1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] ACCESS and *OP
6 <LINK REL=
"Index" HREF=
"index.html" >
7 <LINK REL=
"made" HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ACCESS%20and%20%2AOP&In-Reply-To=">
8 <META NAME=
"robots" CONTENT=
"index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv=
"Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL=
"Previous" HREF=
"000535.html">
11 <LINK REL=
"Next" HREF=
"000538.html">
13 <BODY BGCOLOR=
"#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] ACCESS and *OP
</H1>
15 <B>Kelmar K. Firesun
</B>
16 <A HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ACCESS%20and%20%2AOP&In-Reply-To="
17 TITLE=
"[IRCServices] ACCESS and *OP">kfiresun at ix.netcom.com
19 <I>Sat May
13 12:
58:
24 PDT
2000</I>
21 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"000535.html">[IRCServices] ACCESS and *OP
23 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"000538.html">[IRCServices]
4.4.x ETA
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
26 <a href=
"date.html#537">[ date ]
</a>
27 <a href=
"thread.html#537">[ thread ]
</a>
28 <a href=
"subject.html#537">[ subject ]
</a>
29 <a href=
"author.html#537">[ author ]
</a>
39 </I>><i> As for the addition of AOP/SOP/etc commands, I am not overly against
40 </I>><i>them except inasmuch as they represent a
"standard
" that doesn't have to
41 </I>><i>be a standard; I also remember quite well the numerous complaints that
42 </I>><i>people found the level system difficult to use. On the other hand, I have
43 </I>><i>come to detest the attitude of Microsoft (among others) to do their best
44 </I>><i>to keep you ignorant even if you know what you're doing, and taking out
45 </I>><i>the ACCESS command would be too close to that for my liking. What I would
46 </I>><i>recommend is to add the *OP functions, either as commands or as
47 </I>><i>alternatives for the ACCESS ADD level value, and have those functions in
48 </I>><i>turn call ACCESS ADD with an appropriate level. Naturally, this would not
49 </I>><i>work if the channel levels had been changed, but by adding an EXPERT
50 </I>><i>channel option as someone else suggested and disallowing level changes
51 </I>><i>without EXPERT set, AOP/SOP/etc become workable again under the ACCESS
55 I don't see why an AOP/SOP/etc. command couldn't look at the level settings
56 themselves and use those numbers.... I.E. if a founder of a channel sets
57 the Auto Oping level to
4, why can't the AOP ADD
<NICK
> command just add
62 </I>><i> My personal preference is to use *OP as an option to the ACCESS ADD
63 </I>><i>command, and display levels by name in LIST if EXPERT is not set. The
64 </I>><i>user/Services dialogue would look something like this:
69 This sounds like something that would probably be best suited to an
70 individual setting rather than a channel setting. Perhaps it would
71 also be wise to display both level
"types
" for those with the EXPERT
74 -
> *ChanServ* access #channel list
75 -ChanServ- Num Level OP-Type Nick
76 -ChanServ-
1 10 AOP MyNick
77 -ChanServ-
2 5 SOP SomeNick
79 Also, (on a side note) those with expert mode not set might be
80 limited from setting/using the more
"dangerous
" commands like:
81 -
> *NickServ* SET KILL IMMED
89 ---------------------------------------------------------------
90 To unsubscribe, send email to
<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">majordomo at ender.shadowfire.org
</A>
91 with
"unsubscribe ircservices
" in the body, without the quotes.
100 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"000535.html">[IRCServices] ACCESS and *OP
102 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"000538.html">[IRCServices]
4.4.x ETA
104 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
105 <a href=
"date.html#537">[ date ]
</a>
106 <a href=
"thread.html#537">[ thread ]
</a>
107 <a href=
"subject.html#537">[ subject ]
</a>
108 <a href=
"author.html#537">[ author ]
</a>