1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] A discussion on the contents of the todo file
6 <LINK REL=
"Index" HREF=
"index.html" >
7 <LINK REL=
"made" HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20A%20discussion%20on%20the%20contents%20of%20the%20todo%20file&In-Reply-To=">
8 <META NAME=
"robots" CONTENT=
"index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv=
"Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL=
"Previous" HREF=
"001637.html">
11 <LINK REL=
"Next" HREF=
"001628.html">
13 <BODY BGCOLOR=
"#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] A discussion on the contents of the todo file
</H1>
16 <A HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20A%20discussion%20on%20the%20contents%20of%20the%20todo%20file&In-Reply-To="
17 TITLE=
"[IRCServices] A discussion on the contents of the todo file">bclark at bclark.yi.org
19 <I>Sun Mar
18 18:
00:
13 PST
2001</I>
21 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"001637.html">[IRCServices] A discussion on the contents of the todo file
23 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"001628.html">[IRCServices] A discussion on the contents of the todo file
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
26 <a href=
"date.html#1627">[ date ]
</a>
27 <a href=
"thread.html#1627">[ thread ]
</a>
28 <a href=
"subject.html#1627">[ subject ]
</a>
29 <a href=
"author.html#1627">[ author ]
</a>
34 <PRE>On Sun,
18 Mar
2001 20:
00:
00 +
0500, Imran Ali Rashid said:
36 ><i> Warning: this is a LONG email.
38 Reply won't be quite as long -- don't worry. ;)
40 ><i> > ** Warn about being kicked off after N password failures
42 </I>><i> Has there been a discussion on this?
45 I'm not sure if there was, but I don't see the point of a warning -- if
46 all you're going to do is kill them, no user intent on cracking a
47 password is going to care all that much.
49 ><i> > OS REHASH command
51 I thought rehash was already added .........
53 ><i> > CS SET REVENGE (reverses ban, etc. set by lower level user on
55 </I>><i> and optionally deops/kicks/bans lower level user)
57 Couldn't really see the point of this, either -- there was a long
58 discussion about it about a month ago.
60 ><i> > CS Last used time for access, AKICK entries
62 </I>><i> This is a good idea. This was even mentioned by someone recently.
63 </I>><i> So lets discuss it and see how many people like it.
66 As an extension to that, I was considering making those entries expire
67 after a certain amount of time. I got it to work well enough on mine for
68 akicks, but I just decided to scrap it for access-list entries -- I
69 figure that access lists are normally far longer than akick lists, so
70 it'd just slow things down too much on any medium-sized network.
72 As far as just showing the last-used time, though, I don't see any
75 ><i> > NS SET ALL (especially PASSWORD) for all linked nicks
78 I don't like the SET ALL idea either, mainly for the reasons you gave.
79 Something similar to Dal's
"/chanserv why
" command, on the other hand,
80 probably wouldn't be too hard (just an extension of the current
81 "/chanserv listchans
" that was being talked about a couple of days ago,
84 ><i> > MS MemoServ IGNORE {ADD,DEL,LIST}
86 </I>><i> to help against this and cases of memo flooding, a
87 </I>><i> command may be put in to get rid of the memos of a
88 </I>><i> certain nick.
90 Or by being able to ignore a hostmask, maybe ....... it'd make things
91 more difficult for the flooder, at least.
93 ><i> > ** Add a way to send OperServ (and other?) commands from the shell
95 </I>><i> This is defintely a big help. but how about just having a telnet
96 </I>><i> session with services, since that would facilitate an
97 </I>><i> easier access to commands, and is a seemingly good idea... I'm waiting
98 </I>><i> for people to shoot holes through this, since I
99 </I>><i> haven't really thought on it a lot.
102 Telnetting to services ......... it'd be complicated at best, the way I'm
103 imagining it. I know it seems like Services is a server when it connects
104 to a network, but at its heart, it's really a client, since it's not set
105 up to actually accept connections -- it only initiates them. Perhaps
106 it'll be easier to do with the modularization in Services
5.0, but right
107 now, adding the server capabilities to Services looks like it would
108 require a bit more than a couple of new functions.
119 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"001637.html">[IRCServices] A discussion on the contents of the todo file
121 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"001628.html">[IRCServices] A discussion on the contents of the todo file
123 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
124 <a href=
"date.html#1627">[ date ]
</a>
125 <a href=
"thread.html#1627">[ thread ]
</a>
126 <a href=
"subject.html#1627">[ subject ]
</a>
127 <a href=
"author.html#1627">[ author ]
</a>