476 >> >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10477 >> >
10478 >> >
10479 >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
10480 >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10481 >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10482 >>
10483 >>
10484 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
10485 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10486 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10487 >>
10488 >
10489 >
10490 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10491 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10492 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10493
10494
10495
10496 From Craig at chatspike.net Sun Apr 25 06:45:08 2004
10497 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
10498 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10499 Subject: [IRCServices] XML Loaded without HTTPd?
10500 Message-ID: <mailman.37.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
10501
10502 I think this is a bug, but i'm gonna query it first, for months now (without really realising it) we have had the XML modules loaded in our copy of services, however, we have done so without the httpd modules loaded. As far as i know, the XML modules depend on http for their output, so, Shouldnt the XML modules check to see if the HTTP modules are running before being allowed to function?
10503 Especially seeing afaik, there is no other way to use the XML modules.
10504
10505 /****************************************
10506 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
10507 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
10508 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
10509 ****************************************/
10510
10511
10512
10513 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Apr 25 23:04:16 2004
10514 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10515 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10516 Subject: [IRCServices] XML Loaded without HTTPd?
10517 In-Reply-To: <408bc127.02753@mail.achurch.org>
10518 Message-ID: <408bc598.21136@achurch.org>
10519
10520 XML I/O can be used from the command line (in fact, importing can only
10521 be done from the command line).
10522
10523 --Andrew Church
10524 achurch@achurch.org
10525 http://achurch.org/
10526
10527 >I think this is a bug, but i'm gonna query it first, for months now (without really realising it) we have had the XML modules loaded in our copy of services, however, we have done so without the httpd modules loaded. As far as i know, the XML modules depe
10528 >nd on http for their output, so, Shouldnt the XML modules check to see if the HTTP modules are running before being allowed to function?
10529 >Especially seeing afaik, there is no other way to use the XML modules.
10530 >
10531 >/****************************************
10532 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
10533 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
10534 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
10535 > ****************************************/
10536 >
10537 >
10538 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10539 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10540
10541
10542 From medice at gmx.at Sun Apr 25 08:14:06 2004
10543 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
10544 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10545 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ
10546 enforcing.
10547 In-Reply-To: <5c46255c7662.5c76625c4625@shaw.ca>
10548 References: <5c46255c7662.5c76625c4625@shaw.ca>
10549 Message-ID: <408BD5BE.40200@gmx.at>
10550
10551 I always thought it is more reasonable to solve this problem ircd-sided,
10552 which might be possible with a chanmode +r for registered channels only
10553 setable by services (I don't know all the ircd out there and am not
10554 aware if ALL have this or a similar mode implemented...).
10555 In case +r is set (which means the channel is registered by chanserv)
10556 this channel should not "expire" on ircd - it should keep all modes -
10557 including bans and +k keywords and so on - even if there are 0 user in.
10558 So there are existing empty channels, just as my home has all its
10559 tables, chairs and pencils even if I'm out ;)
10560 But the ircd-coders I sent this idea dislike :(
10561
10562 Meanwhile you should prefer a workaround - as suggested here on ML or in
10563 FAQ using modules or bots.
10564
10565 greetz
10566 /medice
10567
10568 P.S. i hope, nobody is disturbed, although this post is not really
10569 ircservices-related...
10570
10571
10572
10573
10574
10575 From irc at teknet.com.tr Sun Apr 25 11:46:07 2004
10576 From: irc at teknet.com.tr (irc.teklan.com.tr)
10577 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10578 Subject: [IRCServices] services terminating with mlock command ?
10579 Message-ID: <c1eab1d58d360de54e373f50d4f0738d@teknet.com.tr>
10580
10581 Hi,
10582 We are using tr-ircd(magnificat)-5.7(00)-rc2#16 on our server and ircservices-5.0.30. We have a problem with services. When a user uses the mlock command with the +J mode, services terminate. The command used was /cs set #chan mlock +J 5 and we are given this quit message:
10583
10584 [16:25:00] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: PANIC! buffer = :SenSei P ChanServ@services.teklan.com.tr :set #opers mlock +tnJ 5
10585 -
10586 [16:25:00] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: Received SQUIT services.teklan.com.tr from services.teklan.com.tr (Services terminating: Segmentation fault)
10587 -
10588 [16:25:00] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: :Write error to services.teklan.com.tr, closing link
10589 -
10590 [16:25:00] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- services.teklan.com.tr was connected for 404 seconds. 364/1847 sendK/recvK.
10591
10592 What could be the reason for this, and how can we prevent it?
10593
10594
10595
10596 irc.teklan.com.tr IRC Y?netim kadrosu
10597 http://irc.teklan.com.tr/teklan.html
10598 http://ircforum.teklan.net
10599
10600
10601
10602 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Sun Apr 25 09:44:03 2004
10603 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
10604 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10605 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ
10606 enforcing.
10607 Message-ID: <20040425164403.69403.qmail@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
10608
10609 Hello.. I think this is a solution... services must
10610 check if the user know the channel key. So if someone
10611 is the *first* user who wants to join a channel with
10612 mlock +k he must type a command first like this: /cs
10613 keyjoin #chan channel key ... If someone try to join a
10614 channel without typing this command CΗΑΝSΕRV will
10615 kick and ban him.. And if someone trys to use this
10616 command more than 3 times with wronk channel key
10617 services will kill him. I want reply from the members
10618 for this;-p
10619
10620 =====
10621 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
10622
10623
10624
10625 From Craig at chatspike.net Sun Apr 25 13:26:02 2004
10626 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
10627 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10628 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServenforcing.
10629 Message-ID: <mailman.38.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
10630
10631 A more reasonable idea would be to kick ban the first person to join the channel if empty, Chanserv will sit in there for a small ammount of time (as it would with normal kicks), then set the channel key before unbanning the user. That user would then be able to join the channel properly.
10632
10633 Although i might add, i suggested something like this previously, and it was chucked out at the first hurdle, with a message saying 'Use Secure access lists'. Which i'm guessing will be the same responce here.
10634
10635 /****************************************
10636 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
10637 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
10638 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
10639 ****************************************/
10640
10641
10642 /****************************************
10643 * From - Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
10644 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
10645 * Sent - 2004-04-25 17:44:03
10646 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServenforcing.
10647 ****************************************/
10648
10649 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
10650
10651 >Hello.. I think this is a solution... services must
10652 >check if the user know the channel key. So if someone
10653 >is the *first* user who wants to join a channel with
10654 >mlock +k he must type a command first like this: /cs
10655 >keyjoin #chan channel key ... If someone try to join a
10656 >channel without typing this command C??????S??RV will
10657 >kick and ban him.. And if someone trys to use this
10658 >command more than 3 times with wronk channel key
10659 >services will kill him. I want reply from the members
10660 >for this;-p
10661 >
10662 >=====
10663 >Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
10664 >
10665 >
10666 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10667 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10668 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10669 >.
10670
10671 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
10672
10673 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Mon Apr 26 09:25:40 2004
10674 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
10675 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10676 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels
10677 with ChanServ enforcing.
10678 Message-ID: <715c42718e2a.718e2a715c42@shaw.ca>
10679
10680 "An option to make ChanServ stay in some/all registered channels: I see absolutely no necessity for this feature, since (1) Services' channel privilege and information functions will operate whether or not ChanServ (or any users at all) are in the channel, and (2) if someone really wants to keep a channel open for some reason, they can use an ordinary bot. Furthermore, having ChanServ stay in channels will dramatically increase the amount of traffic Services has to handle, which will in turn reduce the rate at which Services can respond to requests. (This has also been discussed to death on the mailing list, so please don't ask for it to be reconsidered.)"
10681
10682 I have only a few things to add. The privelidge system doesn't necessarily work if you can't lock a channel correctly? Sure you could get an eggdrop... Yet they won't be services and I honestly don't see why a feature like this couldn't be added. Defaultly Off, with the ability to turn on? It can't slow down Services too greatly as a server such as GamSurge A.K.A. GamesNet who uses SRVX has ChanServ in their 30,000+ Channels with obviously more users than that. They seem to respond perfectly fine 90-95% of the time. Perhaps SRVX has developed a good method? They mustn't ignore channel text as srvx has channel triggers?
10683
10684 I would not be so against this, if the passwording of a channel actually worked... Would there be a method you could create instead perhaps like a "set chanpass" option. I am unsure of how IRCd and Services interact, yet perhaps on receiving a join command set the pass before the user joins or check the password param from the user against the chanpass setting? Once again I am not sure how they interact :) I just use them. A Services solution to passwording channels would be nice though.
10685
10686 I agree I could have read the FAQ, It didn't cross my mind, so thats quite a legit response.
10687
10688 Regards,
10689
10690 Jason Mainwaring
10691 A+ Service Technician
10692 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10693 MCSA Messaging
10694 Certified Novell Administrator
10695 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10696 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10697
10698 ----- Original Message -----
10699 From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10700 Date: Saturday, April 24, 2004 10:39 pm
10701 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ enforcing.
10702
10703 > RTFM. (FAQ Z.6)
10704 >
10705 > --Andrew Church
10706 > achurch@achurch.org
10707 > http://achurch.org/
10708 >
10709 > >Hmm, I assume with your IdleServ module, the bot will be called
10710 > just that... IdleServ. I am really looking for a module to SVSJOIN
10711 > ChanServ to all registered channels or a built in feature to make
10712 > ChanServ stay in the channels. A lot of our users barely k
10713 > >now who ChanServ is let alone IdleServ heh. Plus as you said it's
10714 > not supported. Any word on this Andy?
10715 > >
10716 > >Regards,
10717 > >
10718 > >Jason Mainwaring
10719 > >A+ Service Technician
10720 > >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10721 > >MCSA Messaging
10722 > >Certified Novell Administrator
10723 > >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10724 > >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10725 > >
10726 > >----- Original Message -----
10727 > >From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
10728 > >Date: Saturday, April 24, 2004 7:00 am
10729 > >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with
10730 > ChanServ enforcing.>
10731 > >> Andy wont support this if you compile it, as its 3rd-party, but...
10732 > >>
10733 > >> if you get the idleserv module from here,
10734 > >> http://www.chatspike.net/modules/ - then it can be used to hold
10735 > >> channels open while there are no users in it, the way you want.
10736 > >>
10737 > >> >I'm not sure if IRC Services' ChanServ ever did stay in the
10738 > >> channel, we have jumped around a bit over the years. I am
10739 > >> wondering however if it is possible to add this in... My
10740 > reasons
10741 > >> being users wanting to make passworded channels. If a user
10742 > makes a
10743 > >> passworded channel and everyone leaves, all modes are removed.
10744 > If
10745 > >> you mlock +k yourpassword, upon entry it will set the "mlock"
10746 > >> modes which include the password yet the user is still in the
10747 > >> channel and now has the password visualy on the screen. Is this
10748 > >> just with Unreal? How would one make a passworded channel, stay
10749 > >> protected upon all people leaving (ruling out an eggdrop or the
10750 > like)?>> >
10751 > >> >Regards,
10752 > >> >
10753 > >> >Jason Mainwaring
10754 > >> >A+ Service Technician
10755 > >> >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10756 > >> >MCSA Messaging
10757 > >> >Certified Novell Administrator
10758 > >> >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10759 > >> >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10760 > >> >
10761 > >> >
10762 > >> >---------------------------------------------------------------
10763 > ---
10764 > >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10765 > >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10766 > >>
10767 > >>
10768 > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
10769 > --
10770 > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10771 > >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10772 > >>
10773 > >
10774 > >
10775 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
10776 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10777 >
10778 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10779 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10780 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10781 >
10782
10783
10784
10785 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Mon Apr 26 09:33:35 2004
10786 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
10787 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10788 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with
10789 ChanServ enforcing.
10790 Message-ID: <719756717c60.717c60719756@shaw.ca>
10791
10792 Thats kind of what I was thinking... opposed to "/msg chanserv pass chan" however which I don't believe will work, which is why people can join around this. on use typing "/join #channel" if this gets sent to the ircd, which sends to Services? This could be intercepted? as "/join #channel password" is a valid parameter for joining a passworded channel, it could then match is with a password you set in Chanserv set options. Another method could be ChanServ idling a channel while no-one is in it? On second person joining leave? When there is one user left, join? This would keep modes active without the "extra load" as it was put on ChanServ.
10793
10794 Regards,
10795
10796 Jason Mainwaring
10797 A+ Service Technician
10798 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10799 MCSA Messaging
10800 Certified Novell Administrator
10801 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10802 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10803
10804 ----- Original Message -----
10805 From: "Dionisios K." <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
10806 Date: Sunday, April 25, 2004 9:44 am
10807 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ enforcing.
10808
10809 > Hello.. I think this is a solution... services must
10810 > check if the user know the channel key. So if someone
10811 > is the *first* user who wants to join a channel with
10812 > mlock +k he must type a command first like this: /cs
10813 > keyjoin #chan channel key ... If someone try to join a
10814 > channel without typing this command C??????S??RV will
10815 > kick and ban him.. And if someone trys to use this
10816 > command more than 3 times with wronk channel key
10817 > services will kill him. I want reply from the members
10818 > for this;-p
10819 >
10820 > =====
10821 > Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
10822 >
10823 >
10824 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10825 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10826 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10827 >
10828
10829
10830
10831 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Mon Apr 26 09:38:12 2004
10832 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
10833 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10834 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServenforcing.
10835 Message-ID: <71bed471b698.71b69871bed4@shaw.ca>
10836
10837 The problem I see with your idea there is the whole banning users for an ammount of time in which the user would then have to wait or unban themselves to join. Pain in the ass if you ask me. Use secure access, this was an option I was considering before posting however back to the whole pain in the ass aspect. People often can't auth as fast as they join. So if they aren't authed simple, no access to channel. They then have to manually re-join the channel. If there was a solution to passwording the channel where it wouldn't inconvenience the user by kickbanning them, or requiring them to auth it would be great.
10838
10839 Regards,
10840
10841 Jason Mainwaring
10842 A+ Service Technician
10843 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10844 MCSA Messaging
10845 Certified Novell Administrator
10846 Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10847 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10848
10849 ----- Original Message -----
10850 From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
10851 Date: Sunday, April 25, 2004 1:26 pm
10852 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServenforcing.
10853
10854 > A more reasonable idea would be to kick ban the first person to
10855 > join the channel if empty, Chanserv will sit in there for a small
10856 > ammount of time (as it would with normal kicks), then set the
10857 > channel key before unbanning the user. That user would then be
10858 > able to join the channel properly.
10859 >
10860 > Although i might add, i suggested something like this previously,
10861 > and it was chucked out at the first hurdle, with a message saying
10862 > 'Use Secure access lists'. Which i'm guessing will be the same
10863 > responce here.
10864 >
10865 > /****************************************
10866 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
10867 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
10868 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
10869 > ****************************************/
10870 >
10871 >
10872 > /****************************************
10873 > * From - Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
10874 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net
10875 > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net> * Sent - 2004-04-25 17:44:03
10876 > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with
10877 > ChanServenforcing. ****************************************/
10878 >
10879 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
10880 >
10881 > >Hello.. I think this is a solution... services must
10882 > >check if the user know the channel key. So if someone
10883 > >is the *first* user who wants to join a channel with
10884 > >mlock +k he must type a command first like this: /cs
10885 > >keyjoin #chan channel key ... If someone try to join a
10886 > >channel without typing this command C??????S??RV will
10887 > >kick and ban him.. And if someone trys to use this
10888 > >command more than 3 times with wronk channel key
10889 > >services will kill him. I want reply from the members
10890 > >for this;-p
10891 > >
10892 > >=====
10893 > >Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
10894 > >
10895 > >
10896 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
10897 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10898 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10899 > >.
10900 >
10901 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
10902 >
10903 >
10904 -------------- next part --------------
10905 ------------------------------------------------------------------
10906 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10907 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10908 From mark at phedny.net Mon Apr 26 09:57:42 2004
10909 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
10910 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10911 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServenforcing.
10912 In-Reply-To: <71bed471b698.71b69871bed4@shaw.ca>
10913 References: <71bed471b698.71b69871bed4@shaw.ca>
10914 Message-ID: <408D3F86.5080301@phedny.net>
10915
10916 Hi,
10917
10918 What is the difference between specifying a channel key (+k) on join and
10919 specifying a password with NickServ. By using the ChanServ access list
10920 you accomplish the same. In most IRC clients there is some way of
10921 specifying a login-command (login-cmd, perform buffer, etc), where you
10922 can place the NickServ IDENTIFY command.
10923
10924 - Mark
10925
10926 JASON M wrote:
10927
10928 >The problem I see with your idea there is the whole banning users for an ammount of time in which the user would then have to wait or unban themselves to join. Pain in the ass if you ask me. Use secure access, this was an option I was considering before posting however back to the whole pain in the ass aspect. People often can't auth as fast as they join. So if they aren't authed simple, no access to channel. They then have to manually re-join the channel. If there was a solution to passwording the channel where it wouldn't inconvenience the user by kickbanning them, or requiring them to auth it would be great.
10929 >
10930 >Regards,
10931 >
10932 >Jason Mainwaring
10933 >A+ Service Technician
10934 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10935 >MCSA Messaging
10936 >Certified Novell Administrator
10937 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10938 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10939 >
10940 >----- Original Message -----
10941 >From: Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
10942 >Date: Sunday, April 25, 2004 1:26 pm
10943 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServenforcing.
10944 >
10945 >
10946
10947
10948
10949 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Apr 26 10:07:17 2004
10950 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
10951 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
10952 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels
10953 withChanServ enforcing.
10954 Message-ID: <mailman.39.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
10955
10956 Services will recieve the Join _AFTER_ the IRCd has created the channel, so there is no way to intercept it.
10957
10958 The problem with this, is that the chance are, the channels will be forced to be left open on the IRCd, Which could cause performance issues (potentially thousands of empty channels being held open by chanserv)
10959
10960 Re: Your other mail
10961 Nickserv has an ajoin command, maybe you could encourage users to use it?
10962
10963 /****************************************
10964 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
10965 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
10966 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
10967 ****************************************/
10968
10969
10970 /****************************************
10971 * From - JASON M <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
10972 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
10973 * Sent - 2004-04-26 17:33:35
10974 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
10975 ****************************************/
10976
10977 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
10978
10979 >Thats kind of what I was thinking... opposed to "/msg chanserv pass chan" however which I don't believe will work, which is why people can join around this. on use typing "/join #channel" if this gets sent to the ircd, which sends to Services? This could be intercepted? as "/join #channel password" is a valid parameter for joining a passworded channel, it could then match is with a password you set in Chanserv set options. Another method could be ChanServ idling a channel while no-one is in it? On second person joining leave? When there is one user left, join? This would keep modes active without the "extra load" as it was put on ChanServ.
10980 >
10981 >Regards,
10982 >
10983 >Jason Mainwaring
10984 >A+ Service Technician
10985 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
10986 >MCSA Messaging
10987 >Certified Novell Administrator
10988 >Phone: (02) 9419 4616
10989 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
10990 >
10991 >----- Original Message -----
10992 >From: "Dionisios K." <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
10993 >Date: Sunday, April 25, 2004 9:44 am
10994 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels with ChanServ enforcing.
10995 >
10996 >> Hello.. I think this is a solution... services must
10997 >> check if the user know the channel key. So if someone
10998 >> is the *first* user who wants to join a channel with
10999 >> mlock +k he must type a command first like this: /cs
11000 >> keyjoin #chan channel key ... If someone try to join a
11001 >> channel without typing this command C??????S??RV will
11002 >> kick and ban him.. And if someone trys to use this
11003 >> command more than 3 times with wronk channel key
11004 >> services will kill him. I want reply from the members
11005 >> for this;-p
11006 >>
11007 >> =====
11008 >> Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11009 >>
11010 >>
11011 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
11012 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11013 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11014 >>
11015 >
11016 >
11017 >------------------------------------------------------------------
11018 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11019 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11020 >.
11021
11022 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
11023
11024 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Mon Apr 26 10:46:58 2004
11025 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11026 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11027 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11028 Message-ID: <20040426174658.8964.qmail@web86401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11029
11030 Open channels? Idleserv? My idea is very more simple.
11031 Just add a command to services to check if the first
11032 user who join a +k mlocked channel knows the key. /cs
11033 chankey #chan - and yes why not kickban a user who try
11034 to join to a channel and he dont know the key.
11035
11036 =====
11037 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11038
11039
11040
11041 From thema at adnd.com Mon Apr 26 12:23:31 2004
11042 From: thema at adnd.com (thema@adnd.com)
11043 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11044 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11045 In-Reply-To: <20040426174658.8964.qmail@web86401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11046 Message-ID: <000e01c42bc3$f5c43470$3d714fd9@thema>
11047
11048 Quite honestly I've been watching this argument fly around the mailing list
11049 for so long now that I personally am sick of it.
11050
11051 Andy, I know you think you have valid reasons for not implementing this
11052 choice, but even I, with my limited intelligence can see that you're
11053 flogging a dead horse. Why not give people what they want?
11054 I don't think it can be considered as a failure to admit that maybe the
11055 masses might have a point, small as it might be. We all, and I include
11056 myself in that all, want the choice. Dammit man if it slows down services
11057 then we're forewarned already. It's no biggie. We'll handle it. Stop saying
11058 "No!" just because you think you know better then we do. I admit it. You
11059 know wayyy more then I do, but I need this facility, and so do so many
11060 others. Be kind to us, and please let us have the choice.
11061
11062 Thema (AKA Olly webmaster and Admin www.adnd.com)
11063
11064 -----Original Message-----
11065 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
11066 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net]On Behalf Of Dionisios K.
11067 Sent: 26 April 2004 18:47
11068 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
11069 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ
11070 enforcing.
11071
11072
11073 Open channels? Idleserv? My idea is very more simple.
11074 Just add a command to services to check if the first
11075 user who join a +k mlocked channel knows the key. /cs
11076 chankey #chan - and yes why not kickban a user who try
11077 to join to a channel and he dont know the key.
11078
11079 =====
11080 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11081
11082
11083 ------------------------------------------------------------------
11084 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11085 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11086
11087 ---
11088 Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
11089 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
11090 Version: 6.0.667 / Virus Database: 429 - Release Date: 23/04/2004
11091
11092 ---
11093 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
11094 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
11095 Version: 6.0.667 / Virus Database: 429 - Release Date: 23/04/2004
11096
11097
11098
11099
11100 From admin at nevernet.net Mon Apr 26 12:29:02 2004
11101 From: admin at nevernet.net (Elijah)
11102 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11103 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11104 In-Reply-To: <000e01c42bc3$f5c43470$3d714fd9@thema>
11105 Message-ID: <mailman.40.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
11106
11107 It comes down to Andy having to write the code for this. Making demands is no
11108 way to get someone to do something when he's doing it for free. If you don't
11109 like ircservices because it doesn't have the feature you want, there are plenty
11110 of other services versions out there. There is no need to be disrespectful or
11111 unappreciative of Andy's work on this project. It's his project, it's his
11112 vision. If he says "NO!" a thousand times, that's his prerogative. If you don't
11113 like his answer, go buy "C For Dummies" and write your own services.
11114
11115 > Be kind to us, and please let us have the choice.
11116
11117 You have the choice. Make it.
11118
11119 Elijah
11120
11121 -----Original Message-----
11122 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
11123 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of thema@adnd.com
11124 Sent: Monday, 26 April, 2004 2:24 PM
11125 To: 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
11126 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11127
11128 Quite honestly I've been watching this argument fly around the mailing list
11129 for so long now that I personally am sick of it.
11130
11131 Andy, I know you think you have valid reasons for not implementing this
11132 choice, but even I, with my limited intelligence can see that you're
11133 flogging a dead horse. Why not give people what they want?
11134 I don't think it can be considered as a failure to admit that maybe the
11135 masses might have a point, small as it might be. We all, and I include
11136 myself in that all, want the choice. Dammit man if it slows down services
11137 then we're forewarned already. It's no biggie. We'll handle it. Stop saying
11138 "No!" just because you think you know better then we do. I admit it. You
11139 know wayyy more then I do, but I need this facility, and so do so many
11140 others. Be kind to us, and please let us have the choice.
11141
11142 Thema (AKA Olly webmaster and Admin www.adnd.com)
11143
11144
11145
11146
11147
11148 From mike at chat.za.net Mon Apr 26 12:58:24 2004
11149 From: mike at chat.za.net (Michael Smith)
11150 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11151 Subject: [IRCServices] bahamut-1.4.35 or .36
11152 Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.0.20040426215335.03e07550@196.14.3.98>
11153
11154 Hi Guys,
11155
11156 I have been running bahamut 1.4.35 with ircservices 5.0.x since Last year
11157 November on a fairly large network with no problems, except for the szline
11158 issues.......its actually been rock solid
11159
11160 I _KNOW_ according to the documentation that bahamut up to 1.4.34 is
11161 supported....
11162
11163 My Questions are:
11164
11165 Has anyone had any experience running ircservice 5.0.x on bahamut 1.4.36?
11166 if so, whats it like? (I know about the lack of szlines), but I am talking
11167 stability and whether it actually does work...
11168
11169 AND:
11170
11171 Are there any plans to add support to ircservices for bahamut 1.4.35+ to
11172 the existing bahamut module, or to add a new bahamut_new module or
11173 something like that? (I was thinking an automap of SZLINE to ip based KLINE
11174 or something along those lines?).....
11175
11176 What are the plans if any?
11177
11178 Thx
11179
11180 Mike
11181
11182
11183 ---
11184 Michael Smith (Warlock on IRC) (QQ:11165)
11185 "Do you smell something burning or is it me?"
11186 -- Joan of Arc
11187
11188
11189
11190 From gregk at wwwpages.com Mon Apr 26 12:54:39 2004
11191 From: gregk at wwwpages.com (gregk@wwwpages.com)
11192 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11193 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ
11194 enforcing.
11195 In-Reply-To: <000e01c42bc3$f5c43470$3d714fd9@thema>
11196 References: <20040426174658.8964.qmail@web86401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11197 <000e01c42bc3$f5c43470$3d714fd9@thema>
11198 Message-ID: <2064.192.168.1.1.1083009279.squirrel@sqmail.wwwpages.com>
11199
11200 wow, that was written like you are a paying customer, and not just running
11201 free software that he took the time and effort to write, test and
11202 distribute.
11203
11204 If you feel so strongly about it, why not look at other products? If the
11205 masses are as correct as you suggest, surely someone has dedicated the
11206 time to take that market!
11207
11208 just my $.02
11209
11210
11211
11212
11213 > Quite honestly I've been watching this argument fly around the mailing
11214 > list
11215 > for so long now that I personally am sick of it.
11216 >
11217 > Andy, I know you think you have valid reasons for not implementing this
11218 > choice, but even I, with my limited intelligence can see that you're
11219 > flogging a dead horse. Why not give people what they want?
11220 > I don't think it can be considered as a failure to admit that maybe the
11221 > masses might have a point, small as it might be. We all, and I include
11222 > myself in that all, want the choice. Dammit man if it slows down services
11223 > then we're forewarned already. It's no biggie. We'll handle it. Stop
11224 > saying
11225 > "No!" just because you think you know better then we do. I admit it. You
11226 > know wayyy more then I do, but I need this facility, and so do so many
11227 > others. Be kind to us, and please let us have the choice.
11228 >
11229 > Thema (AKA Olly webmaster and Admin www.adnd.com)
11230 >
11231 > -----Original Message-----
11232 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
11233 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net]On Behalf Of Dionisios K.
11234 > Sent: 26 April 2004 18:47
11235 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
11236 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ
11237 > enforcing.
11238 >
11239 >
11240 > Open channels? Idleserv? My idea is very more simple.
11241 > Just add a command to services to check if the first
11242 > user who join a +k mlocked channel knows the key. /cs
11243 > chankey #chan - and yes why not kickban a user who try
11244 > to join to a channel and he dont know the key.
11245 >
11246 > =====
11247 > Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11248 >
11249 >
11250 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11251 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11252 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11253 >
11254 > ---
11255 > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
11256 > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
11257 > Version: 6.0.667 / Virus Database: 429 - Release Date: 23/04/2004
11258 >
11259 > ---
11260 > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
11261 > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
11262 > Version: 6.0.667 / Virus Database: 429 - Release Date: 23/04/2004
11263 >
11264 >
11265 >
11266 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11267 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11268 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11269 >
11270
11271
11272
11273 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon Apr 26 13:14:26 2004
11274 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
11275 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11276 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ
11277 enforcing.
11278 Message-ID: <mailman.41.1098597726.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
11279
11280 Truer words were never typed. From my experiance with Andy (coming on several years now :p) Generally, when he says no for something, thats the final answer. Yes, this topic 'Bounces around' a lot but surely if people READ the previous posts from the archives (Dont say 'I cant find them' Enter 'Channel Key' into the search box), this wouldnt come up quite so often. And i'm sure it does say (but please dont quote me on this) that you should read through the archives BEFORE making a request submission.
11281
11282 Sorry if people concider this a rant. Its starting to get frustration to see the same topics come up, with the same things being said, and the same overall answer being ignored.
11283
11284 And C for Dummyies sucks *burns his copy* :p
11285
11286 /****************************************
11287 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
11288 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
11289 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
11290 ****************************************/
11291
11292
11293 /****************************************
11294 * From - Elijah <admin@nevernet.net>
11295 * To - 'IRC Services General Mailing List' <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
11296 * Sent - 2004-04-26 20:29:02
11297 * Subject - RE: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11298 ****************************************/
11299
11300 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
11301
11302 >It comes down to Andy having to write the code for this. Making demands is no
11303 >way to get someone to do something when he's doing it for free. If you don't
11304 >like ircservices because it doesn't have the feature you want, there are plenty
11305 >of other services versions out there. There is no need to be disrespectful or
11306 >unappreciative of Andy's work on this project. It's his project, it's his
11307 >vision. If he says "NO!" a thousand times, that's his prerogative. If you don't
11308 >like his answer, go buy "C For Dummies" and write your own services.
11309 >
11310 >> Be kind to us, and please let us have the choice.
11311 >
11312 >You have the choice. Make it.
11313 >
11314 >Elijah
11315 >
11316 >-----Original Message-----
11317 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
11318 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of thema@adnd.com
11319 >Sent: Monday, 26 April, 2004 2:24 PM
11320 >To: 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
11321 >Subject: RE: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11322 >
11323 >Quite honestly I've been watching this argument fly around the mailing list
11324 >for so long now that I personally am sick of it.
11325 >
11326 >Andy, I know you think you have valid reasons for not implementing this
11327 >choice, but even I, with my limited intelligence can see that you're
11328 >flogging a dead horse. Why not give people what they want?
11329 >I don't think it can be considered as a failure to admit that maybe the
11330 >masses might have a point, small as it might be. We all, and I include
11331 >myself in that all, want the choice. Dammit man if it slows down services
11332 >then we're forewarned already. It's no biggie. We'll handle it. Stop saying
11333 >"No!" just because you think you know better then we do. I admit it. You
11334 >know wayyy more then I do, but I need this facility, and so do so many
11335 >others. Be kind to us, and please let us have the choice.
11336 >
11337 >Thema (AKA Olly webmaster and Admin www.adnd.com)
11338 >
11339 >
11340 >
11341 >
11342 >------------------------------------------------------------------
11343 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11344 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11345 >.
11346
11347 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
11348
11349
11350
11351
11352 From azoff at se.linux.org Mon Apr 26 13:31:40 2004
11353 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
11354 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11355 Subject: [IRCServices] bahamut-1.4.35 or .36
11356 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.0.20040426215335.03e07550@196.14.3.98>
11357 References: <6.1.0.6.0.20040426215335.03e07550@196.14.3.98>
11358 Message-ID: <408D71AC.7060909@se.linux.org>
11359
11360 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
11361 Hash: SHA1
11362
11363 Michael Smith wrote:
11364 [snip]
11365 | Has anyone had any experience running ircservice 5.0.x on bahamut
11366 | 1.4.36? if so, whats it like? (I know about the lack of szlines), but I
11367 | am talking stability and whether it actually does work...
11368
11369 I have been runing bahamut-1.4(36)p3 (and the other releases) for quite
11370 some time now. Iirc there are security holes in the 35 release.
11371
11372 | Are there any plans to add support to ircservices for bahamut 1.4.35+ to
11373 | the existing bahamut module, or to add a new bahamut_new module or
11374 | something like that? (I was thinking an automap of SZLINE to ip based
11375 | KLINE or something along those lines?).....
11376
11377 For my network, the "old" module works fine, I haven't got any problems
11378 using it with either the 35 or the 36 releases.
11379
11380 What do you think wont work with the "old" module?
11381
11382 Regards,
11383 - --
11384 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
11385 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
11386 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
11387 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
11388
11389 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
11390 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
11391 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
11392
11393 iD8DBQFAjXGreY7jmtvbDP0RAgiIAJ4gxGNwP1kgE0UB5gN2FMpHBqayrQCgpkOU
11394 NLsG8SS7eiS4qzXvdaTwsR8=
11395 =42Uo
11396 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
11397
11398
11399 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Mon Apr 26 14:07:38 2004
11400 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11401 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11402 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11403 Message-ID: <20040426210738.31380.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11404
11405 1) I think its not right to ignore an email even if
11406 the answer exists on the search box:-p 2) An answer
11407 for him who said that Andrew always says no.. Just
11408 respect his work for this FREE and generally nice
11409 project and if you dont like it use another services.
11410
11411 =====
11412 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11413
11414
11415
11416 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Apr 27 09:28:02 2004
11417 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11418 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11419 Subject: [IRCServices] bahamut-1.4.35 or .36
11420 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.0.20040426215335.03e07550@196.14.3.98>
11421 Message-ID: <408da9a1.70666@achurch.org>
11422
11423 >Are there any plans to add support to ircservices for bahamut 1.4.35+ to
11424 >the existing bahamut module, or to add a new bahamut_new module or
11425 >something like that? (I was thinking an automap of SZLINE to ip based KLINE
11426 >or something along those lines?).....
11427
11428 Basically, I got tired of the Bahamut developers changing the protocol
11429 every release or two, so I decided to not bother updating the protocol
11430 module until they moved to version 1.5 or 1.6. If I have some free time I
11431 may look at updating the module for 1.4.36, but it's not high on my
11432 priority list.
11433
11434 --Andrew Church
11435 achurch@achurch.org
11436 http://achurch.org/
11437
11438
11439 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Apr 27 09:31:17 2004
11440 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11441 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11442 Subject: [IRCServices] Releasing a protocol module
11443 In-Reply-To: <200404241203.i3OC3a114848@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
11444 Message-ID: <408daa1d.70676@achurch.org>
11445
11446 Send me your source and I'll take a look at it, but I'm hesitant to
11447 add support for something that uses such an unusual protocol.
11448
11449 --Andrew Church
11450 achurch@achurch.org
11451 http://achurch.org/
11452
11453 >Hi,
11454 >
11455 >Recently ive been developing a protocol module for my ircd (www.inspircd.org) which is nearing completion. Is there any way i could get the protocol module bundled with the others in the ircservices package when it is complete? It will of course need some
11456 > tidying up, and im sure Andy will want to make some tweaks so it fits in with his coding style. Due to the nature of my ircd ive had to put some weird/ugly hacks into the protocol module such as capturing builtins such as privmsg as 'extra' commands (thi
11457 >s has to be done because the format of the commands is totally different to any other ircd) - but it appears to work fine so far.
11458 >
11459 >Any more information on this?
11460 >
11461 >Thanks lots,
11462 >Brain
11463 >
11464 >
11465 >------------------------------------------------------------------
11466
11467
11468 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Apr 27 09:38:44 2004
11469 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11470 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11471 Subject: [IRCServices] IdleServ, channel keys, and more
11472 Message-ID: <408db319.70771@achurch.org>
11473
11474 Summing up a few issues:
11475
11476 >Quite honestly I've been watching this argument fly around the mailing list
11477 >for so long now that I personally am sick of it.
11478 >
11479 >Andy, I know you think you have valid reasons for not implementing this
11480 >choice, but even I, with my limited intelligence can see that you're
11481 >flogging a dead horse. Why not give people what they want?
11482
11483 Because I don't want to. As others have correctly pointed out,
11484 Services is something I do in my spare time because I enjoy it; while I'm
11485 not one to upset people out of spite, neither do I intend to use my
11486 personal time on things I don't like. I'm sure the people who want an
11487 IdleServ or similar feature have, to their minds, excellent reasons for it.
11488 However, none of those reasons has convinced _me_ of its usefulness, and
11489 I am also not interested in writing it for its own sake; therefore, my
11490 answer is "no". It's that simple.
11491
11492 Or did you want to hire me to write it? If you pay, I'll write
11493 IdleServ and anything else you want.
11494
11495 >It can't slow down Services too greatly as a server such as GamSurge
11496 >A.K.A. GamesNet who uses SRVX has ChanServ in their 30,000+ Channels with
11497 >obviously more users than that. They seem to respond perfectly fine 90-95%
11498 >of the time. Perhaps SRVX has developed a good method? They mustn't ignore
11499 >channel text as srvx has channel triggers?
11500
11501 One, 90-95% isn't good enough for me. Two, they probably have a
11502 high-powered server for running Services, but not everyone has such a
11503 server--my own homepage, for example, is served off a 166MHz Pentium, and
11504 the network I originally developed Services for used a 486 for both
11505 Services and the ircd.
11506
11507 >Hello.. I think this is a solution... services must
11508 >check if the user know the channel key. So if someone
11509 >is the *first* user who wants to join a channel with
11510 >mlock +k he must type a command first like this: /cs
11511 >keyjoin #chan channel key ... If someone try to join a
11512 >channel without typing this command ChanServ will
11513 >kick and ban him..
11514
11515 This is an interesting thought, but the same thing should be able to
11516 be accomplished with ChanServ access lists and SET RESTRICTED.
11517
11518 >1) I think its not right to ignore an email even if
11519 >the answer exists on the search box:-p
11520
11521 In general, I don't ignore messages just out of spite. I do tend to
11522 ignore them if (1) the answer is in the FAQ, (2) the sender refuses to
11523 listen to what I've already said, or (3) the message isn't readable at all,
11524 e.g. HTML or multipart mail (Craig McLure, check your mailreader settings--
11525 some of your messages are going out as multipart base64, which my
11526 mailreader doesn't grok). Again, for something I'm doing on my free time,
11527 I think that's perfectly reasonable.
11528
11529 --Andrew Church
11530 achurch@achurch.org
11531 http://achurch.org/
11532
11533
11534 From evilrabidmonkey at hotmail.com Mon Apr 26 19:08:19 2004
11535 From: evilrabidmonkey at hotmail.com (Teddy Wexler)
11536 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11537 Subject: [IRCServices] Unexplanable disconnect!
11538 Message-ID: <BAY10-F13lib4g3Sv0Y000123c1@hotmail.com>
11539
11540 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
11541 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040426/bcb09dc5/attachment.htm
11542 From quension at mac.com Mon Apr 26 19:13:35 2004
11543 From: quension at mac.com (Trevor Talbot)
11544 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11545 Subject: [IRCServices] bahamut-1.4.35 or .36
11546 In-Reply-To: <408da9a1.70666@achurch.org>
11547 Message-ID: <7CE566F2-97F0-11D8-841C-0003938D6866@mac.com>
11548
11549 On Monday, Apr 26, 2004, at 17:28 US/Pacific, Andrew Church wrote:
11550
11551 >> Are there any plans to add support to ircservices for bahamut 1.4.35+
11552 >> to the existing bahamut module, or to add a new bahamut_new module or
11553 >> something like that? (I was thinking an automap of SZLINE to ip based
11554 >> KLINE or something along those lines?).....
11555 >
11556 > Basically, I got tired of the Bahamut developers changing the
11557 > protocol every release or two, so I decided to not bother updating the
11558 > protocol module until they moved to version 1.5 or 1.6. If I have
11559 > some free time I may look at updating the module for 1.4.36, but it's
11560 > not high on my priority list.
11561
11562 1.8 is due for release soonish, and has at least 3 new channel modes,
11563 among other things. It would be a good time to look at it again.
11564
11565 -- Quension
11566
11567
11568
11569 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Mon Apr 26 21:51:08 2004
11570 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11571 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11572 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11573 Message-ID: <20040427045108.86467.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11574
11575 Andrew interesting means that.. 1) You will add it on
11576 the future if you find some free time or 2) its
11577 interesting but you can use restricted on. ?:-P
11578
11579 =====
11580 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11581
11582
11583
11584 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Apr 27 14:47:28 2004
11585 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11586 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11587 Subject: [IRCServices] Creating passworded channels withChanServ enforcing.
11588 In-Reply-To: <20040427045108.86467.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11589 Message-ID: <408df48a.71161@achurch.org>
11590
11591 >Andrew interesting means that.. 1) You will add it on
11592 >the future if you find some free time or 2) its
11593 >interesting but you can use restricted on. ?:-P
11594
11595 It means I haven't really given a lot of thought to the interaction
11596 between IRC channel keys and ChanServ control features, and that at some
11597 point in the future (5.1 or later) I need to think about it more. I
11598 haven't decided yet what I'm going to do (if anything) about it, though.
11599
11600 --Andrew Church
11601 achurch@achurch.org
11602 http://achurch.org/
11603
11604
11605 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Apr 28 05:34:47 2004
11606 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11607 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:06 2004
11608 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11609 Message-ID: <20040428123447.69757.qmail@web86407.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11610
11611 Can i set how many seconds services must wait before
11612 force nick change or kill the user if he using a
11613 forbidden or a suspended nickname? If i cant change
11614 the time, a feature like this may be added on ircservices?
11615
11616 =====
11617 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11618
11619
11620
11621 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Apr 28 22:52:09 2004
11622 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11623 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11624 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11625 In-Reply-To: <20040428123447.69757.qmail@web86407.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11626 Message-ID: <408fb726.74327@achurch.org>
11627
11628 >Can i set how many seconds services must wait before
11629 >force nick change or kill the user if he using a
11630 >forbidden or a suspended nickname? If i cant change
11631 >the time, a feature like this may be added on ircservices?
11632
11633 I think the current values of 60 and 20 seconds are reasonable. What
11634 reason would you have for changing them?
11635
11636 --Andrew Church
11637 achurch@achurch.org
11638 http://achurch.org/
11639
11640
11641 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed Apr 28 07:09:44 2004
11642 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
11643 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11644 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11645 Message-ID: <200404281409.i3SE9j115605@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
11646
11647 if a nickname is forbidden, why should they have any period of time where they can use the nickname at all? if its forbidden imho a user shouldnt be able to use it at all period.
11648
11649 <insert $0.02 to continue>
11650
11651 >>Can i set how many seconds services must wait before
11652 >>force nick change or kill the user if he using a
11653 >>forbidden or a suspended nickname? If i cant change
11654 >>the time, a feature like this may be added on ircservices?
11655 >
11656 > I think the current values of 60 and 20 seconds are reasonable. What
11657 >reason would you have for changing them?
11658 >
11659 > --Andrew Church
11660 > achurch@achurch.org
11661 > http://achurch.org/
11662 >
11663 >------------------------------------------------------------------
11664 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11665 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11666
11667
11668
11669 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Apr 28 07:28:06 2004
11670 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11671 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11672 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11673 Message-ID: <20040428142806.46402.qmail@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11674
11675 I havent any reason to change it:-Ρ. Its only a
11676 suggestion. But anyway i agree with Craig (no delay).
11677
11678 =====
11679 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11680
11681
11682
11683 From spam at b3design.ch Wed Apr 28 07:30:03 2004
11684 From: spam at b3design.ch (Pix0r)
11685 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11686 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11687 In-Reply-To: <200404281409.i3SE9j115605@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
11688 Message-ID: <BCB58C8B.65A2%spam@b3design.ch>
11689
11690 Correct me if I'm wrong, but everytime someone asks a question like this a
11691 huge disscussion follows about 'why' he is asking the question, who cares?
11692 Why not just answer his question ? :P
11693
11694 Just my 2 1/2 cents
11695
11696
11697 On 28/4/04 16:09, "Craig Edwards" <brain@winbot.co.uk> wrote:
11698
11699 > if a nickname is forbidden, why should they have any period of time where they
11700 > can use the nickname at all? if its forbidden imho a user shouldnt be able to
11701 > use it at all period.
11702 >
11703 > <insert $0.02 to continue>
11704 >
11705 >>> Can i set how many seconds services must wait before
11706 >>> force nick change or kill the user if he using a
11707 >>> forbidden or a suspended nickname? If i cant change
11708 >>> the time, a feature like this may be added on ircservices?
11709 >>
11710 >> I think the current values of 60 and 20 seconds are reasonable. What
11711 >> reason would you have for changing them?
11712 >>
11713 >> --Andrew Church
11714 >> achurch@achurch.org
11715 >> http://achurch.org/
11716 >>
11717 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
11718 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11719 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11720 >
11721 >
11722 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11723 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11724 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11725
11726
11727
11728 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Apr 28 08:13:05 2004
11729 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11730 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11731 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11732 Message-ID: <20040428151305.17702.qmail@web86407.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11733
11734 Pix0r... Do you know whats a mail list? If you know
11735 this is my answer to your email.
11736
11737 =====
11738 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11739
11740
11741
11742 From Craig at chatspike.net Wed Apr 28 10:27:16 2004
11743 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
11744 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11745 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11746 Message-ID: <mailman.42.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
11747
11748 I think you misread Andy, he said for forbidden and suspended nicknames, although..
11749
11750 *puts in his 2c*
11751
11752 I agree with others, there shouldnt need to be a wait, because if you forbid an offencive nickname, and give people some time before it forces a nick change, they can still use that nickname to offend people, which really isnt a good thing.
11753
11754 <insert $2.00 to continue cause i'm poor>
11755
11756 /****************************************
11757 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
11758 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
11759 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
11760 ****************************************/
11761
11762
11763 /****************************************
11764 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
11765 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
11766 * Sent - 2004-04-28 22:52:09
11767 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Nick change
11768 ****************************************/
11769
11770 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
11771
11772 >>Can i set how many seconds services must wait before
11773 >>force nick change or kill the user if he using a
11774 >>forbidden or a suspended nickname? If i cant change
11775 >>the time, a feature like this may be added on ircservices?
11776 >
11777 > I think the current values of 60 and 20 seconds are reasonable. What
11778 >reason would you have for changing them?
11779 >
11780 > --Andrew Church
11781 > achurch@achurch.org
11782 > http://achurch.org/
11783 >
11784 >------------------------------------------------------------------
11785 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11786 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11787 >.
11788
11789 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
11790
11791
11792
11793
11794 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Apr 29 09:07:46 2004
11795 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11796 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11797 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.31 released
11798 Message-ID: <409047a0.15274@achurch.org>
11799
11800 Services 5.0.31 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
11801
11802 ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ (South Africa)
11803 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
11804
11805 86e6c8d806452275dd907ffa8a5c7b02 ircservices-5.0.31.tar.gz
11806 35cfd814620979fa06a3b6c431538c88 ircservices-5.0.31.diff.gz
11807 7092005485ea46fff0ed9bc242e4ae95 ircservices-5.0.31-1.i386.rpm
11808 e8fbaf67458af5912e9ba927b2728e45 ircservices_5.0.31-1_i386.deb
11809
11810 The other mirrors should have it shortly.
11811
11812 This release is to fix a crash when using Services with the tr-ircd
11813 server; ChanServ SET MLOCK +J was not processed correctly, leading to
11814 crashes in some cases. People using Services with tr-ircd should upgrade
11815 immediately.
11816
11817 Changes in version 5.0.31
11818 -------------------------
11819 2004/04/29 Fixed crash with MLOCK +J when using trircd protocol.
11820 Reported by <irc@teknet.com.tr>
11821 2004/04/28 Added stricter checks on module loading order.
11822
11823 --Andrew Church
11824 achurch@achurch.org
11825 http://achurch.org/
11826
11827
11828 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Apr 29 09:19:45 2004
11829 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11830 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11831 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick change
11832 In-Reply-To: <408feac7.07741@mail.achurch.org>
11833 Message-ID: <40904b21.15312@achurch.org>
11834
11835 True, I misread. Still, I don't see a problem with 60 seconds. If
11836 you want to keep people from using certain strings in nicks at all (no
11837 grace period), use SQlines instead--forbid/suspend are intended to be used
11838 against particular users, not particular nicknames, and an instant kill
11839 would not be appropriate for another user who just happened to pick the
11840 same nickname.
11841
11842 --Andrew Church
11843 achurch@achurch.org
11844 http://achurch.org/
11845
11846 >I think you misread Andy, he said for forbidden and suspended nicknames, although..
11847 >
11848 >*puts in his 2c*
11849 >
11850 >I agree with others, there shouldnt need to be a wait, because if you forbid an offencive nickname, and give people some time before it forces a nick change, they can still use that nickname to offend people, which really isnt a good thing.
11851 >
11852 ><insert $2.00 to continue cause i'm poor>
11853 >
11854 >/****************************************
11855 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
11856 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
11857 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
11858 > ****************************************/
11859 >
11860 >
11861 >/****************************************
11862 > * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
11863 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
11864 > * Sent - 2004-04-28 22:52:09
11865 > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Nick change
11866 > ****************************************/
11867 >
11868 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
11869 >
11870 >>>Can i set how many seconds services must wait before
11871 >>>force nick change or kill the user if he using a
11872 >>>forbidden or a suspended nickname? If i cant change
11873 >>>the time, a feature like this may be added on ircservices?
11874 >>
11875 >> I think the current values of 60 and 20 seconds are reasonable. What
11876 >>reason would you have for changing them?
11877 >>
11878 >> --Andrew Church
11879 >> achurch@achurch.org
11880 >> http://achurch.org/
11881 >>
11882 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
11883 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11884 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11885 >>.
11886 >
11887 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
11888 >
11889 >
11890 >
11891 >------------------------------------------------------------------
11892 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11893 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11894
11895
11896 From Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com Thu Apr 29 09:04:49 2004
11897 From: Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com (Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com)
11898 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11899 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
11900 Message-ID: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB5A@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
11901
11902 Hello all
11903
11904 Sutiation:
11905 Someone get registered nick and nickserv notice him to change nick or
11906 identify. When time expired, nick changed to nick :), contains
11907 GuestNickPrefix value.
11908
11909 But why not change nick without GuectNickPrefix, just add random digits
11910 to current nick?
11911
11912 To activate this feature make some key for GuestNickPrefix.
11913
11914
11915 ---
11916 thanks
11917
11918
11919 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Thu Apr 29 09:27:35 2004
11920 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11921 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11922 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
11923 Message-ID: <20040429162735.80678.qmail@web86404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11924
11925 I think this feature its completely useless.. Just
11926 change your nick manually to anything you want ...
11927 Dont ask from services to do everything.
11928
11929 =====
11930 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11931
11932
11933
11934 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Thu Apr 29 09:28:14 2004
11935 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
11936 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11937 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
11938 Message-ID: <20040429162814.82853.qmail@web86401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
11939
11940 I think that this feature its completely useless..
11941 Just change your nick manually to anything you want
11942 ... Dont ask from services to do everything.
11943
11944 =====
11945 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11946
11947
11948
11949 From Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com Thu Apr 29 09:42:19 2004
11950 From: Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com (Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com)
11951 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11952 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
11953 Message-ID: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB5B@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
11954
11955 I think than this feature is already implement. I just ask to do it more
11956 frexible.
11957
11958 > -----Original Message-----
11959 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
11960 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
11961 > Dionisios K.
11962 > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:28 PM
11963 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
11964 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
11965 >
11966 > I think this feature its completely useless.. Just change
11967 > your nick manually to anything you want ...
11968 > Dont ask from services to do everything.
11969 >
11970 > =====
11971 > Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
11972 >
11973 >
11974 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11975 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11976 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11977 >
11978
11979
11980 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Apr 30 09:37:24 2004
11981 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11982 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
11983 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
11984 In-Reply-To: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB5B@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
11985 Message-ID: <4091a03a.37534@achurch.org>
11986
11987 >I think than this feature is already implement. I just ask to do it more
11988 >frexible.
11989
11990 I agree, this is useless flexibility. It also adds complications in
11991 that Services has to check whether the new randomly-generated nick is
11992 registered (GuestNickPrefix nicks are not allowed to be registered so they
11993 don't have this problem).
11994
11995 --Andrew Church
11996 achurch@achurch.org
11997 http://achurch.org/
11998
11999
12000 From Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com Thu Apr 29 19:58:12 2004
12001 From: Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com (Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com)
12002 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12003 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12004 Message-ID: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB5D@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
12005
12006 > >I think than this feature is already implement. I just ask to do it
12007 > >more frexible.
12008 >
12009 > I agree, this is useless flexibility. It also adds
12010 > complications in that Services has to check whether the new
12011 > randomly-generated nick is registered (GuestNickPrefix nicks
12012 > are not allowed to be registered so they don't have this problem).
12013
12014 Services prevent randomly-generated nick registration, that start with
12015 CuestNickPrefix and only that nicks, but they _doesn`t_ prevent
12016 registration for randomly-generated nicks (flood registration).
12017 Therefore any restrictions, than comes with GuestNickPrefix, are
12018 useless, isn`t it?
12019
12020
12021
12022 From Craig at chatspike.net Thu Apr 29 20:46:31 2004
12023 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
12024 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12025 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12026 Message-ID: <mailman.43.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12027
12028 Andrew isnt refering to 'randomly generated nick registration', Andy is just stating that the nickname that services will change your nick to is 'randomly generated' what and is also saying, that if it were to generate a new nickname for a user based on its current nickname, it would have to check to see if that nickname is registered before changing it. (for example, Craig is taken, someone tries to use it, Services wants to change the nickname to Craig132123, it has to check to see if Craig132123 is already registered before changing the nickname. Otherwise, you may hit another already registered nick.). Nicknames with the guestprefix cannot be registered at all. Meaning that services doesnt have to perform registration checks on it before changing the nick.
12029
12030 There are other methods of preventing mass registration, including Registration delays, E-Mail authorisation, etc.
12031
12032 /****************************************
12033 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12034 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
12035 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12036 ****************************************/
12037
12038
12039 /****************************************
12040 * From - Alexander_Zverev <Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com>
12041 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12042 * Sent - 2004-04-30 03:58:12
12043 * Subject - RE: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12044 ****************************************/
12045
12046 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
12047
12048 >> >I think than this feature is already implement. I just ask to do it
12049 >> >more frexible.
12050 >>
12051 >> I agree, this is useless flexibility. It also adds
12052 >> complications in that Services has to check whether the new
12053 >> randomly-generated nick is registered (GuestNickPrefix nicks
12054 >> are not allowed to be registered so they don't have this problem).
12055 >
12056 >Services prevent randomly-generated nick registration, that start with
12057 >CuestNickPrefix and only that nicks, but they _doesn`t_ prevent
12058 >registration for randomly-generated nicks (flood registration).
12059 >Therefore any restrictions, than comes with GuestNickPrefix, are
12060 >useless, isn`t it?
12061 >
12062 >
12063 >------------------------------------------------------------------
12064 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12065 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12066 >.
12067
12068 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
12069
12070
12071
12072
12073 From Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com Thu Apr 29 21:03:13 2004
12074 From: Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com (Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com)
12075 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12076 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12077 Message-ID: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB5E@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
12078
12079 > Andrew isnt refering to 'randomly generated nick
12080 > registration', Andy is just stating that the nickname that
12081 > services will change your nick to is 'randomly generated'
12082 > what and is also saying, that if it were to generate a new
12083 > nickname for a user based on its current nickname, it would
12084 > have to check to see if that nickname is registered before
12085 > changing it. (for example, Craig is taken, someone tries to
12086 > use it, Services wants to change the nickname to Craig132123,
12087 > it has to check to see if Craig132123 is already registered
12088 > before changing the nickname. Otherwise, you may hit another
12089 > already registered nick.). Nicknames with the guestprefix
12090 > cannot be registered at all. Meaning that services doesnt
12091 > have to perform registration checks on it before changing the nick.
12092
12093 This situstion are very highly unlikely, isn`t?
12094 Improve randomization, add one more check, that`s it.
12095 Anyway, services ask password again.
12096
12097
12098 PS:
12099 This feature alredy implemended on some services and I don`t see any
12100 problem there.
12101
12102
12103
12104
12105 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Apr 30 15:54:14 2004
12106 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12107 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12108 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12109 In-Reply-To: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB5E@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
12110 Message-ID: <4091f86d.40452@achurch.org>
12111
12112 >This situstion are very highly unlikely, isn`t?
12113 >Improve randomization, add one more check, that`s it.
12114 >Anyway, services ask password again.
12115
12116 If you, as a new user, encountered this situation, how would you feel
12117 to have your nick repeatedly changed every 60 (or even 20) seconds when
12118 you're not even familiar with how the registration system works?
12119
12120 >PS:
12121 >This feature alredy implemended on some services and I don`t see any
12122 >problem there.
12123
12124 Then please feel free to use one of those programs.
12125
12126 --Andrew Church
12127 achurch@achurch.org
12128 http://achurch.org/
12129
12130
12131 From Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com Fri Apr 30 00:11:54 2004
12132 From: Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com (Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com)
12133 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12134 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12135 Message-ID: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB61@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
12136
12137 > >This situstion are very highly unlikely, isn`t?
12138 > >Improve randomization, add one more check, that`s it.
12139 > >Anyway, services ask password again.
12140 >
12141 > If you, as a new user, encountered this situation, how
12142 > would you feel to have your nick repeatedly changed every 60
12143 > (or even 20) seconds when you're not even familiar with how
12144 > the registration system works?
12145
12146 Then this person is VERY LUCKY, if his randomly-generated nick always
12147 set to one of registered. Improve randomization to decrease probability
12148 of this situation, or check in nickserv database for newly generated
12149 nick.
12150
12151 Why you do this so complicated?
12152
12153
12154
12155 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Apr 30 16:56:47 2004
12156 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12157 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12158 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12159 In-Reply-To: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB61@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
12160 Message-ID: <409206cf.40625@achurch.org>
12161
12162 >> If you, as a new user, encountered this situation, how
12163 >> would you feel to have your nick repeatedly changed every 60
12164 >> (or even 20) seconds when you're not even familiar with how
12165 >> the registration system works?
12166 >
12167 >Then this person is VERY LUCKY, if his randomly-generated nick always
12168 >set to one of registered. Improve randomization to decrease probability
12169 >of this situation, or check in nickserv database for newly generated
12170 >nick.
12171 >
12172 >Why you do this so complicated?
12173
12174 Because I DON'T WANT TO IMPLEMENT IT. End of story.
12175
12176 --Andrew Church
12177 achurch@achurch.org
12178 http://achurch.org/
12179
12180
12181 From azoff at se.linux.org Fri Apr 30 01:29:06 2004
12182 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?VG9yYmpvInJuIFN2ZW5zc29u?=)
12183 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12184 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12185 In-Reply-To: <409206cf.40625@achurch.org>
12186 References: <409206cf.40625@achurch.org>
12187 Message-ID: <40920E52.50701@se.linux.org>
12188
12189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
12190 Hash: SHA1
12191
12192 Andrew Church wrote:
12193 | Because I DON'T WANT TO IMPLEMENT IT. End of story.
12194
12195 I agree with Andrew, I don't think it's a good thing to use an ordinary
12196 nick as a base for generated nicks. That would if something, confuse the
12197 people talking to [s]he in the channels. Please continue using the
12198 Guestnick thing :)
12199
12200 Regards,
12201 - --
12202 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
12203 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
12204 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
12205 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
12206
12207 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
12208 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
12209 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
12210
12211 iD8DBQFAkg5ReY7jmtvbDP0RAkrXAKCjwZrPYAWph3hH5uKODpd3OVq5kwCgjNwm
12212 By/+rM56D/1zw5KaPjJt7tc=
12213 =SxU1
12214 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
12215
12216
12217 From Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com Fri Apr 30 01:46:00 2004
12218 From: Alexander_Zverev at oxy.com (Alexander_Zverev@oxy.com)
12219 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12220 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12221 Message-ID: <98F925CCB4B66942B75FEA9293496807017DAB62@nnzwexc1.nizhnevartovsk.intloxy.com>
12222
12223 > Torbjo"rn Svensson
12224 > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:29 PM
12225
12226 > I agree with Andrew, I don't think it's a good thing to use
12227 > an ordinary nick as a base for generated nicks. That would if
12228 > something, confuse the people talking to [s]he in the
12229 > channels. Please continue using the Guestnick thing :)
12230
12231 Many nicks have one base, and this is not a problem.
12232
12233 Torbjo
12234 Torbjo1965
12235 Torbjo1
12236 Torbjo_
12237 Svensson
12238 Svensson_
12239 _Svensson
12240
12241 And so on and so on, on big irc-network this is normal.
12242 What you will do with this persons, that use nick, like yours?
12243 Ask them to change it? It will be funny.
12244
12245
12246 As I see, there is no problem to implement this in anyway, Andrew "DON'T
12247 WANT TO IMPLEMENT IT."
12248
12249
12250 The end.
12251
12252
12253 From conrad at raztech.za.net Fri Apr 30 01:51:17 2004
12254 From: conrad at raztech.za.net (Conrad Steyn)
12255 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12256 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: Feature: nickchange and guestnickprefix
12257 Message-ID: <1083315077.15405.16.camel@diablo>
12258
12259 hey all,
12260
12261 well this is a nice feature BUT.. irc services doent have it so too
12262 bad..
12263
12264 the only nice thing about set prefix is that if you use a type of
12265 services that go down alot u can set it to use nick_ and not change to
12266 guest..
12267
12268 i'm a ex cygnus user..[in the process of moving over to bigger and
12269 better services(irc services)] they have that feature but as i said..
12270 its needed coz services drop at least every day..
12271
12272
12273
12274
12275 From conrad at raztech.za.net Fri Apr 30 01:59:58 2004
12276 From: conrad at raztech.za.net (Conrad Steyn)
12277 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12278 Subject: [IRCServices] Database conversion....
12279 Message-ID: <1083315597.15414.25.camel@diablo>
12280
12281 greets to all,
12282
12283 as said in my other mail.. im sadly using cygnus due to the fact that at
12284 the stage of implementing services i only had a w32 server..
12285
12286 now that im moving over to nix im able to load decent services.
12287 but my headache starts with the cygnus database..
12288
12289 cygnus can convert irc services's database [i dont see why anyone wanna
12290 go that route anyway] but cygnus isnt listed in the db converter of irc
12291 services..
12292 this is a minor headache to me but if needed i can convince my users
12293 [all 50 or so of them to start over].. but i dont want to make extra
12294 work for myself if the cygnus database can be converted ;p
12295
12296 great job on the services.. i tried to 'break' it while testing and ya..
12297 it doesnt seem possible :)
12298
12299 Ragards
12300
12301 Conrad Steyn <conrad@raztech.za.net>
12302 Raztech
12303
12304
12305
12306
12307 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Apr 30 20:12:14 2004
12308 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12309 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12310 Subject: [IRCServices] Database conversion....
12311 In-Reply-To: <1083315597.15414.25.camel@diablo>
12312 Message-ID: <409235f4.40762@achurch.org>
12313
12314 >cygnus can convert irc services's database [i dont see why anyone wanna
12315 >go that route anyway] but cygnus isnt listed in the db converter of irc
12316 >services..
12317
12318 It should be--do you have the latest version (5.0.31)?
12319
12320 crystal:/home/achurch/src/cvs/ircservices/tools> ./convert-db
12321 Directory name must be specified
12322 Usage: ./convert-db [-v] [+program-name] [options...] sourcedir
12323 The following program names are known:
12324 anope
12325 auspice
12326 bolivia
12327 cygnus
12328 daylight
12329 [...]
12330
12331 >great job on the services.. i tried to 'break' it while testing and ya..
12332 >it doesnt seem possible :)
12333
12334 Actually, I suspect at least one reason other programs are so unstable
12335 is because their authors focus too much on adding features and not enough
12336 on making it actually work right. (The same might be said of a certain
12337 widely-used operating system...) I believe that _less_ features, and more
12338 "just start it up and it works", is what makes good software, and to be
12339 honest I think IRC Services still has too many options, configuration
12340 settings and the like.
12341
12342 --Andrew Church
12343 achurch@achurch.org
12344 http://achurch.org/
12345
12346
12347 From conrad at raztech.za.net Fri Apr 30 05:34:05 2004
12348 From: conrad at raztech.za.net (Conrad Steyn)
12349 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12350 Subject: [IRCServices] Database conversion....
12351 In-Reply-To: <409235f4.40762@achurch.org>
12352 References: <409235f4.40762@achurch.org>
12353 Message-ID: <1083328445.2752.11.camel@diablo>
12354
12355 ahhh thank you soo much,
12356
12357 all my problems are sorted now and i'm running decent services
12358 ...
12359
12360 well i must say cygnus doesnt have that much features..
12361
12362 thanx once again for the hard work and dedication that went into writing
12363 this great service
12364
12365 --
12366 Conrad Steyn <conrad@raztech.za.net>
12367 Raztech
12368
12369 On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 22:12, Andrew Church wrote:
12370 > >cygnus can convert irc services's database [i dont see why anyone wanna
12371 > >go that route anyway] but cygnus isnt listed in the db converter of irc
12372 > >services..
12373 >
12374 > It should be--do you have the latest version (5.0.31)?
12375 >
12376 > crystal:/home/achurch/src/cvs/ircservices/tools> ./convert-db
12377 > Directory name must be specified
12378 > Usage: ./convert-db [-v] [+program-name] [options...] sourcedir
12379 > The following program names are known:
12380 > anope
12381 > auspice
12382 > bolivia
12383 > cygnus
12384 > daylight
12385 > [...]
12386 >
12387 > >great job on the services.. i tried to 'break' it while testing and ya..
12388 > >it doesnt seem possible :)
12389 >
12390 > Actually, I suspect at least one reason other programs are so unstable
12391 > is because their authors focus too much on adding features and not enough
12392 > on making it actually work right. (The same might be said of a certain
12393 > widely-used operating system...) I believe that _less_ features, and more
12394 > "just start it up and it works", is what makes good software, and to be
12395 > honest I think IRC Services still has too many options, configuration
12396 > settings and the like.
12397 >
12398 > --Andrew Church
12399 > achurch@achurch.org
12400 > http://achurch.org/
12401 >
12402 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12403 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12404 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12405
12406
12407
12408
12409
12410 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Mon May 3 10:17:28 2004
12411 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
12412 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12413 Subject: [IRCServices] swhois
12414 Message-ID: <20040503171728.80312.qmail@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12415
12416 Hello:->
12417 A new command may be added to services for the useful
12418 swhois command (unreal protocol) to add whois lines,
12419 without use the RAW command...
12420
12421 =====
12422 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12423
12424
12425
12426 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Mon May 3 10:28:29 2004
12427 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
12428 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12429 Subject: [IRCServices] swhois
12430 In-Reply-To: <20040503171728.80312.qmail@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12431 References: <20040503171728.80312.qmail@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12432 Message-ID: <1083605309.4170.5.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
12433
12434 I don't think that services should provide commands that are only
12435 available within certain protocols, meaning that services' command set
12436 ought not change when you switch your ircd.
12437
12438 Regards;
12439 yusuf.
12440
12441 On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 19:17, Dionisios K. wrote:
12442 > Hello:->
12443 > A new command may be added to services for the useful
12444 > swhois command (unreal protocol) to add whois lines,
12445 > without use the RAW command...
12446 >
12447 > =====
12448 > Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12449 >
12450 >
12451 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12452 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12453 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12454 --
12455 ------------------------------------------------------------------
12456 | Yusuf Iskenderoglu | You get to meet all sorts, |
12457 | eMail - uhc0@stud.uni-karlsruhe.de| in this line of work... |
12458 | eMail - s_iskend@ira.uka.de | |
12459 | ICQ UIN : 20587464 \ Slytherin | |
12460 ------------------------------------------------------------------
12461
12462
12463
12464 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 4 03:18:17 2004
12465 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12466 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12467 Subject: [IRCServices] swhois
12468 In-Reply-To: <1083605309.4170.5.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
12469 Message-ID: <40968d94.01726@achurch.org>
12470
12471 >I don't think that services should provide commands that are only
12472 >available within certain protocols, meaning that services' command set
12473 >ought not change when you switch your ircd.
12474
12475 Agreed; this is my basic stance as well--I only add such protocol-
12476 dependent features when there's significant benefit to them, such as nick
12477 changing or autokill exclusions. /swhois definitely does not fall into
12478 that category.
12479
12480 --Andrew Church
12481 achurch@achurch.org
12482 http://achurch.org/
12483
12484
12485 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon May 3 19:56:13 2004
12486 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
12487 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12488 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.31 released
12489 Message-ID: <mailman.44.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12490
12491 I just patched services up to .31, and noticed a warning when compiling..
12492
12493 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/chatspike/services/ircservices-5.0.0/modules/database'
12494 cd ../.. && gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log -I. -c modules/database/version4.c -o modules/database/version4.o
12495 modules/database/version4.c: In function `init_module':
12496 modules/database/version4.c:2756: warning: unused variable `mod'
12497
12498
12499 Just thought i would point it out :)
12500
12501 /****************************************
12502 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12503 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
12504 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12505 ****************************************/
12506
12507
12508 /****************************************
12509 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
12510 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12511 * Sent - 2004-04-29 09:07:46
12512 * Subject - [IRCServices] Services 5.0.31 released
12513 ****************************************/
12514
12515 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
12516
12517 > Services 5.0.31 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
12518 >
12519 >ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ (South Africa)
12520 >ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
12521 >
12522 >86e6c8d806452275dd907ffa8a5c7b02 ircservices-5.0.31.tar.gz
12523 >35cfd814620979fa06a3b6c431538c88 ircservices-5.0.31.diff.gz
12524 >7092005485ea46fff0ed9bc242e4ae95 ircservices-5.0.31-1.i386.rpm
12525 >e8fbaf67458af5912e9ba927b2728e45 ircservices_5.0.31-1_i386.deb
12526 >
12527 >The other mirrors should have it shortly.
12528 >
12529 > This release is to fix a crash when using Services with the tr-ircd
12530 >server; ChanServ SET MLOCK +J was not processed correctly, leading to
12531 >crashes in some cases. People using Services with tr-ircd should upgrade
12532 >immediately.
12533 >
12534 >Changes in version 5.0.31
12535 >-------------------------
12536 >2004/04/29 Fixed crash with MLOCK +J when using trircd protocol.
12537 > Reported by <irc@teknet.com.tr>
12538 >2004/04/28 Added stricter checks on module loading order.
12539 >
12540 > --Andrew Church
12541 > achurch@achurch.org
12542 > http://achurch.org/
12543 >
12544 >------------------------------------------------------------------
12545 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12546 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12547 >.
12548
12549 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
12550
12551
12552
12553
12554 From Craig at chatspike.net Mon May 3 20:31:49 2004
12555 From: Craig at chatspike.net (Craig McLure)
12556 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12557 Subject: [IRCServices] Something for lazy patchers..
12558 Message-ID: <mailman.45.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12559
12560 i've found that patching can often be a repetative task, so i've created a small shellscript that will do it for you.
12561
12562 NOTE: i take NO responcibility for what this script does to your services installation (and i'm sure no one else will either). It should work properly, but if used incorrectly can break a lot. (in most cases, its safer to do it by hand)
12563
12564 you execute the script by using ./<name> <version number>
12565 so in my case (as an example) ./patch 5.0.31
12566
12567 The Script will then download the 5.0.31 diff.gz, gunzip it, apply it, silently re-run ./configure, re-compile and re-'install' services. If you plan on using this, please remember to edit the values at the top of the script at they point to where you plan on installing the services binarys and data files (for use in the ./configure componant)
12568
12569 The Script follows (the text BETWEEN (NOT including) the ---'s):
12570 ---
12571 #!/bin/sh
12572
12573 # Configure these Parameters..
12574
12575 # Path to the services source directory (Can be relative)
12576 SERVDIR="/path/to/ircservices-5.0.xx"
12577
12578 # FULL PATHS to your services Binary and Data folders.
12579 BINDIR="/path/to/binary/dir"
12580 LIBDIR="/path/to/data/dir"
12581
12582 # You shouldnt need to edit below this line.
12583 if [ -z "$1" ] ; then
12584 echo "You must enter a version number."
12585 exit 0
12586 fi
12587 VERSION=$1
12588 PATCHDIR=`pwd`
12589 echo "Attempting to download ircservices-$VERSION.diff.gz from esper.net"
12590 wget -q ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ircservices-$VERSION.diff.gz
12591 if [ ! -e "ircservices-$VERSION.diff.gz" ] ; then
12592 echo "Services Version $VERSION Does Not Exist."
12593 exit 0
12594 fi
12595 gunzip ircservices-$VERSION.diff.gz
12596 cd $SERVDIR
12597 patch -p1 < $PATCHDIR/ircservices-$VERSION.diff
12598 echo "Download and Patch successful, silently running ./configure.."
12599 ./configure -bindest $BINDIR -datdest $LIBDIR >> /dev/null
12600 echo "Done! re-compiling and installing."
12601 make
12602 make install
12603 echo "Completed Successfully."
12604 ---
12605
12606 As i say, i dont use this script (it was just something i made cause i was bored) although i can say it does work when used properly. If it doesnt work for you, dont use it. I'm not planning on supporting this in any way.
12607
12608 Thanks.
12609
12610 /****************************************
12611 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12612 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
12613 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12614 ****************************************/
12615
12616
12617
12618 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 4 17:56:40 2004
12619 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12620 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12621 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.31 released
12622 In-Reply-To: <40970766.20605@mail.achurch.org>
12623 Message-ID: <40975ad7.03213@achurch.org>
12624
12625 Thanks, must have missed that one (: Fixed.
12626
12627 --Andrew Church
12628 achurch@achurch.org
12629 http://achurch.org/
12630
12631 >I just patched services up to .31, and noticed a warning when compiling..
12632 >
12633 >make[2]: Entering directory `/home/chatspike/services/ircservices-5.0.0/modules/database'
12634 >cd ../.. && gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log -I. -c modules/database/version4.c -o modules/database/version4.o
12635 >modules/database/version4.c: In function `init_module':
12636 >modules/database/version4.c:2756: warning: unused variable `mod'
12637 >
12638 >
12639 >Just thought i would point it out :)
12640 >
12641 >/****************************************
12642 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12643 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org - REVIVED
12644 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12645 > ****************************************/
12646 >
12647 >
12648 >/****************************************
12649 > * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
12650 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12651 > * Sent - 2004-04-29 09:07:46
12652 > * Subject - [IRCServices] Services 5.0.31 released
12653 > ****************************************/
12654 >
12655 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
12656 >
12657 >> Services 5.0.31 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
12658 >>
12659 >>ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ (South Africa)
12660 >>ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
12661 >>
12662 >>86e6c8d806452275dd907ffa8a5c7b02 ircservices-5.0.31.tar.gz
12663 >>35cfd814620979fa06a3b6c431538c88 ircservices-5.0.31.diff.gz
12664 >>7092005485ea46fff0ed9bc242e4ae95 ircservices-5.0.31-1.i386.rpm
12665 >>e8fbaf67458af5912e9ba927b2728e45 ircservices_5.0.31-1_i386.deb
12666 >>
12667 >>The other mirrors should have it shortly.
12668 >>
12669 >> This release is to fix a crash when using Services with the tr-ircd
12670 >>server; ChanServ SET MLOCK +J was not processed correctly, leading to
12671 >>crashes in some cases. People using Services with tr-ircd should upgrade
12672 >>immediately.
12673 >>
12674 >>Changes in version 5.0.31
12675 >>-------------------------
12676 >>2004/04/29 Fixed crash with MLOCK +J when using trircd protocol.
12677 >> Reported by <irc@teknet.com.tr>
12678 >>2004/04/28 Added stricter checks on module loading order.
12679 >>
12680 >> --Andrew Church
12681 >> achurch@achurch.org
12682 >> http://achurch.org/
12683 >>
12684 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
12685 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12686 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12687 >>.
12688 >
12689 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
12690 >
12691 >
12692 >
12693 >------------------------------------------------------------------
12694 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12695 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12696
12697
12698 From alisor at softhome.net Tue May 4 04:52:50 2004
12699 From: alisor at softhome.net (Ali Sor)
12700 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12701 Subject: [IRCServices] MS Limit
12702 Message-ID: <001801c431cf$64e224f0$0800000a@citir>
12703
12704 Hello;
12705
12706 I found out that there is a limit of 32767 memos to Servis Admins.
12707
12708 As a services root i wish i could limit that. yes there is a limit for normal users at modules.conf but i am thinking of another limit like Exclude have.
12709
12710 Default is 20 but if a services admin tries to raise it, he can only raise up to 100 for example.
12711
12712
12713
12714
12715
12716 -------------- next part --------------
12717 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
12718 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040504/29750a97/attachment.html
12719 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue May 4 07:00:42 2004
12720 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
12721 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12722 Subject: [IRCServices] MS Limit
12723 In-Reply-To: <001801c431cf$64e224f0$0800000a@citir>
12724 Message-ID: <20040504140042.86916.qmail@web86403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12725
12726 Useless for me.
12727 Just tell to your services admins to not raise the
12728 limit more than 100.
12729 If you can't trust your services admins.... i\I don't
12730 know who you can trust.
12731
12732
12733 --- Ali Sor <alisor@softhome.net> wrote: > Hello;
12734 >
12735 > I found out that there is a limit of 32767 memos to
12736 > Servis Admins.
12737 >
12738 > As a services root i wish i could limit that. yes
12739 > there is a limit for normal users at modules.conf
12740 > but i am thinking of another limit like Exclude
12741 > have.
12742 >
12743 > Default is 20 but if a services admin tries to raise
12744 > it, he can only raise up to 100 for example.
12745 >
12746 >
12747 >
12748 >
12749 >
12750 > >
12751 ------------------------------------------------------------------
12752 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
12753 > visit:
12754 >
12755 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12756 >
12757
12758 =====
12759 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12760
12761
12762
12763 From alisor at softhome.net Tue May 4 11:10:04 2004
12764 From: alisor at softhome.net (Ali Sor)
12765 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12766 Subject: [IRCServices] MS Limit
12767 References: <20040504140042.86916.qmail@web86403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12768 Message-ID: <002201c43203$0d13ab20$0800000a@citir>
12769
12770 Then we dont trust the admin and put another limit to exclude. We dont trust
12771 to admins so we made them not to getpass other admins or root....( i cant
12772 write a lot more)
12773
12774 This isnt about Trust...
12775
12776 ----- Original Message -----
12777 From: "Dionisios K." <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
12778 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12779 Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 5:00 PM
12780 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] MS Limit
12781
12782
12783 > Useless for me.
12784 > Just tell to your services admins to not raise the
12785 > limit more than 100.
12786 > If you can't trust your services admins.... i\I don't
12787 > know who you can trust.
12788 >
12789 >
12790 > --- Ali Sor <alisor@softhome.net> wrote: > Hello;
12791 > >
12792 > > I found out that there is a limit of 32767 memos to
12793 > > Servis Admins.
12794 > >
12795 > > As a services root i wish i could limit that. yes
12796 > > there is a limit for normal users at modules.conf
12797 > > but i am thinking of another limit like Exclude
12798 > > have.
12799 > >
12800 > > Default is 20 but if a services admin tries to raise
12801 > > it, he can only raise up to 100 for example.
12802 > >
12803 > >
12804 > >
12805 > >
12806 > >
12807 > > >
12808 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12809 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
12810 > > visit:
12811 > >
12812 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12813 > >
12814 >
12815 > =====
12816 > Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12817 >
12818 >
12819 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12820 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12821 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12822
12823
12824
12825 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue May 4 12:03:56 2004
12826 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
12827 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12828 Subject: [IRCServices] MS Limit
12829 Message-ID: <20040504190356.16049.qmail@web86407.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12830
12831 If you think that is the same thing getpass and MS limit..
12832
12833 =====
12834 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12835
12836
12837
12838 From Admin at VonitsaNet.gr Fri May 7 05:21:01 2004
12839 From: Admin at VonitsaNet.gr (Dionisios K.)
12840 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12841 Subject: [IRCServices] Akick
12842 Message-ID: <002201c4342d$c385b930$413d05d5@server>
12843
12844 Can be added to services a feature to show this information at the END of
12845 the akick reason?
12846
12847 * You were kicked from #test by ChanServ (Test Akick!!! - [ VoNiTsA : May 07
12848 * 13:02 ] )
12849 -------------- next part --------------
12850 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
12851 Name: smime.p7s
12852 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
12853 Size: 3233 bytes
12854 Desc: not available
12855 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040507/1fe7c647/smime.bin
12856 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri May 7 06:31:57 2004
12857 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
12858 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12859 Subject: [IRCServices] Akick
12860 Message-ID: <20040507133157.73034.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12861
12862 Can be added to services a feature to show this
12863 information at the END of
12864 the akick reason?
12865
12866 * You were kicked from #test by ChanServ (Test
12867 Akick!!! - [ VoNiTsA : May 07
12868 * 13:02 ] )
12869
12870 =====
12871 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12872
12873
12874
12875 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri May 7 07:00:24 2004
12876 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
12877 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12878 Subject: [IRCServices] Memoserv feature
12879 Message-ID: <20040507140024.6692.qmail@web86405.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
12880
12881 A new command for MEMOSERV may be added to
12882 ircservices:
12883 "CANCEL" -> Cancel last sent memo
12884
12885 =====
12886 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12887
12888
12889
12890 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri May 7 09:19:26 2004
12891 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
12892 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12893 Subject: [IRCServices] Akick
12894 Message-ID: <mailman.46.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12895
12896 I cant really see too much need for this, especially seeing as a lot of people who set akicks will want to be anonymous.
12897
12898 /****************************************
12899 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12900 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
12901 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
12902 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12903 ****************************************/
12904
12905
12906 /****************************************
12907 * From - Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
12908 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12909 * Sent - 2004-05-07 14:31:57
12910 * Subject - [IRCServices] Akick
12911 ****************************************/
12912
12913 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
12914
12915 >Can be added to services a feature to show this
12916 >information at the END of
12917 >the akick reason?
12918 >
12919 >* You were kicked from #test by ChanServ (Test
12920 >Akick!!! - [ VoNiTsA : May 07
12921 >* 13:02 ] )
12922 >
12923 >=====
12924 >Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12925 >
12926 >
12927 >------------------------------------------------------------------
12928 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12929 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12930 >.
12931
12932 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
12933
12934
12935
12936
12937 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri May 7 09:36:33 2004
12938 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
12939 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12940 Subject: [IRCServices] Memoserv feature
12941 Message-ID: <mailman.47.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12942
12943 I like this idea, BUT.. It wouldnt work with memo forwarding.
12944
12945 /****************************************
12946 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12947 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
12948 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
12949 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12950 ****************************************/
12951
12952
12953 /****************************************
12954 * From - Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
12955 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
12956 * Sent - 2004-05-07 15:00:24
12957 * Subject - [IRCServices] Memoserv feature
12958 ****************************************/
12959
12960 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
12961
12962 >A new command for MEMOSERV may be added to
12963 >ircservices:
12964 >"CANCEL" -> Cancel last sent memo
12965 >
12966 >=====
12967 >Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
12968 >
12969 >
12970 >------------------------------------------------------------------
12971 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12972 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12973 >.
12974
12975 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
12976
12977
12978
12979
12980 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat May 8 10:53:31 2004
12981 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
12982 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12983 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal Bug?
12984 Message-ID: <200405081753.i48HrW125705@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
12985
12986 Hi
12987
12988 When looking through the code for ircservices, i noticed that it doesnt list usermode +R (only registered users may message the nickname) in its list of extra modes supported by unrealircd (in modules/protocol/unreal.c). Should this be implemented as it is a known usermode to unreal, and it seems that services is blissfully unaware of its presence.
12989
12990 Thanks,
12991 Brain
12992
12993
12994
12995 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat May 8 10:57:14 2004
12996 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
12997 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
12998 Subject: [IRCServices] Fw: Unreal Bug?
12999 Message-ID: <200405081757.i48HvE125756@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
13000
13001 Followup: This appears to be a bug, verified by the fact that other ircds which support +R have a matching definition in the protocol module, whereas unreal doesnt. Example from grepping the modules/protocol dir:
13002
13003 modules/protocol/ptlink.c: {'R', {0x00008000}}, /* Allow PRIVMSGs from +r clients only */
13004
13005
13006
13007 >Hi
13008 >
13009 >When looking through the code for ircservices, i noticed that it doesnt list usermode +R (only registered users may >message the nickname) in its list of extra modes supported by unrealircd (in modules/protocol/unreal.c). Should this be >implemented as it is a known usermode to unreal, and it seems that services is blissfully unaware of its presence.
13010 >
13011 >Thanks,
13012 >Brain
13013
13014
13015
13016 From achurch at achurch.org Sun May 9 10:33:23 2004
13017 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13018 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13019 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal Bug?
13020 In-Reply-To: <200405081753.i48HrW125705@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
13021 Message-ID: <409d8a7a.50614@achurch.org>
13022
13023 >When looking through the code for ircservices, i noticed that it doesnt list usermode +R (only registered users may message the nickname) in its list of extra modes supported by unrealircd (in modules/protocol/unreal.c). Should this be implemented as it is a known usermode to unreal, and it seems that services is blissfully unaware of its presence.
13024
13025 This is not a mode Services needs to be aware of, hence it's not
13026 listed in the mode table.
13027
13028 --Andrew Church
13029 achurch@achurch.org
13030 http://achurch.org/
13031
13032
13033 From achurch at achurch.org Sun May 9 10:35:14 2004
13034 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13035 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13036 Subject: [IRCServices] Fw: Unreal Bug?
13037 In-Reply-To: <200405081757.i48HvE125756@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
13038 Message-ID: <409d8af0.50627@achurch.org>
13039
13040 >Followup: This appears to be a bug, verified by the fact that other ircds which support +R have a matching definition in the protocol module, whereas unreal doesnt. Example from grepping the modules/protocol dir:
13041 >
13042 >modules/protocol/ptlink.c: {'R', {0x00008000}}, /* Allow PRIVMSGs from +r clients only */
13043
13044 I probably put that in just to remind myself it exists, since I use
13045 PTlink less often than Unreal (read: never).
13046
13047 --Andrew Church
13048 achurch@achurch.org
13049 http://achurch.org/
13050
13051
13052 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Sun May 9 05:38:25 2004
13053 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
13054 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13055 Subject: [IRCServices] Memoserv cancel command
13056 Message-ID: <20040509123825.60292.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
13057
13058 I have sent an email to add a feature to cancel the
13059 last sent memo (disabled if forward is enabled).. Any
13060 reply for this feature?
13061
13062 =====
13063 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
13064
13065
13066
13067 From achurch at achurch.org Sun May 9 23:35:57 2004
13068 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13069 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13070 Subject: [IRCServices] Memoserv cancel command
13071 In-Reply-To: <20040509123825.60292.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
13072 Message-ID: <409e420e.51202@achurch.org>
13073
13074 >I have sent an email to add a feature to cancel the
13075 >last sent memo (disabled if forward is enabled).. Any
13076 >reply for this feature?
13077
13078 Unnecessary, and impossible besides if forwarding is in use (as was
13079 already mentioned). Watch what you write before you send; I won't help you
13080 take it back.
13081
13082 --Andrew Church
13083 achurch@achurch.org
13084 http://achurch.org/
13085
13086
13087 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Sun May 9 11:22:06 2004
13088 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13089 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13090 Subject: [IRCServices] error
13091 Message-ID: <011501c435f2$88fcc080$c133673e@ysar>
13092
13093 after full installation and start of services when i had going inside the client to make tests the answer is was :
13094 Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try again.
13095
13096 but in my system is running both ircd and ircservices so in this case with get this error ?
13097 -------------- next part --------------
13098 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
13099 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040509/77a3ceb3/attachment.html
13100 From azoff at se.linux.org Sun May 9 11:37:00 2004
13101 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-7?Q?Torbjo=22rn_Svensson?=)
13102 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13103 Subject: [IRCServices] error
13104 In-Reply-To: <011501c435f2$88fcc080$c133673e@ysar>
13105 References: <011501c435f2$88fcc080$c133673e@ysar>
13106 Message-ID: <409E7A4C.2020107@se.linux.org>
13107
13108 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
13109 Hash: SHA1
13110
13111 john sarantopoulos wrote:
13112 | after full installation and start of services when i had going inside
13113 the client to make tests the answer is was :
13114 | Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try again.
13115 |
13116 | but in my system is running both ircd and ircservices so in this case
13117 with get this error ?
13118
13119 Services ain't connected to you're ircd. Check yor're ircservices.conf
13120 and ircd.conf
13121
13122 Regards,
13123 - --
13124 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
13125 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
13126 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
13127 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
13128
13129 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
13130 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
13131 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
13132
13133 iD8DBQFAnnpLeY7jmtvbDP0RAs6oAKCUKujhsZsEbsDXHc6suoFhHzerUgCbBJ23
13134 FjQ24XIaxmdWrgWq4irECyw=
13135 =rYrP
13136 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13137
13138
13139 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Sun May 9 12:11:03 2004
13140 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
13141 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13142 Subject: [IRCServices] error
13143 In-Reply-To: <011501c435f2$88fcc080$c133673e@ysar>
13144 References: <011501c435f2$88fcc080$c133673e@ysar>
13145 Message-ID: <1084129863.6643.1.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
13146
13147 It might be, that the SERVICES_NAME definition of your ircd does not
13148 match to the name of the services server you have chosen, causing
13149 commands like
13150 /nickserv
13151 /chanserv not work.
13152
13153 If you tell us which version of the ircd and services you are running,
13154 we might help further.
13155
13156 Regards;
13157 y.
13158
13159 On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 20:22, john sarantopoulos wrote:
13160 > after full installation and start of services when i had going inside
13161 > the client to make tests the answer is was :
13162 > Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try
13163 > again.
13164 >
13165 > but in my system is running both ircd and ircservices so in this case
13166 > with get this error ?
13167 >
13168 >
13169 > ______________________________________________________________________
13170 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13171 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13172 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13173
13174
13175
13176 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Sun May 9 12:37:11 2004
13177 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13178 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13179 Subject: [IRCServices] error
13180 References: <011501c435f2$88fcc080$c133673e@ysar>
13181 <1084129863.6643.1.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
13182 Message-ID: <013c01c435fd$065a8490$c133673e@ysar>
13183
13184 so this is was the error of ircd yeap when i try to make msg command
13185 everything is goes ok with ircservices but!! with /nickserv /chanserv etc
13186 the error the irc server is down try later the version is bahamut-1.4(36)p2.
13187 irc.athensweb.gr CiIY TS5ow-r[RELEASE] and the services 5.0.0
13188 ----- Original Message -----
13189 From: "Yusuf Iskenderoglu" <uhc0@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
13190 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13191 Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:11 PM
13192 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] error
13193
13194
13195 > It might be, that the SERVICES_NAME definition of your ircd does not
13196 > match to the name of the services server you have chosen, causing
13197 > commands like
13198 > /nickserv
13199 > /chanserv not work.
13200 >
13201 > If you tell us which version of the ircd and services you are running,
13202 > we might help further.
13203 >
13204 > Regards;
13205 > y.
13206 >
13207 > On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 20:22, john sarantopoulos wrote:
13208 > > after full installation and start of services when i had going inside
13209 > > the client to make tests the answer is was :
13210 > > Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try
13211 > > again.
13212 > >
13213 > > but in my system is running both ircd and ircservices so in this case
13214 > > with get this error ?
13215 > >
13216 > >
13217 > > ______________________________________________________________________
13218 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13219 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13220 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13221 >
13222 >
13223 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13224 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13225 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13226 >
13227 >
13228
13229
13230
13231
13232 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Sun May 9 13:25:33 2004
13233 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
13234 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13235 Subject: [IRCServices] error
13236 In-Reply-To: <013c01c435fd$065a8490$c133673e@ysar>
13237 References: <011501c435f2$88fcc080$c133673e@ysar>
13238 <1084129863.6643.1.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
13239 <013c01c435fd$065a8490$c133673e@ysar>
13240 Message-ID: <1084134333.6644.6.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
13241
13242 Hi,
13243
13244 Please upgrade your services immediately, 5.0.0 is far too old. The
13245 latest release is 5.0.31
13246
13247 Moreover, RTFM and discover that Bahamut versions 1.4.34 and later are
13248 not supported, you either downgrade your ircd, or switch to another
13249 server software, consider the alternatives listed in section 2.1 of
13250 ircservices manual.
13251
13252 And last, the "services_name" definition inside options {} section of
13253 the ircd.conf of Bahamut is the solution to your case; that name must
13254 match the name of your services server.
13255
13256 Regards;
13257 yusuf.
13258
13259 On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 21:37, john sarantopoulos wrote:
13260 > so this is was the error of ircd yeap when i try to make msg command
13261 > everything is goes ok with ircservices but!! with /nickserv /chanserv etc
13262 > the error the irc server is down try later the version is bahamut-1.4(36)p2.
13263 > irc.athensweb.gr CiIY TS5ow-r[RELEASE] and the services 5.0.0
13264 > ----- Original Message -----
13265 > From: "Yusuf Iskenderoglu" <uhc0@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
13266 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13267 > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:11 PM
13268 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] error
13269 >
13270 >
13271 > > It might be, that the SERVICES_NAME definition of your ircd does not
13272 > > match to the name of the services server you have chosen, causing
13273 > > commands like
13274 > > /nickserv
13275 > > /chanserv not work.
13276 > >
13277 > > If you tell us which version of the ircd and services you are running,
13278 > > we might help further.
13279 > >
13280 > > Regards;
13281 > > y.
13282 > >
13283 > > On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 20:22, john sarantopoulos wrote:
13284 > > > after full installation and start of services when i had going inside
13285 > > > the client to make tests the answer is was :
13286 > > > Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try
13287 > > > again.
13288 > > >
13289 > > > but in my system is running both ircd and ircservices so in this case
13290 > > > with get this error ?
13291 > > >
13292 > > >
13293 > > > ______________________________________________________________________
13294 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13295 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13296 > > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13297 > >
13298 > >
13299 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13300 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13301 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13302 > >
13303 > >
13304 >
13305 >
13306 >
13307 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13308 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13309 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13310 >
13311
13312
13313
13314 From moontan at dmbroadband.com Sun May 9 18:01:58 2004
13315 From: moontan at dmbroadband.com (moontan@dmbroadband.com)
13316 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13317 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: IRCServices Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5
13318 In-Reply-To: <20040509100103.881A571998@dm.deskmedia.com>
13319 References: <20040509100103.881A571998@dm.deskmedia.com>
13320 Message-ID: <20040510003422.M89809@deskmedia.com>
13321
13322 I am having a logging problem, as in large size services log.this is the
13323 only thing in the log: "[May 04 19:05:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0):
13324 size (32768) <= wlen (-31838)
13325 [May 04 19:05:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (32768) <= wlen (-
13326 31838)"
13327 The log is full of that. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
13328
13329 --
13330 Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
13331
13332
13333 ---------- Original Message -----------
13334 From: ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
13335 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
13336 Sent: Sun, 9 May 2004 05:01:03 -0500 (CDT)
13337 Subject: IRCServices Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5
13338
13339 > Send IRCServices mailing list submissions to
13340 > ircservices@ircservices.za.net
13341 >
13342 > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
13343 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13344 > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
13345 > ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
13346 >
13347 > You can reach the person managing the list at
13348 > ircservices-owner@ircservices.za.net
13349 >
13350 > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
13351 > than "Re: Contents of IRCServices digest..."
13352 >
13353 > Today's Topics:
13354 >
13355 > 1. Unreal Bug? (Craig Edwards)
13356 > 2. Fw: Unreal Bug? (Craig Edwards)
13357 > 3. Re: Unreal Bug? (Andrew Church)
13358 > 4. Re: Fw: Unreal Bug? (Andrew Church)
13359 >
13360 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
13361 >
13362 > Message: 1
13363 > Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 18:53:31 +0100
13364 > From: "Craig Edwards" <brain@winbot.co.uk>
13365 > Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal Bug?
13366 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis"
13367 > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13368 > Message-ID: <200405081753.i48HrW125705@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
13369 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
13370 >
13371 > Hi
13372 >
13373 > When looking through the code for ircservices, i noticed that it
13374 > doesnt list usermode +R (only registered users may message the
13375 > nickname) in its list of extra modes supported by unrealircd (in
13376 > modules/protocol/unreal.c). Should this be implemented as it is a
13377 > known usermode to unreal, and it seems that services is blissfully
13378 > unaware of its presence.
13379 >
13380 > Thanks,
13381 > Brain
13382 >
13383 > ------------------------------
13384 >
13385 > Message: 2
13386 > Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 18:57:14 +0100
13387 > From: "Craig Edwards" <brain@winbot.co.uk>
13388 > Subject: [IRCServices] Fw: Unreal Bug?
13389 > To: "ircservices" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13390 > Message-ID: <200405081757.i48HvE125756@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
13391 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
13392 >
13393 > Followup: This appears to be a bug, verified by the fact that other
13394 > ircds which support +R have a matching definition in the protocol
13395 > module, whereas unreal doesnt. Example from grepping the
13396 > modules/protocol dir:
13397 >
13398 > modules/protocol/ptlink.c: {'R', {0x00008000}}, /* Allow
13399 > PRIVMSGs from +r clients only */
13400 >
13401 > >Hi
13402 > >
13403 > >When looking through the code for ircservices, i noticed that it doesnt
13404 list usermode +R (only registered users may >message the nickname) in its
13405 list of extra modes supported by unrealircd (in modules/protocol/unreal.c).
13406 Should this be >implemented as it is a known usermode to unreal, and it
13407 seems that services is blissfully unaware of its presence.
13408 > >
13409 > >Thanks,
13410 > >Brain
13411 >
13412 > ------------------------------
13413 >
13414 > Message: 3
13415 > Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 10:33:23 JST
13416 > From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13417 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Unreal Bug?
13418 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
13419 > Message-ID: <409d8a7a.50614@achurch.org>
13420 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
13421 >
13422 > >When looking through the code for ircservices, i noticed that it doesnt
13423 list usermode +R (only registered users may message the nickname) in its
13424 list of extra modes supported by unrealircd (in modules/protocol/unreal.c).
13425 Should this be implemented as it is a known usermode to unreal, and it seems
13426 that services is blissfully unaware of its presence.
13427 >
13428 > This is not a mode Services needs to be aware of, hence it's not
13429 > listed in the mode table.
13430 >
13431 > --Andrew Church
13432 > achurch@achurch.org
13433 > http://achurch.org/
13434 >
13435 > ------------------------------
13436 >
13437 > Message: 4
13438 > Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 10:35:14 JST
13439 > From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13440 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Fw: Unreal Bug?
13441 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
13442 > Message-ID: <409d8af0.50627@achurch.org>
13443 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
13444 >
13445 > >Followup: This appears to be a bug, verified by the fact that other ircds
13446 which support +R have a matching definition in the protocol module, whereas
13447 unreal doesnt. Example from grepping the modules/protocol dir:
13448 > >
13449 > >modules/protocol/ptlink.c: {'R', {0x00008000}}, /* Allow PRIVMSGs
13450 from +r clients only */
13451 >
13452 > I probably put that in just to remind myself it exists, since I
13453 > use PTlink less often than Unreal (read: never).
13454 >
13455 > --Andrew Church
13456 > achurch@achurch.org
13457 > http://achurch.org/
13458 >
13459 > ------------------------------
13460 >
13461 > _______________________________________________
13462 > IRCServices mailing list
13463 > IRCServices@ircservices.za.net
13464 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13465 >
13466 > End of IRCServices Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5
13467 > ******************************************
13468 ------- End of Original Message -------
13469
13470
13471
13472 From achurch at achurch.org Mon May 10 10:29:31 2004
13473 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13474 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13475 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: IRCServices Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5
13476 In-Reply-To: <20040510003422.M89809@deskmedia.com>
13477 Message-ID: <409edb39.52160@achurch.org>
13478
13479 >I am having a logging problem, as in large size services log.this is the
13480 >only thing in the log: "[May 04 19:05:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0):
13481 >size (32768) <= wlen (-31838)
13482 >[May 04 19:05:46 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(0): size (32768) <= wlen (-
13483 >31838)"
13484 >The log is full of that. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
13485
13486 Version?
13487
13488 --Andrew Church
13489 achurch@achurch.org
13490 http://achurch.org/
13491
13492
13493 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Mon May 10 01:55:21 2004
13494 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13495 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13496 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv prob
13497 Message-ID: <017801c4366c$88eae5c0$c133673e@ysar>
13498
13499 when i am use /chanserv /nickserv and memoserv all is ok but with operserv and help serv am getting this error through client :
13500 OperServ :Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try again.
13501
13502 my versions of are :
13503
13504 ircd :
13505
13506 bahamut-1.4(36)p2. irc.athensweb.gr :CHiIY TS5ow-r[RELEASE]
13507
13508 services :
13509
13510 ircservices 5.0.0.31
13511
13512 any solution ?
13513
13514
13515 -------------- next part --------------
13516 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
13517 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040510/6b99cede/attachment.htm
13518 From profound at eyerc.net Mon May 10 02:28:41 2004
13519 From: profound at eyerc.net (Profound)
13520 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13521 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv prob
13522 References: <017801c4366c$88eae5c0$c133673e@ysar>
13523 Message-ID: <002701c43671$35fbdf40$0300a8c0@mothership>
13524
13525 Hi John,
13526
13527 Where you modified the value of SERVICES_NAME you need to modify the value of STATS_NAME. Make it equal to whatever SERVICES_NAME is set to.
13528
13529 Regards,
13530 Tim Owen
13531
13532 Profound @ EYErc.net
13533 www.EYErc.net
13534 ----- Original Message -----
13535 From: john sarantopoulos
13536 To: ircservices
13537 Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 6:25 PM
13538 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv prob
13539
13540
13541 when i am use /chanserv /nickserv and memoserv all is ok but with operserv and help serv am getting this error through client :
13542 OperServ :Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try again.
13543
13544 my versions of are :
13545
13546 ircd :
13547
13548 bahamut-1.4(36)p2. irc.athensweb.gr :CHiIY TS5ow-r[RELEASE]
13549
13550 services :
13551
13552 ircservices 5.0.0.31
13553
13554 any solution ?
13555
13556
13557
13558
13559
13560 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13561
13562
13563 ------------------------------------------------------------------
13564 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13565 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13566 -------------- next part --------------
13567 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
13568 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040510/8250ce51/attachment.html
13569 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Mon May 10 02:39:20 2004
13570 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13571 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13572 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv prob
13573 References: <017801c4366c$88eae5c0$c133673e@ysar>
13574 <002701c43671$35fbdf40$0300a8c0@mothership>
13575 Message-ID: <01b001c43672$abdf5b50$c133673e@ysar>
13576
13577 thanks man :)
13578
13579 ----- Original Message -----
13580 From: Profound
13581 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
13582 Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 12:28 PM
13583 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] operserv prob
13584
13585
13586 Hi John,
13587
13588 Where you modified the value of SERVICES_NAME you need to modify the value of STATS_NAME. Make it equal to whatever SERVICES_NAME is set to.
13589
13590 Regards,
13591 Tim Owen
13592
13593 Profound @ EYErc.net
13594 www.EYErc.net
13595 ----- Original Message -----
13596 From: john sarantopoulos
13597 To: ircservices
13598 Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 6:25 PM
13599 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv prob
13600
13601
13602 when i am use /chanserv /nickserv and memoserv all is ok but with operserv and help serv am getting this error through client :
13603 OperServ :Services is currently down. Please wait a few moments, and then try again.
13604
13605 my versions of are :
13606
13607 ircd :
13608
13609 bahamut-1.4(36)p2. irc.athensweb.gr :CHiIY TS5ow-r[RELEASE]
13610
13611 services :
13612
13613 ircservices 5.0.0.31
13614
13615 any solution ?
13616
13617
13618
13619
13620
13621 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
13622
13623
13624 ------------------------------------------------------------------
13625 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13626 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13627
13628
13629
13630 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13631
13632
13633 ------------------------------------------------------------------
13634 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13635 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13636 -------------- next part --------------
13637 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
13638 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040510/4fcec4b2/attachment.htm
13639 From us44ever at hotmail.com Mon May 10 12:01:04 2004
13640 From: us44ever at hotmail.com (us44ever .)
13641 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13642 Subject: [IRCServices] error while installing
13643 Message-ID: <Sea1-F65qWmm8huCIHk0000a6a4@hotmail.com>
13644
13645 hi,
13646 i get this error while trying to upgrade (when using gmake):
13647
13648 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31'
13649 gcc -rdynamic convert-db.o convert-cygnus.o convert-epona.o convert-magick.o
13650 convert-ptlink.o convert-sirv.o convert-trircd.o convert-ver8.o fileutil-x.o
13651 suspinfo-x.o xml-export-x.o ../compat.o -o convert-db
13652 convert-trircd.o: In function `trircd_load_ajoin':
13653 /usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31/tools/convert-trircd.c:215: undefined
13654 reference to `ngi_mainnick'
13655 gmake[1]: *** [convert-db] Error 1
13656 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31/tools'
13657 gmake: *** [tools] Error 2
13658 -
13659 net93-david# gcc -v
13660 Using builtin specs.
13661 gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD]
13662 -
13663
13664 anyone can help please?
13665
13666 _________________________________________________________________
13667 Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN
13668 Premium!
13669 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/mlb&pgmarket=en-us/go/onm00200439ave/direct/01/
13670
13671
13672
13673 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Mon May 10 13:28:47 2004
13674 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13675 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13676 Subject: [IRCServices] ...
13677 Message-ID: <01d501c436cd$661def90$c133673e@ysar>
13678
13679 two thinks ...
13680
13681 1 , when starts the mirc at the main chanel the first say up there dalnet how i can change to any other name ?
13682 2 , the command identify for nickserv can be changed to id for smaller use of users ?
13683
13684 thanks
13685 -------------- next part --------------
13686 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
13687 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040510/c72a8e4c/attachment.html
13688 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Mon May 10 13:33:15 2004
13689 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13690 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13691 Subject: [IRCServices] expire time
13692 Message-ID: <01e301c436ce$05fce840$c133673e@ysar>
13693
13694 when one user log in the server the services is giving the message about identify but if the user is not give the identification the system is not set the user to guestXXX
13695
13696 how i can fix this prob !?
13697 -------------- next part --------------
13698 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
13699 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040510/809615c5/attachment.htm
13700 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 10 14:04:03 2004
13701 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
13702 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13703 Subject: [IRCServices] ...
13704 Message-ID: <mailman.48.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13705
13706 The first issue is IRCd related, Not Services.
13707
13708 This second one is possible, but with modifications of the source. if you have experiance with C, you can edit the command table in nickserv/main.c but remember, if you make this modification, any other bugs you find wont be supported. (if you are using Unreal3.2 theres a chance you can use some clever regexps to allow for an 'id' command like that, although i wont help with this, and i cant garuntee it)
13709
13710 And with regards to your other issue, make sure NSForceNickChange is specified in your modules.conf
13711
13712 /****************************************
13713 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
13714 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
13715 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
13716 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
13717 ****************************************/
13718
13719
13720 /****************************************
13721 * From - john sarantopoulos <ysar68@otenet.gr>
13722 * To - ircservices <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13723 * Sent - 2004-05-10 21:28:47
13724 * Subject - [IRCServices] ...
13725 ****************************************/
13726
13727 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
13728
13729 >two thinks ...
13730 >
13731 >1 , when starts the mirc at the main chanel the first say up there dalnet how i can change to any other name ?
13732 >2 , the command identify for nickserv can be changed to id for smaller use of users ?
13733 >
13734 >thanks
13735 >------------------------------------------------------------------
13736 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13737 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13738 >
13739
13740 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
13741
13742
13743
13744
13745 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Mon May 10 14:30:03 2004
13746 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13747 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13748 Subject: [IRCServices] ...
13749 References: <200405102101.i4AL1jpO011987@thalia.otenet.gr>
13750 Message-ID: <021801c436d5$f53fce70$c133673e@ysar>
13751
13752 ok i have changed and all is ok in execute of /nickserv id password , so i
13753 must change also in help not show /nickserv identify password but /nickserv
13754 id password to use the user the correct case if user read the help
13755
13756 thanks
13757
13758 ----- Original Message -----
13759 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
13760 To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13761 Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 12:04 AM
13762 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] ...
13763
13764
13765 > The first issue is IRCd related, Not Services.
13766 >
13767 > This second one is possible, but with modifications of the source. if you
13768 have experiance with C, you can edit the command table in nickserv/main.c
13769 but remember, if you make this modification, any other bugs you find wont be
13770 supported. (if you are using Unreal3.2 theres a chance you can use some
13771 clever regexps to allow for an 'id' command like that, although i wont help
13772 with this, and i cant garuntee it)
13773 >
13774 > And with regards to your other issue, make sure NSForceNickChange is
13775 specified in your modules.conf
13776 >
13777 > /****************************************
13778 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
13779 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
13780 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
13781 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
13782 > ****************************************/
13783 >
13784 >
13785 > /****************************************
13786 > * From - john sarantopoulos <ysar68@otenet.gr>
13787 > * To - ircservices <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13788 > * Sent - 2004-05-10 21:28:47
13789 > * Subject - [IRCServices] ...
13790 > ****************************************/
13791 >
13792 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
13793 >
13794 > >two thinks ...
13795 > >
13796 > >1 , when starts the mirc at the main chanel the first say up there dalnet
13797 how i can change to any other name ?
13798 > >2 , the command identify for nickserv can be changed to id for smaller
13799 use of users ?
13800 > >
13801 > >thanks
13802 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
13803 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13804 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13805 > >
13806 >
13807 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
13808 >
13809 >
13810 >
13811 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13812 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13813 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13814 >
13815 >
13816
13817
13818
13819
13820 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 10 14:49:26 2004
13821 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
13822 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13823 Subject: [IRCServices] ...
13824 Message-ID: <mailman.49.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13825
13826 This information is stored in the Language files.
13827
13828 These files are located in ircservices-5.0.xx/lang/*.l
13829
13830 You will need to look through these, and make the required changes.
13831
13832 /****************************************
13833 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
13834 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
13835 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
13836 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
13837 ****************************************/
13838
13839
13840 /****************************************
13841 * From - john sarantopoulos <ysar68@otenet.gr>
13842 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13843 * Sent - 2004-05-10 22:30:03
13844 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] ...
13845 ****************************************/
13846
13847 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
13848
13849 >ok i have changed and all is ok in execute of /nickserv id password , so i
13850 >must change also in help not show /nickserv identify password but /nickserv
13851 >id password to use the user the correct case if user read the help
13852 >
13853 >thanks
13854 >
13855 >----- Original Message -----
13856 >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
13857 >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13858 >Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 12:04 AM
13859 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] ...
13860 >
13861 >
13862 >> The first issue is IRCd related, Not Services.
13863 >>
13864 >> This second one is possible, but with modifications of the source. if you
13865 >have experiance with C, you can edit the command table in nickserv/main.c
13866 >but remember, if you make this modification, any other bugs you find wont be
13867 >supported. (if you are using Unreal3.2 theres a chance you can use some
13868 >clever regexps to allow for an 'id' command like that, although i wont help
13869 >with this, and i cant garuntee it)
13870 >>
13871 >> And with regards to your other issue, make sure NSForceNickChange is
13872 >specified in your modules.conf
13873 >>
13874 >> /****************************************
13875 >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
13876 >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
13877 >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
13878 >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
13879 >> ****************************************/
13880 >>
13881 >>
13882 >> /****************************************
13883 >> * From - john sarantopoulos <ysar68@otenet.gr>
13884 >> * To - ircservices <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13885 >> * Sent - 2004-05-10 21:28:47
13886 >> * Subject - [IRCServices] ...
13887 >> ****************************************/
13888 >>
13889 >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
13890 >>
13891 >> >two thinks ...
13892 >> >
13893 >> >1 , when starts the mirc at the main chanel the first say up there dalnet
13894 >how i can change to any other name ?
13895 >> >2 , the command identify for nickserv can be changed to id for smaller
13896 >use of users ?
13897 >> >
13898 >> >thanks
13899 >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
13900 >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13901 >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13902 >> >
13903 >>
13904 >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
13905 >>
13906 >>
13907 >>
13908 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
13909 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13910 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13911 >>
13912 >>
13913 >
13914 >
13915 >
13916 >------------------------------------------------------------------
13917 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13918 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13919 >.
13920
13921 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
13922
13923
13924
13925
13926 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Mon May 10 17:08:28 2004
13927 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
13928 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13929 Subject: [IRCServices] languge
13930 Message-ID: <027301c436ec$16773770$c133673e@ysar>
13931
13932 if i want to translate on of this to other languange not included in list and after put it in list as example copy the en_us.l to gr.l and translate it to greek lang how i can do it this ? and after to put it to list of the languanges ?
13933 -------------- next part --------------
13934 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
13935 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040511/93751cc6/attachment.html
13936 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 11 09:16:57 2004
13937 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13938 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13939 Subject: [IRCServices] error while installing
13940 In-Reply-To: <Sea1-F65qWmm8huCIHk0000a6a4@hotmail.com>
13941 Message-ID: <40a01ba2.62422@achurch.org>
13942
13943 >convert-trircd.o: In function `trircd_load_ajoin':
13944 >/usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31/tools/convert-trircd.c:215: undefined
13945 >reference to `ngi_mainnick'
13946
13947 Try again with unmodified sources.
13948
13949 --Andrew Church
13950 achurch@achurch.org
13951 http://achurch.org/
13952
13953
13954 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 10 17:41:04 2004
13955 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
13956 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:07 2004
13957 Subject: [IRCServices] languge
13958 Message-ID: <mailman.50.1098597727.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13959
13960 Basically, rename an 'existing' language file to the name of your new language, translate it, Send it to Andy to see if he will add it to the main services distribution, edit language.c, perform a make and make install, then restart services.
13961
13962 This should put your language into services :)
13963
13964 As a note, remember to read the notes at the top of the language you are going to translate from.
13965
13966 /****************************************
13967 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
13968 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
13969 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
13970 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
13971 ****************************************/
13972
13973
13974 /****************************************
13975 * From - john sarantopoulos <ysar68@otenet.gr>
13976 * To - ircservices <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13977 * Sent - 2004-05-11 01:08:28
13978 * Subject - [IRCServices] languge
13979 ****************************************/
13980
13981 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
13982
13983 >if i want to translate on of this to other languange not included in list and after put it in list as example copy the en_us.l to gr.l and translate it to greek lang how i can do it this ? and after to put it to list of the languanges ?
13984 >------------------------------------------------------------------
13985 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13986 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13987 >
13988
13989 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
13990
13991
13992
13993
13994 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 10 17:43:56 2004
13995 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
13996 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
13997 Subject: [IRCServices] A Quick question about chanserv status..
13998 Message-ID: <mailman.51.1098597728.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
13999
14000 is it possible to have proper 'invalid' messages for this services function?
14001
14002 It can be slightly confusing to have services chuck things like:
14003
14004 STATUS ? ? ERROR Syntax error
14005 STATUS #chatspike Craig ERROR Nick not online
14006
14007 rather than the 'useful' messages (for example, a reminder of the syntax) which services normally gives out?
14008
14009 Thanks
14010
14011 /****************************************
14012 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
14013 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
14014 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
14015 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
14016 ****************************************/
14017
14018
14019
14020 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 11 10:00:57 2004
14021 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14022 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14023 Subject: [IRCServices] A Quick question about chanserv status..
14024 In-Reply-To: <40a0212d.44435@mail.achurch.org>
14025 Message-ID: <40a0260e.62452@achurch.org>
14026
14027 >is it possible to have proper 'invalid' messages for this services function?
14028 >
14029 >It can be slightly confusing to have services chuck things like:
14030 >
14031 >STATUS ? ? ERROR Syntax error
14032 >STATUS #chatspike Craig ERROR Nick not online
14033 >
14034 >rather than the 'useful' messages (for example, a reminder of the syntax) which services normally gives out?
14035
14036 The problem with this is that it would confuse bots trying to parse
14037 the message, which is what I see as the main use for this function.
14038
14039 --Andrew Church
14040 achurch@achurch.org
14041 http://achurch.org/
14042
14043
14044 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Mon May 10 18:22:02 2004
14045 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14046 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14047 Subject: [IRCServices] so here is the error
14048 Message-ID: <028d01c436f6$5d86b320$c133673e@ysar>
14049
14050 when i try to compile after add the language put this : form language.c
14051
14052
14053 /* Order in which languages should be displayed: (alphabetical) */
14054 static int langorder[] = {
14055 LANG_EN_US, /* English (US) */
14056 LANG_NL, /* Dutch */
14057 LANG_FR, /* French */
14058 LANG_DE, /* German */
14059 LANG_HU, /* Hungarian */
14060 LANG_IT, /* Italian */
14061 /* LANG_JA_JIS,*/ /* Japanese (JIS encoding) */
14062 LANG_JA_EUC, /* Japanese (EUC encoding) */
14063 LANG_JA_SJIS, /* Japanese (SJIS encoding) */
14064 LANG_PT, /* Portugese */
14065 LANG_ES, /* Spanish */
14066 LANG_TR, /* Turkish */
14067 LANG_GR, /* Greek */
14068 };
14069
14070 /* Filenames for language files: */
14071 static struct {
14072 int num;
14073 const char *filename;
14074 } filenames[] = {
14075 { LANG_EN_US, "en_us" },
14076 { LANG_NL, "nl" },
14077 { LANG_FR, "fr" },
14078 { LANG_DE, "de" },
14079 { LANG_HU, "hu" },
14080 { LANG_IT, "it" },
14081 /* { LANG_JA_JIS, "ja_jis" },*/
14082 { LANG_JA_EUC, "ja_euc" },
14083 { LANG_JA_SJIS, "ja_sjis" },
14084 { LANG_PT, "pt" },
14085 { LANG_ES, "es" },
14086 { LANG_TR, "tr" },
14087 { LANG_GR "gr" },
14088 { -1, NULL }
14089 };
14090
14091 and from language.h this :
14092
14093 #define LANG_EN_US 0 /* United States English */
14094 #define LANG_UNUSED1 1 /* Unused; was Japanese (JIS encoding) */
14095 #define LANG_JA_EUC 2 /* Japanese (EUC encoding) */
14096 #define LANG_JA_SJIS 3 /* Japanese (SJIS encoding) */
14097 #define LANG_ES 4 /* Spanish */
14098 #define LANG_PT 5 /* Portugese */
14099 #define LANG_FR 6 /* French */
14100 #define LANG_TR 7 /* Turkish */
14101 #define LANG_IT 8 /* Italian */
14102 #define LANG_DE 9 /* German */
14103 #define LANG_NL 10 /* Dutch */
14104 #define LANG_HU 11 /* Hungarian */
14105 #define LANG_GR 12 /* Greek */
14106
14107 #define NUM_LANGS 13 /* Number of languages */
14108 #define LANG_DEFAULT -1 /* "Use the default" setting */
14109
14110 i get this error in compile
14111
14112 ake
14113 make -C lang langstrs.h
14114 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/irc/ircservices-5.0.31/lang'
14115 Generating langstrs.h... 1204 strings
14116 langstrs.h unchanged
14117 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/irc/ircservices-5.0.31/lang'
14118 gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log -c language.c -o language.o
14119 language.c:60: parse error before string constant
14120 make: *** [language.o] Error 1
14121
14122 what i have to do for find the solution and compile?
14123 -------------- next part --------------
14124 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
14125 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040511/e40fd6ee/attachment.htm
14126 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 10 19:07:15 2004
14127 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
14128 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14129 Subject: [IRCServices] so here is the error
14130 Message-ID: <mailman.52.1098597728.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14131
14132 Its probably related to this line:
14133
14134 { LANG_GR "gr" },
14135
14136 you are missing a , so it should read:
14137
14138 { LANG_GR, "gr" },
14139
14140 If that doesnt fix it, i'm not sure what would.
14141
14142 /****************************************
14143 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
14144 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
14145 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
14146 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
14147 ****************************************/
14148
14149
14150 /****************************************
14151 * From - john sarantopoulos <ysar68@otenet.gr>
14152 * To - ircservices <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14153 * Sent - 2004-05-11 02:22:02
14154 * Subject - [IRCServices] so here is the error
14155 ****************************************/
14156
14157 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
14158
14159 >when i try to compile after add the language put this : form language.c
14160 >
14161 >
14162 >/* Order in which languages should be displayed: (alphabetical) */
14163 >static int langorder[] = {
14164 > LANG_EN_US, /* English (US) */
14165 > LANG_NL, /* Dutch */
14166 > LANG_FR, /* French */
14167 > LANG_DE, /* German */
14168 > LANG_HU, /* Hungarian */
14169 > LANG_IT, /* Italian */
14170 >/* LANG_JA_JIS,*/ /* Japanese (JIS encoding) */
14171 > LANG_JA_EUC, /* Japanese (EUC encoding) */
14172 > LANG_JA_SJIS, /* Japanese (SJIS encoding) */
14173 > LANG_PT, /* Portugese */
14174 > LANG_ES, /* Spanish */
14175 > LANG_TR, /* Turkish */
14176 > LANG_GR, /* Greek */
14177 >};
14178 >
14179 >/* Filenames for language files: */
14180 >static struct {
14181 > int num;
14182 > const char *filename;
14183 >} filenames[] = {
14184 > { LANG_EN_US, "en_us" },
14185 > { LANG_NL, "nl" },
14186 > { LANG_FR, "fr" },
14187 > { LANG_DE, "de" },
14188 > { LANG_HU, "hu" },
14189 > { LANG_IT, "it" },
14190 >/* { LANG_JA_JIS, "ja_jis" },*/
14191 > { LANG_JA_EUC, "ja_euc" },
14192 > { LANG_JA_SJIS, "ja_sjis" },
14193 > { LANG_PT, "pt" },
14194 > { LANG_ES, "es" },
14195 > { LANG_TR, "tr" },
14196 > { LANG_GR "gr" },
14197 > { -1, NULL }
14198 >};
14199 >
14200 >and from language.h this :
14201 >
14202 >#define LANG_EN_US 0 /* United States English */
14203 >#define LANG_UNUSED1 1 /* Unused; was Japanese (JIS encoding) */
14204 >#define LANG_JA_EUC 2 /* Japanese (EUC encoding) */
14205 >#define LANG_JA_SJIS 3 /* Japanese (SJIS encoding) */
14206 >#define LANG_ES 4 /* Spanish */
14207 >#define LANG_PT 5 /* Portugese */
14208 >#define LANG_FR 6 /* French */
14209 >#define LANG_TR 7 /* Turkish */
14210 >#define LANG_IT 8 /* Italian */
14211 >#define LANG_DE 9 /* German */
14212 >#define LANG_NL 10 /* Dutch */
14213 >#define LANG_HU 11 /* Hungarian */
14214 >#define LANG_GR 12 /* Greek */
14215 >
14216 >#define NUM_LANGS 13 /* Number of languages */
14217 >#define LANG_DEFAULT -1 /* "Use the default" setting */
14218 >
14219 >i get this error in compile
14220 >
14221 >ake
14222 >make -C lang langstrs.h
14223 >make[1]: Entering directory `/home/irc/ircservices-5.0.31/lang'
14224 >Generating langstrs.h... 1204 strings
14225 >langstrs.h unchanged
14226 >make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/irc/ircservices-5.0.31/lang'
14227 >gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log -c language.c -o language.o
14228 >language.c:60: parse error before string constant
14229 >make: *** [language.o] Error 1
14230 >
14231 >what i have to do for find the solution and compile?
14232 >------------------------------------------------------------------
14233 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14234 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14235 >
14236
14237 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
14238
14239
14240
14241
14242 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Tue May 11 01:21:05 2004
14243 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14244 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14245 Subject: [IRCServices] network split!
14246 Message-ID: <02a101c43730$e85503a0$c133673e@ysar>
14247
14248 when the ircd server is connected with ircservices , and join in a new unregistered channel they dont giving a op status autmaticaly , and back in main window gives this error message :
14249 -irc.athensweb.gr- *** Notice -- Due to a network split, you can not obtain channel operator status in a new channel at this time.
14250
14251 so why network split if is connected both!?
14252 i had make /nickserv help and /chanserv help and response
14253 i have to change again something inside the config files?
14254
14255 thanks
14256 john sarantopoulos
14257 -------------- next part --------------
14258 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
14259 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040511/51f8d669/attachment.html
14260 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Tue May 11 01:52:33 2004
14261 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14262 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14263 Subject: [IRCServices] ok the compile! but!
14264 Message-ID: <02b601c43735$4e3ecf30$c133673e@ysar>
14265
14266 ok with the compile is not stop after i have put the , bud i try to select language 12 in nickserv and tell me is not existing why ? i fix the error the compile made all also the installation
14267
14268 -------------- next part --------------
14269 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
14270 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040511/950974b6/attachment.htm
14271 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Tue May 11 02:21:53 2004
14272 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14273 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14274 Subject: [IRCServices] Fw: ok the compile! but!
14275 Message-ID: <032701c43739$671046c0$c133673e@ysar>
14276
14277
14278
14279
14280
14281 ok with the compile is not stop after i have put the language strings and files , bud i try to select language 12 in nickserv and tell me is not existing why and is not existing in list of help in language chosing help ? i fix the with "," made make and made install finish normal !
14282 -------------- next part --------------
14283 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
14284 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040511/9cc462e0/attachment.html
14285 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue May 11 03:03:08 2004
14286 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
14287 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14288 Subject: [IRCServices] Locked Channel Modes
14289 Message-ID: <20040511100308.39592.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14290
14291 Unreal IRCD supports this feature:
14292 set::restrict-channelmodes <modes>
14293 to restrict users to set/unset the specific
14294 channelmodes.
14295
14296 But MLOCK command overrides this feature (U:line)..
14297 Can be implemented a feature to not allow users from
14298 mlock these modes?
14299
14300 =====
14301 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
14302
14303
14304
14305 From medice at gmx.at Tue May 11 03:16:27 2004
14306 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
14307 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14308 Subject: [IRCServices] Locked Channel Modes
14309 In-Reply-To: <20040511100308.39592.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14310 References: <20040511100308.39592.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14311 Message-ID: <40A0A7FB.1040705@gmx.at>
14312
14313 well, this sounds indeed reasonable, maybe a config-parameter at
14314 services which can be set equal zu ircds setting...
14315
14316 greetz
14317 /medice
14318
14319 Dionisios K. wrote:
14320 > Unreal IRCD supports this feature:
14321 > set::restrict-channelmodes <modes>
14322 > to restrict users to set/unset the specific
14323 > channelmodes.
14324 >
14325 > But MLOCK command overrides this feature (U:line)..
14326 > Can be implemented a feature to not allow users from
14327 > mlock these modes?
14328 >
14329 > =====
14330 > Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
14331 >
14332 >
14333 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14334 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14335 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14336 >
14337 >
14338
14339
14340
14341 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 11 23:20:22 2004
14342 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14343 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14344 Subject: [IRCServices] Locked Channel Modes
14345 In-Reply-To: <20040511100308.39592.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14346 Message-ID: <40a0e156.06441@achurch.org>
14347
14348 >Unreal IRCD supports this feature:
14349 >set::restrict-channelmodes <modes>
14350 >to restrict users to set/unset the specific
14351 >channelmodes.
14352 >
14353 >But MLOCK command overrides this feature (U:line)..
14354 >Can be implemented a feature to not allow users from
14355 >mlock these modes?
14356
14357 This is under consideration for a future version, but will not be
14358 added to 5.0.
14359
14360 --Andrew Church
14361 achurch@achurch.org
14362 http://achurch.org/
14363
14364
14365 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Tue May 11 08:55:15 2004
14366 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14367 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14368 Subject: [IRCServices] prob
14369 Message-ID: <004201c43770$5a7c58e0$c133673e@ysar>
14370
14371
14372 when the client is running in main window before all channels says DALnet , where in source i can change to my name so if can't help me what is the right one address for ircd servers help ?
14373 -------------- next part --------------
14374 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
14375 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040511/f2d5104a/attachment.htm
14376 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue May 11 10:53:37 2004
14377 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
14378 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14379 Subject: [IRCServices] prob
14380 Message-ID: <20040511175337.13068.qmail@web86404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14381
14382 If you are using unreal www.Unrealircd.com and if you
14383 are using Bahamut bahamut.dal.net
14384
14385 =====
14386 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
14387
14388
14389
14390 From azoff at se.linux.org Tue May 11 14:21:51 2004
14391 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
14392 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14393 Subject: [IRCServices] Bahamut 1.8.0
14394 Message-ID: <40A143EF.9070207@se.linux.org>
14395
14396 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
14397 Hash: SHA1
14398
14399 Hi
14400
14401 Just wanna tell you people out there that my upgrade to 1.8.0 worked
14402 well with latest ircservices. I haven't found anything broken yet.
14403
14404 Andrew, are you plaing to add this release to the "supported" list?
14405
14406
14407 Regards,
14408 - --
14409 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
14410 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
14411 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
14412 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
14413
14414 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14415 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
14416 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
14417
14418 iD8DBQFAoUPieY7jmtvbDP0RAoZmAJ9lK/d9xDGHJp1Qrv8mPfphLq4IggCgkVrD
14419 lnp9gCKKlMSRIqh1iGaG5N4=
14420 =YpkI
14421 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
14422
14423
14424 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Tue May 11 17:40:50 2004
14425 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14426 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14427 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices-chk
14428 Message-ID: <007f01c437b9$c63954e0$c133673e@ysar>
14429
14430 the ircservices-chk where i must install it to check the services if running to work ?
14431 -------------- next part --------------
14432 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
14433 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040512/54a0255d/attachment.html
14434 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Tue May 11 17:20:20 2004
14435 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14436 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14437 Subject: [IRCServices] reset by peer
14438 Message-ID: <007001c437b6$e99702a0$c133673e@ysar>
14439
14440 i leaved at night and after fwe 2 or 3 hours i find down the services with read error :
14441
14442 [May 11 23:18:16 2004] operserv/main: galois: set #linux -o galois
14443 [May 11 23:18:52 2004] operserv/main: galois: help
14444 [May 11 23:19:06 2004] operserv/main: galois: help commands
14445 [May 11 23:20:37 2004] operserv/main: galois: global foo
14446 [May 11 23:21:05 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
14447
14448 --
14449 This message has been scanned for viruses and
14450 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
14451 believed to be clean.
14452 MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
14453
14454 -------------- next part --------------
14455 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
14456 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040512/94dc4938/attachment.htm
14457 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue May 11 21:32:26 2004
14458 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
14459 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14460 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices-chk
14461 Message-ID: <20040512043226.3595.qmail@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14462
14463 To start services with this feature type ./ircservices-chk
14464
14465 =====
14466 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
14467
14468
14469
14470 From ysar68 at otenet.gr Wed May 12 00:20:58 2004
14471 From: ysar68 at otenet.gr (john sarantopoulos)
14472 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14473 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices-chk
14474 References: <20040512043226.3595.qmail@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14475 Message-ID: <00b601c437f1$be1e7690$c133673e@ysar>
14476
14477 yes i had use this command and after i make a check i drop by my self the
14478 services and is not restart
14479 ----- Original Message -----
14480 From: "Dionisios K." <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
14481 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14482 Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:32 AM
14483 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] ircservices-chk
14484
14485
14486 > To start services with this feature type ./ircservices-chk
14487 >
14488 > =====
14489 > Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
14490 >
14491 >
14492 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14493 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14494 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14495 >
14496 >
14497
14498
14499
14500
14501 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed May 12 03:58:33 2004
14502 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
14503 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14504 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices-chk
14505 In-Reply-To: <00b601c437f1$be1e7690$c133673e@ysar>
14506 Message-ID: <20040512105833.47960.qmail@web86407.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
14507
14508 Drop? what you mean?
14509 If you mean that you have terminate services... How?
14510
14511
14512 =====
14513 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
14514
14515
14516
14517 From tty at inbox.ru Wed May 12 10:42:05 2004
14518 From: tty at inbox.ru (=?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Alex HangMan=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?=)
14519 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14520 Subject: [IRCServices] nickserv: delay on LINK command
14521 Message-ID: <E1BNxk5-0001f5-00.tty-inbox-ru@f11.mail.ru>
14522
14523 Hello
14524
14525 I found, that LINK command have no delay between consecutive uses. This is the way to flood nickserv with this command and inflate size of database.
14526
14527 NSLinkMax doesn`t help since the attacker can register new nick and link nicks again.
14528
14529 ---
14530 wbr
14531
14532
14533 From us44ever at hotmail.com Wed May 12 13:08:23 2004
14534 From: us44ever at hotmail.com (us44ever .)
14535 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14536 Subject: [IRCServices] error while installing
14537 Message-ID: <Sea1-F803mexSR1IEDV0000f177@hotmail.com>
14538
14539 hi Andrew,
14540
14541 i didn't modify anything, it has been directly downloaded from
14542 ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ircservices-5.0.31.diff.gz
14543
14544
14545 >
14546 > >convert-trircd.o: In function `trircd_load_ajoin':
14547 > >/usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31/tools/convert-trircd.c:215: undefined
14548 > >reference to `ngi_mainnick'
14549 >
14550 > Try again with unmodified sources.
14551 >
14552 > --Andrew Church
14553 > achurch@achurch.org
14554 > http://achurch.org/
14555
14556 _________________________________________________________________
14557 FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar \96 get it now!
14558 http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
14559
14560
14561
14562 From achurch at achurch.org Thu May 13 09:17:20 2004
14563 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14564 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14565 Subject: [IRCServices] error while installing
14566 In-Reply-To: <Sea1-F803mexSR1IEDV0000f177@hotmail.com>
14567 Message-ID: <40a2beb4.77314@achurch.org>
14568
14569 Try again from the .tar file.
14570
14571 --Andrew Church
14572 achurch@achurch.org
14573 http://achurch.org/
14574
14575 >hi Andrew,
14576 >
14577 >i didn't modify anything, it has been directly downloaded from
14578 >ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ircservices-5.0.31.diff.gz
14579 >
14580 >
14581 >>
14582 >> >convert-trircd.o: In function `trircd_load_ajoin':
14583 >> >/usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31/tools/convert-trircd.c:215: undefined
14584 >> >reference to `ngi_mainnick'
14585 >>
14586 >> Try again with unmodified sources.
14587 >>
14588 >> --Andrew Church
14589 >> achurch@achurch.org
14590 >> http://achurch.org/
14591 >
14592 >_________________________________________________________________
14593 >FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ? get it now!
14594 >http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
14595 >
14596 >
14597 >------------------------------------------------------------------
14598 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14599 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14600
14601
14602 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed May 12 17:31:24 2004
14603 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
14604 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14605 Subject: [IRCServices] error while installing
14606 Message-ID: <mailman.53.1098597728.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14607
14608 I used this patch and it worked fine, not sure where your problem is coming from
14609
14610 /****************************************
14611 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
14612 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
14613 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
14614 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
14615 ****************************************/
14616
14617
14618 /****************************************
14619 * From - us44ever . <us44ever@hotmail.com>
14620 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14621 * Sent - 2004-05-12 21:08:23
14622 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] error while installing
14623 ****************************************/
14624
14625 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
14626
14627 >hi Andrew,
14628 >
14629 >i didn't modify anything, it has been directly downloaded from
14630 >ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ircservices-5.0.31.diff.gz
14631 >
14632 >
14633 >>
14634 >> >convert-trircd.o: In function `trircd_load_ajoin':
14635 >> >/usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31/tools/convert-trircd.c:215: undefined
14636 >> >reference to `ngi_mainnick'
14637 >>
14638 >> Try again with unmodified sources.
14639 >>
14640 >> --Andrew Church
14641 >> achurch@achurch.org
14642 >> http://achurch.org/
14643 >
14644 >_________________________________________________________________
14645 >FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ? get it now!
14646 >http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
14647 >
14648 >
14649 >------------------------------------------------------------------
14650 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14651 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14652 >.
14653
14654 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
14655
14656 From jon at jons.org Wed May 12 17:45:31 2004
14657 From: jon at jons.org (Jon Christopherson)
14658 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14659 Subject: [SPAM] Re: Re: [IRCServices] error while installing
14660 In-Reply-To: <20040513002910.5D3FF326BA6@mail2.zoneedit.com>
14661 Message-ID: <200405130046.i4D0kA67009913@mail.xelink.net>
14662
14663
14664 >I used this patch and it worked fine, not sure where your problem is coming
14665 >from
14666
14667 He probably patched already modified source. As long as the modified parts
14668 don't conflict with the patch set, it would still apply cleanly.
14669
14670 >
14671 >/****************************************
14672 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
14673 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
14674 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
14675 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
14676 > ****************************************/
14677
14678 -jon
14679
14680
14681
14682
14683 From achurch at achurch.org Thu May 13 18:13:08 2004
14684 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14685 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14686 Subject: [IRCServices] Advance warning for 5.0.32
14687 Message-ID: <40a33d50.06141@achurch.org>
14688
14689 Since Bahamut 1.8.0 has been released, I'm updating the Bahamut
14690 protocol module for Services 5.0.32. However, due to the difficulty of
14691 supporting both 1.8.0 and earlier versions simultaneously, support for
14692 earlier versions of Bahamut will be dropped completely in Services 5.0.32.
14693 Normally I wouldn't make such a precipitous change in a maintenance
14694 release, but given that the current module only supports older versions,
14695 and that those older versions reportedly have a number of fairly major
14696 bugs, I think it's reasonable in this case.
14697
14698 In summary: If you're running Bahamut, you'll have to upgrade all of
14699 your servers to 1.8.0 before you can use Services 5.0.32.
14700
14701 --Andrew Church
14702 achurch@achurch.org
14703 http://achurch.org/
14704
14705
14706 From azoff at se.linux.org Thu May 13 04:22:11 2004
14707 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?iso-8859-1?b?VG9yYmr2cm4=?= Svensson)
14708 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14709 Subject: [IRCServices] Advance warning for 5.0.32
14710 In-Reply-To: <40a33d50.06141@achurch.org>
14711 References: <40a33d50.06141@achurch.org>
14712 Message-ID: <1084447331.40a35a636b02e@mail.azoff.homeip.net>
14713
14714 Quoting Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>:
14715
14716 > Since Bahamut 1.8.0 has been released, I'm updating the Bahamut
14717 > protocol module for Services 5.0.32. However, due to the difficulty of
14718 > supporting both 1.8.0 and earlier versions simultaneously, support for
14719 > earlier versions of Bahamut will be dropped completely in Services 5.0.32.
14720 > Normally I wouldn't make such a precipitous change in a maintenance
14721 > release, but given that the current module only supports older versions,
14722 > and that those older versions reportedly have a number of fairly major
14723 > bugs, I think it's reasonable in this case.
14724 >
14725 > In summary: If you're running Bahamut, you'll have to upgrade all of
14726 > your servers to 1.8.0 before you can use Services 5.0.32.
14727
14728 Can I ask why you can't just rename the old one to something like bahamut-old or
14729 something and later remove it?
14730 I think it would be great if you did support the 1.4 releases befor there are
14731 some patchsets like blitzed that uses 1.4.
14732
14733 Btw, what does not work in .31 and 1.8? I haven't seen anything broken yet.
14734
14735 Regards,
14736 --
14737 .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
14738 : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
14739 `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
14740 `-- http://www.se.linux.org
14741
14742 ----------------------------------------------------------------
14743 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
14744
14745
14746 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu May 13 05:15:32 2004
14747 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
14748 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14749 Subject: [IRCServices] Advance warning for 5.0.32
14750 Message-ID: <mailman.54.1098597728.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14751
14752 I dont use Bahamut, but i tend to agree with this opinion, imo, theres nothing wrong with leaving an 'old' module in there for people who dont run 1.8.0.
14753
14754 At the end of the day thou, if the worst comes to the worst, users of older releases can just backup their old module, before updating services, then just put it back where it was before (removing the new support)
14755
14756 Like i say, i dont use Bahamut, so its just my opinion
14757
14758 /****************************************
14759 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
14760 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
14761 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
14762 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
14763 ****************************************/
14764
14765
14766 /****************************************
14767 * From - Torbj?rnSvensson <azoff@se.linux.org>
14768 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14769 * Sent - 2004-05-13 12:22:11
14770 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Advance warning for 5.0.32
14771 ****************************************/
14772
14773 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
14774
14775 >Quoting Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>:
14776 >
14777 >> Since Bahamut 1.8.0 has been released, I'm updating the Bahamut
14778 >> protocol module for Services 5.0.32. However, due to the difficulty of
14779 >> supporting both 1.8.0 and earlier versions simultaneously, support for
14780 >> earlier versions of Bahamut will be dropped completely in Services 5.0.32.
14781 >> Normally I wouldn't make such a precipitous change in a maintenance
14782 >> release, but given that the current module only supports older versions,
14783 >> and that those older versions reportedly have a number of fairly major
14784 >> bugs, I think it's reasonable in this case.
14785 >>
14786 >> In summary: If you're running Bahamut, you'll have to upgrade all of
14787 >> your servers to 1.8.0 before you can use Services 5.0.32.
14788 >
14789 >Can I ask why you can't just rename the old one to something like bahamut-old or
14790 >something and later remove it?
14791 >I think it would be great if you did support the 1.4 releases befor there are
14792 >some patchsets like blitzed that uses 1.4.
14793 >
14794 >Btw, what does not work in .31 and 1.8? I haven't seen anything broken yet.
14795 >
14796 >Regards,
14797 >--
14798 > .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
14799 > : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
14800 > `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
14801 > `-- http://www.se.linux.org
14802 >
14803 >----------------------------------------------------------------
14804 >This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
14805 >
14806 >------------------------------------------------------------------
14807 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14808 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14809 >.
14810
14811 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
14812
14813 From emurphy at sporked.us Thu May 13 08:01:06 2004
14814 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric Murphy)
14815 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14816 Subject: [IRCServices] Bahamut 1.8.0
14817 References: <40A143EF.9070207@se.linux.org>
14818 Message-ID: <018601c438fb$1e6f64a0$4200a8c0@user3giu7hz2mo>
14819
14820 The most obvious thing to me that needs fixed is combining Chanserv Akicks
14821 with exceptions.
14822
14823 This also happens with Unreal, but I've never mentioned it before since
14824 Unreal was in beta forever...
14825 But it's the very same behavior.
14826
14827 [10:43:43] * Now talking in #test
14828 [10:43:43] -test.sporked.us:#test- *** Notice -- TS for #test changed from
14829 1084459414 to 1084412605
14830 [10:43:43] * services.sporked.us sets mode: -o Erusun
14831 [10:43:43] * services.sporked.us sets mode: +o Erusun
14832 [10:43:43] * ChanServ sets mode: +ntr-o Erusun
14833 [10:44:03] * ChanServ sets mode: +o Erusun
14834 [10:47:37] -ChanServ- *!*@* added to #test autokick list.
14835 [10:53:16] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14836 [10:53:16] * services.sporked.us sets mode: +b *!*@*
14837 [10:53:16] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14838 banned from the channel)
14839 * Retrieving #test modes...
14840 [10:53:29] * Erusun sets mode: +e *!*@*
14841 [10:53:46] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14842 [10:53:46] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14843 banned from the channel)
14844 [10:53:46] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14845 [10:53:46] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14846 banned from the channel)
14847 [10:53:46] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14848 [10:53:46] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14849 banned from the channel)
14850 [10:53:50] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14851 [10:53:50] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14852 banned from the channel)
14853 [10:53:58] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14854 [10:53:58] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14855 banned from the channel)
14856 [10:53:58] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14857 [10:53:58] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14858 banned from the channel)
14859 [10:54:02] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14860 [10:54:02] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) Quit (Local kill by
14861 Erusun (No reason specified))
14862 [10:54:33] * testuser (~erusun@www.eternalcomputers.net) has joined #test
14863 [10:54:33] * testuser was kicked by services.sporked.us (User has been
14864 banned from the channel)
14865 ----- Original Message -----
14866 From: "Torbj?rn Svensson" <azoff@se.linux.org>
14867 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
14868 Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:21 PM
14869 Subject: [IRCServices] Bahamut 1.8.0
14870
14871
14872 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
14873 Hash: SHA1
14874
14875 Hi
14876
14877 Just wanna tell you people out there that my upgrade to 1.8.0 worked
14878 well with latest ircservices. I haven't found anything broken yet.
14879
14880 Andrew, are you plaing to add this release to the "supported" list?
14881
14882
14883 Regards,
14884 - --
14885 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
14886 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
14887 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
14888 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
14889
14890 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14891 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
14892 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
14893
14894 iD8DBQFAoUPieY7jmtvbDP0RAoZmAJ9lK/d9xDGHJp1Qrv8mPfphLq4IggCgkVrD
14895 lnp9gCKKlMSRIqh1iGaG5N4=
14896 =YpkI
14897 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
14898
14899 ------------------------------------------------------------------
14900 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14901 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14902
14903
14904
14905 From achurch at achurch.org Fri May 14 00:38:46 2004
14906 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14907 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14908 Subject: [IRCServices] Advance warning for 5.0.32
14909 In-Reply-To: <1084447331.40a35a636b02e@mail.azoff.homeip.net>
14910 Message-ID: <40a39760.14432@achurch.org>
14911
14912 >Can I ask why you can't just rename the old one to something like bahamut-old or
14913 >something and later remove it?
14914
14915 I actually thought of that after I sent the message, but on the other
14916 hand I don't want to leave in a module that had compatibility issues with
14917 later 1.4 releases anyway (SZLINE didn't work, for one thing). I haven't
14918 decided whether to do that or not, but I'd suggest looking into upgrading
14919 your Bahamut in any case.
14920
14921 --Andrew Church
14922 achurch@achurch.org
14923 http://achurch.org/
14924
14925
14926 From azoff at se.linux.org Thu May 13 14:13:25 2004
14927 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?VG9yYmpvInJuIFN2ZW5zc29u?=)
14928 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14929 Subject: [IRCServices] Advance warning for 5.0.32
14930 In-Reply-To: <40a39760.14432@achurch.org>
14931 References: <40a39760.14432@achurch.org>
14932 Message-ID: <40A3E4F5.1000402@se.linux.org>
14933
14934 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
14935 Hash: SHA1
14936
14937 Andrew Church wrote:
14938 | I actually thought of that after I sent the message, but on the other
14939 | hand I don't want to leave in a module that had compatibility issues with
14940 | later 1.4 releases anyway (SZLINE didn't work, for one thing). I haven't
14941 | decided whether to do that or not, but I'd suggest looking into upgrading
14942 | your Bahamut in any case.
14943
14944 As I get it, the 1.4 will *not* be upgraded any more.
14945 I have already moved over and it works with my needs. I don't use +e so
14946 I haven't seen that "bug".
14947
14948
14949 Regards,
14950 - --
14951 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
14952 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
14953 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
14954 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
14955
14956 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14957 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
14958 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
14959
14960 iD8DBQFAo+T0eY7jmtvbDP0RAsdgAJ0bHtYIemGFJjP/yWz1ML5xBgHk5wCfX6a6
14961 hcyZ69p9E7NIemx4Y+5qGI8=
14962 =6kfu
14963 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
14964
14965
14966 From achurch at achurch.org Fri May 14 14:46:05 2004
14967 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14968 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14969 Subject: [IRCServices] Bahamut 1.8.0
14970 In-Reply-To: <018601c438fb$1e6f64a0$4200a8c0@user3giu7hz2mo>
14971 Message-ID: <40a45d28.17700@achurch.org>
14972
14973 >The most obvious thing to me that needs fixed is combining Chanserv Akicks
14974 >with exceptions.
14975
14976 Fixed, thanks for the report.
14977
14978 --Andrew Church
14979 achurch@achurch.org
14980 http://achurch.org/
14981
14982
14983 From us44ever at hotmail.com Fri May 14 03:18:09 2004
14984 From: us44ever at hotmail.com (us44ever .)
14985 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
14986 Subject: [IRCServices] error while installing
14987 Message-ID: <Sea1-F44SmOMu3fk6Ue000122e2@hotmail.com>
14988
14989 yea i downloaded the full package, not the diff, and it worked fine. thanks.
14990
14991
14992 >
14993 > Try again from the .tar file.
14994 >
14995 > --Andrew Church
14996 > achurch@achurch.org
14997 > http://achurch.org/
14998 >
14999 > >hi Andrew,
15000 > >
15001 > >i didn't modify anything, it has been directly downloaded from
15002 > >ftp://ftp.ircservices.za.net/pub/ircservices/ircservices-5.0.31.diff.gz
15003 > >
15004 > >
15005 > >>
15006 > >> >convert-trircd.o: In function `trircd_load_ajoin':
15007 > >> >/usr/home/hub/ircservices-5.0.31/tools/convert-trircd.c:215: undefined
15008 > >> >reference to `ngi_mainnick'
15009 > >>
15010 > >> Try again with unmodified sources.
15011 > >>
15012 > >> --Andrew Church
15013 > >> achurch@achurch.org
15014 > >> http://achurch.org/
15015 > >
15016 > >_________________________________________________________________
15017 > >FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar \96 get it now!
15018 > >http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
15019 > >
15020 > >
15021 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
15022 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15023 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15024 >
15025 >------------------------------------------------------------------
15026 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15027 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15028
15029 _________________________________________________________________
15030 Stop worrying about overloading your inbox - get MSN Hotmail Extra Storage!
15031 http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/
15032
15033
15034
15035 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri May 14 10:01:12 2004
15036 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
15037 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15038 Subject: [IRCServices] +z channel mode
15039 Message-ID: <20040514170112.63121.qmail@web86408.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
15040
15041 UnrealIrcd supports +z channelmode (only secure
15042 connections may join)
15043 If i add +z to mlock the FIRST user who join without
15044 using a secure connection must be kick/banned from the
15045 channel like +A , +O mlocks
15046
15047 (When a user is the FIRST user on a channel and try to
15048 join on a +O or +A mlocked channel even if the channen
15049 is "RESTRICTED OFF" chanserv kicks and bans this user)
15050
15051 Correct Me If I'm Wrong
15052
15053 =====
15054 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
15055
15056
15057
15058 From mark at phedny.net Fri May 14 10:14:12 2004
15059 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
15060 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15061 Subject: [IRCServices] +z channel mode
15062 In-Reply-To: <20040514170112.63121.qmail@web86408.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
15063 References: <20040514170112.63121.qmail@web86408.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
15064 Message-ID: <40A4FE64.7020100@phedny.net>
15065
15066 Actually, this should only be done when the user doesn't have +z user
15067 mode, since that indicates he is connected by SSL himself.
15068
15069 Dionisios K. wrote:
15070
15071 >UnrealIrcd supports +z channelmode (only secure
15072 >connections may join)
15073 >If i add +z to mlock the FIRST user who join without
15074 >using a secure connection must be kick/banned from the
15075 >channel like +A , +O mlocks
15076 >
15077 >(When a user is the FIRST user on a channel and try to
15078 >join on a +O or +A mlocked channel even if the channen
15079 >is "RESTRICTED OFF" chanserv kicks and bans this user)
15080 >
15081 >Correct Me If I'm Wrong
15082 >
15083 >=====
15084 >Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
15085 >
15086 >
15087 >------------------------------------------------------------------
15088 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15089 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15090 >
15091 >
15092 >
15093
15094
15095
15096 From admin at nevernet.net Sat May 15 15:45:45 2004
15097 From: admin at nevernet.net (Elijah)
15098 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15099 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
15100 Message-ID: <9A2B7058-A6C1-11D8-86B3-000A95ACFF92@nevernet.net>
15101
15102 Has anyone had any success compiling and running ircservices on mac os
15103 x?
15104
15105 Elijah
15106
15107
15108
15109
15110 From trido at swallegiance.com Sat May 15 23:34:01 2004
15111 From: trido at swallegiance.com (Trido)
15112 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15113 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15114 Message-ID: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15115
15116 I am trying to get IRCServices 5.0.31 to work on my Unreal 3.2 IRCD server. When I try to start it up, I get the following message:
15117
15118 [04:30:47 pm] -irc.swallegiance.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for irc.swallegiance.com(unknown@69.28.183.209) (No link block named 'irc.swallegiance.com') [@69.28.183.209.6677]
15119
15120 My ircservices.log file says:
15121
15122 [May 15 23:29:56 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
15123 [May 15 23:29:56 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
15124 [May 15 23:29:56 2004] unknown message from server (:irc.swallegiance.com 451 PING :You have not registered)
15125 [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
15126 [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing Link: [69.28.183.209] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
15127 [May 15 23:29:57 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
15128
15129 Does anyone know what might be causing that?
15130
15131 Trido
15132 -------------- next part --------------
15133 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
15134 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040516/6cd19664/attachment.html
15135 From mark at phedny.net Sun May 16 02:42:46 2004
15136 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
15137 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15138 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15139 In-Reply-To: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15140 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15141 Message-ID: <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net>
15142
15143 Hi Trido,
15144
15145 How does your link block in de Unreal config looks like?
15146 In particular the name of the link block and the hostname to connect to.
15147
15148 - Mark
15149
15150 Trido wrote:
15151
15152 > I am trying to get IRCServices 5.0.31 to work on my Unreal 3.2 IRCD
15153 > server. When I try to start it up, I get the following message:
15154 >
15155 > [04:30:47 pm] -irc.swallegiance.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
15156 > irc.swallegiance.com(unknown@69.28.183.209
15157 > <mailto:unknown@69.28.183.209>) (No link block named
15158 > 'irc.swallegiance.com') [@69.28.183.209.6677]
15159 >
15160 > My ircservices.log file says:
15161 >
15162 > [May 15 23:29:56 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
15163 > [May 15 23:29:56 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
15164 > [May 15 23:29:56 2004] unknown message from server
15165 > (:irc.swallegiance.com 451 PING :You have not registered)
15166 > [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
15167 > (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
15168 > [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing
15169 > Link: [69.28.183.209] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
15170 > [May 15 23:29:57 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
15171 >
15172 > Does anyone know what might be causing that?
15173 >
15174 > Trido
15175 >
15176 >------------------------------------------------------------------------
15177 >
15178 >------------------------------------------------------------------
15179 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15180 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15181 >
15182 >
15183
15184
15185
15186 From trido at swallegiance.com Sun May 16 04:46:52 2004
15187 From: trido at swallegiance.com (Trido)
15188 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15189 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15190 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15191 <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net>
15192 Message-ID: <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15193
15194 Here it is. This was the one section I was having trouble with. I admit I
15195 didn't understand a lot of it. But this is what I have now:
15196
15197 link irc.swallegiance.com
15198 {
15199 username *;
15200 hostname ircservices@69.28.183.209;
15201 bind-ip *;
15202 port 12701;
15203 hub *;
15204 password-connect "password";
15205 password-receive "password";
15206 class servers;
15207 options {
15208 ssl;
15209 zip;
15210 md5;
15211 };
15212 };
15213
15214 Trido
15215
15216 ----- Original Message -----
15217 From: "Mark van Cuijk" <mark@phedny.net>
15218 To: "Trido" <trido@swallegiance.com>; "IRC Services General Mailing List"
15219 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15220 Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 7:42 PM
15221 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15222
15223
15224 > Hi Trido,
15225 >
15226 > How does your link block in de Unreal config looks like?
15227 > In particular the name of the link block and the hostname to connect to.
15228 >
15229 > - Mark
15230 >
15231 > Trido wrote:
15232 >
15233 > > I am trying to get IRCServices 5.0.31 to work on my Unreal 3.2 IRCD
15234 > > server. When I try to start it up, I get the following message:
15235 > >
15236 > > [04:30:47 pm] -irc.swallegiance.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
15237 > > irc.swallegiance.com(unknown@69.28.183.209
15238 > > <mailto:unknown@69.28.183.209>) (No link block named
15239 > > 'irc.swallegiance.com') [@69.28.183.209.6677]
15240 > >
15241 > > My ircservices.log file says:
15242 > >
15243 > > [May 15 23:29:56 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
15244 > > [May 15 23:29:56 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
15245 > > [May 15 23:29:56 2004] unknown message from server
15246 > > (:irc.swallegiance.com 451 PING :You have not registered)
15247 > > [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
15248 > > (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
15249 > > [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing
15250 > > Link: [69.28.183.209] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
15251 > > [May 15 23:29:57 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
15252 > >
15253 > > Does anyone know what might be causing that?
15254 > >
15255 > > Trido
15256 > >
15257 > >------------------------------------------------------------------------
15258 > >
15259 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
15260 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15261 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15262 > >
15263 > >
15264 >
15265 >
15266 >
15267
15268
15269
15270 From chris at starglade.org Sun May 16 04:53:52 2004
15271 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
15272 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15273 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15274 In-Reply-To: <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15275 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net>
15276 <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15277 Message-ID: <40A75650.8050404@starglade.org>
15278
15279 Trido wrote:
15280
15281 > Here it is. This was the one section I was having trouble with. I admit I
15282 > didn't understand a lot of it. But this is what I have now:
15283
15284 Your hostname is wrong. It should just be the IP address or a domain
15285 name - remove the ircservices@ from it.
15286
15287 Chris
15288
15289 --
15290 Chris Jenkinson
15291 chris@starglade.org
15292
15293
15294
15295 From trido at swallegiance.com Sun May 16 05:09:50 2004
15296 From: trido at swallegiance.com (Trido)
15297 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15298 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15299 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net>
15300 <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15301 <40A75650.8050404@starglade.org>
15302 Message-ID: <000d01c43b3e$b3d5a230$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15303
15304 Sadly that didn't work. I still get the same error.
15305
15306 Trido
15307
15308
15309 > Your hostname is wrong. It should just be the IP address or a domain
15310 > name - remove the ircservices@ from it.
15311 >
15312 > Chris
15313
15314
15315
15316
15317 From chris at starglade.org Sun May 16 05:16:08 2004
15318 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
15319 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15320 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15321 In-Reply-To: <000d01c43b3e$b3d5a230$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15322 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net> <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A75650.8050404@starglade.org>
15323 <000d01c43b3e$b3d5a230$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15324 Message-ID: <40A75B88.8030006@starglade.org>
15325
15326 Trido wrote:
15327
15328 > Sadly that didn't work. I still get the same error.
15329
15330 Ok, are the IP addresses correct?
15331
15332 The hostname should be the IP address or domain name of the server
15333 services are connecting from - if it is on the same computer, use 127.0.0.1.
15334
15335 C
15336
15337 --
15338 Chris Jenkinson
15339 chris@starglade.org
15340
15341
15342
15343 From jamie at silverdream.org Sun May 16 05:17:51 2004
15344 From: jamie at silverdream.org (Jamie L. Penman-Smithson)
15345 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15346 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15347 In-Reply-To: <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15348 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15349 <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net> <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15350 Message-ID: <1084709870.16140.13.camel@oasis.silverdream.hq>
15351
15352 On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 12:46, Trido wrote:
15353 <snip>
15354 > options {
15355 > ssl;
15356 > zip;
15357 > md5;
15358 > };
15359 <snip>
15360
15361 AFAIK ircservices does not support compressed (which I think was
15362 discussed a while ago on this mailing list(?)) or encrypted links.
15363
15364 HTH,
15365
15366 --
15367 -jamie <jamie@silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam@silverdream.org
15368 w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms@silverdream.org
15369 pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key
15370 12:30:01 up 14 days, 22:03, 13 users, load average: 0.30, 0.27, 0.26
15371
15372 -------------- next part --------------
15373 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
15374 Name: not available
15375 Type: application/pgp-signature
15376 Size: 189 bytes
15377 Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
15378 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040516/01449e3d/attachment.pgp
15379 From emurphy at sporked.us Sun May 16 05:27:47 2004
15380 From: emurphy at sporked.us (Eric Murphy)
15381 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15382 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15383 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net><000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN><40A75650.8050404@starglade.org>
15384 <000d01c43b3e$b3d5a230$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15385 Message-ID: <009b01c43b41$3313b8a0$0100a8c0@eric>
15386
15387 What does the server it's connecting to say?
15388
15389 Erusun
15390
15391 ----- Original Message -----
15392 From: "Trido" <trido@swallegiance.com>
15393 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15394 Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 8:09 AM
15395 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15396
15397
15398 > Sadly that didn't work. I still get the same error.
15399 >
15400 > Trido
15401 >
15402 >
15403 > > Your hostname is wrong. It should just be the IP address or a domain
15404 > > name - remove the ircservices@ from it.
15405 > >
15406 > > Chris
15407 >
15408 >
15409 >
15410 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15411 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15412 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15413
15414
15415 From mark at phedny.net Sun May 16 08:52:35 2004
15416 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
15417 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15418 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15419 In-Reply-To: <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15420 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net>
15421 <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15422 Message-ID: <40A78E43.2020303@phedny.net>
15423
15424 Trido wrote:
15425
15426 >link irc.swallegiance.com
15427 >{
15428 > username *;
15429 > hostname ircservices@69.28.183.209;
15430 > bind-ip *;
15431 > port 12701;
15432 > hub *;
15433 > password-connect "password";
15434 > password-receive "password";
15435 > class servers;
15436 > options {
15437 > ssl;
15438 > zip;
15439 > md5;
15440 > };
15441 >};
15442 >
15443 >
15444 To make this work, your services ServerName must be
15445 irc.swallegiance.com. To me it's more likely this is the name of the
15446 IRCd server itself, so you should probably change it to
15447 services.irc.swallegiance.com or something you like. Anyway, it should
15448 match the name you specify for ServerName in the ircservices.conf file.
15449
15450 Then you should make the hostname be only 69.28.183.209, without the
15451 username in front of it.
15452 Also, the ssl, zip and md5 options should be removed and I suggest to
15453 remove the hub line to, since services will not link to any other host.
15454
15455 Since your log file shows
15456
15457 > [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
15458 > (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
15459
15460 I think you're using port 6677 for services and not 12701.
15461
15462 - Mark
15463
15464
15465 From chris at starglade.org Sun May 16 08:54:25 2004
15466 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
15467 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15468 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15469 In-Reply-To: <40A78E43.2020303@phedny.net>
15470 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net> <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15471 <40A78E43.2020303@phedny.net>
15472 Message-ID: <40A78EB1.6030809@starglade.org>
15473
15474 Mark van Cuijk wrote:
15475
15476 > Also, the ssl, zip and md5 options should be removed and I suggest to
15477 > remove the hub line to, since services will not link to any other host.
15478
15479 No, services should be allowed to introduce fake servers so it can jupe
15480 the real server.
15481
15482 C
15483
15484 --
15485 Chris Jenkinson
15486 chris@starglade.org
15487
15488
15489
15490 From kfiresun at ix.netcom.com Sun May 16 11:42:39 2004
15491 From: kfiresun at ix.netcom.com (Kelmar K. Firesun)
15492 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15493 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
15494 References: <9A2B7058-A6C1-11D8-86B3-000A95ACFF92@nevernet.net>
15495 Message-ID: <003b01c43b75$90cb1fe0$1f01a8c0@bahamut>
15496
15497 As of OS 10.3.x support for the dyndl fuctions have become available.
15498
15499 However, I have not had much luck with the ar utility playing nice.
15500 I can run it by hand, but it bombs out when running make.
15501
15502 As a side note there needs to be a -fno-builtin option passed to the
15503 compiler on Mac OS X so you don't get that anoying warning about the
15504 builtin log function conflicting with that of the log function defined
15505 within Services itself. This can be added to the second appearance
15506 of the MORE_CFLAGS variable in the top level Makefile.
15507
15508 e.g.:
15509 MORE_CFLAGS = -g -fno-builtin -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
15510
15511 I'll keep playing with it until I can get it to work. I think it
15512 just boils down to some tweaking of the various Makefiles.
15513
15514 Kelmar K. Firesun (IRL: Bryce Simonds)
15515 Assistant Admin: dream.esper.net
15516
15517 ----- Original Message -----
15518 From: "Elijah" <admin@nevernet.net>
15519 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15520 Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 5:45 PM
15521 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
15522
15523
15524 > Has anyone had any success compiling and running ircservices on mac os
15525 > x?
15526 >
15527 > Elijah
15528 >
15529 >
15530 >
15531 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15532 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15533 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15534
15535
15536 From trido at swallegiance.com Sun May 16 16:32:00 2004
15537 From: trido at swallegiance.com (Trido)
15538 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15539 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15540 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net> <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN><40A78E43.2020303@phedny.net>
15541 <40A78EB1.6030809@starglade.org>
15542 Message-ID: <002001c43b9e$008738f0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15543
15544 Well, I tried all the things suggested still to no avail. Here is what it
15545 said to my last:
15546
15547 [09:29:44 am] -irc.swallegiance.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
15548 services.irc.swallegiance.com(unknown@69.28.183.209) (No link block named
15549 'services.irc.swallegiance.com') [@69.28.183.209.65050]
15550
15551 and
15552
15553 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
15554 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
15555 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (:irc.swallegiance.com
15556 451 PING :You have not registered)
15557 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied (No
15558 matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.65050])
15559 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing Link:
15560 [69.28.183.209] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
15561 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
15562
15563 Trido
15564
15565
15566
15567 From Adm at Land-of-Ahz.com Sun May 16 17:24:36 2004
15568 From: Adm at Land-of-Ahz.com (Sys Admin)
15569 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15570 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15571 References: <000b01c43b0f$ca0e9cc0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN> <40A73796.4060904@phedny.net> <000701c43b3b$7e19b620$7100a8c0@JUSTIN><40A78E43.2020303@phedny.net><40A78EB1.6030809@starglade.org>
15572 <002001c43b9e$008738f0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15573 Message-ID: <000a01c43ba5$5663cc00$6401a8c0@mother1a>
15574
15575 you might want to check your config C and N lines, it does not look like it
15576 is linking correctly to your IRC.
15577
15578 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied (No
15579 matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.65050])
15580 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing Link:
15581 [69.28.183.209] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
15582 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
15583
15584 Ahz
15585 ~~~
15586 www.Land-of-Ahz.com
15587 IRC.Land-of-Ahz.com
15588 ----- Original Message -----
15589 From: Trido
15590 To: IRC Services General Mailing List
15591 Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:32 PM
15592 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15593
15594
15595 Well, I tried all the things suggested still to no avail. Here is what it
15596 said to my last:
15597
15598 [09:29:44 am] -irc.swallegiance.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
15599 services.irc.swallegiance.com(unknown@69.28.183.209) (No link block named
15600 'services.irc.swallegiance.com') [@69.28.183.209.65050]
15601
15602 and
15603
15604 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
15605 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
15606 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (:irc.swallegiance.com
15607 451 PING :You have not registered)
15608 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied (No
15609 matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.65050])
15610 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing Link:
15611 [69.28.183.209] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
15612 [May 16 16:29:08 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
15613
15614 Trido
15615
15616
15617 ------------------------------------------------------------------
15618 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15619 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15620
15621
15622
15623
15624 From achurch at achurch.org Mon May 17 09:25:36 2004
15625 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
15626 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15627 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
15628 In-Reply-To: <003b01c43b75$90cb1fe0$1f01a8c0@bahamut>
15629 Message-ID: <40a807c0.42147@achurch.org>
15630
15631 >However, I have not had much luck with the ar utility playing nice.
15632 >I can run it by hand, but it bombs out when running make.
15633
15634 Check the exit code of ar ("ar ... ; echo $?"), particularly with
15635 respect to the presence/absence of the -c option vs. the existence or
15636 nonexistence of the output (.a) file; it could be that the MacOS ar is anal
15637 about return codes. If not, it could just be a bug in ar--in that case, I
15638 guess you'll need to file a bug report with Apple.
15639
15640 >As a side note there needs to be a -fno-builtin option passed to the
15641 >compiler on Mac OS X so you don't get that anoying warning about the
15642 >builtin log function conflicting with that of the log function defined
15643 >within Services itself. This can be added to the second appearance
15644 >of the MORE_CFLAGS variable in the top level Makefile.
15645 >
15646 >e.g.:
15647 >MORE_CFLAGS = -g -fno-builtin -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
15648
15649 This has been in the Makefile since forever. Are you sure you're
15650 using current source?
15651
15652 --Andrew Church
15653 achurch@achurch.org
15654 http://achurch.org/
15655
15656
15657 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Sun May 16 23:19:11 2004
15658 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
15659 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15660 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: Startup Problem
15661 In-Reply-To: <200405170028.i4H0SV6t015587@mx2.wm.co.za>
15662 Message-ID: <web-314249374@mail01.infosat.net>
15663
15664 Hi, I do offer support for UnrealIRCd, and it looks like I
15665 should be able to fix this. Please can you send me the
15666 following information:
15667
15668 - From UnrealIRCd: your link blocks and listen blocks
15669 - From Services: the RemoteServer and ServerName
15670 directives
15671 - Additional information: the IP's/hostnames of the
15672 computers.
15673
15674 As the information I'm requesting can be considered
15675 sensitive, please send it to me DIRECTLY - don't post it to
15676 this mailing list.
15677 _____________________________________________________________________
15678 For super low premiums ,click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
15679
15680
15681 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Mon May 17 05:40:19 2004
15682 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
15683 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15684 Subject: [IRCServices] +z
15685 Message-ID: <20040517124019.89313.qmail@web86406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
15686
15687 I have sent an email for +z. I didnt receive any
15688 answer... Can i have an answer for this?
15689
15690 =====
15691 Dionisios K. - VoNiTsA On GrNet
15692
15693
15694
15695 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 17 15:39:57 2004
15696 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
15697 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15698 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15699 Message-ID: <mailman.55.1098597728.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15700
15701 Try using this as your link block instead
15702
15703 link services.irc.swallegiance.com
15704 {
15705 username *;
15706 hostname 69.28.183.209;
15707 bind-ip *;
15708 port 12701;
15709 hub *;
15710 password-connect "password";
15711 password-receive "password";
15712 class servers;
15713 };
15714
15715 and in your ircservices.conf
15716
15717 RemoteServer irc.swallegiance.com 12701 "password"
15718 LocalAddress 69.28.183.209
15719 ServerName "services.irc.swallegiance.com"
15720
15721
15722 That will then force services to use the IP address the IRCd expects from it, obviously replace password with the relevant password.
15723
15724 Also, if your link config is in a seperate file, ensure that it is included in your main config.
15725
15726 That _SHOULD_ fix your probs.
15727
15728
15729
15730 /****************************************
15731 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
15732 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
15733 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
15734 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
15735 ****************************************/
15736
15737
15738 /****************************************
15739 * From - Mark van Cuijk <mark@phedny.net>
15740 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15741 * Sent - 2004-05-16 16:52:35
15742 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15743 ****************************************/
15744
15745 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
15746
15747 >Trido wrote:
15748 >
15749 >>link irc.swallegiance.com
15750 >>{
15751 >> username *;
15752 >> hostname ircservices@69.28.183.209;
15753 >> bind-ip *;
15754 >> port 12701;
15755 >> hub *;
15756 >> password-connect "password";
15757 >> password-receive "password";
15758 >> class servers;
15759 >> options {
15760 >> ssl;
15761 >> zip;
15762 >> md5;
15763 >> };
15764 >>};
15765 >>
15766 >>
15767 >To make this work, your services ServerName must be
15768 >irc.swallegiance.com. To me it's more likely this is the name of the
15769 >IRCd server itself, so you should probably change it to
15770 >services.irc.swallegiance.com or something you like. Anyway, it should
15771 >match the name you specify for ServerName in the ircservices.conf file.
15772 >
15773 >Then you should make the hostname be only 69.28.183.209, without the
15774 >username in front of it.
15775 >Also, the ssl, zip and md5 options should be removed and I suggest to
15776 >remove the hub line to, since services will not link to any other host.
15777 >
15778 >Since your log file shows
15779 >
15780 >> [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
15781 >> (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
15782 >
15783 >I think you're using port 6677 for services and not 12701.
15784 >
15785 >- Mark
15786 >
15787 >------------------------------------------------------------------
15788 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15789 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15790 >.
15791
15792 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
15793
15794
15795
15796
15797 From trido at swallegiance.com Mon May 17 16:22:31 2004
15798 From: trido at swallegiance.com (Trido)
15799 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15800 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15801 Message-ID: <000201c43c66$60f4c040$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15802
15803 That actually worked. I stopped getting error messages. Thanks. :)
15804 Doesn't mean my problems are over though. My new problem is this:
15805
15806 [May 17 16:17:59 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
15807 [May 17 16:18:00 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
15808 [May 17 16:18:00 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(0): Socket is not
15809 connected
15810 [May 17 16:18:03 2004] Read error from server: Socket is not connected
15811
15812 Anyone have any ideas?
15813
15814 Trido
15815
15816 ----- Original Message -----
15817 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
15818 To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15819 Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 8:39 AM
15820 Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15821
15822
15823 > Try using this as your link block instead
15824 >
15825 > link services.irc.swallegiance.com
15826 > {
15827 > username *;
15828 > hostname 69.28.183.209;
15829 > bind-ip *;
15830 > port 12701;
15831 > hub *;
15832 > password-connect "password";
15833 > password-receive "password";
15834 > class servers;
15835 > };
15836 >
15837 > and in your ircservices.conf
15838 >
15839 > RemoteServer irc.swallegiance.com 12701 "password"
15840 > LocalAddress 69.28.183.209
15841 > ServerName "services.irc.swallegiance.com"
15842 >
15843 >
15844 > That will then force services to use the IP address the IRCd expects from
15845 it, obviously replace password with the relevant password.
15846 >
15847 > Also, if your link config is in a seperate file, ensure that it is
15848 included in your main config.
15849 >
15850 > That _SHOULD_ fix your probs.
15851 >
15852 >
15853 >
15854 > /****************************************
15855 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
15856 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
15857 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
15858 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
15859 > ****************************************/
15860 >
15861 >
15862 > /****************************************
15863 > * From - Mark van Cuijk <mark@phedny.net>
15864 > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
15865 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15866 > * Sent - 2004-05-16 16:52:35
15867 > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15868 > ****************************************/
15869 >
15870 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
15871 >
15872 > >Trido wrote:
15873 > >
15874 > >>link irc.swallegiance.com
15875 > >>{
15876 > >> username *;
15877 > >> hostname ircservices@69.28.183.209;
15878 > >> bind-ip *;
15879 > >> port 12701;
15880 > >> hub *;
15881 > >> password-connect "password";
15882 > >> password-receive "password";
15883 > >> class servers;
15884 > >> options {
15885 > >> ssl;
15886 > >> zip;
15887 > >> md5;
15888 > >> };
15889 > >>};
15890 > >>
15891 > >>
15892 > >To make this work, your services ServerName must be
15893 > >irc.swallegiance.com. To me it's more likely this is the name of the
15894 > >IRCd server itself, so you should probably change it to
15895 > >services.irc.swallegiance.com or something you like. Anyway, it should
15896 > >match the name you specify for ServerName in the ircservices.conf file.
15897 > >
15898 > >Then you should make the hostname be only 69.28.183.209, without the
15899 > >username in front of it.
15900 > >Also, the ssl, zip and md5 options should be removed and I suggest to
15901 > >remove the hub line to, since services will not link to any other host.
15902 > >
15903 > >Since your log file shows
15904 > >
15905 > >> [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
15906 > >> (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
15907 > >
15908 > >I think you're using port 6677 for services and not 12701.
15909 > >
15910 > >- Mark
15911 > >
15912 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
15913 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15914 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15915 > >.
15916 >
15917 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
15918 >
15919 >
15920 >
15921 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15922 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15923 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15924 >
15925 >
15926
15927
15928
15929 From Rottman3D at yahoo.com Mon May 17 17:03:44 2004
15930 From: Rottman3D at yahoo.com (Rottman3D@yahoo.com)
15931 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
15932 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15933 In-Reply-To: <000201c43c66$60f4c040$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15934 References: <000201c43c66$60f4c040$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
15935 Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20040517200218.02d4b430@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
15936
15937 The web server can not listen on the same port that is being used for the
15938 connection. Also remove the port from your servers config file, just use
15939 port * for the line otherwise the server will try to connect to services
15940 and will fail.
15941
15942
15943 At 07:22 PM 5/17/2004, Trido wrote:
15944 >That actually worked. I stopped getting error messages. Thanks. :)
15945 >Doesn't mean my problems are over though. My new problem is this:
15946 >
15947 >[May 17 16:17:59 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
15948 >[May 17 16:18:00 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
15949 >[May 17 16:18:00 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(0): Socket is not
15950 >connected
15951 >[May 17 16:18:03 2004] Read error from server: Socket is not connected
15952 >
15953 >Anyone have any ideas?
15954 >
15955 >Trido
15956 >
15957 >----- Original Message -----
15958 >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
15959 >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
15960 >Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 8:39 AM
15961 >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
15962 >
15963 >
15964 > > Try using this as your link block instead
15965 > >
15966 > > link services.irc.swallegiance.com
15967 > > {
15968 > > username *;
15969 > > hostname 69.28.183.209;
15970 > > bind-ip *;
15971 > > port 12701;
15972 > > hub *;
15973 > > password-connect "password";
15974 > > password-receive "password";
15975 > > class servers;
15976 > > };
15977 > >
15978 > > and in your ircservices.conf
15979 > >
15980 > > RemoteServer irc.swallegiance.com 12701 "password"
15981 > > LocalAddress 69.28.183.209
15982 > > ServerName "services.irc.swallegiance.com"
15983 > >
15984 > >
15985 > > That will then force services to use the IP address the IRCd expects from
15986 >it, obviously replace password with the relevant password.
15987 > >
15988 > > Also, if your link config is in a seperate file, ensure that it is
15989 >included in your main config.
15990 > >
15991 > > That _SHOULD_ fix your probs.
15992 > >
15993 > >
15994 > >
15995 > > /****************************************
15996 > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
15997 > > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
15998 > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
15999 > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
16000 > > ****************************************/
16001 > >
16002 > >
16003 > > /****************************************
16004 > > * From - Mark van Cuijk <mark@phedny.net>
16005 > > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
16006 ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16007 > > * Sent - 2004-05-16 16:52:35
16008 > > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16009 > > ****************************************/
16010 > >
16011 > > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
16012 > >
16013 > > >Trido wrote:
16014 > > >
16015 > > >>link irc.swallegiance.com
16016 > > >>{
16017 > > >> username *;
16018 > > >> hostname ircservices@69.28.183.209;
16019 > > >> bind-ip *;
16020 > > >> port 12701;
16021 > > >> hub *;
16022 > > >> password-connect "password";
16023 > > >> password-receive "password";
16024 > > >> class servers;
16025 > > >> options {
16026 > > >> ssl;
16027 > > >> zip;
16028 > > >> md5;
16029 > > >> };
16030 > > >>};
16031 > > >>
16032 > > >>
16033 > > >To make this work, your services ServerName must be
16034 > > >irc.swallegiance.com. To me it's more likely this is the name of the
16035 > > >IRCd server itself, so you should probably change it to
16036 > > >services.irc.swallegiance.com or something you like. Anyway, it should
16037 > > >match the name you specify for ServerName in the ircservices.conf file.
16038 > > >
16039 > > >Then you should make the hostname be only 69.28.183.209, without the
16040 > > >username in front of it.
16041 > > >Also, the ssl, zip and md5 options should be removed and I suggest to
16042 > > >remove the hub line to, since services will not link to any other host.
16043 > > >
16044 > > >Since your log file shows
16045 > > >
16046 > > >> [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
16047 > > >> (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
16048 > > >
16049 > > >I think you're using port 6677 for services and not 12701.
16050 > > >
16051 > > >- Mark
16052 > > >
16053 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
16054 > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16055 > > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16056 > > >.
16057 > >
16058 > > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
16059 > >
16060 > >
16061 > >
16062 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
16063 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16064 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16065 > >
16066 > >
16067 >
16068 >
16069 >------------------------------------------------------------------
16070 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16071 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16072
16073
16074
16075
16076 From trido at swallegiance.com Mon May 17 18:38:16 2004
16077 From: trido at swallegiance.com (Trido)
16078 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
16079 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16080 References: <000201c43c66$60f4c040$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
16081 <6.0.0.22.2.20040517200218.02d4b430@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
16082 Message-ID: <000f01c43c78$ef9862e0$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
16083
16084 I am getting close now. Before, when I tried to start IRC Services, it said
16085 it did, but it hadn't due to errors. After that last bit of advice, it now
16086 properly loads up and sits in the background. I am still getting that same
16087 error message in my log file though, and when I try to connect the services,
16088 I get the error message:
16089
16090 [11:37:53 am] -irc.swallegiance.com- *** Connect: Server
16091 services.irc.swallegiance.com is not configured for linking
16092
16093 I don't even know if I am typing the right commands here.
16094
16095 Trido
16096
16097 ----- Original Message -----
16098 From: <Rottman3D@yahoo.com>
16099 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16100 Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:03 AM
16101 Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16102
16103
16104 > The web server can not listen on the same port that is being used for the
16105 > connection. Also remove the port from your servers config file, just use
16106 > port * for the line otherwise the server will try to connect to services
16107 > and will fail.
16108 >
16109 >
16110 > At 07:22 PM 5/17/2004, Trido wrote:
16111 > >That actually worked. I stopped getting error messages. Thanks. :)
16112 > >Doesn't mean my problems are over though. My new problem is this:
16113 > >
16114 > >[May 17 16:17:59 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
16115 > >[May 17 16:18:00 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
16116 > >[May 17 16:18:00 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(0): Socket is not
16117 > >connected
16118 > >[May 17 16:18:03 2004] Read error from server: Socket is not connected
16119 > >
16120 > >Anyone have any ideas?
16121 > >
16122 > >Trido
16123 > >
16124 > >----- Original Message -----
16125 > >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
16126 > >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16127 > >Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 8:39 AM
16128 > >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16129 > >
16130 > >
16131 > > > Try using this as your link block instead
16132 > > >
16133 > > > link services.irc.swallegiance.com
16134 > > > {
16135 > > > username *;
16136 > > > hostname 69.28.183.209;
16137 > > > bind-ip *;
16138 > > > port 12701;
16139 > > > hub *;
16140 > > > password-connect "password";
16141 > > > password-receive "password";
16142 > > > class servers;
16143 > > > };
16144 > > >
16145 > > > and in your ircservices.conf
16146 > > >
16147 > > > RemoteServer irc.swallegiance.com 12701 "password"
16148 > > > LocalAddress 69.28.183.209
16149 > > > ServerName "services.irc.swallegiance.com"
16150 > > >
16151 > > >
16152 > > > That will then force services to use the IP address the IRCd expects
16153 from
16154 > >it, obviously replace password with the relevant password.
16155 > > >
16156 > > > Also, if your link config is in a seperate file, ensure that it is
16157 > >included in your main config.
16158 > > >
16159 > > > That _SHOULD_ fix your probs.
16160 > > >
16161 > > >
16162 > > >
16163 > > > /****************************************
16164 > > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
16165 > > > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
16166 > > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
16167 > > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
16168 > > > ****************************************/
16169 > > >
16170 > > >
16171 > > > /****************************************
16172 > > > * From - Mark van Cuijk <mark@phedny.net>
16173 > > > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
16174 > ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16175 > > > * Sent - 2004-05-16 16:52:35
16176 > > > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16177 > > > ****************************************/
16178 > > >
16179 > > > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
16180 > > >
16181 > > > >Trido wrote:
16182 > > > >
16183 > > > >>link irc.swallegiance.com
16184 > > > >>{
16185 > > > >> username *;
16186 > > > >> hostname ircservices@69.28.183.209;
16187 > > > >> bind-ip *;
16188 > > > >> port 12701;
16189 > > > >> hub *;
16190 > > > >> password-connect "password";
16191 > > > >> password-receive "password";
16192 > > > >> class servers;
16193 > > > >> options {
16194 > > > >> ssl;
16195 > > > >> zip;
16196 > > > >> md5;
16197 > > > >> };
16198 > > > >>};
16199 > > > >>
16200 > > > >>
16201 > > > >To make this work, your services ServerName must be
16202 > > > >irc.swallegiance.com. To me it's more likely this is the name of the
16203 > > > >IRCd server itself, so you should probably change it to
16204 > > > >services.irc.swallegiance.com or something you like. Anyway, it
16205 should
16206 > > > >match the name you specify for ServerName in the ircservices.conf
16207 file.
16208 > > > >
16209 > > > >Then you should make the hostname be only 69.28.183.209, without the
16210 > > > >username in front of it.
16211 > > > >Also, the ssl, zip and md5 options should be removed and I suggest to
16212 > > > >remove the hub line to, since services will not link to any other
16213 host.
16214 > > > >
16215 > > > >Since your log file shows
16216 > > > >
16217 > > > >> [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link
16218 denied
16219 > > > >> (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
16220 > > > >
16221 > > > >I think you're using port 6677 for services and not 12701.
16222 > > > >
16223 > > > >- Mark
16224 > > > >
16225 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
16226 > > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16227 > > > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16228 > > > >.
16229 > > >
16230 > > > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
16231 > > >
16232 > > >
16233 > > >
16234 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
16235 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16236 > > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16237 > > >
16238 > > >
16239 > >
16240 > >
16241 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
16242 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16243 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16244 >
16245 >
16246 >
16247 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
16248 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16249 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16250 >
16251 >
16252
16253
16254
16255 From kfiresun at ix.netcom.com Mon May 17 18:45:57 2004
16256 From: kfiresun at ix.netcom.com (Kelmar K. Firesun)
16257 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
16258 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
16259 References: <40a807c0.42147@achurch.org>
16260 Message-ID: <002b01c43c79$dda82470$1f01a8c0@bahamut>
16261
16262
16263 ----- Original Message -----
16264 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
16265 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16266 Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 7:25 PM
16267 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
16268
16269
16270 > >However, I have not had much luck with the ar utility playing nice.
16271 > >I can run it by hand, but it bombs out when running make.
16272 >
16273 > Check the exit code of ar ("ar ... ; echo $?"), particularly with
16274 > respect to the presence/absence of the -c option vs. the existence or
16275 > nonexistence of the output (.a) file; it could be that the MacOS ar is
16276 anal
16277 > about return codes. If not, it could just be a bug in ar--in that case, I
16278 > guess you'll need to file a bug report with Apple.
16279 >
16280
16281 I'll check that out.
16282
16283 > >As a side note there needs to be a -fno-builtin option passed to the
16284 > >compiler on Mac OS X so you don't get that anoying warning about the
16285 > >builtin log function conflicting with that of the log function defined
16286 > >within Services itself. This can be added to the second appearance
16287 > >of the MORE_CFLAGS variable in the top level Makefile.
16288 > >
16289 > >e.g.:
16290 > >MORE_CFLAGS = -g -fno-builtin -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
16291 >
16292 > This has been in the Makefile since forever. Are you sure you're
16293 > using current source?
16294 >
16295
16296 *boggle*
16297
16298 I did a fresh check out from the CVS repository......
16299
16300
16301
16302
16303 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 18 10:49:02 2004
16304 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
16305 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
16306 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
16307 In-Reply-To: <002b01c43c79$dda82470$1f01a8c0@bahamut>
16308 Message-ID: <40a96bd0.36352@achurch.org>
16309
16310 >> >MORE_CFLAGS = -g -fno-builtin -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
16311 >>
16312 >> This has been in the Makefile since forever. Are you sure you're
16313 >> using current source?
16314 >
16315 >*boggle*
16316 >
16317 >I did a fresh check out from the CVS repository......
16318
16319 I haven't used that repository in ages--it's all stored locally on my
16320 system now. Try again with the distribution tarball.
16321
16322 --Andrew Church
16323 achurch@achurch.org
16324 http://achurch.org/
16325
16326
16327 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 17 18:55:14 2004
16328 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
16329 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
16330 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
16331 Message-ID: <mailman.56.1098597728.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16332
16333 erm, last time i checked.. there wasnt a CVS repository (or at least hasnt been for the 3 or 4 years i've been on the mailing list)..
16334
16335 Your best bet is to download 5.0.31 from ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ and start from scratch :)
16336
16337 /****************************************
16338 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
16339 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
16340 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
16341 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
16342 ****************************************/
16343
16344
16345 /****************************************
16346 * From - Kelmar K. Firesun <kfiresun@ix.netcom.com>
16347 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16348 * Sent - 2004-05-18 02:45:57
16349 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
16350 ****************************************/
16351
16352 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
16353
16354 >
16355 >----- Original Message -----
16356 >From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
16357 >To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16358 >Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 7:25 PM
16359 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
16360 >
16361 >
16362 >> >However, I have not had much luck with the ar utility playing nice.
16363 >> >I can run it by hand, but it bombs out when running make.
16364 >>
16365 >> Check the exit code of ar ("ar ... ; echo $?"), particularly with
16366 >> respect to the presence/absence of the -c option vs. the existence or
16367 >> nonexistence of the output (.a) file; it could be that the MacOS ar is
16368 >anal
16369 >> about return codes. If not, it could just be a bug in ar--in that case, I
16370 >> guess you'll need to file a bug report with Apple.
16371 >>
16372 >
16373 >I'll check that out.
16374 >
16375 >> >As a side note there needs to be a -fno-builtin option passed to the
16376 >> >compiler on Mac OS X so you don't get that anoying warning about the
16377 >> >builtin log function conflicting with that of the log function defined
16378 >> >within Services itself. This can be added to the second appearance
16379 >> >of the MORE_CFLAGS variable in the top level Makefile.
16380 >> >
16381 >> >e.g.:
16382 >> >MORE_CFLAGS = -g -fno-builtin -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
16383 >>
16384 >> This has been in the Makefile since forever. Are you sure you're
16385 >> using current source?
16386 >>
16387 >
16388 >*boggle*
16389 >
16390 >I did a fresh check out from the CVS repository......
16391 >
16392 >
16393 >
16394 >------------------------------------------------------------------
16395 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16396 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16397 >.
16398
16399 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
16400
16401
16402
16403
16404 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon May 17 19:03:16 2004
16405 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
16406 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
16407 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16408 Message-ID: <mailman.57.1098597728.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16409
16410 Maybe you should spend some time reading both thorougly through the Manual Files for Unreal IRCd, and more importantly Services, you seem to be new to the IRCd world, and i can appreciate that, we have all been there, wanting to get our servers up as quickly as possible, overlooking some things that dont really seem important.. however, some of the problems you are having seem to be 'elementary' stuff, which are most probably solved in a lot of manuals and alike, would save us trying to 'guess' at your issue :)
16411
16412 Just as a word of advise, your network layout seems a bit.. well, strange.. A Standard layout is something like the following..
16413
16414 server1.yournetwork.com
16415 server2.yournetwork.com
16416 server3.yournetwork.com
16417 server4.yournetwork.com
16418 services.yournetwork.com
16419
16420 With generally a round robin going between servers 1 to 4, called irc.yournetwork.com (Just a small note, i'm not here to tell you how to run your network, but it might make your life easier)
16421
16422 With all that said, and looking at your problem, i cant really see a reason why services is currently failing to link, i would (personally) call it an IRCd issue, maybe you should concider getting in touch with the UnrealIRCd team, and seeing what they have to say about it :)
16423
16424
16425 /****************************************
16426 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
16427 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
16428 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
16429 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
16430 ****************************************/
16431
16432
16433 /****************************************
16434 * From - Trido <trido@swallegiance.com>
16435 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16436 * Sent - 2004-05-18 02:38:16
16437 * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16438 ****************************************/
16439
16440 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
16441
16442 >I am getting close now. Before, when I tried to start IRC Services, it said
16443 >it did, but it hadn't due to errors. After that last bit of advice, it now
16444 >properly loads up and sits in the background. I am still getting that same
16445 >error message in my log file though, and when I try to connect the services,
16446 >I get the error message:
16447 >
16448 >[11:37:53 am] -irc.swallegiance.com- *** Connect: Server
16449 >services.irc.swallegiance.com is not configured for linking
16450 >
16451 >I don't even know if I am typing the right commands here.
16452 >
16453 >Trido
16454 >
16455 >----- Original Message -----
16456 >From: <Rottman3D@yahoo.com>
16457 >To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16458 >Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:03 AM
16459 >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16460 >
16461 >
16462 >> The web server can not listen on the same port that is being used for the
16463 >> connection. Also remove the port from your servers config file, just use
16464 >> port * for the line otherwise the server will try to connect to services
16465 >> and will fail.
16466 >>
16467 >>
16468 >> At 07:22 PM 5/17/2004, Trido wrote:
16469 >> >That actually worked. I stopped getting error messages. Thanks. :)
16470 >> >Doesn't mean my problems are over though. My new problem is this:
16471 >> >
16472 >> >[May 17 16:17:59 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
16473 >> >[May 17 16:18:00 2004] httpd/main: Listening on :12701
16474 >> >[May 17 16:18:00 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(0): Socket is not
16475 >> >connected
16476 >> >[May 17 16:18:03 2004] Read error from server: Socket is not connected
16477 >> >
16478 >> >Anyone have any ideas?
16479 >> >
16480 >> >Trido
16481 >> >
16482 >> >----- Original Message -----
16483 >> >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
16484 >> >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16485 >> >Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 8:39 AM
16486 >> >Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16487 >> >
16488 >> >
16489 >> > > Try using this as your link block instead
16490 >> > >
16491 >> > > link services.irc.swallegiance.com
16492 >> > > {
16493 >> > > username *;
16494 >> > > hostname 69.28.183.209;
16495 >> > > bind-ip *;
16496 >> > > port 12701;
16497 >> > > hub *;
16498 >> > > password-connect "password";
16499 >> > > password-receive "password";
16500 >> > > class servers;
16501 >> > > };
16502 >> > >
16503 >> > > and in your ircservices.conf
16504 >> > >
16505 >> > > RemoteServer irc.swallegiance.com 12701 "password"
16506 >> > > LocalAddress 69.28.183.209
16507 >> > > ServerName "services.irc.swallegiance.com"
16508 >> > >
16509 >> > >
16510 >> > > That will then force services to use the IP address the IRCd expects
16511 >from
16512 >> >it, obviously replace password with the relevant password.
16513 >> > >
16514 >> > > Also, if your link config is in a seperate file, ensure that it is
16515 >> >included in your main config.
16516 >> > >
16517 >> > > That _SHOULD_ fix your probs.
16518 >> > >
16519 >> > >
16520 >> > >
16521 >> > > /****************************************
16522 >> > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
16523 >> > > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
16524 >> > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
16525 >> > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
16526 >> > > ****************************************/
16527 >> > >
16528 >> > >
16529 >> > > /****************************************
16530 >> > > * From - Mark van Cuijk <mark@phedny.net>
16531 >> > > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
16532 >> ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16533 >> > > * Sent - 2004-05-16 16:52:35
16534 >> > > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16535 >> > > ****************************************/
16536 >> > >
16537 >> > > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
16538 >> > >
16539 >> > > >Trido wrote:
16540 >> > > >
16541 >> > > >>link irc.swallegiance.com
16542 >> > > >>{
16543 >> > > >> username *;
16544 >> > > >> hostname ircservices@69.28.183.209;
16545 >> > > >> bind-ip *;
16546 >> > > >> port 12701;
16547 >> > > >> hub *;
16548 >> > > >> password-connect "password";
16549 >> > > >> password-receive "password";
16550 >> > > >> class servers;
16551 >> > > >> options {
16552 >> > > >> ssl;
16553 >> > > >> zip;
16554 >> > > >> md5;
16555 >> > > >> };
16556 >> > > >>};
16557 >> > > >>
16558 >> > > >>
16559 >> > > >To make this work, your services ServerName must be
16560 >> > > >irc.swallegiance.com. To me it's more likely this is the name of the
16561 >> > > >IRCd server itself, so you should probably change it to
16562 >> > > >services.irc.swallegiance.com or something you like. Anyway, it
16563 >should
16564 >> > > >match the name you specify for ServerName in the ircservices.conf
16565 >file.
16566 >> > > >
16567 >> > > >Then you should make the hostname be only 69.28.183.209, without the
16568 >> > > >username in front of it.
16569 >> > > >Also, the ssl, zip and md5 options should be removed and I suggest to
16570 >> > > >remove the hub line to, since services will not link to any other
16571 >host.
16572 >> > > >
16573 >> > > >Since your log file shows
16574 >> > > >
16575 >> > > >> [May 15 23:29:57 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link
16576 >denied
16577 >> > > >> (No matching link configuration) [@69.28.183.209.6677])
16578 >> > > >
16579 >> > > >I think you're using port 6677 for services and not 12701.
16580 >> > > >
16581 >> > > >- Mark
16582 >> > > >
16583 >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
16584 >> > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16585 >> > > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16586 >> > > >.
16587 >> > >
16588 >> > > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
16589 >> > >
16590 >> > >
16591 >> > >
16592 >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
16593 >> > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16594 >> > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16595 >> > >
16596 >> > >
16597 >> >
16598 >> >
16599 >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
16600 >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16601 >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16602 >>
16603 >>
16604 >>
16605 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
16606 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16607 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16608 >>
16609 >>
16610 >
16611 >
16612 >------------------------------------------------------------------
16613 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16614 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16615 >.
16616
16617 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
16618
16619
16620
16621
16622 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 18 10:59:54 2004
16623 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
16624 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:08 2004
16625 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
16626 In-Reply-To: <40a96d47.74620@mail.achurch.org>
16627 Message-ID: <40a96fa3.37741@achurch.org>
16628
16629 >erm, last time i checked.. there wasnt a CVS repository (or at least hasnt been for the 3 or 4 years i've been on the mailing list)..
16630
16631 Correct, mostly. For a period of time (late 4.5, early 5.0? I can't
16632 recall exactly), I had Services stored in a CVS repository run by a mutual
16633 friend of ours, and he had access to Services as well as the ircd code he
16634 was working on; I'm guessing that he's referring to this repository, as I
16635 don't think I ever actually deleted Services from it, and it's certainly
16636 old enough that the Makefile issue might still be there.
16637
16638 For the curious, I still manage Services using CVS for my own
16639 convenience--CVS makes it a lot easier to try out changes and undo them if
16640 they don't work well--but the repository is stored locally on my machine,
16641 and I don't allow outside access to it.
16642
16643 --Andrew Church
16644 achurch@achurch.org
16645 http://achurch.org/
16646
16647
16648 From trido at swallegiance.com Mon May 17 19:12:48 2004
16649 From: trido at swallegiance.com (Trido)
16650 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16651 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16652 Message-ID: <002801c43c7d$a10c4150$7100a8c0@JUSTIN>
16653
16654 Believe me, I have been trying. You're right, I am new to IRCd and
16655 services. I've been looking in the documentation I can find, as well as
16656 asking questions when I can. I don't know, I musn't be looking in the right
16657 places, especially if these problems are that basic. I have been trying to
16658 contact them via that IRC channel of theirs, but I keep failing that damn
16659 test (Despite the fact that I was positive I had it all right). I'll try
16660 again though.
16661
16662 Trido
16663
16664 ----- Original Message -----
16665 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
16666 To: "ircservices" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16667 Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:03 PM
16668 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16669
16670
16671 > Maybe you should spend some time reading both thorougly through the Manual
16672 Files for Unreal IRCd, and more importantly Services, you seem to be new to
16673 the IRCd world, and i can appreciate that, we have all been there, wanting
16674 to get our servers up as quickly as possible, overlooking some things that
16675 dont really seem important.. however, some of the problems you are having
16676 seem to be 'elementary' stuff, which are most probably solved in a lot of
16677 manuals and alike, would save us trying to 'guess' at your issue :)
16678 >
16679 > Just as a word of advise, your network layout seems a bit.. well,
16680 strange.. A Standard layout is something like the following..
16681 >
16682 > server1.yournetwork.com
16683 > server2.yournetwork.com
16684 > server3.yournetwork.com
16685 > server4.yournetwork.com
16686 > services.yournetwork.com
16687 >
16688 > With generally a round robin going between servers 1 to 4, called
16689 irc.yournetwork.com (Just a small note, i'm not here to tell you how to run
16690 your network, but it might make your life easier)
16691 >
16692 > With all that said, and looking at your problem, i cant really see a
16693 reason why services is currently failing to link, i would (personally) call
16694 it an IRCd issue, maybe you should concider getting in touch with the
16695 UnrealIRCd team, and seeing what they have to say about it :)
16696
16697
16698
16699 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 18 11:06:58 2004
16700 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
16701 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16702 Subject: [IRCServices] Startup problem
16703 In-Reply-To: <40a96f2b.74760@mail.achurch.org>
16704 Message-ID: <40a9714b.63601@achurch.org>
16705
16706 >With all that said, and looking at your problem, i cant really see a
16707 >reason why services is currently failing to link, i would (personally)
16708 >call it an IRCd issue, maybe you should concider getting in touch with
16709 >the UnrealIRCd team, and seeing what they have to say about it :)
16710
16711 One other thing I should mention is that there have been a couple of
16712 cases reported where Services exits immediately with the "socket is not
16713 connected" error message, without any obvious cause. I've seen it once
16714 myself, but I haven't been able to reproduce it. I'm guessing that it's a
16715 timing issue related to the connection to the ircd; until I can find
16716 exactly what's causing it, I'd suggest that if you see that error, just
16717 restart Services and it should go away. (I don't think there have been
16718 any cases of Services suddenly disconnecting once the connection has been
16719 made.)
16720
16721 --Andrew Church
16722 achurch@achurch.org
16723 http://achurch.org/
16724
16725
16726 From Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au Wed May 19 16:48:14 2004
16727 From: Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au (Robin Burchell)
16728 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16729 Subject: [IRCServices] [Module] Botserv coming sometime soon
16730 Message-ID: <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B0B@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
16731
16732 Yes, you may have heard about it but I thought i'd let the news slip here:
16733
16734 I've been working on a botserv module for ircservices, and hope to have a beta version some time in the next week. I spoke to Andrew, and it won't be in the official distribution or anything, but it will be fairly easy to setup (especially if you have some programming knowledge).
16735
16736 All you have to do is:
16737 Replace modules/chanserv/chanserv.h with my chanserv.h
16738 Place all other files in a folder: /modules/botserv
16739 Set up the module name
16740 and away you go.
16741 The one major thing I havent really been able to do so far is database integration. If anyone can help with that, I would greatly appreciate it.
16742
16743 Here's to hoping this message arrives, this is the first time I have used a mailing list.
16744
16745 Yours,
16746 Robin Burchell [w00t]
16747 Administrator, irc.netronet.org
16748 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed May 19 17:57:23 2004
16749 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
16750 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16751 Subject: [IRCServices] [Module] Botserv coming sometime soon
16752 Message-ID: <mailman.58.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16753
16754 hi w00t..
16755 when it comes to databases in services for things like botserv, or other modules, its best to create your own. (Contact me on the insp forums, and i'll see if i can help you out more..)
16756
16757 Just as a matter of interest, how did you manage to bypass the problem with BotServ recieving the relevant information from services? Services arnt designed to join channels, and thus, other services dont get told if they do. Also, how did you manage to parse Private messages? Although you can remove the Deaf modes on services, it causes a LOT of overhead, and is generally better left ignored.
16758
16759 I wouldnt mind viewing a copy of your source at some point, to see how you combatted some of the major problems when it comes to modules like this.
16760
16761 cya :)
16762
16763 /****************************************
16764 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
16765 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
16766 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
16767 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
16768 ****************************************/
16769
16770
16771 /****************************************
16772 * From - Robin Burchell <Robin.Burchell@oxley.nsw.edu.au>
16773 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
16774 * Sent - 2004-05-19 23:48:14
16775 * Subject - [IRCServices] [Module] Botserv coming sometime soon
16776 ****************************************/
16777
16778 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
16779
16780 >Yes, you may have heard about it but I thought i'd let the news slip here:
16781 >
16782 >I've been working on a botserv module for ircservices, and hope to have a beta version some time in the next week. I spoke to Andrew, and it won't be in the official distribution or anything, but it will be fairly easy to setup (especially if you have some programming knowledge).
16783 >
16784 >All you have to do is:
16785 > Replace modules/chanserv/chanserv.h with my chanserv.h
16786 > Place all other files in a folder: /modules/botserv
16787 > Set up the module name
16788 >and away you go.
16789 >The one major thing I havent really been able to do so far is database integration. If anyone can help with that, I would greatly appreciate it.
16790 >
16791 >Here's to hoping this message arrives, this is the first time I have used a mailing list.
16792 >
16793 >Yours,
16794 >Robin Burchell [w00t]
16795 >Administrator, irc.netronet.org
16796 >------------------------------------------------------------------
16797 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16798 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16799 >
16800
16801 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
16802
16803
16804
16805
16806 From Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au Thu May 20 19:24:29 2004
16807 From: Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au (Robin Burchell)
16808 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16809 Subject: [IRCServices] [Feature] Chanserv Access
16810 Message-ID: <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B26@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
16811
16812 Would it be an idea to store who set\modified the access list per person last, ie
16813
16814 on access who by
16815 w00t 100 w00t
16816 zaptan 100 zaptan
16817 scorpz 50 zaptan
16818
16819 etc etc.
16820 Just a thought.
16821
16822 Robin Burchell [w00t]
16823 Administrator, irc.netronet.org
16824 From mark at phedny.net Sat May 29 03:09:13 2004
16825 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
16826 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16827 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
16828 Message-ID: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net>
16829
16830 Hi,
16831
16832 Is there a way, for Services Admins, to check whether a user has a
16833 certain password?
16834 This is because I want to add some interactive pages to my website that
16835 can be used to read and change some NickServ and ChanServ settings.
16836 Currently I created a small bot, that is Services Admin on the network
16837 and is able to perform certain NickServ and ChanServ operations. You
16838 understand I want users to be able to change those settings only after
16839 they entered their password, which the bots needs to check before
16840 performing the requested operation(s).
16841
16842 - Mark
16843
16844
16845 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Sat May 29 04:11:32 2004
16846 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
16847 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16848 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
16849 In-Reply-To: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net>
16850 References: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net>
16851 Message-ID: <1085829091.13443.0.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
16852
16853 Why don't you use GETPASS and compare the output?
16854
16855 Regards;
16856 yusuf
16857
16858 On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 12:09, Mark van Cuijk wrote:
16859 > Hi,
16860 >
16861 > Is there a way, for Services Admins, to check whether a user has a
16862 > certain password?
16863 > This is because I want to add some interactive pages to my website that
16864 > can be used to read and change some NickServ and ChanServ settings.
16865 > Currently I created a small bot, that is Services Admin on the network
16866 > and is able to perform certain NickServ and ChanServ operations. You
16867 > understand I want users to be able to change those settings only after
16868 > they entered their password, which the bots needs to check before
16869 > performing the requested operation(s).
16870 >
16871 > - Mark
16872 >
16873 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
16874 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16875 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16876
16877
16878
16879 From medice at gmx.at Sat May 29 04:14:40 2004
16880 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
16881 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16882 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
16883 In-Reply-To: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net>
16884 References: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net>
16885 Message-ID: <40B870A0.4010101@gmx.at>
16886
16887 /nickserv getpass nick
16888 /chanserv getpass #chan
16889
16890 as long as the pass-encryption is not activated - take a look at the
16891 documentation, config-file-comments and services-inside-help ;)
16892
16893 greets
16894 /medice
16895
16896 Mark van Cuijk wrote:
16897 > Hi,
16898 >
16899 > Is there a way, for Services Admins, to check whether a user has a
16900 > certain password?
16901 > This is because I want to add some interactive pages to my website that
16902 > can be used to read and change some NickServ and ChanServ settings.
16903 > Currently I created a small bot, that is Services Admin on the network
16904 > and is able to perform certain NickServ and ChanServ operations. You
16905 > understand I want users to be able to change those settings only after
16906 > they entered their password, which the bots needs to check before
16907 > performing the requested operation(s).
16908 >
16909 > - Mark
16910 >
16911 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
16912 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
16913 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
16914 >
16915 >
16916
16917
16918
16919 From mark at phedny.net Sat May 29 04:26:59 2004
16920 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
16921 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16922 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
16923 In-Reply-To: <40B870A0.4010101@gmx.at>
16924 References: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net> <40B870A0.4010101@gmx.at>
16925 Message-ID: <40B87383.5050504@phedny.net>
16926
16927 Hi,
16928
16929 > as long as the pass-encryption is not activated - take a look at the
16930 > documentation, config-file-comments and services-inside-help ;)
16931
16932 That is just my problem, pass-encrypting IS enabled.
16933 I'll talk to the other admins about disabling it and requiring every
16934 user to reset their password, but in the meanwhile I'll try finding some
16935 other solution.
16936
16937 - Mark
16938
16939
16940 From medice at gmx.at Sat May 29 04:38:17 2004
16941 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
16942 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16943 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
16944 In-Reply-To: <40B87383.5050504@phedny.net>
16945 References: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net> <40B870A0.4010101@gmx.at>
16946 <40B87383.5050504@phedny.net>
16947 Message-ID: <40B87629.6020301@gmx.at>
16948
16949 Mark van Cuijk wrote:
16950 > That is just my problem, pass-encrypting IS enabled.
16951
16952 Well in this case it is - hm - not good ;)
16953 In fact I get only one terribly awful kind-of-work-around procedure in
16954 mind: let your bot try to identify himself with the given password on
16955 the given nick/chan - if services reply positive - the pass might be the
16956 correct one.
16957 But this one is NOT really elegant and I would consider it a
16958 high-security-risk and identifying for foreign nicks/chans is in my
16959 opinion abusive...
16960
16961 is it too complicate for users to learn some simple commands or to read
16962 the help for getting commands they want?
16963
16964 greets
16965 /medice
16966
16967
16968 From mark at phedny.net Sat May 29 08:53:13 2004
16969 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
16970 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
16971 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
16972 In-Reply-To: <40B87629.6020301@gmx.at>
16973 References: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net>
16974 <40B870A0.4010101@gmx.at> <40B87383.5050504@phedny.net>
16975 <40B87629.6020301@gmx.at>
16976 Message-ID: <40B8B1E9.5080801@phedny.net>
16977
16978 Hi,
16979
16980 > Well in this case it is - hm - not good ;)
16981 > In fact I get only one terribly awful kind-of-work-around procedure in
16982 > mind: let your bot try to identify himself with the given password on
16983 > the given nick/chan - if services reply positive - the pass might be
16984 > the correct one.
16985
16986 The problem with this of course is that the bot must first take the
16987 nickname of that user and that would be a problem if that user is
16988 already online in the network.
16989
16990 > But this one is NOT really elegant and I would consider it a
16991 > high-security-risk and identifying for foreign nicks/chans is in my
16992 > opinion abusive...
16993
16994 When this is only possible for Services Admins, it would be that a risk
16995 (assuming the bot itself is secure enough that no harmfull commands
16996 could leak through).
16997
16998 > is it too complicate for users to learn some simple commands or to
16999 > read the help for getting commands they want?
17000
17001 I agree with you when you say this, including some of the people that
17002 are interested in computers and so, but I also host three game channels
17003 with total n00bs (sorry to express it this way) and since that's the
17004 largest group of all the users, they are my target. I want to make the
17005 page explain itself, with help text next to each field.
17006
17007 Anyway, we agreed on unsetting password encryption and therefore forcing
17008 everybody to set the password again.
17009 When I have some things working, I'll send a notification message so
17010 people how are interested could take a look at it.
17011
17012 - Mark
17013
17014
17015 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat May 29 13:26:43 2004
17016 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
17017 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17018 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17019 Message-ID: <200405292026.i4TKQhw24650@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
17020
17021 i can give you some code to do this which you could put in a module. Email me off the list if you are interested and understand that by applying such code to your services build officially it wont be supported :p
17022
17023 i will provide you with the code but due to being a very busy person at this time i cannot offer to adapt it for your use... this you must do yourself :P
17024
17025 Thanks,
17026 Brain
17027
17028 >Hi,
17029 >
17030 >> Well in this case it is - hm - not good ;)
17031 >> In fact I get only one terribly awful kind-of-work-around procedure in
17032 >> mind: let your bot try to identify himself with the given password on
17033 >> the given nick/chan - if services reply positive - the pass might be
17034 >> the correct one.
17035 >
17036 >The problem with this of course is that the bot must first take the
17037 >nickname of that user and that would be a problem if that user is
17038 >already online in the network.
17039 >
17040 >> But this one is NOT really elegant and I would consider it a
17041 >> high-security-risk and identifying for foreign nicks/chans is in my
17042 >> opinion abusive...
17043 >
17044 >When this is only possible for Services Admins, it would be that a risk
17045 >(assuming the bot itself is secure enough that no harmfull commands
17046 >could leak through).
17047 >
17048 >> is it too complicate for users to learn some simple commands or to
17049 >> read the help for getting commands they want?
17050 >
17051 >I agree with you when you say this, including some of the people that
17052 >are interested in computers and so, but I also host three game channels
17053 >with total n00bs (sorry to express it this way) and since that's the
17054 >largest group of all the users, they are my target. I want to make the
17055 >page explain itself, with help text next to each field.
17056 >
17057 >Anyway, we agreed on unsetting password encryption and therefore forcing
17058 >everybody to set the password again.
17059 >When I have some things working, I'll send a notification message so
17060 >people how are interested could take a look at it.
17061 >
17062 >- Mark
17063 >
17064 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17065 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17066 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17067
17068
17069
17070 From mark at phedny.net Sat May 29 13:36:31 2004
17071 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
17072 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17073 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17074 In-Reply-To: <200405292026.i4TKQhw24650@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
17075 References: <200405292026.i4TKQhw24650@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
17076 Message-ID: <40B8F44F.3030707@phedny.net>
17077
17078 I would be glad to receive some code. Although I'm not familiar with
17079 module programming for ircservices, that's a thing I can learn ;)
17080
17081 Craig Edwards wrote:
17082
17083 >i can give you some code to do this which you could put in a module. Email me off the list if you are interested and understand that by applying such code to your services build officially it wont be supported :p
17084 >
17085 >i will provide you with the code but due to being a very busy person at this time i cannot offer to adapt it for your use... this you must do yourself :P
17086 >
17087 >Thanks,
17088 >Brain
17089 >
17090 >
17091
17092
17093
17094 From mark at phedny.net Sun May 30 10:07:18 2004
17095 From: mark at phedny.net (Mark van Cuijk)
17096 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17097 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17098 In-Reply-To: <40B8B1E9.5080801@phedny.net>
17099 References: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net> <40B870A0.4010101@gmx.at> <40B87383.5050504@phedny.net> <40B87629.6020301@gmx.at>
17100 <40B8B1E9.5080801@phedny.net>
17101 Message-ID: <40BA14C6.60303@phedny.net>
17102
17103 Hi,
17104
17105 Today I got myself familiar with module programming for services and
17106 wrote a module that does what I want.
17107
17108 Although I didn't write any documentation yet, for those who want to
17109 experiment with it the module is available for download:
17110 http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.gz and
17111 http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.bz2
17112
17113 Untar the file into the services source dir and do a make, make install.
17114 Then add "LoadModule testpass/main" to the end of the ircservices.conf
17115 file (at least after loading NickServ / ChanServ).
17116
17117 The TESTPASS command is not added to any HELP command, but is available
17118 for both NickServ and ChanServ:
17119 /msg NickServ TESTPASS <user> <password>
17120 /msg ChanServ TESTPASS <channel> <password>
17121
17122 The commands are only available for Services Admins.
17123
17124 - Mark
17125
17126
17127 From chris at starglade.org Sun May 30 10:15:33 2004
17128 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
17129 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17130 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17131 In-Reply-To: <40BA14C6.60303@phedny.net>
17132 References: <40B86149.3000904@phedny.net> <40B870A0.4010101@gmx.at> <40B87383.5050504@phedny.net> <40B87629.6020301@gmx.at> <40B8B1E9.5080801@phedny.net>
17133 <40BA14C6.60303@phedny.net>
17134 Message-ID: <40BA16B5.6090007@starglade.org>
17135
17136 Mark van Cuijk wrote:
17137 > Although I didn't write any documentation yet, for those who want to
17138 > experiment with it the module is available for download:
17139 > http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.gz and
17140 > http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.bz2
17141
17142 Neither of these URLs is working for me.
17143
17144 Chris
17145 --
17146 Chris Jenkinson
17147 chris@starglade.org
17148
17149
17150
17151 From andrew at wtfigo.co.uk Sun May 30 10:39:02 2004
17152 From: andrew at wtfigo.co.uk (Andrew Kempe)
17153 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17154 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17155 In-Reply-To: <40BA14C6.60303@phedny.net>
17156 Message-ID: <mailman.59.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17157
17158 Hi guys, please can you move this to the coding list.
17159
17160 Thanks, Andrew
17161
17162 > -----Original Message-----
17163 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
17164 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
17165 > Mark van Cuijk
17166 > Sent: 30 May 2004 18:07
17167 > To: IRC Services General Mailing List
17168 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17169 >
17170 > Hi,
17171 >
17172 > Today I got myself familiar with module programming for
17173 > services and wrote a module that does what I want.
17174 >
17175 > Although I didn't write any documentation yet, for those who
17176 > want to experiment with it the module is available for download:
17177 > http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.gz and
17178 > http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.bz2
17179 >
17180 > Untar the file into the services source dir and do a make,
17181 > make install.
17182 > Then add "LoadModule testpass/main" to the end of the
17183 > ircservices.conf file (at least after loading NickServ / ChanServ).
17184 >
17185 > The TESTPASS command is not added to any HELP command, but is
17186 > available for both NickServ and ChanServ:
17187 > /msg NickServ TESTPASS <user> <password> /msg ChanServ
17188 > TESTPASS <channel> <password>
17189 >
17190 > The commands are only available for Services Admins.
17191 >
17192 > - Mark
17193 >
17194 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
17195 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17196 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17197
17198
17199
17200 From achurch at achurch.org Mon May 31 09:13:08 2004
17201 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17202 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17203 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17204 In-Reply-To: <40ba1c72.55342@mail.achurch.org>
17205 Message-ID: <40ba78d0.61730@achurch.org>
17206
17207 >Hi guys, please can you move this to the coding list.
17208
17209 Actually, I think this is reasonable for the main list, as long as it
17210 doesn't get into coding details and the like.
17211
17212 --Andrew Church
17213 achurch@achurch.org
17214 http://achurch.org/
17215
17216 >Thanks, Andrew
17217 >
17218 >> -----Original Message-----
17219 >> From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
17220 >> [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of
17221 >> Mark van Cuijk
17222 >> Sent: 30 May 2004 18:07
17223 >> To: IRC Services General Mailing List
17224 >> Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17225 >>
17226 >> Hi,
17227 >>
17228 >> Today I got myself familiar with module programming for
17229 >> services and wrote a module that does what I want.
17230 >>
17231 >> Although I didn't write any documentation yet, for those who
17232 >> want to experiment with it the module is available for download:
17233 >> http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.gz and
17234 >> http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.bz2
17235 >>
17236 >> Untar the file into the services source dir and do a make,
17237 >> make install.
17238 >> Then add "LoadModule testpass/main" to the end of the
17239 >> ircservices.conf file (at least after loading NickServ / ChanServ).
17240 >>
17241 >> The TESTPASS command is not added to any HELP command, but is
17242 >> available for both NickServ and ChanServ:
17243 >> /msg NickServ TESTPASS <user> <password> /msg ChanServ
17244 >> TESTPASS <channel> <password>
17245 >>
17246 >> The commands are only available for Services Admins.
17247 >>
17248 >> - Mark
17249 >>
17250 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
17251 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17252 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17253 >
17254 >
17255 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17256 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17257 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17258
17259
17260 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun May 30 18:41:00 2004
17261 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
17262 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17263 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17264 Message-ID: <mailman.60.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17265
17266 I feel this needs to be pointed out,
17267
17268 Currently, Nickserv generally kills users after 5 invalid passwords. This module apparently provides a way for users to 'test' passwords without any cause for alarm.
17269
17270 This also means people will be able to brute force passwords using this command.
17271
17272 I thought i would point this out as it can be concidered a threat.
17273
17274 /****************************************
17275 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
17276 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
17277 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
17278 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
17279 ****************************************/
17280
17281
17282 /****************************************
17283 * From - Mark van Cuijk <mark@phedny.net>
17284 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17285 * Sent - 2004-05-30 18:07:18
17286 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17287 ****************************************/
17288
17289 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
17290
17291 >Hi,
17292 >
17293 >Today I got myself familiar with module programming for services and
17294 >wrote a module that does what I want.
17295 >
17296 >Although I didn't write any documentation yet, for those who want to
17297 >experiment with it the module is available for download:
17298 >http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.gz and
17299 >http://www.phedny.net/~mark/testpass.tar.bz2
17300 >
17301 >Untar the file into the services source dir and do a make, make install.
17302 >Then add "LoadModule testpass/main" to the end of the ircservices.conf
17303 >file (at least after loading NickServ / ChanServ).
17304 >
17305 >The TESTPASS command is not added to any HELP command, but is available
17306 >for both NickServ and ChanServ:
17307 >/msg NickServ TESTPASS <user> <password>
17308 >/msg ChanServ TESTPASS <channel> <password>
17309 >
17310 >The commands are only available for Services Admins.
17311 >
17312 >- Mark
17313 >
17314 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17315 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17316 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17317 >.
17318
17319 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
17320
17321
17322
17323
17324 From Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au Sun May 30 19:03:34 2004
17325 From: Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au (Robin Burchell)
17326 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17327 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17328 Message-ID: <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B37@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
17329
17330 Sorry if this isnt a direct reply, damn my outlook web access not allowing TEXT email (groan)
17331 I havent checked the modules themselves, but didnt he say they were limited to Services admins only?
17332
17333
17334 -------
17335 Robin Burchell [w00t]
17336 Administrator, irc.netronet.org
17337 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun May 30 20:51:17 2004
17338 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
17339 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17340 Subject: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17341 Message-ID: <mailman.61.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17342
17343 aah, sorry, missed that bit, disregard my last mail :)
17344
17345 /****************************************
17346 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
17347 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
17348 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
17349 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
17350 ****************************************/
17351
17352
17353 /****************************************
17354 * From - Robin Burchell <Robin.Burchell@oxley.nsw.edu.au>
17355 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17356 * Sent - 2004-05-31 03:03:34
17357 * Subject - RE: Re: [IRCServices] Check password without IDENTIFY
17358 ****************************************/
17359
17360 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
17361
17362 >Sorry if this isnt a direct reply, damn my outlook web access not allowing TEXT email (groan)
17363 >I havent checked the modules themselves, but didnt he say they were limited to Services admins only?
17364 >
17365 >
17366 >-------
17367 >Robin Burchell [w00t]
17368 >Administrator, irc.netronet.org
17369 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17370 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17371 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17372 >
17373
17374 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
17375
17376
17377
17378
17379 From alisor at softhome.net Fri Jun 4 07:47:37 2004
17380 From: alisor at softhome.net (Ali Sor)
17381 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17382 Subject: [IRCServices] Log MEssages
17383 Message-ID: <000c01c44a42$f208daa0$0800000a@citir>
17384
17385 Hello;
17386
17387 I moved my services to new box.
17388 Today services collapse and i looked at the logs and see these mesages at the bottom. I am using services for a long time but it is the first time i see some messages like that at logs.
17389
17390 Anybody know what these mean?
17391
17392
17393 [Jun 04 16:40:21 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
17394 [Jun 04 16:45:01 2004] IRC Services 5.0.31 starting up
17395 [Jun 04 16:45:21 2004] operserv/sline: warning: client IP addresses not available with this IRC server
17396 ...............................
17397 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-68467)
17398 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-68467)
17399 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17400 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17401 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17402 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17403 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17404 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17405 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17406 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17407 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17408 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17409 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17410 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <= wlen (-74611)
17411 .............
17412 -------------- next part --------------
17413 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
17414 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040604/bb29a9aa/attachment.html
17415 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Jun 5 09:20:38 2004
17416 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
17417 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17418 Subject: [IRCServices] message bugs
17419 Message-ID: <200406051620.i55GKcw23689@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
17420
17421 When setting options on another nick, using services admin privilages:
17422
17423 /ns set FlirtBot mainnick RefereeBot
17424 [17:16] -NickServ- Your main nickname has been changed to refereebot.
17425
17426 shouldnt this be "FlirtBot's main nick has been changed to RefereeBot."? Seems a few other messages do this too, i was confused for a second wondering how i'd obtained the mainnick of another user :p
17427
17428 Thanks,
17429 Brain
17430
17431
17432
17433 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Jun 6 18:37:10 2004
17434 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17435 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17436 Subject: [IRCServices] message bugs
17437 In-Reply-To: <200406051620.i55GKcw23689@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
17438 Message-ID: <mailman.62.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17439
17440 --Andrew Church
17441 achurch@achurch.org
17442 http://achurch.org/
17443 Sender: achurch@achurch.org
17444 Message-ID: <40c2e5ea.12064@achurch.org>
17445
17446 When setting options on another nick, using services admin privilages:
17447 >
17448 >/ns set FlirtBot mainnick RefereeBot
17449 >[17:16] -NickServ- Your main nickname has been changed to refereebot.
17450 >
17451 >shouldnt this be "FlirtBot's main nick has been changed to RefereeBot."? Seems a few other messages do this too, i was confused for a second wondering how i'd obtained the mainnick of another user :p
17452 >
17453 >Thanks,
17454 >Brain
17455 >
17456 >
17457 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17458 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17459 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17460
17461
17462 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Jun 6 18:37:51 2004
17463 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17464 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17465 Subject: [IRCServices] Log MEssages
17466 In-Reply-To: <000c01c44a42$f208daa0$0800000a@citir>
17467 Message-ID: <40c2ea3f.12074@achurch.org>
17468
17469 [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <=3D =
17470 >wlen (-68467)
17471
17472 This is apparently a bug in the socket handling code. I haven't been
17473 able to reproduce it; if you do run into it, try restarting Services--the
17474 problem should go away.
17475
17476 --Andrew Church
17477 achurch@achurch.org
17478 http://achurch.org/
17479
17480
17481 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Jun 6 18:57:40 2004
17482 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17483 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17484 Subject: [IRCServices] message bugs
17485 Message-ID: <40c2eac7.12112@achurch.org>
17486
17487 When setting options on another nick, using services admin privilages:
17488 >
17489 >/ns set FlirtBot mainnick RefereeBot
17490 >[17:16] -NickServ- Your main nickname has been changed to refereebot.
17491 >
17492 >shouldnt this be "FlirtBot's main nick has been changed to RefereeBot."? Seems a few other messages do this too, i was confused for a second wondering how i'd obtained the mainnick of another user :p
17493
17494 This is a known issue and is documented in the KnownBugs file (which
17495 probably ought to be in the manual, admittedly).
17496
17497 --Andrew Church
17498 achurch@achurch.org
17499 http://achurch.org/
17500
17501
17502 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Jun 6 19:55:22 2004
17503 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17504 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17505 Subject: [IRCServices] message bugs
17506 In-Reply-To: <40c2eac7.12112@achurch.org>
17507 Message-ID: <40c2f83e.13266@achurch.org>
17508
17509 Apologies for the corrupted messages; there was a minor bug with my
17510 mail server (fixed now).
17511
17512 --Andrew Church
17513 achurch@achurch.org
17514 http://achurch.org/
17515
17516
17517 From alisor at softhome.net Sun Jun 6 15:02:37 2004
17518 From: alisor at softhome.net (Ali Sor)
17519 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17520 Subject: [IRCServices] Log MEssages
17521 References: <40c2ea3f.12074@achurch.org>
17522 Message-ID: <004d01c44c11$fdaf5de0$0800000a@citir>
17523
17524 well it only happens after restarts/shutdowns
17525
17526 ----- Original Message -----
17527 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
17528 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17529 Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 12:37 PM
17530 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Log MEssages
17531
17532
17533 > [Jun 04 16:46:31 2004] sockets: BUG: resize_wbuf(4): size (36864) <=3D =
17534 > >wlen (-68467)
17535 >
17536 > This is apparently a bug in the socket handling code. I haven't been
17537 > able to reproduce it; if you do run into it, try restarting Services--the
17538 > problem should go away.
17539 >
17540 > --Andrew Church
17541 > achurch@achurch.org
17542 > http://achurch.org/
17543 >
17544 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
17545 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17546 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17547
17548
17549
17550 From Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au Sun Jun 6 22:02:41 2004
17551 From: Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au (Robin Burchell)
17552 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17553 Subject: [IRCServices] Weird startup thing
17554 Message-ID: <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B42@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
17555
17556 [14:54] <Zaptan> zaptan@sovereign:/home/zaptan/ircservices>./ircservices -nofork
17557 [14:54] <Zaptan> [Jun 07 00:51:53 2004] IRC Services 1.0.1a starting up
17558 [14:54] <Zaptan> [Jun 07 00:51:53 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(4): Socket is not connected
17559 [14:54] <Zaptan> [Jun 07 00:51:56 2004] Read error from server: Socket is not connected
17560
17561 I dont get this. We are running 5.0.30-- (havent yet upgraded)
17562
17563 Any clues?!
17564
17565 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon Jun 7 09:06:08 2004
17566 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
17567 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17568 Subject: [IRCServices] Weird startup thing
17569 Message-ID: <mailman.63.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17570
17571 errm..
17572
17573 Looking at that startup text, you are either running a modified version of services (1.0.1a?), or an EXTREMELLY old version. If its the first, you probably wont be supported, and are encouraged to download an official services release (from http://www.ircservices.za.net), or if its the latter, visit the forementioned URL and upgrade your services.
17574
17575 /****************************************
17576 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
17577 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
17578 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
17579 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
17580 ****************************************/
17581
17582
17583 /****************************************
17584 * From - Robin Burchell <Robin.Burchell@oxley.nsw.edu.au>
17585 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17586 * Sent - 2004-06-07 06:02:41
17587 * Subject - [IRCServices] Weird startup thing
17588 ****************************************/
17589
17590 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
17591
17592 >[14:54] <Zaptan> zaptan@sovereign:/home/zaptan/ircservices>./ircservices -nofork
17593 >[14:54] <Zaptan> [Jun 07 00:51:53 2004] IRC Services 1.0.1a starting up
17594 >[14:54] <Zaptan> [Jun 07 00:51:53 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(4): Socket is not connected
17595 >[14:54] <Zaptan> [Jun 07 00:51:56 2004] Read error from server: Socket is not connected
17596 >
17597 >I dont get this. We are running 5.0.30-- (havent yet upgraded)
17598 >
17599 >Any clues?!
17600 >
17601 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17602 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17603 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17604 >
17605
17606 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
17607
17608
17609
17610
17611
17612 From chris at unreal-irc.net Mon Jun 7 11:05:22 2004
17613 From: chris at unreal-irc.net (chris@unreal-irc.net)
17614 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17615 Subject: [IRCServices] FW: AKill
17616 Message-ID: <200406071808.i57I8SPt015647@smtp-loh04.proxy.aol.com>
17617
17618 Any akill added on our network results in a massive flood of notices when
17619 the user then attempts to rejoin.
17620
17621
17622
17623 In older versions of services, when an akill was added and the user
17624 attempted to rejoin, we got one notice telling us the user had been akilled
17625 then nothing more. How on earth do we stop the flooding of services with
17626 all these notices each time a user tries to rejoin and gets akilled?
17627
17628 -------------- next part --------------
17629 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
17630 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040607/3ee0a1cd/attachment.htm
17631 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jun 8 09:55:01 2004
17632 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17633 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17634 Subject: [IRCServices] FW: AKill
17635 In-Reply-To: <200406071808.i57I8SPt015647@smtp-loh04.proxy.aol.com>
17636 Message-ID: <40c50ec2.27600@achurch.org>
17637
17638 RTFM (FAQ F.9), and don't use HTML when posting to the list.
17639
17640 --Andrew Church
17641 achurch@achurch.org
17642 http://achurch.org/
17643
17644 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
17645 >
17646 >--===============1162681352==
17647 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
17648 > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910"
17649 >
17650 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
17651 >
17652 >------=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910
17653 >Content-Type: text/plain;
17654 > charset="us-ascii"
17655 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
17656 >
17657 >Any akill added on our network results in a massive flood of notices when
17658 >the user then attempts to rejoin.
17659 >
17660 >
17661 >
17662 >In older versions of services, when an akill was added and the user
17663 >attempted to rejoin, we got one notice telling us the user had been akilled
17664 >then nothing more. How on earth do we stop the flooding of services with
17665 >all these notices each time a user tries to rejoin and gets akilled?
17666 >
17667 >
17668 >------=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910
17669 >Content-Type: text/html;
17670 > charset="us-ascii"
17671 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
17672 >
17673 ><html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
17674 >xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
17675 >xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
17676 >
17677 ><head>
17678 ><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
17679 >charset=3Dus-ascii">
17680 ><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
17681 ><style>
17682 ><!--
17683 > /* Style Definitions */
17684 > p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
17685 > {margin:0cm;
17686 > margin-bottom:.0001pt;
17687 > font-size:12.0pt;
17688 > font-family:"Times New Roman";}
17689 >a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
17690 > {color:blue;
17691 > text-decoration:underline;}
17692 >a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
17693 > {color:purple;
17694 > text-decoration:underline;}
17695 >span.EmailStyle17
17696 > {mso-style-type:personal;
17697 > font-family:Arial;
17698 > color:windowtext;}
17699 >span.EmailStyle18
17700 > {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
17701 > font-family:Arial;
17702 > color:navy;}
17703 >@page Section1
17704 > {size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
17705 > margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
17706 >div.Section1
17707 > {page:Section1;}
17708 >-->
17709 ></style>
17710 >
17711 ></head>
17712 >
17713 ><body lang=3DEN-GB link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>
17714 >
17715 ><div class=3DSection1>
17716 >
17717 ><p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
17718 >style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
17719 >font-family:Arial'>Any akill added on our network results in a massive =
17720 >flood of
17721 >notices when the user then attempts to =
17722 >rejoin.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
17723 >
17724 ><p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
17725 >style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
17726 >font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>
17727 >
17728 ><p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
17729 >style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
17730 >font-family:Arial'>In older versions of services, when an akill was =
17731 >added and
17732 >the user attempted to rejoin, we got one notice telling us the user had =
17733 >been akilled
17734 >then nothing more.&nbsp; How on earth do we stop the flooding of =
17735 >services with
17736 >all these notices each time a user tries to rejoin and gets =
17737 >akilled?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
17738 >
17739 ></div>
17740 >
17741 ></body>
17742 >
17743 ></html>
17744 >
17745 >------=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910--
17746 >
17747 >
17748 >
17749 >
17750 >--===============1162681352==
17751 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
17752 >MIME-Version: 1.0
17753 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
17754 >Content-Disposition: inline
17755 >
17756 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17757 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17758 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17759 >
17760 >--===============1162681352==--
17761 >
17762 >
17763 >
17764
17765
17766 From Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au Mon Jun 7 18:02:24 2004
17767 From: Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au (Robin Burchell)
17768 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17769 Subject: [IRCServices] Weird startup thing
17770 Message-ID: <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B43@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
17771
17772 That's what throws me--
17773
17774 We are using 5.0.30 vanilla-- yet it reported 1.0.1a!?!
17775 Craig, cmon its me here, w00t! I didnt even USE ircservices till you told me about it
17776
17777 The problem seems to have resolved itself-- we tried ./ircservices -debug and the problem vanished...
17778
17779 Will keep you all posted.
17780
17781 Robin Burchell [w00t]
17782 Administrator, irc.netronet.org
17783 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jun 8 09:58:18 2004
17784 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17785 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17786 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.32 released
17787 Message-ID: <40c50fa8.27635@achurch.org>
17788
17789 Services 5.0.32 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
17790
17791 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
17792
17793 6269c6f7a6f73b577f23df7e84612c31 ircservices-5.0.32.tar.gz
17794 d1677618884bdc517933ffbd95d32b3a ircservices-5.0.32.diff.gz
17795 ded4e8e85224be005789e969662805b0 ircservices-5.0.32-1.i386.rpm
17796 171a7badeebb4e6b617a5580e43dc38e ircservices_5.0.32-1_i386.deb
17797
17798 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
17799
17800 This release includes updated support for the most recent versions of
17801 the Unreal and Bahamut IRC servers, in addition to the usual bug fixes and
17802 a minor internal change in the ChanServ module interface.
17803
17804 PLEASE NOTE that, as announced earlier, Bahamut versions earlier than
17805 1.8.0 are no longer supported as of this release of Services. If you are
17806 using Bahamut, you MUST upgrade all of your servers to Bahamut 1.8.0 at the
17807 same time you upgrade Services. I apologize for the inconvenience.
17808
17809 Changes in version 5.0.32
17810 -------------------------
17811 2004/06/07 Updated Unreal protocol module for Unreal 3.2.1.
17812 2004/05/24 get_access() (which returns a user's access level on a
17813 channel) is now exported by the chanserv/main module.
17814 2004/05/18 -z (insecure) users can no longer enter channels locked to
17815 +z on Unreal. Reported by Dionisios K.
17816 <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
17817 2004/05/14 Fixed failure to clear ban exceptions on autokick.
17818 Reported by Eric Murphy <emurphy@sporked.us>
17819 2004/05/12 Updated Bahamut protocol module for Bahamut 1.8.0. Support
17820 for 1.4.x has been removed.
17821 2004/05/07 Fixed errors in OperServ SESSIONS and EXCEPTIONS help text.
17822 Reported by Elijah <admin@nevernet.net>
17823 2004/05/04 Fixed harmless compilation warning in database/version4
17824 module. Reported by Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
17825
17826 --Andrew Church
17827 achurch@achurch.org
17828 http://achurch.org/
17829
17830
17831 From chris at unreal-irc.net Tue Jun 8 07:21:54 2004
17832 From: chris at unreal-irc.net (chris@unreal-irc.net)
17833 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
17834 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: IRCServices Digest, Vol 18, Issue 4
17835 In-Reply-To: <200406081001.i58A11727671@earl.vwe.net>
17836 Message-ID: <200406081425.i58EP2kh011454@smtp-loh04.proxy.aol.com>
17837
17838 When a user gets akilled due to session limiting I do not expect services to
17839 tell me about it every time the user attempts to reconnect.
17840
17841 Unfortunately, FAQ F9 does not address this.
17842
17843 ----
17844 Message: 2
17845 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:05:22 +0100
17846 From: <chris@unreal-irc.net>
17847 Subject: [IRCServices] FW: AKill
17848 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
17849 Message-ID: <200406071808.i57I8SPt015647@smtp-loh04.proxy.aol.com>
17850 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
17851
17852 Any akill added on our network results in a massive flood of notices when
17853 the user then attempts to rejoin.
17854
17855
17856
17857 In older versions of services, when an akill was added and the user
17858 attempted to rejoin, we got one notice telling us the user had been akilled
17859 then nothing more. How on earth do we stop the flooding of services with
17860 all these notices each time a user tries to rejoin and gets akilled?
17861
17862 -------------- next part --------------
17863 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
17864 URL:
17865 http://www.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040607/3ee
17866 0a1cd/attachment-0001.html
17867
17868 ------------------------------
17869
17870 Message: 3
17871 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 09:55:01 JST
17872 From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
17873 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] FW: AKill
17874 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
17875 Message-ID: <40c50ec2.27600@achurch.org>
17876 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
17877
17878 RTFM (FAQ F.9), and don't use HTML when posting to the list.
17879
17880 --Andrew Church
17881 achurch@achurch.org
17882 http://achurch.org/
17883
17884 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
17885 >
17886 >--===============1162681352==
17887 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
17888 > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910"
17889 >
17890 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
17891 >
17892 >------=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910
17893 >Content-Type: text/plain;
17894 > charset="us-ascii"
17895 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
17896 >
17897 >Any akill added on our network results in a massive flood of notices when
17898 >the user then attempts to rejoin.
17899 >
17900 >
17901 >
17902 >In older versions of services, when an akill was added and the user
17903 >attempted to rejoin, we got one notice telling us the user had been akilled
17904 >then nothing more. How on earth do we stop the flooding of services with
17905 >all these notices each time a user tries to rejoin and gets akilled?
17906 >
17907 >
17908 >------=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910
17909 >Content-Type: text/html;
17910 > charset="us-ascii"
17911 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
17912 >
17913 ><html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
17914 >xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
17915 >xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
17916 >
17917 ><head>
17918 ><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
17919 >charset=3Dus-ascii">
17920 ><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
17921 ><style>
17922 ><!--
17923 > /* Style Definitions */
17924 > p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
17925 > {margin:0cm;
17926 > margin-bottom:.0001pt;
17927 > font-size:12.0pt;
17928 > font-family:"Times New Roman";}
17929 >a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
17930 > {color:blue;
17931 > text-decoration:underline;}
17932 >a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
17933 > {color:purple;
17934 > text-decoration:underline;}
17935 >span.EmailStyle17
17936 > {mso-style-type:personal;
17937 > font-family:Arial;
17938 > color:windowtext;}
17939 >span.EmailStyle18
17940 > {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
17941 > font-family:Arial;
17942 > color:navy;}
17943 >@page Section1
17944 > {size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
17945 > margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
17946 >div.Section1
17947 > {page:Section1;}
17948 >-->
17949 ></style>
17950 >
17951 ></head>
17952 >
17953 ><body lang=3DEN-GB link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>
17954 >
17955 ><div class=3DSection1>
17956 >
17957 ><p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
17958 >style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
17959 >font-family:Arial'>Any akill added on our network results in a massive =
17960 >flood of
17961 >notices when the user then attempts to =
17962 >rejoin.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
17963 >
17964 ><p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
17965 >style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
17966 >font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>
17967 >
17968 ><p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
17969 >style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
17970 >font-family:Arial'>In older versions of services, when an akill was =
17971 >added and
17972 >the user attempted to rejoin, we got one notice telling us the user had =
17973 >been akilled
17974 >then nothing more.&nbsp; How on earth do we stop the flooding of =
17975 >services with
17976 >all these notices each time a user tries to rejoin and gets =
17977 >akilled?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
17978 >
17979 ></div>
17980 >
17981 ></body>
17982 >
17983 ></html>
17984 >
17985 >------=_NextPart_000_0129_01C44CC2.63AC2910--
17986 >
17987 >
17988 >
17989 >
17990 >--===============1162681352==
17991 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
17992 >MIME-Version: 1.0
17993 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
17994 >Content-Disposition: inline
17995 >
17996 >------------------------------------------------------------------
17997 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
17998 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
17999 >
18000 >--===============1162681352==--
18001 >
18002 >
18003 >
18004
18005
18006
18007 ------------------------------
18008
18009 Message: 4
18010 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:02:24 +1000
18011 From: "Robin Burchell" <Robin.Burchell@oxley.nsw.edu.au>
18012 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Weird startup thing
18013 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
18014 Message-ID:
18015
18016 <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B43@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
18017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
18018
18019 That's what throws me--
18020
18021 We are using 5.0.30 vanilla-- yet it reported 1.0.1a!?!
18022 Craig, cmon its me here, w00t! I didnt even USE ircservices till you told me
18023 about it
18024
18025 The problem seems to have resolved itself-- we tried ./ircservices -debug
18026 and the problem vanished...
18027
18028 Will keep you all posted.
18029
18030 Robin Burchell [w00t]
18031 Administrator, irc.netronet.org
18032
18033 ------------------------------
18034
18035 Message: 5
18036 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 09:58:18 JST
18037 From: achurch@achurch.org (Andrew Church)
18038 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.32 released
18039 To: services <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
18040 Message-ID: <40c50fa8.27635@achurch.org>
18041 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
18042
18043 Services 5.0.32 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
18044
18045 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
18046
18047 6269c6f7a6f73b577f23df7e84612c31 ircservices-5.0.32.tar.gz
18048 d1677618884bdc517933ffbd95d32b3a ircservices-5.0.32.diff.gz
18049 ded4e8e85224be005789e969662805b0 ircservices-5.0.32-1.i386.rpm
18050 171a7badeebb4e6b617a5580e43dc38e ircservices_5.0.32-1_i386.deb
18051
18052 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
18053
18054 This release includes updated support for the most recent versions of
18055 the Unreal and Bahamut IRC servers, in addition to the usual bug fixes and
18056 a minor internal change in the ChanServ module interface.
18057
18058 PLEASE NOTE that, as announced earlier, Bahamut versions earlier than
18059 1.8.0 are no longer supported as of this release of Services. If you are
18060 using Bahamut, you MUST upgrade all of your servers to Bahamut 1.8.0 at the
18061 same time you upgrade Services. I apologize for the inconvenience.
18062
18063 Changes in version 5.0.32
18064 -------------------------
18065 2004/06/07 Updated Unreal protocol module for Unreal 3.2.1.
18066 2004/05/24 get_access() (which returns a user's access level on a
18067 channel) is now exported by the chanserv/main module.
18068 2004/05/18 -z (insecure) users can no longer enter channels locked to
18069 +z on Unreal. Reported by Dionisios K.
18070 <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
18071 2004/05/14 Fixed failure to clear ban exceptions on autokick.
18072 Reported by Eric Murphy <emurphy@sporked.us>
18073 2004/05/12 Updated Bahamut protocol module for Bahamut 1.8.0. Support
18074 for 1.4.x has been removed.
18075 2004/05/07 Fixed errors in OperServ SESSIONS and EXCEPTIONS help text.
18076 Reported by Elijah <admin@nevernet.net>
18077 2004/05/04 Fixed harmless compilation warning in database/version4
18078 module. Reported by Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
18079
18080 --Andrew Church
18081 achurch@achurch.org
18082 http://achurch.org/
18083
18084
18085
18086 ------------------------------
18087
18088 _______________________________________________
18089 IRCServices mailing list
18090 IRCServices@ircservices.za.net
18091 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
18092
18093
18094 End of IRCServices Digest, Vol 18, Issue 4
18095 ******************************************
18096
18097
18098
18099
18100 From medice at gmx.at Tue Jun 8 15:46:48 2004
18101 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
18102 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18103 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: IRCServices Digest, Vol 18, Issue 4
18104 In-Reply-To: <200406081425.i58EP2kh011454@smtp-loh04.proxy.aol.com>
18105 References: <200406081425.i58EP2kh011454@smtp-loh04.proxy.aol.com>
18106 Message-ID: <40C641D8.5010503@gmx.at>
18107
18108 chris@unreal-irc.net wrote:
18109 > When a user gets akilled due to session limiting I do not expect services to
18110 > tell me about it every time the user attempts to reconnect.
18111 >
18112 > Unfortunately, FAQ F9 does not address this.
18113 >
18114
18115 You might not expect it, 'cos services are not akilling users immediatly
18116 on session limit exeeding, but killing (on a real look at the messages
18117 by reading or some similar kind of cognitive sensations you might find
18118 "kill" instead off "akill" / "gline" or anything else).
18119 Exceeding users are usually killed several times and on continuing the
18120 excess, they are akilled finally for some time. That's the way it works
18121 on every services-packages I know...
18122
18123 greets
18124 /medice
18125
18126
18127 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jun 9 09:36:21 2004
18128 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
18129 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18130 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: IRCServices Digest, Vol 18, Issue 4
18131 In-Reply-To: <200406081425.i58EP2kh011454@smtp-loh04.proxy.aol.com>
18132 Message-ID: <40c65c6d.31007@achurch.org>
18133
18134 >When a user gets akilled due to session limiting I do not expect services to
18135 >tell me about it every time the user attempts to reconnect.
18136 >
18137 >Unfortunately, FAQ F9 does not address this.
18138
18139 Yes, it does. If you check your IRC server (and you should get
18140 relevant server notices if you're an operator), you'll see that no AKILLs
18141 (or GLINEs, depending on what IRC server you're using) are being added to
18142 the server itself, and Services is simply issuing a KILL every time the
18143 user connects. You should also find a notice in your ircservices.log to
18144 the effect that AKILLs/GLINEs cannot be added because autokill exclusions
18145 are enabled.
18146
18147 I'll update the FAQ to clarify this point.
18148
18149 --Andrew Church
18150 achurch@achurch.org
18151 http://achurch.org/
18152
18153
18154 From mamfelt at acm.org Mon Jun 14 01:33:27 2004
18155 From: mamfelt at acm.org (Michael Felt)
18156 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18157 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmentation Error at startup with database load
18158 Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.0.20040614103223.027b1288@mail>
18159
18160 Note: if the database files are removed, ircservices startups and
18161 communicates with bahamut with no problems.
18162 The core dump occurs on a restart.
18163
18164 1. IRC Version
18165 [Jun 14 01:48:32 2004] IRC Services 5.0.32 starting up
18166
18167 HARDWARE/OS: PowerIV, 64 bit, AIX 5.2
18168 Compiled with no special problems using gcc 3.3.2 downloaded from BULL
18169 freeware.gcc.rte 3.3.2.0 C F gcc version 3.3.2
18170
18171 p.s. I had alomst gotten it ported to AIX xlC compiler, but also ran into
18172 problems with __builtin* functions.
18173 Apparantly only GCC has those.
18174
18175 2. NA atm (bahamut 1.8)
18176
18177 3. Basic error: core dump, segmentation error
18178 Segmentation fault in load_one_serverstats at line 2316 in file
18179 "modules/database/version4.c"
18180 2316 ss->t_join = tmp32;
18181
18182 4.
18183 (dbx) list 2305, 2320
18184 2305 static ServerStats *load_one_serverstats(dbFILE *f)
18185 2306 {
18186 2307 ServerStats *ss;
18187 2308 char *servername;
18188 2309 int32 tmp32;
18189 2310
18190 2311 SAFE(read_string(&servername, f));
18191 2312 ss = new_serverstats(servername);
18192 2313 free(servername);
18193 2314 servername = NULL;
18194 2315 SAFE(read_int32(&tmp32, f));
18195 2316 ss->t_join = tmp32;
18196 2317 SAFE(read_int32(&tmp32, f)); /* t_quit */
18197 2318 /* Avoid join>=quit staying true on load (which would indicate
18198 that the
18199 2319 * server is online even before any server connections are
18200 processed) */
18201 2320 ss->t_quit = time(NULL)-1;
18202 (dbx)
18203 ===
18204 Basically, new_serverstats return value is not properly returned.
18205 ===
18206 more detail
18207 (dbx) stop at 2312
18208 [2] stop at "version4.c":2312
18209 (dbx) rerun
18210 [ /usr/local/sbin/ircservices ]
18211 [2] stopped in load_one_serverstats at line 2312 in file
18212 "modules/database/version4.c"
18213 2312 ss = new_serverstats(servername);
18214 (dbx) where
18215 load_one_serverstats(f = 0x2008c668), line 2312 in "version4.c"
18216 open_statserv_db(dbname = "stats.db"), line 2377 in "version4.c"
18217 init_module_statserv_main(??), line 622 in "main.c"
18218 internal_init_module(??), line 388 in "modules.c"
18219 load_module(??), line 417 in "modules.c"
18220 unnamed block $b64, line 848 in "init.c"
18221 init.init(??, ??), line 848 in "init.c"
18222 main.main(ac = ??, av = 0x2ff22b04, envp = 0x2ff22b0c), line 225 in "main.c"
18223 (dbx) dump
18224 load_one_serverstats(f = 0x2008c668), line 2312 in "version4.c"
18225 servername = "Ascendent.tdzk"
18226 ss = (nil)
18227 tmp32 = 536944164
18228 (dbx) registers
18229 $r0:0x1001d27c $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x00000000
18230 $r4:0x00000fe9 $r5:0x201c56e7 $r6:0x6e64656e $r7:0x742e7464
18231 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00000000 $r10:0xf01c5f34 $r11:0x00000000
18232 $r12:0x1001f9c0 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18233 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18234 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18235 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18236 $r28:0x2008c488 $r29:0x00000001 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x00000000
18237 $iar:0x1001d288 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x28222244 $link:0x1001d27c
18238 $ctr:0xd01f0278 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18239 Condition status = 0:e 1:l 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:g 7:g
18240 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18241 in load_one_serverstats at line 2312 in file "modules/database/version4.c"
18242 0x1001d288 (load_one_serverstats+0x30) 812206cc lwz r9,0x6cc(r2)
18243 (dbx) whatis ss
18244 register ServerStats *ss;
18245 (dbx)
18246 ====
18247 (dbx) step
18248 [2]
18249 Interrupt in load_one_serverstats at line 2312 in file
18250 "modules/database/version4.c"
18251 2312 ss = new_serverstats(servername);
18252 (dbx) step
18253
18254 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at line 189 in file
18255 "modules/database/extsyms.c"
18256 189 IMPORT_FUNC("statserv/main", module_statserv, new_serverstats);
18257 (dbx)
18258 , etc..
18259 ====
18260 2312 ss = new_serverstats(servername);
18261 (dbx) registers
18262 $r0:0x1001d2ac $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x00008080
18263 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18264 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18265 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18266 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18267 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18268 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18269 $r28:0x2008c488 $r29:0x00000001 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x00000000
18270 $iar:0x1001d2ac $msr:0x0000d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x1001d2ac
18271 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18272 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18273 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18274 in load_one_serverstats at line 2312 in file "modules/database/version4.c"
18275 0x1001d2ac (load_one_serverstats+0x54) 80410014 lwz r2,0x14(r1)
18276
18277 (dbx) / ss
18278 2316 ss->t_join = tmp32;
18279 (dbx) stepi
18280 stopped in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2b0
18281 0x1001d2b0 (load_one_serverstats+0x58) 7c7f1b78 mr r31,r3
18282 (dbx) stepi
18283 stopped in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2b4
18284 0x1001d2b4 (load_one_serverstats+0x5c) 80610038 lwz r3,0x38(r1)
18285 (dbx) print ss
18286 0x00008080
18287
18288 ABOVE it seems that ss is finally getting it's value (in r31, was nil, now
18289 0x0008080 (from r3)
18290 (dbx) registers
18291 $r0:0x1001d2ac $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x2008b0c8
18292 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18293 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18294 $r12:0xf01b401c $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18295 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18296 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18297 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18298 $r28:0x2008c488 $r29:0x00000001 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x00008080
18299 $iar:0x10004344 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x1001d2bc
18300 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18301 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18302 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18303 ====
18304
18305 In smaller steps I come to this code:
18306 stopped in new_serverstats at line 377 in file "modules/statserv/main.c"
18307 377 {
18308 (dbx) where
18309 new_serverstats(servername = "Ascendent.tdzk"), line 377 in "main.c"
18310 __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub(), line 189 in "extsyms.c"
18311 load_one_serverstats(f = 0x2008c668), line 2312 in "version4.c"
18312 open_statserv_db(dbname = "stats.db"), line 2377 in "version4.c"
18313 init_module_statserv_main(module_ = ??), line 622 in "main.c"
18314 internal_init_module(module = 0x2008c3a8), line 388 in "modules.c"
18315 load_module(modulename = "statserv/main"), line 417 in "modules.c"
18316 unnamed block $b64, line 848 in "init.c"
18317 init.init(??, ??), line 848 in "init.c"
18318 main.main(ac = ??, av = 0x2ff22b04, envp = 0x2ff22b0c), line 225 in "main.c"
18319 (dbx) list 370, 390
18320 370
18321 371 /* Create a new ServerStats structure for the given server name
18322 and return
18323 372 * it. Always successful.
18324 373 */
18325 374
18326 375 EXPORT_FUNC(new_serverstats)
18327 376 ServerStats *new_serverstats(const char *servername)
18328 377 {
18329 378 ServerStats *ss;
18330 379
18331 380 ss = scalloc(sizeof(*ss), 1);
18332 381 ss->name = sstrdup(servername);
18333 382 return ss;
18334 383 }
18335 384
18336 385
18337 /*************************************************************************/
18338
18339 And then single stepping....
18340 (watch for mr r31,r3 (that incorrectly loads the r31 (ss) value.
18341
18342 ====
18343 (dbx) stop at 383
18344 [7] stop at "modules/statserv/main.c":383
18345 (dbx) cont
18346 [7] stopped in new_serverstats at line 383 in file "modules/statserv/main.c"
18347 383 }
18348 (dbx) dump
18349 new_serverstats(servername = "Ascendent.tdzk"), line 383 in "main.c"
18350 ss = 0x2008b658
18351 (dbx) registers
18352 $r0:0x2008b568 $stkp:0x2ff22648 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x2008b568
18353 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18354 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18355 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18356 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18357 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18358 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18359 $r28:0x2008b0c8 $r29:0x2008b658 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x2ff22698
18360 $iar:0x1007eb28 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x1007eb1c
18361 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18362 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18363 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18364 in new_serverstats at line 383 in file "modules/statserv/main.c"
18365 0x1007eb28 (new_serverstats+0x40) 7fa3eb78 mr r3,r29
18366 (dbx) stepi
18367 stopped in unnamed block $b916 at 0x1007eb2c
18368 0x1007eb2c ($b916) 901d0010 stw r0,0x10(r29)
18369 (dbx) stepi
18370 stopped in unnamed block $b916 at 0x1007eb30
18371 0x1007eb30 ($b916+0x4) 80010008 lwz r0,0x8(r1)
18372 (dbx) stepi
18373 stopped in unnamed block $b916 at 0x1007eb34
18374 0x1007eb34 ($b916+0x8) 8381fff0 lwz r28,-16(r1)
18375 (dbx) stepi
18376 stopped in unnamed block $b916 at 0x1007eb38
18377 0x1007eb38 ($b916+0xc) 7c0803a6 mtlr r0
18378 (dbx) stepi
18379 stopped in unnamed block $b916 at 0x1007eb3c
18380 0x1007eb3c ($b916+0x10) 83a1fff4 lwz r29,-12(r1)
18381 (dbx) stepi
18382 stopped in unnamed block $b916 at 0x1007eb40
18383 0x1007eb40 ($b916+0x14) 4e800020 blr
18384 (dbx) stepi
18385 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fb8
18386 0x10020fb8 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x11c)
18387 80410014 lwz r2,0x14(r1)
18388 (dbx) registers
18389 $r0:0x10020fb8 $stkp:0x2ff22648 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x2008b658
18390 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18391 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18392 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18393 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18394 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18395 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18396 $r28:0x20015008 $r29:0x20003e30 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x2ff22698
18397 $iar:0x10020fb8 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x10020fb8
18398 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18399 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18400 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18401 in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fb8
18402 0x10020fb8 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x11c)
18403 80410014 lwz r2,0x14(r1)
18404 (dbx) stepi
18405 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fbc
18406 0x10020fbc (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x120)
18407 907f00c8 stw r3,0xc8(r31)
18408 (dbx) registers
18409 $r0:0x10020fb8 $stkp:0x2ff22648 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x2008b658
18410 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18411 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18412 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18413 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18414 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18415 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18416 $r28:0x20015008 $r29:0x20003e30 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x2ff22698
18417 $iar:0x10020fbc $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x10020fb8
18418 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18419 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18420 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18421 in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fbc
18422 0x10020fbc (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x120)
18423 907f00c8 stw r3,0xc8(r31)
18424 (dbx) stepi
18425 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fc0
18426 0x10020fc0 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x124)
18427 909f00cc stw r4,0xcc(r31)
18428 (dbx) registers
18429 $r0:0x10020fb8 $stkp:0x2ff22648 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x2008b658
18430 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18431 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18432 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18433 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18434 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18435 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18436 $r28:0x20015008 $r29:0x20003e30 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x2ff22698
18437 $iar:0x10020fc0 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x10020fb8
18438 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18439 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18440 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18441 in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fc0
18442 0x10020fc0 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x124)
18443 909f00cc stw r4,0xcc(r31)
18444 (dbx) stepi
18445 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fc4
18446 0x10020fc4 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x128)
18447 d83f00d0 stfd fr1,0xd0(r31)
18448 (dbx) stepi
18449 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fc8
18450 0x10020fc8 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x12c)
18451 803f00dc lwz r1,0xdc(r31)
18452 (dbx) stepi
18453 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fcc
18454 0x10020fcc (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x130)
18455 801f00d8 lwz r0,0xd8(r31)
18456 (dbx) stepi
18457 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fd0
18458 0x10020fd0 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x134)
18459 90010000 stw r0,0x0(r1)
18460 (dbx) stepi
18461 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fd4
18462 0x10020fd4 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x138)
18463 80210000 lwz r1,0x0(r1)
18464 (dbx) stepi
18465 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fd8
18466 0x10020fd8 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x13c)
18467 807f00c8 lwz r3,0xc8(r31)
18468 (dbx) registers
18469 $r0:0x2ff22788 $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x2008b658
18470 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18471 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18472 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18473 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18474 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18475 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18476 $r28:0x20015008 $r29:0x20003e30 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x2ff22698
18477 $iar:0x10020fd8 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x10020fb8
18478 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18479 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18480 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18481 in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fd8
18482 0x10020fd8 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x13c)
18483 807f00c8 lwz r3,0xc8(r31)
18484 (dbx) stepi
18485 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fdc
18486 0x10020fdc (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x140)
18487 809f00cc lwz r4,0xcc(r31)
18488 (dbx) stepi
18489 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fe0
18490 0x10020fe0 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x144) 7d234b78 mr r3,r9
18491 (dbx) registers
18492 $r0:0x2ff22788 $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x2008b658
18493 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18494 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18495 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18496 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18497 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18498 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18499 $r28:0x20015008 $r29:0x20003e30 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x2ff22698
18500 $iar:0x10020fe0 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x10020fb8
18501 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18502 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18503 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18504 in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fe0
18505 0x10020fe0 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x144) 7d234b78 mr r3,r9
18506 (dbx) stepi
18507 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fe4
18508 0x10020fe4 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x148)
18509 80010008 lwz r0,0x8(r1)
18510 (dbx) registers
18511 $r0:0x2ff22788 $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x00008080
18512 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18513 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18514 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18515 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18516 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18517 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18518 $r28:0x20015008 $r29:0x20003e30 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x2ff22698
18519 $iar:0x10020fe4 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x10020fb8
18520 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18521 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18522 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18523 in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fe4
18524 0x10020fe4 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x148)
18525 80010008 lwz r0,0x8(r1)
18526 (dbx) stepi
18527 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fe8
18528 0x10020fe8 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x14c)
18529 c83f00d0 lfd fr1,0xd0(r31)
18530 (dbx) stepi
18531 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020fec
18532 0x10020fec (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x150) 7c0803a6 mtlr r0
18533 (dbx) stepi
18534 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020ff0
18535 0x10020ff0 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x154)
18536 8381fff0 lwz r28,-16(r1)
18537 (dbx) stepi
18538 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020ff4
18539 0x10020ff4 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x158)
18540 83a1fff4 lwz r29,-12(r1)
18541 (dbx) stepi
18542 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020ff8
18543 0x10020ff8 (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x15c)
18544 83e1fffc lwz r31,-4(r1)
18545 (dbx) stepi
18546 stopped in __dblocal_new_serverstats_stub at 0x10020ffc
18547 0x10020ffc (__dblocal_new_serverstats_stub+0x160) 4e800020 blr
18548 (dbx) stepi
18549 stopped in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2ac
18550 0x1001d2ac (load_one_serverstats+0x54) 80410014 lwz r2,0x14(r1)
18551 (dbx) registers
18552 $r0:0x1001d2ac $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x00008080
18553 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18554 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18555 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18556 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18557 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18558 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18559 $r28:0x2008c488 $r29:0x00000001 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x00000000
18560 $iar:0x1001d2ac $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x1001d2ac
18561 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18562 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18563 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18564 in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2ac
18565 0x1001d2ac (load_one_serverstats+0x54) 80410014 lwz r2,0x14(r1)
18566 (dbx) stepi
18567 stopped in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2b0
18568 0x1001d2b0 (load_one_serverstats+0x58) 7c7f1b78 mr r31,r3
18569 (dbx) stepi
18570 stopped in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2b4
18571 0x1001d2b4 (load_one_serverstats+0x5c) 80610038 lwz r3,0x38(r1)
18572 (dbx) registers
18573 $r0:0x1001d2ac $stkp:0x2ff22788 $toc:0x2001508c $r3:0x00008080
18574 $r4:0x2008b0d4 $r5:0x2008b576 $r6:0x00000000 $r7:0x007a6b00
18575 $r8:0x7a6b0000 $r9:0x00008080 $r10:0x7f7f7f7f $r11:0x00000004
18576 $r12:0x00008080 $r13:0xdeadbeef $r14:0x00000001 $r15:0x2ff22b04
18577 $r16:0x2ff22b0c $r17:0x00000000 $r18:0xdeadbeef $r19:0xdeadbeef
18578 $r20:0xdeadbeef $r21:0xdeadbeef $r22:0xdeadbeef $r23:0xdeadbeef
18579 $r24:0xdeadbeef $r25:0x00000001 $r26:0x2ff22b04 $r27:0x00000001
18580 $r28:0x2008c488 $r29:0x00000001 $r30:0x2008c668 $r31:0x00008080
18581 $iar:0x1001d2b4 $msr:0x0002d0b2 $cr:0x24222224 $link:0x1001d2ac
18582 $ctr:0x00000004 $xer:0x0000000f $mq:0xdeadbeef
18583 Condition status = 0:e 1:g 2:e 3:e 4:e 5:e 6:e 7:g
18584 [unset $noflregs to view floating point registers]
18585 in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2b4
18586 0x1001d2b4 (load_one_serverstats+0x5c) 80610038 lwz r3,0x38(r1)
18587 (dbx) stepi
18588 stopped in load_one_serverstats at 0x1001d2b8
18589 0x1001d2b8 (load_one_serverstats+0x60) 4bfe7089 bl 0x10004340
18590 (free)
18591 (dbx)
18592 ====
18593
18594 I am wondering what the constant 64 means in:
18595 extsyms.c:
18596
18597 static void *__dblocal_##func##_stub(void) { \
18598 __dblocal_##func##_stub0(); \
18599 __builtin_return(__builtin_apply((void *)__dblocal_##func, \
18600 __builtin_apply_args(), 64)); \
18601 } \
18602
18603
18604
18605 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Jun 14 18:02:25 2004
18606 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
18607 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18608 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmentation Error at startup with database load
18609 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.0.20040614103223.027b1288@mail>
18610 Message-ID: <40cd6acf.73526@achurch.org>
18611
18612 This looks like the GCC __builtin_apply() bug I reported to the GCC
18613 team a while back (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8028). The
18614 configure script should detect and work around this, though; I'm not sure
18615 why not. I'll take a closer look at this report and see if I can figure
18616 the problem out.
18617
18618 >I am wondering what the constant 64 means in:
18619 >extsyms.c:
18620 >
18621 >static void *__dblocal_##func##_stub(void) { \
18622 > __dblocal_##func##_stub0(); \
18623 > __builtin_return(__builtin_apply((void *)__dblocal_##func, \
18624 > __builtin_apply_args(), 64)); \
18625 >} \
18626
18627 This is more suited to the -coding list, but 64 is the argument space
18628 reserved for the called function--I use 64 as an arbitrary value larger
18629 than anything that will actually be passed. See the GCC documentation for
18630 details on how __builtin_apply() works.
18631
18632 --Andrew Church
18633 achurch@achurch.org
18634 http://achurch.org/
18635
18636
18637 From mamfelt at acm.org Mon Jun 14 08:23:45 2004
18638 From: mamfelt at acm.org (Michael Felt)
18639 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18640 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmentation Error at startup with database
18641 load
18642 In-Reply-To: <40cd6acf.73526@achurch.org>
18643 References: <6.1.0.6.0.20040614103223.027b1288@mail>
18644 <40cd6acf.73526@achurch.org>
18645 Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.0.20040614171338.02774f18@mail>
18646
18647 Thanks for your answer.
18648
18649 As it has been about 15 or 16 years since I have done any serious assembly
18650 programming, and GNU is very new to me, I am a bit curious about why this
18651 particular solution is chosen.
18652
18653 What I usedto do years ago was define a struct, similiar to the way device
18654 drivers are/were added (maybe they do that differently today too) - in
18655 which one of the fields would be a pointer to a function. As I think of it,
18656 it is still pretty standard to include a pointer to a function to ioctl.
18657
18658 Would there be any interest in my looking a different way of doing this? Or
18659 will you prefer to do some inline assembly (ala SPARC)?
18660
18661 If interested I can send your cc "assembly" output to see what the compiler
18662 is turning it into. I havent made a real study of xlC and/or gcc assembly
18663 conventions. But I am certainly willing.
18664
18665 It is certainly frustrating to see everything there, but just not being
18666 returned properly.
18667
18668 At 11:02 AM 6/14/2004, you wrote:
18669 > This looks like the GCC __builtin_apply() bug I reported to the GCC
18670 >team a while back (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8028). The
18671 >configure script should detect and work around this, though; I'm not sure
18672 >why not. I'll take a closer look at this report and see if I can figure
18673 >the problem out.
18674 >
18675 > >I am wondering what the constant 64 means in:
18676 > >extsyms.c:
18677 > >
18678 > >static void *__dblocal_##func##_stub(void) { \
18679 > > __dblocal_##func##_stub0(); \
18680 > > __builtin_return(__builtin_apply((void *)__dblocal_##func, \
18681 > > __builtin_apply_args(), 64)); \
18682 > >} \
18683 >
18684 > This is more suited to the -coding list, but 64 is the argument space
18685 >reserved for the called function--I use 64 as an arbitrary value larger
18686 >than anything that will actually be passed. See the GCC documentation for
18687 >details on how __builtin_apply() works.
18688
18689 Thanks again. Should I be posting to the -coding list - rather than here?
18690
18691
18692 > --Andrew Church
18693 > achurch@achurch.org
18694 > http://achurch.org/
18695 >
18696 >------------------------------------------------------------------
18697 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
18698 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
18699
18700
18701
18702 From rsaikali at mchsi.com Wed Jun 16 16:12:36 2004
18703 From: rsaikali at mchsi.com (Rami Saikali)
18704 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18705 Subject: [IRCServices] bug
18706 Message-ID: <mailman.64.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
18707
18708 1. Running version ircservices-5.0.31 services.zirc.org build #2,
18709 compiled Thu May 20 23:20:13 EDT 2004
18710
18711 2. Unreal3.2.
18712
18713 3. Users who have access to the deprotect command can remove the mode +q
18714 from the channel founder. First add a user at sop access level. Then have
18715 the user type /msg chanserv deprotect <founder> replacing <founder> with the
18716 name of the founder. Logs:
18717
18718 [17:57:24] * ChanServ sets mode: -q Excelsior
18719
18720 [17:57:25] -ChanServ:#OA- DEPROTECT command used for excelsior by nikhsub1
18721
18722 [17:57:25] * You were kicked from #OA by ChanServ (KICK by nikhsub1)
18723
18724 Seems minor, and may not be a bug, but I don't think deprotect was intended
18725 to also remove +q'd users founder status, as it never did before.
18726
18727
18728
18729 -Excelsior
18730
18731 Bones.wa.us.zirc.org Co-Administrator
18732
18733 -------------- next part --------------
18734 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
18735 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040616/d492327a/attachment.html
18736 From meekhou at houston.rr.com Tue Jun 22 08:44:41 2004
18737 From: meekhou at houston.rr.com (Noah Meek)
18738 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18739 Subject: [IRCServices] (no subject)
18740 Message-ID: <134AD758-C463-11D8-BEFB-00039398BC3C@houston.rr.com>
18741
18742 Hey,
18743 I get the following error when I start ircservices
18744 [Jun 22 10:23:29.046383 2004] debug: Loading module `database/version4'
18745 [Jun 22 10:23:29.046479 2004] modules: Unable to load module
18746 `database/version4': No `module_version' symbol found
18747 [Jun 22 10:23:29.046560 2004] Error loading modules, aborting
18748
18749 I am running Bahamut 1.8.1 on Mac OS X 10.3.4 and im trying to start
18750 ircservices 4.5
18751
18752
18753
18754 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Tue Jun 22 09:15:00 2004
18755 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
18756 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18757 Subject: [IRCServices] (no subject)
18758 In-Reply-To: <134AD758-C463-11D8-BEFB-00039398BC3C@houston.rr.com>
18759 References: <134AD758-C463-11D8-BEFB-00039398BC3C@houston.rr.com>
18760 Message-ID: <1087920900.26568.1.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
18761
18762 IrcServices versions 4.x do not include module support.
18763 You must be using something else.
18764 Are you sure not using a modified services package?
18765 Please upgrade to the latest release, 5.0.32
18766
18767 Andy: Is ircservices capable of running on macosx?
18768
18769 Regards;
18770 yusuf
18771
18772 On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 17:44, Noah Meek wrote:
18773 > Hey,
18774 > I get the following error when I start ircservices
18775 > [Jun 22 10:23:29.046383 2004] debug: Loading module `database/version4'
18776 > [Jun 22 10:23:29.046479 2004] modules: Unable to load module
18777 > `database/version4': No `module_version' symbol found
18778 > [Jun 22 10:23:29.046560 2004] Error loading modules, aborting
18779 >
18780 > I am running Bahamut 1.8.1 on Mac OS X 10.3.4 and im trying to start
18781 > ircservices 4.5
18782 >
18783 >
18784 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
18785 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
18786 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
18787
18788
18789
18790 From meekhou at houston.rr.com Tue Jun 22 10:50:55 2004
18791 From: meekhou at houston.rr.com (Noah Meek)
18792 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18793 Subject: [IRCServices] help: starting up irc services
18794 Message-ID: <B60CCD04-C474-11D8-A26C-00039398BC3C@houston.rr.com>
18795
18796 Get the following error when I try to startup irc services (version
18797 5.0.32)
18798
18799 [Jun 22 11:18:00 2004] Error loading modules, aborting
18800 [Jun 22 12:48:55 2004] IRC Services 5.0.32 starting up
18801 [Jun 22 12:48:56 2004] modules: Unable to load module
18802 `database/version4': No `module_version' symbol found
18803 [Jun 22 12:48:56 2004] Error loading modules, aborting
18804
18805 I am using Bahamut 1.8.1 and it works fine. How do i get IRC Services
18806 to start??
18807
18808
18809
18810 From maciek at planet.nl Thu Jun 24 12:08:27 2004
18811 From: maciek at planet.nl (M. Sokolewicz)
18812 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18813 Subject: [IRCServices] Link denied
18814 Message-ID: <40DB26AB.8070709@planet.nl>
18815
18816 hi,
18817
18818 I hope I'm not asking at the wrong list with this problem, but here goes...
18819 I have installed UnrealIRCd 3.2, and it works fine. I've also installed
18820 IRCServices 5.
18821
18822 Now, whenever I start up both the service server and the IRC server (IRC
18823 server first of course), ircservices.log returns:
18824 [Jun 24 19:59:36 2004] unknown message from server (:server.example.com
18825 451 PING :You have not registered)
18826 [Jun 24 19:59:36 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
18827 (No matching link configuration) [@207.44.144.61.8097])
18828 [Jun 24 19:59:36 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing Link:
18829 [207.44.144.61] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
18830 [Jun 24 19:59:36 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
18831
18832 I checked the link block in unrealirc.conf, and it LOOKS right (to me),
18833 but I'll show it anyway
18834 link server.example.com {
18835 username *;
18836 hostname 207.44.144.61;
18837 port 8097;
18838 hub *;
18839 password-connect "nopass";
18840 password-receive "nopass";
18841 class servers;
18842
18843 options {
18844 nohostcheck;
18845 }
18846 };
18847
18848 vs. ircservices.conf:
18849 RemoteServer server.example.com 6667 "nopass"
18850 LocalAddress localhost 8097
18851 ServerName "server.example.com"
18852
18853 As you can see, both SEEM to be linkable (well, they do to me...),
18854 Now, the problem remains, I'm still getting the error in the log files,
18855 but I have no idea how to resolve this.
18856
18857 Ideas, please?
18858
18859 thank you,
18860 M. Sokolewicz
18861
18862
18863 From loliveira at neoline.com.br Thu Jun 24 12:29:37 2004
18864 From: loliveira at neoline.com.br (Luiz Oliveira)
18865 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18866 Subject: [IRCServices] Link denied
18867 In-Reply-To: <40DB26AB.8070709@planet.nl>
18868 References: <40DB26AB.8070709@planet.nl>
18869 Message-ID: <1088105377.23511.5.camel@PO205.al.neoline.com.br>
18870
18871 Em Qui, 2004-06-24 ?s 16:08, M. Sokolewicz escreveu:
18872 > hi,
18873 (...)
18874 >
18875 > vs. ircservices.conf:
18876 > RemoteServer server.example.com 6667 "nopass"
18877 > LocalAddress localhost 8097
18878 > ServerName "server.example.com"
18879
18880 Try:
18881
18882 RemoteServer server.example.com 8097 "nopass"
18883
18884 LocalAddress...
18885 Specifies the local address to bind to before connecting to the remote
18886 server. This may be useful on multihomed hosts.
18887
18888
18889 ~ Luiz
18890
18891
18892
18893
18894 From maciek at planet.nl Thu Jun 24 13:01:45 2004
18895 From: maciek at planet.nl (M. Sokolewicz)
18896 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18897 Subject: [IRCServices] Link denied
18898 In-Reply-To: <1088105377.23511.5.camel@PO205.al.neoline.com.br>
18899 References: <40DB26AB.8070709@planet.nl>
18900 <1088105377.23511.5.camel@PO205.al.neoline.com.br>
18901 Message-ID: <40DB3329.9030506@planet.nl>
18902
18903 hi,
18904
18905 It returns:
18906 [Jun 24 20:58:35 2004] IRC Services 5.0.32 starting up
18907 [Jun 24 20:58:36 2004] httpd/main: Listening on 127.0.0.1:12701
18908 [Jun 24 20:58:36 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(0): Connection refused
18909
18910 Besides, RemoteServer supplies the host, port and password for the IRC
18911 server you want to run this service on. So I don't think turning the
18912 host and port to the port and host the SERVICE is listening on would
18913 help at all. But that might be just me...
18914
18915 - M. Sokolewicz
18916
18917 Luiz Oliveira wrote:
18918
18919 >Em Qui, 2004-06-24 ?s 16:08, M. Sokolewicz escreveu:
18920 >
18921 >
18922 >>hi,
18923 >>
18924 >>
18925 >(...)
18926 >
18927 >
18928 >>vs. ircservices.conf:
18929 >>RemoteServer server.example.com 6667 "nopass"
18930 >>LocalAddress localhost 8097
18931 >>ServerName "server.example.com"
18932 >>
18933 >>
18934 >
18935 >Try:
18936 >
18937 >RemoteServer server.example.com 8097 "nopass"
18938 >
18939 >LocalAddress...
18940 >Specifies the local address to bind to before connecting to the remote
18941 >server. This may be useful on multihomed hosts.
18942 >
18943 >
18944 >~ Luiz
18945 >
18946 >
18947 >
18948 >------------------------------------------------------------------
18949 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
18950 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
18951 >
18952 >
18953 >
18954
18955
18956
18957
18958 From phan70m at gmail.com Thu Jun 24 13:20:13 2004
18959 From: phan70m at gmail.com (PHANTOm)
18960 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
18961 Subject: [IRCServices] Link denied
18962 In-Reply-To: <40DB3329.9030506@planet.nl>
18963 References: <40DB26AB.8070709@planet.nl>
18964 <1088105377.23511.5.camel@PO205.al.neoline.com.br>
18965 <40DB3329.9030506@planet.nl>
18966 Message-ID: <d50f59a0040624132053b48a88@mail.gmail.com>
18967
18968 Wierd problem you got there,
18969 consider commenting the LocalAddress in ircservices.conf, it's not
18970 really needed for services to connect or work.
18971 Also, i'd recomment connecting services to a seperate port on the
18972 ircd, preferably one you mark as server-only.
18973 It would also speed services starting up if you'd use an ip in the
18974 RemoteServer instead of a host, and if both are on the same machine
18975 127.0.0.1 would be highly preferable (unless it's on a dedic. server
18976 that doesn't support 127.0.0.1 afcourse).
18977 Consider nagging unreal coders at irc.unrealircd.com #unreal-support
18978 Also, double check your ircd actually has all the values you set in
18979 the conf by using /stats L and /stats C
18980
18981 On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:01:45 +0200, M. Sokolewicz <maciek@planet.nl> wrote:
18982 >
18983 > hi,
18984 >
18985 > It returns:
18986 > [Jun 24 20:58:35 2004] IRC Services 5.0.32 starting up
18987 > [Jun 24 20:58:36 2004] httpd/main: Listening on 127.0.0.1:12701
18988 > [Jun 24 20:58:36 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(0): Connection refused
18989 >
18990 > Besides, RemoteServer supplies the host, port and password for the IRC
18991 > server you want to run this service on. So I don't think turning the
18992 > host and port to the port and host the SERVICE is listening on would
18993 > help at all. But that might be just me...
18994 >
18995 > - M. Sokolewicz
18996 >
18997 >
18998 >
18999 > Luiz Oliveira wrote:
19000 >
19001 > >Em Qui, 2004-06-24 ?s 16:08, M. Sokolewicz escreveu:
19002 > >
19003 > >
19004 > >>hi,
19005 > >>
19006 > >>
19007 > >(...)
19008 > >
19009 > >
19010 > >>vs. ircservices.conf:
19011 > >>RemoteServer server.example.com 6667 "nopass"
19012 > >>LocalAddress localhost 8097
19013 > >>ServerName "server.example.com"
19014 > >>
19015 > >>
19016 > >
19017 > >Try:
19018 > >
19019 > >RemoteServer server.example.com 8097 "nopass"
19020 > >
19021 > >LocalAddress...
19022 > >Specifies the local address to bind to before connecting to the remote
19023 > >server. This may be useful on multihomed hosts.
19024 > >
19025 > >
19026 > >~ Luiz
19027 > >
19028 > >
19029 > >
19030 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
19031 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
19032 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
19033 > >
19034 > >
19035 > >
19036 >
19037 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
19038 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
19039 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
19040 >
19041
19042
19043 From maciek at planet.nl Thu Jun 24 14:17:59 2004
19044 From: maciek at planet.nl (M. Sokolewicz)
19045 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19046 Subject: [IRCServices] Link denied
19047 In-Reply-To: <d50f59a0040624132053b48a88@mail.gmail.com>
19048 References: <40DB26AB.8070709@planet.nl>
19049 <1088105377.23511.5.camel@PO205.al.neoline.com.br>
19050 <40DB3329.9030506@planet.nl>
19051 <d50f59a0040624132053b48a88@mail.gmail.com>
19052 Message-ID: <40DB4507.1010808@planet.nl>
19053
19054 I removed the LocalAddress, and changes everything to 127.0.0.1, also
19055 added special servers-only port, and for some strange reason it started
19056 spitting out errors, after correcting those (including the "missing
19057 bind-ip", etc), it all works fine now.
19058
19059 Thank you for your help!
19060 - M. Sokolewicz
19061
19062 PHANTOm wrote:
19063
19064 >Wierd problem you got there,
19065 >consider commenting the LocalAddress in ircservices.conf, it's not
19066 >really needed for services to connect or work.
19067 >Also, i'd recomment connecting services to a seperate port on the
19068 >ircd, preferably one you mark as server-only.
19069 >It would also speed services starting up if you'd use an ip in the
19070 >RemoteServer instead of a host, and if both are on the same machine
19071 >127.0.0.1 would be highly preferable (unless it's on a dedic. server
19072 >that doesn't support 127.0.0.1 afcourse).
19073 >Consider nagging unreal coders at irc.unrealircd.com #unreal-support
19074 >Also, double check your ircd actually has all the values you set in
19075 >the conf by using /stats L and /stats C
19076 >
19077 >On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:01:45 +0200, M. Sokolewicz <maciek@planet.nl> wrote:
19078 >
19079 >
19080 >>hi,
19081 >>
19082 >>It returns:
19083 >>[Jun 24 20:58:35 2004] IRC Services 5.0.32 starting up
19084 >>[Jun 24 20:58:36 2004] httpd/main: Listening on 127.0.0.1:12701
19085 >>[Jun 24 20:58:36 2004] sockets: flush_write_buffer(0): Connection refused
19086 >>
19087 >>Besides, RemoteServer supplies the host, port and password for the IRC
19088 >>server you want to run this service on. So I don't think turning the
19089 >>host and port to the port and host the SERVICE is listening on would
19090 >>help at all. But that might be just me...
19091 >>
19092 >>- M. Sokolewicz
19093 >>
19094 >>
19095 >>
19096 >>Luiz Oliveira wrote:
19097 >>
19098 >>
19099 >>
19100 >>>Em Qui, 2004-06-24 ?s 16:08, M. Sokolewicz escreveu:
19101 >>>
19102 >>>
19103 >>>
19104 >>>
19105 >>>>hi,
19106 >>>>
19107 >>>>
19108 >>>>
19109 >>>>
19110 >>>(...)
19111 >>>
19112 >>>
19113 >>>
19114 >>>
19115 >>>>vs. ircservices.conf:
19116 >>>>RemoteServer server.example.com 6667 "nopass"
19117 >>>>LocalAddress localhost 8097
19118 >>>>ServerName "server.example.com"
19119 >>>>
19120 >>>>
19121 >>>>
19122 >>>>
19123 >>>Try:
19124 >>>
19125 >>>RemoteServer server.example.com 8097 "nopass"
19126 >>>
19127 >>>LocalAddress...
19128 >>>Specifies the local address to bind to before connecting to the remote
19129 >>>server. This may be useful on multihomed hosts.
19130 >>>
19131 >>>
19132 >>>~ Luiz
19133 >>>
19134 >>>
19135 >>>
19136
19137
19138
19139 From meekhou at houston.rr.com Fri Jun 25 17:56:11 2004
19140 From: meekhou at houston.rr.com (Noah Meek)
19141 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19142 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
19143 Message-ID: <9E29D283-C70B-11D8-AA22-00039398BC3C@houston.rr.com>
19144
19145 I have gotten IRC Services to compile on my Mac running 10.3.4. It
19146 doesn't complete the startup process yet (I've already fixed one
19147 problem shown in the log) but it compiled without any difficulty.
19148
19149
19150
19151 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jun 29 17:41:41 2004
19152 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19153 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19154 Subject: [IRCServices] bug
19155 In-Reply-To: <40d0d3ce.72425@mail.achurch.org>
19156 Message-ID: <40e12bdc.31042@achurch.org>
19157
19158 >3. Users who have access to the deprotect command can remove the mode +q
19159 >from the channel founder.
19160
19161 This is intended behavior, introduced in 5.0.30 (see the change log).
19162 Since DEPROTECT is (by default) limited to auto-protect users, who
19163 presumably are trusted, I don't consider this a problem.
19164
19165 --Andrew Church
19166 achurch@achurch.org
19167 http://achurch.org/
19168
19169
19170 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jun 30 11:56:37 2004
19171 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19172 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19173 Subject: [IRCServices] Compiling on OS X
19174 In-Reply-To: <9E29D283-C70B-11D8-AA22-00039398BC3C@houston.rr.com>
19175 Message-ID: <40e22bfb.74223@achurch.org>
19176
19177 >I have gotten IRC Services to compile on my Mac running 10.3.4. It
19178 >doesn't complete the startup process yet (I've already fixed one
19179 >problem shown in the log) but it compiled without any difficulty.
19180
19181 Thanks for the information; I've added it to the manual.
19182
19183 --Andrew Church
19184 achurch@achurch.org
19185 http://achurch.org/
19186
19187
19188 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 1 21:32:38 2004
19189 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19190 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19191 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.33 released
19192 Message-ID: <40e406c2.04350@achurch.org>
19193
19194 Services 5.0.33 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
19195
19196 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
19197
19198 b4b78d91f66dbec30dc05b952ea10de9 ircservices-5.0.33.tar.gz
19199 9ee92777f61a0770dd5e298e558a5137 ircservices-5.0.33.diff.gz
19200 1eb386c11414c43633b5a57fcbd41e07 ircservices-5.0.33-1.i386.rpm
19201 6b3c4287ec400ad9477044c1a2f56467 ircservices_5.0.33-1_i386.deb
19202
19203 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
19204
19205 This is a maintenance release that addresses minor issues mentioned
19206 recently (or perhaps not-so-recently) on the mailing lists. In particular,
19207 the "configure" script should now be more intelligent about detecting
19208 compilers which cannot compile Services correctly; GCC 3.4.0 seems to have
19209 all relevant bugs fixed, so if configure complains, try upgrading your GCC.
19210 If you patch to 5.0.33 from a previous version, you will need to re-run
19211 configure before recompiling.
19212
19213 Changes in version 5.0.33
19214 -------------------------
19215 2004/06/29 Fixed child process handling bug in mail/sendmail module.
19216 Reported by Ali Sor <alisor@softhome.net>
19217 2004/06/29 ChanServ STATUS now displays the SOP/AOP/VOP level when the
19218 chanserv/access-xop module is loaded. Suggested by
19219 Kieron Thwaites <ron2k@webmail.co.za>
19220 2004/06/29 For Bahamut, SGLINE/SQLINE commands for masks not in the
19221 appropriate list are now reversed by Services (to
19222 prevent "revival" of deleted masks by split servers).
19223 This applies to operator-issued SGLINE/SQLINEs as well.
19224 2004/06/17 The configure script now checks for two bugs in GCC (fixed
19225 in GCC 3.4.0) which cause Services to crash.
19226
19227 --Andrew Church
19228 achurch@achurch.org
19229 http://achurch.org/
19230
19231
19232 From martinpels at hotmail.com Fri Jul 2 03:49:59 2004
19233 From: martinpels at hotmail.com (Martin Pels)
19234 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19235 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19236 Message-ID: <BAY8-F31lUQ9cAgjHXw0006ad3a@hotmail.com>
19237
19238 Hi,
19239
19240 It looks like the httpd/auth-password module no longer works (it worked
19241 last time I used it, which was a couple of versions back).
19242
19243 I'm using version 5.0.33 and have the following in my modules.conf:
19244
19245 Module httpd/auth-password
19246 AuthName "Mp3CreW IRC Services"
19247 Protect / "test:test"
19248 EndModule
19249
19250 When i connect to services through http it gives me the user+pass
19251 screen, but it won't accept the user+pass i put in modules.conf.
19252
19253 I tried starting services in debugmode but didn't get more info than the
19254 connection message, so it looks like it doesn't process the user+pass at
19255 all (when I enable auth-ip I get a message when it denies access).
19256
19257 Grtz,
19258 Rodecker
19259
19260 _________________________________________________________________
19261 MSN Search, for accurate results! http://search.msn.nl
19262
19263
19264
19265 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Fri Jul 2 06:18:08 2004
19266 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
19267 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19268 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19269 References: <BAY8-F31lUQ9cAgjHXw0006ad3a@hotmail.com>
19270 Message-ID: <002701c46037$044f7340$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
19271
19272 I have to agree with Martin as I am unable to get into mine as well. It
19273 will not accept the login/password that I have assigned to it.
19274
19275 ----- Original Message -----
19276 From: "Martin Pels" <martinpels@hotmail.com>
19277 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
19278 Cc: <admins@mp3crew.nl>
19279 Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 6:49 AM
19280 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19281
19282
19283 > Hi,
19284 >
19285 > It looks like the httpd/auth-password module no longer works (it worked
19286 > last time I used it, which was a couple of versions back).
19287 >
19288 > I'm using version 5.0.33 and have the following in my modules.conf:
19289 >
19290 > Module httpd/auth-password
19291 > AuthName "Mp3CreW IRC Services"
19292 > Protect / "test:test"
19293 > EndModule
19294 >
19295 > When i connect to services through http it gives me the user+pass
19296 > screen, but it won't accept the user+pass i put in modules.conf.
19297 >
19298 > I tried starting services in debugmode but didn't get more info than the
19299 > connection message, so it looks like it doesn't process the user+pass at
19300 > all (when I enable auth-ip I get a message when it denies access).
19301 >
19302 > Grtz,
19303 > Rodecker
19304 >
19305 > _________________________________________________________________
19306 > MSN Search, for accurate results! http://search.msn.nl
19307 >
19308 >
19309 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
19310 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
19311 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
19312 >
19313
19314
19315
19316
19317 From medice at gmx.at Fri Jul 2 09:39:38 2004
19318 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
19319 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19320 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19321 In-Reply-To: <BAY8-F31lUQ9cAgjHXw0006ad3a@hotmail.com>
19322 References: <BAY8-F31lUQ9cAgjHXw0006ad3a@hotmail.com>
19323 Message-ID: <40E58FCA.7020304@gmx.at>
19324
19325 >
19326 > Module httpd/auth-password
19327 > AuthName "Mp3CreW IRC Services"
19328 > Protect / "test:test"
19329 > EndModule
19330 >
19331
19332 try "/~" instead of "/" since this as an example in the default-confs...
19333
19334 hth
19335
19336 /medice
19337
19338
19339
19340 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Fri Jul 2 12:21:36 2004
19341 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
19342 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19343 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19344 References: <BAY8-F31lUQ9cAgjHXw0006ad3a@hotmail.com> <40E58FCA.7020304@gmx.at>
19345 Message-ID: <001c01c46069$cb0c9ad0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
19346
19347 By using:
19348
19349 Protect /~ "nickuser:nickpass"
19350
19351 but does not password protect it at all. When it was:
19352
19353 Protect / "nickuser:nickpass"
19354
19355 it would work and protect it in the last version.
19356
19357 ----- Original Message -----
19358 From: "Medice" <medice@gmx.at>
19359 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
19360 Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 12:39 PM
19361 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19362
19363
19364 > >
19365 > > Module httpd/auth-password
19366 > > AuthName "Mp3CreW IRC Services"
19367 > > Protect / "test:test"
19368 > > EndModule
19369 > >
19370 >
19371 > try "/~" instead of "/" since this as an example in the default-confs...
19372 >
19373 > hth
19374 >
19375 > /medice
19376 >
19377 >
19378 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
19379 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
19380 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
19381 >
19382
19383
19384
19385 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon Jul 5 05:04:42 2004
19386 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
19387 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19388 Subject: [IRCServices] Wrong GCC Version?
19389 Message-ID: <mailman.65.1098597729.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
19390
19391 Hi, i was just compiling .33 of IRC Services, and it reported that i was using Version 2 of GCC...
19392
19393 Take a look :)
19394
19395 Searching for a suitable compiler...
19396 WARNING: Your version of GCC was detected as `2'. As of Services
19397 5.0.23, versions of GCC earlier than 3.2, other than 2.95.3,
19398 have been deprecated. This and future releases of Services 5.0
19399 will still work, though some error messages will lose
19400 information; future versions of Services may not compile at
19401 all. Please upgrade your compiler to GCC 3.2 or later.
19402
19403 Press Enter to continue:
19404 chatspike@azbox:~/services/ircservices-5.0.0$ gcc -v
19405 Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.4/specs
19406 Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i486-linux
19407 Thread model: posix
19408 gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-2)
19409
19410
19411 Obviously i know thats not an issue, because i AM using GCC3, Just wanted to inform you of the missreporting :)
19412
19413 /****************************************
19414 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
19415 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
19416 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
19417 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
19418 ****************************************/
19419
19420
19421
19422
19423 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Jul 5 23:45:41 2004
19424 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19425 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19426 Subject: [IRCServices] Wrong GCC Version?
19427 In-Reply-To: <40e94585.43160@mail.achurch.org>
19428 Message-ID: <40e96b10.02606@achurch.org>
19429
19430 Argh. The Debian people would find it enjoyable to screw with the
19431 version number, wouldn't they. Fixed, thanks for the report.
19432
19433 --Andrew Church
19434 achurch@achurch.org
19435 http://achurch.org/
19436
19437 >Hi, i was just compiling .33 of IRC Services, and it reported that i was using Version 2 of GCC...
19438 >
19439 >Take a look :)
19440 >
19441 >Searching for a suitable compiler...
19442 >WARNING: Your version of GCC was detected as `2'. As of Services
19443 > 5.0.23, versions of GCC earlier than 3.2, other than 2.95.3,
19444 > have been deprecated. This and future releases of Services 5.0
19445 > will still work, though some error messages will lose
19446 > information; future versions of Services may not compile at
19447 > all. Please upgrade your compiler to GCC 3.2 or later.
19448 >
19449 >Press Enter to continue:
19450 >chatspike@azbox:~/services/ircservices-5.0.0$ gcc -v
19451 >Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.4/specs
19452 >Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --w
19453 >ithout-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i486-linux
19454 >Thread model: posix
19455 >gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-2)
19456 >
19457 >
19458 >Obviously i know thats not an issue, because i AM using GCC3, Just wanted to inform you of the missreporting :)
19459 >
19460 >/****************************************
19461 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
19462 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
19463 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
19464 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
19465 > ****************************************/
19466 >
19467 >
19468 >
19469 >------------------------------------------------------------------
19470 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
19471
19472
19473 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Jul 5 23:53:47 2004
19474 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19475 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19476 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.34 released
19477 Message-ID: <40e96d6f.21263@achurch.org>
19478
19479 Services 5.0.34 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
19480
19481 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
19482
19483 38c1e12c6c255d0beca835a3217d8e4f ircservices-5.0.34.tar.gz
19484 05a203e419ea4401333f468a8356c8eb ircservices-5.0.34.diff.gz
19485 5f3ab5ae0e8754296729aaef3d844545 ircservices-5.0.34-1.i386.rpm
19486 6de0362b2fb0f2ed67ecee6d05e37f75 ircservices_5.0.34-1_i386.deb
19487
19488 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
19489
19490 This is a just minor update, correcting the GCC detection problem in
19491 Debian and fixing a couple of mode-lock-related bugs.
19492
19493 Changes in version 5.0.34
19494 -------------------------
19495 2004/07/05 configure now properly detects the GCC version in use when
19496 running under Debian Linux.
19497 2004/07/02 Fixed bugs in handling MLOCK +/-j on Bahamut.
19498 2004/07/02 Fixed tiny potential memory leak on failed SET MLOCK.
19499
19500 --Andrew Church
19501 achurch@achurch.org
19502 http://achurch.org/
19503
19504
19505 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jul 6 00:02:15 2004
19506 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19507 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19508 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19509 In-Reply-To: <BAY8-F31lUQ9cAgjHXw0006ad3a@hotmail.com>
19510 Message-ID: <40e96d8d.21271@achurch.org>
19511
19512 Oops, I forgot about this. I'll get to it next time...
19513
19514 --Andrew Church
19515 achurch@achurch.org
19516 http://achurch.org/
19517
19518 >Hi,
19519 >
19520 >It looks like the httpd/auth-password module no longer works (it worked
19521 >last time I used it, which was a couple of versions back).
19522 >
19523 >I'm using version 5.0.33 and have the following in my modules.conf:
19524 >
19525 >Module httpd/auth-password
19526 > AuthName "Mp3CreW IRC Services"
19527 > Protect / "test:test"
19528 >EndModule
19529 >
19530 >When i connect to services through http it gives me the user+pass
19531 >screen, but it won't accept the user+pass i put in modules.conf.
19532 >
19533 >I tried starting services in debugmode but didn't get more info than the
19534 >connection message, so it looks like it doesn't process the user+pass at
19535 >all (when I enable auth-ip I get a message when it denies access).
19536 >
19537 >Grtz,
19538 >Rodecker
19539 >
19540 >_________________________________________________________________
19541 >MSN Search, for accurate results! http://search.msn.nl
19542 >
19543 >
19544 >------------------------------------------------------------------
19545 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
19546 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
19547
19548
19549 From azoff at se.linux.org Mon Jul 5 08:49:52 2004
19550 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
19551 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19552 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19553 In-Reply-To: <40e96d8d.21271@achurch.org>
19554 References: <40e96d8d.21271@achurch.org>
19555 Message-ID: <40E978A0.5090501@se.linux.org>
19556
19557 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
19558 Hash: SHA1
19559
19560 Andrew Church wrote:
19561 | Oops, I forgot about this. I'll get to it next time...
19562
19563 Do you have any patch that one could apply so this works with 5.0.34?
19564
19565 Cheers!
19566 - --
19567 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
19568 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
19569 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
19570 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
19571
19572 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19573 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
19574 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
19575
19576 iD8DBQFA6XigeY7jmtvbDP0RAsqKAJ4nSbdwZanK6XKzvmgYddJLHkDepACdE1N3
19577 SJx5BjtlBaHOcEE2DKc+xoE=
19578 =XNnI
19579 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
19580
19581
19582 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jul 6 10:03:40 2004
19583 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19584 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19585 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19586 In-Reply-To: <40E978A0.5090501@se.linux.org>
19587 Message-ID: <40e9fa93.21574@achurch.org>
19588
19589 >| Oops, I forgot about this. I'll get to it next time...
19590 >
19591 >Do you have any patch that one could apply so this works with 5.0.34?
19592
19593 Nope--the reason it's not in 5.0.34 is because I didn't get around to
19594 fixing the problem. ;) I'll release .35 when it's fixed.
19595
19596 --Andrew Church
19597 achurch@achurch.org
19598 http://achurch.org/
19599
19600
19601 From azoff at se.linux.org Mon Jul 5 21:12:35 2004
19602 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
19603 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19604 Subject: [IRCServices] httpd/auth-password seems broken
19605 In-Reply-To: <40e9fa93.21574@achurch.org>
19606 References: <40e9fa93.21574@achurch.org>
19607 Message-ID: <40EA26B3.6040909@se.linux.org>
19608
19609 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
19610 Hash: SHA1
19611
19612 Andrew Church wrote:
19613 | Nope--the reason it's not in 5.0.34 is because I didn't get around to
19614 | fixing the problem. ;) I'll release .35 when it's fixed.
19615
19616 Oki, thanks!
19617
19618 Cheers!
19619 - --
19620 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
19621 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
19622 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org
19623 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
19624
19625 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19626 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
19627 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
19628
19629 iD8DBQFA6iaweY7jmtvbDP0RAvwgAKDPEpC3/hr3gxOObrZm9fHNcFbqawCfQtil
19630 xjZwhWhyvpwjLPA7zMqcQkM=
19631 =g0t7
19632 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
19633
19634
19635 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Jul 7 10:42:55 2004
19636 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
19637 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19638 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ SecureoOps Feature
19639 Message-ID: <20040707174255.34991.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
19640
19641 I was thinking about a ChanServ feature like secureops
19642 but with a difference. This will allow ONLY registered
19643 nicknames to gain op or halfop mode.
19644
19645 Any Comments?
19646
19647
19648 =====
19649 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
19650
19651
19652 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 8 09:50:55 2004
19653 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19654 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19655 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ SecureoOps Feature
19656 In-Reply-To: <20040707174255.34991.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
19657 Message-ID: <40ec9a9f.61074@achurch.org>
19658
19659 >I was thinking about a ChanServ feature like secureops
19660 >but with a difference. This will allow ONLY registered
19661 >nicknames to gain op or halfop mode.
19662
19663 I can't see any use for this. If you're that concerned about
19664 unregistered users misbehaving in your channel, just set a +R modelock and
19665 keep them out.
19666
19667 --Andrew Church
19668 achurch@achurch.org
19669 http://achurch.org/
19670
19671
19672 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 8 22:05:16 2004
19673 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19674 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19675 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.35 released
19676 Message-ID: <40ed4706.10624@achurch.org>
19677
19678 Services 5.0.35 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
19679
19680 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
19681
19682 92c7074ac4788f0e0f5b05f80be1fada ircservices-5.0.35.tar.gz
19683 2c9a4284bd7a190c5ec531a1272935a5 ircservices-5.0.35.diff.gz
19684 5a286712d036e549a81b527a4e051af0 ircservices-5.0.35-1.i386.rpm
19685 634f59b5448d79b4f6a5e4d1b010134d ircservices_5.0.35-1_i386.deb
19686
19687 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
19688
19689 This release is primarily to fix the HTTP authorization bug reported
19690 recently (a stupid mistake on my part--read the diff file for the gory
19691 details). Apologies for the multiple updates in such a short period of
19692 time.
19693
19694 Changes in version 5.0.35
19695 -------------------------
19696 2004/07/08 Fixed memory leak in httpd/auth-password module when
19697 reconfiguring.
19698 2004/07/08 Fixed bug causing HTTP password authorization to fail.
19699 Reported by Martin Pels <martinpels@hotmail.com>
19700 2004/07/07 Added support for invite masks to Hybrid protocol.
19701 Suggested by Jon Christopherson <jon@jons.org>
19702
19703 --Andrew Church
19704 achurch@achurch.org
19705 http://achurch.org/
19706
19707
19708 From chawmp at cyberarmy.net Thu Jul 8 12:50:51 2004
19709 From: chawmp at cyberarmy.net (Chawmp)
19710 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19711 Subject: [IRCServices] Seg Fault/Bus Error on SQUIT
19712 Message-ID: <20040708194930.CMKR8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
19713
19714 Hello,
19715
19716 Recently, after moving our ircservices to a new host, they have crashed with
19717 a Bus Error whenever another server quit.
19718
19719 I've searched and found that a few others have posted with this problem, but
19720 didn't find a resolution. So I had to debug :\
19721
19722 We actually use a non-current, modded version for long and boring reasons,
19723 but I have checked and all this applies equally to stock ircservices 5.0.35:
19724
19725 do_squit() in servers.c contains the following code:
19726
19727 squit_server(server, av[1]);
19728 if (server->hub) {
19729 .. attempts to read server->hub ..
19730 }
19731
19732 squit_server() in turn calls delete_server, that free()s the server record,
19733 meaning "server->hub" attempts to dereference a freed pointer.
19734
19735 On most systems this would probably just work anyway, since there would have
19736 been no time for the freed memory to have been changed before it was
19737 accessed again for the last time. However, on the server we were using,
19738 malloc was configured to initialize memory to 0xd0d0d0d0 when it was
19739 free()d, leading to a Bus Error at the dereference.
19740
19741 I fixed this by moving the squit_server(...) call after the "if
19742 (server->hub)" block, and things seem to work.
19743
19744 I hope this fix is correct, and works for everyone else.
19745
19746 Regards,
19747
19748 Tom McIntyre
19749 chawmp@cyberarmy.net
19750
19751
19752
19753
19754 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jul 9 18:29:09 2004
19755 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19756 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19757 Subject: [IRCServices] Seg Fault/Bus Error on SQUIT
19758 In-Reply-To: <20040708194930.CMKR8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
19759 Message-ID: <40ee6580.13535@achurch.org>
19760
19761 >Recently, after moving our ircservices to a new host, they have crashed with
19762 >a Bus Error whenever another server quit.
19763
19764 Fixed, thanks for the report.
19765
19766 --Andrew Church
19767 achurch@achurch.org
19768 http://achurch.org/
19769
19770
19771 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri Jul 9 14:43:58 2004
19772 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
19773 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19774 Subject: [IRCServices] Hide Services Clients
19775 Message-ID: <20040709214358.42732.qmail@web53106.mail.yahoo.com>
19776
19777 I think it will be nice if Services Clients had the +H
19778 mode on Unreal
19779 (Or just remove +o mode from clients because Services
19780 is a U:lined server anyway)
19781 Because services clients are not irc operators and
19782 should not be counted as opers on /lusers and on /who
19783 0 o and on /stats +m o
19784
19785
19786 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Jul 12 18:16:05 2004
19787 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19788 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:09 2004
19789 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.36 released
19790 Message-ID: <40f257c6.32373@achurch.org>
19791
19792 Services 5.0.36 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
19793
19794 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
19795
19796 80759b531fa5d0345a11f237228de98c ircservices-5.0.36.tar.gz
19797 904a29dc5849c557e84fb11df8946803 ircservices-5.0.36.diff.gz
19798 2b1814a7b351a11e163041b7b7fdb568 ircservices-5.0.36-1.i386.rpm
19799 16623e0a026b1742c33caad835c521ca ircservices_5.0.36-1_i386.deb
19800
19801 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
19802
19803 This release corrects the crash on SQUIT reported a few days ago; if
19804 aren't experiencing this problem, you don't need to upgrade immediately.
19805 (Due to the memory layout of the relevant data, this problem only occurs
19806 under certain environments--if you can SQUIT a server once without Services
19807 crashing, you're probably safe.)
19808
19809 I've also removed the "sockets BUG" message that has from time to
19810 time filled up people's log files. I still haven't been able to pinpoint
19811 the problem itself, but I'll be switching to a revised version of the
19812 socket handling code for Services 5.1 (which, coincidentally, I've finally
19813 started working on), so this will hopefully suffice as a workaround for the
19814 meantime.
19815
19816 Changes in version 5.0.36
19817 -------------------------
19818 2004/07/09 Removed log message on socket buffer size misbehavior.
19819 2004/07/09 Fixed potential crash on SQUIT. Reported by Tom McIntyre
19820 <chawmp@cyberarmy.net>
19821
19822 --Andrew Church
19823 achurch@achurch.org
19824 http://achurch.org/
19825
19826
19827 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue Jul 13 14:18:49 2004
19828 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (=?iso-8859-7?q?Dionisios=20K.?=)
19829 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
19830 Subject: [IRCServices] Ircservices + Unreal3.2.1
19831 Message-ID: <20040713211849.67559.qmail@web53106.mail.yahoo.com>
19832
19833 Hello :)))
19834
19835 I have 2 questions:
19836
19837 1) From Unreal3.2.1 IP addresses is sent to all
19838 servers on connection. Is this supported from services
19839 so they can remove IP bans or not yet?
19840
19841 2) Can i use ircservices 4.5.45 with unreal 3.2.1 ?
19842
19843
19844
19845 From lordbergee at comcast.net Tue Jul 13 16:32:11 2004
19846 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
19847 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
19848 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ enforcer bug when unlinking nicknames
19849 Message-ID: <40F470FB.7070104@comcast.net>
19850
19851 I recently experienced a minor bug on my network which is currently
19852 running IRCServices 5.0.31 on Red Hat Linux 9.0 on an Intel Celeron 1.7
19853 GHz processor.
19854 A while ago I noticed that a NickServ Enforcer bot had been sitting on
19855 a nickname for over an hour. Checking NickServ INFO returned that the
19856 nickname was not registered. After a little investigating in the log
19857 files I noticed that the nickname had very recently been unlinked by its
19858 owner. With that in hand I've been able to consistently reproduce the
19859 problem by taking the following steps: (This assumes of course that
19860 your network does not have NSForceNickChange enabled.)
19861 1) Register a nickname and enable automatic kill protection and then
19862 link another nickname to your name.
19863 2) Have another user use the nickname you just linked and wait for
19864 NickServ to kill the user.
19865 3) Unlink the other nickname from your main nickname and watch as the
19866 NickServ enforcer bot doesn't ever release the nickname. If you attempt
19867 to use NickServ release you will be told the nickname isn't being held.
19868 Before reporting the problem, I upgraded to IRCServices 5.0.36 and it
19869 is still reproducible. I believe that Services should simply remove the
19870 enforcer bot holding a nickname if the user unlinks the nickname while
19871 the enforcer is online.
19872
19873 Bergee
19874
19875
19876 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 14 08:52:11 2004
19877 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19878 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
19879 Subject: [IRCServices] Ircservices + Unreal3.2.1
19880 In-Reply-To: <20040713211849.67559.qmail@web53106.mail.yahoo.com>
19881 Message-ID: <40f475ba.66610@achurch.org>
19882
19883 >Hello :)))
19884 >
19885 >I have 2 questions:
19886 >
19887 >1) From Unreal3.2.1 IP addresses is sent to all
19888 >servers on connection. Is this supported from services
19889 >so they can remove IP bans or not yet?
19890 >
19891 >2) Can i use ircservices 4.5.45 with unreal 3.2.1 ?
19892
19893 Yes to both, as documented in the change log.
19894
19895 --Andrew Church
19896 achurch@achurch.org
19897 http://achurch.org/
19898
19899
19900 From chris at starglade.org Tue Jul 13 16:56:14 2004
19901 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
19902 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
19903 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
19904 Message-ID: <40F4769E.7020107@starglade.org>
19905
19906 Hiya,
19907
19908 I'm just curious what kind of new stuff we should be expecting in IRC
19909 Services 5.1. Have you got a plan for what you'd like to add or is it
19910 going to be what people suggest?
19911
19912 Chris
19913 --
19914 Chris Jenkinson
19915 chris@starglade.org
19916
19917
19918 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 14 10:42:43 2004
19919 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19920 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
19921 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ enforcer bug when unlinking nicknames
19922 In-Reply-To: <40F470FB.7070104@comcast.net>
19923 Message-ID: <40f48ffb.70156@achurch.org>
19924
19925 > 1) Register a nickname and enable automatic kill protection and then
19926 >link another nickname to your name.
19927 > 2) Have another user use the nickname you just linked and wait for
19928 >NickServ to kill the user.
19929 > 3) Unlink the other nickname from your main nickname and watch as the
19930 >NickServ enforcer bot doesn't ever release the nickname. If you attempt
19931 >to use NickServ release you will be told the nickname isn't being held.
19932
19933 Fixed, thanks for the report. For the meantime, just /kill any
19934 enforcers you find sitting around too long.
19935
19936 --Andrew Church
19937 achurch@achurch.org
19938 http://achurch.org/
19939
19940
19941 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 14 10:46:08 2004
19942 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
19943 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
19944 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
19945 In-Reply-To: <40F4769E.7020107@starglade.org>
19946 Message-ID: <40f4923b.70175@achurch.org>
19947
19948 >I'm just curious what kind of new stuff we should be expecting in IRC
19949 >Services 5.1. Have you got a plan for what you'd like to add or is it
19950 >going to be what people suggest?
19951
19952 I'm always open to suggestions, but here are some of the things I'm
19953 thinking about:
19954
19955 - At least some progress toward support for MySQL/etc. databases
19956 - A wider variety of statistics from StatServ
19957 - More flexible logging (e.g. separate "main" log and "event" log)
19958 - Some way to simplify the configuration process (a configuration module
19959 for the HTTP interface, for example)
19960
19961 And before anyone asks (because I know someone will...), no, I won't
19962 add a BotServ.
19963
19964 --Andrew Church
19965 achurch@achurch.org
19966 http://achurch.org/
19967
19968
19969 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Tue Jul 13 19:29:46 2004
19970 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
19971 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
19972 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
19973 Message-ID: <mailman.66.1098597730.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
19974
19975 Ok, this is going to be a mail where i comment on the original message..
19976
19977 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
19978
19979 > I'm always open to suggestions, but here are some of the things I'm
19980 >thinking about:
19981 Careful of thinking.. its bad for you lol (j/k)
19982
19983 >- At least some progress toward support for MySQL/etc. databases
19984 I'm still not entirely convinced that MySQL is needed.. i'm working on an interface that allows the current version of Services to communicate with a web inteface using sockets.. and if you DO add MySQL, i think it should be a feature which is 'all or nothing', having "some progress" wouldnt really be useful.. (currently, i understand that MySQL isnt possible due to the way that services stores all its information in structs, rather than directly accessing the database) but unless there is full dynamic read / write, it probably wouldnt be used (this will bring me onto another point later).
19985
19986 >- A wider variety of statistics from StatServ
19987 irc.chatspike.net uses a modified version of Statserv at the moment, which will do periodic dumps to a SQL file (which can be imported) although you said you would take a look at its feature set when it was first completed, i dont think you got around to it.
19988
19989 >- More flexible logging (e.g. separate "main" log and "event" log)
19990 >- Some way to simplify the configuration process (a configuration module
19991 > for the HTTP interface, for example)
19992 >
19993 > And before anyone asks (because I know someone will...), no, I won't
19994 >add a BotServ.
19995 Thank god.
19996 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
19997
19998 ok, now for a couple of suggestions of my own..
19999 a "Standardised" database format, which would allow modules to create and maintain databases in the same way as services would (so the database module would be totally independant from other modules). Having to code a database from scratch for services can be frustrating.
20000
20001 a way for modules which add commands to say.. Nickserv to dynamicly add items to help files without the need to edit the .lang files. I find it frustrating sometimes when i release modules that add functionality to nickserv that they cant be viewed in /ns help without editing the language file. so for example, addhelp(<SECTION>, <LANGUAGE>, <STRING>); if section already exists, append it to the end (for example /ns help commands, or a totally seperate item which can be added to the command struct). Maybe if this is done, the entire of services hlp can be dynamically generated, so it wont list commands that arn't avaliable.
20002
20003 possibly add sendpass commands for encrypted passwords? ;)
20004
20005 maybe a second mode for memoserv, currently, you have either forward on or off, i'd like to have a 'Notify' command, which will send me a memo just saying "You have a new memo" and possibly the command for reading it, but leaving it in the database.
20006
20007 PLEASE NOTE: before flaming me, this is my 2c when it comes to 5.1, i'm not saying any of these features 'must be in there'. Andy has done a lot of hard work on services, and i appreciate this. When it comes to the services frontend, i think all that can be crammed into it (bar 1 or 2 small features) has been. my suggestions were made in a hope that when it comes to module development, life can become much easier, encouraging more people to create their own modules. i concider myself to be 'active' on the module scene, and find some parts of creating modules frustrating :)
20008
20009 Thanks for your time.
20010
20011 /****************************************
20012 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
20013 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
20014 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
20015 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
20016 ****************************************/
20017
20018
20019
20020
20021
20022 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 14 12:31:14 2004
20023 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20024 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20025 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20026 In-Reply-To: <40f49af2.71643@mail.achurch.org>
20027 Message-ID: <40f4ab62.70244@achurch.org>
20028
20029 >ok, now for a couple of suggestions of my own..
20030 >a "Standardised" database format, which would allow modules to create and maintain databases in the same way as services would (so the database module would be totally independant from other modules). Having to code a database from scratch for services ca
20031 >n be frustrating.
20032
20033 This is what my "some progress" is aiming for. I've been aware of
20034 this issue since I started work on 5.0, but it's a lot of work. Ideally
20035 the database system should be flexible enough to let modules register their
20036 own database formats, and that's what I'm going to try and do for 5.1.
20037 It's not too large a step from there to adding more flexibility in database
20038 format (e.g. Berkeley DB or MySQL), though that's probably aiming a bit too
20039 high for now. "Real" DBMS support, as in actually using a database server
20040 for the online data, is a more distant issue; the majority of SQL-related
20041 comments I've seen so far have been to allow easier read access to the
20042 data, e.g. to display information on a web page, and for that periodic
20043 syncs are sufficient.
20044
20045 >a way for modules which add commands to say.. Nickserv to dynamicly add items to help files without the need to edit the .lang files.
20046
20047 Already doable, add a "HELP" callback.
20048
20049 >possibly add sendpass commands for encrypted passwords? ;)
20050
20051 RTFM, not possible ;) or do you mean a way for the user to reset the
20052 password? If the latter, I'm considering doing that through the AUTH
20053 system instead (/ns reauth -> read mail -> /ns auth NNN -> /ns set password
20054 or something like that).
20055
20056 >maybe a second mode for memoserv, currently, you have either forward on or off, i'd like to have a 'Notify' command, which will send me a memo just saying "You have a new memo" and possibly the command for reading it, but leaving it in the database.
20057
20058 /ms set forward copy
20059
20060 --Andrew Church
20061 achurch@achurch.org
20062 http://achurch.org/
20063
20064
20065 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Tue Jul 13 20:59:08 2004
20066 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
20067 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20068 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20069 Message-ID: <mailman.67.1098597730.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
20070
20071 As always, thanks for the responce.. I'll have to take a closer look at the module API for the HELP callback (there are so many! probably missed that one)
20072
20073 With sendpass on encrypted passwords, i meant the latter.. sorry, should have been more clear there.
20074
20075 Looks like i'm starting to get rusty with my services commands, will take a closer look at the help files later today :)
20076
20077 Thanks again :)
20078
20079 /****************************************
20080 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
20081 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
20082 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
20083 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
20084 ****************************************/
20085
20086
20087 /****************************************
20088 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
20089 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
20090 * Sent - 2004-07-14 12:31:14
20091 * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20092 ****************************************/
20093
20094 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
20095
20096 >>ok, now for a couple of suggestions of my own..
20097 >>a "Standardised" database format, which would allow modules to create and maintain databases in the same way as services would (so the database module would be totally independant from other modules). Having to code a database from scratch for services ca
20098 >>n be frustrating.
20099 >
20100 > This is what my "some progress" is aiming for. I've been aware of
20101 >this issue since I started work on 5.0, but it's a lot of work. Ideally
20102 >the database system should be flexible enough to let modules register their
20103 >own database formats, and that's what I'm going to try and do for 5.1.
20104 >It's not too large a step from there to adding more flexibility in database
20105 >format (e.g. Berkeley DB or MySQL), though that's probably aiming a bit too
20106 >high for now. "Real" DBMS support, as in actually using a database server
20107 >for the online data, is a more distant issue; the majority of SQL-related
20108 >comments I've seen so far have been to allow easier read access to the
20109 >data, e.g. to display information on a web page, and for that periodic
20110 >syncs are sufficient.
20111 >
20112 >>a way for modules which add commands to say.. Nickserv to dynamicly add items to help files without the need to edit the .lang files.
20113 >
20114 > Already doable, add a "HELP" callback.
20115 >
20116 >>possibly add sendpass commands for encrypted passwords? ;)
20117 >
20118 > RTFM, not possible ;) or do you mean a way for the user to reset the
20119 >password? If the latter, I'm considering doing that through the AUTH
20120 >system instead (/ns reauth -> read mail -> /ns auth NNN -> /ns set password
20121 >or something like that).
20122 >
20123 >>maybe a second mode for memoserv, currently, you have either forward on or off, i'd like to have a 'Notify' command, which will send me a memo just saying "You have a new memo" and possibly the command for reading it, but leaving it in the database.
20124 >
20125 > /ms set forward copy
20126 >
20127 > --Andrew Church
20128 > achurch@achurch.org
20129 > http://achurch.org/
20130 >
20131 >------------------------------------------------------------------
20132 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
20133 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
20134 >.
20135
20136 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
20137
20138
20139
20140
20141
20142 From brightside at quasinet.org Wed Jul 14 21:11:17 2004
20143 From: brightside at quasinet.org (BrightSide)
20144 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20145 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20146 In-Reply-To: <40f4ab62.70244@achurch.org>
20147 Message-ID: <200471561117.832436@MARVIN>
20148
20149 My wishlist for 5.1:
20150
20151 1a) Support for the Ultimate3 ircd protocol :)
20152 1b) Option in ChanServ to specify who get the channel-admin mode (founder, founder & SOPs, none) defaults to founder
20153
20154 2) An ability in MemoServ to split channel memos and send one memo to each of those who have access to channel memos. Maybe a settable option in module config
20155
20156 -BrightSide-
20157
20158
20159
20160
20161 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 14 13:50:32 2004
20162 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20163 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20164 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20165 In-Reply-To: <200471561117.832436@MARVIN>
20166 Message-ID: <40f4bea8.70265@achurch.org>
20167
20168 >1a) Support for the Ultimate3 ircd protocol :)
20169
20170 Noted. (No promises, though... maaaybe if you get enough people to
20171 pester me ;) )
20172
20173 >1b) Option in ChanServ to specify who get the channel-admin mode (founder, founder & SOPs, none) defaults to founder
20174
20175 I admit handling of the channel admin/owner mode was only added in as
20176 a "might as well use it" sort of thing. I'm not sure I like the idea of
20177 adding yet another ChanServ option, though. As far as I understand it
20178 (correct me if I'm wrong), channel owner mode is just like protected (+a)
20179 except that it can't be unset by other +a users; if that's the case, I'm
20180 not sure there's much reason to use it at all--after all, ChanServ will
20181 always let the founder unban, rejoin, and get +a back as needed. (And
20182 internally, channel owner mode support is a pain because different ircds
20183 use different mode letters for it.)
20184
20185 What would people think of just doing away with channel owner mode
20186 support entirely?
20187
20188 >2) An ability in MemoServ to split channel memos and send one memo to each of those who have access to channel memos. Maybe a settable option in module config
20189
20190 Channel memos is one thing I've been meaning to revisit for a while;
20191 thanks for reminding me. The channel memo system is a major hack as is,
20192 with no notification or anything else that can be done for nicknames. So
20193 let me pose a question: What would you (anyone feel free to reply) want to
20194 use channel memos for? In what cases would you want to send a memo to a
20195 channel, and who would you want to read the memo? I've got a few redesign
20196 possibilities in mind, but to avoid leading questions, I won't mention them
20197 right now; just assume channel memos could do anything you want, and tell
20198 me what you'd want them to do.
20199
20200 --Andrew Church
20201 achurch@achurch.org
20202 http://achurch.org/
20203
20204
20205 From lordbergee at comcast.net Tue Jul 13 23:11:26 2004
20206 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
20207 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20208 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20209 In-Reply-To: <40f4bea8.70265@achurch.org>
20210 References: <40f4bea8.70265@achurch.org>
20211 Message-ID: <40F4CE8E.7020909@comcast.net>
20212
20213 Andrew Church wrote:
20214 > As far as I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong), channel owner
20215 > mode is just like protected (+a) except that it can't be unset by
20216 > other +a users; if that's the case, I'm not sure there's much reason
20217 > to use it at all--after all, ChanServ will always let the founder
20218 > unban, rejoin, and get +a back as needed.
20219 > What would people think of just doing away with channel owner
20220 > mode support entirely?
20221
20222 At least on Unreal that is not quite true. The mode +q (which is used
20223 to indicated owner on Unreal) allows you to set or remove channel modes
20224 +u (auditorium mode) and +L (channel linking). It also allows you to
20225 set/remove +a or +q from users on the channel (and services doesn't
20226 enforce +q on anyone, regardless of whether one is the founder). And of
20227 course, there's the stuff related to kicking, as a user with +q, you can
20228 kick any +a or +q users from the channel, and can't be kicked yourself
20229 unless the user trying also has +q. Last but not least, if this feature
20230 is enabled, +q also grants the user a different prefix, which a lot of
20231 users like to indicate at a glance who runs the channel.
20232 On Unreal, given that having it is the only way one can set two channel
20233 modes without using services, I think it's a good idea to keep the
20234 support for it in place. I would also make the suggestion that if
20235 ChanServ enforce is on, that the channel owner mode be enforced if
20236 another user removes it. :)
20237
20238 Bergee
20239
20240
20241 From idontwantthisshit at hotmail.com Wed Jul 14 01:03:57 2004
20242 From: idontwantthisshit at hotmail.com (DeadNotBuried .)
20243 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20244 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20245 Message-ID: <BAY1-F407cSIvX7PC5l00017fa3@hotmail.com>
20246
20247
20248 > >2) An ability in MemoServ to split channel memos and send one memo to
20249 >each of those who have access to channel memos. Maybe a settable option in
20250 >module config
20251 >
20252 > Channel memos is one thing I've been meaning to revisit for a while;
20253 >thanks for reminding me. The channel memo system is a major hack as is,
20254 >with no notification or anything else that can be done for nicknames. So
20255 >let me pose a question: What would you (anyone feel free to reply) want to
20256 >use channel memos for? In what cases would you want to send a memo to a
20257 >channel, and who would you want to read the memo? I've got a few redesign
20258 >possibilities in mind, but to avoid leading questions, I won't mention them
20259 >right now; just assume channel memos could do anything you want, and tell
20260 >me what you'd want them to do.
20261 >
20262 > --Andrew Church
20263
20264 personally i don't see much use for channel memo's at all, but peronally i
20265 would think that sending it to a channel/nick level would be best
20266 eg
20267 /msg memoserv send #channel v text ( which sends a memo to each nick on the
20268 vop list or above for the channel)
20269 or
20270 /msg memoserv send #channel h text ( which sends a memo to each nick on the
20271 hop list or above for the channel)
20272 or
20273 /msg memoserv send #channel 100 text ( which sends a memo to each nick on
20274 the channel list with access level 100 or above)
20275 etc
20276
20277 _________________________________________________________________
20278 Play Love Hunt to win a $9000 holiday and find love!
20279 http://mobilecentral.ninemsn.com.au/mclovehunt/lovehunt.aspx
20280
20281
20282
20283 From alisor at softhome.net Wed Jul 14 01:35:13 2004
20284 From: alisor at softhome.net (Ali Sor)
20285 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20286 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20287 References: <40f4923b.70175@achurch.org>
20288 Message-ID: <005d01c4697d$8100fa90$0800000a@citir>
20289
20290 Hello i have some suggestions about 5.1
20291
20292 1- Domain ban system. With conf lines or commands registering from given
20293 domains can be forbidden. Better is limiting the mail auth system like,
20294 "only mail from *@ircservices.za.net can register nick" or " *@lamer.org
20295 cant register nicks at this network"
20296
20297 2- ns/cs info ALL command can be used by Services operators. So that they
20298 can give info to users if there is no services admin online.
20299
20300 3- Log checking from IRC. smth like /ns changes nick or /cs changes #channel
20301 command. And this gives info of mail/founder/password changes info from IRC
20302 so no need to check all the log files. There can be a limit for this.(30 day
20303 etc)
20304
20305 4- Access infos : Info of accesses. Who give the access at a channel,when
20306 etc.
20307
20308
20309 ----- Original Message -----
20310 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
20311 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
20312 Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 4:46 AM
20313 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20314
20315
20316 > >I'm just curious what kind of new stuff we should be expecting in IRC
20317 > >Services 5.1. Have you got a plan for what you'd like to add or is it
20318 > >going to be what people suggest?
20319 >
20320 > I'm always open to suggestions, but here are some of the things I'm
20321 > thinking about:
20322 >
20323 > - At least some progress toward support for MySQL/etc. databases
20324 > - A wider variety of statistics from StatServ
20325 > - More flexible logging (e.g. separate "main" log and "event" log)
20326 > - Some way to simplify the configuration process (a configuration module
20327 > for the HTTP interface, for example)
20328 >
20329 > And before anyone asks (because I know someone will...), no, I won't
20330 > add a BotServ.
20331 >
20332 > --Andrew Church
20333 > achurch@achurch.org
20334 > http://achurch.org/
20335 >
20336 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
20337 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
20338 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
20339
20340
20341
20342 From azoff at se.linux.org Wed Jul 14 03:22:53 2004
20343 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
20344 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20345 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20346 In-Reply-To: <40f4923b.70175@achurch.org>
20347 References: <40f4923b.70175@achurch.org>
20348 Message-ID: <40F5097D.6050108@se.linux.org>
20349
20350 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
20351 Hash: SHA1
20352
20353 Andrew Church wrote:
20354 | - At least some progress toward support for MySQL/etc. databases
20355
20356 What type of database are you using now? Something you have wrote
20357 yourself? Pesonaly I don't think mysql is a good idea, it will be on
20358 heavy load if it's a medmium network.
20359
20360 | - More flexible logging (e.g. separate "main" log and "event" log)
20361
20362 This would help while checking logs..
20363
20364 | - Some way to simplify the configuration process (a configuration module
20365 | for the HTTP interface, for example)
20366
20367 This should be useful if you don't have a shell on the server.
20368
20369
20370 Cheers!
20371 - --
20372 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
20373 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
20374 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
20375 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
20376
20377 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20378 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
20379 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
20380
20381 iD8DBQFA9Ql8eY7jmtvbDP0RAmnNAJ90nFxpbiU2MaO6SSXB9LW02BlgLQCeLyoU
20382 cVEY++WmZKmiZzntURxPMi8=
20383 =wtRi
20384 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
20385
20386
20387 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 14 20:32:27 2004
20388 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20389 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20390 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20391 In-Reply-To: <40F5097D.6050108@se.linux.org>
20392 Message-ID: <40f51af8.72756@achurch.org>
20393
20394 >| - At least some progress toward support for MySQL/etc. databases
20395 >
20396 >What type of database are you using now? Something you have wrote
20397 >yourself? Pesonaly I don't think mysql is a good idea, it will be on
20398 >heavy load if it's a medmium network.
20399
20400 The current format is a flat file, and hacked at that to retain
20401 compatibility with the format used in 4.5. I had intended to redo the
20402 format for 5.0, but it was too much work at the time to redesign the
20403 database system with the needed modularity.
20404
20405 As far as DBMS support goes, (I mentioned this in an earlier message
20406 as well, but) most of the requests I've had are in order for other programs
20407 to be able to easily access Services' databases, and for that a periodic
20408 sync to disk (same as for the current flat-file format) ought to be
20409 sufficient. I don't share your pessimism that the load for using a DBMS
20410 in real time would be unmanageable, but due to the significant changes
20411 required such a feature is much farther off.
20412
20413 --Andrew Church
20414 achurch@achurch.org
20415 http://achurch.org/
20416
20417
20418 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Jul 14 10:52:38 2004
20419 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
20420 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20421 Subject: [IRCServices] Small bug in Unreal3.2.1
20422 Message-ID: <mailman.68.1098597730.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
20423
20424 I have found that services seems to enforce Channel mode +O on local opers.. I think that services doesnt react to the new Unreal settings allowing local opers in +O channels.
20425
20426 /****************************************
20427 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
20428 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
20429 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
20430 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
20431 ****************************************/
20432
20433
20434
20435
20436 From vjeko at starfriend.com Wed Jul 14 11:01:51 2004
20437 From: vjeko at starfriend.com (Vjeko Konc)
20438 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20439 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20440 Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.2.20040714200000.0292ee28@127.0.0.1>
20441
20442
20443
20444 Andrew Church wrote:
20445 > Channel memos is one thing I've been meaning to revisit for a while;
20446 >thanks for reminding me. The channel memo system is a major hack as is,
20447 >with no notification or anything else that can be done for nicknames. So
20448 >let me pose a question: What would you (anyone feel free to reply) want to
20449 >use channel memos for? In what cases would you want to send a memo to a
20450 >channel, and who would you want to read the memo? I've got a few redesign
20451 >possibilities in mind, but to avoid leading questions, I won't mention them
20452 >right now; just assume channel memos could do anything you want, and tell
20453 >me what you'd want them to do.
20454
20455 As it is now I use channel memos as a bulletin board for my ops, leaving
20456 messages about anything I feel they might need to know; who was banned
20457 lately and why, major changes to the channel's access list, or just basic
20458 and/or channel policy reminders. Highly usable.
20459
20460 What I'd like to see at some point is a way to check if a memo sent to an
20461 individual have been read, as well as a channel memo notification for
20462 everyone with the required access.
20463
20464 Under the assumption that channel memos could do anything, I'd have the
20465 option to send a persistent notification to my ops notifying them every
20466 time they come online, or at least each time they come into the channel in
20467 question, that they have unread channel memos waiting until they've
20468 actually read all new memos. Maybe by flagging certain memos as important
20469 somehow, e.g. SEND {nickname | channel} [flag] memo-text.
20470
20471
20472 Vjeko Konc
20473
20474 ---
20475 When cryptography is outlawed,
20476 bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
20477
20478
20479
20480 From medice at gmx.at Wed Jul 14 11:34:58 2004
20481 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
20482 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20483 Subject: [IRCServices] Small bug in Unreal3.2.1
20484 In-Reply-To: <20040714175557.25567gmx1@mx030.gmx.net>
20485 References: <20040714175557.25567gmx1@mx030.gmx.net>
20486 Message-ID: <40F57CD2.9060601@gmx.at>
20487
20488 Craig McLure wrote:
20489 > I have found that services seems to enforce Channel mode +O on local opers.. I think that services doesnt react to the new Unreal settings allowing local opers in +O channels.
20490 >
20491
20492 as far as i know, this is not a bug, but a feature (a rather senseless
20493 one in my opinion)
20494 the fact, that a user is local-op (umode +O) is NOT distributed on other
20495 servers (including services) - try taking a look on remote local-ops -
20496 they may have umode h and stuff, but you'll not find +O
20497 don't know why this stuff is not globalized (same with effects of
20498 snomasks...) it seems to be some kind of policy in doing so...
20499 maybe call the unreal-coders ;) - not sending oper-info is certainly not
20500 worthy for traffic-limitation, since there should only be a few opers
20501 and their info-sets are supposed to be limited in the same way ;)
20502
20503 (maybe i leave a note on their bugtracker...)
20504
20505 greets
20506 /medice
20507
20508
20509
20510 From lordbergee at comcast.net Wed Jul 14 16:39:51 2004
20511 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
20512 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20513 Subject: [IRCServices] MemoServ Info Display Bug
20514 Message-ID: <40F5C447.2010809@comcast.net>
20515
20516 Howdy all,
20517 Found a little bug in the MemoServ info command's display. If you have
20518 a registered nickname (no special admin privileges) and execute /msg
20519 memoserv info you'll see:
20520
20521 -MemoServ- You currently have no memos.
20522 -MemoServ- Your memo limit is 20.
20523 -MemoServ- You will be notified of new memos at logon and when they arrive.
20524
20525 Now type /msg memoserv info someoneelse (someoneelse doesn't even have
20526 to be a registered nickname) and you will see:
20527
20528 -MemoServ- someoneelse currently has no memos.
20529 -MemoServ- someoneelse's memo limit is 20.
20530 -MemoServ- someoneelse is notified of new memos at logon and when they
20531 arrive.
20532
20533 Just a minor display problem as MemoServ still provides you with the
20534 information about your nickname and not whatever you may tell it. I
20535 believe MemoServ should just ignore the invalid parameter you pass to it
20536 and still use "you" and "your" in its output. I have tested this with
20537 IRCServices 5.0.36 on Red Hat Linux 9.0 linked to Unreal 3.2.1. :)
20538
20539 Bergee
20540
20541
20542 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 15 10:34:30 2004
20543 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20544 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20545 Subject: [IRCServices] Small bug in Unreal3.2.1
20546 In-Reply-To: <40f5735b.76515@mail.achurch.org>
20547 Message-ID: <40f5df55.74467@achurch.org>
20548
20549 >I have found that services seems to enforce Channel mode +O on local opers.. I think that services doesnt react to the new Unreal settings allowing local opers in +O channels.
20550
20551 Services has no way to know about local opers, since their mode +o
20552 doesn't get propogated. (Or has this changed too?)
20553
20554 --Andrew Church
20555 achurch@achurch.org
20556 http://achurch.org/
20557
20558
20559 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 15 10:40:50 2004
20560 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20561 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20562 Subject: [IRCServices] MemoServ Info Display Bug
20563 In-Reply-To: <40F5C447.2010809@comcast.net>
20564 Message-ID: <40f5e0ae.75416@achurch.org>
20565
20566 Fixed, thanks for the report.
20567
20568 --Andrew Church
20569 achurch@achurch.org
20570 http://achurch.org/
20571
20572 >Howdy all,
20573 > Found a little bug in the MemoServ info command's display. If you have
20574 >a registered nickname (no special admin privileges) and execute /msg
20575 >memoserv info you'll see:
20576 >
20577 >-MemoServ- You currently have no memos.
20578 >-MemoServ- Your memo limit is 20.
20579 >-MemoServ- You will be notified of new memos at logon and when they arrive.
20580 >
20581 >Now type /msg memoserv info someoneelse (someoneelse doesn't even have
20582 >to be a registered nickname) and you will see:
20583 >
20584 >-MemoServ- someoneelse currently has no memos.
20585 >-MemoServ- someoneelse's memo limit is 20.
20586 >-MemoServ- someoneelse is notified of new memos at logon and when they
20587 >arrive.
20588 >
20589 >Just a minor display problem as MemoServ still provides you with the
20590 >information about your nickname and not whatever you may tell it. I
20591 >believe MemoServ should just ignore the invalid parameter you pass to it
20592 >and still use "you" and "your" in its output. I have tested this with
20593 >IRCServices 5.0.36 on Red Hat Linux 9.0 linked to Unreal 3.2.1. :)
20594 >
20595 >Bergee
20596 >
20597 >------------------------------------------------------------------
20598 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
20599 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
20600
20601
20602 From lordbergee at comcast.net Wed Jul 14 19:48:11 2004
20603 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
20604 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20605 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20606 Message-ID: <40F5F06B.3080707@comcast.net>
20607
20608 Hello again,
20609 I'm running Unreal 3.2.1 and IRCServices 5.0.36 on Red Hat Linux 9.0
20610 with a 1.7 GHz Celeron. Earlier today I noticed that as a regular user
20611 I am able to mode lock channel modes +O or +A on. Doing this then makes
20612 a channel where I was the founder into a channel that only IRCops (+O)
20613 or Admins (+A) can join. Given that as a regular user I would then not
20614 be permitted to join my own channel I suggest that only IRCops and above
20615 be able to mode lock channel mode O and only Admins be able to do the
20616 same for channel mode A.
20617
20618 Bergee
20619
20620
20621 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 15 11:53:57 2004
20622 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20623 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20624 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20625 In-Reply-To: <40F5F06B.3080707@comcast.net>
20626 Message-ID: <40f5f27a.75644@achurch.org>
20627
20628 This has been brought up before, and I won't be changing this
20629 behavior; this is a classic case of DDTT. (Don't Do That Then: if an
20630 unusual action produces an undesired result, then the obvious solution is
20631 to simply not perform that action. For example, pounding on your keyboard
20632 can cause keys to fly off, but that's not a defect in the keyboard--DDTT.)
20633
20634 --Andrew Church
20635 achurch@achurch.org
20636 http://achurch.org/
20637
20638 >Hello again,
20639 > I'm running Unreal 3.2.1 and IRCServices 5.0.36 on Red Hat Linux 9.0
20640 >with a 1.7 GHz Celeron. Earlier today I noticed that as a regular user
20641 >I am able to mode lock channel modes +O or +A on. Doing this then makes
20642 >a channel where I was the founder into a channel that only IRCops (+O)
20643 >or Admins (+A) can join. Given that as a regular user I would then not
20644 >be permitted to join my own channel I suggest that only IRCops and above
20645 >be able to mode lock channel mode O and only Admins be able to do the
20646 >same for channel mode A.
20647 >
20648 >Bergee
20649 >
20650 >------------------------------------------------------------------
20651 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
20652 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
20653
20654
20655 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Jul 14 19:59:38 2004
20656 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
20657 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20658 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20659 Message-ID: <mailman.69.1098597730.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
20660
20661 This is questionable, and adds some complexity to services, imo, at the end of the day, if you can SET mlock +A and +O, then you can also unset it. making 'Only admin can set this mlock' code redundant.
20662
20663 Just my 2c.
20664
20665 /****************************************
20666 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
20667 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
20668 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
20669 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
20670 * Andy didnt respond to my fanmail! *cries* ;D
20671 ****************************************/
20672
20673
20674 /****************************************
20675 * From - Bergee <lordbergee@comcast.net>
20676 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
20677 * Sent - 2004-07-15 03:48:11
20678 * Subject - [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20679 ****************************************/
20680
20681 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
20682
20683 >Hello again,
20684 > I'm running Unreal 3.2.1 and IRCServices 5.0.36 on Red Hat Linux 9.0
20685 >with a 1.7 GHz Celeron. Earlier today I noticed that as a regular user
20686 >I am able to mode lock channel modes +O or +A on. Doing this then makes
20687 >a channel where I was the founder into a channel that only IRCops (+O)
20688 >or Admins (+A) can join. Given that as a regular user I would then not
20689 >be permitted to join my own channel I suggest that only IRCops and above
20690 >be able to mode lock channel mode O and only Admins be able to do the
20691 >same for channel mode A.
20692 >
20693 >Bergee
20694 >
20695 >------------------------------------------------------------------
20696 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
20697 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
20698 >.
20699
20700 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
20701
20702
20703
20704
20705
20706 From Rottman3D at yahoo.com Wed Jul 14 20:11:26 2004
20707 From: Rottman3D at yahoo.com (Rottman3D@yahoo.com)
20708 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20709 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20710 In-Reply-To: <40f5f27a.75644@achurch.org>
20711 References: <40F5F06B.3080707@comcast.net>
20712 <40f5f27a.75644@achurch.org>
20713 Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.2.20040714230314.02d5b870@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
20714
20715 True, users will learn quickly if they lock themselves out of the channel.
20716 Maybe a feature with a more useful future is the ability to deny some modes
20717 from being MLOCK'ed. Maybe a line in the conf file such as 'Restrict-mlock
20718 "tnOA"'. Then use the ircd to set the mode on channel creation if that mode
20719 should be on. I'm not sure if this has come up before, a quick search of
20720 the archives leads me to say it hasn't.
20721
20722 -R
20723
20724
20725
20726
20727 From lordbergee at comcast.net Wed Jul 14 20:11:50 2004
20728 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
20729 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20730 Subject: [IRCServices] Suggestion: AKICK kick reason format change
20731 Message-ID: <40F5F5F6.7070602@comcast.net>
20732
20733 Howdy,
20734 Recently some users on my network have taken to adding AKICKs for
20735 people with the reason "KICK by SomeOtherUser" and then using AKICK
20736 enforce to cause ChanServ to kick the user with the reason "KICK by
20737 SomeOtherUser". This of course looks exactly like the kick reason if
20738 SomeOtherUser had used cs kick, which is slightly confusing to users,
20739 especially new ones.
20740 Therefore I suggest that when ChanServ kicks a user because of an AKICK
20741 it use a format something like "AKICK by RealNickname (reason here)"
20742 where RealNickname is the nick of the user that added the AKICK. I
20743 realize this is somewhat of an education problem of the users, but it
20744 strikes me as somewhat similar to prefixing channel entry messages with
20745 the channel name (to prevent people from faking actual ChanServ
20746 messages). Granted it's probably not as serious, but still slightly
20747 confusing if you're new to IRC. :)
20748 I'm curious what other people think about this. Anyone have any other
20749 thoughts about this?
20750
20751 Bergee
20752
20753
20754 From lordbergee at comcast.net Wed Jul 14 20:13:53 2004
20755 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
20756 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20757 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20758 In-Reply-To: <40f5f27a.75644@achurch.org>
20759 References: <40f5f27a.75644@achurch.org>
20760 Message-ID: <40F5F671.9050700@comcast.net>
20761
20762 Andrew Church wrote:
20763 > This has been brought up before, and I won't be changing this
20764 > behavior; this is a classic case of DDTT.
20765
20766 Whoops, guess I didn't search hard enough then, my fault. :) I
20767 suppose that is true in terms of a solution. I was really suggesting it
20768 because the IRCd won't let normal users set the mode and it followed to
20769 me that neither should services. :)
20770
20771 Craig McLure wrote:
20772 > This is questionable, and adds some complexity to services, imo, at
20773 > the end of the day, if you can SET mlock +A and +O, then you can also
20774 > unset it. making 'Only admin can set this mlock' code redundant.
20775
20776 I was actually trying to suggest that similar to how ChanServ treats
20777 +r, a normal user simply not be allowed to include modes O or A in the
20778 mode lock at all. :)
20779
20780 Bergee
20781
20782
20783 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 15 12:25:16 2004
20784 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20785 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20786 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20787 In-Reply-To: <40F5F671.9050700@comcast.net>
20788 Message-ID: <40f5f997.76043@achurch.org>
20789
20790 > > This is questionable, and adds some complexity to services, imo, at
20791 > > the end of the day, if you can SET mlock +A and +O, then you can also
20792 > > unset it. making 'Only admin can set this mlock' code redundant.
20793 >
20794 > I was actually trying to suggest that similar to how ChanServ treats
20795 >+r, a normal user simply not be allowed to include modes O or A in the
20796 >mode lock at all. :)
20797
20798 Which, as Craig says, requires more complexity than the current code
20799 (which doesn't differentiate between opers and regular users at all).
20800 This is my main technical objection to adding such a feature--the added
20801 complexity outweighs the (negligible) benefit provided.
20802
20803 --Andrew Church
20804 achurch@achurch.org
20805 http://achurch.org/
20806
20807
20808 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 15 12:50:29 2004
20809 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
20810 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20811 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20812 In-Reply-To: <6.1.1.1.2.20040714230314.02d5b870@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
20813 Message-ID: <40f5ff5e.76057@achurch.org>
20814
20815 >True, users will learn quickly if they lock themselves out of the channel.
20816 >Maybe a feature with a more useful future is the ability to deny some modes
20817 >from being MLOCK'ed. Maybe a line in the conf file such as 'Restrict-mlock
20818 >"tnOA"'. Then use the ircd to set the mode on channel creation if that mode
20819 >should be on. I'm not sure if this has come up before, a quick search of
20820 >the archives leads me to say it hasn't.
20821
20822 This is an interesting idea, and could work well with earlier
20823 suggestions of allowing the initial mode lock to be configurable. I'll
20824 think about it.
20825
20826 --Andrew Church
20827 achurch@achurch.org
20828 http://achurch.org/
20829
20830
20831 From loliveira at neoline.com.br Wed Jul 14 23:54:46 2004
20832 From: loliveira at neoline.com.br (Luiz Oliveira)
20833 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20834 Subject: [IRCServices] Suggestion: HTTP recirect module
20835 Message-ID: <1089874486.4761.10.camel@PO219.al.neoline.com.br>
20836
20837 Hi,
20838
20839 My suggestion would be for being possible to create more hosts (Virtual
20840 Host) for module to redirect URLs.
20841
20842 Example:
20843
20844 http://users.domain.net/~nick
20845 http://channels.domain.net/~channel
20846
20847 ~ Luiz
20848
20849
20850
20851 From brightside at quasinet.org Fri Jul 16 06:59:55 2004
20852 From: brightside at quasinet.org (BrightSide)
20853 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20854 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services 5.1 Features
20855 In-Reply-To: <200471516537.076693@MARVIN>
20856 Message-ID: <2004716155955.004446@MARVIN>
20857
20858 >?Noted. ?(No promises, though... maaaybe if you get enough people
20859 >?to ?pester me ;) )
20860
20861 pester, pester, pester! :)
20862
20863 But on a more serious note: if it will be any help, I'll be more
20864 than happy to share my hacked Bahamut protocol module which I'm
20865 currently using for Ultimate3. (Running on irc.quasinet.org for
20866 anyone who got some idle time and wanting to see it in action)
20867
20868 >?I admit handling of the channel admin/owner mode was only added
20869 >?in ?as a "might as well use it" sort of thing. ?I'm not sure I
20870 >?like the ?idea of adding yet another ChanServ option, though. ?As
20871 >?far as I ?understand it (correct me if I'm wrong), channel owner
20872 >?mode is just ?like protected (+a) except that it can't be unset
20873 >?by other +a ?users; if that's the case, I'm not sure there's much
20874 >?reason to use ?it at all--after all, ChanServ will always let the
20875 >?founder unban, ?rejoin, and get +a back as needed. ?(And
20876 >?internally, channel owner ?mode support is a pain because
20877 >?different ircds use different mode ?letters for it.)
20878 >
20879 >?What would people think of just doing away with channel owner
20880 >?mode ?support entirely?
20881
20882 I don't have any experience with other ircd's so I can't answer for
20883 them, but on Ultimate the +a is used in much the same way as halfop
20884 except that it is one step above chan-op instead of one step below.
20885 Channel-Admins can give and remove mode +a for other users, chanops
20886 can not. Chanops are also not able to kick admins out of the
20887 channel, in the same way that halfops are not allowed to kick
20888 chanops. When a new channel is created, the first user is given
20889 chanops status and for this reason it's necessary for services to
20890 be able to set this mode. There is no way normal users can set this
20891 themselves without requiring assistance from an ircoper.
20892
20893 The reason I want this to be specifiable is because some users want
20894 to use this as a "founder only" mode, and some want to use it as a
20895 mode given to the founder and all co-founders (a.k.a SOPs). I have
20896 also seen some clients break because the mode is outside the
20897 RFC1459 spesifications, so I believe that some users might find it
20898 more annoying than helpful so they want to disable it completely,
20899 in other words make chanserv not set the mode at all. But these
20900 needs varies from channel to channel.
20901
20902 >?Channel memos is one thing I've been meaning to revisit for a ?
20903 >?while; thanks for reminding me. ?The channel memo system is a
20904 >?major ?hack as is, with no notification or anything else that can
20905 >?be done ?for nicknames. ?So let me pose a question: ?What would
20906 >?you (anyone ?feel free to reply) want to use channel memos for? ?
20907 >?In what cases ?would you want to send a memo to a channel, and
20908 >?who would you want ?to read the memo? ?I've got a few redesign
20909 >?possibilities in mind, ?but to avoid leading questions, I won't
20910 >?mention them right now; ?just assume channel memos could do
20911 >?anything you want, and tell me ?what you'd want them to do.
20912 >
20913
20914 I see channel memos as a simple way of informing all operators of a
20915 channel about channel events without requiring them to be online.
20916 This could be messages informing them of new operators, channel
20917 guildelines etc. etc. It's an easy way to reach everyone at the
20918 same time so you can be sure they got the message, and there's no
20919 need for channel-users to create their own mailinglist or a forum
20920 board. From my own experience, I have found this very handy in
20921 channels with users from all over the world, as it's impossible to
20922 reach everyone at the same time because of timezones :)I see
20923 channel memos as a simple way of informing all operators of a
20924 channel about channel events without requiring them to be online.
20925 This could be messages informing them of new operators, channel
20926 guildelines etc. etc. It's an easy way to reach everyone at the
20927 same time so you can be sure they got the message, and there's no
20928 need for channel-users to create their own mailinglist or a forum
20929 board. From my own experience, I have found this very useful in
20930 channels with users from all over the world, as it's impossible to
20931 reach everyone at the same time because of timezones :)
20932
20933 Also, a final wish:
20934
20935 3) I've noticed there are a callback for "receive message" to
20936 capture all messages sent from a server to services but I have not
20937 yet found any way to capture all messages sent from services to a
20938 server. It would be useful to support server-to-server compression
20939 and encryption.
20940
20941 -BrightSide-
20942
20943
20944
20945
20946
20947 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Thu Jul 15 07:19:05 2004
20948 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
20949 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20950 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20951 Message-ID: <20040715141905.90936.qmail@web53107.mail.yahoo.com>
20952
20953 this feature to restrict modes from the mlock command
20954 should be available to services admins and not only to
20955 someone with access to the conf file. so this may be
20956 added as a command: /os set restrictmlock [modes]
20957
20958 =====
20959 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
20960
20961
20962 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Thu Jul 15 07:25:22 2004
20963 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
20964 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20965 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal modelock issue
20966 Message-ID: <20040715142522.32637.qmail@web53106.mail.yahoo.com>
20967
20968 this feature to restrict modes from the mlock command
20969 should be available to services admins and not only to
20970 someone with access to the conf file. so this may be
20971 added as a command: /os set restrictmlock [modes]
20972
20973 =====
20974 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
20975
20976
20977 From irc at teknet.com.tr Thu Jul 15 16:59:50 2004
20978 From: irc at teknet.com.tr (Okan Karasoy)
20979 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
20980 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick Enforcer Holding Problem
20981 Message-ID: <ef444723299c4dffc64a052323c26e6e@teknet.com.tr>
20982
20983 Hi there,
20984 While we were using 5.0.31 we didn't experience any Nick Enforce problems, but when we upgraded to 5.0.36, like Bergee, we had similar problems with NickServ Enforcer holding a nick for longer than was necessary. The only difference with our situation is that Nick linking is not active in our services.
20985 The nicks that are caught in the Nick Enforcer are not released for a very long period of time.
20986 The Nick Enforcer settings in the modules.conf are as follows:
20987 NSEnforcerUser tutkal
20988 #NSEnforcerUser enforcer@localhost.net
20989 NSForceNickChange
20990 NSReleaseTimeout 30s
20991 We have tested this problem on our own nicks which have been released from Nick Enforcer after 30 seconds. We have tried this out by registering a new nick, setting the Enforce option on, and still the nick was released after 30 seconds. But unfortunately some nicks are held in the Nick Enforcer for two to three hours.
20992 We have no idea at all as to why this is happening, and we would appreciate it if someone could shed some light on this problem, and help us.
20993
20994 Thank you for all your time and assistance.
20995
20996 Okan Karasoy
20997 -------------- next part --------------
20998 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
20999 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040715/7f683f51/attachment.htm
21000 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jul 16 08:12:14 2004
21001 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
21002 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21003 Subject: [IRCServices] Nick Enforcer Holding Problem
21004 In-Reply-To: <ef444723299c4dffc64a052323c26e6e@teknet.com.tr>
21005 Message-ID: <40f70f87.02446@achurch.org>
21006
21007 This is probably the same problem (it also occurs on nick drops).
21008
21009 --Andrew Church
21010 achurch@achurch.org
21011 http://achurch.org/
21012
21013 >--===============0195564303==
21014 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
21015 > boundary="--0E79C1A997A8CF7B7CDEA2D7E9F4FF5C"
21016 >
21017 >----0E79C1A997A8CF7B7CDEA2D7E9F4FF5C
21018 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"
21019 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
21020 >
21021 >Hi there,
21022 >While we were using 5.0.31 we didn't experience any Nick Enforce problems, but when we upgraded to 5.0.36, like Bergee, we had similar problems with NickServ Enforcer holding a nick for longer than was necessary. The only difference with our situation is
21023 >that Nick linking is not active in our services.
21024 >The nicks that are caught in the Nick Enforcer are not released for a very long period of time.
21025 >The Nick Enforcer settings in the modules.conf are as follows:
21026 >NSEnforcerUser tutkal
21027 >#NSEnforcerUser enforcer@localhost.net
21028 >NSForceNickChange
21029 >NSReleaseTimeout 30s
21030 >We have tested this problem on our own nicks which have been released from Nick Enforcer after 30 seconds. We have tried this out by registering a new nick, setting the Enforce option on, and still the nick was released after 30 seconds. But unfortunately
21031 > some nicks are held in the Nick Enforcer for two to three hours.
21032 >We have no idea at all as to why this is happening, and we would appreciate it if someone could shed some light on this problem, and help us.
21033 >
21034 >Thank you for all your time and assistance.
21035 >
21036 >Okan Karasoy
21037 >
21038 >----0E79C1A997A8CF7B7CDEA2D7E9F4FF5C
21039 >Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-9"
21040 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
21041 >
21042 >Hi there, <BR>While we were using 5.0.31 we didn't experience any Nick Enforce problems, but when we upgraded to 5.0.36, like Bergee, we had similar problems with NickServ Enforcer holding a nick for longer than was necessary. The only difference with our
21043 > situation is that Nick linking is not active in our services. <BR>The nicks that are caught in the Nick Enforcer are not released for a very long period of time. <BR>The Nick Enforcer settings in the modules.conf are as follows:<BR>NSEnforcerUser&nbsp;&n
21044 >bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; tutkal<BR>#NSEnforcerUser&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <A href="mailto:enforcer@localhost.net">enforcer@localhost.net</A><BR>NSForceNickChange<BR>NSReleaseTimeout&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 30s<BR>We have tested this problem on our own nicks whic
21045 >h have been released from Nick Enforcer after 30 seconds. We have tried this out by registering a new nick, setting the Enforce option on, and still the nick was released after 30 seconds. But unfortunately some nicks are held in the
21046 >Nick Enforcer for two to three hours. <BR>We have no idea at all as to why this is happening, and we would appreciate it if someone could shed some light on this problem, and help us. <BR><BR>Thank you for all your time and assistance.<BR><BR>Okan Karasoy
21047 ><BR>
21048 >----0E79C1A997A8CF7B7CDEA2D7E9F4FF5C--
21049 >
21050 >
21051 >
21052 >--===============0195564303==
21053 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
21054 >MIME-Version: 1.0
21055 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
21056 >Content-Disposition: inline
21057 >
21058 >------------------------------------------------------------------
21059
21060
21061 From ircservices at utonet.org Sun Jul 18 18:08:19 2004
21062 From: ircservices at utonet.org (arcane)
21063 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21064 Subject: [IRCServices] Suggestion: AKICK kick reason format change
21065 In-Reply-To: <40F5F5F6.7070602@comcast.net>
21066 References: <40F5F5F6.7070602@comcast.net>
21067 Message-ID: <1090199298.2488.26.camel@wbar7.chi1-4-8-134-069.chi1.dsl-verizon.net>
21068
21069 I can definitely see the validity of this claim. As much as founders
21070 wish their chanops were perfectly behaved, this "bug" is a marvelous way
21071 to trick many ordinary users into thinking someone else banned them.
21072
21073 If, however, you want usage of AKICK to remain anonymous, ChanServ could
21074 at least have it be prefixed with "AKICK", "(AKICK)", or something
21075 similar. Personally I think just saying "AKICK by nickname" is
21076 acceptable since it's not like many other ChanServ features are
21077 anonymous anyway.
21078
21079 No matter what route this takes, I think it should definitely show who
21080 placed an AKICK somewhere.
21081
21082 Arcane - UtoNet Service Administrator
21083
21084 On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 22:11, Bergee wrote:
21085 > Howdy,
21086 > Recently some users on my network have taken to adding AKICKs for
21087 > people with the reason "KICK by SomeOtherUser" and then using AKICK
21088 > enforce to cause ChanServ to kick the user with the reason "KICK by
21089 > SomeOtherUser". This of course looks exactly like the kick reason if
21090 > SomeOtherUser had used cs kick, which is slightly confusing to users,
21091 > especially new ones.
21092 > Therefore I suggest that when ChanServ kicks a user because of an AKICK
21093 > it use a format something like "AKICK by RealNickname (reason here)"
21094 > where RealNickname is the nick of the user that added the AKICK. I
21095 > realize this is somewhat of an education problem of the users, but it
21096 > strikes me as somewhat similar to prefixing channel entry messages with
21097 > the channel name (to prevent people from faking actual ChanServ
21098 > messages). Granted it's probably not as serious, but still slightly
21099 > confusing if you're new to IRC. :)
21100 > I'm curious what other people think about this. Anyone have any other
21101 > thoughts about this?
21102 >
21103 > Bergee
21104 >
21105 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
21106 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
21107 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
21108 >
21109 >
21110
21111
21112
21113 From vjeko at starfriend.com Mon Jul 19 00:35:19 2004
21114 From: vjeko at starfriend.com (Vjeko Konc)
21115 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21116 Subject: [IRCServices] Suggestion: AKICK kick reason format change
21117 In-Reply-To: <1090199298.2488.26.camel@wbar7.chi1-4-8-134-069.chi1.dsl-v
21118 erizon.net>
21119 References: <40F5F5F6.7070602@comcast.net>
21120 <1090199298.2488.26.camel@wbar7.chi1-4-8-134-069.chi1.dsl-verizon.net>
21121 Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.2.20040719090538.0292f6f0@127.0.0.1>
21122
21123 arcane wrote:
21124 >If, however, you want usage of AKICK to remain anonymous, ChanServ could
21125 >at least have it be prefixed with "AKICK", "(AKICK)", or something
21126 >similar. Personally I think just saying "AKICK by nickname" is
21127 >acceptable since it's not like many other ChanServ features are
21128 >anonymous anyway.
21129 >
21130 >
21131 >No matter what route this takes, I think it should definitely show who
21132 >placed an AKICK somewhere.
21133
21134 I agree wholeheartedly, I don't see why AKICK should be more anonymous than
21135 the ChanServ KICK command, making it prone for abuse. If nothing else, adding
21136 "AKICK by nickname" would make it more consistent. ;-)
21137
21138
21139
21140 Vjeko Konc
21141
21142 ---
21143 When cryptography is outlawed,
21144 bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
21145
21146
21147
21148 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri Jul 23 02:43:42 2004
21149 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
21150 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21151 Subject: [IRCServices] noop feature
21152 Message-ID: <20040723094342.64133.qmail@web53110.mail.yahoo.com>
21153
21154 hello again:-) Andrew can be added to the next
21155 services release an operserv noop command?
21156
21157 =====
21158 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21159
21160
21161 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Jul 23 13:08:06 2004
21162 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
21163 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21164 Subject: [IRCServices] noop feature
21165 Message-ID: <E1Bo6M1-000NNg-4l@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
21166
21167 does it actually have any use? not seen a use for it yet...
21168
21169 >hello again:-) Andrew can be added to the next
21170 >services release an operserv noop command?
21171 >
21172 >=====
21173 >Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21174 >
21175 >------------------------------------------------------------------
21176 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
21177 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
21178 >
21179
21180
21181
21182 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri Jul 23 14:56:22 2004
21183 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
21184 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21185 Subject: [IRCServices] noop feature
21186 Message-ID: <20040723215622.43548.qmail@web53103.mail.yahoo.com>
21187
21188 useful for test servers. i can use raw to send a noop
21189 but i think it will be more easy and secure the use of
21190 it as an operserv command.
21191
21192 =====
21193 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21194
21195
21196 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Fri Jul 23 15:16:49 2004
21197 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
21198 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21199 Subject: [IRCServices] noop feature
21200 In-Reply-To: <20040723215622.43548.qmail@web53103.mail.yahoo.com>
21201 References: <20040723215622.43548.qmail@web53103.mail.yahoo.com>
21202 Message-ID: <1090621009.11119.12.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
21203
21204 Can you please also explain, why you link a server whose operators you
21205 do not trust?
21206
21207 For testing purposes, the raw command should be enough.
21208 I do not see any point in adding a mostly useless command and creating
21209 additional translation job for translators just because of your test
21210 network.
21211
21212 Regards;
21213 yusuf.
21214
21215 On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 23:56, Dionisios K. wrote:
21216 > useful for test servers. i can use raw to send a noop
21217 > but i think it will be more easy and secure the use of
21218 > it as an operserv command.
21219 >
21220 > =====
21221 > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21222 >
21223 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
21224 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
21225 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
21226
21227
21228
21229 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri Jul 23 16:03:08 2004
21230 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
21231 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21232 Subject: [IRCServices] noop feature
21233 Message-ID: <20040723230308.11018.qmail@web53110.mail.yahoo.com>
21234
21235 if you wait to trust all opers before any link i think
21236 you have 1 or 2 servers to your network if you have
21237 one. ps: please before sending any email calm down...
21238 something useless for you doesnt mean its useless for everyone.
21239
21240 =====
21241 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21242
21243
21244 From mark at ctcp.net Fri Jul 23 16:26:02 2004
21245 From: mark at ctcp.net (M)
21246 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21247 Subject: [IRCServices] noop feature
21248 In-Reply-To: <20040723230308.11018.qmail@web53110.mail.yahoo.com>
21249 Message-ID: <E1Bo9Ry-000GBT-0Y@anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net>
21250
21251 Dionisios K wrote:
21252 > if you wait to trust all opers before any link i think you
21253 > have 1 or 2 servers to your network if you have one. ps:
21254
21255 How a network chooses to expand is down to the network and has no place in
21256 discussion of IRCServices development. Insults are qually inappropriate for
21257 the list.
21258
21259 > please before sending any email calm down...
21260
21261 Listen to your own advice...
21262
21263 > something useless for you doesnt mean its useless for everyone.
21264
21265 This is a discussion list so you will get differing opinions. You have made
21266 one, Yusef has made one. Just because he did not agree is no reason for you
21267 to discount his opinion.
21268
21269 If you want anything added to IRCServices, you need both a good idea and
21270 support. So far you have had one person object and no support. Your response
21271 to the objection did not further your case.
21272
21273 M.
21274
21275
21276
21277 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Jul 24 21:57:49 2004
21278 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
21279 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21280 Subject: [IRCServices] noop feature
21281 In-Reply-To: <20040723094342.64133.qmail@web53110.mail.yahoo.com>
21282 Message-ID: <41025d2c.16261@achurch.org>
21283
21284 >hello again:-) Andrew can be added to the next
21285 >services release an operserv noop command?
21286
21287 I believe this has been discussed before, but this is something that
21288 should be handled at the IRC server and network administration (i.e. human)
21289 levels, and is not worth implementing in Services.
21290
21291 --Andrew Church
21292 achurch@achurch.org
21293 http://achurch.org/
21294
21295
21296 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Sat Jul 24 06:56:39 2004
21297 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
21298 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21299 Subject: [IRCServices] old services databases convert
21300 Message-ID: <20040724135639.73456.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
21301
21302 i have to convert databases from ircservices 4.5.43 to
21303 5.0.36 - what i have to do? after the conversion it
21304 will be 100table?
21305
21306 =====
21307 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21308
21309
21310 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Sat Jul 24 07:03:14 2004
21311 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
21312 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21313 Subject: [IRCServices] old services databases convert
21314 Message-ID: <20040724140314.29944.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com>
21315
21316 100table = stable
21317
21318 =====
21319 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21320
21321
21322 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Jul 24 23:07:09 2004
21323 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
21324 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21325 Subject: [IRCServices] old services databases convert
21326 In-Reply-To: <20040724140314.29944.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com>
21327 Message-ID: <41026d1d.16630@achurch.org>
21328
21329 Services 5.0 can read 4.x databases directly.
21330
21331 --Andrew Church
21332 achurch@achurch.org
21333 http://achurch.org/
21334
21335
21336 From chawmp at cyberarmy.net Sun Jul 25 13:20:28 2004
21337 From: chawmp at cyberarmy.net (Chawmp)
21338 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21339 Subject: [IRCServices] Allocation error: ns unsuspend
21340 In-Reply-To: <20040708194930.CMKR8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
21341 Message-ID: <20040725201935.TPCR6109.mta10-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
21342
21343 Hi again,
21344
21345 I just noticed and patched another bug, quite similar to the last issue I
21346 posted about ("Seg Fault/Bus Error on SQUIT":
21347 http://www.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/2004/003377.html ).
21348
21349 Again, I noticed this one because free() is set up to write a pattern over
21350 memory as it is released on our services host. It wouldn't occur in most
21351 normal circumstances, but might do unpredictably, depending on a lot of
21352 factors, so ought to be fixed.
21353
21354 The problem occurs when unsuspending a nickname that is part of a group in
21355 which no nickname has been used for longer than the NSExpire setting - or
21356 something along those lines.
21357
21358 In modules/nickserv/util.c, unsuspend_nick() does this:
21359
21360 ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21361 NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21362 ...
21363 }
21364
21365 get_nickinfo() will free (NickGroupInfo *)ngi under certain conditions
21366 (roughly as I described above), making the following attempts to dereference
21367 ngi crash the program:
21368
21369 if (!ni) {
21370 module_log("unsuspend: unable to retrieve NickInfo
21371 for %s"
21372 " (nick group %u)", ngi->nicks[i], ngi->id);
21373 continue;
21374 }
21375
21376 ngi would also be used in subsequent loops, so just changing the log message
21377 wouldn't be a solution.
21378
21379 I didn't have a lot of time to investigate the best way to fix this, but
21380 here is the patch I came up with. It seems to do the job, but I would be
21381 grateful if anyone can advise something more suitable. (Lines beginning "+"
21382 were added; noexpire is just set to 1 before the loop, and restored
21383 afterwards, which stops the expiry check. Note that the NSSuspendGrace stuff
21384 only happens a few lines after the call to get_nickinfo(), so for that small
21385 time, nick groups can disappear.).
21386
21387 void unsuspend_nick(NickGroupInfo *ngi, int set_time)
21388 {
21389 time_t now = time(NULL);
21390 + int cache_noexpire = 0;
21391
21392 if (!ngi->suspendinfo) {
21393 module_log("unsuspend: called on non-suspended nick group %u [%s]",
21394
21395 ...
21396
21397 " %u) to %ld", ngi->nicks[ngi->mainnick], ngi->id,
21398 (long)ngi->authset);
21399 }
21400 + cache_noexpire = noexpire;
21401 + noexpire = 1;
21402 ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21403 NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21404 if (!ni) {
21405
21406 ...
21407
21408 }
21409 }
21410 }
21411 + noexpire = cache_noexpire;
21412 }
21413
21414
21415 /*************************************************************************/
21416
21417 --
21418 Tom McIntyre
21419 chawmp@cyberarmy.net
21420
21421
21422
21423
21424 From chawmp at cyberarmy.net Mon Jul 26 05:05:02 2004
21425 From: chawmp at cyberarmy.net (Chawmp)
21426 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21427 Subject: [IRCServices] Allocation error: ns unsuspend [retry]
21428 Message-ID: <20040726120549.PHYF11275.mta09-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
21429
21430 Hi again,
21431
21432 [ I sent this yesterday, but it seems it got put under another thread in the
21433 archive, and didn't actually get sent out to the list, so I'll send it again
21434 in case it gets missed :) ]
21435
21436 I just noticed and patched another bug, quite similar to the last issue I
21437 posted about ("Seg Fault/Bus Error on SQUIT":
21438 http://www.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/2004/003377.html ).
21439
21440 Again, I noticed this one because free() is set up to write a pattern over
21441 memory as it is released on our services host. It wouldn't occur in most
21442 normal circumstances, but might do unpredictably, depending on a lot of
21443 factors, so ought to be fixed.
21444
21445 The problem occurs when unsuspending a nickname that is part of a group in
21446 which no nickname has been used for longer than the NSExpire setting - or
21447 something along those lines.
21448
21449 In modules/nickserv/util.c, unsuspend_nick() does this:
21450
21451 ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21452 NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21453 ...
21454 }
21455
21456 get_nickinfo() will free (NickGroupInfo *)ngi under certain conditions
21457 (roughly as I described above), making the following attempts to dereference
21458 ngi crash the program:
21459
21460 if (!ni) {
21461 module_log("unsuspend: unable to retrieve NickInfo
21462 for %s"
21463 " (nick group %u)", ngi->nicks[i], ngi->id);
21464 continue;
21465 }
21466
21467 ngi would also be used in subsequent loops, so just changing the log message
21468 wouldn't be a solution.
21469
21470 I didn't have a lot of time to investigate the best way to fix this, but
21471 here is the patch I came up with. It seems to do the job, but I would be
21472 grateful if anyone can advise something more suitable. (Lines beginning "+"
21473 were added; noexpire is just set to 1 before the loop, and restored
21474 afterwards, which stops the expiry check. Note that the NSSuspendGrace stuff
21475 only happens a few lines after the call to get_nickinfo(), so for that small
21476 time, nick groups can disappear.).
21477
21478 void unsuspend_nick(NickGroupInfo *ngi, int set_time)
21479 {
21480 time_t now = time(NULL);
21481 + int cache_noexpire = 0;
21482
21483 if (!ngi->suspendinfo) {
21484 module_log("unsuspend: called on non-suspended nick group %u [%s]",
21485
21486 ...
21487
21488 " %u) to %ld", ngi->nicks[ngi->mainnick], ngi->id,
21489 (long)ngi->authset);
21490 }
21491 + cache_noexpire = noexpire;
21492 + noexpire = 1;
21493 ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21494 NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21495 if (!ni) {
21496
21497 ...
21498
21499 }
21500 }
21501 }
21502 + noexpire = cache_noexpire;
21503 }
21504
21505
21506 /*************************************************************************/
21507
21508 --
21509 Tom McIntyre
21510 chawmp@cyberarmy.net
21511
21512
21513
21514
21515 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Jul 26 22:29:50 2004
21516 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
21517 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21518 Subject: [IRCServices] Allocation error: ns unsuspend [retry]
21519 In-Reply-To: <20040726120549.PHYF11275.mta09-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
21520 Message-ID: <41050928.24475@achurch.org>
21521
21522 I did see your original message--it's just that I've been going
21523 through the entire code to find and fix similar bugs as well. I have a
21524 sneaking suspicion that the expire-on-get design plays nasty games with
21525 pointers in the user record too, but as it hasn't seemed to cause any
21526 problems so far, I'm saving that bit of contemplation for 5.1 (which,
21527 incidentally, will also have similar use-after-free checks in the memory
21528 checking code).
21529
21530 At any rate, thanks for the report.
21531
21532 --Andrew Church
21533 achurch@achurch.org
21534 http://achurch.org/
21535
21536 >Hi again,
21537 >
21538 >[ I sent this yesterday, but it seems it got put under another thread in the
21539 >archive, and didn't actually get sent out to the list, so I'll send it again
21540 >in case it gets missed :) ]
21541 >
21542 >I just noticed and patched another bug, quite similar to the last issue I
21543 >posted about ("Seg Fault/Bus Error on SQUIT":
21544 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/2004/003377.html ).
21545 >
21546 >Again, I noticed this one because free() is set up to write a pattern over
21547 >memory as it is released on our services host. It wouldn't occur in most
21548 >normal circumstances, but might do unpredictably, depending on a lot of
21549 >factors, so ought to be fixed.
21550 >
21551 >The problem occurs when unsuspending a nickname that is part of a group in
21552 >which no nickname has been used for longer than the NSExpire setting - or
21553 >something along those lines.
21554 >
21555 >In modules/nickserv/util.c, unsuspend_nick() does this:
21556 >
21557 > ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21558 > NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21559 > ...
21560 > }
21561 >
21562 >get_nickinfo() will free (NickGroupInfo *)ngi under certain conditions
21563 >(roughly as I described above), making the following attempts to dereference
21564 >ngi crash the program:
21565 >
21566 > if (!ni) {
21567 > module_log("unsuspend: unable to retrieve NickInfo
21568 >for %s"
21569 > " (nick group %u)", ngi->nicks[i], ngi->id);
21570 > continue;
21571 > }
21572 >
21573 >ngi would also be used in subsequent loops, so just changing the log message
21574 >wouldn't be a solution.
21575 >
21576 >I didn't have a lot of time to investigate the best way to fix this, but
21577 >here is the patch I came up with. It seems to do the job, but I would be
21578 >grateful if anyone can advise something more suitable. (Lines beginning "+"
21579 >were added; noexpire is just set to 1 before the loop, and restored
21580 >afterwards, which stops the expiry check. Note that the NSSuspendGrace stuff
21581 >only happens a few lines after the call to get_nickinfo(), so for that small
21582 >time, nick groups can disappear.).
21583 >
21584 > void unsuspend_nick(NickGroupInfo *ngi, int set_time)
21585 > {
21586 > time_t now = time(NULL);
21587 >+ int cache_noexpire = 0;
21588 >
21589 > if (!ngi->suspendinfo) {
21590 > module_log("unsuspend: called on non-suspended nick group %u [%s]",
21591 >
21592 >...
21593 >
21594 > " %u) to %ld", ngi->nicks[ngi->mainnick], ngi->id,
21595 > (long)ngi->authset);
21596 > }
21597 >+ cache_noexpire = noexpire;
21598 >+ noexpire = 1;
21599 > ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21600 > NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21601 > if (!ni) {
21602 >
21603 >...
21604 >
21605 > }
21606 > }
21607 > }
21608 >+ noexpire = cache_noexpire;
21609 > }
21610 >
21611 >
21612 >/*************************************************************************/
21613 >
21614 >--
21615 >Tom McIntyre
21616 >chawmp@cyberarmy.net
21617 >
21618 >
21619 >
21620 >------------------------------------------------------------------
21621 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
21622 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
21623
21624
21625 From chawmp at cyberarmy.net Mon Jul 26 11:58:44 2004
21626 From: chawmp at cyberarmy.net (Chawmp)
21627 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21628 Subject: [IRCServices] Allocation error: ns unsuspend [retry]
21629 In-Reply-To: <41050928.24475@achurch.org>
21630 Message-ID: <20040726185911.YXNL17476.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
21631
21632 Yeah... It seems like the kind of problem that could have been lying
21633 undetected in a number of places for some time.
21634
21635 The first bug I posted about took a lot of trial and error to locate
21636 exactly, but with the help of the memory management debugger (among other
21637 things) Valgrind [ http://valgrind.kde.org/ ] I was able to find the source
21638 of this problem much more quickly. If you're not using something like it
21639 already, it might be of help. Of course, to find every bug of this kind you
21640 would need to potentially cause every possible flow-of-control to happen. I
21641 guess picking out appropriate sections to examine, as you were doing, would
21642 make the process more feasible :)
21643
21644 Tom McIntyre
21645 chawmp@cyberarmy.net
21646
21647 > -----Original Message-----
21648 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net [mailto:ircservices-
21649 > bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Church
21650 > Sent: 26 July 2004 14:30
21651 > To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
21652 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Allocation error: ns unsuspend [retry]
21653 >
21654 > I did see your original message--it's just that I've been going
21655 > through the entire code to find and fix similar bugs as well. I have a
21656 > sneaking suspicion that the expire-on-get design plays nasty games with
21657 > pointers in the user record too, but as it hasn't seemed to cause any
21658 > problems so far, I'm saving that bit of contemplation for 5.1 (which,
21659 > incidentally, will also have similar use-after-free checks in the memory
21660 > checking code).
21661 >
21662 > At any rate, thanks for the report.
21663 >
21664 > --Andrew Church
21665 > achurch@achurch.org
21666 > http://achurch.org/
21667 >
21668 > >Hi again,
21669 > >
21670 > >[ I sent this yesterday, but it seems it got put under another thread in
21671 > the
21672 > >archive, and didn't actually get sent out to the list, so I'll send it
21673 > again
21674 > >in case it gets missed :) ]
21675 > >
21676 > >I just noticed and patched another bug, quite similar to the last issue I
21677 > >posted about ("Seg Fault/Bus Error on SQUIT":
21678 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/2004/003377.html ).
21679 > >
21680 > >Again, I noticed this one because free() is set up to write a pattern
21681 > over
21682 > >memory as it is released on our services host. It wouldn't occur in most
21683 > >normal circumstances, but might do unpredictably, depending on a lot of
21684 > >factors, so ought to be fixed.
21685 > >
21686 > >The problem occurs when unsuspending a nickname that is part of a group
21687 > in
21688 > >which no nickname has been used for longer than the NSExpire setting - or
21689 > >something along those lines.
21690 > >
21691 > >In modules/nickserv/util.c, unsuspend_nick() does this:
21692 > >
21693 > > ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21694 > > NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21695 > > ...
21696 > > }
21697 > >
21698 > >get_nickinfo() will free (NickGroupInfo *)ngi under certain conditions
21699 > >(roughly as I described above), making the following attempts to
21700 > dereference
21701 > >ngi crash the program:
21702 > >
21703 > > if (!ni) {
21704 > > module_log("unsuspend: unable to retrieve NickInfo
21705 > >for %s"
21706 > > " (nick group %u)", ngi->nicks[i], ngi->id);
21707 > > continue;
21708 > > }
21709 > >
21710 > >ngi would also be used in subsequent loops, so just changing the log
21711 > message
21712 > >wouldn't be a solution.
21713 > >
21714 > >I didn't have a lot of time to investigate the best way to fix this, but
21715 > >here is the patch I came up with. It seems to do the job, but I would be
21716 > >grateful if anyone can advise something more suitable. (Lines beginning
21717 > "+"
21718 > >were added; noexpire is just set to 1 before the loop, and restored
21719 > >afterwards, which stops the expiry check. Note that the NSSuspendGrace
21720 > stuff
21721 > >only happens a few lines after the call to get_nickinfo(), so for that
21722 > small
21723 > >time, nick groups can disappear.).
21724 > >
21725 > > void unsuspend_nick(NickGroupInfo *ngi, int set_time)
21726 > > {
21727 > > time_t now = time(NULL);
21728 > >+ int cache_noexpire = 0;
21729 > >
21730 > > if (!ngi->suspendinfo) {
21731 > > module_log("unsuspend: called on non-suspended nick group %u [%s]",
21732 > >
21733 > >...
21734 > >
21735 > > " %u) to %ld", ngi->nicks[ngi->mainnick], ngi->id,
21736 > > (long)ngi->authset);
21737 > > }
21738 > >+ cache_noexpire = noexpire;
21739 > >+ noexpire = 1;
21740 > > ARRAY_FOREACH (i, ngi->nicks) {
21741 > > NickInfo *ni = get_nickinfo(ngi->nicks[i]);
21742 > > if (!ni) {
21743 > >
21744 > >...
21745 > >
21746 > > }
21747 > > }
21748 > > }
21749 > >+ noexpire = cache_noexpire;
21750 > > }
21751 > >
21752 > >
21753 > >/************************************************************************
21754 > */
21755 > >
21756 > >--
21757 > >Tom McIntyre
21758 > >chawmp@cyberarmy.net
21759 >
21760
21761
21762
21763
21764 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jul 27 21:00:50 2004
21765 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
21766 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21767 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.37 released
21768 Message-ID: <4106449d.70605@achurch.org>
21769
21770 Services 5.0.37 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
21771
21772 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
21773
21774 a653dfb1b80e8cc71ced042686656983 ircservices-5.0.37.tar.gz
21775 d322600effff0ec5c6785a768e9dac7f ircservices-5.0.37.diff.gz
21776 72315d5c40db36eab27427deeac40bf2 ircservices-5.0.37-1.i386.rpm
21777 7c4659635ec510aff829d6b828c922fd ircservices_5.0.37-1_i386.deb
21778
21779 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
21780
21781 This release collects the fixes for the minor problems reported
21782 recently. This isn't a critical upgrade; if you aren't experiencing any of
21783 these problems, you can upgrade at your convenience.
21784
21785 Changes in version 5.0.37
21786 -------------------------
21787 2004/07/27 Autokicks now prefix the kick reason with "AKICK by <nick>"
21788 to avoid misleading kick messages. Suggested by Bergee
21789 <lordbergee@comcast.net>
21790 2004/07/26 Fixed potential crashes in NickServ UNSUSPEND, DROP, and
21791 LINK (from the nickserv/oldlink module only). Reported
21792 by Tom McIntyre <chawmp@cyberarmy.net>
21793 2004/07/15 Fixed cosmetic bug in MemoServ INFO display. Reported by
21794 Bergee <lordbergee@comcast.net>
21795 2004/07/14 Fixed potential crash on exit when freeing language data.
21796 2004/07/14 Fixed bug causing nickname enforcers to not be removed when
21797 a nickname was deleted. Reported by Bergee
21798 <lordbergee@comcast.net>
21799
21800 --Andrew Church
21801 achurch@achurch.org
21802 http://achurch.org/
21803
21804
21805 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue Jul 27 12:53:07 2004
21806 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
21807 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21808 Subject: [IRCServices] oldlink
21809 Message-ID: <20040727195307.43422.qmail@web53109.mail.yahoo.com>
21810
21811 can someone tell me what is the nickserv oldlink module?
21812
21813 =====
21814 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
21815
21816
21817 From irc at teknet.com.tr Tue Jul 27 16:45:42 2004
21818 From: irc at teknet.com.tr (Okan Karasoy)
21819 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:10 2004
21820 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
21821 Message-ID: <8fdc33cd90b1e705218a381f9fe69d3e@teknet.com.tr>
21822
21823 Hi there, my problem is this, services on our server are constantly shut down. When I look at the services logs, I discover that services are shut down by attacks on the services such as this:
21824 What can you recommend that we do to prevent this from happening?
21825
21826 18:01:20 2004] nickserv/main: Yxdxxpu registered by aqtyy@81.213.125.164 (Soxsdr@hotmail.com)
21827 [Jul 27 18:03:49 2004] Ignored message from Woofgq: ":Woofgq P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Gicj@hotmail.com
21828 [Jul 27 18:03:49 2004] Ignored message from Woofgq: ":Woofgq P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Fybfhb@hotmail.com
21829 [Jul 27 18:03:49 2004] Ignored message from Woofgq: ":Woofgq P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Uimfoi@hotmail.com
21830 [Jul 27 18:03:49 2004] Ignored message from Woofgq: ":Woofgq P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Fczmo@hotmail.com
21831 [Jul 27 18:03:49 2004] Ignored message from Woofgq: ":Woofgq P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Svroii@hotmail.com
21832 [Jul 27 18:03:49 2004] Ignored message from Woofgq: ":Woofgq P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat BrHotY@hotmail.com
21833 [Jul 27 18:03:49 2004] Ignored message from Woofgq: ":Woofgq P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat IMhAQ@hotmail.com
21834 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat HWtI@h$
21835 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Rirlz@$
21836 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Mzuxyw$
21837 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Ostoat$
21838 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Ofjef@$
21839 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat LAtl@h$
21840 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Szwvez$
21841 [Jul 27 18:04:47 2004] Ignored message from Apmbenml: ":Apmbenml P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Vcdr@h$
21842 Jul 27 18:05:04 2004] nickserv/main: Hpml registered by jrccxyt@ti300720a080-1063.bb.online.no (Fgwtnnh@hotmail.com)
21843 [Jul 27 18:05:25 2004] unknown message from server (:irc.teklan.com.tr 441 ChanServ oTOpSy #bebe?im :Odada yoklar)
21844 [Jul 27 17:58:30 2004] Ignored message from ZrBk: ":ZrBk P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat BPaAmG@hotmail$
21845 [Jul 27 17:58:30 2004] Ignored message from ZrBk: ":ZrBk P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Ymmpnjq@hotmai$
21846 [Jul 27 17:58:34 2004] operserv/main: ^^zZz^^: killclones ZrBk
21847 [Jul 27 17:58:34 2004] operserv/main: KILLCLONES: 3 clone(s) matching *!*@dsl81-215-35494.adsl.ttnet.net.tr killed.
21848 [Jul 27 17:58:35 2004] nickserv/main: user record for ZrBk not found
21849 [Jul 27 17:58:35 2004] nickserv/main: user record for ZrBk not found
21850
21851 As seen in the logs, nicks are entering the server, and using the NickServ command /ns register password email@adres.com to register the same nick with a different email address.
21852
21853 I would really appreciate it if you could help us with this situation.
21854 Thank you for your time and help
21855
21856 Okan Karasoy
21857 -------------- next part --------------
21858 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
21859 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040727/83c6de2f/attachment.html
21860 From steffe_riese at yahoo.com Tue Jul 27 14:55:35 2004
21861 From: steffe_riese at yahoo.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Stefan=20Riese?=)
21862 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
21863 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with OperServ
21864 Message-ID: <20040727215535.75541.qmail@web40007.mail.yahoo.com>
21865
21866 Hi!
21867 I have problem to get Access to OperServ on an bahamut
21868 irc server i have set up at home. I am using
21869 ircservices 5.0.36.
21870
21871 I have set up "Admin" as super-user, but when I have
21872 do a /nick Admin in my IRC-client i can't write "/msg
21873 OperServ ADMIN LIST" in my IRC-client. I get Access
21874 denied.
21875
21876 When i look in the logfile i get "operserv/main:
21877 Non-oper Admin!Admin@stefan.sandgatan sent: admin
21878 list"
21879
21880 What is wrong?
21881
21882 Stefan Riese
21883
21884 H?strusk och gr? moln - k?p en resa till solen p? Yahoo! Resor p? adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html
21885
21886
21887 From chris at starglade.org Tue Jul 27 14:58:55 2004
21888 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
21889 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
21890 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with OperServ
21891 In-Reply-To: <20040727215535.75541.qmail@web40007.mail.yahoo.com>
21892 References: <20040727215535.75541.qmail@web40007.mail.yahoo.com>
21893 Message-ID: <4106D01F.8000404@starglade.org>
21894
21895 Stefan Riese wrote:
21896
21897 > Hi!
21898 > I have problem to get Access to OperServ on an bahamut
21899 > irc server i have set up at home. I am using
21900 > ircservices 5.0.36.
21901 >
21902 > I have set up "Admin" as super-user, but when I have
21903 > do a /nick Admin in my IRC-client i can't write "/msg
21904 > OperServ ADMIN LIST" in my IRC-client. I get Access
21905 > denied.
21906 >
21907 > When i look in the logfile i get "operserv/main:
21908 > Non-oper Admin!Admin@stefan.sandgatan sent: admin
21909 > list"
21910 >
21911 > What is wrong?
21912
21913 You need to be opered up and identified to NickServ.
21914
21915 Chris
21916
21917 --
21918 Chris Jenkinson
21919 chris@starglade.org
21920
21921
21922 From medice at gmx.at Tue Jul 27 15:07:11 2004
21923 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
21924 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
21925 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with OperServ
21926 In-Reply-To: <20040727215535.75541.qmail@web40007.mail.yahoo.com>
21927 References: <20040727215535.75541.qmail@web40007.mail.yahoo.com>
21928 Message-ID: <4106D20F.9040207@gmx.at>
21929
21930 Stefan Riese wrote:
21931 > Hi!
21932 > I have problem to get Access to OperServ on an bahamut
21933 > irc server i have set up at home. I am using
21934 > ircservices 5.0.36.
21935 >
21936 > I have set up "Admin" as super-user, but when I have
21937 > do a /nick Admin in my IRC-client i can't write "/msg
21938 > OperServ ADMIN LIST" in my IRC-client. I get Access
21939 > denied.
21940 >
21941 > When i look in the logfile i get "operserv/main:
21942 > Non-oper Admin!Admin@stefan.sandgatan sent: admin
21943 > list"
21944 >
21945 > What is wrong?
21946 >
21947 > Stefan Riese
21948 >
21949
21950 your nick "Admin" has to be registered and identified for in ircservices
21951 your session has to be opered up correctly, so you are allowed to use
21952 services as an services-admin or netadmin (or whatever bahamut is
21953 offering, I'm not familiar with that ircd...)
21954
21955 hth
21956 /medice
21957
21958
21959 From steffe_riese at yahoo.com Tue Jul 27 15:15:54 2004
21960 From: steffe_riese at yahoo.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Stefan=20Riese?=)
21961 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
21962 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with OperServ
21963 In-Reply-To: <4106D01F.8000404@starglade.org>
21964 Message-ID: <20040727221554.13577.qmail@web40005.mail.yahoo.com>
21965
21966 I have registered Admin with NickServ, and /oper to
21967 IRC-operator, but I still can't connect to OperServ.
21968 Access denied.
21969
21970 Stefan Riese
21971
21972 --- Chris Jenkinson <chris@starglade.org> skrev: >
21973 Stefan Riese wrote:
21974 >
21975 > > Hi!
21976 > > I have problem to get Access to OperServ on an
21977 > bahamut
21978 > > irc server i have set up at home. I am using
21979 > > ircservices 5.0.36.
21980 > >
21981 > > I have set up "Admin" as super-user, but when I
21982 > have
21983 > > do a /nick Admin in my IRC-client i can't write
21984 > "/msg
21985 > > OperServ ADMIN LIST" in my IRC-client. I get
21986 > Access
21987 > > denied.
21988 > >
21989 > > When i look in the logfile i get "operserv/main:
21990 > > Non-oper Admin!Admin@stefan.sandgatan sent: admin
21991 > > list"
21992 > >
21993 > > What is wrong?
21994 >
21995 > You need to be opered up and identified to NickServ.
21996 >
21997 > Chris
21998 >
21999 > --
22000 > Chris Jenkinson
22001 > chris@starglade.org
22002 >
22003 >
22004 ------------------------------------------------------------------
22005 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
22006 > visit:
22007 >
22008 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22009 >
22010
22011 H?strusk och gr? moln - k?p en resa till solen p? Yahoo! Resor p? adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html
22012
22013
22014 From quension at mac.com Tue Jul 27 15:55:36 2004
22015 From: quension at mac.com (Trevor Talbot)
22016 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22017 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with OperServ
22018 In-Reply-To: <20040727221554.13577.qmail@web40005.mail.yahoo.com>
22019 Message-ID: <12D2B4CF-E020-11D8-8CC6-0003938D6866@mac.com>
22020
22021 On Tuesday, Jul 27, 2004, at 15:15 US/Pacific, Stefan Riese wrote:
22022
22023 > I have registered Admin with NickServ, and /oper to IRC-operator, but
22024 > I still can't connect to OperServ. Access denied.
22025
22026 In the oper block in ircd.conf, change the access small 'o' to a
22027 capital 'O'. This point of confusion will be corrected in a future
22028 release.
22029
22030 -- Quension
22031
22032
22033
22034 From steffe_riese at yahoo.com Tue Jul 27 16:29:10 2004
22035 From: steffe_riese at yahoo.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Stefan=20Riese?=)
22036 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22037 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with OperServ
22038 In-Reply-To: <12D2B4CF-E020-11D8-8CC6-0003938D6866@mac.com>
22039 Message-ID: <20040727232910.9240.qmail@web40001.mail.yahoo.com>
22040
22041 That was the problem.
22042 Thankyou for your help.
22043
22044 Stefan Riese
22045
22046 --- Trevor Talbot <quension@mac.com> skrev: > On
22047 Tuesday, Jul 27, 2004, at 15:15 US/Pacific,
22048 > Stefan Riese wrote:
22049 >
22050 > > I have registered Admin with NickServ, and /oper
22051 > to IRC-operator, but
22052 > > I still can't connect to OperServ. Access denied.
22053 >
22054 > In the oper block in ircd.conf, change the access
22055 > small 'o' to a
22056 > capital 'O'. This point of confusion will be
22057 > corrected in a future
22058 > release.
22059 >
22060 > -- Quension
22061 >
22062 >
22063 >
22064 ------------------------------------------------------------------
22065 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
22066 > visit:
22067 >
22068 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22069 >
22070
22071 H?strusk och gr? moln - k?p en resa till solen p? Yahoo! Resor p? adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html
22072
22073
22074 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 28 11:26:13 2004
22075 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
22076 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22077 Subject: [IRCServices] oldlink
22078 In-Reply-To: <20040727195307.43422.qmail@web53109.mail.yahoo.com>
22079 Message-ID: <41070ecc.71557@achurch.org>
22080
22081 RTFM
22082
22083 --Andrew Church
22084 achurch@achurch.org
22085 http://achurch.org/
22086
22087 >can someone tell me what is the nickserv oldlink module?
22088 >
22089 >=====
22090 >Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
22091 >
22092 >------------------------------------------------------------------
22093 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
22094 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22095
22096
22097 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 28 11:30:44 2004
22098 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
22099 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22100 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22101 In-Reply-To: <8fdc33cd90b1e705218a381f9fe69d3e@teknet.com.tr>
22102 Message-ID: <4107100d.71573@achurch.org>
22103
22104 >Hi there, my problem is this, services on our server are constantly shut down. When I look at the services logs, I discover that services are shut down by attacks on the services such as this:
22105 >What can you recommend that we do to prevent this from happening?
22106
22107 What exactly is the problem? From the logs you provide it appears
22108 Services is functioning normally.
22109
22110 --Andrew Church
22111 achurch@achurch.org
22112 http://achurch.org/
22113
22114
22115 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Wed Jul 28 02:01:17 2004
22116 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
22117 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22118 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22119 In-Reply-To: <4107100d.71573@achurch.org>
22120 References: <4107100d.71573@achurch.org>
22121 Message-ID: <1091005276.11283.7.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
22122
22123 The problem they have is, that when such an attack starts,
22124 services after some time stop responding, making the ircd quit the link,
22125 and looking at the table of processes shows, that services sits there
22126 with 99% CPU usage, requiring kill -9 to be shut down.
22127
22128 That attack has a simple appearance:
22129 A set of probably trojaned connections, that even reply to simple CTCP
22130 requests, begin connecting, and floodding services with multiple nick
22131 registration commands, changing nicknames, and floodding again,
22132 quitting, reconnecting, and floodding again.
22133
22134 Just before services start responding, notices arrive that it is not
22135 parsing privmsgs anymore, due to network load, but even then it gets
22136 disconnected.
22137
22138 Interestingly, setting it temporarily to readonly mode helped,
22139 apparently it could response.
22140
22141 Currently we have no solution for this kind of attack, those connections
22142 are not detected by the proxy scanner, we assume that these aren't using
22143 proxies at all.
22144
22145 Temporarily /modunload'ing m_nick.so and /close'ing helps to postpone
22146 the issue :-)
22147
22148 Regards;
22149 yusuf.
22150
22151 On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 13:30, Andrew Church wrote:
22152 > >Hi there, my problem is this, services on our server are constantly shut down. When I look at the services logs, I discover that services are shut down by attacks on the services such as this:
22153 > >What can you recommend that we do to prevent this from happening?
22154 >
22155 > What exactly is the problem? From the logs you provide it appears
22156 > Services is functioning normally.
22157 >
22158 > --Andrew Church
22159 > achurch@achurch.org
22160 > http://achurch.org/
22161 >
22162 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
22163 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
22164 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22165 --
22166 ------------------------------------------------------------------
22167 | Yusuf Iskenderoglu | You get to meet all sorts, |
22168 | eMail - uhc0@stud.uni-karlsruhe.de| in this line of work... |
22169 | eMail - s_iskend@ira.uka.de | |
22170 | ICQ UIN : 20587464 \ Slytherin | |
22171 ------------------------------------------------------------------
22172
22173
22174
22175 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Jul 28 18:36:54 2004
22176 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
22177 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22178 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22179 In-Reply-To: <1091005276.11283.7.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
22180 Message-ID: <4107740b.10323@achurch.org>
22181
22182 >The problem they have is, that when such an attack starts,
22183 >services after some time stop responding, making the ircd quit the link,
22184 >and looking at the table of processes shows, that services sits there
22185 >with 99% CPU usage, requiring kill -9 to be shut down.
22186
22187 Is there any way you can look into this with gdb and see where it's
22188 using all its CPU time? I can try repeating the flood here but I suspect
22189 database size is at least a part of the problem.
22190
22191 --Andrew Church
22192 achurch@achurch.org
22193 http://achurch.org/
22194
22195
22196 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Jul 28 12:35:43 2004
22197 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
22198 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22199 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22200 Message-ID: <20040728193543.57172.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
22201
22202 it will be helpful a general limit for the register
22203 command for nicknames and channels?... something like
22204 this: X new registered nicknames and channels per X
22205 minute(s) are allowed. i think an automatic temp
22206 ignore for flooding will also help.
22207
22208 =====
22209 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
22210
22211
22212 From alisor at softhome.net Wed Jul 28 12:54:47 2004
22213 From: alisor at softhome.net (Ali Sor)
22214 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22215 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22216 References: <20040728193543.57172.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
22217 Message-ID: <000b01c474dc$bfd7baf0$0800000a@citir>
22218
22219
22220 # NSRegDelay <time> [RECOMMENDED]
22221 # Sets the minimum length of time between consecutive uses of the
22222 # REGISTER command. If not given, this restriction is disabled.
22223 #
22224 # WARNING: Not setting NSRegDelay, or setting it too low, will not
22225 # only allow "registration flooding", but, if the
22226 # mail-auth module is also loaded, will also allow users
22227 # to abuse this command to send large quantities of mail
22228 # (mailbombs) to arbitrary users!
22229
22230 # NSInitialRegDelay <time> [OPTIONAL]
22231 # Sets the minimum length of time the user must be connected before
22232 # using the REGISTER command for the first time. If not given,
22233 # this restriction is disabled. This option can be helpful in
22234 # preventing malicious bots from flooding your network with
22235 # registrations.
22236
22237 Dont those lines do that?
22238 Although these are for nick register command.
22239
22240
22241 ----- Original Message -----
22242 From: "Dionisios K." <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
22243 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
22244 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:35 PM
22245 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22246
22247
22248 > it will be helpful a general limit for the register
22249 > command for nicknames and channels?... something like
22250 > this: X new registered nicknames and channels per X
22251 > minute(s) are allowed. i think an automatic temp
22252 > ignore for flooding will also help.
22253 >
22254 > =====
22255 > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
22256 >
22257 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
22258 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
22259 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22260
22261
22262 From medice at gmx.at Wed Jul 28 13:31:22 2004
22263 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
22264 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22265 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22266 In-Reply-To: <000b01c474dc$bfd7baf0$0800000a@citir>
22267 References: <20040728193543.57172.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
22268 <000b01c474dc$bfd7baf0$0800000a@citir>
22269 Message-ID: <41080D1A.3030705@gmx.at>
22270
22271 Ali Sor wrote:
22272 > # NSRegDelay <time> [RECOMMENDED]
22273 > # Sets the minimum length of time between consecutive uses of the
22274 > # REGISTER command. If not given, this restriction is disabled.
22275 > #
22276 > # WARNING: Not setting NSRegDelay, or setting it too low, will not
22277 > # only allow "registration flooding", but, if the
22278 > # mail-auth module is also loaded, will also allow users
22279 > # to abuse this command to send large quantities of mail
22280 > # (mailbombs) to arbitrary users!
22281 >
22282 > # NSInitialRegDelay <time> [OPTIONAL]
22283 > # Sets the minimum length of time the user must be connected before
22284 > # using the REGISTER command for the first time. If not given,
22285 > # this restriction is disabled. This option can be helpful in
22286 > # preventing malicious bots from flooding your network with
22287 > # registrations.
22288 >
22289 > Dont those lines do that?
22290 > Although these are for nick register command.
22291 >
22292 not really - if I'm right: this are settings concerning a single user -
22293 so it blocks several registrations by the same user in a short period,
22294 or it blocks registration for totally fresh users up to a certain time.
22295 This is nothing which is preventing a botnet-cloneflood when every
22296 member of the attack is a single user on it's own and may handle like
22297 this...
22298 best strategy might be finding out bad users at connection-time and
22299 remove them instantly - which needs a great deal of knowledge :(
22300
22301 greets
22302 /medice
22303
22304
22305 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jul 29 09:49:36 2004
22306 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
22307 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22308 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22309 In-Reply-To: <20040728193543.57172.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
22310 Message-ID: <41084a95.11351@achurch.org>
22311
22312 >it will be helpful a general limit for the register
22313 >command for nicknames and channels?... something like
22314 >this: X new registered nicknames and channels per X
22315 >minute(s) are allowed.
22316
22317 The problem with this, of course, is it enables denial-of-service
22318 attacks: bring on X bots, have them each register their nick, and then
22319 nobody can use REGISTER for the next Y minutes. The bots don't even have
22320 to stay online, making it harder to track them.
22321
22322 >i think an automatic temp ignore for flooding will also help.
22323
22324 "Flooding", in the sense of "sending too much data for Services to
22325 handle", is unfortunately not that easy to detect--it's largely dependent
22326 on how powerful the machine running Services is. Services already has an
22327 ignore system (as could have been seen from the log originally posted), but
22328 I'm not at all sure of its effectiveness.
22329
22330 --Andrew Church
22331 achurch@achurch.org
22332 http://achurch.org/
22333
22334
22335 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Thu Jul 29 02:37:47 2004
22336 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
22337 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22338 Subject: [IRCServices] Attacks on services
22339 Message-ID: <20040729093747.94823.qmail@web53110.mail.yahoo.com>
22340
22341 for an extremely heavy load from a specific hostname a
22342 kill or an akill may issued from services. so the
22343 abuser will forced to stop and all opers will see the
22344 kill and they will check it.
22345
22346 =====
22347 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
22348
22349
22350 From s.nicholson at gmail.com Mon Aug 2 12:18:03 2004
22351 From: s.nicholson at gmail.com (Stephen Nicholson)
22352 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22353 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv problem
22354 Message-ID: <89dbc8eb040802121874ce2e34@mail.gmail.com>
22355
22356 Hi,
22357
22358 I'm using services version 5.0.37
22359 bahamut-1.8(01)
22360
22361 I'm trying to access operserv. My nick is registered. I'm identified.
22362 I have oper status and my nick is listed in ServicesRoot.
22363
22364 I get access denied whenever I try to use operserv.
22365
22366 I do get a log entry saying I'm not an oper
22367
22368 [Aug 02 20:15:51 2004] operserv/main: Non-oper
22369 xxxx!xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sent: help
22370
22371 I can access oper command but not anything to do with operserv.
22372
22373 Does anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong?
22374
22375
22376 From uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Mon Aug 2 14:05:34 2004
22377 From: uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Yusuf Iskenderoglu)
22378 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22379 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv problem
22380 In-Reply-To: <89dbc8eb040802121874ce2e34@mail.gmail.com>
22381 References: <89dbc8eb040802121874ce2e34@mail.gmail.com>
22382 Message-ID: <1091480734.10997.4.camel@dreadnought.hadiko.de>
22383
22384 Quoting Quension/Trevor about this from his last email:
22385 <quote>
22386 In the oper block in ircd.conf, change the access small 'o' to a
22387 capital 'O'. This point of confusion will be corrected in a future
22388 release.
22389
22390 -- Quension
22391 </quote>
22392
22393 Regards;
22394 yusuf.
22395
22396 On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 21:18, Stephen Nicholson wrote:
22397 > Hi,
22398 >
22399 > I'm using services version 5.0.37
22400 > bahamut-1.8(01)
22401 >
22402 > I'm trying to access operserv. My nick is registered. I'm identified.
22403 > I have oper status and my nick is listed in ServicesRoot.
22404 >
22405 > I get access denied whenever I try to use operserv.
22406 >
22407 > I do get a log entry saying I'm not an oper
22408 >
22409 > [Aug 02 20:15:51 2004] operserv/main: Non-oper
22410 > xxxx!xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sent: help
22411 >
22412 > I can access oper command but not anything to do with operserv.
22413 >
22414 > Does anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong?
22415 >
22416 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
22417 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
22418 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22419
22420
22421
22422 From moontan at dmbroadband.com Wed Aug 4 17:50:26 2004
22423 From: moontan at dmbroadband.com (moontan@dmbroadband.com)
22424 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22425 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanser has trojan/virus
22426 Message-ID: <20040805004718.M54178@deskmedia.com>
22427
22428 Started seing this global msg from out neostats sercureserv.
22429
22430 Global: from SecureServ: Warning, ChanServ is Infected with HTTPSpam
22431 Trojan/Virus. no Action Taken (See http://secure.irc-chat.net/info.php?
22432 viri=HTTPSpam for more info)
22433
22434 can anyone tell me how this is possible? or is it a bug in the secureserv
22435
22436 --
22437 Open WebMail Project (http://DMBroadband.com)
22438
22439
22440
22441 From idontwantthisshit at hotmail.com Wed Aug 4 18:12:59 2004
22442 From: idontwantthisshit at hotmail.com (DeadNotBuried .)
22443 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22444 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanser has trojan/virus
22445 Message-ID: <BAY1-F14pXp4Pqsh1lB00008677@hotmail.com>
22446
22447 you should use secureserv's exclude command to exclude your services server
22448 from being checked
22449
22450 eg /msg secureserv exclude services.your.net 1 irc services server
22451
22452
22453 >
22454 >Started seing this global msg from out neostats sercureserv.
22455 >
22456 >Global: from SecureServ: Warning, ChanServ is Infected with HTTPSpam
22457 >Trojan/Virus. no Action Taken (See http://secure.irc-chat.net/info.php?
22458 >viri=HTTPSpam for more info)
22459 >
22460 >can anyone tell me how this is possible? or is it a bug in the secureserv
22461 >
22462
22463 _________________________________________________________________
22464 Feeling spent? Apply here for emergency plastic surgery:
22465 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;9577691;9687279;r?http://www.promo.com.au/virgincreditcard/plasticsurgery/track.cfm?source=P08
22466
22467
22468
22469 From smokey23 at gmail.com Thu Aug 5 08:12:02 2004
22470 From: smokey23 at gmail.com (Smokey23)
22471 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:11 2004
22472 Subject: [IRCServices] -irc.myserver.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
22473 127.0.0.1(0@127.0.0.1) (No link block named '127.0.0.1')
22474 [0@127.0.0.1.2478]
22475 Message-ID: <beb7ecdc0408050812f2584b1@mail.gmail.com>
22476
22477 Problem: I'm setting up an IRCD and trying to connect Services to it.
22478 The IRCD is up and running smoothly. Services seems to be configured
22479 correctly (no major errors when starting it).
22480
22481 When I try to connect it, I get an error that there is no matching
22482 link configuration. I've seen this before on the list archives but I
22483 don't believe the older one applies to me.
22484
22485 I'll try to organize this a bit for you. First the services log, then
22486 the servinces settings followed by the IRCD error and settings.
22487
22488 ### ircservices Log ###
22489 [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] IRC Services 5.0.37 starting up
22490 [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
22491 (No matching link configuration) [0@127.0.0.1.2202])
22492 [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing
22493 Link: [127.0.0.1] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
22494 [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
22495 ####################
22496
22497 ### ircservices.conf ###
22498 RemoteServer 127.0.0.1 6666 "Services"
22499 LocalAddress 127.0.0.1
22500 ServerName "127.0.0.1"
22501 ServiceUser "services@services.myserver.com"
22502 ####################
22503
22504 ### IRC Error ###
22505 -irc.myserver.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
22506 127.0.0.1(0@127.0.0.1) (No link block named '127.0.0.1')
22507 [0@127.0.0.1.2478]
22508 ###############
22509
22510 ### Unreal 3.2.1 IRCD Settings ###
22511 allow {
22512 ip *@127.0.0.1;
22513 hostname *@127.0.0.1;
22514 class servers;
22515 password "Services";
22516 maxperip 100;
22517 };
22518 listen *:6666
22519 {
22520 options
22521 {
22522 serversonly;
22523 };
22524 };
22525 link 127.0.0.1
22526 {
22527 username *;
22528 hostname 127.0.0.1;
22529 bind-ip *;
22530 password-receive "Services";
22531 class servers;
22532 };
22533 #############################
22534
22535 Does anyone see any obvious errors I have made? Did I forget to post
22536 something important? Let me know and I'll reply ASAP. I've read the
22537 manuals for both Unreal and ircservices.
22538
22539 Thanks in advance for the help!
22540
22541 Smokey
22542
22543
22544 From smokey23 at gmail.com Thu Aug 5 09:12:55 2004
22545 From: smokey23 at gmail.com (Smokey23)
22546 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22547 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: -irc.myserver.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
22548 127.0.0.1(0@127.0.0.1) (No link block named '127.0.0.1')
22549 [0@127.0.0.1.2478]
22550 In-Reply-To: <beb7ecdc0408050812f2584b1@mail.gmail.com>
22551 References: <beb7ecdc0408050812f2584b1@mail.gmail.com>
22552 Message-ID: <beb7ecdc0408050912296f159d@mail.gmail.com>
22553
22554 I'm sorry, I found the problem. After trying about 30 combinations
22555 today, and 3 hours yesterday, I was able to get it linked. Sorry to
22556 have wasted your time.
22557
22558 Smokey
22559
22560 On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:12:02 -0700, Smokey23 <smokey23@gmail.com> wrote:
22561 > Problem: I'm setting up an IRCD and trying to connect Services to it.
22562 > The IRCD is up and running smoothly. Services seems to be configured
22563 > correctly (no major errors when starting it).
22564 >
22565 > When I try to connect it, I get an error that there is no matching
22566 > link configuration. I've seen this before on the list archives but I
22567 > don't believe the older one applies to me.
22568 >
22569 > I'll try to organize this a bit for you. First the services log, then
22570 > the servinces settings followed by the IRCD error and settings.
22571 >
22572 > ### ircservices Log ###
22573 > [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] IRC Services 5.0.37 starting up
22574 > [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Link denied
22575 > (No matching link configuration) [0@127.0.0.1.2202])
22576 > [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing
22577 > Link: [127.0.0.1] (Link denied (No matching link configuration)))
22578 > [Aug 05 07:41:10 2004] Read error from server: Connection reset by peer
22579 > ####################
22580 >
22581 > ### ircservices.conf ###
22582 > RemoteServer 127.0.0.1 6666 "Services"
22583 > LocalAddress 127.0.0.1
22584 > ServerName "127.0.0.1"
22585 > ServiceUser "services@services.myserver.com"
22586 > ####################
22587 >
22588 > ### IRC Error ###
22589 > -irc.myserver.com- *** LocOps -- Link denied for
22590 > 127.0.0.1(0@127.0.0.1) (No link block named '127.0.0.1')
22591 > [0@127.0.0.1.2478]
22592 > ###############
22593 >
22594 > ### Unreal 3.2.1 IRCD Settings ###
22595 > allow {
22596 > ip *@127.0.0.1;
22597 > hostname *@127.0.0.1;
22598 > class servers;
22599 > password "Services";
22600 > maxperip 100;
22601 > };
22602 > listen *:6666
22603 > {
22604 > options
22605 > {
22606 > serversonly;
22607 > };
22608 > };
22609 > link 127.0.0.1
22610 > {
22611 > username *;
22612 > hostname 127.0.0.1;
22613 > bind-ip *;
22614 > password-receive "Services";
22615 > class servers;
22616 > };
22617 > #############################
22618 >
22619 > Does anyone see any obvious errors I have made? Did I forget to post
22620 > something important? Let me know and I'll reply ASAP. I've read the
22621 > manuals for both Unreal and ircservices.
22622 >
22623 > Thanks in advance for the help!
22624 >
22625 > Smokey
22626 >
22627
22628
22629 From raz0r at linux.uludag.edu.tr Sat Aug 7 14:50:28 2004
22630 From: raz0r at linux.uludag.edu.tr (Samet Beyribey)
22631 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22632 Subject: [IRCServices] Something strange
22633 Message-ID: <20040807215028.15610.qmail@stu.uludag.edu.tr>
22634
22635 hi,
22636
22637 we're using jIRC at our site for connecting irc, and default nick is
22638 Guest(on jirc)
22639
22640 problem starts here,
22641 a user "Guest" can register the Guest nickname..
22642 There are no problems with Guest123(numbers), nobody can register it
22643 this is really strange
22644
22645 how can i stop people trying to register the nick Guest?
22646
22647 Best regards,
22648 Samet
22649
22650
22651
22652 From medice at gmx.at Sat Aug 7 16:29:30 2004
22653 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
22654 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22655 Subject: [IRCServices] Something strange
22656 In-Reply-To: <20040807215028.15610.qmail@stu.uludag.edu.tr>
22657 References: <20040807215028.15610.qmail@stu.uludag.edu.tr>
22658 Message-ID: <411565DA.8010500@gmx.at>
22659
22660 Samet Beyribey wrote:
22661 > hi,
22662 > we're using jIRC at our site for connecting irc, and default nick is
22663 > Guest(on jirc)
22664 > problem starts here,
22665 > a user "Guest" can register the Guest nickname..
22666 > There are no problems with Guest123(numbers), nobody can register it
22667 > this is really strange
22668 > how can i stop people trying to register the nick Guest?
22669 > Best regards,
22670 > Samet
22671 >
22672 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
22673 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
22674 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22675 >
22676 >
22677 you may forbid the nick guest (/nickserv forbid Guest)
22678
22679 greets
22680 /medice
22681
22682
22683
22684
22685 From medice at gmx.at Sat Aug 7 16:35:50 2004
22686 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
22687 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22688 Subject: [IRCServices] Something strange
22689 In-Reply-To: <411565DA.8010500@gmx.at>
22690 References: <20040807215028.15610.qmail@stu.uludag.edu.tr>
22691 <411565DA.8010500@gmx.at>
22692 Message-ID: <41156756.60104@gmx.at>
22693
22694
22695 > you may forbid the nick guest (/nickserv forbid Guest)
22696 >
22697 > greets
22698 > /medice
22699
22700 oooops - I rethought the problem... - if forbid noone my use it anymore...
22701
22702 but you can register the nick by yourself - set it noexpire and
22703 deactivate the nick-changing...
22704
22705 greets
22706 /medice
22707
22708
22709 From chawmp at cyberarmy.net Sat Aug 7 17:04:54 2004
22710 From: chawmp at cyberarmy.net (Chawmp)
22711 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22712 Subject: [IRCServices] Something strange
22713 In-Reply-To: <41156756.60104@gmx.at>
22714 Message-ID: <20040808000432.VAOC16768.mta08-svc.ntlworld.com@excelsior>
22715
22716 You could even Q:Line it (or in fact, Q:Line Guest* if U:Lines' forced nick
22717 changes override Q:Lined nicks - I can't remember).
22718
22719 Tom McIntyre
22720 chawmp@cyberarmy.net
22721
22722 > -----Original Message-----
22723 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net [mailto:ircservices-
22724 > bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Medice
22725 > Sent: 08 August 2004 00:36
22726 > To: IRC Services General Mailing List
22727 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Something strange
22728 >
22729 >
22730 > > you may forbid the nick guest (/nickserv forbid Guest)
22731 > >
22732 > > greets
22733 > > /medice
22734 >
22735 > oooops - I rethought the problem... - if forbid noone my use it anymore...
22736 >
22737 > but you can register the nick by yourself - set it noexpire and
22738 > deactivate the nick-changing...
22739 >
22740 > greets
22741 > /medice
22742 >
22743 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
22744 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
22745 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22746
22747
22748
22749 From msmith at acmecorp.org Mon Aug 9 15:00:42 2004
22750 From: msmith at acmecorp.org (Michael D. Smith)
22751 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22752 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on verbiage...
22753 Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20040809175842.02025790@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
22754
22755 Where would one find the verbiage returned when you have chanserv set to
22756 restrict access to register channels to Services Admins only?
22757
22758 We'd like to change the verbiage returned when someone tries to register a
22759 channel so that it directs them to the proper people in our network so they
22760 *can* get their channel registered.
22761
22762 I poked around the FAQ and online docs, but can't find it.
22763
22764 Thanks for the assist....
22765
22766 Thanks for your patronage.
22767
22768 Regards,
22769 Mike
22770
22771 Chief Network Administrator
22772
22773 "Net boy, net girl/Send your impulse 'round the world/
22774 Put your message in a modem/And throw it in the Cyber Sea"
22775 Lyrics "Virtruality" - Album "Test for Echo" - Rush, 1996 (Lee, Lifeson,
22776 Peart)
22777
22778
22779
22780
22781 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Aug 10 12:29:57 2004
22782 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
22783 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22784 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on verbiage...
22785 In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040809175842.02025790@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
22786 Message-ID: <4118423f.21645@achurch.org>
22787
22788 >Where would one find the verbiage returned when you have chanserv set to
22789 >restrict access to register channels to Services Admins only?
22790 >
22791 >We'd like to change the verbiage returned when someone tries to register a
22792 >channel so that it directs them to the proper people in our network so they
22793 >*can* get their channel registered.
22794
22795 Messages used by Services are stored in the language files (lang/*.l);
22796 however, there is no special message returned for the case you're asking
22797 about, only a generic "access denied" message (so trying to change that
22798 message would result in the changed message being given out in all cases
22799 where the message was used). To accomplish what you want to do, you'll
22800 have to modify the source directly.
22801
22802 --Andrew Church
22803 achurch@achurch.org
22804 http://achurch.org/
22805
22806
22807 From moontan at dmbroadband.com Fri Aug 13 21:10:41 2004
22808 From: moontan at dmbroadband.com (moontan@dmbroadband.com)
22809 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22810 Subject: [IRCServices] bug or problem?
22811 Message-ID: <20040814040957.M74332@deskmedia.com>
22812
22813
22814 can anyone help me with this error?
22815
22816
22817 [Aug 03 21:39:57 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in
22818 mask: *
22819 [Aug 03 21:39:57 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in
22820 mask: *
22821
22822 --
22823 Open WebMail Project (http://DMBroadband.com)
22824
22825
22826
22827 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Aug 14 07:10:37 2004
22828 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
22829 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22830 Subject: [IRCServices] bug or problem?
22831 Message-ID: <mailman.70.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
22832
22833 The akill format is ident@host, so for example:
22834
22835 /os akill del user@host
22836
22837 And the akill has to be on the akill list. You cant do wildcard removal.
22838
22839 Although, a note on what IRCd you use, version of services, and command causing the (possible) bug would be useful
22840
22841 /****************************************
22842 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
22843 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
22844 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
22845 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
22846 ****************************************/
22847
22848
22849 /****************************************
22850 * From - moontan <moontan@dmbroadband.com>
22851 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
22852 * Sent - 05:10:41 @ 2004-08-14
22853 * Subject - [IRCServices] bug or problem?
22854 ****************************************/
22855
22856 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
22857
22858 >
22859 >can anyone help me with this error?
22860 >
22861 >
22862 >[Aug 03 21:39:57 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in
22863 >mask: *
22864 >[Aug 03 21:39:57 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in
22865 >mask: *
22866 >
22867 >--
22868 >Open WebMail Project (http://DMBroadband.com)
22869 >
22870 >
22871 >------------------------------------------------------------------
22872 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
22873 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
22874 >.
22875
22876 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
22877
22878
22879
22880
22881 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Aug 15 00:18:00 2004
22882 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
22883 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22884 Subject: [IRCServices] bug or problem?
22885 In-Reply-To: <411e1dc5.03175@mail.achurch.org>
22886 Message-ID: <411e2d7e.13415@achurch.org>
22887
22888 >The akill format is ident@host, so for example:
22889 >
22890 >/os akill del user@host
22891
22892 Actually, it looks like an autokill of "*" somehow got onto the
22893 autokill list (this shouldn't be possible, hence the "BUG:" tag).
22894
22895 OP: How did such an autokill get into your database?
22896
22897 --Andrew Church
22898 achurch@achurch.org
22899 http://achurch.org/
22900
22901
22902 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Aug 14 14:26:57 2004
22903 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
22904 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22905 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
22906 Message-ID: <mailman.71.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
22907
22908 Please Note: This 'bug' has been pointed out to the Unreal team, however, there responce (in their own words) was: "get services" (yodaone) and "This is what services are for. I mean then we need to implement the same thing for +k, for +b, etc. And soon enough, you're creating more problems than you solved. Have services take care of it." (codemastr).
22909
22910 During a netmerge, if one side of the split has +O on a channel and the other doesnt, a non-oper can sit on the side without +O and when the net merges, force his way into the opers only channel. Its easily reproduced, and can be a quite annoying problem, if enough people join while the net is split.
22911
22912 So, i'm officially requesting that this feature be added to Services. I'm not entirly sure how you will be able to identify a local oper, but i'm sure you will find a way.
22913
22914 Thanks.
22915
22916 /****************************************
22917 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
22918 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
22919 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
22920 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
22921 ****************************************/
22922
22923
22924
22925
22926 From chris at starglade.org Sat Aug 14 14:45:47 2004
22927 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
22928 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22929 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
22930 Message-ID: <411E880B.5090205@starglade.org>
22931
22932 Craig McLure wrote:
22933 > Please Note: This 'bug' has been pointed out to the Unreal team, however, there responce (in their own words) was: "get services" (yodaone) and "This is what services are for. I mean then we need to implement the same thing for +k, for +b, etc. And soon enough, you're creating more problems than you solved. Have services take care of it." (codemastr).
22934 >
22935 > During a netmerge, if one side of the split has +O on a channel and the other doesnt, a non-oper can sit on the side without +O and when the net merges, force his way into the opers only channel. Its easily reproduced, and can be a quite annoying problem, if enough people join while the net is split.
22936 >
22937 > So, i'm officially requesting that this feature be added to Services. I'm not entirly sure how you will be able to identify a local oper, but i'm sure you will find a
22938
22939 When a local oper opers up, there is nothing sent to the rest of the
22940 network. There is no way to do this - it has to be either a change to
22941 the IRCd to send local oper changes, or to upgrade the person to a full
22942 global oper.
22943
22944 You should ideally not use the +O mode, and instead use invite-only with
22945 ChanServ - this way ChanServ will kick out any people not permitted in
22946 the channel if they somehow got in, and you don't need to bother with
22947 the other stuff. You could set +O as well, of course.
22948
22949 Chris
22950
22951 --
22952 Chris Jenkinson
22953 chris@starglade.org
22954
22955
22956 From medice at gmx.at Sat Aug 14 15:04:45 2004
22957 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
22958 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22959 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
22960 In-Reply-To: <411E880B.5090205@starglade.org>
22961 References: <411E880B.5090205@starglade.org>
22962 Message-ID: <411E8C7D.5020209@gmx.at>
22963
22964 > When a local oper opers up, there is nothing sent to the rest of the
22965 > network. There is no way to do this - it has to be either a change to
22966 > the IRCd to send local oper changes, or to upgrade the person to a full
22967 > global oper.
22968 >
22969 > You should ideally not use the +O mode, and instead use invite-only with
22970 > ChanServ - this way ChanServ will kick out any people not permitted in
22971 > the channel if they somehow got in, and you don't need to bother with
22972 > the other stuff. You could set +O as well, of course.
22973 >
22974 > Chris
22975 >
22976
22977 well this is a flaw in unrealircd (a rather heavy one in my opinion) and
22978 i don't think that any services-package out there should feel
22979 responsible on react on other's flaws - maybe someone is coding a module
22980 for this problem...
22981 the whole localop-stuff on unrealircd is a real sh.. in my opinion - I
22982 never understood why not distributing the local-op mode... any rights
22983 should stay limited local - with or without propagating this mode. In my
22984 opinion this is a designed desync... (usually everyone tries to avoid
22985 and fight desyncs instead of designing them - strange isn't it?)
22986
22987 greets
22988 /medice
22989
22990
22991
22992 From chris at starglade.org Sat Aug 14 15:34:43 2004
22993 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
22994 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
22995 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
22996 In-Reply-To: <411E8C7D.5020209@gmx.at>
22997 References: <411E880B.5090205@starglade.org> <411E8C7D.5020209@gmx.at>
22998 Message-ID: <411E9383.2010104@starglade.org>
22999
23000 Medice wrote:
23001
23002 > well this is a flaw in unrealircd (a rather heavy one in my opinion) and
23003 > i don't think that any services-package out there should feel
23004 > responsible on react on other's flaws - maybe someone is coding a module
23005 > for this problem...
23006
23007 I know Bahamut has the +O mode too. On my network we don't have local
23008 opers, so I haven't tried getting around it. I am guessing it would
23009 suffer from the same problem, though.
23010
23011 The only way to deal with it would be for the local IRC server to kick
23012 out any non-opers when the modes were resynched - it shouldn't be up to
23013 services.
23014
23015 > the whole localop-stuff on unrealircd is a real sh.. in my opinion - I
23016 > never understood why not distributing the local-op mode... any rights
23017 > should stay limited local - with or without propagating this mode. In my
23018 > opinion this is a designed desync... (usually everyone tries to avoid
23019 > and fight desyncs instead of designing them - strange isn't it?)
23020
23021 This is how the local oper has been working, since opers were first
23022 added to the ircd. It's nothing new to Unreal.
23023
23024 --
23025 Chris Jenkinson
23026 chris@starglade.org
23027
23028
23029 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Aug 14 15:41:26 2004
23030 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
23031 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23032 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd
23033 netmerge
23034 Message-ID: <mailman.72.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23035
23036 Personally, i think it should at LEAST inform U:Lined servers, but thats no my decision.
23037
23038 The reason i posted this request, is because the UnrealIRCd team deem it un-nessecery to add this bugfix.. err.. i mean, feature :/
23039
23040 /****************************************
23041 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
23042 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
23043 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
23044 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
23045 ****************************************/
23046
23047
23048 /****************************************
23049 * From - Chris Jenkinson <chris@starglade.org>
23050 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23051 * Sent - 23:34:43 @ 2004-08-14
23052 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
23053 ****************************************/
23054
23055 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
23056
23057 >Medice wrote:
23058 >
23059 >> well this is a flaw in unrealircd (a rather heavy one in my opinion) and
23060 >> i don't think that any services-package out there should feel
23061 >> responsible on react on other's flaws - maybe someone is coding a module
23062 >> for this problem...
23063 >
23064 >I know Bahamut has the +O mode too. On my network we don't have local
23065 >opers, so I haven't tried getting around it. I am guessing it would
23066 >suffer from the same problem, though.
23067 >
23068 >The only way to deal with it would be for the local IRC server to kick
23069 >out any non-opers when the modes were resynched - it shouldn't be up to
23070 >services.
23071 >
23072 >> the whole localop-stuff on unrealircd is a real sh.. in my opinion - I
23073 >> never understood why not distributing the local-op mode... any rights
23074 >> should stay limited local - with or without propagating this mode. In my
23075 >> opinion this is a designed desync... (usually everyone tries to avoid
23076 >> and fight desyncs instead of designing them - strange isn't it?)
23077 >
23078 >This is how the local oper has been working, since opers were first
23079 >added to the ircd. It's nothing new to Unreal.
23080 >
23081 >--
23082 >Chris Jenkinson
23083 >chris@starglade.org
23084 >
23085 >------------------------------------------------------------------
23086 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23087 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23088 >.
23089
23090 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
23091
23092
23093
23094
23095 From chris at starglade.org Sat Aug 14 15:56:49 2004
23096 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
23097 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23098 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
23099 Message-ID: <411E98B1.8050307@starglade.org>
23100
23101 Craig McLure wrote:
23102
23103 > Personally, i think it should at LEAST inform U:Lined servers, but thats no my decision.
23104 >
23105 > The reason i posted this request, is because the UnrealIRCd team deem it un-nessecery to add this bugfix.. err.. i mean, feature :/
23106
23107 There is nothing services can do about this if UnrealIRCd doesn't send
23108 the local oper status changes (keyword: *local* ).
23109
23110 Chris
23111
23112 --
23113 Chris Jenkinson
23114 chris@starglade.org
23115
23116
23117 From medice at gmx.at Sat Aug 14 16:03:36 2004
23118 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
23119 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23120 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
23121 In-Reply-To: <411E9383.2010104@starglade.org>
23122 References: <411E880B.5090205@starglade.org> <411E8C7D.5020209@gmx.at>
23123 <411E9383.2010104@starglade.org>
23124 Message-ID: <411E9A48.6030104@gmx.at>
23125
23126 > This is how the local oper has been working, since opers were first
23127 > added to the ircd. It's nothing new to Unreal.
23128 >
23129 well i don't have on a bright knowledge of ircds and their history in
23130 detail, but I don't believe that this is good working that way...
23131 I personally don't like the idea of localops at the first place
23132 (different story), but if there is such a thing it should work smoothly
23133 - and if there are new developments which depends on previous
23134 installations , than it might be necessary to make some minor or major
23135 adjustments - even to old well-known stuff
23136 f.e. chanmode +O (which is rather new I think - considering history of
23137 IRC ;) ) blocking every non-oper, which means there must be a clear
23138 detection either a user is an oper or not - if there are cross-checks on
23139 remote servers if they are - or not, than they have to be informed
23140 correctly as well...
23141
23142 but at first this was not about the localop/chmode+O-problem but about
23143 netsplits and net(re)connects - also a rather well known thing which
23144 always caused problems on networks (desync/overtaking/etc...)
23145 I think an ircd should work smoothly on its own - services just offer
23146 additional features and are not responsible to clean up ircd's desyncs
23147
23148 As I mentioned on unreal-bug-tracker on this topic "the fact that
23149 something works as designed does not mean, that the design hasn't any
23150 flaws..."
23151
23152 greets
23153 /medice
23154
23155
23156 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Aug 14 17:07:16 2004
23157 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
23158 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23159 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in
23160 UnrealIRCd netmerge
23161 Message-ID: <E1Bw7f2-000Gdu-Vy@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
23162
23163 some way in the way unreal do +O allows localopers to join a +O channel though...
23164
23165 >Craig McLure wrote:
23166 >
23167 >> Personally, i think it should at LEAST inform U:Lined servers, but thats no my decision.
23168 >>
23169 >> The reason i posted this request, is because the UnrealIRCd team deem it un-nessecery to add this bugfix.. err.. i mean, feature :/
23170 >
23171 >There is nothing services can do about this if UnrealIRCd doesn't send
23172 >the local oper status changes (keyword: *local* ).
23173 >
23174 >Chris
23175 >
23176 >--
23177 >Chris Jenkinson
23178 >chris@starglade.org
23179 >
23180 >------------------------------------------------------------------
23181 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23182 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23183 >
23184
23185
23186
23187 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Aug 15 09:45:31 2004
23188 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
23189 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23190 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd netmerge
23191 In-Reply-To: <411e8562.61500@mail.achurch.org>
23192 Message-ID: <411eb305.16551@achurch.org>
23193
23194 >During a netmerge, if one side of the split has +O on a channel and the other doesnt, a non-oper can sit on the side without +O and when the net merges, force his way into the opers only channel. Its easily reproduced, and can be a quite annoying problem,
23195 > if enough people join while the net is split.
23196
23197 This is a bug, though I was pretty sure Services already watched for
23198 this. I'll take a look and fix whatever needs fixing.
23199
23200 >So, i'm officially requesting that this feature be added to Services. I'm not entirly sure how you will be able to identify a local oper, but i'm sure you will find a way.
23201
23202 I won't, because it's not possible (as others have pointed out).
23203 Local opers look no different from regular users to Services, and will be
23204 kicked out of +O channels--which is, IMO, proper, since +O channels are
23205 global and local opers should not be able to use their privileges beyond
23206 their own server.
23207
23208 --Andrew Church
23209 achurch@achurch.org
23210 http://achurch.org/
23211
23212
23213 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Aug 14 18:18:02 2004
23214 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
23215 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23216 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCd
23217 netmerge
23218 Message-ID: <E1Bw9hb-000GoA-Ae@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
23219
23220 as regards this bug, instead of doing something about it in the ircd, good old codemastr and friends have deleted this bug instead of listen to the overwhelming public show of support on this one.
23221
23222
23223 The following bug has been DELETED.
23224 ======================================================================
23225 http://bugs.unrealircd.org/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002022
23226 ======================================================================
23227 Reported By: brain2
23228 Assigned To:
23229 ======================================================================
23230 Project: unreal
23231 Bug ID: 2022
23232 Category: ircd
23233 Reproducibility: always
23234 Severity: minor
23235 Priority: normal
23236 Status: feedback
23237 ======================================================================
23238 Date Submitted: 2004-08-14 13:40 CDT
23239 Last Modified: 2004-08-14 21:36 CDT
23240 ======================================================================
23241 Summary: +O overrideable by non-opers in netmerge
23242
23243 I hope you can do something and help us by trying to make services work with this Andrew because it seems they arent and wont ever listen to what the users want, im just glad YOU are different and will at least try to get something working.
23244
23245 Thanks,
23246 Craig
23247
23248 >>During a netmerge, if one side of the split has +O on a channel and the other doesnt, a non-oper can sit on the side without +O and when the net merges, force his way into the opers only channel. Its easily reproduced, and can be a quite annoying problem,
23249 >> if enough people join while the net is split.
23250 >
23251 > This is a bug, though I was pretty sure Services already watched for
23252 >this. I'll take a look and fix whatever needs fixing.
23253 >
23254 >>So, i'm officially requesting that this feature be added to Services. I'm not entirly sure how you will be able to identify a local oper, but i'm sure you will find a way.
23255 >
23256 > I won't, because it's not possible (as others have pointed out).
23257 >Local opers look no different from regular users to Services, and will be
23258 >kicked out of +O channels--which is, IMO, proper, since +O channels are
23259 >global and local opers should not be able to use their privileges beyond
23260 >their own server.
23261 >
23262 > --Andrew Church
23263 > achurch@achurch.org
23264 > http://achurch.org/
23265 >
23266 >------------------------------------------------------------------
23267 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23268 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23269 >
23270
23271
23272
23273 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Aug 15 10:28:00 2004
23274 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
23275 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23276 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.38 released
23277 Message-ID: <411ebc75.42041@achurch.org>
23278
23279 Services 5.0.38 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
23280
23281 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
23282
23283 899b1ccd2317e46f9219887a9e0d2a77 ircservices-5.0.38.tar.gz
23284 e84d977391d56f2300f88f36d900fd6c ircservices-5.0.38.diff.gz
23285 7137eaaf19c23add0be91e07842a2663 ircservices-5.0.38-1.i386.rpm
23286 4f1b14867a856f2c82637054133430b7 ircservices_5.0.38-1_i386.deb
23287
23288 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
23289
23290 Changes in version 5.0.38
23291 -------------------------
23292 2004/08/15 Services now checks channel joins against the channel's
23293 current modes as well as mode locks, to prevent users
23294 from "riding" netsplits into privileged channels.
23295 Reported by Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
23296
23297 --Andrew Church
23298 achurch@achurch.org
23299 http://achurch.org/
23300
23301
23302 From robert_militar at hotmail.com Sat Aug 14 19:40:27 2004
23303 From: robert_militar at hotmail.com (Robert)
23304 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23305 Subject: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in UnrealIRCdnetmerge
23306 References: <E1Bw9hb-000GoA-Ae@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
23307 Message-ID: <BAY2-DAV5zbmqtgmdrp0003f661@hotmail.com>
23308
23309
23310 ----- Original Message -----
23311 From: "Craig Edwards" <brain@winbot.co.uk>
23312 To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>;
23313 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23314 Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 08:18 PM
23315 Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] +O overrideable by non-opers in
23316 UnrealIRCdnetmerge
23317
23318
23319 > as regards this bug, instead of doing something about it in the ircd, good
23320 old codemastr and friends have deleted this bug instead of listen to the
23321 overwhelming public show of support on this one.
23322 >
23323
23324 The best solution for this problem would be an ircd feature like what
23325 hybrid/ratbox has that doesn't allow the creation of new channels on
23326 netsplits. If the channel was empty they wouldn't be able to get in and if
23327 the channel did exist it would still be +O.
23328
23329
23330 From Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au Sun Aug 15 16:01:36 2004
23331 From: Robin.Burchell at oxley.nsw.edu.au (Robin Burchell)
23332 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23333 Subject: [IRCServices] +O and unrealircd.
23334 Message-ID: <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B6F@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
23335
23336 I feel I should point out that the +O (locops) usermode IS now actually distributed over the whole network, thanks to a bit of whinging I did, and public support from others.
23337
23338 (My whinge was about locops not being able to join operator-only channels)
23339
23340 Just my $0.02.
23341
23342 w00t, administrator irc.netronet.com
23343 Winse Developer. http://www.sf.net/projects/winse
23344 From edge_walker0 at yahoo.com Tue Aug 17 11:04:12 2004
23345 From: edge_walker0 at yahoo.com (Edge Walker)
23346 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23347 Subject: [IRCServices] +O and unrealircd.
23348 In-Reply-To: <61210DEC11A6624EBE04311BDB604A140C0B6F@oxleyserver.oxley.nsw.edu.au>
23349 Message-ID: <20040817180412.91492.qmail@web51305.mail.yahoo.com>
23350
23351 how does this efect Me
23352 Edge Walker aka White^Wolf
23353
23354 Robin Burchell <Robin.Burchell@oxley.nsw.edu.au> wrote:
23355 I feel I should point out that the +O (locops) usermode IS now actually distributed over the whole network, thanks to a bit of whinging I did, and public support from others.
23356
23357 (My whinge was about locops not being able to join operator-only channels)
23358
23359 Just my $0.02.
23360
23361 w00t, administrator irc.netronet.com
23362 Winse Developer. http://www.sf.net/projects/winse
23363 ------------------------------------------------------------------
23364 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23365 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23366
23367
23368 Edge Walker
23369
23370 __________________________________________________
23371 Do You Yahoo!?
23372 Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
23373 http://mail.yahoo.com
23374 -------------- next part --------------
23375 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
23376 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040817/0ab3134f/attachment.htm
23377 From msmith at acmecorp.org Tue Aug 17 16:23:54 2004
23378 From: msmith at acmecorp.org (Michael D. Smith)
23379 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23380 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on verbiage...
23381 In-Reply-To: <4118423f.21645@achurch.org>
23382 References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040809175842.02025790@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
23383 <4118423f.21645@achurch.org>
23384 Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20040817192312.0cfc4ba0@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
23385
23386 At 11:29 PM 8/9/2004, Andrew Church wrote:
23387
23388 > Messages used by Services are stored in the language files (lang/*.l);
23389 >however, there is no special message returned for the case you're asking
23390 >about, only a generic "access denied" message (so trying to change that
23391 >message would result in the changed message being given out in all cases
23392 >where the message was used). To accomplish what you want to do, you'll
23393 >have to modify the source directly.
23394
23395 Sorry for the late response, but thanks for the information!
23396
23397 Regards,
23398 Mike
23399
23400 Chief Network Administrator
23401 FleetChat IRC Services
23402
23403 "Net boy, net girl/Send your impulse 'round the world/
23404 Put your message in a modem/And throw it in the Cyber Sea"
23405 Lyrics "Virtruality" - Album "Test for Echo" - Rush, 1996 (Lee, Lifeson,
23406 Peart)
23407
23408
23409
23410
23411 From moontan at dmbroadband.com Thu Aug 19 16:11:02 2004
23412 From: moontan at dmbroadband.com (moontan@dmbroadband.com)
23413 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23414 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmant Fault help requested
23415 Message-ID: <20040819230831.M55882@deskmedia.com>
23416
23417 Upgraded to newest release now services segment faults. Any ideas
23418 on how to fix this problem?
23419
23420 [Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23421 [Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23422 [Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 30 (User defined signal 1) while
23423 shutting down
23424
23425
23426
23427 --
23428 Open WebMail Project (http://DMBroadband.com)
23429
23430
23431
23432 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Aug 20 09:01:42 2004
23433 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
23434 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23435 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmant Fault help requested
23436 In-Reply-To: <20040819230831.M55882@deskmedia.com>
23437 Message-ID: <41253f70.11063@achurch.org>
23438
23439 RTFM (FAQ Z.3)
23440
23441 --Andrew Church
23442 achurch@achurch.org
23443 http://achurch.org/
23444
23445 >Upgraded to newest release now services segment faults. Any ideas
23446 >on how to fix this problem?
23447 >
23448 >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23449 >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23450 >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 30 (User defined signal 1) while
23451 >shutting down
23452 >
23453 >
23454 >
23455 >--
23456 >Open WebMail Project (http://DMBroadband.com)
23457 >
23458 >
23459 >------------------------------------------------------------------
23460 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23461 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23462
23463
23464 From nick.martini at gmail.com Fri Aug 20 07:29:50 2004
23465 From: nick.martini at gmail.com (nick martini)
23466 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23467 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmant Fault help requested
23468 In-Reply-To: <41253f70.11063@achurch.org>
23469 References: <41253f70.11063@achurch.org>
23470 Message-ID: <ee1a43f40408200729174ecbb1@mail.gmail.com>
23471
23472 wow, so friendly.
23473
23474 On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:01:42 JST, Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org> wrote:
23475 > RTFM (FAQ Z.3)
23476 >
23477 > --Andrew Church
23478 > achurch@achurch.org
23479 > http://achurch.org/
23480 >
23481 >
23482 >
23483 > >Upgraded to newest release now services segment faults. Any ideas
23484 > >on how to fix this problem?
23485 > >
23486 > >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23487 > >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23488 > >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 30 (User defined signal 1) while
23489 > >shutting down
23490 > >
23491 > >
23492 > >
23493 > >--
23494 > >Open WebMail Project (http://DMBroadband.com)
23495 > >
23496 > >
23497 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
23498 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23499 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23500 >
23501 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
23502 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23503 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23504 >
23505
23506
23507 From phan70m at gmail.com Fri Aug 20 08:43:08 2004
23508 From: phan70m at gmail.com (PHANTOm)
23509 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23510 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmant Fault help requested
23511 In-Reply-To: <ee1a43f40408200729174ecbb1@mail.gmail.com>
23512 References: <41253f70.11063@achurch.org>
23513 <ee1a43f40408200729174ecbb1@mail.gmail.com>
23514 Message-ID: <d50f59a0040820084345fe3ff3@mail.gmail.com>
23515
23516 will the stupidity ever stop?
23517 docs are made to be read!
23518
23519 On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:29:50 -0400, nick martini <nick.martini@gmail.com> wrote:
23520 > wow, so friendly.
23521 >
23522 >
23523 >
23524 > On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:01:42 JST, Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org> wrote:
23525 > > RTFM (FAQ Z.3)
23526 > >
23527 > > --Andrew Church
23528 > > achurch@achurch.org
23529 > > http://achurch.org/
23530 > >
23531 > >
23532 > >
23533 > > >Upgraded to newest release now services segment faults. Any ideas
23534 > > >on how to fix this problem?
23535 > > >
23536 > > >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23537 > > >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23538 > > >[Aug 19 18:31:20 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 30 (User defined signal 1) while
23539 > > >shutting down
23540 > > >
23541 > > >
23542 > > >
23543 > > >--
23544 > > >Open WebMail Project (http://DMBroadband.com)
23545 > > >
23546 > > >
23547 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
23548 > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23549 > > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23550 > >
23551 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
23552 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23553 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23554 > >
23555 >
23556 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
23557 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23558 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23559 >
23560
23561
23562 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Aug 20 10:30:23 2004
23563 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
23564 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23565 Subject: [IRCServices] Segmant Fault help requested
23566 Message-ID: <E1ByEAE-0005OK-RP@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
23567
23568 no, it wont stop, while there is a source of people to bug before reading the help! :-)
23569
23570 i noticed that unreal's support channel has a system whereby you have to have read the faq to get voiced in the support channel, maybe these mailing lists should have a similar feature at signup?
23571
23572
23573 Thanks,
23574 Brain
23575
23576 >will the stupidity ever stop?
23577 >docs are made to be read!
23578 >
23579 >On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:29:50 -0400, nick martini <nick.martini@gmail.com> wrote:
23580 >> wow, so friendly.
23581 >>
23582 >>
23583 >>
23584 >> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:01:42 JST, Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org> wrote:
23585 >> > RTFM (FAQ Z.3)
23586 >> >
23587
23588
23589
23590
23591 From cpuman2000 at hotmail.com Fri Aug 27 16:04:51 2004
23592 From: cpuman2000 at hotmail.com (CPUMAN)
23593 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23594 Subject: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23595 Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV13e1MRpANH000089ee@hotmail.com>
23596
23597 I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird occurrences on the exception list... like blank entries...
23598
23599 -OperServ- 7. (by CPUMAN on Aug 27 2004; does not expire)
23600 -
23601 -OperServ- Limit: 0 - Yura
23602
23603 and I also got corrupted entries as well...
23604
23605 -OperServ- 7. ?b\14\b\14?\14@.ov.nl.home.nl (by CPUMAN on Jan 01 2004; does not expire)
23606 -
23607 -OperServ- Limit: 5 - 142.166.*
23608
23609 Finally services just crashed...
23610
23611 [16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23612 [16:47:10] Received SQUIT services.serenia.net from services.serenia.net[127.0.0.1] (Services terminating: Segmentation fault)
23613
23614 and the logs show this...
23615
23616 [Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23617 [Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23618 [Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault) while shutting down
23619
23620 As for other information we're running Unreal 3.2.1 with the latest version of services (5.0.38).
23621
23622 If there is any other information I can provide please let me know.
23623
23624 CPUMAN
23625 Network Administrator
23626 Serenia IRC Network
23627 chat.serenia.net
23628 -------------- next part --------------
23629 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
23630 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040827/4e23cfab/attachment.html
23631 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Aug 27 20:08:32 2004
23632 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
23633 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23634 Subject: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23635 Message-ID: <mailman.73.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23636
23637 Firstly, please don't send HTML emails to this list. Thanks.
23638
23639 Anyway, this seems to be odd behaviour indeed, looks like a buffer overrun somewhere.
23640 My official responce would be: "RTFM FAQ Z.3" Which describes fully how to report bugs.
23641
23642 On the other hand, has this version of services been modified in any way? the appearance of the - charactor in every exception makes it appear so, if it has been modified, dont expect help :)
23643
23644 /****************************************
23645 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
23646 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
23647 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
23648 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
23649 ****************************************/
23650
23651
23652 /****************************************
23653 * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
23654 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23655 * Sent - 00:04:51 @ 2004-08-28
23656 * Subject - [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23657 ****************************************/
23658
23659 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
23660
23661 >I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird occurrences on the exception list... like blank entries...
23662 >
23663 >-OperServ- 7. (by CPUMAN on Aug 27 2004; does not expire)
23664 >-
23665 >-OperServ- Limit: 0 - Yura
23666 >
23667 >and I also got corrupted entries as well...
23668 >
23669 >-OperServ- 7. ?b\14\b\14?\14@.ov.nl.home.nl (by CPUMAN on Jan 01 2004; does not expire)
23670 >-
23671 >-OperServ- Limit: 5 - 142.166.*
23672 >
23673 >Finally services just crashed...
23674 >
23675 >[16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23676 >[16:47:10] Received SQUIT services.serenia.net from services.serenia.net[127.0.0.1] (Services terminating: Segmentation fault)
23677 >
23678 >and the logs show this...
23679 >
23680 >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23681 >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23682 >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault) while shutting down
23683 >
23684 >As for other information we're running Unreal 3.2.1 with the latest version of services (5.0.38).
23685 >
23686 >If there is any other information I can provide please let me know.
23687 >
23688 >CPUMAN
23689 >Network Administrator
23690 >Serenia IRC Network
23691 >chat.serenia.net
23692 >------------------------------------------------------------------
23693 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23694 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23695 >
23696
23697 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
23698
23699
23700
23701
23702 From cpuman2000 at hotmail.com Fri Aug 27 22:59:26 2004
23703 From: cpuman2000 at hotmail.com (CPUMAN)
23704 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23705 Subject: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23706 References: <MC11-F19dutTzDnaax100015b5f@mc11-f19.hotmail.com>
23707 Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV9IEAOeIiGX00000016@hotmail.com>
23708
23709 Wow that was an extremely rude reply.
23710
23711 First off other then neglecting to include the O/S info I gave all the
23712 information the manual asked. Which it's running Slackware 10 with kernel
23713 2.6.7 on an AthlonXP 2500+ with 256MB of RAM.
23714
23715 Second off it's a stock version of services. The character '-' is always
23716 placed before the exception reason when you issue the view command (versus
23717 the list command). I'd highly recommend you give the '/operserv exception
23718 view' command a try.
23719
23720 Finally there was no back trace. I'm currently trying recreate the crash,
23721 but it may very well have been due several other factors to, include the
23722 length of time services had been up and running as it appears to me that
23723 something was handled incorrectly with the buffer, which could of been a
23724 progressive problem. One other piece of information that is worth adding is
23725 it only happened with the issue of the 'exception del num' command, but
23726 appeared to be fine with the 'exception del host' command... as soon as I
23727 can recreate the crash I'll gladly provide the debug log.
23728
23729 CPUMAN
23730 Network Administrator
23731 Serenia IRC Network
23732 chat.serenia.net
23733
23734 ----- Original Message -----
23735 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
23736 To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23737 Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:08 PM
23738 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23739
23740
23741 > Firstly, please don't send HTML emails to this list. Thanks.
23742 >
23743 > Anyway, this seems to be odd behaviour indeed, looks like a buffer overrun
23744 somewhere.
23745 > My official responce would be: "RTFM FAQ Z.3" Which describes fully how
23746 to report bugs.
23747 >
23748 > On the other hand, has this version of services been modified in any way?
23749 the appearance of the - charactor in every exception makes it appear so, if
23750 it has been modified, dont expect help :)
23751 >
23752 > /****************************************
23753 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
23754 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
23755 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
23756 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
23757 > ****************************************/
23758 >
23759 >
23760 > /****************************************
23761 > * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
23762 > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
23763 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23764 > * Sent - 00:04:51 @ 2004-08-28
23765 > * Subject - [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23766 > ****************************************/
23767 >
23768 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
23769 >
23770 > >I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird occurrences
23771 on the exception list... like blank entries...
23772 > >
23773 > >-OperServ- 7. (by CPUMAN on Aug 27 2004; does not expire)
23774 > >-
23775 > >-OperServ- Limit: 0 - Yura
23776 > >
23777 > >and I also got corrupted entries as well...
23778 > >
23779 > >-OperServ- 7. ?b\14\b\14?\14@.ov.nl.home.nl (by CPUMAN on Jan 01 2004; does
23780 not expire)
23781 > >-
23782 > >-OperServ- Limit: 5 - 142.166.*
23783 > >
23784 > >Finally services just crashed...
23785 > >
23786 > >[16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23787 > >[16:47:10] Received SQUIT services.serenia.net from
23788 services.serenia.net[127.0.0.1] (Services terminating: Segmentation fault)
23789 > >
23790 > >and the logs show this...
23791 > >
23792 > >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23793 > >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23794 > >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault) while
23795 shutting down
23796 > >
23797 > >As for other information we're running Unreal 3.2.1 with the latest
23798 version of services (5.0.38).
23799 > >
23800 > >If there is any other information I can provide please let me know.
23801 > >
23802 > >CPUMAN
23803 > >Network Administrator
23804 > >Serenia IRC Network
23805 > >chat.serenia.net
23806 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
23807 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23808 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23809 > >
23810 >
23811 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
23812 >
23813 >
23814 >
23815 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
23816 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23817 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23818 >
23819
23820
23821 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Aug 28 01:39:02 2004
23822 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
23823 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23824 Subject: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23825 Message-ID: <mailman.74.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23826
23827 I appologise for the rudeness of my reply last night, there was no need for it, my IRC network was DDoSed last night, and 3 of our servers went down.. but you dont need my life story.
23828
23829 You are right, there is a - in all exception lists, it just seemed odd that i used /os exception list.
23830
23831 If you can re-create the bug, would it be possible to see if /os exception list returns the same corrupted results?
23832
23833 Also, what version of GCC are you running? It may be a compiler issue.
23834
23835 /****************************************
23836 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
23837 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
23838 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
23839 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
23840 ****************************************/
23841
23842
23843 /****************************************
23844 * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
23845 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23846 * Sent - 06:59:26 @ 2004-08-28
23847 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23848 ****************************************/
23849
23850 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
23851
23852 >Wow that was an extremely rude reply.
23853 >
23854 >First off other then neglecting to include the O/S info I gave all the
23855 >information the manual asked. Which it's running Slackware 10 with kernel
23856 >2.6.7 on an AthlonXP 2500+ with 256MB of RAM.
23857 >
23858 >Second off it's a stock version of services. The character '-' is always
23859 >placed before the exception reason when you issue the view command (versus
23860 >the list command). I'd highly recommend you give the '/operserv exception
23861 >view' command a try.
23862 >
23863 >Finally there was no back trace. I'm currently trying recreate the crash,
23864 >but it may very well have been due several other factors to, include the
23865 >length of time services had been up and running as it appears to me that
23866 >something was handled incorrectly with the buffer, which could of been a
23867 >progressive problem. One other piece of information that is worth adding is
23868 >it only happened with the issue of the 'exception del num' command, but
23869 >appeared to be fine with the 'exception del host' command... as soon as I
23870 >can recreate the crash I'll gladly provide the debug log.
23871 >
23872 >CPUMAN
23873 >Network Administrator
23874 >Serenia IRC Network
23875 >chat.serenia.net
23876 >
23877 >----- Original Message -----
23878 >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
23879 >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23880 >Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:08 PM
23881 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23882 >
23883 >
23884 >> Firstly, please don't send HTML emails to this list. Thanks.
23885 >>
23886 >> Anyway, this seems to be odd behaviour indeed, looks like a buffer overrun
23887 >somewhere.
23888 >> My official responce would be: "RTFM FAQ Z.3" Which describes fully how
23889 >to report bugs.
23890 >>
23891 >> On the other hand, has this version of services been modified in any way?
23892 >the appearance of the - charactor in every exception makes it appear so, if
23893 >it has been modified, dont expect help :)
23894 >>
23895 >> /****************************************
23896 >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
23897 >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
23898 >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
23899 >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
23900 >> ****************************************/
23901 >>
23902 >>
23903 >> /****************************************
23904 >> * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
23905 >> * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
23906 ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23907 >> * Sent - 00:04:51 @ 2004-08-28
23908 >> * Subject - [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23909 >> ****************************************/
23910 >>
23911 >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
23912 >>
23913 >> >I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird occurrences
23914 >on the exception list... like blank entries...
23915 >> >
23916 >> >-OperServ- 7. (by CPUMAN on Aug 27 2004; does not expire)
23917 >> >-
23918 >> >-OperServ- Limit: 0 - Yura
23919 >> >
23920 >> >and I also got corrupted entries as well...
23921 >> >
23922 >> >-OperServ- 7. ?b\14\b\14?\14@.ov.nl.home.nl (by CPUMAN on Jan 01 2004; does
23923 >not expire)
23924 >> >-
23925 >> >-OperServ- Limit: 5 - 142.166.*
23926 >> >
23927 >> >Finally services just crashed...
23928 >> >
23929 >> >[16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23930 >> >[16:47:10] Received SQUIT services.serenia.net from
23931 >services.serenia.net[127.0.0.1] (Services terminating: Segmentation fault)
23932 >> >
23933 >> >and the logs show this...
23934 >> >
23935 >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
23936 >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
23937 >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault) while
23938 >shutting down
23939 >> >
23940 >> >As for other information we're running Unreal 3.2.1 with the latest
23941 >version of services (5.0.38).
23942 >> >
23943 >> >If there is any other information I can provide please let me know.
23944 >> >
23945 >> >CPUMAN
23946 >> >Network Administrator
23947 >> >Serenia IRC Network
23948 >> >chat.serenia.net
23949 >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
23950 >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23951 >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23952 >> >
23953 >>
23954 >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
23955 >>
23956 >>
23957 >>
23958 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
23959 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23960 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23961 >>
23962 >
23963 >------------------------------------------------------------------
23964 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
23965 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
23966
23967 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
23968
23969
23970
23971
23972 From cpuman2000 at hotmail.com Sat Aug 28 08:40:16 2004
23973 From: cpuman2000 at hotmail.com (CPUMAN)
23974 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
23975 Subject: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23976 References: <MC11-F27f7w6J7JHj4D0002d650@mc11-f27.hotmail.com>
23977 Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV9s3JcXu98s00005bb3@hotmail.com>
23978
23979 That's understandable, my network has suffered through several DDoS's.
23980
23981 Anyway it's GCC 3.3.4.
23982
23983 I'm currently using a test server to try and recreate the crash as I can't
23984 risk them crashing on my main network again. If I can get it to happen
23985 again I'll post the debug log.
23986
23987 CPUMAN
23988 Network Administrator
23989 Serenia IRC Network
23990 chat.serenia.net
23991
23992 ----- Original Message -----
23993 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
23994 To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
23995 Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:39 AM
23996 Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
23997
23998
23999 > I appologise for the rudeness of my reply last night, there was no need
24000 for it, my IRC network was DDoSed last night, and 3 of our servers went
24001 down.. but you dont need my life story.
24002 >
24003 > You are right, there is a - in all exception lists, it just seemed odd
24004 that i used /os exception list.
24005 >
24006 > If you can re-create the bug, would it be possible to see if /os exception
24007 list returns the same corrupted results?
24008 >
24009 > Also, what version of GCC are you running? It may be a compiler issue.
24010 >
24011 > /****************************************
24012 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24013 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24014 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24015 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24016 > ****************************************/
24017 >
24018 >
24019 > /****************************************
24020 > * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24021 > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
24022 <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24023 > * Sent - 06:59:26 @ 2004-08-28
24024 > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24025 > ****************************************/
24026 >
24027 > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
24028 >
24029 > >Wow that was an extremely rude reply.
24030 > >
24031 > >First off other then neglecting to include the O/S info I gave all the
24032 > >information the manual asked. Which it's running Slackware 10 with kernel
24033 > >2.6.7 on an AthlonXP 2500+ with 256MB of RAM.
24034 > >
24035 > >Second off it's a stock version of services. The character '-' is always
24036 > >placed before the exception reason when you issue the view command
24037 (versus
24038 > >the list command). I'd highly recommend you give the '/operserv
24039 exception
24040 > >view' command a try.
24041 > >
24042 > >Finally there was no back trace. I'm currently trying recreate the crash,
24043 > >but it may very well have been due several other factors to, include the
24044 > >length of time services had been up and running as it appears to me that
24045 > >something was handled incorrectly with the buffer, which could of been a
24046 > >progressive problem. One other piece of information that is worth adding
24047 is
24048 > >it only happened with the issue of the 'exception del num' command, but
24049 > >appeared to be fine with the 'exception del host' command... as soon as I
24050 > >can recreate the crash I'll gladly provide the debug log.
24051 > >
24052 > >CPUMAN
24053 > >Network Administrator
24054 > >Serenia IRC Network
24055 > >chat.serenia.net
24056 > >
24057 > >----- Original Message -----
24058 > >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
24059 > >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24060 > >Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:08 PM
24061 > >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24062 > >
24063 > >
24064 > >> Firstly, please don't send HTML emails to this list. Thanks.
24065 > >>
24066 > >> Anyway, this seems to be odd behaviour indeed, looks like a buffer
24067 overrun
24068 > >somewhere.
24069 > >> My official responce would be: "RTFM FAQ Z.3" Which describes fully
24070 how
24071 > >to report bugs.
24072 > >>
24073 > >> On the other hand, has this version of services been modified in any
24074 way?
24075 > >the appearance of the - charactor in every exception makes it appear so,
24076 if
24077 > >it has been modified, dont expect help :)
24078 > >>
24079 > >> /****************************************
24080 > >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24081 > >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24082 > >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24083 > >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24084 > >> ****************************************/
24085 > >>
24086 > >>
24087 > >> /****************************************
24088 > >> * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24089 > >> * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
24090 > ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24091 > >> * Sent - 00:04:51 @ 2004-08-28
24092 > >> * Subject - [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24093 > >> ****************************************/
24094 > >>
24095 > >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
24096 > >>
24097 > >> >I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird
24098 occurrences
24099 > >on the exception list... like blank entries...
24100 > >> >
24101 > >> >-OperServ- 7. (by CPUMAN on Aug 27 2004; does not expire)
24102 > >> >-
24103 > >> >-OperServ- Limit: 0 - Yura
24104 > >> >
24105 > >> >and I also got corrupted entries as well...
24106 > >> >
24107 > >> >-OperServ- 7. ?b\14\b\14?\14@.ov.nl.home.nl (by CPUMAN on Jan 01 2004;
24108 does
24109 > >not expire)
24110 > >> >-
24111 > >> >-OperServ- Limit: 5 - 142.166.*
24112 > >> >
24113 > >> >Finally services just crashed...
24114 > >> >
24115 > >> >[16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
24116 > >> >[16:47:10] Received SQUIT services.serenia.net from
24117 > >services.serenia.net[127.0.0.1] (Services terminating: Segmentation
24118 fault)
24119 > >> >
24120 > >> >and the logs show this...
24121 > >> >
24122 > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
24123 > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
24124 > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
24125 while
24126 > >shutting down
24127 > >> >
24128 > >> >As for other information we're running Unreal 3.2.1 with the latest
24129 > >version of services (5.0.38).
24130 > >> >
24131 > >> >If there is any other information I can provide please let me know.
24132 > >> >
24133 > >> >CPUMAN
24134 > >> >Network Administrator
24135 > >> >Serenia IRC Network
24136 > >> >chat.serenia.net
24137 > >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
24138 > >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24139 > >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24140 > >> >
24141 > >>
24142 > >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
24143 > >>
24144 > >>
24145 > >>
24146 > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
24147 > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24148 > >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24149 > >>
24150 > >
24151 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
24152 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24153 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24154 >
24155 > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
24156 >
24157 >
24158 >
24159 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
24160 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24161 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24162 >
24163
24164
24165 From moontan at dmbroadband.com Sun Aug 29 06:08:20 2004
24166 From: moontan at dmbroadband.com (moontan@dmbroadband.com)
24167 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24168 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: IRCServices Digest, Vol 20, Issue 14
24169 In-Reply-To: <20040829095631.9B9E371A1B@dm.deskmedia.com>
24170 References: <20040829095631.9B9E371A1B@dm.deskmedia.com>
24171 Message-ID: <20040829130648.M56131@deskmedia.com>
24172
24173
24174
24175 I had the same problem. Will not back trace, but I resolved the problem. I
24176 switched to anope services, and problem went away
24177
24178
24179 ---------- Original Message -----------
24180 From: ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
24181 To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
24182 Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:56:31 -0500 (CDT)
24183 Subject: IRCServices Digest, Vol 20, Issue 14
24184
24185 > Send IRCServices mailing list submissions to
24186 > ircservices@ircservices.za.net
24187 >
24188 > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
24189 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24190 > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
24191 > ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
24192 >
24193 > You can reach the person managing the list at
24194 > ircservices-owner@ircservices.za.net
24195 >
24196 > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
24197 > than "Re: Contents of IRCServices digest..."
24198 >
24199 > Today's Topics:
24200 >
24201 > 1. Re: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug (CPUMAN)
24202 >
24203 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
24204 >
24205 > Message: 1
24206 > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 09:40:16 -0600
24207 > From: "CPUMAN" <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24208 > Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24209 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
24210 > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24211 > Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV9s3JcXu98s00005bb3@hotmail.com>
24212 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
24213 >
24214 > That's understandable, my network has suffered through several DDoS's.
24215 >
24216 > Anyway it's GCC 3.3.4.
24217 >
24218 > I'm currently using a test server to try and recreate the crash as
24219 > I can't risk them crashing on my main network again. If I can get
24220 > it to happen again I'll post the debug log.
24221 >
24222 > CPUMAN
24223 > Network Administrator
24224 > Serenia IRC Network
24225 > chat.serenia.net
24226 >
24227 > ----- Original Message -----
24228 > From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
24229 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24230 > Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:39 AM
24231 > Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24232 >
24233 > > I appologise for the rudeness of my reply last night, there was no need
24234 > for it, my IRC network was DDoSed last night, and 3 of our servers went
24235 > down.. but you dont need my life story.
24236 > >
24237 > > You are right, there is a - in all exception lists, it just seemed odd
24238 > that i used /os exception list.
24239 > >
24240 > > If you can re-create the bug, would it be possible to see if /os
24241 exception
24242 > list returns the same corrupted results?
24243 > >
24244 > > Also, what version of GCC are you running? It may be a compiler issue.
24245 > >
24246 > > /****************************************
24247 > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24248 > > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24249 > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24250 > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24251 > > ****************************************/
24252 > >
24253 > >
24254 > > /****************************************
24255 > > * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24256 > > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
24257 > <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24258 > > * Sent - 06:59:26 @ 2004-08-28
24259 > > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24260 > > ****************************************/
24261 > >
24262 > > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
24263 > >
24264 > > >Wow that was an extremely rude reply.
24265 > > >
24266 > > >First off other then neglecting to include the O/S info I gave all the
24267 > > >information the manual asked. Which it's running Slackware 10 with
24268 kernel
24269 > > >2.6.7 on an AthlonXP 2500+ with 256MB of RAM.
24270 > > >
24271 > > >Second off it's a stock version of services. The character '-' is always
24272 > > >placed before the exception reason when you issue the view command
24273 > (versus
24274 > > >the list command). I'd highly recommend you give the '/operserv
24275 > exception
24276 > > >view' command a try.
24277 > > >
24278 > > >Finally there was no back trace. I'm currently trying recreate the
24279 crash,
24280 > > >but it may very well have been due several other factors to, include the
24281 > > >length of time services had been up and running as it appears to me that
24282 > > >something was handled incorrectly with the buffer, which could of been a
24283 > > >progressive problem. One other piece of information that is worth
24284 adding
24285 > is
24286 > > >it only happened with the issue of the 'exception del num' command, but
24287 > > >appeared to be fine with the 'exception del host' command... as soon as
24288 I
24289 > > >can recreate the crash I'll gladly provide the debug log.
24290 > > >
24291 > > >CPUMAN
24292 > > >Network Administrator
24293 > > >Serenia IRC Network
24294 > > >chat.serenia.net
24295 > > >
24296 > > >----- Original Message -----
24297 > > >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
24298 > > >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24299 > > >Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:08 PM
24300 > > >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24301 > > >
24302 > > >
24303 > > >> Firstly, please don't send HTML emails to this list. Thanks.
24304 > > >>
24305 > > >> Anyway, this seems to be odd behaviour indeed, looks like a buffer
24306 > overrun
24307 > > >somewhere.
24308 > > >> My official responce would be: "RTFM FAQ Z.3" Which describes fully
24309 > how
24310 > > >to report bugs.
24311 > > >>
24312 > > >> On the other hand, has this version of services been modified in any
24313 > way?
24314 > > >the appearance of the - charactor in every exception makes it appear so,
24315 > if
24316 > > >it has been modified, dont expect help :)
24317 > > >>
24318 > > >> /****************************************
24319 > > >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24320 > > >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24321 > > >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24322 > > >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24323 > > >> ****************************************/
24324 > > >>
24325 > > >>
24326 > > >> /****************************************
24327 > > >> * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24328 > > >> * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
24329 > > ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24330 > > >> * Sent - 00:04:51 @ 2004-08-28
24331 > > >> * Subject - [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24332 > > >> ****************************************/
24333 > > >>
24334 > > >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
24335 > > >>
24336 > > >> >I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird
24337 > occurrences
24338 > > >on the exception list... like blank entries...
24339 > > >> >
24340 > > >> >-OperServ- 7. (by CPUMAN on Aug 27 2004; does not expire)
24341 > > >> >-
24342 > > >> >-OperServ- Limit: 0 - Yura
24343 > > >> >
24344 > > >> >and I also got corrupted entries as well...
24345 > > >> >
24346 > > >> >-OperServ- 7. ?b\14\b\14?\14@.ov.nl.home.nl (by CPUMAN on Jan 01 2004;
24347 > does
24348 > > >not expire)
24349 > > >> >-
24350 > > >> >-OperServ- Limit: 5 - 142.166.*
24351 > > >> >
24352 > > >> >Finally services just crashed...
24353 > > >> >
24354 > > >> >[16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
24355 > > >> >[16:47:10] Received SQUIT services.serenia.net from
24356 > > >services.serenia.net[127.0.0.1] (Services terminating: Segmentation
24357 > fault)
24358 > > >> >
24359 > > >> >and the logs show this...
24360 > > >> >
24361 > > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
24362 > > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
24363 > > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
24364 > while
24365 > > >shutting down
24366 > > >> >
24367 > > >> >As for other information we're running Unreal 3.2.1 with the latest
24368 > > >version of services (5.0.38).
24369 > > >> >
24370 > > >> >If there is any other information I can provide please let me know.
24371 > > >> >
24372 > > >> >CPUMAN
24373 > > >> >Network Administrator
24374 > > >> >Serenia IRC Network
24375 > > >> >chat.serenia.net
24376 > > >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
24377 > > >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24378 > > >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24379 > > >> >
24380 > > >>
24381 > > >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
24382 > > >>
24383 > > >>
24384 > > >>
24385 > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
24386 > > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24387 > > >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24388 > > >>
24389 > > >
24390 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
24391 > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24392 > > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24393 > >
24394 > > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
24395 > >
24396 > >
24397 > >
24398 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
24399 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24400 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24401 > >
24402 >
24403 > ------------------------------
24404 >
24405 > _______________________________________________
24406 > IRCServices mailing list
24407 > IRCServices@ircservices.za.net
24408 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24409 >
24410 > End of IRCServices Digest, Vol 20, Issue 14
24411 > *******************************************
24412 ------- End of Original Message -------
24413
24414
24415
24416 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun Aug 29 13:10:08 2004
24417 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
24418 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24419 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: IRCServices Digest, Vol 20, Issue 14
24420 Message-ID: <mailman.75.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24421
24422 Well, if you had gone into more detail and RTFM on how to report segfaults, then maybe you would have been helpped. As Andy said "RTFM (FAQ Z.3)". Just saying 'It Crashed' is stupid. Not even telling us HOW it crashed, apart from a log entry saying 'Services is crashing now'.
24423
24424 If you cant read the manual, then thats your problem. Good luck with Anope. Have a Nice day, and please leave us alone.
24425
24426 /****************************************
24427 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24428 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24429 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24430 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24431 ****************************************/
24432
24433
24434 /****************************************
24435 * From - moontan <moontan@dmbroadband.com>
24436 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24437 * Sent - 14:08:20 @ 2004-08-29
24438 * Subject - [IRCServices] Re: IRCServices Digest, Vol 20, Issue 14
24439 ****************************************/
24440
24441 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
24442
24443 >
24444 >
24445 >I had the same problem. Will not back trace, but I resolved the problem. I
24446 >switched to anope services, and problem went away
24447 >
24448 >
24449 >---------- Original Message -----------
24450 >From: ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
24451 >To: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
24452 >Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:56:31 -0500 (CDT)
24453 >Subject: IRCServices Digest, Vol 20, Issue 14
24454 >
24455 >> Send IRCServices mailing list submissions to
24456 >> ircservices@ircservices.za.net
24457 >>
24458 >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
24459 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24460 >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
24461 >> ircservices-request@ircservices.za.net
24462 >>
24463 >> You can reach the person managing the list at
24464 >> ircservices-owner@ircservices.za.net
24465 >>
24466 >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
24467 >> than "Re: Contents of IRCServices digest..."
24468 >>
24469 >> Today's Topics:
24470 >>
24471 >> 1. Re: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug (CPUMAN)
24472 >>
24473 >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
24474 >>
24475 >> Message: 1
24476 >> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 09:40:16 -0600
24477 >> From: "CPUMAN" <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24478 >> Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24479 >> To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
24480 >> <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24481 >> Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV9s3JcXu98s00005bb3@hotmail.com>
24482 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
24483 >>
24484 >> That's understandable, my network has suffered through several DDoS's.
24485 >>
24486 >> Anyway it's GCC 3.3.4.
24487 >>
24488 >> I'm currently using a test server to try and recreate the crash as
24489 >> I can't risk them crashing on my main network again. If I can get
24490 >> it to happen again I'll post the debug log.
24491 >>
24492 >> CPUMAN
24493 >> Network Administrator
24494 >> Serenia IRC Network
24495 >> chat.serenia.net
24496 >>
24497 >> ----- Original Message -----
24498 >> From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
24499 >> To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24500 >> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:39 AM
24501 >> Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24502 >>
24503 >> > I appologise for the rudeness of my reply last night, there was no need
24504 >> for it, my IRC network was DDoSed last night, and 3 of our servers went
24505 >> down.. but you dont need my life story.
24506 >> >
24507 >> > You are right, there is a - in all exception lists, it just seemed odd
24508 >> that i used /os exception list.
24509 >> >
24510 >> > If you can re-create the bug, would it be possible to see if /os
24511 >exception
24512 >> list returns the same corrupted results?
24513 >> >
24514 >> > Also, what version of GCC are you running? It may be a compiler issue.
24515 >> >
24516 >> > /****************************************
24517 >> > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24518 >> > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24519 >> > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24520 >> > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24521 >> > ****************************************/
24522 >> >
24523 >> >
24524 >> > /****************************************
24525 >> > * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24526 >> > * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
24527 >> <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24528 >> > * Sent - 06:59:26 @ 2004-08-28
24529 >> > * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24530 >> > ****************************************/
24531 >> >
24532 >> > /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
24533 >> >
24534 >> > >Wow that was an extremely rude reply.
24535 >> > >
24536 >> > >First off other then neglecting to include the O/S info I gave all the
24537 >> > >information the manual asked. Which it's running Slackware 10 with
24538 >kernel
24539 >> > >2.6.7 on an AthlonXP 2500+ with 256MB of RAM.
24540 >> > >
24541 >> > >Second off it's a stock version of services. The character '-' is always
24542 >> > >placed before the exception reason when you issue the view command
24543 >> (versus
24544 >> > >the list command). I'd highly recommend you give the '/operserv
24545 >> exception
24546 >> > >view' command a try.
24547 >> > >
24548 >> > >Finally there was no back trace. I'm currently trying recreate the
24549 >crash,
24550 >> > >but it may very well have been due several other factors to, include the
24551 >> > >length of time services had been up and running as it appears to me that
24552 >> > >something was handled incorrectly with the buffer, which could of been a
24553 >> > >progressive problem. One other piece of information that is worth
24554 >adding
24555 >> is
24556 >> > >it only happened with the issue of the 'exception del num' command, but
24557 >> > >appeared to be fine with the 'exception del host' command... as soon as
24558 >I
24559 >> > >can recreate the crash I'll gladly provide the debug log.
24560 >> > >
24561 >> > >CPUMAN
24562 >> > >Network Administrator
24563 >> > >Serenia IRC Network
24564 >> > >chat.serenia.net
24565 >> > >
24566 >> > >----- Original Message -----
24567 >> > >From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
24568 >> > >To: "IRC Services General Mailing Lis" <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24569 >> > >Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:08 PM
24570 >> > >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24571 >> > >
24572 >> > >
24573 >> > >> Firstly, please don't send HTML emails to this list. Thanks.
24574 >> > >>
24575 >> > >> Anyway, this seems to be odd behaviour indeed, looks like a buffer
24576 >> overrun
24577 >> > >somewhere.
24578 >> > >> My official responce would be: "RTFM FAQ Z.3" Which describes fully
24579 >> how
24580 >> > >to report bugs.
24581 >> > >>
24582 >> > >> On the other hand, has this version of services been modified in any
24583 >> way?
24584 >> > >the appearance of the - charactor in every exception makes it appear so,
24585 >> if
24586 >> > >it has been modified, dont expect help :)
24587 >> > >>
24588 >> > >> /****************************************
24589 >> > >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24590 >> > >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24591 >> > >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24592 >> > >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24593 >> > >> ****************************************/
24594 >> > >>
24595 >> > >>
24596 >> > >> /****************************************
24597 >> > >> * From - CPUMAN <cpuman2000@hotmail.com>
24598 >> > >> * To - IRC Services General Mailing List
24599 >> > ><ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24600 >> > >> * Sent - 00:04:51 @ 2004-08-28
24601 >> > >> * Subject - [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24602 >> > >> ****************************************/
24603 >> > >>
24604 >> > >> /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
24605 >> > >>
24606 >> > >> >I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird
24607 >> occurrences
24608 >> > >on the exception list... like blank entries...
24609 >> > >> >
24610 >> > >> >-OperServ- 7. (by CPUMAN on Aug 27 2004; does not expire)
24611 >> > >> >-
24612 >> > >> >-OperServ- Limit: 0 - Yura
24613 >> > >> >
24614 >> > >> >and I also got corrupted entries as well...
24615 >> > >> >
24616 >> > >> >-OperServ- 7. ?b\14\b\14?\14@.ov.nl.home.nl (by CPUMAN on Jan 01 2004;
24617 >> does
24618 >> > >not expire)
24619 >> > >> >-
24620 >> > >> >-OperServ- Limit: 5 - 142.166.*
24621 >> > >> >
24622 >> > >> >Finally services just crashed...
24623 >> > >> >
24624 >> > >> >[16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
24625 >> > >> >[16:47:10] Received SQUIT services.serenia.net from
24626 >> > >services.serenia.net[127.0.0.1] (Services terminating: Segmentation
24627 >> fault)
24628 >> > >> >
24629 >> > >> >and the logs show this...
24630 >> > >> >
24631 >> > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
24632 >> > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] Services terminating: Segmentation fault
24633 >> > >> >[Aug 27 16:47:05 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
24634 >> while
24635 >> > >shutting down
24636 >> > >> >
24637 >> > >> >As for other information we're running Unreal 3.2.1 with the latest
24638 >> > >version of services (5.0.38).
24639 >> > >> >
24640 >> > >> >If there is any other information I can provide please let me know.
24641 >> > >> >
24642 >> > >> >CPUMAN
24643 >> > >> >Network Administrator
24644 >> > >> >Serenia IRC Network
24645 >> > >> >chat.serenia.net
24646 >> > >> >------------------------------------------------------------------
24647 >> > >> >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24648 >> > >> >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24649 >> > >> >
24650 >> > >>
24651 >> > >> /******* - End Original Message - *******/
24652 >> > >>
24653 >> > >>
24654 >> > >>
24655 >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
24656 >> > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24657 >> > >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24658 >> > >>
24659 >> > >
24660 >> > >------------------------------------------------------------------
24661 >> > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24662 >> > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24663 >> >
24664 >> > /******* - End Original Message - *******/
24665 >> >
24666 >> >
24667 >> >
24668 >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
24669 >> > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24670 >> > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24671 >> >
24672 >>
24673 >> ------------------------------
24674 >>
24675 >> _______________________________________________
24676 >> IRCServices mailing list
24677 >> IRCServices@ircservices.za.net
24678 >> http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24679 >>
24680 >> End of IRCServices Digest, Vol 20, Issue 14
24681 >> *******************************************
24682 >------- End of Original Message -------
24683 >
24684 >
24685 >------------------------------------------------------------------
24686 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24687 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24688
24689 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
24690
24691
24692
24693
24694 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Aug 30 11:22:16 2004
24695 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
24696 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24697 Subject: [IRCServices] Exception Del Crash Bug
24698 In-Reply-To: <BAY12-DAV13e1MRpANH000089ee@hotmail.com>
24699 Message-ID: <4132906c.63304@achurch.org>
24700
24701 >I used the 'exception del' command and started getting weird occurrences =
24702 >on the exception list... like blank entries...
24703 [...]
24704 >and I also got corrupted entries as well...
24705 [...]
24706 >Finally services just crashed...
24707 >
24708 >[16:47:10] |G/O| <services.serenia.net> PANIC! signal 11 (no buffer)
24709
24710 Well, I've looked through the code and done some tests myself, but I
24711 haven't been able to find or reproduce the problem. If you can provide a
24712 debug log and backtrace, that would be the most help. Alternatively, can
24713 you send me (privately) a copy of the exception database (exception.db)
24714 with which the problem occurs, and the exact command which triggered the
24715 problem? (There are two different code paths for EXCEPTION DEL, so I need
24716 to know exactly what parameter you gave to the command.)
24717
24718 --Andrew Church
24719 achurch@achurch.org
24720 http://achurch.org/
24721
24722
24723 From dan at skyinternet.co.uk Mon Aug 30 09:50:32 2004
24724 From: dan at skyinternet.co.uk (Dan)
24725 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24726 Subject: [IRCServices] General help please!
24727 Message-ID: <10def3343c66df17bb50bc26e79faff6@skyinternet.co.uk>
24728
24729 Hello!
24730
24731 Hope you're all well and had a good weekend!
24732
24733 Three quick questions please.
24734 I apologise if these has already been answered, to my knowledge I couldn't find them.
24735
24736 We wish to use IRCServices5 with bahamut 1.8.
24737
24738 Everything compiled okay, but when starting the service we got an error relating to sync_operserv_db, is there a fix? I can reproduce the error if needed.
24739
24740 I see that there's an option that only Admins can register channels on ChanServ, which is what we wish to do. How is this dealt with? Do admins still use the REGISTER command and if so which syntax? I couldn't find much documentation regarding it.
24741
24742 Also, is there a way to make ChanServ "sit" permanently in registered channels and be protected from kicks/deops? I heard about a patch for this, but haven't been successful in finding it.
24743
24744 I thank you in advance for any help with these matters, and congratulations on a great service!
24745
24746 Regards,
24747
24748
24749 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Aug 31 01:01:42 2004
24750 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
24751 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24752 Subject: [IRCServices] General help please!
24753 In-Reply-To: <10def3343c66df17bb50bc26e79faff6@skyinternet.co.uk>
24754 Message-ID: <41335187.77660@achurch.org>
24755
24756 >Everything compiled okay, but when starting the service we got an error relating to sync_operserv_db, is there a fix? I can reproduce the error if needed.
24757
24758 This isn't enough information to help find the bug. See FAQ Z.3.
24759
24760 >I see that there's an option that only Admins can register channels on ChanServ, which is what we wish to do. How is this dealt with? Do admins still use the REGISTER command and if so which syntax? I couldn't find much documentation regarding it.
24761
24762 Yes; the option is CSEnableRegister, and it's documented fully in
24763 Appendix A of the manual. (I'll add an explicit reference to it in section
24764 3 as well to clarify this.)
24765
24766 >Also, is there a way to make ChanServ "sit" permanently in registered channels and be protected from kicks/deops? I heard about a patch for this, but haven't been successful in finding it.
24767
24768 I can't speak for others, but as far as I'm concerned, see FAQ Z.6.
24769 (With all due respect, I and others would appreciate if you would take time
24770 to RTFM before writing to the mailing list. The manual is there for a
24771 reason.)
24772
24773 --Andrew Church
24774 achurch@achurch.org
24775 http://achurch.org/
24776
24777
24778 From dan at skyinternet.co.uk Mon Aug 30 10:35:00 2004
24779 From: dan at skyinternet.co.uk (Dan)
24780 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24781 Subject: [IRCServices] General help please!
24782 Message-ID: <476c23414a7e142a249d6f9d507f3eb7@skyinternet.co.uk>
24783
24784 Hiya. Thanks for your reply.
24785 Apologies for being a nuisance...
24786
24787 Okay, the error I get when starting services:
24788
24789 [Aug 30 17:28:51 2004] IRC Services 5.0.38 starting up
24790 [Aug 30 17:28:51 2004] modules: Unable to load module `operserv/main': /home/in/services/lib/modules/operserv/main.so: Undefined symbol "sync_operserv_db"
24791 [Aug 30 17:28:51 2004] Error loading modules, aborting
24792
24793 > Yes; the option is CSEnableRegister, and it's documented fully in
24794 > Appendix A of the manual. (I'll add an explicit reference to it in section
24795 > 3 as well to clarify this.)
24796
24797 I only see in the Manual:
24798
24799 > CSEnableRegister????[OPTIONAL]
24800 >
24801 > Allows the REGISTER command to be used. This is usually a good thing, but if you don't want your users to be able to register channels, remove (or comment out) this directive. Note, however, that Services administrators and the Services super-user will still be able to use the REGISTER command even if this directive is not given.
24802 >
24803 > Example: CSEnableRegister
24804
24805 So for admins, it'd still be the same syntax as normal? Or would they need to give some extra syntaxes to say which user to register the channel to? i.e. if they used the standard syntax, the channel would be registered to them? How can they register it to a different registered nick?
24806
24807 > I can't speak for others, but as far as I'm concerned, see FAQ Z.6.
24808 > (With all due respect, I and others would appreciate if you would take time
24809 > to RTFM before writing to the mailing list. The manual is there for a
24810 > reason.)
24811
24812 It's something we'd really like, and in the manual you mentioned about extra traffic, but if the bot was +d would it really create that much more? I appreciate you're probably been asked this so many times, so I won't continue with it. :)
24813
24814 Thanks again.
24815
24816
24817 From mark at phedny.net Mon Aug 30 09:53:33 2004
24818 From: mark at phedny.net (M. van Cuijk)
24819 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24820 Subject: [IRCServices] General help please!
24821 In-Reply-To: <476c23414a7e142a249d6f9d507f3eb7@skyinternet.co.uk>
24822 References: <476c23414a7e142a249d6f9d507f3eb7@skyinternet.co.uk>
24823 Message-ID: <41335B8D.1050207@phedny.net>
24824
24825 Dan wrote:
24826
24827 > So for admins, it'd still be the same syntax as normal? Or would they
24828 > need to give some extra syntaxes to say which user to register the
24829 > channel to? i.e. if they used the standard syntax, the channel would
24830 > be registered to them? How can they register it to a different
24831 > registered nick?
24832
24833 Channel founder is always the person who REGISTERs it, unless it's
24834 changes with a ChanServ SET FOUNDER. Please read /msg ChanServ HELP SET
24835 FOUNDER
24836 And indeed, the syntax is the same, as you actually use the normal
24837 command. But you could always check the syntax with a HELP message.
24838
24839 - Mark
24840 -------------- next part --------------
24841 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
24842 Name: smime.p7s
24843 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
24844 Size: 2981 bytes
24845 Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
24846 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040830/8d1d7274/smime.bin
24847 From dan at skyinternet.co.uk Mon Aug 30 10:59:56 2004
24848 From: dan at skyinternet.co.uk (Dan)
24849 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24850 Subject: [IRCServices] General help please!
24851 Message-ID: <867deb5961f4933e02a6e72b90e31942@skyinternet.co.uk>
24852
24853 Hello again.
24854 So even with that option, there's no way to to *directly* register a channel to someone else?
24855 Instead, that person would need to register the channel, and change the FOUNDER?
24856
24857 -----Original message-----
24858 From: "M. van Cuijk" mark@phedny.net
24859 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:53:53 +0100
24860 To: IRC Services General Mailing List ircservices@ircservices.za.net
24861 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] General help please!
24862
24863 > Dan wrote:
24864 >
24865 > > So for admins, it'd still be the same syntax as normal? Or would they
24866 > > need to give some extra syntaxes to say which user to register the
24867 > > channel to? i.e. if they used the standard syntax, the channel would
24868 > > be registered to them? How can they register it to a different
24869 > > registered nick?
24870 >
24871 > Channel founder is always the person who REGISTERs it, unless it's
24872 > changes with a ChanServ SET FOUNDER. Please read /msg ChanServ HELP SET
24873 > FOUNDER
24874 > And indeed, the syntax is the same, as you actually use the normal
24875 > command. But you could always check the syntax with a HELP message.
24876 >
24877 > - Mark
24878 >
24879
24880
24881
24882 From chris at starglade.org Mon Aug 30 10:43:37 2004
24883 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
24884 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24885 Subject: [IRCServices] General help please!
24886 In-Reply-To: <867deb5961f4933e02a6e72b90e31942@skyinternet.co.uk>
24887 References: <867deb5961f4933e02a6e72b90e31942@skyinternet.co.uk>
24888 Message-ID: <41336749.2070307@starglade.org>
24889
24890 Dan wrote:
24891
24892 > Hello again.
24893 > So even with that option, there's no way to to *directly* register a channel to someone else?
24894 > Instead, that person would need to register the channel, and change the FOUNDER?
24895
24896 Correct - if you want this feature, I know srvx (the services used on
24897 GameSurge) supports it (http://www.srvx.net/), exactly as you have
24898 described.
24899
24900 Chris
24901
24902 --
24903 Chris Jenkinson
24904 chris@starglade.org
24905
24906
24907 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon Aug 30 11:15:50 2004
24908 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
24909 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24910 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
24911 Message-ID: <mailman.76.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
24912
24913 >From what i've seen, this feature doesnt exist yet, but i'm sure others would find it useful.
24914
24915 As i mentioned the other day, our Network has been undergoing several Distributed Denial of Service attacks, Most of them are aimed at the server in which services are hosted. Our Oper team came up with a 'Redundancy' plan, basically, a copy of services, which has a copy of the databases (up to an hour old, transfered via. crontab), however, obviously due to the possible age of these databases, and them not being 'live', changing them would be pointless, because when the main services come back, all changes to the database wont exist anymore.
24916
24917 So i propose a config option which prevents modifying of nicknames, chanserv, no memos, etc, just something which will allow people's channels and Nicknames to still be protected, autoops etc, and most services features, just without modifying nicknames / channels being arround. Obviously i could put a .lock file in the database directory, and enable no register, but this wont stop users becomming confused when their nicknames / channels suddenly change back to a previous setting. Just a message like:
24918
24919 -NickServ/ChanServ/MemoServ/OperServ- For Security Reasons, Services is currently in Read-Only Mode, no changes to nicknames or channels will be saved.
24920
24921 When they attempt to execute a command.
24922
24923 Just a thought, Opinions would be nice :)
24924
24925 /****************************************
24926 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24927 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24928 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24929 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24930 ****************************************/
24931
24932
24933
24934
24935 From brandx at madd-chat.co.uk Mon Aug 30 13:29:46 2004
24936 From: brandx at madd-chat.co.uk (Tom Moyer)
24937 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
24938 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
24939 In-Reply-To: <200408301918319.SM02728@mx01.g1b50n.co.za>
24940 Message-ID: <200408301929.i7UJTu9M008033@smtp-mtc08.proxy.aol.com>
24941
24942 Craig the coding side I don't know much about, as I am not a coder, and I
24943 joined this msg board primarily to see what is new with IRC services, and
24944 maybe talk myself in to switching back. That being said, my only question
24945 to you is this. Why didn't you keep the ip address to your services box
24946 private... most ircd's hide it now. You can't do a /stats c unless you're
24947 an ircoper on most ircd's so why did you give out that ip address? The one
24948 sure fire way to keep services going, and to keep your network from being
24949 taken out in one fail swoop is to keep all your hubs and Services on private
24950 ip addresses. IE ip addresses that no one knows about.
24951
24952 -----Original Message-----
24953 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
24954 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] On Behalf Of Craig McLure
24955 Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:16 PM
24956 To: ircservices
24957 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
24958
24959 >From what i've seen, this feature doesnt exist yet, but i'm sure others
24960 would find it useful.
24961
24962 As i mentioned the other day, our Network has been undergoing several
24963 Distributed Denial of Service attacks, Most of them are aimed at the server
24964 in which services are hosted. Our Oper team came up with a 'Redundancy'
24965 plan, basically, a copy of services, which has a copy of the databases (up
24966 to an hour old, transfered via. crontab), however, obviously due to the
24967 possible age of these databases, and them not being 'live', changing them
24968 would be pointless, because when the main services come back, all changes to
24969 the database wont exist anymore.
24970
24971 So i propose a config option which prevents modifying of nicknames,
24972 chanserv, no memos, etc, just something which will allow people's channels
24973 and Nicknames to still be protected, autoops etc, and most services
24974 features, just without modifying nicknames / channels being arround.
24975 Obviously i could put a .lock file in the database directory, and enable no
24976 register, but this wont stop users becomming confused when their nicknames /
24977 channels suddenly change back to a previous setting. Just a message like:
24978
24979 -NickServ/ChanServ/MemoServ/OperServ- For Security Reasons, Services is
24980 currently in Read-Only Mode, no changes to nicknames or channels will be
24981 saved.
24982
24983 When they attempt to execute a command.
24984
24985 Just a thought, Opinions would be nice :)
24986
24987 /****************************************
24988 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
24989 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
24990 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
24991 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
24992 ****************************************/
24993
24994
24995
24996 ------------------------------------------------------------------
24997 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
24998 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
24999
25000
25001
25002 From quension at mac.com Mon Aug 30 14:12:13 2004
25003 From: quension at mac.com (Trevor Talbot)
25004 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25005 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25006 In-Reply-To: <200408301817.i7UIHUIV007304@mac.com>
25007 Message-ID: <43B3E1F2-FAC9-11D8-874E-0003938D6866@mac.com>
25008
25009 On Monday, Aug 30, 2004, at 11:15 US/Pacific, Craig McLure wrote:
25010
25011 > So i propose a config option which prevents modifying of nicknames,
25012 > chanserv, no memos, etc, just something which will allow people's
25013 > channels and Nicknames to still be protected, autoops etc, and most
25014 > services features, just without modifying nicknames / channels being
25015 > arround.
25016
25017 ./services -readonly ?
25018
25019 -- Quension
25020
25021
25022
25023 From medice at gmx.at Mon Aug 30 14:16:48 2004
25024 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
25025 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25026 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25027 In-Reply-To: <200408301929.i7UJTu9M008033@smtp-mtc08.proxy.aol.com>
25028 References: <200408301929.i7UJTu9M008033@smtp-mtc08.proxy.aol.com>
25029 Message-ID: <41339940.20007@gmx.at>
25030
25031 Tom Moyer wrote:
25032 > Craig the coding side I don't know much about, as I am not a coder, and I
25033 > joined this msg board primarily to see what is new with IRC services, and
25034 > maybe talk myself in to switching back. That being said, my only question
25035 > to you is this. Why didn't you keep the ip address to your services box
25036 > private... most ircd's hide it now. You can't do a /stats c unless you're
25037 > an ircoper on most ircd's so why did you give out that ip address? The one
25038 > sure fire way to keep services going, and to keep your network from being
25039 > taken out in one fail swoop is to keep all your hubs and Services on private
25040 > ip addresses. IE ip addresses that no one knows about.
25041
25042 What kind of DDos? Mass-Clones joining your network and sending inside
25043 IRC many commands around - or something directly on the machines?
25044
25045 If second, I would agree with Tom Moyer - it's a good idea to run hubs
25046 and especially services on secret IPs - if your ircd may block /stats
25047 for non-opers - you're a winner - if not, you may play around with dns
25048 f.e. services.yournet.tld = 127.0.0.1 for the world - and has the
25049 "correct" DNS-entry only the uplink-ircd (same with
25050 uplink-hub.yournet.tld maybe?) - i've this constellation on several
25051 networks where /stats c is allowed to users...
25052
25053 I know - ddos is a !"$&$"$(( - but one possible solution worth a try is
25054 to move targets out of range, as good as possible...
25055
25056 greets and good luck on fighting ddos
25057
25058 /medice
25059
25060
25061
25062 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Aug 31 09:23:48 2004
25063 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25064 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25065 Subject: [IRCServices] General help please!
25066 In-Reply-To: <476c23414a7e142a249d6f9d507f3eb7@skyinternet.co.uk>
25067 Message-ID: <4133c538.00564@achurch.org>
25068
25069 >[Aug 30 17:28:51 2004] IRC Services 5.0.38 starting up
25070 >[Aug 30 17:28:51 2004] modules: Unable to load module `operserv/main': /home/in/services/lib/modules/operserv/main.so: Undefined symbol "sync_operserv_db"
25071 >[Aug 30 17:28:51 2004] Error loading modules, aborting
25072
25073 You're loading the modules in the wrong order. See the example
25074 ircservices.conf file for the proper order to load the modules in.
25075
25076 --Andrew Church
25077 achurch@achurch.org
25078 http://achurch.org/
25079
25080
25081 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Tue Aug 31 02:06:01 2004
25082 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
25083 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25084 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25085 Message-ID: <mailman.77.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25086
25087 As far as i know, this allows changes to nicknames and channels, it just doesnt save the databases.
25088
25089 The problem we have with having services in a different location, is that we have a lot of users, and only a few servers, the cost of a lot of servers is obviously relativly high, unfortunantly, at this point in time, a seperate hub for services isn't an option.
25090
25091 Currently, the attackers seem to be primarily attacking the server in which services is linked too.
25092
25093 /****************************************
25094 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25095 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25096 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25097 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25098 ****************************************/
25099
25100
25101 /****************************************
25102 * From - Trevor Talbot <quension@mac.com>
25103 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25104 * Sent - 22:12:13 @ 2004-08-30
25105 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25106 ****************************************/
25107
25108 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25109
25110 >On Monday, Aug 30, 2004, at 11:15 US/Pacific, Craig McLure wrote:
25111 >
25112 >> So i propose a config option which prevents modifying of nicknames,
25113 >> chanserv, no memos, etc, just something which will allow people's
25114 >> channels and Nicknames to still be protected, autoops etc, and most
25115 >> services features, just without modifying nicknames / channels being
25116 >> arround.
25117 >
25118 >./services -readonly ?
25119 >
25120 >-- Quension
25121 >
25122 >
25123 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25124 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25125 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25126 >.
25127
25128 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
25129
25130
25131
25132
25133 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Aug 31 18:25:32 2004
25134 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25135 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25136 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25137 In-Reply-To: <41344043.14211@mail.achurch.org>
25138 Message-ID: <41344488.01676@achurch.org>
25139
25140 >As far as i know
25141
25142 Try extending your knowledge, then:
25143
25144 ./ircservices -readonly
25145 [...]
25146 -> *NickServ* set hide off
25147 -NickServ- Sorry, nickname option setting is temporarily disabled.
25148
25149 --Andrew Church
25150 achurch@achurch.org
25151 http://achurch.org/
25152
25153
25154 From greco at gate.net Wed Sep 1 11:41:46 2004
25155 From: greco at gate.net (gregg conklin)
25156 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25157 Subject: [IRCServices] modules/mail/smtp.c bug
25158 Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.2.20040901141752.032ad258@pop.gate.net>
25159
25160 i was just setting up ircservices today and everything is working great,
25161 except sending mail out through the relay. i'm running 5.0.38. i apologize
25162 if this is already know and i'm just cluttering up the list.
25163
25164 i'm using my isp as the relay (mailhost.gate.net:25) and they return
25165 multiple lines upon connecting.
25166
25167 220-smtp6.mindspring.com ESMTP Exim 3.33 #1 Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:20:42 -0400
25168 220-NO UCE. EarthLink does not authorize the use of its computers or network
25169 220 equipment to deliver, accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited e-mail.
25170
25171 and it seems that smtp.c isn't correctly handling the multiple lines.
25172
25173 around line 177 of smtp.c is
25174 if (!si->replycode) {
25175 ...
25176 si->replycode = strtol(buf, &s, 10);
25177 ...
25178 si->replychar = buf[3];
25179 }
25180
25181 what's happening is the first time through
25182 220-smtp6.mindspring.com ESMTP Exim 3.33 #1 Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:20:42 -0400
25183
25184 is getting parsed out as
25185 220 and '-'
25186 the next time through, si->replycode is still 220 so it's not reparsed. the
25187 third response:
25188 220 equipment to deliver, accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited e-mail.
25189
25190 should be parsed as 220 and ' ' but it never is.
25191
25192 the 'fix' i implemented here that seems to work was to take the following
25193 and break it up:
25194
25195 old:
25196 if (!have_eol || si->replychar != ' ')
25197 return;
25198
25199 new:
25200 if (!have_eol)
25201 return;
25202
25203 if (si->replychar != ' ')
25204 {
25205 si->replycode = 0;
25206 return;
25207 }
25208
25209 that should cause si->replycode to be correctly parsed for each received line.
25210
25211 anyway, hope this helps somebody else having the same troubles.
25212
25213 thanks for the ircservices,
25214 -gregg
25215
25216
25217
25218 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Sep 2 09:42:12 2004
25219 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25220 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25221 Subject: [IRCServices] modules/mail/smtp.c bug
25222 In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040901141752.032ad258@pop.gate.net>
25223 Message-ID: <41366c7a.05617@achurch.org>
25224
25225 Fixed, thanks for the report. (Actually, looking over the code I'm
25226 amazed it worked at all...)
25227
25228 --Andrew Church
25229 achurch@achurch.org
25230 http://achurch.org/
25231
25232 >i was just setting up ircservices today and everything is working great,
25233 >except sending mail out through the relay. i'm running 5.0.38. i apologize
25234 >if this is already know and i'm just cluttering up the list.
25235 >
25236 >i'm using my isp as the relay (mailhost.gate.net:25) and they return
25237 >multiple lines upon connecting.
25238 >
25239 >220-smtp6.mindspring.com ESMTP Exim 3.33 #1 Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:20:42 -0400
25240 >220-NO UCE. EarthLink does not authorize the use of its computers or network
25241 >220 equipment to deliver, accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited e-mail.
25242 >
25243 >and it seems that smtp.c isn't correctly handling the multiple lines.
25244 >
25245 >around line 177 of smtp.c is
25246 > if (!si->replycode) {
25247 >...
25248 > si->replycode = strtol(buf, &s, 10);
25249 >...
25250 > si->replychar = buf[3];
25251 >}
25252 >
25253 >what's happening is the first time through
25254 >220-smtp6.mindspring.com ESMTP Exim 3.33 #1 Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:20:42 -0400
25255 >
25256 >is getting parsed out as
25257 >220 and '-'
25258 >the next time through, si->replycode is still 220 so it's not reparsed. the
25259 >third response:
25260 >220 equipment to deliver, accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited e-mail.
25261 >
25262 >should be parsed as 220 and ' ' but it never is.
25263 >
25264 >the 'fix' i implemented here that seems to work was to take the following
25265 >and break it up:
25266 >
25267 >old:
25268 > if (!have_eol || si->replychar != ' ')
25269 > return;
25270 >
25271 >new:
25272 > if (!have_eol)
25273 > return;
25274 >
25275 > if (si->replychar != ' ')
25276 > {
25277 > si->replycode = 0;
25278 > return;
25279 > }
25280 >
25281 >that should cause si->replycode to be correctly parsed for each received line.
25282 >
25283 >anyway, hope this helps somebody else having the same troubles.
25284 >
25285 >thanks for the ircservices,
25286 >-gregg
25287 >
25288 >
25289 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25290 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25291 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25292
25293
25294 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Sep 3 13:26:19 2004
25295 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25296 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25297 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25298 Message-ID: <4137f96b.61105@achurch.org>
25299
25300 I'm currently working on unifying the usage formats of the various
25301 LIST-type commands available in Services (LIST, ACCESS LIST, AKILL LIST,
25302 etc.), and I'd like to get some information about how the commands,
25303 ChanServ's ACCESS (and AKICK) LIST in particular, are currently being used.
25304
25305 In Services 5.0, there are three different styles of LIST command:
25306
25307 - NickServ ACCESS LIST:
25308 LIST (no parameters, unlimited)
25309 - NickServ LIST/LISTEMAIL, ChanServ LIST, OperServ AKILL/EXCLUDE/SxLINE LIST:
25310 LIST <wildcard-mask> (limited to NSListMax, CSListMax, or 50 entries)
25311 - ChanServ ACCESS/AKICK LIST, OperServ EXCEPTION LIST:
25312 LIST {<wildcard-mask> | <number-list>}
25313
25314 I won't go into detail since discussion of development versions is
25315 off-topic for this list, but I'm working on merging all of these into a
25316 common format. The major issue is how to handle numbered and numberless
25317 lists; the easiest thing to do is simply to drop support for using a number
25318 list with the LIST command, but I don't want to do that if it's a
25319 frequently-used feature. So:
25320
25321 (1) How do you (or your users, if you're an admin and aware of usage
25322 patterns) usually use the ChanServ ACCESS LIST and AKICK LIST commands:
25323 just plain LIST, LIST with a wildcard, or LIST with a list/range of
25324 numbers?
25325
25326 (2) Would you object to having the ability to use numbers with the
25327 LIST command removed? (The numbers would still be usable with DEL.)
25328
25329 As a side note, the issue of whether to add numbers to lists that
25330 don't currently have them--nickname access lists, autokill lists, and so
25331 on--has been brought up before. I haven't decided yet whether to do that,
25332 but it's a separate issue from this one, so please don't discuss it in
25333 this thread.
25334
25335 --Andrew Church
25336 achurch@achurch.org
25337 http://achurch.org/
25338
25339
25340 From mark at ctcp.net Fri Sep 3 01:29:26 2004
25341 From: mark at ctcp.net (M)
25342 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25343 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25344 In-Reply-To: <4137f96b.61105@achurch.org>
25345 Message-ID: <E1C39Tw-000CvS-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
25346
25347 Andrew Church wrote:
25348 > (1) How do you (or your users, if you're an admin and
25349 > aware of usage
25350 > patterns) usually use the ChanServ ACCESS LIST and AKICK LIST
25351 > commands:
25352 > just plain LIST, LIST with a wildcard, or LIST with a
25353 > list/range of numbers?
25354
25355 Plain LIST and LIST wildcard.
25356
25357 > (2) Would you object to having the ability to use
25358 > numbers with the LIST command removed? (The numbers would
25359 > still be usable with DEL.)
25360
25361 No objection. I would suggest however that removing numbers from elsewhere
25362 should also remove numbers from the DEL command. If LIST is not going to
25363 print the numbers, I forsee errors being made by users if they can delete by
25364 a number that has never been displayed.
25365
25366 M.
25367
25368
25369
25370 From phan70m at gmail.com Fri Sep 3 01:40:08 2004
25371 From: phan70m at gmail.com (PHANTOm)
25372 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25373 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25374 In-Reply-To: <4137f96b.61105@achurch.org>
25375 References: <4137f96b.61105@achurch.org>
25376 Message-ID: <d50f59a004090301403ab9f92@mail.gmail.com>
25377
25378 On my network users who seek information from AKICK list will usually
25379 request the full list or some kind of wildcard, almost none use
25380 numbers for this command.
25381 The access list command is commonly accessed by numbers but is access
25382 by wildcards as well.
25383 The os_akill command usually being accesses by wildcards to find
25384 something specific but if an admin wants to view all results he may
25385 use numbers to see next range, this may be replaced by some "next"
25386 command.
25387 The nickserv/chanserv list commands i think should be used the same
25388 way (wildcards + first/prev/next/last commands), numbers in this case
25389 may help not loose track when jumping between many pages and may also
25390 help if new features will be developed (like dropnick with nick number
25391 instead of the nickname, although this may be dangerous).
25392 same goes for listemail.
25393
25394 I think since I use numbers mostly for navigation an alternative
25395 method would eliminate the need for numbers.
25396
25397 ______________
25398 www.irc.nix.co.il
25399
25400 On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 13:26:19 JST, Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org> wrote:
25401 > I'm currently working on unifying the usage formats of the various
25402 > LIST-type commands available in Services (LIST, ACCESS LIST, AKILL LIST,
25403 > etc.), and I'd like to get some information about how the commands,
25404 > ChanServ's ACCESS (and AKICK) LIST in particular, are currently being used.
25405 >
25406 > In Services 5.0, there are three different styles of LIST command:
25407 >
25408 > - NickServ ACCESS LIST:
25409 > LIST (no parameters, unlimited)
25410 > - NickServ LIST/LISTEMAIL, ChanServ LIST, OperServ AKILL/EXCLUDE/SxLINE LIST:
25411 > LIST <wildcard-mask> (limited to NSListMax, CSListMax, or 50 entries)
25412 > - ChanServ ACCESS/AKICK LIST, OperServ EXCEPTION LIST:
25413 > LIST {<wildcard-mask> | <number-list>}
25414 >
25415 > I won't go into detail since discussion of development versions is
25416 > off-topic for this list, but I'm working on merging all of these into a
25417 > common format. The major issue is how to handle numbered and numberless
25418 > lists; the easiest thing to do is simply to drop support for using a number
25419 > list with the LIST command, but I don't want to do that if it's a
25420 > frequently-used feature. So:
25421 >
25422 > (1) How do you (or your users, if you're an admin and aware of usage
25423 > patterns) usually use the ChanServ ACCESS LIST and AKICK LIST commands:
25424 > just plain LIST, LIST with a wildcard, or LIST with a list/range of
25425 > numbers?
25426 >
25427 > (2) Would you object to having the ability to use numbers with the
25428 > LIST command removed? (The numbers would still be usable with DEL.)
25429 >
25430 > As a side note, the issue of whether to add numbers to lists that
25431 > don't currently have them--nickname access lists, autokill lists, and so
25432 > on--has been brought up before. I haven't decided yet whether to do that,
25433 > but it's a separate issue from this one, so please don't discuss it in
25434 > this thread.
25435 >
25436 > --Andrew Church
25437 > achurch@achurch.org
25438 > http://achurch.org/
25439 >
25440 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
25441 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25442 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25443 >
25444
25445
25446 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Sep 3 22:47:09 2004
25447 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25448 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25449 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25450 In-Reply-To: <E1C39Tw-000CvS-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
25451 Message-ID: <4138766b.17507@achurch.org>
25452
25453 >> (2) Would you object to having the ability to use
25454 >> numbers with the LIST command removed? (The numbers would
25455 >> still be usable with DEL.)
25456 >
25457 >No objection. I would suggest however that removing numbers from elsewhere
25458 >should also remove numbers from the DEL command. If LIST is not going to
25459 >print the numbers, I forsee errors being made by users if they can delete by
25460 >a number that has never been displayed.
25461
25462 Sorry, I should have been clearer: the numbers would still be
25463 displayed, but the LIST command wouldn't accept them. Though on second
25464 thought, it may be simpler to just remove the numbers entirely, if they're
25465 not being widely used.
25466
25467 --Andrew Church
25468 achurch@achurch.org
25469 http://achurch.org/
25470
25471
25472 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Sep 3 12:30:26 2004
25473 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
25474 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25475 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25476 Message-ID: <mailman.78.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25477
25478 Well, if my SMTP server has decided to start working, i'll respond.. I only use numerical IDs if for whatever reason, it wont remove by nickname (it has happened once or twice, not sure why), other than that, i use nicknames, because its safer, its easier to type a wrong number which means more work :)
25479
25480 /****************************************
25481 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25482 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25483 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25484 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25485 ****************************************/
25486
25487
25488 /****************************************
25489 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
25490 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25491 * Sent - 22:47:09 @ 2004-09-03
25492 * Subject - RE: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25493 ****************************************/
25494
25495 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25496
25497 >>> (2) Would you object to having the ability to use
25498 >>> numbers with the LIST command removed? (The numbers would
25499 >>> still be usable with DEL.)
25500 >>
25501 >>No objection. I would suggest however that removing numbers from elsewhere
25502 >>should also remove numbers from the DEL command. If LIST is not going to
25503 >>print the numbers, I forsee errors being made by users if they can delete by
25504 >>a number that has never been displayed.
25505 >
25506 > Sorry, I should have been clearer: the numbers would still be
25507 >displayed, but the LIST command wouldn't accept them. Though on second
25508 >thought, it may be simpler to just remove the numbers entirely, if they're
25509 >not being widely used.
25510 >
25511 > --Andrew Church
25512 > achurch@achurch.org
25513 > http://achurch.org/
25514 >
25515 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25516 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25517 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25518
25519 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
25520
25521
25522
25523
25524 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Sep 3 15:06:23 2004
25525 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
25526 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25527 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25528 Message-ID: <E1C3N8v-0001HO-8f@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
25529
25530 we need a way to list a range or subset of items...
25531
25532 if i remember /os akill list with a huge akill list floods off the unfortunate services oper that does it, no matter what the sendq and recvq of the services server or the oper themselves.
25533
25534 >Well, if my SMTP server has decided to start working, i'll respond.. I only use numerical IDs if for whatever reason, it wont remove by nickname (it has happened once or twice, not sure why), other than that, i use nicknames, because its safer, its easier to type a wrong number which means more work :)
25535 >
25536 >/****************************************
25537 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25538 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25539 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25540 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25541 > ****************************************/
25542 >
25543 >
25544 >/****************************************
25545 > * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
25546 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25547 > * Sent - 22:47:09 @ 2004-09-03
25548 > * Subject - RE: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25549 > ****************************************/
25550 >
25551 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25552 >
25553 >>>> (2) Would you object to having the ability to use
25554 >>>> numbers with the LIST command removed? (The numbers would
25555 >>>> still be usable with DEL.)
25556 >>>
25557 >>>No objection. I would suggest however that removing numbers from elsewhere
25558 >>>should also remove numbers from the DEL command. If LIST is not going to
25559 >>>print the numbers, I forsee errors being made by users if they can delete by
25560 >>>a number that has never been displayed.
25561 >>
25562 >> Sorry, I should have been clearer: the numbers would still be
25563 >>displayed, but the LIST command wouldn't accept them. Though on second
25564 >>thought, it may be simpler to just remove the numbers entirely, if they're
25565 >>not being widely used.
25566 >>
25567 >> --Andrew Church
25568 >> achurch@achurch.org
25569 >> http://achurch.org/
25570 >>
25571 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
25572 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25573 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25574 >
25575 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
25576 >
25577 >
25578 >
25579 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25580 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25581 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25582 >
25583
25584
25585
25586 From mark at ctcp.net Fri Sep 3 15:17:41 2004
25587 From: mark at ctcp.net (M)
25588 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25589 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25590 In-Reply-To: <E1C3N8v-0001HO-8f@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
25591 Message-ID: <E1C3MPU-000Fzd-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
25592
25593 Craig Edwards wrote:
25594 > we need a way to list a range or subset of items...
25595
25596 Wouldn't this be covered by wildcards?
25597
25598 As to potential floods, an extension of the limits used for chanserv and
25599 nickserv lists should suffice.
25600
25601 M.
25602
25603
25604
25605 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Sep 4 11:20:38 2004
25606 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25607 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25608 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS LIST
25609 In-Reply-To: <E1C3N8v-0001HO-8f@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
25610 Message-ID: <413926c2.02036@achurch.org>
25611
25612 >we need a way to list a range or subset of items...
25613 >
25614 >if i remember /os akill list with a huge akill list floods off the unfortunate services oper that does it, no matter what the sendq and recvq of the services server or the oper themselves.
25615
25616 This is already taken care of (hard limit of 50 in current 5.0; 5.1
25617 will be more flexible and let you specify a start point for the search,
25618 much like web search engines that say "next N hits").
25619
25620 --Andrew Church
25621 achurch@achurch.org
25622 http://achurch.org/
25623
25624
25625 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Sep 4 04:44:38 2004
25626 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
25627 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25628 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS
25629 LIST
25630 Message-ID: <E1C3Zup-0002ml-3x@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
25631
25632 this is what i meant andy, thanks ;-)
25633
25634 >>we need a way to list a range or subset of items...
25635 >>
25636 >>if i remember /os akill list with a huge akill list floods off the unfortunate services oper that does it, no matter what the sendq and recvq of the services server or the oper themselves.
25637 >
25638 > This is already taken care of (hard limit of 50 in current 5.0; 5.1
25639 >will be more flexible and let you specify a start point for the search,
25640 >much like web search engines that say "next N hits").
25641 >
25642
25643
25644
25645
25646 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Sep 4 04:45:50 2004
25647 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
25648 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25649 Subject: [IRCServices] Question on usage of ChanServ ACCESS
25650 LIST
25651 Message-ID: <E1C3Zvz-0002n5-FG@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
25652
25653 no, wildcards are only of use if you know what youre looking for.
25654
25655 commands such as killchan may add hundreds of akills which are not easily pinned down by wildcard matches, which is why andy originally limited LIST to X entries at a time.
25656
25657 >Craig Edwards wrote:
25658 >> we need a way to list a range or subset of items...
25659 >
25660 >Wouldn't this be covered by wildcards?
25661 >
25662 >As to potential floods, an extension of the limits used for chanserv and
25663 >nickserv lists should suffice.
25664 >
25665 >M.
25666 >
25667 >
25668 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25669 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25670 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25671 >
25672
25673
25674
25675 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Sep 4 18:24:02 2004
25676 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
25677 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:12 2004
25678 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25679 Message-ID: <mailman.79.1098597732.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25680
25681 I extended my knowledge... and did some testing.. however...
25682
25683 (02:21:31) ??? [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] Sorry, nickname option setting is temporarily disabled.
25684 ^^ Very Nice..
25685
25686 (02:22:12) ??? [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] test@test.com added to your access list.
25687 ^^ not good..
25688
25689 A lot of things like access list modification can still be done, meaning -readonly isnt truly read-only.
25690
25691 imo, if services are started with -readonly NOTHING should be allowed to be changed.
25692
25693 Just my 2c..
25694
25695 /****************************************
25696 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25697 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25698 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25699 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25700 ****************************************/
25701
25702
25703 /****************************************
25704 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
25705 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25706 * Sent - 18:25:32 @ 2004-08-31
25707 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25708 ****************************************/
25709
25710 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25711
25712 >>As far as i know
25713 >
25714 > Try extending your knowledge, then:
25715 >
25716 >./ircservices -readonly
25717 >[...]
25718 >-> *NickServ* set hide off
25719 >-NickServ- Sorry, nickname option setting is temporarily disabled.
25720 >
25721 > --Andrew Church
25722 > achurch@achurch.org
25723 > http://achurch.org/
25724 >
25725 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25726 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25727 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25728
25729 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
25730
25731
25732
25733
25734 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 5 10:35:26 2004
25735 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25736 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
25737 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25738 In-Reply-To: <413a6b28.26336@mail.achurch.org>
25739 Message-ID: <413a6f43.02460@achurch.org>
25740
25741 >(02:22:12) [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] test@test.com added to your access list.
25742 >^^ not good..
25743
25744 Oops, that shouldn't be possible. Fixed; let me know if you find any
25745 more.
25746
25747 --Andrew Church
25748 achurch@achurch.org
25749 http://achurch.org/
25750
25751
25752 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Sep 4 18:56:59 2004
25753 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
25754 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
25755 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25756 Message-ID: <mailman.80.1098597733.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25757
25758 The ones i found:
25759
25760 link / unlink (it notes that changes wont be saved.. but thats kinda redundant imo, if it wont save it, why let them link?) and AJOIN
25761
25762 Chanserv AKICK, LEVEL and DROP commands.
25763
25764 I havnt NOTICED any others, there are operserv commands, eg. Akill, but they are best kept tbh :p
25765
25766
25767
25768 /****************************************
25769 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25770 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25771 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25772 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25773 ****************************************/
25774
25775
25776 /****************************************
25777 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
25778 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25779 * Sent - 10:35:26 @ 2004-09-05
25780 * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25781 ****************************************/
25782
25783 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25784
25785 >>(02:22:12) [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] test@test.com added to your access list.
25786 >>^^ not good..
25787 >
25788 > Oops, that shouldn't be possible. Fixed; let me know if you find any
25789 >more.
25790 >
25791 > --Andrew Church
25792 > achurch@achurch.org
25793 > http://achurch.org/
25794 >
25795 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25796 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25797 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25798
25799 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
25800
25801
25802
25803
25804 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 5 11:21:58 2004
25805 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25806 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
25807 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25808 In-Reply-To: <413a72b9.26356@mail.achurch.org>
25809 Message-ID: <413a78cc.02624@achurch.org>
25810
25811 Make sure you check as a normal user--Services overrides some of the
25812 readonly checks for Services admins.
25813
25814 --Andrew Church
25815 achurch@achurch.org
25816 http://achurch.org/
25817
25818 >The ones i found:
25819 >
25820 >link / unlink (it notes that changes wont be saved.. but thats kinda redundant imo, if it wont save it, why let them link?) and AJOIN
25821 >
25822 >Chanserv AKICK, LEVEL and DROP commands.
25823 >
25824 >I havnt NOTICED any others, there are operserv commands, eg. Akill, but they are best kept tbh :p
25825 >
25826 >
25827 >
25828 >/****************************************
25829 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25830 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25831 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25832 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25833 > ****************************************/
25834 >
25835 >
25836 >/****************************************
25837 > * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
25838 > * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25839 > * Sent - 10:35:26 @ 2004-09-05
25840 > * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25841 > ****************************************/
25842 >
25843 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25844 >
25845 >>>(02:22:12) [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] test@test.com added to your access list.
25846 >>>^^ not good..
25847 >>
25848 >> Oops, that shouldn't be possible. Fixed; let me know if you find any
25849 >>more.
25850 >>
25851 >> --Andrew Church
25852 >> achurch@achurch.org
25853 >> http://achurch.org/
25854 >>
25855 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
25856 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25857 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25858 >
25859 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
25860 >
25861 >
25862 >
25863 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25864 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25865 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25866
25867
25868 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Sep 4 19:37:01 2004
25869 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
25870 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
25871 Subject: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25872 Message-ID: <mailman.81.1098597733.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25873
25874 Sorry, CS LEVELS and NS AJOIN both still work when not oppered.
25875
25876 /****************************************
25877 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25878 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25879 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25880 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25881 ****************************************/
25882
25883
25884 /****************************************
25885 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
25886 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25887 * Sent - 11:21:58 @ 2004-09-05
25888 * Subject - Re: Re: Re: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25889 ****************************************/
25890
25891 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25892
25893 > Make sure you check as a normal user--Services overrides some of the
25894 >readonly checks for Services admins.
25895 >
25896 > --Andrew Church
25897 > achurch@achurch.org
25898 > http://achurch.org/
25899 >
25900 >>The ones i found:
25901 >>
25902 >>link / unlink (it notes that changes wont be saved.. but thats kinda redundant imo, if it wont save it, why let them link?) and AJOIN
25903 >>
25904 >>Chanserv AKICK, LEVEL and DROP commands.
25905 >>
25906 >>I havnt NOTICED any others, there are operserv commands, eg. Akill, but they are best kept tbh :p
25907 >>
25908 >>
25909 >>
25910 >>/****************************************
25911 >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
25912 >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
25913 >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
25914 >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
25915 >> ****************************************/
25916 >>
25917 >>
25918 >>/****************************************
25919 >> * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
25920 >> * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
25921 >> * Sent - 10:35:26 @ 2004-09-05
25922 >> * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] "Read Only Mode"
25923 >> ****************************************/
25924 >>
25925 >>/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
25926 >>
25927 >>>>(02:22:12) [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] test@test.com added to your access list.
25928 >>>>^^ not good..
25929 >>>
25930 >>> Oops, that shouldn't be possible. Fixed; let me know if you find any
25931 >>>more.
25932 >>>
25933 >>> --Andrew Church
25934 >>> achurch@achurch.org
25935 >>> http://achurch.org/
25936 >>>
25937 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
25938 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25939 >>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25940 >>
25941 >>/******* - End Original Message - *******/
25942 >>
25943 >>
25944 >>
25945 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
25946 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25947 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25948 >
25949 >------------------------------------------------------------------
25950 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
25951 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
25952
25953 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
25954
25955
25956
25957
25958 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 5 13:01:42 2004
25959 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
25960 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
25961 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.39 released
25962 Message-ID: <413a903b.24501@achurch.org>
25963
25964 Services 5.0.39 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
25965
25966 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
25967
25968 05926ecf0ba8ad3fdc163cbc8d40a6fe ircservices-5.0.39.tar.gz
25969 844212a8718d37adac2c11fc5390b661 ircservices-5.0.39.diff.gz
25970 3fe1aa03737b2727e80693c55683dd51 ircservices-5.0.39-1.i386.rpm
25971 f04384bcbc7a4c28c9cf5fe70a6530fd ircservices_5.0.39-1_i386.deb
25972
25973 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
25974
25975 This release fixes the issue with readonly not applying to some
25976 commands (note that the relevant "temporarily disabled" messages haven't
25977 been translated yet--that'll go in the next release). I had planned to
25978 wait for more information on the recently-reported segfault first, but
25979 since the readonly issue is a current problem, I've gone ahead with this
25980 release.
25981
25982 Changes in version 5.0.39
25983 -------------------------
25984 2004/09/05 Fixed bug allowing some NickServ/ChanServ commands to be
25985 used even in read-only mode. Reported by Craig McLure
25986 <Craig@chatspike.net>
25987 2004/09/02 Fixed minor formatting errors in language files.
25988 2004/09/02 Fixed bugs in SMTP handling. Reported by Gregg Conklin
25989 <greco@gate.net>
25990 2004/08/24 Fixed a trivial error in the modules/protocol Makefile.
25991
25992 --Andrew Church
25993 achurch@achurch.org
25994 http://achurch.org/
25995
25996
25997 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Sep 4 22:44:27 2004
25998 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
25999 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26000 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.39 released
26001 Message-ID: <mailman.82.1098597733.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26002
26003 I cant get services to start,
26004
26005 [Sep 05 06:40:53 2004] IRC Services 5.0.39 starting up
26006 [Sep 05 06:40:53 2004] modules: Unable to load module `nickserv/autojoin': /usr/home/ircservices/serv/lib/modules/nickserv/autojoin.so: Undefined symbol "s_ChanServ"
26007 [Sep 05 06:40:53 2004] Error loading modules, aborting
26008
26009 I performed a make clean, make distclean (for the most part, it returned an error and bailed:
26010 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/ircservices/ircservices-5.0.0/tools'
26011 rm -f config.cache config.h* configure.log conf-tmp Makefile.inc* \
26012 langstrs.h version.c
26013 rm: conf-tmp: is a directory
26014 gmake: *** [distclean] Error 1)
26015
26016 Thanks.
26017
26018 /****************************************
26019 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26020 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26021 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26022 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26023 ****************************************/
26024
26025
26026 /****************************************
26027 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
26028 * To - services <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26029 * Sent - 13:01:42 @ 2004-09-05
26030 * Subject - [IRCServices] Services 5.0.39 released
26031 ****************************************/
26032
26033 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
26034
26035 > Services 5.0.39 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
26036 >
26037 >ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
26038 >
26039 >05926ecf0ba8ad3fdc163cbc8d40a6fe ircservices-5.0.39.tar.gz
26040 >844212a8718d37adac2c11fc5390b661 ircservices-5.0.39.diff.gz
26041 >3fe1aa03737b2727e80693c55683dd51 ircservices-5.0.39-1.i386.rpm
26042 >f04384bcbc7a4c28c9cf5fe70a6530fd ircservices_5.0.39-1_i386.deb
26043 >
26044 >ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
26045 >
26046 > This release fixes the issue with readonly not applying to some
26047 >commands (note that the relevant "temporarily disabled" messages haven't
26048 >been translated yet--that'll go in the next release). I had planned to
26049 >wait for more information on the recently-reported segfault first, but
26050 >since the readonly issue is a current problem, I've gone ahead with this
26051 >release.
26052 >
26053 >Changes in version 5.0.39
26054 >-------------------------
26055 >2004/09/05 Fixed bug allowing some NickServ/ChanServ commands to be
26056 > used even in read-only mode. Reported by Craig McLure
26057 > <Craig@chatspike.net>
26058 >2004/09/02 Fixed minor formatting errors in language files.
26059 >2004/09/02 Fixed bugs in SMTP handling. Reported by Gregg Conklin
26060 > <greco@gate.net>
26061 >2004/08/24 Fixed a trivial error in the modules/protocol Makefile.
26062 >
26063 > --Andrew Church
26064 > achurch@achurch.org
26065 > http://achurch.org/
26066 >
26067 >------------------------------------------------------------------
26068 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26069 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26070 >.
26071
26072 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
26073
26074
26075
26076
26077 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Sep 4 22:55:53 2004
26078 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
26079 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26080 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.39 released
26081 Message-ID: <mailman.83.1098597733.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26082
26083 I spotted the Problem, In the patch, both the additions to autojoin.c were bad:
26084
26085 } else if (stricmp(cmd, "ADD") == 0) {
26086 + if (readonly) {
26087 + notice_lang(s_ChanServ, u, NICK_AJOIN_DISABLED);
26088 + return;
26089 + }
26090
26091 } else if (stricmp(cmd, "DEL") == 0) {
26092 + if (readonly) {
26093 + notice_lang(s_ChanServ, u, NICK_AJOIN_DISABLED);
26094 + return;
26095 + }
26096
26097 I get the feeling its supposed to me s_NickServ that sends that message..
26098 Thanks for the patch though :)
26099
26100 /****************************************
26101 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26102 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26103 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26104 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26105 ****************************************/
26106
26107
26108 /****************************************
26109 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
26110 * To - services <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26111 * Sent - 13:01:42 @ 2004-09-05
26112 * Subject - [IRCServices] Services 5.0.39 released
26113 ****************************************/
26114
26115 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
26116
26117 > Services 5.0.39 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
26118 >
26119 >ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
26120 >
26121 >05926ecf0ba8ad3fdc163cbc8d40a6fe ircservices-5.0.39.tar.gz
26122 >844212a8718d37adac2c11fc5390b661 ircservices-5.0.39.diff.gz
26123 >3fe1aa03737b2727e80693c55683dd51 ircservices-5.0.39-1.i386.rpm
26124 >f04384bcbc7a4c28c9cf5fe70a6530fd ircservices_5.0.39-1_i386.deb
26125 >
26126 >ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
26127 >
26128 > This release fixes the issue with readonly not applying to some
26129 >commands (note that the relevant "temporarily disabled" messages haven't
26130 >been translated yet--that'll go in the next release). I had planned to
26131 >wait for more information on the recently-reported segfault first, but
26132 >since the readonly issue is a current problem, I've gone ahead with this
26133 >release.
26134 >
26135 >Changes in version 5.0.39
26136 >-------------------------
26137 >2004/09/05 Fixed bug allowing some NickServ/ChanServ commands to be
26138 > used even in read-only mode. Reported by Craig McLure
26139 > <Craig@chatspike.net>
26140 >2004/09/02 Fixed minor formatting errors in language files.
26141 >2004/09/02 Fixed bugs in SMTP handling. Reported by Gregg Conklin
26142 > <greco@gate.net>
26143 >2004/08/24 Fixed a trivial error in the modules/protocol Makefile.
26144 >
26145 > --Andrew Church
26146 > achurch@achurch.org
26147 > http://achurch.org/
26148 >
26149 >------------------------------------------------------------------
26150 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26151 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26152 >.
26153
26154 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
26155
26156
26157
26158
26159 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 5 15:20:51 2004
26160 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
26161 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26162 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.40 released
26163 Message-ID: <413ab320.52071@achurch.org>
26164
26165 Services 5.0.40 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
26166
26167 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
26168
26169 72fb16879869b2d42d20178aca58ba50 ircservices-5.0.40.tar.gz
26170 69836efbcf41f6189651cc4401784323 ircservices-5.0.40.diff.gz
26171 5c7904b39934b935034699002976f3d2 ircservices-5.0.40-1.i386.rpm
26172 5d9e2dfc46e9d7fbf00fe8d8d6d15a4c ircservices_5.0.40-1_i386.deb
26173
26174 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
26175
26176 Looks like Craig caught this one just as I was recompiling...
26177 apologies for the careless error.
26178
26179 Changes in version 5.0.40
26180 -------------------------
26181 2004/09/05 Fixed careless bug in autojoin module.
26182
26183 --Andrew Church
26184 achurch@achurch.org
26185 http://achurch.org/
26186
26187
26188 From dima at pservers.dyn.ee Fri Sep 17 13:09:10 2004
26189 From: dima at pservers.dyn.ee (Freamer)
26190 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26191 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with chanserv opping
26192 Message-ID: <003f01c49cf2$39d6e5a0$2001a8c0@freamer>
26193
26194 Im running last bahamut ircd and 5.0.0 services , all seems to work fine but , chanserv doesnt op anyone who is written to autoop on it , it dont op founder too , is it a kind of a bug? anybody knows how to deal with it ?
26195 -------------- next part --------------
26196 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
26197 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040917/3afc098f/attachment.html
26198 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Sat Sep 18 12:23:42 2004
26199 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
26200 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26201 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with chanserv opping
26202 Message-ID: <20040918192342.70755.qmail@web53104.mail.yahoo.com>
26203
26204 5.0.0 is an extremely old with many bugs version of
26205 ircservices. Please upgrade ASAP.
26206
26207 =====
26208 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
26209
26210
26211 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Sun Sep 19 02:29:40 2004
26212 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
26213 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26214 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: Problem with chanserv opping
26215 In-Reply-To: <200409181001.i8IA1Dng004703@mx1.wm.co.za>
26216 Message-ID: <web-446063586@mail01.infosat.net>
26217
26218 You mentioned that you're running 5.0.0 - try upgrading to
26219 5.0.40 (the latest version) and see if it's solved there.
26220 _____________________________________________________________________
26221 For super low premiums ,click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
26222
26223
26224 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu Sep 30 07:42:37 2004
26225 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
26226 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26227 Subject: [IRCServices] Test
26228 Message-ID: <mailman.84.1098597733.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26229
26230 Sorry if you get this, this list has been vewwy qwiet over the last 11 days, was just making sure it all works properly :)
26231
26232
26233 /****************************************
26234 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26235 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26236 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26237 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26238 ****************************************/
26239
26240
26241
26242 From nick.martini at gmail.com Thu Sep 30 10:11:40 2004
26243 From: nick.martini at gmail.com (nick martini)
26244 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26245 Subject: [IRCServices] Test
26246 In-Reply-To: <-7393229003219304257@unknownmsgid>
26247 References: <-7393229003219304257@unknownmsgid>
26248 Message-ID: <ee1a43f404093010116ba936c5@mail.gmail.com>
26249
26250 thanks.
26251
26252
26253 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:42:37 +0100, Craig McLure
26254 <craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
26255 > Sorry if you get this, this list has been vewwy qwiet over the last 11 days, was just making sure it all works properly :)
26256 >
26257 > /****************************************
26258 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26259 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26260 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26261 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26262 > ****************************************/
26263 >
26264 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
26265 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26266 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26267 >
26268
26269
26270 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Sep 30 10:16:40 2004
26271 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
26272 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26273 Subject: [IRCServices] Test
26274 Message-ID: <E1CD5ZI-0004fV-6R@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
26275
26276 this is a test of replying to your test. test test test.
26277
26278 <insert echo here>
26279
26280 >Sorry if you get this, this list has been vewwy qwiet over the last 11 days, was just making sure it all works properly :)
26281
26282 >
26283 >/****************************************
26284 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26285 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26286 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26287 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26288 > ****************************************/
26289 >
26290 >
26291 >------------------------------------------------------------------
26292 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26293 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26294 >
26295
26296
26297
26298 From mark at phedny.net Thu Sep 30 10:19:11 2004
26299 From: mark at phedny.net (M. van Cuijk)
26300 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26301 Subject: [IRCServices] Test
26302 In-Reply-To: <E1CD5ZI-0004fV-6R@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
26303 References: <E1CD5ZI-0004fV-6R@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
26304 Message-ID: <415C400F.8030107@phedny.net>
26305
26306
26307 Craig Edwards wrote:
26308
26309 >this is a test of replying to your test. test test test.
26310 >
26311 ><insert echo here>
26312 >
26313 >
26314 echo
26315
26316 >
26317 >
26318 >>Sorry if you get this, this list has been vewwy qwiet over the last 11 days, was just making sure it all works properly :)\1c
26319 >>
26320 >>/****************************************
26321 >>* Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26322 >>* Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26323 >>* InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26324 >>* ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26325 >>****************************************/
26326 >>
26327 >>
26328 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
26329 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26330 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26331 >>
26332 >>
26333 >>
26334 >
26335 >
26336 >------------------------------------------------------------------
26337 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26338 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26339 >
26340 >
26341 >
26342 -------------- next part --------------
26343 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
26344 Name: smime.p7s
26345 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
26346 Size: 2981 bytes
26347 Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
26348 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20040930/bdf673f1/smime.bin
26349 From nick.martini at gmail.com Thu Sep 30 11:28:57 2004
26350 From: nick.martini at gmail.com (nick martini)
26351 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26352 Subject: [IRCServices] Test
26353 In-Reply-To: <415C400F.8030107@phedny.net>
26354 References: <E1CD5ZI-0004fV-6R@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
26355 <415C400F.8030107@phedny.net>
26356 Message-ID: <ee1a43f4040930112845522e58@mail.gmail.com>
26357
26358 wow shut up
26359
26360
26361 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:19:11 +0200, M. van Cuijk <mark@phedny.net> wrote:
26362 >
26363 > Craig Edwards wrote:
26364 >
26365 > >this is a test of replying to your test. test test test.
26366 > >
26367 > ><insert echo here>
26368 > >
26369 > >
26370 > echo
26371 >
26372 >
26373 >
26374 > >
26375 > >
26376 > >>Sorry if you get this, this list has been vewwy qwiet over the last 11 days, was just making sure it all works properly :)
26377 > >>
26378 > >>/****************************************
26379 > >>* Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26380 > >>* Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26381 > >>* InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26382 > >>* ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26383 > >>****************************************/
26384 > >>
26385 > >>
26386 > >>------------------------------------------------------------------
26387 > >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26388 > >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26389 > >>
26390 > >>
26391 > >>
26392 > >
26393 > >
26394 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
26395 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26396 > >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26397 > >
26398 > >
26399 > >
26400 >
26401 >
26402 >
26403 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
26404 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26405 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26406 >
26407 >
26408 >
26409 >
26410 >
26411
26412
26413 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Fri Oct 1 07:35:31 2004
26414 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
26415 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26416 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: test
26417 In-Reply-To: <200410011001.i91A0vng024851@mx1.wm.co.za>
26418 Message-ID: <web-459709872@mail01.infosat.net>
26419
26420 Echo. LOL.
26421 _____________________________________________________________________
26422 For super low premiums ,click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
26423
26424
26425 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Oct 2 07:59:43 2004
26426 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
26427 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26428 Subject: [IRCServices] Sockets Module..
26429 Message-ID: <mailman.85.1098597733.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26430
26431 A few months ago, someone sent me a module which was basically a partline using services socket functions. If it could be possible, could that person re-send me the module? i don't know who it was, which is why i am sending this e-mail here.
26432
26433 Thanks in advance
26434
26435 /****************************************
26436 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26437 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26438 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26439 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26440 ****************************************/
26441
26442
26443
26444 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Oct 3 11:11:00 2004
26445 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
26446 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26447 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.41 released
26448 Message-ID: <415f60a6.47322@achurch.org>
26449
26450 Services 5.0.41 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
26451
26452 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
26453
26454 a470ec4a783d27ce1027ae37419a0517 ircservices-5.0.41.tar.gz
26455 23d56a62c2b37db3d937dc42716a11ca ircservices-5.0.41.diff.gz
26456 86f50e784f9741b2306019039c3c40e2 ircservices-5.0.41-1.i386.rpm
26457 ea5cf23aa1996ccb472528da514b47f2 ircservices_5.0.41-1_i386.deb
26458
26459 ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
26460
26461 This is a maintenance release which includes fixes for bugs reported
26462 recently (except for the "EXCEPTION DEL crash" report, which I haven't
26463 received any more information about and am unable to investigate further).
26464
26465 Changes in version 5.0.41
26466 -------------------------
26467 2004/10/03 Fixed SQUIT of juped servers on Bahamut. Reported by Pasi
26468 Hirvonen <psh@iki.fi>
26469 2004/10/03 Fixed cosmetic bug in NickServ SUSPEND help. Reported by
26470 Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
26471 2004/10/02 Fixed bug causing endless log messages on full network
26472 buffer. Reported by <ballsy@mystical.net>
26473 2004/10/02 OperServ AKILLCHAN now honors the WallOSAkill setting.
26474 Reported by Pasi Hirvonen <psh@iki.fi>
26475 2004/09/19 Fixed missing object file in Hybrid module compilation.
26476 Reported by Jon Christopherson <jon@layertek.com>
26477
26478 --Andrew Church
26479 achurch@achurch.org
26480 http://achurch.org/
26481
26482
26483 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Oct 2 19:26:58 2004
26484 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
26485 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26486 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.41 released
26487 Message-ID: <mailman.86.1098597733.26050.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26488
26489 Quick note..
26490
26491 cd ../.. && gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log -I. -c modules/nickserv/main.c -o modules/nickserv/main.o
26492 modules/nickserv/main.c: In function `init_module':
26493 modules/nickserv/main.c:1813: warning: unused variable `cmd'
26494
26495
26496 /****************************************
26497 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26498 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26499 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26500 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26501 ****************************************/
26502
26503
26504 /****************************************
26505 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
26506 * To - services <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26507 * Sent - 11:11:00 @ 2004-10-03
26508 * Subject - [IRCServices] Services 5.0.41 released
26509 ****************************************/
26510
26511 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
26512
26513 > Services 5.0.41 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
26514 >
26515 >ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
26516 >
26517 >a470ec4a783d27ce1027ae37419a0517 ircservices-5.0.41.tar.gz
26518 >23d56a62c2b37db3d937dc42716a11ca ircservices-5.0.41.diff.gz
26519 >86f50e784f9741b2306019039c3c40e2 ircservices-5.0.41-1.i386.rpm
26520 >ea5cf23aa1996ccb472528da514b47f2 ircservices_5.0.41-1_i386.deb
26521 >
26522 >ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
26523 >
26524 > This is a maintenance release which includes fixes for bugs reported
26525 >recently (except for the "EXCEPTION DEL crash" report, which I haven't
26526 >received any more information about and am unable to investigate further).
26527 >
26528 >Changes in version 5.0.41
26529 >-------------------------
26530 >2004/10/03 Fixed SQUIT of juped servers on Bahamut. Reported by Pasi
26531 > Hirvonen <psh@iki.fi>
26532 >2004/10/03 Fixed cosmetic bug in NickServ SUSPEND help. Reported by
26533 > Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
26534 >2004/10/02 Fixed bug causing endless log messages on full network
26535 > buffer. Reported by <ballsy@mystical.net>
26536 >2004/10/02 OperServ AKILLCHAN now honors the WallOSAkill setting.
26537 > Reported by Pasi Hirvonen <psh@iki.fi>
26538 >2004/09/19 Fixed missing object file in Hybrid module compilation.
26539 > Reported by Jon Christopherson <jon@layertek.com>
26540 >
26541 > --Andrew Church
26542 > achurch@achurch.org
26543 > http://achurch.org/
26544 >
26545 >------------------------------------------------------------------
26546 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26547 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26548
26549 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
26550
26551
26552
26553 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Oct 3 12:08:48 2004
26554 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
26555 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26556 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.41 released
26557 In-Reply-To: <415f63c6.36630@mail.achurch.org>
26558 Message-ID: <415f6d5e.47412@achurch.org>
26559
26560 >Quick note..
26561 >
26562 >cd ../.. && gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log -I. -c modules/nickserv/main.c -o modules/nickserv/main.o
26563 >modules/nickserv/main.c: In function `init_module':
26564 >modules/nickserv/main.c:1813: warning: unused variable `cmd'
26565
26566 Thanks, I missed that. Will fix for the next release.
26567
26568 --Andrew Church
26569 achurch@achurch.org
26570 http://achurch.org/
26571
26572 >
26573 >/****************************************
26574 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
26575 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
26576 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
26577 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
26578 > ****************************************/
26579 >
26580 >
26581 >/****************************************
26582 > * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
26583 > * To - services <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
26584 > * Sent - 11:11:00 @ 2004-10-03
26585 > * Subject - [IRCServices] Services 5.0.41 released
26586 > ****************************************/
26587 >
26588 >/****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
26589 >
26590 >> Services 5.0.41 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
26591 >>
26592 >>ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
26593 >>
26594 >>a470ec4a783d27ce1027ae37419a0517 ircservices-5.0.41.tar.gz
26595 >>23d56a62c2b37db3d937dc42716a11ca ircservices-5.0.41.diff.gz
26596 >>86f50e784f9741b2306019039c3c40e2 ircservices-5.0.41-1.i386.rpm
26597 >>ea5cf23aa1996ccb472528da514b47f2 ircservices_5.0.41-1_i386.deb
26598 >>
26599 >>ftp.ircservices.za.net and the other mirrors should have it shortly.
26600 >>
26601 >> This is a maintenance release which includes fixes for bugs reported
26602 >>recently (except for the "EXCEPTION DEL crash" report, which I haven't
26603 >>received any more information about and am unable to investigate further).
26604 >>
26605 >>Changes in version 5.0.41
26606 >>-------------------------
26607 >>2004/10/03 Fixed SQUIT of juped servers on Bahamut. Reported by Pasi
26608 >> Hirvonen <psh@iki.fi>
26609 >>2004/10/03 Fixed cosmetic bug in NickServ SUSPEND help. Reported by
26610 >> Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
26611 >>2004/10/02 Fixed bug causing endless log messages on full network
26612 >> buffer. Reported by <ballsy@mystical.net>
26613 >>2004/10/02 OperServ AKILLCHAN now honors the WallOSAkill setting.
26614 >> Reported by Pasi Hirvonen <psh@iki.fi>
26615 >>2004/09/19 Fixed missing object file in Hybrid module compilation.
26616 >> Reported by Jon Christopherson <jon@layertek.com>
26617 >>
26618 >> --Andrew Church
26619 >> achurch@achurch.org
26620 >> http://achurch.org/
26621 >>
26622 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
26623 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26624 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26625 >
26626 >/******* - End Original Message - *******/
26627 >
26628 >
26629 >------------------------------------------------------------------
26630 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26631 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26632
26633
26634 From liverbugg at rinux.org Tue Oct 5 18:50:24 2004
26635 From: liverbugg at rinux.org (Liverbugg)
26636 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26637 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault on Opteron (64-bit) Linux
26638 Message-ID: <41634F60.3060703@rinux.org>
26639
26640 I'm trying to run ircservices on a dual opteron server and I'm getting
26641 segfaults. I've tried 5.0.31, 5.0.38, and 5.0.41 over the last few
26642 months and just had enough time recently to try to debug. The computer
26643 is a dual Opteron 242 running Gentoo Linux. The server I'm trying to
26644 link to is Unrealircd-3.2 running on the same machine. Ircservices runs
26645 fine with the same config linking to the same server if I run it on a
26646 32bit x86 machine.
26647
26648 The compile has lots of warnings that I don't see on a 32bit machine like:
26649
26650 modules/statserv/main.c:127: warning: cast from pointer to integer of
26651 different size
26652 modules/statserv/main.c:127: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
26653 different size
26654
26655 This is what I see in the the log when running ircservices -debug:
26656
26657 [Oct 04 20:36:13.560828 2004] IRC Services 5.0.41 starting up (options:
26658 debug)
26659 [Oct 04 20:36:13.560991 2004] debug: Loading language 0 from file
26660 `languages/en_us'
26661 .....unimportant stuff cut.....
26662 [Oct 04 20:36:13.578803 2004] debug: Sent: NICK HelpServ 1 1096936573
26663 services lanchelms.com services.lanchelms 0 +Sqd lanchelms.com :Help Server
26664 [Oct 04 20:36:13.578835 2004] debug: Received: :squall.local NOTICE AUTH
26665 :*** Looking up your hostname...
26666 [Oct 04 20:36:32.983294 2004]
26667
26668 If I run it with ircservices -debug -nofork all I see in the log is this
26669 (this is from 2 tries):
26670
26671 [Oct 04 19:59:43 2004] [Oct 04 20:04:50 2004]
26672
26673 If I run it with no parameters the server sees services come on line but
26674 die right away:
26675
26676 -squall.local- *** Notice -- (link) Link squall.local ->
26677 services.lanchelms[@127.0.0.1.6677] established
26678 -squall.local- Lost connection to
26679 services.lanchelms[127.0.0.1]:Connection reset by peer
26680
26681 but if I run it with -nofork the server never sees the connection
26682
26683 There is no core generated, even when I compiled with ./configure
26684 -dumpcore -cflags -g -defaults, but here is what gdb shows when running
26685 ircservices in it with -nofork -debug:
26686
26687 Squall bin # gdb ./ircservices
26688 GNU gdb 6.2
26689 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
26690 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
26691 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
26692 conditions.
26693 Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
26694 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
26695 This GDB was configured as "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"...Using host
26696 libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
26697
26698 Starting program: /opt/ircservices/bin/ircservices -nofork -debug
26699 warning: Unable to find dynamic linker breakpoint function.
26700 GDB will be unable to debug shared library initializers
26701 and track explicitly loaded dynamic code.
26702
26703 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
26704 0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26705 (gdb) bt
26706 #0 0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26707 #1 0x0000002a956aca46 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26708 #2 0x0000002a956ae4f9 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26709 #3 0x0000002a956aa34a in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26710 #4 0x000000000040bf28 in vlogprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s", args=0x7fbffff070)
26711 at log.c:123
26712 #5 0x000000000040bff7 in logprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s") at log.c:131
26713 #6 0x000000000040c018 in logputs (
26714 str=0x7fbffff1a0 "[Oct 05 19:56:41.285530 2004] ") at log.c:137
26715 #7 0x000000000040c163 in write_time () at log.c:167
26716 #8 0x000000000040c46a in log (
26717 fmt=0x47d8f0 "IRC Services %s starting up (options:%s%s%s)") at
26718 log.c:287
26719 #9 0x00000000004097c7 in init (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568) at init.c:756
26720 #10 0x000000000040cf78 in main (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568, envp=0x7fbffff588)
26721 at main.c:225
26722 (gdb)
26723
26724 Let me know if theres any other info you need or if you want access to
26725 the machine to debug.
26726
26727 Thanks,
26728
26729 - Matt
26730
26731
26732 From ziggy at darkrealmz.net Tue Oct 5 21:28:28 2004
26733 From: ziggy at darkrealmz.net (Juston Griggs)
26734 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26735 Subject: [IRCServices] Problems configureing the httpd
26736 Message-ID: <000001c4ab5c$ff790a40$6401a8c0@juston27bwcj0x>
26737
26738 If anyone can help me configure the httpd for my network it would be
26739 greatly appreciated. This is my first time using IRC Services, I?ve been
26740 using Epona & Anope in the past. I Changed for the fact that IRC
26741 Services offers more of what im looking for, so if anyone can help me
26742 configure the httpd I?d be very happy :-)
26743
26744 [ziggy]
26745
26746 ---
26747 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
26748 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
26749 Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 9/28/2004
26750
26751 -------------- next part --------------
26752 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
26753 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20041006/d37d1915/attachment.html
26754 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Oct 11 16:53:35 2004
26755 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
26756 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26757 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault on Opteron (64-bit) Linux
26758 In-Reply-To: <41634F60.3060703@rinux.org>
26759 Message-ID: <416a3d57.51067@achurch.org>
26760
26761 >I'm trying to run ircservices on a dual opteron server and I'm getting
26762 >segfaults. I've tried 5.0.31, 5.0.38, and 5.0.41 over the last few
26763 >months and just had enough time recently to try to debug. The computer
26764 >is a dual Opteron 242 running Gentoo Linux.
26765
26766 The most likely cause is that Services isn't compatible with 64-bit
26767 processors, though to the best of my knowledge there shouldn't be any
26768 issues (the warnings are harmless, unless the compiler is screwy).
26769 Except...
26770
26771 >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
26772 >0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26773 >(gdb) bt
26774 >#0 0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26775 >#1 0x0000002a956aca46 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26776 >#2 0x0000002a956ae4f9 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26777 >#3 0x0000002a956aa34a in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26778 >#4 0x000000000040bf28 in vlogprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s", args=0x7fbffff070)
26779 > at log.c:123
26780 >#5 0x000000000040bff7 in logprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s") at log.c:131
26781 >#6 0x000000000040c018 in logputs (
26782 > str=0x7fbffff1a0 "[Oct 05 19:56:41.285530 2004] ") at log.c:137
26783 >#7 0x000000000040c163 in write_time () at log.c:167
26784 >#8 0x000000000040c46a in log (
26785 > fmt=0x47d8f0 "IRC Services %s starting up (options:%s%s%s)") at
26786 >log.c:287
26787 >#9 0x00000000004097c7 in init (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568) at init.c:756
26788 >#10 0x000000000040cf78 in main (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568, envp=0x7fbffff588)
26789 > at main.c:225
26790
26791 This is puzzling; my gut instinct is to say that your libraries are
26792 broken.
26793
26794 >Let me know if theres any other info you need or if you want access to
26795 >the machine to debug.
26796
26797 Access to the machine would be appreciated--I don't have any 64-bit
26798 machines handy.
26799
26800 --Andrew Church
26801 achurch@achurch.org
26802 http://achurch.org/
26803
26804
26805 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Oct 11 17:07:05 2004
26806 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
26807 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26808 Subject: [IRCServices] Problems configureing the httpd
26809 In-Reply-To: <000001c4ab5c$ff790a40$6401a8c0@juston27bwcj0x>
26810 Message-ID: <416a3f6f.51122@achurch.org>
26811
26812 >If anyone can help me configure the httpd for my network it would be
26813 >greatly appreciated. This is my first time using IRC Services, I=92ve =
26814 >been
26815 >using Epona & Anope in the past. I Changed for the fact that IRC
26816 >Services offers more of what im looking for, so if anyone can help me
26817 >configure the httpd I=92d be very happy :-)
26818
26819 In order for anyone to help you, you'll need to give more information
26820 about your system and how you want Services to be set up. Also, please do
26821 not send HTML mail to the list.
26822
26823 --Andrew Church
26824 achurch@achurch.org
26825 http://achurch.org/
26826
26827
26828 From liverbugg at rinux.org Mon Oct 11 23:11:53 2004
26829 From: liverbugg at rinux.org (Liverbugg)
26830 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26831 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault on Opteron (64-bit) Linux
26832 In-Reply-To: <416a3d57.51067@achurch.org>
26833 References: <416a3d57.51067@achurch.org>
26834 Message-ID: <416B75A9.7000205@rinux.org>
26835
26836 Andrew Church wrote:
26837
26838 >>I'm trying to run ircservices on a dual opteron server and I'm getting
26839 >>segfaults. I've tried 5.0.31, 5.0.38, and 5.0.41 over the last few
26840 >>months and just had enough time recently to try to debug. The computer
26841 >>is a dual Opteron 242 running Gentoo Linux.
26842 >>
26843 >>
26844 >
26845 > The most likely cause is that Services isn't compatible with 64-bit
26846 >processors, though to the best of my knowledge there shouldn't be any
26847 >issues (the warnings are harmless, unless the compiler is screwy).
26848 >Except...
26849 >
26850 >
26851 >
26852 There were a few segfaults in UnrealIRCd that I discovered on this box
26853 due to 64bit incompatibilities and the devs fixed.
26854
26855 >>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
26856 >>0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26857 >>(gdb) bt
26858 >>#0 0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26859 >>#1 0x0000002a956aca46 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26860 >>#2 0x0000002a956ae4f9 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26861 >>#3 0x0000002a956aa34a in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26862 >>#4 0x000000000040bf28 in vlogprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s", args=0x7fbffff070)
26863 >> at log.c:123
26864 >>#5 0x000000000040bff7 in logprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s") at log.c:131
26865 >>#6 0x000000000040c018 in logputs (
26866 >> str=0x7fbffff1a0 "[Oct 05 19:56:41.285530 2004] ") at log.c:137
26867 >>#7 0x000000000040c163 in write_time () at log.c:167
26868 >>#8 0x000000000040c46a in log (
26869 >> fmt=0x47d8f0 "IRC Services %s starting up (options:%s%s%s)") at
26870 >>log.c:287
26871 >>#9 0x00000000004097c7 in init (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568) at init.c:756
26872 >>#10 0x000000000040cf78 in main (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568, envp=0x7fbffff588)
26873 >> at main.c:225
26874 >>
26875 >>
26876 >
26877 > This is puzzling; my gut instinct is to say that your libraries are
26878 >broken.
26879 >
26880 >
26881 >
26882 I havent had any problems with the libraries with any other software.
26883
26884 >>Let me know if theres any other info you need or if you want access to
26885 >>the machine to debug.
26886 >>
26887 >>
26888 >
26889 > Access to the machine would be appreciated--I don't have any 64-bit
26890 >machines handy.
26891 >
26892 >
26893 >
26894 I'll send you a private mail with the address and user/pw.
26895
26896 > --Andrew Church
26897 > achurch@achurch.org
26898 > http://achurch.org/
26899 >
26900 >------------------------------------------------------------------
26901 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
26902 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
26903 >
26904 >
26905
26906
26907
26908 From liverbugg at rinux.org Mon Oct 11 23:40:50 2004
26909 From: liverbugg at rinux.org (Liverbugg)
26910 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26911 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault on Opteron (64-bit) Linux
26912 In-Reply-To: <416B75A9.7000205@rinux.org>
26913 References: <416a3d57.51067@achurch.org> <416B75A9.7000205@rinux.org>
26914 Message-ID: <416B7C72.9060009@rinux.org>
26915
26916 Liverbugg wrote:
26917
26918 >>>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
26919 >>>0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26920 >>>(gdb) bt
26921 >>>#0 0x0000002a956d63d0 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
26922 >>>#1 0x0000002a956aca46 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26923 >>>#2 0x0000002a956ae4f9 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26924 >>>#3 0x0000002a956aa34a in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
26925 >>>#4 0x000000000040bf28 in vlogprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s", args=0x7fbffff070)
26926 >>> at log.c:123
26927 >>>#5 0x000000000040bff7 in logprintf (fmt=0x47e2dd "%s") at log.c:131
26928 >>>#6 0x000000000040c018 in logputs (
26929 >>> str=0x7fbffff1a0 "[Oct 05 19:56:41.285530 2004] ") at log.c:137
26930 >>>#7 0x000000000040c163 in write_time () at log.c:167
26931 >>>#8 0x000000000040c46a in log (
26932 >>> fmt=0x47d8f0 "IRC Services %s starting up (options:%s%s%s)") at
26933 >>>log.c:287
26934 >>>#9 0x00000000004097c7 in init (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568) at init.c:756
26935 >>>#10 0x000000000040cf78 in main (ac=3, av=0x7fbffff568, envp=0x7fbffff588)
26936 >>> at main.c:225
26937 >>>
26938 >>>
26939 >>>
26940 >>>
26941 >> This is puzzling; my gut instinct is to say that your libraries are
26942 >>broken.
26943 >>
26944 >>
26945 >>
26946 >>
26947 >>
26948 >I havent had any problems with the libraries with any other software.
26949 >
26950 >
26951 >
26952 I was just setting up everything to give you remote access and I found a
26953 core file and this looks a bit more useful then the last GDB output
26954
26955 Squall ircservices # gdb bin/ircservices lib/ircservices/core
26956 GNU gdb 6.2
26957 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
26958 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
26959 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
26960 conditions.
26961 Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
26962 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
26963 This GDB was configured as "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"...Using host
26964 libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
26965
26966 Core was generated by `./ircservices/bin/ircservices'.
26967 Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
26968 Reading symbols from /lib64/libc.so.6...done.
26969 Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
26970 Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...done.
26971 Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
26972 #0 0x0000002a956d7baf in strcasecmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
26973 (gdb) bt
26974 #0 0x0000002a956d7baf in strcasecmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
26975 #1 0x000000000047a1cd in do_receive_message (
26976 source=0xffffffffbffff1d0 <Address 0xffffffffbffff1d0 out of bounds>,
26977 cmd=0xffffffffbffff190 <Address 0xffffffffbffff190 out of bounds>, ac=2,
26978 av=0x71bf30) at modules/protocol/unreal.c:949
26979 #2 0x0000000000412b41 in call_callback_5 (module=0x5abaa0, id=27,
26980 arg1=0xffffffffbffff1d0, arg2=0xffffffffbffff190, arg3=0x2, arg4=0x71bf30,
26981 arg5=0x0) at modules.c:699
26982 #3 0x00000000004134d6 in process () at process.c:136
26983 #4 0x000000000040df39 in readfirstline_callback (s=0x71c1b0,
26984 param_unused=0x41) at main.c:160
26985 #5 0x00000000004164f1 in check_sockets () at sockets.c:516
26986 #6 0x000000000040e2d3 in main (ac=1, av=0x7fbffff538, envp=0x7fbffff548)
26987 at main.c:267
26988 (gdb)
26989
26990
26991
26992 From smkelly at zombie.org Mon Oct 11 23:56:37 2004
26993 From: smkelly at zombie.org (Sean Kelly)
26994 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
26995 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault on Opteron (64-bit) Linux
26996 In-Reply-To: <416B7C72.9060009@rinux.org>
26997 References: <416a3d57.51067@achurch.org> <416B75A9.7000205@rinux.org>
26998 <416B7C72.9060009@rinux.org>
26999 Message-ID: <20041012065637.GA69960@edgemaster.zombie.org>
27000
27001 On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:40:50AM -0400, Liverbugg wrote:
27002 ...
27003 > I was just setting up everything to give you remote access and I found a
27004 > core file and this looks a bit more useful then the last GDB output
27005 >
27006 > Squall ircservices # gdb bin/ircservices lib/ircservices/core
27007 ...
27008 > (gdb) bt
27009
27010 You might consider a 'bt full'. That will show local variables and likely
27011 be a lot more helpful.
27012
27013 --
27014 Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
27015 smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org
27016
27017
27018 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Oct 12 16:12:01 2004
27019 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
27020 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27021 Subject: [IRCServices] Temporary web and mailing list disruption
27022 Message-ID: <416b85be.61534@achurch.org>
27023
27024 Just a quick heads-up: in the near future (date not yet determined,
27025 but sometime this month), the IRC Services web site and mailing lists will
27026 be moving to a new server. I'll be working with the current and new server
27027 admins to keep downtime to a minimum, but particularly as regards the
27028 mailing lists, there may be a period during which messages to the lists are
27029 rejected or not archived.
27030
27031 Also, once the move is complete ftp.ircservices.za.net will no longer
27032 function; the files will instead be available via HTTP
27033 (http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ is the expected URL). For those
27034 mirroring ftp.ircservices.za.net, please contact me if you cannot mirror
27035 from an HTTP source.
27036
27037 --Andrew Church
27038 achurch@achurch.org
27039 http://achurch.org/
27040
27041
27042 From liverbugg at rinux.org Tue Oct 12 00:29:41 2004
27043 From: liverbugg at rinux.org (Liverbugg)
27044 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27045 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault on Opteron (64-bit) Linux
27046 In-Reply-To: <20041012065637.GA69960@edgemaster.zombie.org>
27047 References: <416a3d57.51067@achurch.org> <416B75A9.7000205@rinux.org>
27048 <416B7C72.9060009@rinux.org>
27049 <20041012065637.GA69960@edgemaster.zombie.org>
27050 Message-ID: <416B87E5.8080401@rinux.org>
27051
27052 Sean Kelly wrote:
27053
27054 >On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:40:50AM -0400, Liverbugg wrote:
27055 >...
27056 >
27057 >
27058 >>I was just setting up everything to give you remote access and I found a
27059 >>core file and this looks a bit more useful then the last GDB output
27060 >>
27061 >>Squall ircservices # gdb bin/ircservices lib/ircservices/core
27062 >>
27063 >>
27064 >...
27065 >
27066 >
27067 >>(gdb) bt
27068 >>
27069 >>
27070 >
27071 >You might consider a 'bt full'. That will show local variables and likely
27072 >be a lot more helpful.
27073 >
27074 >
27075 >
27076 Don't know if this is going to get mangled by my client...
27077
27078 (gdb) bt full
27079 #0 0x0000002a956d7baf in strcasecmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
27080 No symbol table info available.
27081 #1 0x000000000047a1cd in do_receive_message (
27082 source=0xffffffffbffff1d0 <Address 0xffffffffbffff1d0 out of bounds>,
27083 cmd=0xffffffffbffff190 <Address 0xffffffffbffff190 out of bounds>,
27084 ac=2,
27085 av=0x71bf30) at modules/protocol/unreal.c:949
27086 No locals.
27087 #2 0x0000000000412b41 in call_callback_5 (module=0x5abaa0, id=27,
27088 arg1=0xffffffffbffff1d0, arg2=0xffffffffbffff190, arg3=0x2,
27089 arg4=0x71bf30,
27090 arg5=0x0) at modules.c:699
27091 cl = (CallbackList *) 0x676bd0
27092 res = 0
27093 i = 0
27094 #3 0x00000000004134d6 in process () at process.c:136
27095 source = "irc.lanchelms.com", '\0' <repeats 39 times>,
27096 "????\005\000\000"
27097 cmd = "NOTICE\000\000\223?F\000\000\000\000\000P???\003", '\0'
27098 <repeats 11 times>, " ???\177\000\000\000A+A\000\000\000\000\000
27099 \207\\\000\000\000\000\000 ?Z\000\000\000\000"
27100 buf = "NOTICE\000AUTH\000\000*** Looking up your
27101 hostname...\000p your
27102 hostname...\000\000???\177\000\000\000?8A\000\000\000\000\000\002\000??\177\000\000\000v8A\000\000\000\000\0000\000\000\0000\000\000\000\b???\177\000\000\000
27103 ???\177\000\000\000??g\225*\000\000\000\230hI", '\0' <repeats 13 times>,
27104 "\003\000\
27105 000\000\000\000\000\000
27106 `\207\225*\000\000\000@?q\000\000\000\000\000?vkA\000\000\000\000?Sg\000\000\000\000\000?Sg\000\000\000\000\000\000\001?\t\000\000\000\000_\031@"...
27107 s = 0x7fbfffef97 "AUTH"
27108 ac = 2
27109 av = (char **) 0x71bf30
27110 #4 0x000000000040df39 in readfirstline_callback (s=0x71c1b0,
27111 param_unused=0x41) at main.c:160
27112 No locals.
27113 #5 0x00000000004164f1 in check_sockets () at sockets.c:516
27114 newline = 0x71c950 "\n"
27115 left = 65
27116 newleft = 65
27117 rfds = {fds_bits = {1, 0 <repeats 15 times>}}
27118 wfds = {fds_bits = {0 <repeats 16 times>}}
27119 tv = {tv_sec = 2, tv_usec = 999000}
27120 i = 0
27121 res = 65
27122 s = (Socket *) 0x71c1b0
27123 s2 = (Socket *) 0x0
27124 #6 0x000000000040e2d3 in main (ac=1, av=0x7fbffff538, envp=0x7fbffff548)
27125 at main.c:267
27126 now = 1097561790
27127 now_msec = -1949837413
27128 last_update = 1097561790
27129 last_check = 2345129883
27130 (gdb)
27131
27132
27133
27134
27135 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Oct 12 17:11:44 2004
27136 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
27137 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27138 Subject: [IRCServices] Segfault on Opteron (64-bit) Linux
27139 In-Reply-To: <416B87E5.8080401@rinux.org>
27140 Message-ID: <416b92da.63264@achurch.org>
27141
27142 >#2 0x0000000000412b41 in call_callback_5 (module=0x5abaa0, id=27,
27143 > arg1=0xffffffffbffff1d0, arg2=0xffffffffbffff190, arg3=0x2,
27144 >arg4=0x71bf30,
27145 > arg5=0x0) at modules.c:699
27146 > cl = (CallbackList *) 0x676bd0
27147 > res = 0
27148 > i = 0
27149 >#3 0x00000000004134d6 in process () at process.c:136
27150 [...]
27151 > s = 0x7fbfffef97 "AUTH"
27152
27153 Okay, I think I see what's going on--the 64-bit pointers are getting
27154 clipped to 32 bits in the process of calling callback functions. I'll
27155 check more thoroughly later on, but you may need to wait for the 5.1 alpha
27156 releases (hopefully by the end of the year) for a fix.
27157
27158 --Andrew Church
27159 achurch@achurch.org
27160 http://achurch.org/
27161
27162
27163 From wolf_wgd at adelphia.net Thu Oct 14 00:07:56 2004
27164 From: wolf_wgd at adelphia.net (Wolf-WGD)
27165 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27166 Subject: [IRCServices] Iis there a " live Dierctory" ???
27167 Message-ID: <416E25CC.508@adelphia.net>
27168
27169 a simple question, " Since i'm using UnrealIRCd 3.2 on red hat Lynux,
27170 is there a Live Directory that I can list my server to??? If so where
27171
27172 Wolf my thanks
27173
27174
27175
27176
27177 From Dutch_computer_freak at hotmail.com Thu Oct 14 02:28:33 2004
27178 From: Dutch_computer_freak at hotmail.com (Jeroen van den Berg)
27179 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27180 Subject: [IRCServices] Iis there a " live Dierctory" ???
27181 In-Reply-To: <416E25CC.508@adelphia.net>
27182 Message-ID: <BAY9-DAV4mbsskpHEbg00002dd9@hotmail.com>
27183
27184 www.searchirc.com ??????
27185
27186 -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
27187 Van: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net
27188 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.za.net] Namens Wolf-WGD
27189 Verzonden: donderdag 14 oktober 2004 9:08
27190 Aan: ircservices@ircservices.za.net
27191 Onderwerp: [IRCServices] Iis there a " live Dierctory" ???
27192
27193 a simple question, " Since i'm using UnrealIRCd 3.2 on red hat Lynux,
27194 is there a Live Directory that I can list my server to??? If so where
27195
27196 Wolf my thanks
27197
27198
27199
27200 ------------------------------------------------------------------
27201 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27202 http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27203
27204
27205 From wolf_wgd at adelphia.net Thu Oct 14 09:23:19 2004
27206 From: wolf_wgd at adelphia.net (Wolf-WGD)
27207 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27208 Subject: [IRCServices] Is there a LIVE Dierctory????
27209 Message-ID: <416EA7F7.7020309@adelphia.net>
27210
27211 a simple question, " Since i'm using UnrealIRCd 3.2 on red hat Lynux,
27212 is there a Live Directory that I can list my server to??? If so where
27213
27214 Wolf my thanks
27215
27216
27217
27218
27219
27220
27221
27222
27223
27224
27225
27226 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Thu Oct 14 09:44:50 2004
27227 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
27228 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27229 Subject: [IRCServices] Is there a LIVE Dierctory????
27230 References: <416EA7F7.7020309@adelphia.net>
27231 Message-ID: <000b01c4b20d$1ff5fbf0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
27232
27233 A better question would be, why are u asking this in the IRC Services
27234 mailing list?
27235
27236 ----- Original Message -----
27237 From: "Wolf-WGD" <wolf_wgd@adelphia.net>
27238 To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
27239 Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:23 PM
27240 Subject: [IRCServices] Is there a LIVE Dierctory????
27241
27242
27243 > a simple question, " Since i'm using UnrealIRCd 3.2 on red hat Lynux,
27244 > is there a Live Directory that I can list my server to??? If so where
27245 >
27246 > Wolf my thanks
27247 >
27248 >
27249 >
27250 >
27251 >
27252 >
27253 >
27254 >
27255 >
27256 >
27257 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
27258 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27259 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27260
27261
27262
27263 From nick.martini at gmail.com Thu Oct 14 10:12:52 2004
27264 From: nick.martini at gmail.com (nick martini)
27265 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27266 Subject: [IRCServices] Is there a LIVE Dierctory????
27267 In-Reply-To: <000b01c4b20d$1ff5fbf0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
27268 References: <416EA7F7.7020309@adelphia.net>
27269 <000b01c4b20d$1ff5fbf0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
27270 Message-ID: <ee1a43f404101410127929a545@mail.gmail.com>
27271
27272 anyone here speak english?
27273
27274
27275 On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:44:50 -0400, Luniz <gluniz@luniz.dyndns.org> wrote:
27276 > A better question would be, why are u asking this in the IRC Services
27277 > mailing list?
27278 >
27279 >
27280 >
27281 > ----- Original Message -----
27282 > From: "Wolf-WGD" <wolf_wgd@adelphia.net>
27283 > To: <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
27284 > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:23 PM
27285 > Subject: [IRCServices] Is there a LIVE Dierctory????
27286 >
27287 > > a simple question, " Since i'm using UnrealIRCd 3.2 on red hat Lynux,
27288 > > is there a Live Directory that I can list my server to??? If so where
27289 > >
27290 > > Wolf my thanks
27291 > >
27292 > >
27293 > >
27294 > >
27295 > >
27296 > >
27297 > >
27298 > >
27299 > >
27300 > >
27301 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
27302 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27303 > > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27304 >
27305 >
27306 >
27307 >
27308 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
27309 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27310 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27311 >
27312
27313
27314 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Fri Oct 15 09:41:46 2004
27315 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
27316 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27317 Subject: [IRCServices] test
27318 Message-ID: <20041015164146.35422.qmail@web53109.mail.yahoo.com>
27319
27320 Just a test email :->
27321
27322 =====
27323 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
27324
27325
27326
27327 __________________________________
27328 Do you Yahoo!?
27329 Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
27330 http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
27331
27332
27333 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Oct 15 11:11:43 2004
27334 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
27335 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27336 Subject: [IRCServices] test
27337 Message-ID: <E1CIXYl-000JVw-4I@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27338
27339 this is a test of reply to your test. no further tests will be replied to to test any more tests or replies to said tests unless testing is needed. :-P
27340
27341 >Just a test email :->
27342 >
27343 >=====
27344 >Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
27345 >
27346 >
27347 >
27348 >__________________________________
27349 >Do you Yahoo!?
27350 >Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
27351 >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
27352 >
27353 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27354 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27355 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27356 >
27357
27358
27359
27360 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun Oct 17 20:01:15 2004
27361 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
27362 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27363 Subject: [IRCServices] BUG: Linking Services Nicknames..
27364 Message-ID: <mailman.1152.1098036075.768.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
27365
27366 It appears that you can /ns link nicknames which are not sqlined, conciquently, if you dont use the standard *Serv format, its easy to link nicknames like ChanProtect, or NetStats, where they are chanserv and statserv respectivly..
27367
27368 Although i am unsure the best way to 'resolve' this is, but it could be potentially dangerous.
27369
27370 /****************************************
27371 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
27372 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
27373 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
27374 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
27375 ****************************************/
27376
27377
27378 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Oct 17 18:59:09 2004
27379 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
27380 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27381 Subject: [IRCServices] BUG: Linking Services Nicknames..
27382 In-Reply-To: <4172b3f4.12174@mail.achurch.org>
27383 Message-ID: <41732357.33055@achurch.org>
27384
27385 >It appears that you can /ns link nicknames which are not sqlined, conciquently, if you dont use the standard *Serv format, its easy to link nicknames like ChanProtect, or NetStats, where they are chanserv and statserv respectivly..
27386
27387 No, you can't. Services checks against the current nickname in use,
27388 not any predefined patterns like *Serv. (This does mean that if you change
27389 the nickname you need to check ahead of time whether it's in use or not,
27390 but that ought to be obvious.)
27391
27392 --Andrew Church
27393 achurch@achurch.org
27394 http://achurch.org/
27395
27396 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Oct 18 11:56:32 2004
27397 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
27398 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27399 Subject: [IRCServices] BUG: Linking Services Nicknames..
27400 Message-ID: <E1CJdgB-000D4k-FJ@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27401
27402 nickserv only checks the value of s_NickServ when you attempt to link a nick. therefore it only forbids its own nickname being linked. As far as services is concerned its own set of nicks 'dont exist' in the user structs. This means that you could link ChanServs nick, if it isnt sqlined right?
27403
27404 >>It appears that you can /ns link nicknames which are not sqlined, conciquently, if you dont use the standard *Serv format, its easy to link nicknames like ChanProtect, or NetStats, where they are chanserv and statserv respectivly..
27405 >
27406 > No, you can't. Services checks against the current nickname in use,
27407 >not any predefined patterns like *Serv. (This does mean that if you change
27408 >the nickname you need to check ahead of time whether it's in use or not,
27409 >but that ought to be obvious.)
27410 >
27411 > --Andrew Church
27412 > achurch@achurch.org
27413 > http://achurch.org/
27414 >
27415 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27416 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27417 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27418 >
27419
27420
27421 From mark at phedny.net Mon Oct 18 13:00:56 2004
27422 From: mark at phedny.net (M. van Cuijk)
27423 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27424 Subject: [IRCServices] BUG: Linking Services Nicknames..
27425 In-Reply-To: <E1CJdgB-000D4k-FJ@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27426 References: <E1CJdgB-000D4k-FJ@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27427 Message-ID: <417420D7.2090202@phedny.net>
27428
27429 Hi,
27430
27431 Just try it before asking ;)
27432
27433 21:56:37 <mark> LINK ChanServ
27434 21:56:37 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname ChanServ may not
27435 be linked.
27436
27437 So to me it seems alright, untill trying some more:
27438
27439 21:57:12 <mark> LINK OperServ
27440 21:57:12 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname OperServ may not
27441 be linked.
27442 21:57:14 <mark> LINK StatServ
27443 21:57:14 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname StatServ has been
27444 linked to your nickname.
27445 21:57:30 <mark> LINK Global
27446 21:57:30 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname Global has been
27447 linked to your nickname.
27448 21:57:35 <mark> LINK NickServ
27449 21:57:35 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname NickServ may not
27450 be linked.
27451 21:57:42 <mark> LINK MemoServ
27452 21:57:42 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname MemoServ may not
27453 be linked.
27454
27455 It seems that StatServ and Global are not protected. In what degree is
27456 this a security issue? I don't seem to be able to use GHOST or RECOVER.
27457 Anyway it would be good to fix this anyway...
27458
27459 - Mark
27460
27461 Craig Edwards wrote:
27462
27463 >nickserv only checks the value of s_NickServ when you attempt to link a nick. therefore it only forbids its own nickname being linked. As far as services is concerned its own set of nicks 'dont exist' in the user structs. This means that you could link ChanServs nick, if it isnt sqlined right?
27464 >
27465 >
27466 >
27467 >>>It appears that you can /ns link nicknames which are not sqlined, conciquently, if you dont use the standard *Serv format, its easy to link nicknames like ChanProtect, or NetStats, where they are chanserv and statserv respectivly..
27468 >>>
27469 >>>
27470 >> No, you can't. Services checks against the current nickname in use,
27471 >>not any predefined patterns like *Serv. (This does mean that if you change
27472 >>the nickname you need to check ahead of time whether it's in use or not,
27473 >>but that ought to be obvious.)
27474 >>
27475 >> --Andrew Church
27476 >> achurch@achurch.org
27477 >> http://achurch.org/
27478 >>
27479 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
27480 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27481 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27482 >>
27483 >>
27484 >>
27485 >
27486 >
27487 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27488 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27489 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27490 >
27491 >
27492 >
27493
27494 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Oct 18 20:19:42 2004
27495 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
27496 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27497 Subject: [IRCServices] BUG: Linking Services Nicknames..
27498 In-Reply-To: <417420D7.2090202@phedny.net>
27499 Message-ID: <41748791.42667@achurch.org>
27500
27501 >21:57:14 <mark> LINK StatServ
27502 >21:57:14 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname StatServ has been
27503 >linked to your nickname.
27504 >21:57:30 <mark> LINK Global
27505 >21:57:30 -NickServ(services@irc.phedny.net)- Nickname Global has been
27506 >linked to your nickname.
27507
27508 Careless error--fixed, thanks for the report.
27509
27510 --Andrew Church
27511 achurch@achurch.org
27512 http://achurch.org/
27513
27514 From profound at eyerc.net Thu Oct 21 17:45:09 2004
27515 From: profound at eyerc.net (Profound)
27516 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27517 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
27518 Message-ID: <417857fc.151.6535.5108@internode.on.net>
27519
27520 Hi,
27521
27522 Just a cosmetic change suggestion to help us sleep better at
27523 night (ircservices-5.0.40)...
27524
27525 When hiding another users email address:
27526
27527 /ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27528
27529 The response comes back:
27530
27531 [10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27532 from NickServ INFO displays.
27533
27534 It would be better to have it say "Si's E-mail address will
27535 now be hidden from NickServ INFO displays."
27536
27537 Cheers,
27538 Tim
27539
27540 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Oct 22 03:02:55 2004
27541 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
27542 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27543 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
27544 Message-ID: <E1CKoo1-000M8Q-Du@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27545
27546 Thank you for your bug report, Profound.
27547
27548 The bug report you posted was:
27549 >Hi,
27550 >
27551 >Just a cosmetic change suggestion to help us sleep better at
27552 >night (ircservices-5.0.40)...
27553 >
27554 >When hiding another users email address:
27555 >
27556 >/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27557 >
27558 >The response comes back:
27559 >
27560 >[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27561 >from NickServ INFO displays.
27562 >
27563 >It would be better to have it say "Si's E-mail address will
27564 >now be hidden from NickServ INFO displays."
27565 >
27566 >Cheers,
27567 >Tim
27568 >
27569 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27570 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27571 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27572 >
27573
27574 Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:14:44.
27575
27576 Regards,
27577 WinBot Central
27578
27579 ---------------------------------------------------
27580
27581 This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27582 report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27583 email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27584 any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27585 information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27586
27587
27588 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Oct 21 18:17:04 2004
27589 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
27590 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27591 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
27592 Message-ID: <E1CKp2w-000MAP-UF@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27593
27594 Thank you for your bug report, Craig Edwards.
27595
27596 The bug report you posted was:
27597 >Thank you for your bug report, Profound.
27598 >
27599 >The bug report you posted was:
27600 >>Hi,
27601 >>
27602 >>Just a cosmetic change suggestion to help us sleep better at
27603 >>night (ircservices-5.0.40)...
27604 >>
27605 >>When hiding another users email address:
27606 >>
27607 >>/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27608 >>
27609 >>The response comes back:
27610 >>
27611 >>[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27612 >>from NickServ INFO displays.
27613 >>
27614 >>It would be better to have it say "Si's E-mail address will
27615 >>now be hidden from NickServ INFO displays."
27616 >>
27617 >>Cheers,
27618 >>Tim
27619 >>
27620 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
27621 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27622 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27623 >>
27624 >
27625 >Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:14:44.
27626 >
27627 >Regards,
27628 >WinBot Central
27629 >
27630 >---------------------------------------------------
27631 >
27632 >This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27633 >report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27634 >email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27635 >any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27636 >information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27637 >
27638 >
27639 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27640 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27641 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27642 >
27643
27644 Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:00:25.
27645
27646 Regards,
27647 WinBot Central
27648
27649 ---------------------------------------------------
27650
27651 This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27652 report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27653 email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27654 any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27655 information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27656
27657
27658 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Oct 21 18:29:32 2004
27659 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
27660 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27661 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
27662 In-Reply-To: <E1CKp2w-000MAP-UF@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27663 Message-ID: <4178626d.53767@achurch.org>
27664
27665 Looks like somebody's been playing around too much with auto-reply
27666 software...
27667
27668 --Andrew Church
27669 achurch@achurch.org
27670 http://achurch.org/
27671
27672 >Thank you for your bug report, Craig Edwards.
27673 >
27674 >The bug report you posted was:
27675 >>Thank you for your bug report, Profound.
27676 >>
27677 >>The bug report you posted was:
27678 >>>Hi,
27679 >>>
27680 >>>Just a cosmetic change suggestion to help us sleep better at
27681 >>>night (ircservices-5.0.40)...
27682 >>>
27683 >>>When hiding another users email address:
27684 >>>
27685 >>>/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27686 >>>
27687 >>>The response comes back:
27688 >>>
27689 >>>[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27690 >>>from NickServ INFO displays.
27691 >>>
27692 >>>It would be better to have it say "Si's E-mail address will
27693 >>>now be hidden from NickServ INFO displays."
27694 >>>
27695 >>>Cheers,
27696 >>>Tim
27697 >>>
27698 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
27699 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27700 >>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27701 >>>
27702 >>
27703 >>Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:14:44.
27704 >>
27705 >>Regards,
27706 >>WinBot Central
27707 >>
27708 >>---------------------------------------------------
27709 >>
27710 >>This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27711 >>report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27712 >>email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27713 >>any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27714 >>information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27715 >>
27716 >>
27717 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
27718 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27719 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27720 >>
27721 >
27722 >Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:00:25.
27723 >
27724 >Regards,
27725 >WinBot Central
27726 >
27727 >---------------------------------------------------
27728 >
27729 >This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27730 >report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27731 >email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27732 >any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27733 >information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27734 >
27735 >
27736 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27737 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27738 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27739
27740 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Oct 21 18:34:14 2004
27741 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
27742 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27743 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
27744 In-Reply-To: <417857fc.151.6535.5108@internode.on.net>
27745 Message-ID: <4178638c.54000@achurch.org>
27746
27747 >When hiding another users email address:
27748 >
27749 >/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27750 >
27751 >The response comes back:
27752 >
27753 >[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27754 >from NickServ INFO displays.
27755
27756 This is a known bug (see the KnownBugs file).
27757
27758 --Andrew Church
27759 achurch@achurch.org
27760 http://achurch.org/
27761
27762 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Oct 21 18:46:29 2004
27763 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
27764 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27765 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
27766 Message-ID: <E1CKpWH-000MEX-PA@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27767
27768 Thank you for your bug report, Andrew Church.
27769
27770 The bug report you posted was:
27771 >>When hiding another users email address:
27772 >>
27773 >>/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27774 >>
27775 >>The response comes back:
27776 >>
27777 >>[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27778 >>from NickServ INFO displays.
27779 >
27780 > This is a known bug (see the KnownBugs file).
27781 >
27782 > --Andrew Church
27783 > achurch@achurch.org
27784 > http://achurch.org/
27785 >
27786 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27787 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27788 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27789 >
27790
27791 Posted on 2004-10-22 at 10:29:24.
27792
27793 Regards,
27794 WinBot Central
27795
27796 ---------------------------------------------------
27797
27798 This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27799 report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27800 email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27801 any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27802 information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27803
27804
27805 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Oct 21 18:47:01 2004
27806 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
27807 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27808 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
27809 Message-ID: <E1CKpWH-000MEX-M5@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27810
27811 Thank you for your bug report, Andrew Church.
27812
27813 The bug report you posted was:
27814 > Looks like somebody's been playing around too much with auto-reply
27815 >software...
27816 >
27817 > --Andrew Church
27818 > achurch@achurch.org
27819 > http://achurch.org/
27820 >
27821 >>Thank you for your bug report, Craig Edwards.
27822 >>
27823 >>The bug report you posted was:
27824 >>>Thank you for your bug report, Profound.
27825 >>>
27826 >>>The bug report you posted was:
27827 >>>>Hi,
27828 >>>>
27829 >>>>Just a cosmetic change suggestion to help us sleep better at
27830 >>>>night (ircservices-5.0.40)...
27831 >>>>
27832 >>>>When hiding another users email address:
27833 >>>>
27834 >>>>/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27835 >>>>
27836 >>>>The response comes back:
27837 >>>>
27838 >>>>[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27839 >>>>from NickServ INFO displays.
27840 >>>>
27841 >>>>It would be better to have it say "Si's E-mail address will
27842 >>>>now be hidden from NickServ INFO displays."
27843 >>>>
27844 >>>>Cheers,
27845 >>>>Tim
27846 >>>>
27847 >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------
27848 >>>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27849 >>>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27850 >>>>
27851 >>>
27852 >>>Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:14:44.
27853 >>>
27854 >>>Regards,
27855 >>>WinBot Central
27856 >>>
27857 >>>---------------------------------------------------
27858 >>>
27859 >>>This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27860 >>>report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27861 >>>email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27862 >>>any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27863 >>>information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27864 >>>
27865 >>>
27866 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
27867 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27868 >>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27869 >>>
27870 >>
27871 >>Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:00:25.
27872 >>
27873 >>Regards,
27874 >>WinBot Central
27875 >>
27876 >>---------------------------------------------------
27877 >>
27878 >>This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27879 >>report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27880 >>email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27881 >>any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27882 >>information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27883 >>
27884 >>
27885 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
27886 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27887 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27888 >
27889 >------------------------------------------------------------------
27890 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27891 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27892 >
27893
27894 Posted on 2004-10-22 at 10:28:47.
27895
27896 Regards,
27897 WinBot Central
27898
27899 ---------------------------------------------------
27900
27901 This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
27902 report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
27903 email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
27904 any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
27905 information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
27906
27907
27908 From ircserv at elric.net Thu Oct 21 18:49:34 2004
27909 From: ircserv at elric.net (Brent DiNicola)
27910 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27911 Subject: [IRCServices] Request for updated Help File entry.
27912 In-Reply-To: <4178638c.54000@achurch.org>
27913 References: <4178638c.54000@achurch.org>
27914 Message-ID: <1098409698.4164.12.camel@stormbringer>
27915
27916 Currently Nickserv says the following about using /ns link NICK:
27917
27918 In order to use this command, you must identify for your
27919 current nickname (using the IDENTIFY command), and the
27920 nickname to be linked must not currently be in use.
27921
27922 Can you update the last line to read:
27923
27924 nickname to be linked must not currently be in use and
27925 not currently registered.
27926
27927 I have had several used to older services versions register and then try
27928 to link and not understand why that wouldn't work.
27929
27930 Thanks
27931
27932 Brent
27933 --
27934 Brent DiNicola
27935 The Whitewolf of Immyrr
27936 <ircserv .AT. elric.net>
27937 http://www.melnibone.net
27938 Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed here are from my dog.
27939 Any liabilities fall to the dog.
27940 -----------------------
27941
27942
27943 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Oct 21 19:02:41 2004
27944 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
27945 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
27946 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide
27947 email on
27948 Message-ID: <E1CKpl2-000MH5-4Z@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
27949
27950 Thank you for your bug report, Craig Edwards.
27951
27952 The bug report you posted was:
27953 >Thank you for your bug report, Andrew Church.
27954 >
27955 >The bug report you posted was:
27956 >> Looks like somebody's been playing around too much with auto-reply
27957 >>software...
27958 >>
27959 >> --Andrew Church
27960 >> achurch@achurch.org
27961 >> http://achurch.org/
27962 >>
27963 >>>Thank you for your bug report, Craig Edwards.
27964 >>>
27965 >>>The bug report you posted was:
27966 >>>>Thank you for your bug report, Profound.
27967 >>>>
27968 >>>>The bug report you posted was:
27969 >>>>>Hi,
27970 >>>>>
27971 >>>>>Just a cosmetic change suggestion to help us sleep better at
27972 >>>>>night (ircservices-5.0.40)...
27973 >>>>>
27974 >>>>>When hiding another users email address:
27975 >>>>>
27976 >>>>>/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
27977 >>>>>
27978 >>>>>The response comes back:
27979 >>>>>
27980 >>>>>[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
27981 >>>>>from NickServ INFO displays.
27982 >>>>>
27983 >>>>>It would be better to have it say "Si's E-mail address will
27984 >>>>>now be hidden from NickServ INFO displays."
27985 >>>>>
27986 >>>>>Cheers,
27987 >>>>>Tim
27988 >>>>>
27989 >>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------
27990 >>>>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
27991 >>>>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
27992 >>>>>
27993 >>>>
27994 >>>>Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:14:44.
27995 >>>>
27996 >>>>Regards,
27997 >>>>WinBot Central
27998 >>>>
27999 >>>>---------------------------------------------------
28000 >>>>
28001 >>>>This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28002 >>>>report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28003 >>>>email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28004 >>>>any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28005 >>>>information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28006 >>>>
28007 >>>>
28008 >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------
28009 >>>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28010 >>>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28011 >>>>
28012 >>>
28013 >>>Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:00:25.
28014 >>>
28015 >>>Regards,
28016 >>>WinBot Central
28017 >>>
28018 >>>---------------------------------------------------
28019 >>>
28020 >>>This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28021 >>>report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28022 >>>email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28023 >>>any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28024 >>>information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28025 >>>
28026 >>>
28027 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
28028 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28029 >>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28030 >>
28031 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
28032 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28033 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28034 >>
28035 >
28036 >Posted on 2004-10-22 at 10:28:47.
28037 >
28038 >Regards,
28039 >WinBot Central
28040 >
28041 >---------------------------------------------------
28042 >
28043 >This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28044 >report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28045 >email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28046 >any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28047 >information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28048 >
28049 >
28050 >------------------------------------------------------------------
28051 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28052 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28053 >
28054
28055 Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:46:09.
28056
28057 Regards,
28058 WinBot Central
28059
28060 ---------------------------------------------------
28061
28062 This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28063 report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28064 email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28065 any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28066 information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28067
28068
28069 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Oct 21 19:03:09 2004
28070 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
28071 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28072 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
28073 Message-ID: <E1CKpl2-000MH5-3B@brainbox.winbot.co.uk>
28074
28075 Thank you for your bug report, Craig Edwards.
28076
28077 The bug report you posted was:
28078 >Thank you for your bug report, Andrew Church.
28079 >
28080 >The bug report you posted was:
28081 >>>When hiding another users email address:
28082 >>>
28083 >>>/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
28084 >>>
28085 >>>The response comes back:
28086 >>>
28087 >>>[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
28088 >>>from NickServ INFO displays.
28089 >>
28090 >> This is a known bug (see the KnownBugs file).
28091 >>
28092 >> --Andrew Church
28093 >> achurch@achurch.org
28094 >> http://achurch.org/
28095 >>
28096 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
28097 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28098 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28099 >>
28100 >
28101 >Posted on 2004-10-22 at 10:29:24.
28102 >
28103 >Regards,
28104 >WinBot Central
28105 >
28106 >---------------------------------------------------
28107 >
28108 >This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28109 >report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28110 >email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28111 >any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28112 >information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28113 >
28114 >
28115 >------------------------------------------------------------------
28116 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28117 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28118 >
28119
28120 Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:46:09.
28121
28122 Regards,
28123 WinBot Central
28124
28125 ---------------------------------------------------
28126
28127 This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28128 report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28129 email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28130 any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28131 information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28132
28133
28134 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu Oct 21 19:25:08 2004
28135 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
28136 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28137 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
28138 Message-ID: <mailman.1216.1098411908.768.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
28139
28140 ok, i just got him to switch it off, it was because of the words 'Bug Report' in the subject line apparently, i appologise on his behalf for any inconvieniance caused.
28141
28142 RE: Request for updated help file entry..
28143
28144 I agree with this, although i wouldn't call it a priority!
28145
28146
28147 /****************************************
28148 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
28149 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
28150 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
28151 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
28152 ****************************************/
28153
28154
28155 /****************************************
28156 * From - Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
28157 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
28158 * Sent - 10:28:47 @ 2004-10-22
28159 * Subject - Re: Re: [IRCServices] Bug report with /ns set <nick> hide email on
28160 ****************************************/
28161
28162 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
28163
28164 > Looks like somebody's been playing around too much with auto-reply
28165 >software...
28166 >
28167 > --Andrew Church
28168 > achurch@achurch.org
28169 > http://achurch.org/
28170 >
28171 >>Thank you for your bug report, Craig Edwards.
28172 >>
28173 >>The bug report you posted was:
28174 >>>Thank you for your bug report, Profound.
28175 >>>
28176 >>>The bug report you posted was:
28177 >>>>Hi,
28178 >>>>
28179 >>>>Just a cosmetic change suggestion to help us sleep better at
28180 >>>>night (ircservices-5.0.40)...
28181 >>>>
28182 >>>>When hiding another users email address:
28183 >>>>
28184 >>>>/ns SET Si HIDE EMAIL ON
28185 >>>>
28186 >>>>The response comes back:
28187 >>>>
28188 >>>>[10:07] -NickServ- Your E-mail address will now be hidden
28189 >>>>from NickServ INFO displays.
28190 >>>>
28191 >>>>It would be better to have it say "Si's E-mail address will
28192 >>>>now be hidden from NickServ INFO displays."
28193 >>>>
28194 >>>>Cheers,
28195 >>>>Tim
28196 >>>>
28197 >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------
28198 >>>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28199 >>>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28200 >>>>
28201 >>>
28202 >>>Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:14:44.
28203 >>>
28204 >>>Regards,
28205 >>>WinBot Central
28206 >>>
28207 >>>---------------------------------------------------
28208 >>>
28209 >>>This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28210 >>>report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28211 >>>email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28212 >>>any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28213 >>>information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28214 >>>
28215 >>>
28216 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
28217 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28218 >>>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28219 >>>
28220 >>
28221 >>Posted on 2004-10-22 at 02:00:25.
28222 >>
28223 >>Regards,
28224 >>WinBot Central
28225 >>
28226 >>---------------------------------------------------
28227 >>
28228 >>This is an automated reply sent because you submitted a bug
28229 >>report due to a crash in your bot. We do not send unsolicited bulk
28230 >>email or allow access to your email address to third parties under
28231 >>any circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this
28232 >>information please email brain@winbot.co.uk
28233 >>
28234 >>
28235 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
28236 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28237 >>http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28238 >
28239 >------------------------------------------------------------------
28240 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28241 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28242
28243 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
28244
28245
28246 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Fri Oct 22 00:43:11 2004
28247 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
28248 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28249 Subject: [IRCServices] Clarification with unreal.c
28250 In-Reply-To: <200410220205.i9M25Fng022795@mx1.wm.co.za>
28251 Message-ID: <web-484318024@mail01.infosat.net>
28252
28253 OK, I'll start this off by saying that I know nothing about
28254 C programming...
28255
28256 Anyway, I was feeling bored, so I was reading over unreal.c
28257 and I noticed this in the "new channel user modes" section:
28258
28259 {'h', {0x00000004,1,1,'%'}}, /* Half-op */
28260
28261 Now, I'm probably horribly wrong, but the "%" probably
28262 denotes the user prefix (since halfop's nicks are prefixed
28263 with a %).
28264
28265 If I'm right, then take a look at the next two lines:
28266
28267 {'a', {0x00000008,1,1,'~'}},
28268 {'q', {0x00000010,1,1,'*',MI_CHANOWNER}},
28269
28270 Assuming that my above premise is correct, this code
28271 wouldn't be correct, as +a gets the & prefix and +q the ~
28272 prefix in UnrealIRCd. I haven't yet tried changing this
28273 code to see what happens; I'll give that a go this evening.
28274
28275 Of course, I could be horribly, horribly wrong... if I am,
28276 would someone mind correcting me on this?
28277
28278 (By the way. I will not be impressed if I receive an
28279 auto-reply.)
28280 _____________________________________________________________________
28281 For super low premiums ,click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
28282
28283 From dnb at majestic-liaisons.com Fri Oct 22 01:10:12 2004
28284 From: dnb at majestic-liaisons.com (DeadNotBuried)
28285 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28286 Subject: [IRCServices] Clarification with unreal.c
28287 References: <web-484318024@mail01.infosat.net>
28288 Message-ID: <000701c4b80e$75d717a0$1000a8c0@dnblaptop>
28289
28290
28291 if you change the line as stated you will break support in services for the
28292 channel owner flag. as services connects to a server it talks to the ircd as
28293 a server not as a client, and the unreal 3.2 protocol uses * as a chan owner
28294 flag between SERVERS, and & IF compiled to support the new flags for
28295 CLIENTS, or just the old @ IF NOT compiled for the new flags for CLIENTS..
28296 it's not recommened to change any of those types of flags in services
28297 packages, or even IRCd's themselves unless you know how the protocol works.
28298
28299 DNB
28300
28301 > OK, I'll start this off by saying that I know nothing about
28302 > C programming...
28303 >
28304 > Anyway, I was feeling bored, so I was reading over unreal.c
28305 > and I noticed this in the "new channel user modes" section:
28306 >
28307 > {'h', {0x00000004,1,1,'%'}}, /* Half-op */
28308 >
28309 > Now, I'm probably horribly wrong, but the "%" probably
28310 > denotes the user prefix (since halfop's nicks are prefixed
28311 > with a %).
28312 >
28313 > If I'm right, then take a look at the next two lines:
28314 >
28315 > {'a', {0x00000008,1,1,'~'}},
28316 > {'q', {0x00000010,1,1,'*',MI_CHANOWNER}},
28317 >
28318 > Assuming that my above premise is correct, this code
28319 > wouldn't be correct, as +a gets the & prefix and +q the ~
28320 > prefix in UnrealIRCd. I haven't yet tried changing this
28321 > code to see what happens; I'll give that a go this evening.
28322 >
28323 > Of course, I could be horribly, horribly wrong... if I am,
28324 > would someone mind correcting me on this?
28325 >
28326
28327
28328
28329 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Oct 22 01:19:40 2004
28330 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28331 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28332 Subject: [IRCServices] Clarification with unreal.c
28333 In-Reply-To: <web-484318024@mail01.infosat.net>
28334 Message-ID: <4178c28e.54112@achurch.org>
28335
28336 >If I'm right, then take a look at the next two lines:
28337 >
28338 > {'a', {0x00000008,1,1,'~'}},
28339 > {'q', {0x00000010,1,1,'*',MI_CHANOWNER}},
28340 >
28341 >Assuming that my above premise is correct, this code
28342 >wouldn't be correct, as +a gets the & prefix and +q the ~
28343 >prefix in UnrealIRCd. I haven't yet tried changing this
28344 >code to see what happens; I'll give that a go this evening.
28345 >
28346 >Of course, I could be horribly, horribly wrong...
28347
28348 You are. (: The prefix character is for the prefixes used in the
28349 SJOIN message, not the prefixes shown to users.
28350
28351 --Andrew Church
28352 achurch@achurch.org
28353 http://achurch.org/
28354
28355 From ianj at esper.net Fri Oct 22 13:42:39 2004
28356 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
28357 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28358 Subject: [IRCServices] (Slightly off-topic,
28359 but pertinent) GNU Mailman help needed
28360 Message-ID: <4179708C.8010400@esper.net>
28361
28362
28363 Hi, all.
28364
28365 Could someone with GNU Mailman experience please contact me off-list? I
28366 have a few questions I need answered.
28367
28368 Any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated!
28369
28370 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
28371
28372 -----
28373 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official
28374 EsperNet business)
28375 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
28376 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
28377
28378 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
28379
28380
28381 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Oct 22 16:54:13 2004
28382 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28383 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28384 Subject: [IRCServices] Request for updated Help File entry.
28385 In-Reply-To: <1098409698.4164.12.camel@stormbringer>
28386 Message-ID: <41799d96.76425@achurch.org>
28387
28388 I've updated this for 5.1.
28389
28390 --Andrew Church
28391 achurch@achurch.org
28392 http://achurch.org/
28393
28394 >Currently Nickserv says the following about using /ns link NICK:
28395 >
28396 >In order to use this command, you must identify for your
28397 >current nickname (using the IDENTIFY command), and the
28398 >nickname to be linked must not currently be in use.
28399 >
28400 >Can you update the last line to read:
28401 >
28402 >nickname to be linked must not currently be in use and
28403 >not currently registered.
28404 >
28405 >I have had several used to older services versions register and then try
28406 >to link and not understand why that wouldn't work.
28407 >
28408 >Thanks
28409 >
28410 >Brent
28411 >--
28412 >Brent DiNicola
28413 >The Whitewolf of Immyrr
28414 ><ircserv .AT. elric.net>
28415 >http://www.melnibone.net
28416 >Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed here are from my dog.
28417 >Any liabilities fall to the dog.
28418 >-----------------------
28419 >
28420 >
28421 >------------------------------------------------------------------
28422 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28423 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28424
28425 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Sat Oct 23 06:01:02 2004
28426 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
28427 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28428 Subject: [IRCServices] smart expiration system
28429 Message-ID: <000901c4b900$388a9000$403d05d5@server>
28430
28431 I was thinking about a system of variable time of expiry of Nicknames /
28432 Channels depending on the time that is registered.
28433 Something like this:
28434
28435
28436
28437 (1) A nickname/chan that is registered for <12 months: 1*30+5 not
28438 used days before expire
28439 (2) A nickname/chan that is registered for >12 months: 2*30+5 not
28440 used days before expire
28441 (3) A nickname/chan that is registered for >24 months: 3*30+5 not
28442 used days before expire
28443 (4) A nickname/chan that is registered for >36 months: 6*30+5 not
28444 used days before expire
28445 (5) A nickname/chan that is registered for >48 months: 8*30+5 not
28446 used days before expire
28447 (6) A nickname/chan that is registered for >60 months: 10*30+5 not used
28448 days before expire
28449 (7) A nickname/chan that is registered for >72 months: 12*30+5 not used
28450 days before expire
28451
28452 Of course all numbers (months,days) can be modified from the config file..
28453 And when a nickname will pass from a category to another a memo will be sent
28454 to inform the owner of this nick.
28455 Services administrators should be able to see and modify the category for
28456 each user.
28457
28458 With this method we will avoid problems with Nicknames / Channels that
28459 expires because their owners who are "old" on a network for some reason
28460 could not be identified for long time (for channels noone accessed join for
28461 a long time) .
28462
28463 This is also something like a "present" for the old users.
28464
28465
28466 I'm waiting for your opinions :))
28467 Cya
28468
28469
28470
28471 From medice at gmx.at Sat Oct 23 10:39:00 2004
28472 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
28473 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28474 Subject: [IRCServices] smart expiration system
28475 In-Reply-To: <000901c4b900$388a9000$403d05d5@server>
28476 References: <000901c4b900$388a9000$403d05d5@server>
28477 Message-ID: <417A9708.1050208@gmx.at>
28478
28479 Sounds like a good idea, but:
28480 i think it's not necessary to have that much categories - 2-4 should be
28481 enough...
28482 I think some sort of setable "category" is not really useful, since
28483 services may calculate the situation by themselfes...
28484
28485 greets
28486 /medice
28487
28488
28489 Dionisios K. wrote:
28490 > I was thinking about a system of variable time of expiry of Nicknames /
28491 > Channels depending on the time that is registered.
28492 > Something like this:
28493 >
28494 >
28495 >
28496 > (1) A nickname/chan that is registered for <12 months: 1*30+5 not
28497 > used days before expire
28498 > (2) A nickname/chan that is registered for >12 months: 2*30+5 not
28499 > used days before expire
28500 > (3) A nickname/chan that is registered for >24 months: 3*30+5 not
28501 > used days before expire
28502 > (4) A nickname/chan that is registered for >36 months: 6*30+5 not
28503 > used days before expire
28504 > (5) A nickname/chan that is registered for >48 months: 8*30+5 not
28505 > used days before expire
28506 > (6) A nickname/chan that is registered for >60 months: 10*30+5 not
28507 > used days before expire
28508 > (7) A nickname/chan that is registered for >72 months: 12*30+5 not
28509 > used days before expire
28510 >
28511 > Of course all numbers (months,days) can be modified from the config file..
28512 > And when a nickname will pass from a category to another a memo will be
28513 > sent to inform the owner of this nick.
28514 > Services administrators should be able to see and modify the category
28515 > for each user.
28516 >
28517 > With this method we will avoid problems with Nicknames / Channels that
28518 > expires because their owners who are "old" on a network for some reason
28519 > could not be identified for long time (for channels noone accessed join
28520 > for a long time) .
28521 >
28522 > This is also something like a "present" for the old users.
28523 >
28524 >
28525 > I'm waiting for your opinions :))
28526 > Cya
28527
28528
28529 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Oct 23 10:41:43 2004
28530 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
28531 Date: Sat Oct 23 23:02:13 2004
28532 Subject: [IRCServices] smart expiration system
28533 Message-ID: <mailman.1256.1098553303.768.ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
28534
28535 although slightly complex, i like this idea.. We occasionally have users who have been on our network for years go on holiday for 2months, and find their nickname in someone elses possesion.
28536
28537 So i like it :D
28538
28539 /****************************************
28540 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
28541 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
28542 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
28543 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
28544 ****************************************/
28545
28546
28547 /****************************************
28548 * From - Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
28549 * To - ircservices@ircservices.za.net <ircservices@ircservices.za.net>
28550 * Sent - 13:59:41 @ 2004-10-23
28551 * Subject - [IRCServices] smart expiration system
28552 ****************************************/
28553
28554 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
28555
28556 >I was thinking about a system of variable time of expiry of Nicknames /
28557 >Channels depending on the time that is registered.
28558 >Something like this:
28559 >
28560 >
28561 >
28562 >(1) A nickname/chan that is registered for <12 months: 1*30+5 not
28563 >used days before expire
28564 >(2) A nickname/chan that is registered for >12 months: 2*30+5 not
28565 >used days before expire
28566 >(3) A nickname/chan that is registered for >24 months: 3*30+5 not
28567 >used days before expire
28568 >(4) A nickname/chan that is registered for >36 months: 6*30+5 not
28569 >used days before expire
28570 >(5) A nickname/chan that is registered for >48 months: 8*30+5 not
28571 >used days before expire
28572 >(6) A nickname/chan that is registered for >60 months: 10*30+5 not used
28573 >days before expire
28574 >(7) A nickname/chan that is registered for >72 months: 12*30+5 not used
28575 >days before expire
28576 >
28577 >Of course all numbers (months,days) can be modified from the config file..
28578 >And when a nickname will pass from a category to another a memo will be sent
28579 >to inform the owner of this nick.
28580 >Services administrators should be able to see and modify the category for
28581 >each user.
28582 >
28583 >With this method we will avoid problems with Nicknames / Channels that
28584 >expires because their owners who are "old" on a network for some reason
28585 >could not be identified for long time (for channels noone accessed join for
28586 >a long time) .
28587 >
28588 >This is also something like a "present" for the old users.
28589 >
28590 >
28591 >I'm waiting for your opinions :))
28592 >Cya
28593 >
28594 >
28595 >
28596 >------------------------------------------------------------------
28597 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28598 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28599
28600 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
28601
28602
28603 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Oct 24 00:30:17 2004
28604 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28605 Date: Sun Oct 24 00:30:18 2004
28606 Subject: [IRCServices] Test mail
28607 Message-ID: <20041024073017.18AEEFB7D3B@sakura.ian-justman.com>
28608
28609 Test message, please ignore.
28610
28611 From ianj at esper.net Sun Oct 24 01:00:39 2004
28612 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
28613 Date: Sun Oct 24 01:00:37 2004
28614 Subject: [IRCServices] Test mail
28615 In-Reply-To: <20041024073017.18AEEFB7D3B@sakura.ian-justman.com>
28616 References: <20041024073017.18AEEFB7D3B@sakura.ian-justman.com>
28617 Message-ID: <417B6127.2040101@esper.net>
28618
28619 Andrew Church wrote:
28620
28621 > Test message, please ignore.
28622
28623 Oh, and did I tell you that I absolutely HATE Mailman? ;) (Andy will
28624 know what I'm talking about.)
28625
28626 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
28627
28628 -----
28629 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
28630 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
28631 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
28632
28633 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
28634 From ianj at esper.net Sun Oct 24 07:07:37 2004
28635 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
28636 Date: Sun Oct 24 07:07:37 2004
28637 Subject: [IRCServices] Test mail
28638 In-Reply-To: <417B6127.2040101@esper.net>
28639 References: <20041024073017.18AEEFB7D3B@sakura.ian-justman.com>
28640 <417B6127.2040101@esper.net>
28641 Message-ID: <417BB729.9080105@esper.net>
28642
28643 Ian R. Justman wrote:
28644 > Andrew Church wrote:
28645 >
28646 >> Test message, please ignore.
28647 >
28648 >
28649 > Oh, and did I tell you that I absolutely HATE Mailman? ;) (Andy will
28650 > know what I'm talking about.)
28651
28652 And on that note, I don't need that help I requested anymore. I've
28653 completed the project in question.
28654
28655 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
28656
28657 -----
28658 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
28659 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
28660 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
28661
28662 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
28663 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Oct 28 11:48:33 2004
28664 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28665 Date: Wed Oct 27 19:50:27 2004
28666 Subject: [IRCServices] Server move and potential downtime
28667 Message-ID: <41805e5e.56424@achurch.org>
28668
28669 The server move mentioned previously is mostly complete; however,
28670 delays in getting DNS records updated may result in a few days of website
28671 and mailing list downtime. Please be patient.
28672
28673 --Andrew Church
28674 achurch@achurch.org
28675 http://achurch.org/
28676 From ianj at esper.net Thu Oct 28 19:17:49 2004
28677 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
28678 Date: Thu Oct 28 19:18:04 2004
28679 Subject: [IRCServices] Server move and potential downtime
28680 In-Reply-To: <41805e5e.56424@achurch.org>
28681 References: <41805e5e.56424@achurch.org>
28682 Message-ID: <4181A84D.8090102@esper.net>
28683
28684 Andrew Church wrote:
28685 > The server move mentioned previously is mostly complete; however,
28686 > delays in getting DNS records updated may result in a few days of website
28687 > and mailing list downtime. Please be patient.
28688
28689 On that note, how soon are we looking at things being lit up again, do
28690 you figure?
28691
28692 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
28693
28694 -----
28695 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
28696 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
28697 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
28698
28699 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
28700 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Nov 12 10:31:07 2004
28701 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28702 Date: Thu Nov 11 17:41:55 2004
28703 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: Fw: Loging Problem With Unreal
28704 In-Reply-To: <003901c4c83f$7e82c250$0800000a@citir>
28705 Message-ID: <419414d4.06125@achurch.org>
28706
28707 [Note to Ali Sor: your provider is rejecting mail from me. Please contact
28708 your technical support and refer them to http://achurch.org/sorbs.html .]
28709
28710 [Note to everyone else: the mailing lists and website are down because of
28711 DNS registrar troubles, as mentioned below.]
28712
28713 >Mail is turning back to me because of that i am sending this to you.=20
28714
28715 The domain registrar for ircservices.za.net hasn't updated the DNS
28716 servers yet (after 3 weeks!), so that's why the mailing lists are down.
28717 If it doesn't get fixed soon I may end up getting a separate domain.
28718
28719 >I checked my log files today and saw that there is a big raise at the =
28720 >file sizes. (150 MB each day ?!?!?!) =20
28721 >
28722 >After checking i saw that lots of lines like=20
28723 >[Nov 09 01:43:15 2004] unknown message from server (:irc.blabla.net Ss S =
28724 >:[Spamfilter] .......................
28725 >
28726 >Seems like Spamfilter of Unreal makes the logs to get really big =
28727 >because of that unknown message log.=20
28728 >
28729 >Is there an option not to log unknown messages?
28730
28731 Technically, "unknown message" entries are bugs, because the protocol
28732 module should catch all of them. I'll take a look at the Unreal module
28733 and see if I can fix the problem.
28734
28735 --Andrew Church
28736 achurch@achurch.org
28737 http://achurch.org/
28738
28739
28740 --Andrew Church
28741 achurch@achurch.org
28742 http://achurch.org/
28743 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 22 15:40:30 2004
28744 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28745 Date: Sun Nov 21 22:41:11 2004
28746 Subject: [IRCServices] Test message, please ignore
28747 Message-ID: <41a189f1.07265@achurch.org>
28748
28749 This is a test. This is only a test.
28750
28751 --Andrew Church
28752 achurch@achurch.org
28753 http://achurch.org/
28754 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 22 15:48:13 2004
28755 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28756 Date: Sun Nov 21 22:53:53 2004
28757 Subject: [IRCServices] Test message, please ignore
28758 In-Reply-To: <41a189f1.07265@achurch.org>
28759 Message-ID: <41a18cf8.07324@achurch.org>
28760
28761 > This is a test. This is only a test.
28762
28763 I passed! :D
28764
28765 Since the za.net domain administrators seem to be asleep at the
28766 switch, I've secured a temporary home for Services at
28767 http://www.ircservices.esper.net/, until either za.net gets their act
28768 together or I find a new domain to use. The mailing list addresses have
28769 likewise been changed to ircservices{,-coding}@ircservices.esper.net, so
28770 please change any aliases you may have. Apologies for the inconvenience.
28771
28772 I'll be releasing Services 5.0.42 shortly with accumulated changes.
28773
28774 --Andrew Church
28775 achurch@achurch.org
28776 http://achurch.org/
28777 From ianj at esper.net Sun Nov 21 23:04:24 2004
28778 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
28779 Date: Sun Nov 21 23:04:30 2004
28780 Subject: [IRCServices] New test
28781 Message-ID: <41A18F78.5090903@esper.net>
28782
28783
28784 Confirming completed cutover to "esper.net".
28785
28786 And just a reminder, since it now DOUBLY applies as we now host the
28787 lists and, to a degree (if only by name), the website, EsperNet staff
28788 CANNOT help with Services-related questions. Though nowadays, things
28789 seem to have calmed down a bit, but I figured I'd let everyone know this.
28790
28791 We just host the lists and FTP and happened to be the pilot network to
28792 use ANY open-sourced IRC services code.
28793
28794 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
28795
28796 -----
28797 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
28798 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
28799 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
28800
28801 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
28802 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 22 16:34:56 2004
28803 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28804 Date: Sun Nov 21 23:44:41 2004
28805 Subject: [IRCServices] Lots of AKILLS kill services
28806 In-Reply-To: <20041024075104.GA71328@edgemaster.zombie.org>
28807 Message-ID: <41a198e1.10347@achurch.org>
28808
28809 I can't reproduce this, either through manually adding autokills or
28810 with the AKILLCHAN command. I'd suggest trying to get a backtrace, but I
28811 suspect the real problem is earlier, since there shouldn't be any way for
28812 an autokill without an "@" to get added in the first place. The log looks
28813 like what would happen if all of the autokill masks were stored at the same
28814 address, but since the masks are always individually allocated, that
28815 shouldn't be possible. If you can still reproduce this, try the following:
28816
28817 - Back up your current database files.
28818
28819 - Shut down Services (/os shutdown, so the data files are saved)
28820 before the autokills expire.
28821
28822 - Restart Services, and see if the problem still occurs.
28823
28824 - If it does, send me a copy of your autokill database file (akill.db)
28825 and I'll look into it. If not, there's probably a strange issue
28826 related to memory allocation which will probably be impossible to
28827 debug without running Services in a debugger and watching how
28828 AKILLCHAN and the expiration routines perform.
28829
28830 --Andrew Church
28831 achurch@achurch.org
28832 http://achurch.org/
28833
28834 >
28835 >--===============0398048210==
28836 >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
28837 > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V"
28838 >Content-Disposition: inline
28839 >
28840 >
28841 >--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
28842 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
28843 >Content-Disposition: inline
28844 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
28845 >
28846 >We are using IRCServices 5.0.41 and have noticed that Services sometimes
28847 >misbehave and crash when expiring AKILLs. This is most noticable when
28848 >hundreds of AKILLs expire, such as from a botnet AKILLfest.
28849 >
28850 >OperServ always GLOBOPS with "AKILL on * has expired" many times before
28851 >dying, then dies with "PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)"
28852 >
28853 >Below are bits from a log when I duplicated this behavior and my comments:
28854 >
28855 >[Oct 24 03:06:13.467357 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :drdink used A=
28856 >KILLCHAN for =02#CLTest=02
28857 >
28858 >This channel had a bunch of clones in it with 800 different hostnames. As
28859 >such, this command placed 800 AKILLs of the form cl-<n>.slashnet.org where
28860 >1 <=3D n <=3D 800.
28861 >
28862 >[Oct 24 03:06:13.467435 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL + G *=
28863 > cl-1.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org 1098601873 1098601573 :Services te=
28864 >st.
28865 >[Oct 24 03:06:13.467484 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL + G *=
28866 > cl-2.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org 1098601873 1098601573 :Services te=
28867 >st.
28868 >=2E..
28869 >[Oct 24 03:06:13.628544 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL + G *=
28870 > cl-800.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org 1098601873 1098601573 :Services =
28871 >test.
28872 >[Oct 24 03:06:13.628590 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ NOTICE drdink :800 use=
28873 >rs autokilled.
28874 >
28875 >Then, when it came time for them to expire:
28876 >
28877 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.453578 2004] debug: Saving databases
28878 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.461241 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on *@cl=
28879 >-1.slashnet.org has expired
28880 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471230 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL - G *=
28881 > cl-1.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org
28882 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471493 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28883 >s expired
28884 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471532 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28885 > in mask: *
28886 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471614 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28887 >s expired
28888 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471649 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28889 > in mask: *
28890 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471727 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28891 >s expired
28892 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471761 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28893 > in mask: *
28894 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471839 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28895 >s expired
28896 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471872 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28897 > in mask: *
28898 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471950 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28899 >s expired
28900 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.471984 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28901 > in mask: *
28902 >=2E..
28903 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.477901 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on *@cl=
28904 >-56.slashnet.org has expired
28905 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.477941 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL - G *=
28906 > cl-56.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org
28907 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.478010 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on *@cl=
28908 >-57.slashnet.org has expired
28909 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.478049 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL - G *=
28910 > cl-57.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org
28911 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.478114 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on *@cl=
28912 >-58.slashnet.org has expired
28913 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.478153 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL - G *=
28914 > cl-58.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org
28915 >=2E..
28916 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.483745 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on *@cl=
28917 >-109.slashnet.org has expired
28918 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.483784 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org TKL - G *=
28919 > cl-109.slashnet.org services.slashnet.org
28920 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.483846 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28921 >s expired
28922 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.483880 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28923 > in mask: *
28924 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.483969 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28925 >s expired
28926 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.484003 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28927 > in mask: *
28928 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.484075 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28929 >s expired
28930 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.484109 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28931 > in mask: *
28932 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.484180 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28933 >s expired
28934 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.484214 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28935 > in mask: *
28936 >=2E..
28937 >Oct 24 03:12:02.489257 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ =
28938 >in mask: *
28939 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.489327 2004] debug: Sent: :OperServ GLOBOPS :AKILL on * ha=
28940 >s expired
28941 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.489361 2004] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @=
28942 > in mask: *
28943 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.792333 2004] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
28944 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.792989 2004] debug: Sent: :services.slashnet.org GLOBOPS :=
28945 >PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
28946 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.793100 2004] Services terminating: Abort trap
28947 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.793137 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-export'
28948 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.847234 2004] debug: Unloading module `misc/xml-import'
28949 >[Oct 24 03:12:02.877397 2004] FATAL: Caught signal 30 (User defined signal =
28950 >1) while shutting down
28951 >
28952 >--=20
28953 >Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
28954 >smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org
28955 >
28956 >--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
28957 >Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
28958 >Content-Disposition: inline
28959 >
28960 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28961 >Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
28962 >
28963 >iD8DBQFBe17kPm7A9NLl4pYRAgVOAJ9oBxUinXUfU5PbqdynGUrsIdZwhwCgkraC
28964 >cwND6JSM9/lirm75o7fDPfY=
28965 >=yUBE
28966 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28967 >
28968 >--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
28969 >
28970 >
28971 >--===============0398048210==
28972 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
28973 >MIME-Version: 1.0
28974 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
28975 >Content-Disposition: inline
28976 >
28977 >------------------------------------------------------------------
28978 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
28979 >http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
28980 >
28981 >--===============0398048210==--
28982 >
28983 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 22 16:52:07 2004
28984 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
28985 Date: Sun Nov 21 23:58:13 2004
28986 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices attacks
28987 In-Reply-To: <8c98c49f69737e106487338e5becdc9f@teknet.com.tr>
28988 Message-ID: <41a19c0e.11265@achurch.org>
28989
28990 There's unfortunately no way to completely stop attacks like these,
28991 unless you can isolate the IP addresses that are causing problems and ban
28992 them from your network. As others suggested, you could try limiting user
28993 sendq, but if there are too many users all doing it at once that may not
28994 help. Services' ignore system isn't the best, and I'm hoping to improve it
28995 for version 5.1, but no matter how good it gets, it takes a certain amount
28996 of resources just to determine whether the message should be ignored or
28997 not, and if there are too many messages coming in there's nothing Services
28998 can do.
28999
29000 Think of this as a new variety of DDoS attack: instead of flooding
29001 your servers with pings, the attacker is flooding your Services with
29002 messages. In both cases, the only thing you can do is track down the IP
29003 address of every bot and ban them all (or try to contact the attacker
29004 directly, or get the authorities to help).
29005
29006 --Andrew Church
29007 achurch@achurch.org
29008 http://achurch.org/
29009
29010 >--===============0741629271==
29011 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
29012 > boundary="--6C8E23B332313752E4AEE203A92B350A"
29013 >
29014 >----6C8E23B332313752E4AEE203A92B350A
29015 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"
29016 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
29017 >
29018 >Hi guys,
29019 >We are again experiencing attacks on our services and we are having a lot of difficulty in finding a solution to the attacks. We would appreciate any help you could give us.
29020 >The logs are below: [Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29021 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"
29022 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29023 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29024 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29025 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"
29026 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29027 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29028 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"
29029 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29030 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"
29031 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"
29032 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"
29033 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29034 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"
29035 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29036 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29037 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"
29038 >[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set" A bot of some sort is sending messages to ChanServ and NickServ. Soon after this, the following messages are seen on the server and in the ircservices logs: (These are
29039 >the messages in the ircservices logs, and below them are the messages shown on the server) [Oct 24 22:25:31 2004] Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs
29040 >[Oct 24 22:25:31 2004] Network buffer size dropped below inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs normally
29041 >[Oct 24 22:25:31 2004] Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs
29042 >[20:31:09] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: services.teklan.com.tr has processed user/channel burst, sending topic burst.
29043 >[20:31:10] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: services.teklan.com.tr has processed topic burst (synched to network data).
29044 >[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs
29045 >[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size dropped below inactive threshold (85%), processing PRIVMSGs normally
29046 >[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs
29047 >[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size dropped below inactive threshold (85%), processing PRIVMSGs normally
29048 >[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs Straight after these messages, we receive this message:
29049 >[20:32:41] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Notice -- Max SendQ limit exceeded for services.teklan.com.tr: 2560046 > 2560000 [20:32:41] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: :Max Sendq exceeded for services.teklan.com.tr, closing link And the
29050 >services appear to terminate. When we connect to the server via ssh, we can see that ircservices is still running. 5 to 10 minutes later, the same attack continues but in a different form: Oct 24 22:24:45 2004] nickserv/main: Nwp registered by tgcdhh@84.2
29051 >34.138.142 (Uicmvu@hotmail.com)
29052 >[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat JagI@hotmail.com
29053 >[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Lszodjh@hotmail.com
29054 >[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Xltdl@hotmail.com
29055 >[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat EADnD@hotmail.com
29056 >[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr :register alitopuat Kqvwiz@hotmail.com This continues for a while and then again the services appear to terminate and later does. How can we prevent this? we currentl
29057 >y have over 7000 nicknames registered, which is highly unusual.
29058 >[22:28:32] -MasteR- Nicknames : 7669 records We would appreciate any help or support that you can give us.
29059 >Thank you so much for your time and help.
29060 >----6C8E23B332313752E4AEE203A92B350A
29061 >Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-9"
29062 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
29063 >
29064 ><P>Hi guys, <BR>We are again experiencing attacks on our services and we are having a lot of difficulty in finding a solution to the attacks. We would appreciate any help you could give us. <BR>The logs are below:</P> <P>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored mes
29065 >sage from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27
29066 >:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help
29067 >set"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message
29068 >from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004
29069 >] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oc
29070 >t 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ
29071 > :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P NickServ :info mrcoll"<BR>[Oct 24 22:27:08 2004] Ignored message from fgfsdfsd: ":fgfsdfsd P ChanServ :help set"</P> <P>A bot of some sort is
29072 >sending messages to ChanServ and NickServ. Soon after this, the following messages are seen on the server and in the ircservices logs:</P> <P>(These are the messages in the ircservices logs, and below them are the messages shown on the server)</P> <P>[Oct
29073 > 24 22:25:31 2004] Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs<BR>[Oct 24 22:25:31 2004] Network buffer size dropped below inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs normally<BR>[Oct 24 22:25:31 2004] Network buff
29074 >er size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs</P> <P><BR>[20:31:09] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: services.teklan.com.tr has processed user/channel burst, sending topic burst.<BR>[20:31:10] -irc.teklan.com
29075 >.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: services.teklan.com.tr has processed topic burst (synched to network data).<BR>[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size exceeded
29076 >inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs<BR>[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size dropped below inactive threshold (85%), processing PRIVMSGs normally<BR>[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** G
29077 >lobal -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs<BR>[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size dropped below inactive threshold (85%), p
29078 >rocessing PRIVMSGs normally<BR>[20:32:11] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Global -- from services.teklan.com.tr: Network buffer size exceeded inactive threshold (85%), not processing PRIVMSGs</P> <P>Straight after these messages, we receive this message:</P> <P><
29079 >BR>[20:32:41] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Notice -- Max SendQ limit exceeded for services.teklan.com.tr: 2560046 &gt; 2560000</P> <P>[20:32:41] -irc.teklan.com.tr- *** Routing -- from irc.teklan.com.tr: :Max Sendq exceeded for
29080 >services.teklan.com.tr, closing link</P> <P>And the services appear to terminate. When we connect to the server via ssh, we can see that ircservices is still running.</P> <P>5 to 10 minutes later, the same attack continues but in a different form:</P> <P>
29081 >Oct 24 22:24:45 2004] nickserv/main: Nwp registered by <A href="mailto:tgcdhh@84.234.138.142">tgcdhh@84.234.138.142</A> (<A href="mailto:Uicmvu@hotmail.com">Uicmvu@hotmail.com</A>)<BR>[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P <A href="mailt
29082 >o:NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr">NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr</A> :register alitopuat <A href="mailto:JagI@hotmail.com">JagI@hotmail.com</A><BR>[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P <A href="mailto:NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr">
29083 >NickServ@services.teklan.com.tr</A> :register alitopuat <A href="mailto:Lszodjh@hotmail.com">Lszodjh@hotmail.com</A><BR>[Oct 24 22:25:48 2004] Ignored message from Nwp: ":Nwp P <A
29084 From azoff at se.linux.org Mon Nov 22 00:10:41 2004
29085 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
29086 Date: Mon Nov 22 00:10:59 2004
29087 Subject: [IRCServices] Error in mailtransport
29088 Message-ID: <41A19F01.4060906@se.linux.org>
29089
29090 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
29091 Hash: SHA1
29092
29093 Hi!
29094
29095
29096 Just found out that there is a serious(?) flaw in mailhandeling. If the
29097 mailserver is down you won't get any mail when you register, and it's
29098 not placed in any queue so it wont be sent later when the mailserver is
29099 up again.
29100
29101
29102 ~From my logfile (I have replaced the hosts and username):
29103 [Nov 09 18:14:24 2004] nickserv/main: my_nick registered by
29104 my_nick@host.tld (user@host.tld)
29105 [Nov 09 18:14:26 2004] sockets: connect(1 -> mail.host.tld:25): No route
29106 to host
29107 [Nov 09 18:14:26 2004] mail/smtp: Connection to server failed for socket
29108 0x813d4f0
29109
29110 Andrew, is this something you could fix? Atleast add a backup server to use.
29111
29112 Thanks!
29113 - --
29114 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
29115 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
29116 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
29117 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
29118
29119 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29120 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
29121 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
29122
29123 iD8DBQFBoZ8AeY7jmtvbDP0RAoJcAJ9IG0Fyc6UfSRFa8NJCzZVJqssglgCgiEGz
29124 Emwegp5DsaX0dTeJb1/uSMs=
29125 =Oatp
29126 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
29127 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 22 18:51:32 2004
29128 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29129 Date: Mon Nov 22 01:51:58 2004
29130 Subject: [IRCServices] Error in mailtransport
29131 In-Reply-To: <41A19F01.4060906@se.linux.org>
29132 Message-ID: <41a1b6ba.27133@achurch.org>
29133
29134 >Just found out that there is a serious(?) flaw in mailhandeling. If the
29135 >mailserver is down you won't get any mail when you register, and it's
29136 >not placed in any queue so it wont be sent later when the mailserver is
29137 >up again.
29138
29139 This is by design. Queueing is the job of your mail server, not
29140 Services.
29141
29142 --Andrew Church
29143 achurch@achurch.org
29144 http://achurch.org/
29145 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 22 19:02:52 2004
29146 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29147 Date: Mon Nov 22 02:03:41 2004
29148 Subject: [IRCServices] Error in mailtransport
29149 In-Reply-To: <41A19F01.4060906@se.linux.org>
29150 Message-ID: <41a1b973.27147@achurch.org>
29151
29152 >Andrew, is this something you could fix? Atleast add a backup server to use.
29153
29154 Addendum: I've added support for multiple relay hosts in 5.0.42.
29155
29156 --Andrew Church
29157 achurch@achurch.org
29158 http://achurch.org/
29159 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 22 20:27:27 2004
29160 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29161 Date: Mon Nov 22 03:29:03 2004
29162 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 released
29163 Message-ID: <41a1cd79.53142@achurch.org>
29164
29165 Services 5.0.42 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
29166
29167 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
29168 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
29169
29170 4a6167a55336ee8d80acabe4b961c048 ircservices-5.0.42.tar.gz
29171 29252b75ca24574c4433c781d0d020a7 ircservices-5.0.42.diff.gz
29172 888d7151413e204d53679226b9761cb4 ircservices-5.0.42-1.i386.rpm
29173 6b4e75b92013ed5c518edafcbca4caa3 ircservices_5.0.42-1_i386.deb
29174
29175 The mirrors should have it shortly.
29176
29177 This release contains the accumulated fixes and updates from the
29178 period the homepage has been down. Please note in particular that the
29179 Japanese language file bug can be exploited by a user with Services
29180 operator privileges to crash Services; while Services operators are
29181 presumably trusted, users of Services should upgrade to this version as
29182 soon as convenient to avoid potential damage from malicious scripts or
29183 IRC client security holes.
29184
29185 Incidentally, as has already been pointed out to me privately, some of
29186 the mailing list web interface links still point to the .za.net domain.
29187 I'll work on getting these fixed as soon as possible.
29188
29189 Changes in version 5.0.42
29190 -------------------------
29191 2004/11/22 The mail/smtp module now allows multiple RelayHost
29192 configuration directives for backup relay servers.
29193 Suggested by Torbjorn Svennson <azoff@se.linux.org>
29194 2004/11/22 Fixed extraneous "Unknown message" log messages on Unreal.
29195 Reported by Ali Sor <alisor@softhome.net>
29196 2004/10/29 Clarified "please change your nick" message text.
29197 Suggested by Dylan v.d Merwe <dylanvdm@icon.co.za>
29198 2004/10/25 Fixed crash when using the Japanese language file with the
29199 OperServ SLINE COUNT command.
29200 2004/10/19 Fixed bug allowing StatServ and global noticer nicknames to
29201 be registered/linked. Reported by M. van Cuijk
29202 <mark@phedny.net>
29203 2004/10/14 Fixed various bugs and warnings when compiling on x86-64.
29204 Reported by <liverbugg@rinux.org>
29205 2004/10/14 Added workaround for GNU coreutils (>=5.2) brokenness.
29206 2004/10/13 SET MLOCK no longer allows locking +K without +i on Unreal.
29207 Reported by <help@thaiirc.in.th>
29208 2004/10/13 Fixed cosmetic bug in MemoServ IGNORE. Reported by
29209 <saman@ttnet.net.tr>
29210 2004/10/11 Fixed disconnect on incoming data flood. Reported by
29211 <ballsy@mystical.net>
29212 2004/10/03 Updated the README file for the current manual structure.
29213
29214 --Andrew Church
29215 achurch@achurch.org
29216 http://achurch.org/
29217 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Nov 22 10:28:38 2004
29218 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
29219 Date: Mon Nov 22 10:29:09 2004
29220 Subject: [IRCServices] Error in mailtransport
29221 In-Reply-To: <41A19F01.4060906@se.linux.org>
29222 References: <41A19F01.4060906@se.linux.org>
29223 Message-ID: <41A22FD6.7020102@winbot.co.uk>
29224
29225 i'd recommend using smtp rather than sendmail if you're doing this, so that your mailer daemon
29226 handles mail retries for you. If your own local mailserver is down this is more of a problem than a
29227 remote mailserver being down and will probably be fixed much faster.
29228
29229 Thanks,
29230 Craig
29231
29232 Torbj?rn Svensson wrote:
29233 > Hi!
29234 >
29235 >
29236 > Just found out that there is a serious(?) flaw in mailhandeling. If the
29237 > mailserver is down you won't get any mail when you register, and it's
29238 > not placed in any queue so it wont be sent later when the mailserver is
29239 > up again.
29240 >
29241 >
29242 > ~From my logfile (I have replaced the hosts and username):
29243 > [Nov 09 18:14:24 2004] nickserv/main: my_nick registered by
29244 > my_nick@host.tld (user@host.tld)
29245 > [Nov 09 18:14:26 2004] sockets: connect(1 -> mail.host.tld:25): No route
29246 > to host
29247 > [Nov 09 18:14:26 2004] mail/smtp: Connection to server failed for socket
29248 > 0x813d4f0
29249 >
29250 > Andrew, is this something you could fix? Atleast add a backup server to
29251 > use.
29252 >
29253 > Thanks!
29254 > --
29255 > ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
29256 > ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
29257 > ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
29258 > ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
29259 >
29260 ------------------------------------------------------------------
29261 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29262 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29263
29264 --
29265 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
29266 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
29267 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
29268 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
29269 --
29270 -------------- next part --------------
29271 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
29272 Name: signature.asc
29273 Type: application/pgp-signature
29274 Size: 187 bytes
29275 Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
29276 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20041122/44b42d1b/signature.pgp
29277 From ianj at esper.net Tue Nov 23 10:31:12 2004
29278 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
29279 Date: Tue Nov 23 10:31:41 2004
29280 Subject: [IRCServices] Error in mailtransport
29281 In-Reply-To: <41A22FD6.7020102@winbot.co.uk>
29282 References: <41A19F01.4060906@se.linux.org> <41A22FD6.7020102@winbot.co.uk>
29283 Message-ID: <41A381F0.4030201@esper.net>
29284
29285 Craig Edwards wrote:
29286 > i'd recommend using smtp rather than sendmail if you're doing this, so
29287 > that your mailer daemon handles mail retries for you. If your own local
29288 > mailserver is down this is more of a problem than a remote mailserver
29289 > being down and will probably be fixed much faster.
29290
29291 Given your explanation, wouldn't it make more sense to use sendmail to
29292 submit? The sendmail process would submit it to your local machine's
29293 queue, then the MTA on that machine would either send it out or
29294 smarthost it, depending on the configuration. And if the remote server
29295 or smart host were down, the message would be in the local machine's
29296 MTA's queue, per what Andy said. It's better to let your MTA handle
29297 queueing of mail since that's specifically what it's designed to do. ;)
29298
29299 The only issue I would see with the "sendmail" method is that it may not
29300 work with all MTAs. Sendmail, Postfix and Exim probably fare the best
29301 at sendmail-style submission. I'm not 100% sure about qmail; I don't
29302 use it myself for... various reasons. ;) (Andy will likely concur with
29303 me for many of the same reasons.)
29304
29305 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
29306
29307 -----
29308 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official
29309 EsperNet business)
29310 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
29311 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
29312
29313 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
29314
29315 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Nov 24 11:50:24 2004
29316 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29317 Date: Tue Nov 23 18:52:56 2004
29318 Subject: [IRCServices] Error in mailtransport
29319 In-Reply-To: <41A381F0.4030201@esper.net>
29320 Message-ID: <41a3f777.73400@achurch.org>
29321
29322 Another thing that should be mentioned about the sendmail module is
29323 that it blocks until the sendmail process exits, which can cause
29324 significant problems if your sendmail program does anything other than just
29325 queue the message. To be honest, I only wrote the sendmail module as a
29326 backup in case the SMTP module couldn't be used for some reason (like a
29327 site that doesn't use SMTP for mail).
29328
29329 --Andrew Church
29330 achurch@achurch.org
29331 http://achurch.org/
29332
29333 >Craig Edwards wrote:
29334 >> i'd recommend using smtp rather than sendmail if you're doing this, so
29335 >> that your mailer daemon handles mail retries for you. If your own local
29336 >> mailserver is down this is more of a problem than a remote mailserver
29337 >> being down and will probably be fixed much faster.
29338 >
29339 >Given your explanation, wouldn't it make more sense to use sendmail to
29340 >submit? The sendmail process would submit it to your local machine's
29341 >queue, then the MTA on that machine would either send it out or
29342 >smarthost it, depending on the configuration. And if the remote server
29343 >or smart host were down, the message would be in the local machine's
29344 >MTA's queue, per what Andy said. It's better to let your MTA handle
29345 >queueing of mail since that's specifically what it's designed to do. ;)
29346 >
29347 >The only issue I would see with the "sendmail" method is that it may not
29348 >work with all MTAs. Sendmail, Postfix and Exim probably fare the best
29349 >at sendmail-style submission. I'm not 100% sure about qmail; I don't
29350 >use it myself for... various reasons. ;) (Andy will likely concur with
29351 >me for many of the same reasons.)
29352 >
29353 >--Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
29354 >
29355 >-----
29356 >Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official
29357 >EsperNet business)
29358 >Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
29359 >Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
29360 >
29361 >PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
29362 >
29363 >------------------------------------------------------------------
29364 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29365 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29366 From us44ever at hotmail.com Wed Dec 1 03:09:46 2004
29367 From: us44ever at hotmail.com (us44ever .)
29368 Date: Wed Dec 1 03:10:41 2004
29369 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29370 In-Reply-To: <41a1cd79.53142@achurch.org>
29371 Message-ID: <BAY10-F918E65ED5AD5BF871B9E0CDBF0@phx.gbl>
29372
29373 i get this error while compiling (upgrading from 5.0.41)
29374 gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log
29375 -c version.c -o version.o
29376 gcc -rdynamic actions.o channels.o commands.o compat.o conffile.o encrypt.o
29377 ignore.o init.o language.o log.o main.o memory.o messages.o misc.o modes.o
29378 modules.o process.o send.o servers.o signals.o sockets.o suspinfo.o
29379 timeout.o users.o version.o -o ircservices
29380 log.o: In function `vlogprintf':
29381 /usr/home/xxx/ircservices-5.0.42/log.c:103: undefined reference to `va_copy'
29382 gmake: *** [ircservices] Error 1
29383
29384
29385 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Dec 1 08:38:50 2004
29386 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
29387 Date: Wed Dec 1 08:39:09 2004
29388 Subject: [IRCServices] SGLINE and unrealircd
29389 In-Reply-To: <BAY10-F918E65ED5AD5BF871B9E0CDBF0@phx.gbl>
29390 Message-ID: <20041201163850.29662.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com>
29391
29392 IrcServices supports realname bans with the sgline
29393 command but on UnrealIrcd only issues kill commands
29394 when a banned nickname is connected to the network.
29395 Unrealircd IS supporting realname bans and this should
29396 be added to ircservices too:
29397
29398 ***** Svsnline *****
29399 -
29400 Adds a global realname ban.
29401 Must be sent through an U:Lined server.
29402 The reason must be a single parameter therefore
29403 spaces are indicated by _, Unreal will internally
29404 translate these to spaces
29405 Syntax: SVSNLINE +/- <reason_for_ban> :<realname>
29406 Example: SVSNLINE + sub7_drone :*sub7*
29407 -
29408
29409
29410 =====
29411 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
29412 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Dec 2 11:46:38 2004
29413 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29414 Date: Wed Dec 1 18:47:08 2004
29415 Subject: [IRCServices] SGLINE and unrealircd
29416 In-Reply-To: <20041201163850.29662.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com>
29417 Message-ID: <41ae821c.03703@achurch.org>
29418
29419 Fixed, thanks for the report.
29420
29421 --Andrew Church
29422 achurch@achurch.org
29423 http://achurch.org/
29424
29425 >IrcServices supports realname bans with the sgline
29426 >command but on UnrealIrcd only issues kill commands
29427 >when a banned nickname is connected to the network.
29428 >Unrealircd IS supporting realname bans and this should
29429 >be added to ircservices too:
29430 >
29431 >***** Svsnline *****
29432 >-
29433 > Adds a global realname ban.
29434 > Must be sent through an U:Lined server.
29435 > The reason must be a single parameter therefore
29436 > spaces are indicated by _, Unreal will internally
29437 > translate these to spaces
29438 > Syntax: SVSNLINE +/- <reason_for_ban> :<realname>
29439 > Example: SVSNLINE + sub7_drone :*sub7*
29440 > -
29441 >
29442 >
29443 >=====
29444 >Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
29445 >------------------------------------------------------------------
29446 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29447 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29448 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Dec 2 11:48:53 2004
29449 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29450 Date: Wed Dec 1 18:51:04 2004
29451 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29452 In-Reply-To: <BAY10-F918E65ED5AD5BF871B9E0CDBF0@phx.gbl>
29453 Message-ID: <41ae8311.03714@achurch.org>
29454
29455 >i get this error while compiling (upgrading from 5.0.41)
29456 >gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log
29457 >-c version.c -o version.o
29458 >gcc -rdynamic actions.o channels.o commands.o compat.o conffile.o encrypt.o
29459 >ignore.o init.o language.o log.o main.o memory.o messages.o misc.o modes.o
29460 >modules.o process.o send.o servers.o signals.o sockets.o suspinfo.o
29461 >timeout.o users.o version.o -o ircservices
29462 >log.o: In function `vlogprintf':
29463 >/usr/home/xxx/ircservices-5.0.42/log.c:103: undefined reference to `va_copy'
29464 >gmake: *** [ircservices] Error 1
29465
29466 It looks like your compiler doesn't support va_copy (which is part of
29467 the C99 standard). I'll add a workaround in the next release, but it will
29468 disappear again in version 5.1, so I would recommend upgrading your
29469 compiler.
29470
29471 --Andrew Church
29472 achurch@achurch.org
29473 http://achurch.org/
29474 From smkelly at zombie.org Wed Dec 1 19:50:06 2004
29475 From: smkelly at zombie.org (Sean Kelly)
29476 Date: Wed Dec 1 19:50:14 2004
29477 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29478 In-Reply-To: <41ae8311.03714@achurch.org>
29479 References: <BAY10-F918E65ED5AD5BF871B9E0CDBF0@phx.gbl>
29480 <41ae8311.03714@achurch.org>
29481 Message-ID: <20041202035006.GA42193@edgemaster.zombie.org>
29482
29483 On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:48:53AM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
29484 > >i get this error while compiling (upgrading from 5.0.41)
29485 > >gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log
29486 > >-c version.c -o version.o
29487 > >gcc -rdynamic actions.o channels.o commands.o compat.o conffile.o encrypt.o
29488 > >ignore.o init.o language.o log.o main.o memory.o messages.o misc.o modes.o
29489 > >modules.o process.o send.o servers.o signals.o sockets.o suspinfo.o
29490 > >timeout.o users.o version.o -o ircservices
29491 > >log.o: In function `vlogprintf':
29492 > >/usr/home/xxx/ircservices-5.0.42/log.c:103: undefined reference to `va_copy'
29493 > >gmake: *** [ircservices] Error 1
29494 >
29495 > It looks like your compiler doesn't support va_copy (which is part of
29496 > the C99 standard). I'll add a workaround in the next release, but it will
29497 > disappear again in version 5.1, so I would recommend upgrading your
29498 > compiler.
29499
29500 I hit this in FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE (gcc 2.95.4). The solution was to just
29501 suck it up and install /usr/ports/lang/gcc34/ and build services with the
29502 /usr/local/bin/gcc34 binary.
29503
29504 --
29505 Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
29506 smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org
29507 -------------- next part --------------
29508 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
29509 Name: not available
29510 Type: application/pgp-signature
29511 Size: 187 bytes
29512 Desc: not available
29513 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20041201/b26004a5/attachment.pgp
29514 From brain at winbot.co.uk Sat Dec 4 02:08:47 2004
29515 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
29516 Date: Sat Dec 4 02:09:20 2004
29517 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29518 In-Reply-To: <20041202035006.GA42193@edgemaster.zombie.org>
29519 References: <BAY10-F918E65ED5AD5BF871B9E0CDBF0@phx.gbl> <41ae8311.03714@achurch.org>
29520 <20041202035006.GA42193@edgemaster.zombie.org>
29521 Message-ID: <41B18CAF.2080605@winbot.co.uk>
29522
29523 2.95.4 is very VERY old. Do you get problems with a lot of compiles using this? I had enough
29524 problems with 2.96 on redhat 7...
29525
29526 Sean Kelly wrote:
29527 > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:48:53AM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
29528 >
29529 >>>i get this error while compiling (upgrading from 5.0.41)
29530 >>>gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin-log
29531 >>>-c version.c -o version.o
29532 >>>gcc -rdynamic actions.o channels.o commands.o compat.o conffile.o encrypt.o
29533 >>>ignore.o init.o language.o log.o main.o memory.o messages.o misc.o modes.o
29534 >>>modules.o process.o send.o servers.o signals.o sockets.o suspinfo.o
29535 >>>timeout.o users.o version.o -o ircservices
29536 >>>log.o: In function `vlogprintf':
29537 >>>/usr/home/xxx/ircservices-5.0.42/log.c:103: undefined reference to `va_copy'
29538 >>>gmake: *** [ircservices] Error 1
29539 >>
29540 >> It looks like your compiler doesn't support va_copy (which is part of
29541 >>the C99 standard). I'll add a workaround in the next release, but it will
29542 >>disappear again in version 5.1, so I would recommend upgrading your
29543 >>compiler.
29544 >
29545 >
29546 > I hit this in FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE (gcc 2.95.4). The solution was to just
29547 > suck it up and install /usr/ports/lang/gcc34/ and build services with the
29548 > /usr/local/bin/gcc34 binary.
29549 >
29550 >
29551 >
29552 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
29553 >
29554 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
29555 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29556 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29557
29558 --
29559 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
29560 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
29561 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
29562 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
29563 --
29564 -------------- next part --------------
29565 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
29566 Name: signature.asc
29567 Type: application/pgp-signature
29568 Size: 187 bytes
29569 Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
29570 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20041204/8534ba09/signature.pgp
29571 From us44ever at hotmail.com Sat Dec 4 11:01:38 2004
29572 From: us44ever at hotmail.com (us44ever .)
29573 Date: Sat Dec 4 11:02:33 2004
29574 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29575 In-Reply-To: <41B18CAF.2080605@winbot.co.uk>
29576 Message-ID: <BAY10-F50C41B3F4A0FD23F1C5FA1CDB20@phx.gbl>
29577
29578 the problem is that i don't own the server! i just have a shell account from
29579 a shell provider (lomag) and they use the standard gcc of freebsd4.9 :(
29580 this was their reply when i tried to contacted them...
29581
29582 -
29583 We use the standard gcc in FreeBSD 4.x and it is indeed old but I can not
29584 change it unless we upgrade to FreeBSD 5.x which will not happen anytime
29585 soon since it is still unstable. My best suggestion is to download a
29586 precompiled version for FreeBSD if available.
29587 -
29588
29589 any solution please? ;`(
29590
29591 >From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
29592 >Reply-To: brain@winbot.co.uk,IRC Services General Mailing List
29593 ><ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
29594 >To: IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
29595 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29596 >Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 10:08:47 +0000
29597 >
29598 >2.95.4 is very VERY old. Do you get problems with a lot of compiles using
29599 >this? I had enough problems with 2.96 on redhat 7...
29600 >
29601 >Sean Kelly wrote:
29602 >>On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:48:53AM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
29603 >>
29604 >>>>i get this error while compiling (upgrading from 5.0.41)
29605 >>>>gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
29606 >>>>-fno-builtin-log -c version.c -o version.o
29607 >>>>gcc -rdynamic actions.o channels.o commands.o compat.o conffile.o
29608 >>>>encrypt.o ignore.o init.o language.o log.o main.o memory.o messages.o
29609 >>>>misc.o modes.o modules.o process.o send.o servers.o signals.o sockets.o
29610 >>>>suspinfo.o timeout.o users.o version.o -o ircservices
29611 >>>>log.o: In function `vlogprintf':
29612 >>>>/usr/home/xxx/ircservices-5.0.42/log.c:103: undefined reference to
29613 >>>>`va_copy'
29614 >>>>gmake: *** [ircservices] Error 1
29615 >>>
29616 >>> It looks like your compiler doesn't support va_copy (which is part
29617 >>>of
29618 >>>the C99 standard). I'll add a workaround in the next release, but it
29619 >>>will
29620 >>>disappear again in version 5.1, so I would recommend upgrading your
29621 >>>compiler.
29622 >>
29623 >>
29624 >>I hit this in FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE (gcc 2.95.4). The solution was to just
29625 >>suck it up and install /usr/ports/lang/gcc34/ and build services with the
29626 >>/usr/local/bin/gcc34 binary.
29627 >>
29628 >>
29629 >>
29630 >>------------------------------------------------------------------------
29631 >>
29632 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
29633 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29634 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29635 >
29636 >--
29637 >WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
29638 >ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
29639 >InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
29640 >Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
29641 >--
29642 ><< signature.asc >>
29643 >------------------------------------------------------------------
29644 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29645 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29646
29647
29648 From list at psam.se Sat Dec 4 12:14:13 2004
29649 From: list at psam.se (list)
29650 Date: Sat Dec 4 12:15:00 2004
29651 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29652 In-Reply-To: <BAY10-F50C41B3F4A0FD23F1C5FA1CDB20@phx.gbl>
29653 References: <BAY10-F50C41B3F4A0FD23F1C5FA1CDB20@phx.gbl>
29654 Message-ID: <41B21A95.1010809@psam.se>
29655
29656 us44ever . skrev:
29657
29658 > the problem is that i don't own the server! i just have a shell
29659 > account from a shell provider (lomag) and they use the standard gcc of
29660 > freebsd4.9 :(
29661 > this was their reply when i tried to contacted them...
29662 >
29663 > -
29664 > We use the standard gcc in FreeBSD 4.x and it is indeed old but I can
29665 > not change it unless we upgrade to FreeBSD 5.x which will not happen
29666 > anytime soon since it is still unstable. My best suggestion is to
29667 > download a precompiled version for FreeBSD if available.
29668 > -
29669 >
29670 > any solution please? ;`(
29671 >
29672 >> From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
29673 >> Reply-To: brain@winbot.co.uk,IRC Services General Mailing List
29674 >> <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
29675 >> To: IRC Services General Mailing List
29676 >> <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
29677 >> Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29678 >> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 10:08:47 +0000
29679 >>
29680 >> 2.95.4 is very VERY old. Do you get problems with a lot of compiles
29681 >> using this? I had enough problems with 2.96 on redhat 7...
29682 >>
29683 >> Sean Kelly wrote:
29684 >>
29685 >>> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:48:53AM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
29686 >>>
29687 >>>>> i get this error while compiling (upgrading from 5.0.41)
29688 >>>>> gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
29689 >>>>> -fno-builtin-log -c version.c -o version.o
29690 >>>>> gcc -rdynamic actions.o channels.o commands.o compat.o conffile.o
29691 >>>>> encrypt.o ignore.o init.o language.o log.o main.o memory.o
29692 >>>>> messages.o misc.o modes.o modules.o process.o send.o servers.o
29693 >>>>> signals.o sockets.o suspinfo.o timeout.o users.o version.o -o
29694 >>>>> ircservices
29695 >>>>> log.o: In function `vlogprintf':
29696 >>>>> /usr/home/xxx/ircservices-5.0.42/log.c:103: undefined reference to
29697 >>>>> `va_copy'
29698 >>>>> gmake: *** [ircservices] Error 1
29699 >>>>
29700 >>>>
29701 >>>> It looks like your compiler doesn't support va_copy (which is
29702 >>>> part of
29703 >>>> the C99 standard). I'll add a workaround in the next release, but
29704 >>>> it will
29705 >>>> disappear again in version 5.1, so I would recommend upgrading your
29706 >>>> compiler.
29707 >>>
29708 >>>
29709 >>>
29710 >>> I hit this in FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE (gcc 2.95.4). The solution was to just
29711 >>> suck it up and install /usr/ports/lang/gcc34/ and build services
29712 >>> with the
29713 >>> /usr/local/bin/gcc34 binary.
29714 >>>
29715 >>>
29716 >>>
29717 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
29718 >>>
29719 >>>
29720 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
29721 >>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29722 >>> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29723 >>
29724 >>
29725 >> --
29726 >> WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
29727 >> ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
29728 >> InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
29729 >> Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
29730 >> --
29731 >> << signature.asc >>
29732 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
29733 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29734 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29735 >
29736 >
29737 >
29738 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
29739 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29740 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29741 >
29742 >
29743 Ask them if they can install the port for gcc 3.4, it is in the
29744 portsystem and they dont have to remove the system gcc. They can use
29745 them both at the same time. Its just a matter for you then to use the
29746 right gcc. When they install it through the port it will be in
29747 /usr/local/bin/gcc34 and thus not intefer with the system gcc that is in
29748 /usr/bin/gcc
29749
29750 I hope you can convince them to do this.
29751
29752 Psadi
29753
29754 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun Dec 5 10:42:57 2004
29755 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
29756 Date: Sun Dec 5 10:43:14 2004
29757 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29758 Message-ID: <20041205184311.69849CB44D3@sakura.ian-justman.com>
29759
29760 hmm, i've downloaded the GCC source and configured with --prefix=/home/craig causing it to compile binaries into my user area, from there, configged the ircservices ./configure to use those binaries, maybe you could do the same.
29761
29762 As a note, what was said about FreeBSD 5.x being unstable seems to just be an excuse NOT to update, 5.x is currently more stable than 4.x and seeing as they are classed as official releases, i doubt the FreeBSD teams would release unstable distros with -RELEASE assigned to them.
29763
29764 /****************************************
29765 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
29766 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
29767 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
29768 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
29769 ****************************************/
29770
29771
29772 /****************************************
29773 * From - us44ever . <us44ever@hotmail.com>
29774 * To - ircservices@ircservices.esper.net <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
29775 * Sent - 19:01:38 @ 2004-12-04
29776 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29777 ****************************************/
29778
29779 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
29780
29781 >the problem is that i don't own the server! i just have a shell account from
29782 >a shell provider (lomag) and they use the standard gcc of freebsd4.9 :(
29783 >this was their reply when i tried to contacted them...
29784 >
29785 >-
29786 >We use the standard gcc in FreeBSD 4.x and it is indeed old but I can not
29787 >change it unless we upgrade to FreeBSD 5.x which will not happen anytime
29788 >soon since it is still unstable. My best suggestion is to download a
29789 >precompiled version for FreeBSD if available.
29790 >-
29791 >
29792 >any solution please? ;`(
29793 >
29794 >>From: Craig Edwards <brain@winbot.co.uk>
29795 >>Reply-To: brain@winbot.co.uk,IRC Services General Mailing List
29796 >><ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
29797 >>To: IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
29798 >>Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29799 >>Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 10:08:47 +0000
29800 >>
29801 >>2.95.4 is very VERY old. Do you get problems with a lot of compiles using
29802 >>this? I had enough problems with 2.96 on redhat 7...
29803 >>
29804 >>Sean Kelly wrote:
29805 >>>On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:48:53AM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
29806 >>>
29807 >>>>>i get this error while compiling (upgrading from 5.0.41)
29808 >>>>>gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
29809 >>>>>-fno-builtin-log -c version.c -o version.o
29810 >>>>>gcc -rdynamic actions.o channels.o commands.o compat.o conffile.o
29811 >>>>>encrypt.o ignore.o init.o language.o log.o main.o memory.o messages.o
29812 >>>>>misc.o modes.o modules.o process.o send.o servers.o signals.o sockets.o
29813 >>>>>suspinfo.o timeout.o users.o version.o -o ircservices
29814 >>>>>log.o: In function `vlogprintf':
29815 >>>>>/usr/home/xxx/ircservices-5.0.42/log.c:103: undefined reference to
29816 >>>>>`va_copy'
29817 >>>>>gmake: *** [ircservices] Error 1
29818 >>>>
29819 >>>> It looks like your compiler doesn't support va_copy (which is part
29820 >>>>of
29821 >>>>the C99 standard). I'll add a workaround in the next release, but it
29822 >>>>will
29823 >>>>disappear again in version 5.1, so I would recommend upgrading your
29824 >>>>compiler.
29825 >>>
29826 >>>
29827 >>>I hit this in FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE (gcc 2.95.4). The solution was to just
29828 >>>suck it up and install /usr/ports/lang/gcc34/ and build services with the
29829 >>>/usr/local/bin/gcc34 binary.
29830 >>>
29831 >>>
29832 >>>
29833 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
29834 >>>
29835 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
29836 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29837 >>>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29838 >>
29839 >>--
29840 >>WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
29841 >>ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
29842 >>InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
29843 >>Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
29844 >>--
29845 >><< signature.asc >>
29846 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
29847 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29848 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29849 >
29850 >
29851 >------------------------------------------------------------------
29852 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
29853 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
29854
29855 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
29856
29857 From smkelly at zombie.org Sun Dec 5 12:21:37 2004
29858 From: smkelly at zombie.org (Sean Kelly)
29859 Date: Sun Dec 5 12:21:47 2004
29860 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.42 error in compiling
29861 In-Reply-To: <20041205184311.69849CB44D3@sakura.ian-justman.com>
29862 References: <20041205184311.69849CB44D3@sakura.ian-justman.com>
29863 Message-ID: <20041205202137.GA61879@edgemaster.zombie.org>
29864
29865 On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Craig McLure wrote:
29866 > As a note, what was said about FreeBSD 5.x being unstable seems to just be an excuse NOT to update, 5.x is currently more stable than 4.x and seeing as they are classed as official releases, i doubt the FreeBSD teams would release unstable distros with -RELEASE assigned to them.
29867
29868 I disagree.
29869
29870 We did unstable releases with 5.0-RELEASE, 5.1-RELEASE, 5.2-RELEASE, and 5.2.1-RELEASE.
29871 These were considered "Early Adopter" releases.
29872
29873 While it is classed as a "normal" release, 5.3-RELEASE is still the very
29874 first "stable" release of FreeBSD 5.x. The migration process from 4.x to
29875 5.x is not exactly trivial, and there is still at least one more FreeBSD
29876 4.x release scheduled tentatively for the first month or two of next year.
29877 It is justifiable that some would choose to sit out on 5.3 and wait for
29878 more stabilization of FreeBSD 5. There is still considerable work going
29879 on in HEAD that will make or has made its way back into RELENG_5.
29880
29881 FreeBSD 5.3 is still less stable than 4.x under some conditions, most
29882 notably is ACPI. There is still a lot of locking going on as well, and one
29883 might find it to be slower than FreeBSD 4.x, especially on uniprocessor
29884 enviornments. This is being worked on in HEAD. Currently, work is underway
29885 to push Giant down deeper into filesystems and VFS, not to mention other
29886 places such as the network stack.
29887
29888 One thing worth mentioning is that FreeBSD 4.9 is no longer supported by
29889 the FreeBSD Security Officer. It might be worth your time suggesting to
29890 your colocation provider that they upgrade to FreeBSD 4.10 since it will be
29891 supported through May 31, 2006 and is a mostly painless upgrade. The
29892 FreeBSD Security Officer has a page showing all supported releases and the
29893 dates they will be supported through. You can find that page here:
29894 http://www.FreeBSD.org/security/
29895
29896 That said, I think I've strayed off the topic of this list enough.
29897
29898 --
29899 Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
29900 smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org
29901 -------------- next part --------------
29902 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
29903 Name: not available
29904 Type: application/pgp-signature
29905 Size: 187 bytes
29906 Desc: not available
29907 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20041205/99d34f61/attachment.pgp
29908 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Dec 10 16:31:17 2004
29909 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29910 Date: Thu Dec 9 23:34:40 2004
29911 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.43 released
29912 Message-ID: <41b9518a.27173@achurch.org>
29913
29914 Services 5.0.43 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
29915
29916 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
29917 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
29918
29919 ec5555a21e2c2ecca7b8a46d6639029b ircservices-5.0.43.tar.gz
29920 916bc58aa7d16bfd331b55dc81d89162 ircservices-5.0.43.diff.gz
29921 4b8f1e6c27bcf80725536cf146d740b8 ircservices-5.0.43-1.i386.rpm
29922 2d3e55cd53d023912bcab4502f9c28fd ircservices_5.0.43-1_i386.deb
29923
29924 The mirrors should have it shortly.
29925
29926 This release is primarily to deal with complaints that Services no
29927 longer compiles under GCC 2.95. A workaround has been added for this
29928 release, with the side effect that log messages will no longer be written
29929 to stderr when -nofork is used (only for such compilers). This workaround
29930 will disappear in Services 5.1, so users of such old compilers are
29931 recommended to upgrade to GCC 3.2 or later as soon as convenient.
29932
29933 Changes in version 5.0.43
29934 -------------------------
29935 2004/12/02 Added workaround for va_copy with obsolete compilers.
29936 Reported by <us44ever@hotmail.com>
29937 2004/12/02 Added support for SGlines on Unreal. Reported by Dionisios
29938 K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
29939 2004/12/02 Fixed "unknown message" on Unreal SWHOIS. Reported by
29940 Anton Wolkov <phan70m@gmail.com>
29941 2004/11/22 Fixed URLs in the documentation to point to the new website.
29942
29943 --Andrew Church
29944 achurch@achurch.org
29945 http://achurch.org/
29946 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Dec 10 03:14:22 2004
29947 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
29948 Date: Fri Dec 10 03:14:37 2004
29949 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
29950 References: <41b9518a.27173@achurch.org>
29951 Message-ID: <002701c4dea9$69553e50$084405d5@server>
29952
29953 When OpNotice feature is enabled, ChanServ sends channel notices to all
29954 users and not only to channel operators.
29955
29956 -ChanServ:#testa- DEOP command used for Me by Me
29957
29958 This Must Be:
29959
29960 -ChanServ:@#testa- DEOP command used for Me by Me
29961
29962 -Tested On UnrealIrcd3.2.2-
29963
29964 I also think opnotices should be sent when the akick (add/del) command is
29965 used..
29966
29967
29968 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Dec 10 03:59:53 2004
29969 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
29970 Date: Fri Dec 10 04:00:23 2004
29971 Subject: [IRCServices] Logon/Oper News Bug
29972 Message-ID: <005601c4deaf$c90c0df0$084405d5@server>
29973
29974 On /Os LogonNews HELP and /Os OperNews HELP commands OperServ says:
29975
29976
29977 -OperServ- OPERNEWS LIST may be used by any IRC operator to list the
29978 -
29979 -OperServ- current news messages. ADD and DEL may only be used by
29980 -
29981 -OperServ- Services administrators.
29982
29983 ------
29984
29985 -OperServ- LOGONNEWS LIST may be used by any IRC operator to list the
29986 -
29987 -OperServ- current news messages. ADD and DEL may only be used by
29988 -
29989 -OperServ- Services administrators.
29990
29991
29992
29993 THIS IS WRONG BECAUSE SERVICES OPERATORS CAN ADD/DEL LOGON AND OPER NEWS
29994
29995
29996
29997 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Dec 10 21:16:02 2004
29998 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
29999 Date: Fri Dec 10 04:16:49 2004
30000 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30001 In-Reply-To: <002701c4dea9$69553e50$084405d5@server>
30002 Message-ID: <41b993a3.27317@achurch.org>
30003
30004 >When OpNotice feature is enabled, ChanServ sends channel notices to all
30005 >users and not only to channel operators.
30006
30007 This is by design.
30008
30009 --Andrew Church
30010 achurch@achurch.org
30011 http://achurch.org/
30012 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Dec 10 04:18:21 2004
30013 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
30014 Date: Fri Dec 10 04:18:39 2004
30015 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30016 References: <41b993a3.27317@achurch.org>
30017 Message-ID: <000601c4deb2$59cc1b30$084405d5@server>
30018
30019 Yes but it's wrong.
30020 On large channels is really a problem:(
30021
30022 ----- Original Message -----
30023 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
30024 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30025 Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:16 PM
30026 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30027
30028
30029 > >When OpNotice feature is enabled, ChanServ sends channel notices to all
30030 >>users and not only to channel operators.
30031 >
30032 > This is by design.
30033 >
30034 > --Andrew Church
30035 > achurch@achurch.org
30036 > http://achurch.org/
30037 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
30038 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30039 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30040 >
30041
30042 From phan70m at gmail.com Fri Dec 10 04:20:30 2004
30043 From: phan70m at gmail.com (Anton Wolkov)
30044 Date: Fri Dec 10 04:20:44 2004
30045 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30046 In-Reply-To: <000601c4deb2$59cc1b30$084405d5@server>
30047 References: <41b993a3.27317@achurch.org>
30048 <000601c4deb2$59cc1b30$084405d5@server>
30049 Message-ID: <d50f59a004121004204dcc8a8c@mail.gmail.com>
30050
30051 Then simply disable opnotice or the OP/DEOP commands altogether.
30052
30053
30054 On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:18:21 +0200, Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr> wrote:
30055 > Yes but it's wrong.
30056 > On large channels is really a problem:(
30057 >
30058 >
30059 >
30060 > ----- Original Message -----
30061 > From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
30062 > To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30063 > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:16 PM
30064 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30065 >
30066 > > >When OpNotice feature is enabled, ChanServ sends channel notices to all
30067 > >>users and not only to channel operators.
30068 > >
30069 > > This is by design.
30070 > >
30071 > > --Andrew Church
30072 > > achurch@achurch.org
30073 > > http://achurch.org/
30074 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
30075 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30076 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30077 > >
30078 >
30079 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
30080 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30081 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30082 >
30083 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Dec 10 04:28:38 2004
30084 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
30085 Date: Fri Dec 10 04:28:57 2004
30086 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30087 References: <41b993a3.27317@achurch.org><000601c4deb2$59cc1b30$084405d5@server>
30088 <d50f59a004121004204dcc8a8c@mail.gmail.com>
30089 Message-ID: <002b01c4deb3$c99abc90$084405d5@server>
30090
30091 Yes..
30092 And when i have a headache i should cut my head. Right?
30093
30094 ----- Original Message -----
30095 From: "Anton Wolkov" <phan70m@gmail.com>
30096 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30097 Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:20 PM
30098 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30099
30100
30101 > Then simply disable opnotice or the OP/DEOP commands altogether.
30102 >
30103 >
30104 > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:18:21 +0200, Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
30105 > wrote:
30106 >> Yes but it's wrong.
30107 >> On large channels is really a problem:(
30108 >>
30109 >>
30110 >>
30111 >> ----- Original Message -----
30112 >> From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
30113 >> To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30114 >> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:16 PM
30115 >> Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30116 >>
30117 >> > >When OpNotice feature is enabled, ChanServ sends channel notices to
30118 >> > >all
30119 >> >>users and not only to channel operators.
30120 >> >
30121 >> > This is by design.
30122 >> >
30123 >> > --Andrew Church
30124 >> > achurch@achurch.org
30125 >> > http://achurch.org/
30126 >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
30127 >> > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30128 >> > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30129 >> >
30130 >>
30131 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
30132 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30133 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30134 >>
30135 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
30136 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30137 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30138 >
30139
30140
30141 From medice at gmx.at Fri Dec 10 04:41:34 2004
30142 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
30143 Date: Fri Dec 10 04:40:23 2004
30144 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30145 In-Reply-To: <002b01c4deb3$c99abc90$084405d5@server>
30146 References: <41b993a3.27317@achurch.org><000601c4deb2$59cc1b30$084405d5@server> <d50f59a004121004204dcc8a8c@mail.gmail.com>
30147 <002b01c4deb3$c99abc90$084405d5@server>
30148 Message-ID: <41B9997E.9080004@gmx.at>
30149
30150 Dionisios K. wrote:
30151 > Yes..
30152 > And when i have a headache i should cut my head. Right?
30153 >
30154
30155 No - stop smashing your head against the wall ;)
30156
30157 From horizon at regina.accessirc.net Fri Dec 10 09:12:31 2004
30158 From: horizon at regina.accessirc.net (Horizon)
30159 Date: Fri Dec 10 09:12:50 2004
30160 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices and FC2
30161 In-Reply-To: <41b9518a.27173@achurch.org>
30162 References: <41b9518a.27173@achurch.org>
30163 Message-ID: <38184.65.87.239.42.1102698751.squirrel@65.87.239.42>
30164
30165 Hello,
30166
30167 Has anyone had experience running ircservices on Fedora Core 2. Any
30168 problems or issues that one should know about? Any info would be
30169 helpful
30170
30171
30172 Alex
30173
30174
30175
30176 From ballsy at mystical.net Fri Dec 10 09:19:31 2004
30177 From: ballsy at mystical.net (David Ball)
30178 Date: Fri Dec 10 09:23:55 2004
30179 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices and FC2
30180 In-Reply-To: <38184.65.87.239.42.1102698751.squirrel@65.87.239.42>
30181 References: <41b9518a.27173@achurch.org>
30182 <38184.65.87.239.42.1102698751.squirrel@65.87.239.42>
30183 Message-ID: <200412101019310451.8D0E6F50@smtp.messaging.ca.mci.com>
30184
30185 I'm running 5.0.41 (yeah yeah, I know) on FC2 (a shell account, mind you....not my own machine) with no issues thus far. I've upgraded it using the patches a few times and all is still well.
30186
30187 David
30188
30189
30190 *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
30191
30192 On 10/12/2004 at 11:12 AM Horizon wrote:
30193
30194 >Hello,
30195 >
30196 > Has anyone had experience running ircservices on Fedora Core 2. Any
30197 >problems or issues that one should know about? Any info would be
30198 >helpful
30199 >
30200 >
30201 >Alex
30202 >
30203 >
30204 >
30205 >------------------------------------------------------------------
30206 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30207 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30208
30209
30210
30211
30212 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Dec 10 09:27:55 2004
30213 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
30214 Date: Fri Dec 10 09:33:54 2004
30215 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30216 Message-ID: <20041210173353.476ABE13BCE@sakura.ian-justman.com>
30217
30218 Its not often that i go against everyones wishes, but i agree with this 100%, i generally use /cs op and /cs deop so that users DONT know whos issuing the commands, the ops should know, yes.. but imo, not the users. saying 'Switch off opnotice' doesnt solve the problem. I dont want to revert to /os mode every time i wanna op someone without everyone knowing, or switching on and off opnotice so i can.
30219
30220 /****************************************
30221 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
30222 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
30223 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
30224 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
30225 ****************************************/
30226
30227
30228 /****************************************
30229 * From - Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
30230 * To - IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30231 * Sent - 12:28:38 @ 2004-12-10
30232 * Subject - Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30233 ****************************************/
30234
30235 /****** - Begin Original Message - ******/
30236
30237 >Yes..
30238 >And when i have a headache i should cut my head. Right?
30239 >
30240 >----- Original Message -----
30241 >From: "Anton Wolkov" <phan70m@gmail.com>
30242 >To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30243 >Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:20 PM
30244 >Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30245 >
30246 >
30247 >> Then simply disable opnotice or the OP/DEOP commands altogether.
30248 >>
30249 >>
30250 >> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:18:21 +0200, Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
30251 >> wrote:
30252 >>> Yes but it's wrong.
30253 >>> On large channels is really a problem:(
30254 >>>
30255 >>>
30256 >>>
30257 >>> ----- Original Message -----
30258 >>> From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
30259 >>> To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30260 >>> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:16 PM
30261 >>> Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30262 >>>
30263 >>> > >When OpNotice feature is enabled, ChanServ sends channel notices to
30264 >>> > >all
30265 >>> >>users and not only to channel operators.
30266 >>> >
30267 >>> > This is by design.
30268 >>> >
30269 >>> > --Andrew Church
30270 >>> > achurch@achurch.org
30271 >>> > http://achurch.org/
30272 >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
30273 >>> > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30274 >>> > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30275 >>> >
30276 >>>
30277 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
30278 >>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30279 >>> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30280 >>>
30281 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
30282 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30283 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30284 >>
30285 >
30286 >
30287 >------------------------------------------------------------------
30288 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30289 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30290
30291 /******* - End Original Message - *******/
30292
30293 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Dec 11 02:45:18 2004
30294 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
30295 Date: Fri Dec 10 09:51:58 2004
30296 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30297 In-Reply-To: <20041210173353.476ABE13BCE@sakura.ian-justman.com>
30298 Message-ID: <41b9e236.30040@achurch.org>
30299
30300 >Its not often that i go against everyones wishes, but i agree with this 100%, i generally use /cs op and /cs deop so that users DONT know whos issuing the commands, the ops should know, yes.. but imo, not the users. saying 'Switch off opnotice' doesnt solve the problem. I dont want to revert to /os mode every time i wanna op someone without everyone knowing, or switching on and off opnotice so i can.
30301
30302 And I don't think you should be allowed to do that. "Hiding" the
30303 sending user was never an intention of /cs op, but the result of how the
30304 IRC protocol is designed (you can't send ":user1 MODE #channel +o user2"
30305 for a user on another server). OPNOTICE was intended to restore the
30306 original behavior of everyone being able to see who made the change; it's
30307 optional instead of standard because it results in two lines per mode
30308 change, which can be excessive depending on the channel.
30309
30310 If it really bothers you that normal users can see who +o'd who else,
30311 then turn OPNOTICE off and hack your IRC server so that it substitutes (for
30312 example) the server name in place of the real mode sender when telling
30313 non-ops about +o's.
30314
30315 --Andrew Church
30316 achurch@achurch.org
30317 http://achurch.org/
30318 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Sat Dec 11 01:50:29 2004
30319 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
30320 Date: Sat Dec 11 01:50:44 2004
30321 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30322 References: <41b9e236.30040@achurch.org>
30323 Message-ID: <000501c4df66$dc45b2b0$754405d5@server>
30324
30325 Andrew Hi.
30326
30327 Non-opers doesn't need to know of chanserv op/deop changes.
30328 And yes, i want to (de)(half)op someone on a 1000 users channel and i want
30329 only opers to see the change and not 1000 users.
30330 This bothers even the users. They don't want to see services notices. The
30331 doesn't need to see these type of notices.
30332 This is only cause flood to users.
30333 And is not abusive or something. Opers can see who was executed the Op/Deop
30334 command.
30335 I want to know who is using these commands but i can't enable opnotice
30336 because of this strange behavior.
30337 And i'm sure 100% that i'm not the only one with this problem..
30338 Opnotice is a command (way) to inform opers.. not users.
30339 If someone with access to OP/DEOP is "playing" with it this is a problem
30340 with this oper and the founder.
30341
30342
30343 ----- Original Message -----
30344 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
30345 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
30346 Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 7:45 PM
30347 Subject: Re: Re: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30348
30349
30350 > >Its not often that i go against everyones wishes, but i agree with this
30351 > >100%, i generally use /cs op and /cs deop so that users DONT know whos
30352 > >issuing the commands, the ops should know, yes.. but imo, not the users.
30353 > >saying 'Switch off opnotice' doesnt solve the problem. I dont want to
30354 > >revert to /os mode every time i wanna op someone without everyone
30355 > >knowing, or switching on and off opnotice so i can.
30356 >
30357 > And I don't think you should be allowed to do that. "Hiding" the
30358 > sending user was never an intention of /cs op, but the result of how the
30359 > IRC protocol is designed (you can't send ":user1 MODE #channel +o user2"
30360 > for a user on another server). OPNOTICE was intended to restore the
30361 > original behavior of everyone being able to see who made the change; it's
30362 > optional instead of standard because it results in two lines per mode
30363 > change, which can be excessive depending on the channel.
30364 >
30365 > If it really bothers you that normal users can see who +o'd who else,
30366 > then turn OPNOTICE off and hack your IRC server so that it substitutes
30367 > (for
30368 > example) the server name in place of the real mode sender when telling
30369 > non-ops about +o's.
30370 >
30371 > --Andrew Church
30372 > achurch@achurch.org
30373 > http://achurch.org/
30374 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
30375 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30376 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30377 >
30378
30379
30380 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Dec 11 19:31:18 2004
30381 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
30382 Date: Sat Dec 11 02:32:14 2004
30383 Subject: [IRCServices] Opnotice.
30384 In-Reply-To: <000501c4df66$dc45b2b0$754405d5@server>
30385 Message-ID: <41bacca7.30433@achurch.org>
30386
30387 >Non-opers doesn't need to know of chanserv op/deop changes.
30388 >And yes, i want to (de)(half)op someone on a 1000 users channel and i want
30389 >only opers to see the change and not 1000 users.
30390
30391 Then the answer is "Services doesn't allow you to do that". And
30392 before you ask why, the answer is "because I said so".
30393
30394 End of discussion.
30395
30396 --Andrew Church
30397 achurch@achurch.org
30398 http://achurch.org/
30399 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Sat Dec 11 06:01:15 2004
30400 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
30401 Date: Sat Dec 11 06:01:26 2004
30402 Subject: [IRCServices] Wrong help text for logon-opernews
30403 Message-ID: <000301c4df89$e435c820$754405d5@server>
30404
30405 on the operserv/news.c says:
30406
30407 Anyone can use *NEWS LIST, but *NEWS {ADD,DEL} are reserved for * Services
30408 operators.
30409
30410
30411 On /msg operserv *News help says:
30412
30413 ADD and DEL may only be used by Services administrators.
30414
30415 This help msg is wrong. Services operators can add *news.
30416
30417
30418 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Dec 11 23:12:07 2004
30419 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
30420 Date: Sat Dec 11 06:12:35 2004
30421 Subject: [IRCServices] Wrong help text for logon-opernews
30422 In-Reply-To: <000301c4df89$e435c820$754405d5@server>
30423 Message-ID: <41bb004e.30652@achurch.org>
30424
30425 Fixed, thanks for the report.
30426
30427 --Andrew Church
30428 achurch@achurch.org
30429 http://achurch.org/
30430
30431 >on the operserv/news.c says:
30432 >
30433 >Anyone can use *NEWS LIST, but *NEWS {ADD,DEL} are reserved for * Services
30434 >operators.
30435 >
30436 >
30437 >On /msg operserv *News help says:
30438 >
30439 >ADD and DEL may only be used by Services administrators.
30440 >
30441 >This help msg is wrong. Services operators can add *news.
30442 >
30443 >
30444 >------------------------------------------------------------------
30445 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
30446 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
30447 From monty at disowned.org Sat Dec 11 22:07:55 2004
30448 From: monty at disowned.org (Monty Young)
30449 Date: Sat Dec 11 22:07:22 2004
30450 Subject: [IRCServices] Subscribe/Unsubscribe links
30451 Message-ID: <41BBE03B.5060009@disowned.org>
30452
30453 The switchover to the new domain has left
30454 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices invalid.
30455 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Dec 13 11:54:08 2004
30456 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
30457 Date: Sun Dec 12 18:54:55 2004
30458 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.44 released
30459 Message-ID: <41bd0464.73012@achurch.org>
30460
30461 Services 5.0.44 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
30462
30463 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
30464 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
30465
30466 59191b8b3dc4eabe04c2dd0b5677fcab ircservices-5.0.44.tar.gz
30467 c9ab54e01d72f7664e7c1c8bdb64e1da ircservices-5.0.44.diff.gz
30468 1d3be698031de7b0968090fff835d2f4 ircservices-5.0.44-1.i386.rpm
30469 40c7fc661c6785619e6200d5baab35a9 ircservices_5.0.44-1_i386.deb
30470
30471 The mirrors should have it shortly.
30472
30473 This release is to fix a careless error in the va_copy workaround
30474 introduced in 5.0.43 (like they say on Slashdot, always use the Preview
30475 button...), and to correct the mistake in the news help messages recently
30476 reported. There are no functional changes; upgrade or not at your leisure.
30477
30478 Changes in version 5.0.44
30479 -------------------------
30480 2004/12/13 Fixed a careless error in the va_copy workaround.
30481
30482 --Andrew Church
30483 achurch@achurch.org
30484 http://achurch.org/
30485 From ianj at esper.net Fri Dec 31 21:56:12 2004
30486 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
30487 Date: Fri Dec 31 21:56:24 2004
30488 Subject: [IRCServices] Subscribe/Unsubscribe links
30489 In-Reply-To: <41BBE03B.5060009@disowned.org>
30490 References: <41BBE03B.5060009@disowned.org>
30491 Message-ID: <41D63B7C.6010601@esper.net>
30492
30493 Monty Young wrote:
30494 > The switchover to the new domain has left
30495 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices invalid.
30496
30497 A bit belated, but the links appear to work. I made sure that both
30498 domains worked before pressing this into production.
30499
30500 The list configuration may have needed authorization to change the
30501 links, However, the old address in the .za.net domain now appears to be
30502 working again.
30503
30504 If anyone sees any oddness with the Services list, please contact me
30505 off-list so I can fix it.
30506
30507 Thanks!
30508
30509 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
30510
30511 -----
30512 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
30513 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
30514 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
30515
30516 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.