]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blob - software/RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices/2005.txt
rename -> *.git
[irc.git] / software / RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices / 2005.txt
1 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Wed Jan 5 09:01:16 2005
2 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
3 Date: Wed Jan 5 09:01:43 2005
4 Subject: [IRCServices] LogonNews And Opernews Feature.
5 Message-ID: <003101c4f348$31017330$2c4405d5@server>
6
7 Services sends the first 3 logon/opernews to users to prevent flood
8 This is correct. BUT
9 If i want an to add another opernew or a logonnew to be showen on connect i
10 should delete another.
11
12 A new command should be added.. so none message need to be deleted but just
13 be hidden :-)
14
15 /OS OPERNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
16 /OS LOGONNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
17
18 With this none message is lost (deleted) and if i want to i can enable to be
19 shown and hide another one;-)
20
21
22 From youph at earthlink.net Fri Jan 7 00:43:56 2005
23 From: youph at earthlink.net (youph@earthlink.net)
24 Date: Fri Jan 7 00:44:14 2005
25 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request
26 Message-ID: <41DE4BCC.6030607@earthlink.net>
27
28 Hi. I just subscribed to the list so I'm not sure if this has been asked
29 before (though I doubt it as it's kind of an esoteric request.)
30
31 Anyway, I need a way to register nicknames in NickServ by a third party
32 (this would be done via a bot with Services Admin privledges) with only
33 an MD5 hash of their password. I'm trying to automate a registration
34 process from a message board program and the only way to really keep
35 security tight would be to pass the MD5 hashed password of the user to
36 the IRC nick registering script (which launches a bot to register a nick
37 on IRC.)
38
39 I know I can edit the XML dbs, but I'm under the impression this
40 requires shutting down/restatring services and obviously this isn't an
41 option for a production network.
42
43 Appologies if I'm an idiot and this can be done already, so if it can,
44 please pray tell!
45
46 Otherwise, I think adding a simple parameter to the /nickserv register
47 command specifying the password used is already an MD5 hash would be a
48 great (and seemingly simple) feature.
49
50 Thanks,
51
52 --euph
53 From phan70m at gmail.com Fri Jan 7 01:33:24 2005
54 From: phan70m at gmail.com (Anton Wolkov)
55 Date: Fri Jan 7 01:33:27 2005
56 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request
57 In-Reply-To: <41DE4BCC.6030607@earthlink.net>
58 References: <41DE4BCC.6030607@earthlink.net>
59 Message-ID: <d50f59a005010701335fa0c766@mail.gmail.com>
60
61 you should check the blitzed version of ircservices 4,
62 they use mysql for the database and sha1 for passwords (compatible
63 with mysql's sha1()).
64 http://www.blitzed.org/software.phtml#services
65 and never fear modding yourself.
66
67 --
68 PHANTOm <phantom@nix.co.il> -- www.irc.nix.co.il
69 From youph at earthlink.net Fri Jan 7 01:48:02 2005
70 From: youph at earthlink.net (youph@earthlink.net)
71 Date: Fri Jan 7 01:48:12 2005
72 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature Request
73 In-Reply-To: <d50f59a005010701335fa0c766@mail.gmail.com>
74 References: <41DE4BCC.6030607@earthlink.net>
75 <d50f59a005010701335fa0c766@mail.gmail.com>
76 Message-ID: <41DE5AD2.2010308@earthlink.net>
77
78 Anton Wolkov wrote:
79
80 >you should check the blitzed version of ircservices 4,
81 >they use mysql for the database and sha1 for passwords (compatible
82 >with mysql's sha1()).
83 >http://www.blitzed.org/software.phtml#services
84 >and never fear modding yourself.
85 >
86 >--
87 >PHANTOm <phantom@nix.co.il> -- www.irc.nix.co.il
88 >------------------------------------------------------------------
89 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
90 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
91 >
92 >
93 >
94 Yeah I know I can do it in other services packages but I like the simple
95 setup I have now with IRC services 5 and would like it included in a
96 future release (it shouldn't be that tough and yeah I should just code
97 it myself but I haven't been coding much these days for many reasons.)
98 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Sun Jan 9 01:05:25 2005
99 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
100 Date: Sun Jan 9 01:05:55 2005
101 Subject: [IRCServices] Discrepancy with help for NickServ and ChanServ LIST
102 Message-ID: <web-584841705@mail01.infosat.net>
103
104 I've just noticed that while the help for the NickServ LIST
105 command displays extra information for privileged users
106 (the "for services admins, nonexpiring nicks will be
107 prepended with a !" bit), the ChanServ LIST doesn't do the
108 same thing. In other words, when a privileged user types
109 /msg Chanserv HELP LIST, they should, in addition to what
110 normal users receive, also receive the "For services
111 admins, nonexpiring channels will be prepended with a !
112 ..." text, and such related information. But that just what
113 I think should happen; other users on this list may have
114 their own opinion.
115
116 I took a look in the English language file, and the strings
117 that would be required for this don't seem to exist (unless
118 I missed them somewhere), implying to me that this is
119 something that got overlooked somewhere. (Obviously, this
120 also means that it's platform-independent.)
121
122 It would be nice if this discrepancy between NickServ's and
123 ChanServ's HELP LIST would be fixed in a future version.
124 _____________________________________________________________________
125 For super low premiums, click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
126 From youph at earthlink.net Tue Jan 11 06:21:18 2005
127 From: youph at earthlink.net (youph@earthlink.net)
128 Date: Tue Jan 11 06:21:37 2005
129 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
130 Message-ID: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
131
132 I'm just wondering if there is any 'official' feature request process or
133 if Andrew Church just takes what he likes from this list into account
134 when adding new features. I do appreciate Anton Wolkov's input, but I
135 was hoping for a response from the developer at least either agreeing
136 with or shooting down my idea/request.
137
138 Maybe I should roll up my sleeves and write a patch myself (sigh.)
139
140 --Matt
141 From ianj at esper.net Tue Jan 11 18:07:44 2005
142 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
143 Date: Tue Jan 11 18:07:54 2005
144 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
145 In-Reply-To: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
146 References: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
147 Message-ID: <41E48670.20207@esper.net>
148
149 youph@earthlink.net wrote:
150 > I'm just wondering if there is any 'official' feature request process or
151 > if Andrew Church just takes what he likes from this list into account
152 > when adding new features. I do appreciate Anton Wolkov's input, but I
153 > was hoping for a response from the developer at least either agreeing
154 > with or shooting down my idea/request.
155 >
156 > Maybe I should roll up my sleeves and write a patch myself (sigh.)
157 >
158 > --Matt
159
160 Hello.
161
162 I think requesting it on the list is sufficient. Of course, Andy has
163 the final say.
164
165 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
166
167 -----
168 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
169 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
170 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
171
172 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
173 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Tue Jan 11 20:52:38 2005
174 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
175 Date: Tue Jan 11 20:52:39 2005
176 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
177 In-Reply-To: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
178 References: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
179 Message-ID: <41E4AD16.1090908@frostycoolslug.com>
180
181 heh, i think we are all still recovering from christmas, i've not seen
182 many posts here over that season.
183
184 I personally (and i think andy would have the same responce, i've gotten
185 to know him over the past few years), would shoot down this idea, it has
186 quite a large potential to be abused, if you write a patch, ensure only
187 specific IPs can issue the command, otherwise you will have users just
188 making scripts which periodicly register nicks, and you'll only become
189 suspicious when your nick.db is 3gigs big :p
190
191 My approach would be a seperate module, which deals with the command,
192 whether its an 'extention' to nickserv with a new command, or a
193 completly new service which manages it (The second is the method we used
194 for our web interface), that way, you could also publish your work, and
195 give the others the benifit of your experiance (but ofc, thats up to you).
196
197 As for a feature request 'process', just post ideas to the list, they
198 will be read over, if not responded too.
199
200 /****************************************
201 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
202 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
203 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
204 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
205 ****************************************/
206
207 youph@earthlink.net wrote:
208 > I'm just wondering if there is any 'official' feature request process or
209 > if Andrew Church just takes what he likes from this list into account
210 > when adding new features. I do appreciate Anton Wolkov's input, but I
211 > was hoping for a response from the developer at least either agreeing
212 > with or shooting down my idea/request.
213 >
214 > Maybe I should roll up my sleeves and write a patch myself (sigh.)
215 >
216 > --Matt
217 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
218 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
219 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
220 >
221 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Tue Jan 11 20:56:26 2005
222 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
223 Date: Tue Jan 11 20:56:28 2005
224 Subject: [IRCServices] LogonNews And Opernews Feature.
225 In-Reply-To: <003101c4f348$31017330$2c4405d5@server>
226 References: <003101c4f348$31017330$2c4405d5@server>
227 Message-ID: <41E4ADFA.40004@frostycoolslug.com>
228
229 Welcome to feature week.
230
231 This idea does have some potential, but i really cant see it being used
232 too often (I'm in a negative mood today). Hiding oper news is all well
233 and good if you wish to add another, but then what are the chances of
234 you showing that news again? if you feel its not important enough to be
235 shown, then it will probably never be shown again. And i'm sure (unless
236 you use excessive ammounts of mIRC control codes) it will only take
237 about 10seconds to put old news back if you type it by hand. Seems like
238 a lot of additional code for something that could be done easily.
239
240 /****************************************
241 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
242 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
243 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
244 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
245 ****************************************/
246
247 Dionisios K. wrote:
248 > Services sends the first 3 logon/opernews to users to prevent flood
249 > This is correct. BUT
250 > If i want an to add another opernew or a logonnew to be showen on
251 > connect i should delete another.
252 >
253 > A new command should be added.. so none message need to be deleted but
254 > just be hidden :-)
255 >
256 > /OS OPERNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
257 > /OS LOGONNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
258 >
259 > With this none message is lost (deleted) and if i want to i can enable
260 > to be shown and hide another one;-)
261 >
262 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
263 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
264 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
265 >
266 From youph at earthlink.net Tue Jan 11 22:25:41 2005
267 From: youph at earthlink.net (youph@earthlink.net)
268 Date: Tue Jan 11 22:25:57 2005
269 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
270 In-Reply-To: <41E4AD16.1090908@frostycoolslug.com>
271 References: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
272 <41E4AD16.1090908@frostycoolslug.com>
273 Message-ID: <41E4C2E5.5040101@earthlink.net>
274
275 Craig McLure wrote:
276
277 > heh, i think we are all still recovering from christmas, i've not seen
278 > many posts here over that season.
279 >
280 > I personally (and i think andy would have the same responce, i've
281 > gotten to know him over the past few years), would shoot down this
282 > idea, it has quite a large potential to be abused, if you write a
283 > patch, ensure only specific IPs can issue the command, otherwise you
284 > will have users just making scripts which periodicly register nicks,
285 > and you'll only become suspicious when your nick.db is 3gigs big :p
286 >
287 > My approach would be a seperate module, which deals with the command,
288 > whether its an 'extention' to nickserv with a new command, or a
289 > completly new service which manages it (The second is the method we
290 > used for our web interface), that way, you could also publish your
291 > work, and give the others the benifit of your experiance (but ofc,
292 > thats up to you).
293 >
294 > As for a feature request 'process', just post ideas to the list, they
295 > will be read over, if not responded too.
296 >
297 > /****************************************
298 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
299 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
300 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
301 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
302 > ****************************************/
303 >
304 > youph@earthlink.net wrote:
305 >
306 >> I'm just wondering if there is any 'official' feature request process
307 >> or if Andrew Church just takes what he likes from this list into
308 >> account when adding new features. I do appreciate Anton Wolkov's
309 >> input, but I was hoping for a response from the developer at least
310 >> either agreeing with or shooting down my idea/request.
311 >>
312 >> Maybe I should roll up my sleeves and write a patch myself (sigh.)
313 >>
314 >> --Matt
315 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
316 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
317 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
318 >>
319 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
320 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
321 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
322 >
323 Craig,
324
325 I think you have the wrong idea concerning how I would implement the
326 feature I requested. Let me rephrase my idea/request.
327
328 I would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to set a user
329 password using an MD5 hash, when using MD5 encrypted passwords with
330 services. Normally, a user registers a nick and provides a plaintext
331 password. This plaintext pass is then hashed and stored in the db (if
332 encryption is enabled which I am saying is true in this instance.) I
333 would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to *directly* set
334 this parameter in a nick record. I.E. I would like to be able to change
335 the *hashed* passwords of users. The only command for dealing with MD5
336 passwords is resetting. It would seem trivial to add the ability to
337 simply overwrite the MD5 hash parameter in the nick record. The reason
338 being I am trying to automate a registration process that starts with a
339 web forum registration and will (hopefully) also register a nick name on
340 IRC for the user. I would only have the MD5 hash of the user's password
341 though, which leads me to this request.
342
343 I don't see *any* abuse potential as this command extension would be
344 restricted to Service Admins, I think you just were confused by my
345 description.
346
347 --Matt
348
349 From chris at starglade.org Wed Jan 12 03:31:54 2005
350 From: chris at starglade.org (Chris Jenkinson)
351 Date: Wed Jan 12 03:32:07 2005
352 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
353 In-Reply-To: <41E4C2E5.5040101@earthlink.net>
354 References: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
355 <41E4AD16.1090908@frostycoolslug.com>
356 <41E4C2E5.5040101@earthlink.net>
357 Message-ID: <43226.62.231.155.3.1105529514.squirrel@62.231.155.3>
358
359
360 On Wed, January 12, 2005 6:25 am, youph@earthlink.net said:
361 > I would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to set a user
362 > password using an MD5 hash, when using MD5 encrypted passwords with
363 > services. Normally, a user registers a nick and provides a plaintext
364 > password. This plaintext pass is then hashed and stored in the db (if
365 > encryption is enabled which I am saying is true in this instance.) I
366 > would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to *directly* set
367 > this parameter in a nick record. I.E. I would like to be able to change
368 > the *hashed* passwords of users. The only command for dealing with MD5
369 > passwords is resetting. It would seem trivial to add the ability to
370 > simply overwrite the MD5 hash parameter in the nick record. The reason
371 > being I am trying to automate a registration process that starts with a
372 > web forum registration and will (hopefully) also register a nick name on
373 > IRC for the user. I would only have the MD5 hash of the user's password
374 > though, which leads me to this request.
375
376 Kind of off-topic here and out of curiousity, how do you aim to handle a
377 situation where someone registers an account on your website which isn't
378 usable as an IRC nick (for example "Hello Bob")? I've been considering a
379 problem like this for some time and I'd like to see how someone else is
380 aiming to do it.
381
382 Chris
383
384 --
385 Chris Jenkinson
386 chris@starglade.org
387
388 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Jan 12 11:10:21 2005
389 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
390 Date: Wed Jan 12 11:10:22 2005
391 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
392 In-Reply-To: <41E4C2E5.5040101@earthlink.net>
393 References: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net> <41E4AD16.1090908@frostycoolslug.com>
394 <41E4C2E5.5040101@earthlink.net>
395 Message-ID: <41E5761D.4090403@frostycoolslug.com>
396
397 aah, my mistake, i dont see any problem with this then :)
398
399 /****************************************
400 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
401 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
402 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
403 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
404 ****************************************/
405
406 youph@earthlink.net wrote:
407 > Craig McLure wrote:
408 >
409 >> heh, i think we are all still recovering from christmas, i've not seen
410 >> many posts here over that season.
411 >>
412 >> I personally (and i think andy would have the same responce, i've
413 >> gotten to know him over the past few years), would shoot down this
414 >> idea, it has quite a large potential to be abused, if you write a
415 >> patch, ensure only specific IPs can issue the command, otherwise you
416 >> will have users just making scripts which periodicly register nicks,
417 >> and you'll only become suspicious when your nick.db is 3gigs big :p
418 >>
419 >> My approach would be a seperate module, which deals with the command,
420 >> whether its an 'extention' to nickserv with a new command, or a
421 >> completly new service which manages it (The second is the method we
422 >> used for our web interface), that way, you could also publish your
423 >> work, and give the others the benifit of your experiance (but ofc,
424 >> thats up to you).
425 >>
426 >> As for a feature request 'process', just post ideas to the list, they
427 >> will be read over, if not responded too.
428 >>
429 >> /****************************************
430 >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
431 >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
432 >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
433 >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
434 >> ****************************************/
435 >>
436 >> youph@earthlink.net wrote:
437 >>
438 >>> I'm just wondering if there is any 'official' feature request process
439 >>> or if Andrew Church just takes what he likes from this list into
440 >>> account when adding new features. I do appreciate Anton Wolkov's
441 >>> input, but I was hoping for a response from the developer at least
442 >>> either agreeing with or shooting down my idea/request.
443 >>>
444 >>> Maybe I should roll up my sleeves and write a patch myself (sigh.)
445 >>>
446 >>> --Matt
447 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
448 >>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
449 >>> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
450 >>>
451 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
452 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
453 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
454 >>
455 > Craig,
456 >
457 > I think you have the wrong idea concerning how I would implement the
458 > feature I requested. Let me rephrase my idea/request.
459 >
460 > I would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to set a user
461 > password using an MD5 hash, when using MD5 encrypted passwords with
462 > services. Normally, a user registers a nick and provides a plaintext
463 > password. This plaintext pass is then hashed and stored in the db (if
464 > encryption is enabled which I am saying is true in this instance.) I
465 > would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to *directly* set
466 > this parameter in a nick record. I.E. I would like to be able to change
467 > the *hashed* passwords of users. The only command for dealing with MD5
468 > passwords is resetting. It would seem trivial to add the ability to
469 > simply overwrite the MD5 hash parameter in the nick record. The reason
470 > being I am trying to automate a registration process that starts with a
471 > web forum registration and will (hopefully) also register a nick name on
472 > IRC for the user. I would only have the MD5 hash of the user's password
473 > though, which leads me to this request.
474 >
475 > I don't see *any* abuse potential as this command extension would be
476 > restricted to Service Admins, I think you just were confused by my
477 > description.
478 >
479 > --Matt
480 >
481 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
482 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
483 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
484 >
485 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jan 13 06:17:06 2005
486 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
487 Date: Wed Jan 12 13:18:25 2005
488 Subject: [IRCServices] LogonNews And Opernews Feature.
489 In-Reply-To: <003101c4f348$31017330$2c4405d5@server>
490 Message-ID: <41e59413.00574@achurch.org>
491
492 As Craig suggests, this is unnecessary--if you have a real need to
493 hide a news item temporarily, save it in a text file somewhere and re-add
494 it manually when needed.
495
496 --Andrew Church
497 achurch@achurch.org
498 http://achurch.org/
499
500 >Services sends the first 3 logon/opernews to users to prevent flood
501 >This is correct. BUT
502 >If i want an to add another opernew or a logonnew to be showen on connect i
503 >should delete another.
504 >
505 >A new command should be added.. so none message need to be deleted but just
506 >be hidden :-)
507 >
508 >/OS OPERNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
509 >/OS LOGONNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
510 >
511 >With this none message is lost (deleted) and if i want to i can enable to be
512 >shown and hide another one;-)
513 >
514 >
515 >------------------------------------------------------------------
516 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
517 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
518 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed Jan 12 13:25:25 2005
519 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
520 Date: Wed Jan 12 13:25:42 2005
521 Subject: [IRCServices] LogonNews And Opernews Feature.
522 In-Reply-To: <41e59413.00574@achurch.org>
523 References: <41e59413.00574@achurch.org>
524 Message-ID: <41E595C5.3020804@winbot.co.uk>
525
526 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
527 Hash: SHA1
528
529 is there any way to make services display more than 3 news items though?
530 lets say you had 5 valid news items? (recompiling and modifying source
531 not counting as an (obvious) answer) :)
532
533 Thanks,
534 Brain
535
536 Andrew Church wrote:
537 | As Craig suggests, this is unnecessary--if you have a real need to
538 | hide a news item temporarily, save it in a text file somewhere and re-add
539 | it manually when needed.
540 |
541 | --Andrew Church
542 | achurch@achurch.org
543 | http://achurch.org/
544 |
545 |
546 |>Services sends the first 3 logon/opernews to users to prevent flood
547 |>This is correct. BUT
548 |>If i want an to add another opernew or a logonnew to be showen on
549 connect i
550 |>should delete another.
551 |>
552 |>A new command should be added.. so none message need to be deleted but
553 just
554 |>be hidden :-)
555 |>
556 |>/OS OPERNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
557 |>/OS LOGONNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
558 |>
559 |>With this none message is lost (deleted) and if i want to i can enable
560 to be
561 |>shown and hide another one;-)
562 |>
563 |>
564 |>------------------------------------------------------------------
565 |>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
566 |>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
567 |
568 | ------------------------------------------------------------------
569 | To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
570 | http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
571 |
572 |
573
574 - --
575 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
576 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
577 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
578 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
579 - --
580 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
581 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
582 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
583
584 iD8DBQFB5ZXF0k42Wxli/BARArjUAJ46av8ubO+YRbHM/isiNQTOA6WCUACfWbPC
585 WFJm4k26xJLuiWzBsnxd+7U=
586 =mri5
587 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
588 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jan 13 06:31:01 2005
589 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
590 Date: Wed Jan 12 13:38:57 2005
591 Subject: [IRCServices] Discrepancy with help for NickServ and ChanServ LIST
592 In-Reply-To: <web-584841705@mail01.infosat.net>
593 Message-ID: <41e598d1.03253@achurch.org>
594
595 Fixed, thanks for the report.
596
597 --Andrew Church
598 achurch@achurch.org
599 http://achurch.org/
600
601 >I've just noticed that while the help for the NickServ LIST
602 >command displays extra information for privileged users
603 >(the "for services admins, nonexpiring nicks will be
604 >prepended with a !" bit), the ChanServ LIST doesn't do the
605 >same thing. In other words, when a privileged user types
606 >/msg Chanserv HELP LIST, they should, in addition to what
607 >normal users receive, also receive the "For services
608 >admins, nonexpiring channels will be prepended with a !
609 >..." text, and such related information. But that just what
610 >I think should happen; other users on this list may have
611 >their own opinion.
612 >
613 >I took a look in the English language file, and the strings
614 >that would be required for this don't seem to exist (unless
615 >I missed them somewhere), implying to me that this is
616 >something that got overlooked somewhere. (Obviously, this
617 >also means that it's platform-independent.)
618 >
619 >It would be nice if this discrepancy between NickServ's and
620 >ChanServ's HELP LIST would be fixed in a future version.
621 >_____________________________________________________________________
622 >For super low premiums, click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote
623 >------------------------------------------------------------------
624 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
625 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
626 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jan 13 06:18:31 2005
627 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
628 Date: Wed Jan 12 13:45:43 2005
629 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
630 In-Reply-To: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net>
631 Message-ID: <41e59a80.04164@achurch.org>
632
633 Posting on the list is actually the preferred method of requesting
634 features; however, I don't always respond immediately--sometimes (as here)
635 I like to wait and see what other reaction there is from the community.
636 (On the other hand, I shoot down things I don't like or things in the FAQ
637 immediately--so not seeing any response from me may be a good sign. ;) )
638
639 As far as the feature itself goes, I'm ambivalent at the moment; I
640 certainly understand the need for security, but on the whole Services isn't
641 designed to be controllable from outside IRC, and I'm hesitant about adding
642 in a hack for that purpose without giving it some good design thought.
643 What you might want to try doing is writing a module, say nickserv/regcrypt,
644 that borrows from do_register() in nickserv/main.c; that's more portable
645 than patching the distributed code directly.
646
647 --Andrew Church
648 achurch@achurch.org
649 http://achurch.org/
650
651 >I'm just wondering if there is any 'official' feature request process or
652 >if Andrew Church just takes what he likes from this list into account
653 >when adding new features. I do appreciate Anton Wolkov's input, but I
654 >was hoping for a response from the developer at least either agreeing
655 >with or shooting down my idea/request.
656 >
657 >Maybe I should roll up my sleeves and write a patch myself (sigh.)
658 >
659 >--Matt
660 >------------------------------------------------------------------
661 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
662 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
663
664 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jan 13 06:46:05 2005
665 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
666 Date: Wed Jan 12 13:47:52 2005
667 Subject: [IRCServices] LogonNews And Opernews Feature.
668 In-Reply-To: <41E595C5.3020804@winbot.co.uk>
669 Message-ID: <41e59b04.04202@achurch.org>
670
671 No, there isn't. I may think about it in the future if there's
672 enough call for it, but I really think three notices at logon is plenty;
673 if you need more, use the MOTD or something.
674
675 --Andrew Church
676 achurch@achurch.org
677 http://achurch.org/
678
679 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
680 >Hash: SHA1
681 >
682 >is there any way to make services display more than 3 news items though?
683 >lets say you had 5 valid news items? (recompiling and modifying source
684 >not counting as an (obvious) answer) :)
685 >
686 >Thanks,
687 >Brain
688 >
689 >Andrew Church wrote:
690 >| As Craig suggests, this is unnecessary--if you have a real need to
691 >| hide a news item temporarily, save it in a text file somewhere and re-add
692 >| it manually when needed.
693 >|
694 >| --Andrew Church
695 >| achurch@achurch.org
696 >| http://achurch.org/
697 >|
698 >|
699 >|>Services sends the first 3 logon/opernews to users to prevent flood
700 >|>This is correct. BUT
701 >|>If i want an to add another opernew or a logonnew to be showen on
702 >connect i
703 >|>should delete another.
704 >|>
705 >|>A new command should be added.. so none message need to be deleted but
706 >just
707 >|>be hidden :-)
708 >|>
709 >|>/OS OPERNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
710 >|>/OS LOGONNEWS HIDE / SHOW #num
711 >|>
712 >|>With this none message is lost (deleted) and if i want to i can enable
713 >to be
714 >|>shown and hide another one;-)
715 >|>
716 >|>
717 >|>------------------------------------------------------------------
718 >|>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
719 >|>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
720 >|
721 >| ------------------------------------------------------------------
722 >| To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
723 >| http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
724 >|
725 >|
726 >
727 >- --
728 >WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
729 >ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
730 >InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
731 >Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
732 >- --
733 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
734 >Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
735 >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
736 >
737 >iD8DBQFB5ZXF0k42Wxli/BARArjUAJ46av8ubO+YRbHM/isiNQTOA6WCUACfWbPC
738 >WFJm4k26xJLuiWzBsnxd+7U=
739 >=mri5
740 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
741 >------------------------------------------------------------------
742 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
743 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
744 From youph at earthlink.net Thu Jan 13 00:18:50 2005
745 From: youph at earthlink.net (youph@earthlink.net)
746 Date: Thu Jan 13 00:19:02 2005
747 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: Andrew, Re: Chris... Re: Feature Request
748 Message-ID: <41E62EEA.7090205@earthlink.net>
749
750 Andrew,
751
752 I of course respect your ambivalence but I don?t quite understand it.
753
754 The reason I am requesting this feature is because I feel services is
755 incomplete as is. The root user of services should, in theory (or at
756 least in my perception of what a root user means) be able to read/write
757 all db values inside the services database. This would include reading
758 and writing hashed passwords (which, obviously, poses no security threat
759 what so ever.)
760
761 I would like to further this (friendly) discussion with anyone apposed
762 to my views.
763
764 Of course I can write my own module, but I?d rather see it implemented
765 ?officially? as I see it as a missing part of the IRC services package,
766 which, brown nosing aside, is a masterpirce Andrew, cheers to you!
767
768 Chris,
769 RE:
770 ?Kind of off-topic here and out of curiousity, how do you aim to handle a
771 situation where someone registers an account on your website which isn't
772 usable as an IRC nick (for example "Hello Bob")? I've been considering a
773 problem like this for some time and I'd like to see how someone else is
774 aiming to do it.?
775
776 Well it hasn?t been implemented yet (obviously) but this is the general
777 theory:
778
779 Pass User Name and Password values from the web forum used for
780 registration as parameters to an external CGI script/program that would
781 either:
782 a) connect to IRC
783 b) always be connected to IRC and merely take the parameters in some
784 type of Inter Process Communication method such as a socket or via
785 signals/files or memory mapping? it wouldn?t matter really
786
787 First off, the bot would have services admin privileges.
788
789 The bot would first check to make sure the User Name was valid for IRC
790 and make changes as necessary (this would be non-trivial I assume) and
791 then /nick to the User Name. Next the bot would /ns register <dummy
792 password> and immediately /ns set MD5password <Password> with the known
793 MD5 hash of the user?s forum account.
794
795 Its only possible if, of course, the ability to set a password with the
796 MD5 hash was implemented.
797
798 --Matt
799
800 From youph at earthlink.net Thu Jan 13 01:08:55 2005
801 From: youph at earthlink.net (youph@earthlink.net)
802 Date: Thu Jan 13 01:09:05 2005
803 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
804 In-Reply-To: <43226.62.231.155.3.1105529514.squirrel@62.231.155.3>
805 References: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net> <41E4AD16.1090908@frostycoolslug.com> <41E4C2E5.5040101@earthlink.net>
806 <43226.62.231.155.3.1105529514.squirrel@62.231.155.3>
807 Message-ID: <41E63AA7.3090000@earthlink.net>
808
809 Chris Jenkinson wrote:
810
811 >On Wed, January 12, 2005 6:25 am, youph@earthlink.net said:
812 >
813 >
814 >>I would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to set a user
815 >>password using an MD5 hash, when using MD5 encrypted passwords with
816 >>services. Normally, a user registers a nick and provides a plaintext
817 >>password. This plaintext pass is then hashed and stored in the db (if
818 >>encryption is enabled which I am saying is true in this instance.) I
819 >>would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to *directly* set
820 >>this parameter in a nick record. I.E. I would like to be able to change
821 >>the *hashed* passwords of users. The only command for dealing with MD5
822 >>passwords is resetting. It would seem trivial to add the ability to
823 >>simply overwrite the MD5 hash parameter in the nick record. The reason
824 >>being I am trying to automate a registration process that starts with a
825 >>web forum registration and will (hopefully) also register a nick name on
826 >>IRC for the user. I would only have the MD5 hash of the user's password
827 >>though, which leads me to this request.
828 >>
829 >>
830 >
831 >Kind of off-topic here and out of curiousity, how do you aim to handle a
832 >situation where someone registers an account on your website which isn't
833 >usable as an IRC nick (for example "Hello Bob")? I've been considering a
834 >problem like this for some time and I'd like to see how someone else is
835 >aiming to do it.
836 >
837 >Chris
838 >
839 >
840 >
841 Chris,
842
843 I realized my response to your question was incomplete so let me expound
844 further.
845
846 The general idea for validating a user name from our bulletin board
847 software would be something like this:
848 a) check length against max nick length and shorten as required
849 b) search for incompatible characters such as * or @ in the user name
850 and simply remove
851 c) check for space in the user name and replace them with and underscore
852 character _
853 d) remember this nick (if it differs from the user name for the forums)
854 and email the nick with instructions on how to connect to IRC to the new
855 user
856 I may have forgot some details but it?s totally doable.
857
858 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Jan 13 13:06:28 2005
859 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
860 Date: Thu Jan 13 13:06:39 2005
861 Subject: [IRCServices] RE: my recent feature request
862 In-Reply-To: <41E63AA7.3090000@earthlink.net>
863 References: <41E3E0DE.1040505@earthlink.net> <41E4AD16.1090908@frostycoolslug.com> <41E4C2E5.5040101@earthlink.net> <43226.62.231.155.3.1105529514.squirrel@62.231.155.3>
864 <41E63AA7.3090000@earthlink.net>
865 Message-ID: <41E6E2D4.7090204@winbot.co.uk>
866
867 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
868 Hash: SHA1
869
870 If you read RFC 1459 there is a BNF specification for a nickname, it's
871 actually a pretty small number of valid characters, also you cant start
872 a nick with a number, or with a -, but these can follow on in the nickname.
873
874 Also BE VERY CAREFUL to check for forbidden nicknames etc, you can
875 segfault services if you try and do things with a forbidden or suspended
876 nickname.
877
878 youph@earthlink.net wrote:
879 | Chris Jenkinson wrote:
880 |
881 |> On Wed, January 12, 2005 6:25 am, youph@earthlink.net said:
882 |>
883 |>
884 |>> I would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to set a user
885 |>> password using an MD5 hash, when using MD5 encrypted passwords with
886 |>> services. Normally, a user registers a nick and provides a plaintext
887 |>> password. This plaintext pass is then hashed and stored in the db (if
888 |>> encryption is enabled which I am saying is true in this instance.) I
889 |>> would like the ability for Services Admins to be able to *directly* set
890 |>> this parameter in a nick record. I.E. I would like to be able to change
891 |>> the *hashed* passwords of users. The only command for dealing with MD5
892 |>> passwords is resetting. It would seem trivial to add the ability to
893 |>> simply overwrite the MD5 hash parameter in the nick record. The reason
894 |>> being I am trying to automate a registration process that starts with a
895 |>> web forum registration and will (hopefully) also register a nick name on
896 |>> IRC for the user. I would only have the MD5 hash of the user's password
897 |>> though, which leads me to this request.
898 |>>
899 |>
900 |>
901 |> Kind of off-topic here and out of curiousity, how do you aim to handle a
902 |> situation where someone registers an account on your website which isn't
903 |> usable as an IRC nick (for example "Hello Bob")? I've been considering a
904 |> problem like this for some time and I'd like to see how someone else is
905 |> aiming to do it.
906 |>
907 |> Chris
908 |>
909 |>
910 |>
911 | Chris,
912 |
913 | I realized my response to your question was incomplete so let me expound
914 | further.
915 |
916 | The general idea for validating a user name from our bulletin board
917 | software would be something like this:
918 | a) check length against max nick length and shorten as required
919 | b) search for incompatible characters such as * or @ in the user name
920 | and simply remove
921 | c) check for space in the user name and replace them with and underscore
922 | character _
923 | d) remember this nick (if it differs from the user name for the forums)
924 | and email the nick with instructions on how to connect to IRC to the new
925 | user
926 | I may have forgot some details but it?s totally doable.
927 |
928 | ------------------------------------------------------------------
929 | To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
930 | http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
931 |
932 |
933
934 - --
935 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
936 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
937 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
938 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
939 - --
940 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
941 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
942 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
943
944 iD8DBQFB5uLU0k42Wxli/BARAut2AJ0W1G0gt+9TMPe9ugWTKFsf7fm1FwCfdEvT
945 RaurRTXx3cuitYxzWi6AHEo=
946 =l4lm
947 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
948 From ianj at esper.net Thu Jan 20 14:54:59 2005
949 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
950 Date: Thu Jan 20 14:55:55 2005
951 Subject: [IRCServices] EsperNet FTP service outage
952 Message-ID: <41F036C3.5050907@esper.net>
953
954
955 Hi, all.
956
957 Just a heads-up, FTP services have been down for a few days due to
958 something wonky with a recent apt-get upgrade between ProFTPD and
959 rlinetd. I have cleared up the issue which caused ProFTPD to not work
960 properly and things are working again.
961
962 My apologies I managed to inconvenience anyone.
963
964 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
965
966 -----
967 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official
968 EsperNet business)
969 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
970 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
971
972 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
973
974 From andrew at wtfigo.co.uk Fri Jan 21 10:19:31 2005
975 From: andrew at wtfigo.co.uk (Andrew Kempe)
976 Date: Fri Jan 21 10:20:37 2005
977 Subject: [IRCServices] EsperNet FTP service outage
978 In-Reply-To: <41F036C3.5050907@esper.net>
979 Message-ID: <20050121182029.2DEDBF662A6@sakura.ian-justman.com>
980
981 We're paying damn good money for this service... When can we expect
982 compensation? >;-)
983
984 Have a good weekend... :)
985
986 Andrew
987
988 > -----Original Message-----
989 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
990 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf
991 > Of Ian R. Justman
992 > Sent: 20 January 2005 22:55
993 > To: IRC Services General Mailing List
994 > Subject: [IRCServices] EsperNet FTP service outage
995 >
996 >
997 > Hi, all.
998 >
999 > Just a heads-up, FTP services have been down for a few days
1000 > due to something wonky with a recent apt-get upgrade between
1001 > ProFTPD and rlinetd. I have cleared up the issue which
1002 > caused ProFTPD to not work properly and things are working again.
1003 >
1004 > My apologies I managed to inconvenience anyone.
1005 >
1006 > --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
1007 >
1008 > -----
1009 > Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official
1010 > EsperNet business)
1011 > Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network Server
1012 > Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
1013 >
1014 > PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
1015 >
1016 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1017 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1018 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1019
1020 From linus at webdevint.com Fri Jan 21 12:00:03 2005
1021 From: linus at webdevint.com (Linus)
1022 Date: Fri Jan 21 11:59:04 2005
1023 Subject: [IRCServices] EsperNet FTP service outage
1024 References: <20050121182029.2DEDBF662A6@sakura.ian-justman.com>
1025 Message-ID: <002101c4fff3$cc11a220$0801a8c0@webdevint.com>
1026
1027 Hear! Hear!
1028
1029 Have a rotten weekend ;P
1030
1031 Cheers!
1032
1033 Wayne
1034
1035 ----- Original Message -----
1036 From: "Andrew Kempe" <andrew@wtfigo.co.uk>
1037 To: "'IRC Services General Mailing List'"
1038 <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
1039 Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 1:19 PM
1040 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] EsperNet FTP service outage
1041
1042
1043 > We're paying damn good money for this service... When can we expect
1044 > compensation? >;-)
1045 >
1046 > Have a good weekend... :)
1047 >
1048 > Andrew
1049 >
1050 > > -----Original Message-----
1051 > > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
1052 > > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf
1053 > > Of Ian R. Justman
1054 > > Sent: 20 January 2005 22:55
1055 > > To: IRC Services General Mailing List
1056 > > Subject: [IRCServices] EsperNet FTP service outage
1057 > >
1058 > >
1059 > > Hi, all.
1060 > >
1061 > > Just a heads-up, FTP services have been down for a few days
1062 > > due to something wonky with a recent apt-get upgrade between
1063 > > ProFTPD and rlinetd. I have cleared up the issue which
1064 > > caused ProFTPD to not work properly and things are working again.
1065 > >
1066 > > My apologies I managed to inconvenience anyone.
1067 > >
1068 > > --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
1069 > >
1070 > > -----
1071 > > Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official
1072 > > EsperNet business)
1073 > > Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network Server
1074 > > Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
1075 > >
1076 > > PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
1077 > >
1078 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1079 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1080 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1081 >
1082 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1083 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1084 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1085 >
1086
1087
1088 From azoff at se.linux.org Sat Jan 22 02:54:51 2005
1089 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
1090 Date: Sat Jan 22 02:55:06 2005
1091 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1092 Message-ID: <41F230FB.60602@se.linux.org>
1093
1094 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1095 Hash: SHA1
1096
1097 Hi!
1098
1099 I am using the http part for getting a backup of the current databases.
1100 When I contact the httpd this shows up in the log:
1101 [Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: sock_new(): out of buffer space!
1102 [Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: accept(4): Unable to create socket \
1103 ~ structure (out of buffer space?)
1104 Could anyone tell me what's wrong? I have checked the configs and can't
1105 find anything that could do this. From the logs I can only say that it
1106 seams like the acctive connecttion never get any timeout, nor get
1107 removed from the stack of something like that.
1108
1109
1110 Regards,
1111 - --
1112 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1113 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1114 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1115 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1116
1117 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1118 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1119 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1120
1121 iD8DBQFB8jD6eY7jmtvbDP0RAh94AKCsSDzEq8hcQLT2UuM58IkskZ7FMgCeO139
1122 cO0OpfCr2/DQNDhKyTA0i48=
1123 =FKnE
1124 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1125 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Jan 22 23:37:08 2005
1126 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1127 Date: Sat Jan 22 06:38:35 2005
1128 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1129 In-Reply-To: <41F230FB.60602@se.linux.org>
1130 Message-ID: <41f26556.05017@achurch.org>
1131
1132 >I am using the http part for getting a backup of the current databases.
1133 >When I contact the httpd this shows up in the log:
1134 >[Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: sock_new(): out of buffer space!
1135 >[Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: accept(4): Unable to create socket \
1136 >~ structure (out of buffer space?)
1137
1138 Try increasing your network buffer sizes in ircservices.conf
1139 (NetBufferLimit).
1140
1141 --Andrew Church
1142 achurch@achurch.org
1143 http://achurch.org/
1144 From azoff at se.linux.org Sat Jan 22 10:25:54 2005
1145 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
1146 Date: Sat Jan 22 10:26:35 2005
1147 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1148 In-Reply-To: <41f26556.05017@achurch.org>
1149 References: <41f26556.05017@achurch.org>
1150 Message-ID: <41F29AB2.9040200@se.linux.org>
1151
1152 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1153 Hash: SHA1
1154
1155 Andrew Church wrote:
1156 |>I am using the http part for getting a backup of the current databases.
1157 |>When I contact the httpd this shows up in the log:
1158 |>[Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: sock_new(): out of buffer space!
1159 |>[Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: accept(4): Unable to create socket \
1160 |>~ structure (out of buffer space?)
1161 |
1162 |
1163 | Try increasing your network buffer sizes in ircservices.conf
1164 | (NetBufferLimit).
1165
1166 Just incresed it, now I got:
1167 NetBufferSize 12582912 3145728
1168 but I still get the same error, I think there is enough memory, or what
1169 do you think I should set it to?
1170
1171 - --
1172 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1173 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1174 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1175 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1176
1177 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1178 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1179 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1180
1181 iD8DBQFB8pqxeY7jmtvbDP0RAqMeAJwJePO4NWc4DsHDw5KScTqQ8kWr0gCgzP1W
1182 eA465OV/yBcPzyrwoZPrVhg=
1183 =KZ5W
1184 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1185 From phan70m at gmail.com Sat Jan 22 12:18:08 2005
1186 From: phan70m at gmail.com (Anton Wolkov)
1187 Date: Sat Jan 22 12:18:25 2005
1188 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1189 In-Reply-To: <41F29AB2.9040200@se.linux.org>
1190 References: <41f26556.05017@achurch.org> <41F29AB2.9040200@se.linux.org>
1191 Message-ID: <d50f59a0050122121877d98573@mail.gmail.com>
1192
1193 I am sorry to say but the httpd module is far from being perfect, I
1194 used it for backups too but then I realised exporting it though cron
1195 and using sftp (or ftp or rsync) to fetch it is a much better
1196 solution.
1197
1198
1199 On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:25:54 +0100, Torbj?rn Svensson
1200 <azoff@se.linux.org> wrote:
1201 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1202 > Hash: SHA1
1203 >
1204 > Andrew Church wrote:
1205 > |>I am using the http part for getting a backup of the current databases.
1206 > |>When I contact the httpd this shows up in the log:
1207 > |>[Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: sock_new(): out of buffer space!
1208 > |>[Jan 22 10:00:01 2005] sockets: accept(4): Unable to create socket \
1209 > |>~ structure (out of buffer space?)
1210 > |
1211 > |
1212 > | Try increasing your network buffer sizes in ircservices.conf
1213 > | (NetBufferLimit).
1214 >
1215 > Just incresed it, now I got:
1216 > NetBufferSize 12582912 3145728
1217 > but I still get the same error, I think there is enough memory, or what
1218 > do you think I should set it to?
1219 >
1220 > - --
1221 > ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1222 > ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1223 > ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1224 > ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1225 >
1226 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1227 > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1228 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1229 >
1230 > iD8DBQFB8pqxeY7jmtvbDP0RAqMeAJwJePO4NWc4DsHDw5KScTqQ8kWr0gCgzP1W
1231 > eA465OV/yBcPzyrwoZPrVhg=
1232 > =KZ5W
1233 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1234 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1235 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1236 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1237 >
1238 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Jan 23 08:25:39 2005
1239 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1240 Date: Sat Jan 22 15:28:32 2005
1241 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1242 In-Reply-To: <41F29AB2.9040200@se.linux.org>
1243 Message-ID: <41f2e191.05123@achurch.org>
1244
1245 >Just incresed it, now I got:
1246 >NetBufferSize 12582912 3145728
1247
1248 It makes no sense to have the first value greater than the second--
1249 read the documentation! 3MB is almost certainly not enough for an XML
1250 export if your databases are of any significant size.
1251
1252 --Andrew Church
1253 achurch@achurch.org
1254 http://achurch.org/
1255 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Jan 23 08:29:07 2005
1256 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1257 Date: Sat Jan 22 15:30:14 2005
1258 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1259 In-Reply-To: <41f2e191.05123@achurch.org>
1260 Message-ID: <41f2e1f1.05141@achurch.org>
1261
1262 >>Just incresed it, now I got:
1263 >>NetBufferSize 12582912 3145728
1264 >
1265 > It makes no sense to have the first value greater than the second--
1266
1267 Oops, I was remembering backwards. 3MB is probably still too small,
1268 though.
1269
1270 --Andrew Church
1271 achurch@achurch.org
1272 http://achurch.org/
1273 From azoff at se.linux.org Sun Jan 23 02:43:15 2005
1274 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
1275 Date: Sun Jan 23 02:43:04 2005
1276 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1277 In-Reply-To: <41f2e1f1.05141@achurch.org>
1278 References: <41f2e1f1.05141@achurch.org>
1279 Message-ID: <41F37FC3.1070507@se.linux.org>
1280
1281 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1282 Hash: SHA1
1283
1284 Andrew Church wrote:
1285 |>>Just incresed it, now I got:
1286 |>>NetBufferSize 12582912 3145728
1287 |>
1288 |> It makes no sense to have the first value greater than the second--
1289 |
1290 |
1291 | Oops, I was remembering backwards. 3MB is probably still too small,
1292 | though.
1293
1294 The XML-file is about 170k when exported. Is it still too small?
1295
1296 - --
1297 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1298 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1299 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1300 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1301
1302 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1303 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1304 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1305
1306 iD8DBQFB83/CeY7jmtvbDP0RAu5YAJ97TOT46LM4CRoAWbCLlI5wmP1CGgCfX+Og
1307 N9wrLRQh+qR0uGQR9SsaiY4=
1308 =caQ7
1309 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1310 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Jan 23 21:12:18 2005
1311 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1312 Date: Sun Jan 23 04:13:51 2005
1313 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1314 In-Reply-To: <41F37FC3.1070507@se.linux.org>
1315 Message-ID: <41f394f2.03540@achurch.org>
1316
1317 >| Oops, I was remembering backwards. 3MB is probably still too small,
1318 >| though.
1319 >
1320 >The XML-file is about 170k when exported. Is it still too small?
1321
1322 Hmm, in that case it shouldn't be a problem, unless you try grabbing
1323 lots of them at once. What does OperServ STATS NETWORK say about buffer
1324 usage before and after trying to get the XML data?
1325
1326 --Andrew Church
1327 achurch@achurch.org
1328 http://achurch.org/
1329 From jerome at gmanmi.tv Sun Jan 23 21:05:56 2005
1330 From: jerome at gmanmi.tv (JM)
1331 Date: Sun Jan 23 21:06:09 2005
1332 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem on IRCservices
1333 Message-ID: <200501241305.56784.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1334
1335 Hi All,
1336
1337 I was wondering if anyone had encountered this kind of problem..
1338
1339 [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] IRC Services 5.0.44 starting up
1340 [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] httpd/main: Listening on :8080
1341 [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] Read error from server: Broken pipe
1342
1343
1344 Im using bahamut 1.8.3 with the latest IRC Services..
1345
1346 Is this a bahamut problem or IRCService? Is there a way to fix this?
1347
1348 TIA
1349
1350 From gregk at WWWpages.com Sun Jan 23 21:08:40 2005
1351 From: gregk at WWWpages.com (Gregory King)
1352 Date: Sun Jan 23 21:08:09 2005
1353 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem on IRCservices
1354 In-Reply-To: <200501241305.56784.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1355 References: <200501241305.56784.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1356 Message-ID: <2888.69.175.18.184.1106543320.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
1357
1358 looks like a local (read you) configuration problem to me...
1359
1360
1361
1362 On Sun, January 23, 2005 9:05 pm, JM said:
1363 > Hi All,
1364 >
1365 > I was wondering if anyone had encountered this kind of problem..
1366 >
1367 > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] IRC Services 5.0.44 starting up
1368 > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] httpd/main: Listening on :8080
1369 > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] Read error from server: Broken pipe
1370 >
1371 >
1372 > Im using bahamut 1.8.3 with the latest IRC Services..
1373 >
1374 > Is this a bahamut problem or IRCService? Is there a way to fix this?
1375 >
1376 > TIA
1377 >
1378 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1379 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1380 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1381 >
1382
1383 From azoff at se.linux.org Mon Jan 24 00:09:20 2005
1384 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
1385 Date: Mon Jan 24 00:08:57 2005
1386 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1387 In-Reply-To: <41f394f2.03540@achurch.org>
1388 References: <41f394f2.03540@achurch.org>
1389 Message-ID: <41F4AD30.7030204@se.linux.org>
1390
1391 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1392 Hash: SHA1
1393
1394 Andrew Church wrote:
1395 | Hmm, in that case it shouldn't be a problem, unless you try grabbing
1396 | lots of them at once. What does OperServ STATS NETWORK say about buffer
1397 | usage before and after trying to get the XML data?
1398
1399 First I send a 'stats network' to operserv.
1400 [09:00:53] <Tobbe> STATS NETWORK
1401 [09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Data received: 8 kB
1402 [09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Data sent: 12 kB
1403 [09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Server socket buffers: 8 kB (1%)
1404 [09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Total socket buffers: 16 kB (1%)
1405
1406 Here I get the XML-output _ONE_ time, then I get the stats again.
1407
1408 [09:02:50] <Tobbe> STATS NETWORK
1409 [09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Data received: 8 kB
1410 [09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Data sent: 12 kB
1411 [09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Server socket buffers: 8 kB (1%)
1412 [09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Total socket buffers: 4194264 kB
1413
1414 As you can see, the socket buffer is somehow full(?) or maybe
1415 overflowed. I am no experienced programmer, but one thing I can tell is
1416 that it seams like the buffer never get's cleared. If you need anything
1417 else, just tell me.
1418
1419
1420 Thanks,
1421 - --
1422 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1423 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1424 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1425 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1426
1427 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1428 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1429 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1430
1431 iD8DBQFB9K0weY7jmtvbDP0RAooeAKC6SEYqTMBW3ogpDMsBuzwlFvFFlwCgx4BJ
1432 1So04ZEao+hwEnk708kIetE=
1433 =b3JH
1434 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1435 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Jan 24 17:53:48 2005
1436 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1437 Date: Mon Jan 24 00:58:38 2005
1438 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1439 In-Reply-To: <41F4AD30.7030204@se.linux.org>
1440 Message-ID: <41f4b8b7.04554@achurch.org>
1441
1442 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1443 >Hash: SHA1
1444 >
1445 >Andrew Church wrote:
1446 >| Hmm, in that case it shouldn't be a problem, unless you try grabbing
1447 >| lots of them at once. What does OperServ STATS NETWORK say about buffer
1448 >| usage before and after trying to get the XML data?
1449 >
1450 >First I send a 'stats network' to operserv.
1451 >[09:00:53] <Tobbe> STATS NETWORK
1452 >[09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Data received: 8 kB
1453 >[09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Data sent: 12 kB
1454 >[09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Server socket buffers: 8 kB (1%)
1455 >[09:00:53] -OperServ(service@host)- Total socket buffers: 16 kB (1%)
1456 >
1457 >Here I get the XML-output _ONE_ time, then I get the stats again.
1458 >
1459 >[09:02:50] <Tobbe> STATS NETWORK
1460 >[09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Data received: 8 kB
1461 >[09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Data sent: 12 kB
1462 >[09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Server socket buffers: 8 kB (1%)
1463 >[09:02:50] -OperServ(service@host)- Total socket buffers: 4194264 kB
1464
1465 Which is equivalent to -40kB, so it looks like something's removing
1466 more buffer than it should be. I'll look into this, and also try and get
1467 Services 5.1 alpha out soon (which has an improved version of the sockets
1468 code--unfortunately not easily mergeable into 5.0). Thanks for your help
1469 in debugging this.
1470
1471 --Andrew Church
1472 achurch@achurch.org
1473 http://achurch.org/
1474 From azoff at se.linux.org Mon Jan 24 06:27:57 2005
1475 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
1476 Date: Mon Jan 24 06:28:17 2005
1477 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1478 In-Reply-To: <41f4b8b7.04554@achurch.org>
1479 References: <41f4b8b7.04554@achurch.org>
1480 Message-ID: <41F505ED.4050803@se.linux.org>
1481
1482 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1483 Hash: SHA1
1484
1485 Andrew Church wrote:
1486 | Which is equivalent to -40kB, so it looks like something's removing
1487 | more buffer than it should be. I'll look into this, and also try and get
1488 | Services 5.1 alpha out soon (which has an improved version of the sockets
1489 | code--unfortunately not easily mergeable into 5.0). Thanks for your help
1490 | in debugging this.
1491
1492 Oki, if you wan't me to test anything, just tell..
1493
1494 Is there anyway to make ircservices save the databases when they recieve
1495 ~ like the HUP signal or something so I could save the current info to
1496 XML using a shellscript?
1497
1498 For ex:
1499 killall -HUP ircservices && ./ircservices -export > foo.xml
1500
1501 Just an idea I got.
1502
1503 - --
1504 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1505 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1506 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1507 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1508
1509 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1510 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1511 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1512
1513 iD8DBQFB9QXseY7jmtvbDP0RAqN4AJ9GBhv9GpQMcjVptDizM15NerGs1gCgmisq
1514 MuYEGubBpezBBmXKSQtmPJc=
1515 =SKHJ
1516 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1517 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jan 25 08:43:53 2005
1518 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1519 Date: Mon Jan 24 15:48:42 2005
1520 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1521 In-Reply-To: <41F505ED.4050803@se.linux.org>
1522 Message-ID: <41f5894b.05310@achurch.org>
1523
1524 >Is there anyway to make ircservices save the databases when they recieve
1525 >~ like the HUP signal or something so I could save the current info to
1526 >XML using a shellscript?
1527 >
1528 >For ex:
1529 >killall -HUP ircservices && ./ircservices -export > foo.xml
1530
1531 That's an interesting thought; the problem, of course, is that saving
1532 the databases isn't an instantaneous activity, so you'd need a sleep of
1533 some length in the middle. I'll think about it.
1534
1535 --Andrew Church
1536 achurch@achurch.org
1537 http://achurch.org/
1538 From smkelly at zombie.org Mon Jan 24 20:14:19 2005
1539 From: smkelly at zombie.org (Sean Kelly)
1540 Date: Mon Jan 24 20:14:29 2005
1541 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1542 In-Reply-To: <41f5894b.05310@achurch.org>
1543 References: <41F505ED.4050803@se.linux.org> <41f5894b.05310@achurch.org>
1544 Message-ID: <20050125041419.GA18503@edgemaster.zombie.org>
1545
1546 On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:43:53AM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
1547 > >Is there anyway to make ircservices save the databases when they recieve
1548 > >~ like the HUP signal or something so I could save the current info to
1549 > >XML using a shellscript?
1550 > >
1551 > >For ex:
1552 > >killall -HUP ircservices && ./ircservices -export > foo.xml
1553 >
1554 > That's an interesting thought; the problem, of course, is that saving
1555 > the databases isn't an instantaneous activity, so you'd need a sleep of
1556 > some length in the middle. I'll think about it.
1557
1558 Can't you hold an exclusive lock (flock, lockf, etc) on the database while
1559 writing them and then release it when done writing? That way, the
1560 `ircservices -export` could try to obtain a shared lock (since it is
1561 read-only) and it will spin while the DBs are still being written.
1562
1563 --
1564 Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
1565 smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org
1566 -------------- next part --------------
1567 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
1568 Name: not available
1569 Type: application/pgp-signature
1570 Size: 187 bytes
1571 Desc: not available
1572 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050124/f3f7176c/attachment.pgp
1573 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jan 25 14:52:08 2005
1574 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1575 Date: Mon Jan 24 22:00:16 2005
1576 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1577 In-Reply-To: <20050125041419.GA18503@edgemaster.zombie.org>
1578 Message-ID: <41f5e06b.06470@achurch.org>
1579
1580 >Can't you hold an exclusive lock (flock, lockf, etc) on the database while
1581 >writing them and then release it when done writing? That way, the
1582 >`ircservices -export` could try to obtain a shared lock (since it is
1583 >read-only) and it will spin while the DBs are still being written.
1584
1585 True, but since there are several database files that would mean
1586 having to check/lock several files, which is inconvenient.
1587
1588 On second thought, Services always creates a lock file (.lock by
1589 default) in the data directory while it's writing, and refuses to write
1590 if the file exists, so you could do something like (in Perl):
1591
1592 sysopen LOCK, "/.../.lock", O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0 or die "locked\n";
1593 system("ircservices -export");
1594 close LOCK;
1595 unlink "/.../.lock";
1596
1597 --Andrew Church
1598 achurch@achurch.org
1599 http://achurch.org/
1600 From jerome at gmanmi.tv Mon Jan 24 23:54:10 2005
1601 From: jerome at gmanmi.tv (JM)
1602 Date: Mon Jan 24 23:54:25 2005
1603 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem on IRCservices
1604 In-Reply-To: <2888.69.175.18.184.1106543320.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
1605 References: <200501241305.56784.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1606 <2888.69.175.18.184.1106543320.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
1607 Message-ID: <200501251554.10736.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1608
1609 okie i did use the sample confs... i only replaced those which are required
1610 based on the IRC daemon I used... I tried using bahamut and unreal but Im
1611 still the same error...
1612
1613 can someone help me on this?
1614
1615 if possible can anyone here send me a working confs for the test irc box..
1616
1617 TIA,
1618
1619 On Monday 24 January 2005 13:08, Gregory King wrote:
1620 > looks like a local (read you) configuration problem to me...
1621 >
1622 > On Sun, January 23, 2005 9:05 pm, JM said:
1623 > > Hi All,
1624 > >
1625 > > I was wondering if anyone had encountered this kind of problem..
1626 > >
1627 > > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] IRC Services 5.0.44 starting up
1628 > > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] httpd/main: Listening on :8080
1629 > > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] Read error from server: Broken pipe
1630 > >
1631 > >
1632 > > Im using bahamut 1.8.3 with the latest IRC Services..
1633 > >
1634 > > Is this a bahamut problem or IRCService? Is there a way to fix this?
1635 > >
1636 > > TIA
1637 > >
1638 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1639 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1640 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1641
1642 From azoff at se.linux.org Tue Jan 25 00:02:51 2005
1643 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
1644 Date: Tue Jan 25 00:02:36 2005
1645 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem on IRCservices
1646 In-Reply-To: <200501251554.10736.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1647 References: <200501241305.56784.jerome@gmanmi.tv> <2888.69.175.18.184.1106543320.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
1648 <200501251554.10736.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1649 Message-ID: <41F5FD2B.6080700@se.linux.org>
1650
1651 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1652 Hash: SHA1
1653
1654 JM wrote:
1655 | okie i did use the sample confs... i only replaced those which are
1656 required
1657 | based on the IRC daemon I used... I tried using bahamut and unreal but Im
1658 | still the same error...
1659
1660 I also got something like that error some days ago.
1661 After I restarted bahamut and recompiled (upgraded) ircservices it works
1662 again.
1663
1664
1665 - --
1666 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1667 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1668 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1669 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1670
1671 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1672 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1673 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1674
1675 iD8DBQFB9f0reY7jmtvbDP0RAthrAKDNiLEHN+LTEujLULFn0UpVUGGZgQCfUgAq
1676 0u5MJ9nsBtffGa8O1d84MWI=
1677 =YkDu
1678 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1679 From azoff at se.linux.org Tue Jan 25 00:05:58 2005
1680 From: azoff at se.linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn_Svensson?=)
1681 Date: Tue Jan 25 00:05:38 2005
1682 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1683 In-Reply-To: <41f5e06b.06470@achurch.org>
1684 References: <41f5e06b.06470@achurch.org>
1685 Message-ID: <41F5FDE6.9040402@se.linux.org>
1686
1687 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1688 Hash: SHA1
1689
1690 Andrew Church wrote:
1691 | On second thought, Services always creates a lock file (.lock by
1692 | default) in the data directory while it's writing, and refuses to write
1693 | if the file exists, so you could do something like (in Perl):
1694 |
1695 | sysopen LOCK, "/.../.lock", O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0 or die "locked\n";
1696 | system("ircservices -export");
1697 | close LOCK;
1698 | unlink "/.../.lock";
1699
1700 Ahh, nice. Just the signal missing ;)
1701
1702 Also, if ircservices is started with -export it will generat some rows
1703 in the log, here's an cut-n-paste of it:
1704 [Jan 24 19:04:01 2005] IRC Services 5.0.44 starting up
1705 [Jan 24 19:04:01 2005] Terminating, reason unknown
1706
1707 The reason shouldn't been 'unkown' ;)
1708
1709 - --
1710 ~ .''`. Torbj?rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
1711 ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
1712 ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net | http://azoff.tty0.org
1713 ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org
1714
1715 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1716 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
1717 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
1718
1719 iD8DBQFB9f3leY7jmtvbDP0RAgjLAKCAEAkNEw7nPQLpDNViTMtcbztrbwCeJOUd
1720 ZRrNKsxF/+KE5X8nt8Ka7Q8=
1721 =U/1o
1722 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1723 From jerome at gmanmi.tv Tue Jan 25 00:45:13 2005
1724 From: jerome at gmanmi.tv (JM)
1725 Date: Tue Jan 25 00:45:29 2005
1726 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem on IRCservices
1727 In-Reply-To: <CCEMIFKLCHLPPKOKPNNGMEIBCAAA.demurp2@uky.edu>
1728 References: <CCEMIFKLCHLPPKOKPNNGMEIBCAAA.demurp2@uky.edu>
1729 Message-ID: <200501251645.13030.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
1730
1731 yup... i am..
1732
1733
1734 On Tuesday 25 January 2005 15:59, Eric Murphy wrote:
1735 > Are you running the IRC server and services on the same machine? (imo you
1736 > should be, if you aren't)
1737 >
1738 > Erusun
1739 > Stratics IRC Network
1740 >
1741 > -----Original Message-----
1742 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
1743 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of JM
1744 > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:54 AM
1745 > To: gregk@WWWpages.com; IRC Services General Mailing List
1746 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Problem on IRCservices
1747 >
1748 >
1749 > okie i did use the sample confs... i only replaced those which are required
1750 > based on the IRC daemon I used... I tried using bahamut and unreal but Im
1751 > still the same error...
1752 >
1753 > can someone help me on this?
1754 >
1755 > if possible can anyone here send me a working confs for the test irc box..
1756 >
1757 > TIA,
1758 >
1759 > On Monday 24 January 2005 13:08, Gregory King wrote:
1760 > > looks like a local (read you) configuration problem to me...
1761 > >
1762 > > On Sun, January 23, 2005 9:05 pm, JM said:
1763 > > > Hi All,
1764 > > >
1765 > > > I was wondering if anyone had encountered this kind of problem..
1766 > > >
1767 > > > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] IRC Services 5.0.44 starting up
1768 > > > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] httpd/main: Listening on :8080
1769 > > > [Jan 21 17:00:13 2005] Read error from server: Broken pipe
1770 > > >
1771 > > >
1772 > > > Im using bahamut 1.8.3 with the latest IRC Services..
1773 > > >
1774 > > > Is this a bahamut problem or IRCService? Is there a way to fix this?
1775 > > >
1776 > > > TIA
1777 > > >
1778 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1779 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1780 > > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1781 >
1782 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1783 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1784 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1785
1786 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Jan 25 18:35:15 2005
1787 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1788 Date: Tue Jan 25 01:37:23 2005
1789 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.45 released
1790 Message-ID: <41f6134b.45101@achurch.org>
1791
1792 Services 5.0.45 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
1793
1794 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
1795 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
1796
1797 a0e54d9d20dfc68eac450ae3724dd8b1 ircservices-5.0.45.tar.gz
1798 0f86b0c3ed6dd605f8ef14bc3ae6f4bc ircservices-5.0.45.diff.gz
1799 06c1a6304aaf0818cecc7d396417b080 ircservices-5.0.45-1.i386.rpm
1800 f66465c2a4a2ddf41d6a8c3366b4bff0 ircservices_5.0.45-1_i386.deb
1801
1802 The mirrors should have it shortly.
1803
1804 Aside from a minor bug fix, this release is primarily to add support
1805 for importing HybServ databases. Upgrade at your leisure.
1806
1807 Changes in version 5.0.45
1808 -------------------------
1809 2005/01/21 Added HybServ support to convert-db. Suggested by
1810 Stanislav Zahariev <sofit@evronet.tv>
1811 2005/01/21 convert-db is now recompiled properly if the compilation
1812 options passed to the configure script are changed.
1813 2005/01/13 IRC operators are now properly shown the operator version
1814 of ChanServ HELP LIST. Reported by Kieron Thwaites
1815 <ron2k@webmail.co.za>
1816
1817 --Andrew Church
1818 achurch@achurch.org
1819 http://achurch.org/
1820 From andrew at wtfigo.co.uk Wed Jan 26 14:21:06 2005
1821 From: andrew at wtfigo.co.uk (Andrew Kempe)
1822 Date: Wed Jan 26 14:21:16 2005
1823 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.45 released
1824 In-Reply-To: <41f6134b.45101@achurch.org>
1825 Message-ID: <20050126222115.3FE77F87A6C@sakura.ian-justman.com>
1826
1827 Just FYI,
1828
1829 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ gives:
1830
1831 The requested resource could not be found.
1832
1833 Andrew
1834
1835 > -----Original Message-----
1836 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
1837 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf
1838 > Of Andrew Church
1839 > Sent: 25 January 2005 09:35
1840 > To: services
1841 > Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.45 released
1842 >
1843 > Services 5.0.45 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
1844 >
1845 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
1846 > ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
1847 >
1848 > a0e54d9d20dfc68eac450ae3724dd8b1 ircservices-5.0.45.tar.gz
1849 > 0f86b0c3ed6dd605f8ef14bc3ae6f4bc ircservices-5.0.45.diff.gz
1850 > 06c1a6304aaf0818cecc7d396417b080
1851 > ircservices-5.0.45-1.i386.rpm
1852 > f66465c2a4a2ddf41d6a8c3366b4bff0 ircservices_5.0.45-1_i386.deb
1853 >
1854 > The mirrors should have it shortly.
1855 >
1856 > Aside from a minor bug fix, this release is primarily to
1857 > add support for importing HybServ databases. Upgrade at your leisure.
1858 >
1859 > Changes in version 5.0.45
1860 > -------------------------
1861 > 2005/01/21 Added HybServ support to convert-db. Suggested by
1862 > Stanislav Zahariev <sofit@evronet.tv>
1863 > 2005/01/21 convert-db is now recompiled properly if the compilation
1864 > options passed to the configure script are changed.
1865 > 2005/01/13 IRC operators are now properly shown the
1866 > operator version
1867 > of ChanServ HELP LIST. Reported by Kieron Thwaites
1868 > <ron2k@webmail.co.za>
1869 >
1870 > --Andrew Church
1871 > achurch@achurch.org
1872 > http://achurch.org/
1873 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1874 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1875 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1876
1877 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Jan 27 09:47:07 2005
1878 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
1879 Date: Wed Jan 26 16:47:44 2005
1880 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.45 released
1881 In-Reply-To: <20050126222115.3FE77F87A6C@sakura.ian-justman.com>
1882 Message-ID: <41f83a1f.70116@achurch.org>
1883
1884 >Just FYI,
1885 >
1886 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ gives:
1887 >
1888 >The requested resource could not be found.
1889
1890 Oops, that should be www.ircservices.esper.net... I'll get those
1891 straightened out ASAP.
1892
1893 --Andrew Church
1894 achurch@achurch.org
1895 http://achurch.org/
1896 From phan70m at gmail.com Thu Jan 27 07:52:14 2005
1897 From: phan70m at gmail.com (Anton Wolkov)
1898 Date: Thu Jan 27 07:52:57 2005
1899 Subject: [IRCServices] out of buffer?
1900 In-Reply-To: <41F5FDE6.9040402@se.linux.org>
1901 References: <41f5e06b.06470@achurch.org> <41F5FDE6.9040402@se.linux.org>
1902 Message-ID: <d50f59a0050127075256b29adb@mail.gmail.com>
1903
1904 a nice feature would be a module (like database/exportxml) that would
1905 have a parameter, how many minutes to wait between an xml export and a
1906 parameter for target filename, that would eliminate the need for
1907 crontab.
1908 also if your into innovation and all, consider implementing sqlite to
1909 ircservices, it's so much more expandable and would also make services
1910 fly on select operations.
1911 the httpd module is not most frequently used mainly because of it's
1912 stability issues, it may be a good idea to have an export module for
1913 html pages and then to serve them over apache, this would also provide
1914 more options to integrate services to existing websites.
1915 other nice feature i think would be widely used is the vhost parameter
1916 for nickserv, it is supported by many popular protocols.
1917 --
1918 PHANTOm
1919 http://www.irc.nix.co.il/ -- irc.nix.co.il
1920 From kfiresun at ix.netcom.com Thu Jan 27 10:24:14 2005
1921 From: kfiresun at ix.netcom.com (Everett B. Simonds)
1922 Date: Thu Jan 27 10:24:22 2005
1923 Subject: [IRCServices] Database WAS: out of buffer?
1924 In-Reply-To: <d50f59a0050127075256b29adb@mail.gmail.com>
1925 References: <41f5e06b.06470@achurch.org> <41F5FDE6.9040402@se.linux.org>
1926 <d50f59a0050127075256b29adb@mail.gmail.com>
1927 Message-ID: <41F931CE.9090807@ix.netcom.com>
1928
1929 I don't really for see the need to embed a whole SQL engine into
1930 services. I have looked at some of the database code in there and I'm
1931 wondering if the system would benefit from having some sort of write
1932 behind log so that services doesn't burn time rewriting the whole
1933 database every time it flushes them out to disk. This would certainly
1934 help those who have a significantly sized user base. This would also
1935 eliminate the need to have two copies of the database on disk while it
1936 writes it out, good for those who might be strapped for disk space.
1937
1938 If you're going to embed any sort of database option into services, you
1939 might as well use the Berkeley DB system from Sleepy Cat. No need to
1940 get fancy with an SQL parser/optimizer for something like this,
1941 especially when all you're doing is a simple SELECT or INSERT/UPDATE
1942 with no joins.
1943
1944 Though I'm all for a nice home grown solution as well.
1945
1946 Kelmar K. Firesun (Bryce Simonds)
1947 Co-admin: dream.esper.net
1948
1949 Anton Wolkov wrote:
1950 > a nice feature would be a module (like database/exportxml) that would
1951 > have a parameter, how many minutes to wait between an xml export and a
1952 > parameter for target filename, that would eliminate the need for
1953 > crontab.
1954 > also if your into innovation and all, consider implementing sqlite to
1955 > ircservices, it's so much more expandable and would also make services
1956 > fly on select operations.
1957 > the httpd module is not most frequently used mainly because of it's
1958 > stability issues, it may be a good idea to have an export module for
1959 > html pages and then to serve them over apache, this would also provide
1960 > more options to integrate services to existing websites.
1961 > other nice feature i think would be widely used is the vhost parameter
1962 > for nickserv, it is supported by many popular protocols.
1963 > --
1964 > PHANTOm
1965 > http://www.irc.nix.co.il/ -- irc.nix.co.il
1966 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
1967 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
1968 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
1969 >
1970 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu Jan 27 11:05:07 2005
1971 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
1972 Date: Thu Jan 27 11:05:14 2005
1973 Subject: [IRCServices] Database WAS: out of buffer?
1974 In-Reply-To: <41F931CE.9090807@ix.netcom.com>
1975 References: <41f5e06b.06470@achurch.org>
1976 <41F5FDE6.9040402@se.linux.org> <d50f59a0050127075256b29adb@mail.gmail.com>
1977 <41F931CE.9090807@ix.netcom.com>
1978 Message-ID: <41F93B63.1010707@frostycoolslug.com>
1979
1980 As a note, a 'fairly large userbase' would have to be something like
1981 15,000 users.. Our database updates very quickly, and we have over 7,000
1982 nicknames registered.
1983
1984 If you are looking for implementation into a website, we have created
1985 code to do just that, but rather than porting the database to MySQL, we
1986 have created a 'go-between' between the services structs, and a php
1987 script. The pseudoclient opens a socket on 127.0.0.1, and any
1988 connections made to it start with an A token, for example, A NICK
1989 PASSWORD, the service will then query the users struct, return A OK /
1990 FORBIDDEN / INVALID, based on what it finds there :)
1991
1992 Its a simple system, but works well for us :)
1993
1994 This may not be what you use XML exporting for, but a lot of people ask
1995 about using seperate database archetectures(sp) for services, to make it
1996 easier for manipulation from the 'outside', maybe concider coding a
1997 pseudo like we have that makes the task easier :)
1998
1999
2000 /****************************************
2001 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2002 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
2003 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2004 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2005 ****************************************/
2006
2007 Everett B. Simonds wrote:
2008 > I don't really for see the need to embed a whole SQL engine into
2009 > services. I have looked at some of the database code in there and I'm
2010 > wondering if the system would benefit from having some sort of write
2011 > behind log so that services doesn't burn time rewriting the whole
2012 > database every time it flushes them out to disk. This would certainly
2013 > help those who have a significantly sized user base. This would also
2014 > eliminate the need to have two copies of the database on disk while it
2015 > writes it out, good for those who might be strapped for disk space.
2016 >
2017 > If you're going to embed any sort of database option into services, you
2018 > might as well use the Berkeley DB system from Sleepy Cat. No need to
2019 > get fancy with an SQL parser/optimizer for something like this,
2020 > especially when all you're doing is a simple SELECT or INSERT/UPDATE
2021 > with no joins.
2022 >
2023 > Though I'm all for a nice home grown solution as well.
2024 >
2025 > Kelmar K. Firesun (Bryce Simonds)
2026 > Co-admin: dream.esper.net
2027 >
2028 > Anton Wolkov wrote:
2029 >
2030 >> a nice feature would be a module (like database/exportxml) that would
2031 >> have a parameter, how many minutes to wait between an xml export and a
2032 >> parameter for target filename, that would eliminate the need for
2033 >> crontab.
2034 >> also if your into innovation and all, consider implementing sqlite to
2035 >> ircservices, it's so much more expandable and would also make services
2036 >> fly on select operations.
2037 >> the httpd module is not most frequently used mainly because of it's
2038 >> stability issues, it may be a good idea to have an export module for
2039 >> html pages and then to serve them over apache, this would also provide
2040 >> more options to integrate services to existing websites.
2041 >> other nice feature i think would be widely used is the vhost parameter
2042 >> for nickserv, it is supported by many popular protocols.
2043 >> --
2044 >> PHANTOm
2045 >> http://www.irc.nix.co.il/ -- irc.nix.co.il
2046 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2047 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2048 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2049 >>
2050 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2051 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2052 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2053 >
2054 From solutech at dsl.pipex.com Fri Jan 28 09:40:15 2005
2055 From: solutech at dsl.pipex.com (Matt)
2056 Date: Fri Jan 28 09:41:25 2005
2057 Subject: [IRCServices] [Request] Get services to log to a channel
2058 Message-ID: <20050128174117.8EA98E00022F@ranger.systems.pipex.net>
2059
2060 Hi all , I've read through all the docs and cant find out how to make
2061 Ircservices log to a #chan . Is this possible ? . I currently use MagickII
2062 and want to move over to Ircservices as Magick appears to have been
2063 abandoned . Magick has this feature and we find it very useful . If its not
2064 already implemented in Ircservices is there any chance it could be ? .
2065
2066
2067
2068 Regards
2069
2070
2071
2072 Sol
2073
2074 -------------- next part --------------
2075 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2076 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050128/2fa5fdff/attachment.html
2077 From chawmp at cyberarmy.net Fri Jan 28 10:02:52 2005
2078 From: chawmp at cyberarmy.net (Tom McIntyre)
2079 Date: Fri Jan 28 10:01:57 2005
2080 Subject: [IRCServices] [Request] Get services to log to a channel
2081 In-Reply-To: <20050128174117.8EA98E00022F@ranger.systems.pipex.net>
2082 Message-ID: <Zen-1CuaRH-0006S7-7t@rutherford.zen.co.uk>
2083
2084 Hi,
2085
2086 There isn't a way to do this in ircservices, but it's something I patched in
2087 a long time ago for our network. I've attached a patch that might or might
2088 not work against a current version, but you will get the idea if you happen
2089 to be a programmer.
2090
2091 If you do use it, you just need to build cyberarmy/chanlog.so and add
2092 LoadModule cyberarmy/chanlog
2093 to ircservices.conf, and
2094 Module cyberarmy/chanlog
2095 LogTarget "#chan"
2096 EndModule
2097 to modules.conf
2098
2099 HTH :)
2100 --
2101 Chawmp
2102
2103 ________________________________________
2104 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
2105 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf Of Matt
2106 Sent: 28 January 2005 17:40
2107 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
2108 Subject: [IRCServices] [Request] Get services to log to a channel
2109
2110 Hi all , I've read through all the docs and cant find out how to make
2111 Ircservices log to a #chan . Is this possible ? . I currently use MagickII
2112 and want to move over to Ircservices as Magick appears to have been
2113 abandoned . Magick has this feature and we find it very useful . If its not
2114 already implemented in Ircservices is there any chance it could be ? .
2115
2116 Regards
2117
2118 Sol
2119
2120 From chawmp at cyberarmy.net Fri Jan 28 10:07:58 2005
2121 From: chawmp at cyberarmy.net (Tom McIntyre)
2122 Date: Fri Jan 28 10:07:00 2005
2123 Subject: [IRCServices] [Request] Get services to log to a channel
2124 In-Reply-To: <Zen-1CuaRH-0006S7-7t@rutherford.zen.co.uk>
2125 Message-ID: <Zen-1CuaWC-0004Cq-VV@heisenberg.zen.co.uk>
2126
2127 *Duh*, here's one with the patch attached :)
2128 --
2129 Chawmp
2130
2131 -----Original Message-----
2132 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
2133 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf Of Tom McIntyre
2134 Sent: 28 January 2005 18:03
2135 To: 'IRC Services General Mailing List'
2136 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] [Request] Get services to log to a channel
2137
2138 Hi,
2139
2140 There isn't a way to do this in ircservices, but it's something I patched in
2141 a long time ago for our network. I've attached a patch that might or might
2142 not work against a current version, but you will get the idea if you happen
2143 to be a programmer.
2144
2145 If you do use it, you just need to build cyberarmy/chanlog.so and add
2146 LoadModule cyberarmy/chanlog
2147 to ircservices.conf, and
2148 Module cyberarmy/chanlog
2149 LogTarget "#chan"
2150 EndModule
2151 to modules.conf
2152
2153 HTH :)
2154 --
2155 Chawmp
2156
2157 ________________________________________
2158 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
2159 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf Of Matt
2160 Sent: 28 January 2005 17:40
2161 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
2162 Subject: [IRCServices] [Request] Get services to log to a channel
2163
2164 Hi all , I've read through all the docs and cant find out how to make
2165 Ircservices log to a #chan . Is this possible ? . I currently use MagickII
2166 and want to move over to Ircservices as Magick appears to have been
2167 abandoned . Magick has this feature and we find it very useful . If its not
2168 already implemented in Ircservices is there any chance it could be ? .
2169
2170 Regards
2171
2172 Sol
2173
2174 ------------------------------------------------------------------
2175 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2176 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2177 -------------- next part --------------
2178 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
2179 Name: chanlog.patch
2180 Type: application/octet-stream
2181 Size: 5482 bytes
2182 Desc: not available
2183 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050128/65134e2b/chanlog.obj
2184 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Sun Jan 30 07:02:00 2005
2185 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
2186 Date: Sun Jan 30 07:02:43 2005
2187 Subject: [IRCServices] Forbid + reason
2188 Message-ID: <000301c506dc$aab15f90$434405d5@server>
2189
2190 Can be added to ircservices an info line on forbidden nicknames for a reason
2191 or at least the services admin nick who did it?
2192
2193
2194 From andy at shady.org Mon Jan 31 04:26:59 2005
2195 From: andy at shady.org (andy)
2196 Date: Mon Jan 31 04:27:06 2005
2197 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices segfault issue?
2198 Message-ID: <20050131122659.R95796@shady.org>
2199
2200 Hi,
2201
2202 ircservices running on FreeBSD sparc64 Ultra5
2203 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 26 11:05:51 GMT 2005 sparc64
2204
2205 Ircservices is latest build from freebsd ports tree.
2206 5.0.0 patch level 23
2207
2208 IRCD is Unreal3.2.2b running on same machine.
2209
2210
2211 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
2212 0x000000004041790c in strcasecmp () from /lib/libc.so.5
2213 (gdb) bt
2214 #0 0x000000004041790c in strcasecmp () from /lib/libc.so.5
2215 #1 0x000000004057b7d4 in do_receive_message (source=0xffffffffffffe720 <Error reading address 0xffffffffffffe720: Bad address>,
2216 cmd=0xffffffffffffe6e0 <Error reading address 0xffffffffffffe6e0: Bad address>, ac=2, av=0x418140) at unreal.c:857
2217 #2 0x0000000000110cac in call_callback_5 (module=0x238360, id=0, arg1=0xffffffffffffe720, arg2=0xffffffffffffe6e0, arg3=0x2, arg4=0x418140, arg5=0x0)
2218 at modules.c:666
2219 #3 0x00000000001114c0 in process () at process.c:126
2220 #4 0x000000000010cffc in readfirstline_callback (s=0x411c00, param_unused=0x40) at main.c:164
2221 #5 0x00000000001136a8 in check_sockets () at sockets.c:491
2222 #6 0x000000000010d398 in main (ac=2277376, av=0x7fdffffec88, envp=0x7fdffffeca8) at main.c:266
2223
2224
2225 is this fixable ?
2226
2227 cheers
2228
2229 andy
2230 From medice at gmx.at Mon Jan 31 05:02:20 2005
2231 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
2232 Date: Mon Jan 31 05:01:06 2005
2233 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices segfault issue?
2234 In-Reply-To: <20050131122659.R95796@shady.org>
2235 References: <20050131122659.R95796@shady.org>
2236 Message-ID: <41FE2C5C.9030204@gmx.at>
2237
2238 andy wrote:
2239 > Hi,
2240 >
2241 > ircservices running on FreeBSD sparc64 Ultra5
2242 > 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 26 11:05:51 GMT 2005 sparc64
2243 >
2244 > Ircservices is latest build from freebsd ports tree.
2245 > 5.0.0 patch level 23
2246 >
2247
2248 since version 5.0.45 has been released you better try that one first
2249
2250 greetz
2251 Medice
2252 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue Feb 8 11:32:10 2005
2253 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
2254 Date: Tue Feb 8 11:32:24 2005
2255 Subject: [IRCServices] Operserv MODE command & MLOCK
2256 Message-ID: <20050208193210.8721.qmail@web54403.mail.yahoo.com>
2257
2258 ChanServ should NOT enforce mlock when the OperServ
2259 MODE command used on channels.
2260
2261 -ChanServ- Mode lock: +nt-m
2262 * Now talking in #test
2263 * OperServ sets mode: +m-nt
2264 * ChanServ sets mode: +nt-m
2265
2266 I'm waiting for your opinions:-)
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272 =====
2273 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
2274 From togiff at comcast.net Tue Feb 8 21:28:07 2005
2275 From: togiff at comcast.net (Todd)
2276 Date: Tue Feb 8 21:28:49 2005
2277 Subject: [IRCServices] bug with session exceptions?
2278 Message-ID: <000701c50e68$29b43230$7ed7ab43@beautiful>
2279
2280 When the server dies and drops services (making services shut down), it
2281 seems to forget the exception list.
2282
2283 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Feb 10 00:46:25 2005
2284 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
2285 Date: Wed Feb 9 07:47:19 2005
2286 Subject: [IRCServices] bug with session exceptions?
2287 In-Reply-To: <000701c50e68$29b43230$7ed7ab43@beautiful>
2288 Message-ID: <420a3078.12620@achurch.org>
2289
2290 >When the server dies and drops services (making services shut down), it
2291 >seems to forget the exception list.
2292
2293 WFM. Logs?
2294
2295 --Andrew Church
2296 achurch@achurch.org
2297 http://achurch.org/
2298 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Thu Feb 10 09:28:12 2005
2299 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
2300 Date: Thu Feb 10 09:28:24 2005
2301 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2302 Message-ID: <000601c50f95$e7fedaf0$174405d5@server>
2303
2304 I'm using ircservices5.0.44 on unrealircd and if add a channel to the
2305 NickServ AJOIN list (I'm founder on this channel)
2306 and the channel had a key..on status is shown:
2307
2308 #channel unable to join channel (need correct key)
2309
2310 I think nickserv is not sending the svsjoin correct.
2311 I think nickserv is not sending the channel key on the svsjoin command
2312 because:
2313 I tried to svsjoin manually with services raw ( /os raw :nickserv svsjoin
2314 ME #chan ) and it was said "need correct key"
2315
2316 When i tried with the key ( /os raw :nickserv svsjoin ME #chan channelkey )
2317 it joined me to the channel successfully
2318
2319 PS:
2320 Syntax for SVSJOIN on Unreal3.2 is:
2321
2322 SVSJOIN <nick> <channel>[,<channel2>..] [key1[,key2[..]]]
2323
2324 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Feb 11 12:20:34 2005
2325 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
2326 Date: Thu Feb 10 19:21:46 2005
2327 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2328 In-Reply-To: <000601c50f95$e7fedaf0$174405d5@server>
2329 Message-ID: <420c24ad.15574@achurch.org>
2330
2331 >I'm using ircservices5.0.44 on unrealircd and if add a channel to the
2332 >NickServ AJOIN list (I'm founder on this channel)
2333 >and the channel had a key..on status is shown:
2334 >
2335 >#channel unable to join channel (need correct key)
2336
2337 This is designed--and documented!--behavior. RTFM.
2338
2339 --Andrew Church
2340 achurch@achurch.org
2341 http://achurch.org/
2342 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Feb 11 04:03:28 2005
2343 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
2344 Date: Fri Feb 11 04:03:53 2005
2345 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2346 References: <420c24ad.15574@achurch.org>
2347 Message-ID: <000801c51031$b4360c10$724405d5@server>
2348
2349 UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin command
2350 correct.
2351 (svsjoins on +k channels requires the key on the end of the command as i
2352 said on my first email.)
2353
2354 It's documented:
2355 "Note that the IRC server may prohibit you from entering some channels on
2356 the autojoin list, such as channels that have a channel key set (mode +k) "
2357
2358 UnrealIRCD supports and allow the svsjoin; of course if svsjoin sent
2359 correctly on +k channels.
2360
2361 ----- Original Message -----
2362 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
2363 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
2364 Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 5:20 AM
2365 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2366
2367 > >I'm using ircservices5.0.44 on unrealircd and if add a channel to the
2368 >>NickServ AJOIN list (I'm founder on this channel)
2369 >>and the channel had a key..on status is shown:
2370 >>
2371 >>#channel unable to join channel (need correct key)
2372 >
2373 > This is designed--and documented!--behavior. RTFM.
2374 >
2375 > --Andrew Church
2376 > achurch@achurch.org
2377 > http://achurch.org/
2378
2379 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Feb 11 21:31:36 2005
2380 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
2381 Date: Fri Feb 11 04:33:08 2005
2382 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2383 In-Reply-To: <000801c51031$b4360c10$724405d5@server>
2384 Message-ID: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org>
2385
2386 >UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin command
2387 >correct.
2388
2389 So you're suggesting I deliberately circumvent a security measure
2390 someone put in place to prevent arbitrary users from entering their
2391 channel? I don't think so.
2392
2393 End of discussion.
2394
2395 --Andrew Church
2396 achurch@achurch.org
2397 http://achurch.org/
2398 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Feb 11 04:42:58 2005
2399 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
2400 Date: Fri Feb 11 04:43:17 2005
2401 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2402 References: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org>
2403 Message-ID: <002201c51037$38dc1400$724405d5@server>
2404
2405 I've ONLY said that if the command was sent correctly to the ircd it will
2406 work fine.
2407 I've tested it manualy with /os raw.
2408 The problem is that the ircservices does not send the channel key with the
2409 SVSJOIN command when a channel had a key.
2410
2411 The syntax for the command on Unreal when a channel has a key is:
2412 SVSJOIN <nick> <channel> **<channelkey>**
2413
2414 If i'm wrong tell me the correct thing.
2415
2416 From medice at gmx.at Fri Feb 11 04:48:56 2005
2417 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
2418 Date: Fri Feb 11 04:48:33 2005
2419 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2420 In-Reply-To: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org>
2421 References: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org>
2422 Message-ID: <420CA9B8.6030508@gmx.at>
2423
2424 Andrew Church wrote:
2425 >>UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin command
2426 >>correct.
2427 >
2428 >
2429 > So you're suggesting I deliberately circumvent a security measure
2430 > someone put in place to prevent arbitrary users from entering their
2431 > channel? I don't think so.
2432 >
2433 > End of discussion.
2434 >
2435 > --Andrew Church
2436 > achurch@achurch.org
2437 > http://achurch.org/
2438 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2439 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2440 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2441 >
2442 >
2443
2444 "sending svsjoin correct" means you have to include the channel-key - if
2445 the user is able to "/join #channel key" by knowing the key the security
2446 measure is either not enforced against that very user, or useless anyway
2447 (depending on the origin of the key-knowledge)
2448
2449 greets
2450 Medice
2451 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Feb 11 04:56:33 2005
2452 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
2453 Date: Fri Feb 11 04:56:40 2005
2454 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2455 References: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org> <420CA9B8.6030508@gmx.at>
2456 Message-ID: <003201c51039$1ea5a680$724405d5@server>
2457
2458 Medice the INVITE command on unreal overrides the channel key.
2459 So if someone is invited to a +k channel he can join normally ( /join
2460 #lockedchan ) without including the key on the command.
2461 So.. i don't see any reason for someone who have invite access on chanserv
2462 to a channel with +k and he can't join with AJOIN.
2463
2464 Another solution for this problem is to invite users on +k channels as well
2465 as on +i channels.
2466
2467
2468 ----- Original Message -----
2469 From: "Medice" <medice@gmx.at>
2470 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
2471 Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:48 PM
2472 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2473
2474
2475 > Andrew Church wrote:
2476 >>>UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin command
2477 >>>correct.
2478 >>
2479 >>
2480 >> So you're suggesting I deliberately circumvent a security measure
2481 >> someone put in place to prevent arbitrary users from entering their
2482 >> channel? I don't think so.
2483 >>
2484 >> End of discussion.
2485 >>
2486 >> --Andrew Church
2487 >> achurch@achurch.org
2488 >> http://achurch.org/
2489 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2490 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2491 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2492 >>
2493 >>
2494 >
2495 > "sending svsjoin correct" means you have to include the channel-key - if
2496 > the user is able to "/join #channel key" by knowing the key the security
2497 > measure is either not enforced against that very user, or useless anyway
2498 > (depending on the origin of the key-knowledge)
2499 >
2500 > greets
2501 > Medice
2502 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2503 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2504 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2505
2506 From dnb at majestic-liaisons.com Fri Feb 11 05:00:17 2005
2507 From: dnb at majestic-liaisons.com (DeadNotBuried)
2508 Date: Fri Feb 11 05:01:15 2005
2509 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2510 References: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org> <420CA9B8.6030508@gmx.at>
2511 <003201c51039$1ea5a680$724405d5@server>
2512 Message-ID: <000d01c51039$a5840480$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
2513
2514 Normal users have to already be in the channel to be able to Invite someone
2515 in, it's only IRCops that can over ride it from outside the channel.
2516
2517 ----- Original Message -----
2518 From: "Dionisios K." <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
2519 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
2520 Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 11:26 PM
2521 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2522
2523
2524 > Medice the INVITE command on unreal overrides the channel key.
2525 > So if someone is invited to a +k channel he can join normally ( /join
2526 > #lockedchan ) without including the key on the command.
2527 > So.. i don't see any reason for someone who have invite access on chanserv
2528 > to a channel with +k and he can't join with AJOIN.
2529 >
2530 > Another solution for this problem is to invite users on +k channels as
2531 well
2532 > as on +i channels.
2533 >
2534 >
2535 > ----- Original Message -----
2536 > From: "Medice" <medice@gmx.at>
2537 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
2538 <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
2539 > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:48 PM
2540 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2541 >
2542 >
2543 > > Andrew Church wrote:
2544 > >>>UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin command
2545 > >>>correct.
2546 > >>
2547 > >>
2548 > >> So you're suggesting I deliberately circumvent a security measure
2549 > >> someone put in place to prevent arbitrary users from entering their
2550 > >> channel? I don't think so.
2551 > >>
2552 > >> End of discussion.
2553 > >>
2554 > >> --Andrew Church
2555 > >> achurch@achurch.org
2556 > >> http://achurch.org/
2557 > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2558 > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2559 > >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2560 > >>
2561 > >>
2562 > >
2563 > > "sending svsjoin correct" means you have to include the channel-key - if
2564 > > the user is able to "/join #channel key" by knowing the key the security
2565 > > measure is either not enforced against that very user, or useless anyway
2566 > > (depending on the origin of the key-knowledge)
2567 > >
2568 > > greets
2569 > > Medice
2570 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2571 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2572 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2573 >
2574 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2575 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2576 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2577 >
2578 >
2579
2580
2581 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Feb 11 05:06:53 2005
2582 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
2583 Date: Fri Feb 11 05:07:10 2005
2584 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2585 References: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org>
2586 <420CA9B8.6030508@gmx.at><003201c51039$1ea5a680$724405d5@server>
2587 <000d01c51039$a5840480$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
2588 Message-ID: <000401c5103a$901a2fb0$724405d5@server>
2589
2590 I mean the invite by NickServ when you have channels +i on the AJOIN list.
2591
2592 ----- Original Message -----
2593 From: "DeadNotBuried" <dnb@majestic-liaisons.com>
2594 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
2595 Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:00 PM
2596 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2597
2598
2599 > Normal users have to already be in the channel to be able to Invite
2600 > someone
2601 > in, it's only IRCops that can over ride it from outside the channel.
2602 >
2603 > ----- Original Message -----
2604 > From: "Dionisios K." <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
2605 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
2606 > <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
2607 > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 11:26 PM
2608 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2609 >
2610 >
2611 >> Medice the INVITE command on unreal overrides the channel key.
2612 >> So if someone is invited to a +k channel he can join normally ( /join
2613 >> #lockedchan ) without including the key on the command.
2614 >> So.. i don't see any reason for someone who have invite access on
2615 >> chanserv
2616 >> to a channel with +k and he can't join with AJOIN.
2617 >>
2618 >> Another solution for this problem is to invite users on +k channels as
2619 > well
2620 >> as on +i channels.
2621 >>
2622 >>
2623 >> ----- Original Message -----
2624 >> From: "Medice" <medice@gmx.at>
2625 >> To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
2626 > <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
2627 >> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:48 PM
2628 >> Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2629 >>
2630 >>
2631 >> > Andrew Church wrote:
2632 >> >>>UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin
2633 >> >>>command
2634 >> >>>correct.
2635 >> >>
2636 >> >>
2637 >> >> So you're suggesting I deliberately circumvent a security measure
2638 >> >> someone put in place to prevent arbitrary users from entering their
2639 >> >> channel? I don't think so.
2640 >> >>
2641 >> >> End of discussion.
2642 >> >>
2643 >> >> --Andrew Church
2644 >> >> achurch@achurch.org
2645 >> >> http://achurch.org/
2646 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2647 >> >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2648 >> >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2649 >> >>
2650 >> >>
2651 >> >
2652 >> > "sending svsjoin correct" means you have to include the channel-key -
2653 >> > if
2654 >> > the user is able to "/join #channel key" by knowing the key the
2655 >> > security
2656 >> > measure is either not enforced against that very user, or useless
2657 >> > anyway
2658 >> > (depending on the origin of the key-knowledge)
2659 >> >
2660 >> > greets
2661 >> > Medice
2662 >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2663 >> > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2664 >> > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2665 >>
2666 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2667 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2668 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2669 >>
2670 >>
2671 >
2672 >
2673 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2674 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2675 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2676
2677 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Feb 11 09:34:21 2005
2678 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
2679 Date: Fri Feb 11 09:34:31 2005
2680 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2681 In-Reply-To: <420CA9B8.6030508@gmx.at>
2682 References: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org> <420CA9B8.6030508@gmx.at>
2683 Message-ID: <420CEC9D.3040105@frostycoolslug.com>
2684
2685 Personally, i'd say "End of Discussion" meant just that. I'd personally
2686 also be insulted by someone screaming 'BUG' at designed behaviour,
2687 ESPECIALLY if its documented to be so. IMO, saying something is a bug,
2688 indicates the developer did something wrong, And hey, we all have our
2689 pride, and Andy has every right to be proud at services :p
2690
2691 anyway, back to the topic.
2692
2693 I agree with Andy here, if its that much of an issue, get your IRC
2694 client to do it, or go modify the ajoin module to do it.
2695
2696 /****************************************
2697 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2698 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
2699 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2700 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2701 ****************************************/
2702
2703 Medice wrote:
2704 > Andrew Church wrote:
2705 >
2706 >>> UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin
2707 >>> command correct.
2708 >>
2709 >>
2710 >>
2711 >> So you're suggesting I deliberately circumvent a security measure
2712 >> someone put in place to prevent arbitrary users from entering their
2713 >> channel? I don't think so.
2714 >>
2715 >> End of discussion.
2716 >>
2717 >> --Andrew Church
2718 >> achurch@achurch.org
2719 >> http://achurch.org/
2720 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2721 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2722 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2723 >>
2724 >>
2725 >
2726 > "sending svsjoin correct" means you have to include the channel-key - if
2727 > the user is able to "/join #channel key" by knowing the key the security
2728 > measure is either not enforced against that very user, or useless anyway
2729 > (depending on the origin of the key-knowledge)
2730 >
2731 > greets
2732 > Medice
2733 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2734 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2735 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2736 >
2737 From nick.martini at gmail.com Fri Feb 11 10:25:57 2005
2738 From: nick.martini at gmail.com (nick martini)
2739 Date: Fri Feb 11 10:26:24 2005
2740 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ AJOIN BUG?
2741 In-Reply-To: <420CEC9D.3040105@frostycoolslug.com>
2742 References: <420ca5fd.16156@achurch.org> <420CA9B8.6030508@gmx.at>
2743 <420CEC9D.3040105@frostycoolslug.com>
2744 Message-ID: <ee1a43f4050211102524e75642@mail.gmail.com>
2745
2746 jesus christ, shut up all of you.
2747
2748
2749 On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:34:21 +0000, Craig McLure
2750 <Craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
2751 > Personally, i'd say "End of Discussion" meant just that. I'd personally
2752 > also be insulted by someone screaming 'BUG' at designed behaviour,
2753 > ESPECIALLY if its documented to be so. IMO, saying something is a bug,
2754 > indicates the developer did something wrong, And hey, we all have our
2755 > pride, and Andy has every right to be proud at services :p
2756 >
2757 > anyway, back to the topic.
2758 >
2759 > I agree with Andy here, if its that much of an issue, get your IRC
2760 > client to do it, or go modify the ajoin module to do it.
2761 >
2762 > /****************************************
2763 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2764 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
2765 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2766 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2767 > ****************************************/
2768 >
2769 > Medice wrote:
2770 > > Andrew Church wrote:
2771 > >
2772 > >>> UnrealIRCD allows you to join to +k channel if you send svsjoin
2773 > >>> command correct.
2774 > >>
2775 > >>
2776 > >>
2777 > >> So you're suggesting I deliberately circumvent a security measure
2778 > >> someone put in place to prevent arbitrary users from entering their
2779 > >> channel? I don't think so.
2780 > >>
2781 > >> End of discussion.
2782 > >>
2783 > >> --Andrew Church
2784 > >> achurch@achurch.org
2785 > >> http://achurch.org/
2786 > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
2787 > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2788 > >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2789 > >>
2790 > >>
2791 > >
2792 > > "sending svsjoin correct" means you have to include the channel-key - if
2793 > > the user is able to "/join #channel key" by knowing the key the security
2794 > > measure is either not enforced against that very user, or useless anyway
2795 > > (depending on the origin of the key-knowledge)
2796 > >
2797 > > greets
2798 > > Medice
2799 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2800 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2801 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2802 > >
2803 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2804 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2805 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2806 >
2807 From blackspy2002 at mail.ru Sat Feb 12 05:41:30 2005
2808 From: blackspy2002 at mail.ru (BlackCat)
2809 Date: Sat Feb 12 05:41:25 2005
2810 Subject: [IRCServices] Address Already in use
2811 Message-ID: <001301c51108$9d580890$54931bd9@blackcat>
2812
2813 Hello, im using latest version of ircservices compiled from freebsd ports
2814 tree, i already edited my configuration as i read in manual, but i got some
2815 problems, i see the following lines in logs:
2816 2005] FATAL: Can't connect to server (war-ir.net:6690): Connection refused
2817 2005] IRC Services 5.0.23 starting up
2818 2005] FATAL: Can't connect to server (war-ir.net:12000): Address already in
2819 use
2820 2005] IRC Services 5.0.23 starting up
2821 2005] FATAL: Can't connect to server (war-ir.net:6667): Address already in
2822 use
2823 command: quit
2824
2825 Can you tell me please what is my problem and what additional information do
2826 you need if you wish to help, im using latest UnrealIRCD, thank you
2827
2828 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Feb 12 09:41:23 2005
2829 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
2830 Date: Sat Feb 12 09:41:16 2005
2831 Subject: [IRCServices] Address Already in use
2832 In-Reply-To: <001301c51108$9d580890$54931bd9@blackcat>
2833 References: <001301c51108$9d580890$54931bd9@blackcat>
2834 Message-ID: <420E3FC3.1070607@frostycoolslug.com>
2835
2836 Firstly, the FreeBSD Ports version of services is outta date, i'd
2837 recommend downloading the latest version from the services website
2838 (http://www.ircservices.esper.net), and ensure you give your services
2839 server a different name from the main server, eg services.war-ir.net
2840
2841 should sort your probs
2842 /****************************************
2843 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
2844 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
2845 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
2846 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
2847 ****************************************/
2848
2849 BlackCat wrote:
2850 > Hello, im using latest version of ircservices compiled from freebsd ports
2851 > tree, i already edited my configuration as i read in manual, but i got some
2852 > problems, i see the following lines in logs:
2853 > 2005] FATAL: Can't connect to server (war-ir.net:6690): Connection refused
2854 > 2005] IRC Services 5.0.23 starting up
2855 > 2005] FATAL: Can't connect to server (war-ir.net:12000): Address already in
2856 > use
2857 > 2005] IRC Services 5.0.23 starting up
2858 > 2005] FATAL: Can't connect to server (war-ir.net:6667): Address already in
2859 > use
2860 > command: quit
2861 >
2862 > Can you tell me please what is my problem and what additional information do
2863 > you need if you wish to help, im using latest UnrealIRCD, thank you
2864 >
2865 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
2866 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2867 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2868 >
2869 From jerome at gmanmi.tv Wed Feb 16 19:31:48 2005
2870 From: jerome at gmanmi.tv (JM)
2871 Date: Wed Feb 16 19:32:13 2005
2872 Subject: [IRCServices] Error on IRC services
2873 Message-ID: <200502171131.48969.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
2874
2875 i got this error from ircservice..
2876
2877 -- conenct block from ircd.conf - bahamut
2878 connect {
2879 // required tokens
2880 name services.test.com; # Other server's name
2881 host 192.168.0.7; # Other server's host
2882 apasswd secret; # Password to accept from other server
2883 cpasswd secret; # Password to send to other server
2884
2885 // optional tokens
2886 // port 7000; # Port to autoconnect to other server on
2887 // bind 127.0.0.1; # IP to connect from
2888 // flags ZEH; # Flags for this link
2889 // class servers; # Connection class to use for this link
2890 };
2891
2892 [Feb 17 11:05:55.785722 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname...
2893 [Feb 17 11:05:55.785945 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** Found your hostname, cached
2894 [Feb 17 11:05:55.786161 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** Checking Ident
2895 [Feb 17 11:05:55.786377 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** No Ident response
2896 [Feb 17 11:05:55.786591 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com 451 PING :Register first.
2897 [Feb 17 11:05:55.786806 2005] unknown message from server (:irc.test.com 451 PING :Register first.)
2898 [Feb 17 11:05:55.822143 2005] debug: Received: ERROR :Closing Link: 0.0.0.0 (No Connect block)
2899 [Feb 17 11:05:55.822571 2005] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing Link: 0.0.0.0 (No Connect block))
2900 [Feb 17 11:05:55.822896 2005] debug: sockets: read(4): Connection reset by peer
2901
2902 TIA,
2903
2904 From admin at vco.se Wed Feb 16 19:41:52 2005
2905 From: admin at vco.se (David M)
2906 Date: Wed Feb 16 19:42:06 2005
2907 Subject: [IRCServices] Can't even get it to build on OSX 10.3.8
2908 Message-ID: <42141280.3090100@vco.se>
2909
2910 Pfft couldn't build due to needing updated GCC etc :P
2911
2912 Sorry but i refuse to be pampering programs that can't be uniform standard.
2913
2914 If it can't work with whats rolled out thats pretty sad.
2915
2916 Virtually everything else including dopey anope which can't even stand
2917 on it's own two feet proper
2918 was able to at least install whats makes thing thing so royal and bold
2919 that i should go updating bloody GCC.
2920
2921 Theres been no need to till this thing whinged.
2922
2923 NEXT!
2924 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Feb 17 13:13:32 2005
2925 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
2926 Date: Wed Feb 16 20:16:40 2005
2927 Subject: [IRCServices] Can't even get it to build on OSX 10.3.8
2928 In-Reply-To: <42141280.3090100@vco.se>
2929 Message-ID: <42141aa1.46310@achurch.org>
2930
2931 You're quite welcome to continue using an outdated, buggy version of
2932 GCC which doesn't support modern standards if that's your desire. On the
2933 other hand, I have no desire to help people who not only insist on living
2934 in the past, but can't even read the Services manual, which clearly states
2935 the reasons why a newer version of GCC is required.
2936
2937 Next!
2938
2939 --Andrew Church
2940 achurch@achurch.org
2941 http://achurch.org/
2942
2943 >Pfft couldn't build due to needing updated GCC etc :P
2944 >
2945 >Sorry but i refuse to be pampering programs that can't be uniform standard.
2946 >
2947 >If it can't work with whats rolled out thats pretty sad.
2948 >
2949 >Virtually everything else including dopey anope which can't even stand
2950 >on it's own two feet proper
2951 >was able to at least install whats makes thing thing so royal and bold
2952 >that i should go updating bloody GCC.
2953 >
2954 >Theres been no need to till this thing whinged.
2955 >
2956 >NEXT!
2957 >------------------------------------------------------------------
2958 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
2959 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
2960 From jerome at gmanmi.tv Wed Feb 16 21:40:56 2005
2961 From: jerome at gmanmi.tv (JM)
2962 Date: Wed Feb 16 21:41:06 2005
2963 Subject: [IRCServices] definitions of this...
2964 Message-ID: <200502171340.56583.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
2965
2966 hi,
2967
2968 where can i find the definitions of list below.. cant find it on the doc for
2969 5.0.xx
2970
2971 CSDefKeepTopic
2972 #CSDefSecureOps
2973 #CSDefPrivate
2974 #CSDefTopicLock
2975 #CSDefLeaveOps
2976 CSDefSecure
2977 #CSDefOpNotice
2978 #CSDefEnforce
2979 #CSDefHideEmail
2980 #CSDefHideTopic
2981 #CSDefHideMlock
2982
2983 TIA,
2984
2985 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Feb 17 15:29:04 2005
2986 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
2987 Date: Wed Feb 16 22:29:28 2005
2988 Subject: [IRCServices] definitions of this...
2989 In-Reply-To: <200502171340.56583.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
2990 Message-ID: <421439c3.56507@achurch.org>
2991
2992 Appendix A, chanserv/main
2993
2994 --Andrew Church
2995 achurch@achurch.org
2996 http://achurch.org/
2997
2998 >hi,
2999 >
3000 > where can i find the definitions of list below.. cant find it on the doc for
3001 >5.0.xx
3002 >
3003 > CSDefKeepTopic
3004 > #CSDefSecureOps
3005 > #CSDefPrivate
3006 > #CSDefTopicLock
3007 > #CSDefLeaveOps
3008 > CSDefSecure
3009 > #CSDefOpNotice
3010 > #CSDefEnforce
3011 > #CSDefHideEmail
3012 > #CSDefHideTopic
3013 > #CSDefHideMlock
3014 >
3015 >TIA,
3016 >
3017 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3018 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3019 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3020 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Feb 16 22:44:21 2005
3021 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
3022 Date: Wed Feb 16 22:44:34 2005
3023 Subject: [IRCServices] Error on IRC services
3024 In-Reply-To: <200502171131.48969.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
3025 References: <200502171131.48969.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
3026 Message-ID: <42143D45.7030401@frostycoolslug.com>
3027
3028 Seeing as you appear to be doing the connection internally, try binding
3029 Services socket to 192.168.0.7 Also, check the port you are connecting
3030 services too is a server port. I'm not sure how bahamut works, but it
3031 looks like services is trying to connect to a client port there (I could
3032 be wrong)
3033
3034 Obviously, make sure you've modified your ircservices.conf to match the
3035 connect{} block, and rehashed your IRCd to allow the server to connect.
3036
3037 The info given was kinda cryptic, so i'm just throwing out a few
3038 possible problems. If you have any more info to give, feel free to reply.
3039
3040 Thanks
3041
3042 /****************************************
3043 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3044 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
3045 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3046 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3047 ****************************************/
3048
3049 JM wrote:
3050 > i got this error from ircservice..
3051 >
3052 > -- conenct block from ircd.conf - bahamut
3053 > connect {
3054 > // required tokens
3055 > name services.test.com; # Other server's name
3056 > host 192.168.0.7; # Other server's host
3057 > apasswd secret; # Password to accept from other server
3058 > cpasswd secret; # Password to send to other server
3059 >
3060 > // optional tokens
3061 > // port 7000; # Port to autoconnect to other server on
3062 > // bind 127.0.0.1; # IP to connect from
3063 > // flags ZEH; # Flags for this link
3064 > // class servers; # Connection class to use for this link
3065 > };
3066 >
3067 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.785722 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname...
3068 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.785945 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** Found your hostname, cached
3069 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.786161 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** Checking Ident
3070 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.786377 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com NOTICE AUTH :*** No Ident response
3071 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.786591 2005] debug: Received: :irc.test.com 451 PING :Register first.
3072 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.786806 2005] unknown message from server (:irc.test.com 451 PING :Register first.)
3073 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.822143 2005] debug: Received: ERROR :Closing Link: 0.0.0.0 (No Connect block)
3074 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.822571 2005] unknown message from server (ERROR :Closing Link: 0.0.0.0 (No Connect block))
3075 > [Feb 17 11:05:55.822896 2005] debug: sockets: read(4): Connection reset by peer
3076 >
3077 > TIA,
3078 >
3079 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3080 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3081 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3082 >
3083 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Feb 16 22:56:52 2005
3084 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
3085 Date: Wed Feb 16 22:57:05 2005
3086 Subject: [IRCServices] Can't even get it to build on OSX 10.3.8
3087 In-Reply-To: <42141280.3090100@vco.se>
3088 References: <42141280.3090100@vco.se>
3089 Message-ID: <42144034.5090803@frostycoolslug.com>
3090
3091 Doesn't build?
3092 Don't wanna upgrade to something which supports modern standard?
3093 Wanna live in the past?
3094
3095 Feel free. But i dont see how bitching to this list is gonna help you.
3096 Its not going to be changed, and i'm sure you know that too damn well,
3097 all your e-mail is gonna do is piss people off. You like doing that?
3098
3099 So, from where i'm standing you have a choice:
3100
3101 a) Update GCC, and get IRCServices compiling
3102 b) Don't, and use anope.
3103
3104 Its not even like updating a compiler is a life changing job, but you
3105 make it seem like it will be the end of the world if you do, but either
3106 way..
3107
3108 ITS NOT OUR PROBLEM.
3109
3110
3111 ps. My appologies to Andy and everyone else on this list if you have
3112 been insulted in anyway. This had to be said. And just a reminder, if
3113 you dont have anything constructive to say.. dont say it ;)
3114
3115 /****************************************
3116 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3117 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
3118 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3119 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3120 ****************************************/
3121
3122 David M wrote:
3123 > Pfft couldn't build due to needing updated GCC etc :P
3124 >
3125 > Sorry but i refuse to be pampering programs that can't be uniform standard.
3126 >
3127 > If it can't work with whats rolled out thats pretty sad.
3128 >
3129 > Virtually everything else including dopey anope which can't even stand
3130 > on it's own two feet proper
3131 > was able to at least install whats makes thing thing so royal and bold
3132 > that i should go updating bloody GCC.
3133 >
3134 > Theres been no need to till this thing whinged.
3135 >
3136 > NEXT!
3137 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3138 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3139 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3140 >
3141 From quension at mac.com Wed Feb 16 23:38:22 2005
3142 From: quension at mac.com (Trevor Talbot)
3143 Date: Wed Feb 16 23:38:38 2005
3144 Subject: [IRCServices] Can't even get it to build on OSX 10.3.8
3145 In-Reply-To: <42144034.5090803@frostycoolslug.com>
3146 Message-ID: <E69814E3-80B6-11D9-80A4-0003938D6866@mac.com>
3147
3148 On Wednesday, Feb 16, 2005, at 22:56 US/Pacific, Craig McLure wrote:
3149
3150 > Its not even like updating a compiler is a life changing job, but you
3151 > make it seem like it will be the end of the world if you do, but
3152 > either way..
3153
3154 Updating gcc on OS X is not something you do lightly; Apple maintains a
3155 modified version of the toolchain, and there are ABI compatibility
3156 issues.
3157
3158 On the other hand, 10.3 should already be using gcc 3.3/3.4, so unless
3159 he's coming from an older install and didn't run gcc_select,
3160 something's odd...
3161
3162 -- Quension
3163
3164 From admin at vco.se Thu Feb 17 02:41:33 2005
3165 From: admin at vco.se (David M)
3166 Date: Thu Feb 17 02:41:44 2005
3167 Subject: [IRCServices] Can't even get it to build on OSX 10.3.8
3168 In-Reply-To: <E69814E3-80B6-11D9-80A4-0003938D6866@mac.com>
3169 References: <E69814E3-80B6-11D9-80A4-0003938D6866@mac.com>
3170 Message-ID: <421474DD.8000201@vco.se>
3171
3172 Thankyou at last someone realises what i'm on about.
3173
3174 Updating GCC is not recomended SOP and by the sounds of it
3175 i'm pretty current anyway.
3176
3177 Therefore i'll take the great advice and reserve any further comment
3178 as it's allready been said for me.
3179
3180 Because much like the Crew at Anope the same attitude has been reflected.
3181
3182 Moral of story if you want the job done properly your better of coding
3183 it yourself.
3184
3185 Goodbye and best wishes for the future.
3186
3187
3188
3189 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Feb 17 20:34:31 2005
3190 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3191 Date: Thu Feb 17 03:39:01 2005
3192 Subject: [IRCServices] Can't even get it to build on OSX 10.3.8
3193 In-Reply-To: <421474DD.8000201@vco.se>
3194 Message-ID: <42148251.07443@achurch.org>
3195
3196 [CC'd privately as you suggest you will/have unsubscribed; apologies if you
3197 get the message in duplicate]
3198
3199 >Updating GCC is not recomended SOP and by the sounds of it
3200 >i'm pretty current anyway.
3201
3202 If you do have at least GCC 3.2, then it's likely you've run into a
3203 bug in the configure script. I'm by no means perfect (though I do take
3204 offense at insults hurled out of nowhere!), and I don't have a Mac to test
3205 on, so any information to help fix such problems is of course appreciated.
3206 For starters, assuming the problem occurs while running ./configure, it
3207 would help to have:
3208 - the output from ./configure
3209 - the output from gcc -v
3210 - the contents of configure.log
3211
3212 --Andrew Church
3213 achurch@achurch.org
3214 http://achurch.org/
3215 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Feb 17 22:40:24 2005
3216 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3217 Date: Thu Feb 17 05:48:49 2005
3218 Subject: Thoughts on Services development (was Re: [IRCServices] Can't even
3219 get it to build on OSX 10.3.8)
3220 Message-ID: <4214a0b9.07746@achurch.org>
3221
3222 [This is a copy of the message I sent to David M in response to his private
3223 message to me. I will not post that message, as doing so would violate
3224 etiquette, but I feel it important to make my thoughts on Services
3225 development known, for the benefit of others who may have similar
3226 concerns. I have elided portions of my message irrelevant to that topic.]
3227
3228 [...] From my viewpoint (subjective, certainly, but everyone's
3229 viewpoint is subjective by definition), you have accused me of carelessness
3230 without taking the time to fully understand the issues involved. Despite
3231 the fact that IRC Services is merely a free-time project of mine, I have
3232 taken considerable care to ensure that it is compliant with modern
3233 standards, as described in section 2-1 of the manual, and I try to ensure
3234 that it will compile and run on commonly used operating systems. However,
3235 I lack both the time and the resources to check its behavior in all
3236 environments--in fact, all I have at my disposal is one computer which can
3237 run either Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, or Windows. As a result, I have to
3238 rely on reports from users to resolve any problems on other systems.
3239
3240 I had hoped my previous message had demonstrated that I was quite
3241 willing to admit my error, but it regrettably seems that that is not the
3242 case. Nonetheless, I am still open to receiving any information you wish
3243 to provide regarding your problem.
3244
3245 It is true that I have deliberately removed support for older
3246 compilation tools from IRC Services, and I will continue to do so in the
3247 future as those tools evolve. However, this is not due to carelessness; on
3248 the contrary, it is the result of efforts to clean up the source code and
3249 bring it in line with a single standard. As I mentioned earlier, Services
3250 is only a free-time project of mine, and I simply cannot spare the effort
3251 to support multiple versions of development tools. If perhaps I am
3252 adopting new standards faster than commercial OS vendors do, it is
3253 certainly not out of malice or spite, but as I am distributing this program
3254 (which is the result of nearly nine years of work--perhaps you are not
3255 aware, but Anope itself is a second-generation derivative of IRC Services
3256 4.3) free of monetary charge, I do feel entitled to ask that users of the
3257 program make some effort of their own in order to use it.
3258
3259 [...]
3260
3261 --Andrew Church
3262 achurch@achurch.org
3263 http://achurch.org/
3264 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu Feb 17 06:26:20 2005
3265 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
3266 Date: Thu Feb 17 06:26:48 2005
3267 Subject: Thoughts on Services development (was Re: [IRCServices] Can't
3268 even get it to build on OSX 10.3.8)
3269 In-Reply-To: <4214a0b9.07746@achurch.org>
3270 References: <4214a0b9.07746@achurch.org>
3271 Message-ID: <4214A98C.1080209@frostycoolslug.com>
3272
3273 Thanks for the copy of this, sorry if i over reacted on the list
3274 earlier, it just gets frustrating sometimes, he wasnt willing to post
3275 anything interesting, except 'Screw you all, it doesnt work, you all
3276 suck' (Not quite like that, but that was the general idea). I promised
3277 to take a 'back seat' with regards to services, but with that mail, i
3278 felt i had to speak out. Sorry again.
3279
3280 /****************************************
3281 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3282 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
3283 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3284 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3285 ****************************************/
3286
3287 Andrew Church wrote:
3288 > [This is a copy of the message I sent to David M in response to his private
3289 > message to me. I will not post that message, as doing so would violate
3290 > etiquette, but I feel it important to make my thoughts on Services
3291 > development known, for the benefit of others who may have similar
3292 > concerns. I have elided portions of my message irrelevant to that topic.]
3293 >
3294 > [...] From my viewpoint (subjective, certainly, but everyone's
3295 > viewpoint is subjective by definition), you have accused me of carelessness
3296 > without taking the time to fully understand the issues involved. Despite
3297 > the fact that IRC Services is merely a free-time project of mine, I have
3298 > taken considerable care to ensure that it is compliant with modern
3299 > standards, as described in section 2-1 of the manual, and I try to ensure
3300 > that it will compile and run on commonly used operating systems. However,
3301 > I lack both the time and the resources to check its behavior in all
3302 > environments--in fact, all I have at my disposal is one computer which can
3303 > run either Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, or Windows. As a result, I have to
3304 > rely on reports from users to resolve any problems on other systems.
3305 >
3306 > I had hoped my previous message had demonstrated that I was quite
3307 > willing to admit my error, but it regrettably seems that that is not the
3308 > case. Nonetheless, I am still open to receiving any information you wish
3309 > to provide regarding your problem.
3310 >
3311 > It is true that I have deliberately removed support for older
3312 > compilation tools from IRC Services, and I will continue to do so in the
3313 > future as those tools evolve. However, this is not due to carelessness; on
3314 > the contrary, it is the result of efforts to clean up the source code and
3315 > bring it in line with a single standard. As I mentioned earlier, Services
3316 > is only a free-time project of mine, and I simply cannot spare the effort
3317 > to support multiple versions of development tools. If perhaps I am
3318 > adopting new standards faster than commercial OS vendors do, it is
3319 > certainly not out of malice or spite, but as I am distributing this program
3320 > (which is the result of nearly nine years of work--perhaps you are not
3321 > aware, but Anope itself is a second-generation derivative of IRC Services
3322 > 4.3) free of monetary charge, I do feel entitled to ask that users of the
3323 > program make some effort of their own in order to use it.
3324 >
3325 > [...]
3326 >
3327 > --Andrew Church
3328 > achurch@achurch.org
3329 > http://achurch.org/
3330 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3331 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3332 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3333 >
3334 From admin at epicirc.net Thu Feb 17 22:20:06 2005
3335 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
3336 Date: Thu Feb 17 22:20:34 2005
3337 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
3338 Message-ID: <200502180620.j1I6K6pZ084546@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
3339
3340 Hello... I have noticed a little error, and I just wanted to post here to
3341 see if anyone had already posted regarding it, or if it was the first time.
3342
3343 I run an IRC Network with Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.41
3344
3345 When I send a global notice that is fairly long it appears that the
3346 character ":" shows up in the notice. If I were to just sent a global
3347 notice as an oper, Unreal would cut the message off before the ":" would
3348 appear, so this only occurs with services.
3349
3350 I have noticed it in Channel Join Notices, Network Connect Notices, and
3351 Global Notices. Below is an example:
3352
3353 -------------------------- Sending the notice with OperServ global
3354 -------------------------
3355
3356 [11:30pm] -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a
3357 major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive
3358 actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the
3359 network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers
3360 running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please
3361 join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
3362
3363 ------------------------ Sending the same notice as an oper, and not with
3364 services -----------------------
3365
3366 [11:32pm] -XanaX- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major
3367 increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions
3368 to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the network.
3369 If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running a
3370 scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help
3371 and spe
3372
3373 ----------------------------------
3374
3375 As you can see, Unreal cuts the message off when I send it as an oper. It
3376 doesnt get past the word "speak". But if you notice in the notice sent my
3377 Services, there is "Opers running :a scan to detect". The : is definatly
3378 not in my notice.
3379
3380 Any help or assistance regarding this would be great. Just thought it
3381 should be noted for any future releases.
3382
3383 Thank you for your hard work & development of open-sourced software.
3384
3385 XanaX
3386 irc.epicirc.net
3387
3388 -------------- next part --------------
3389 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
3390 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050218/8785de02/attachment.html
3391 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Feb 18 16:48:29 2005
3392 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3393 Date: Thu Feb 17 23:49:11 2005
3394 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
3395 In-Reply-To: <200502180620.j1I6K6pZ084546@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
3396 Message-ID: <42159df0.13733@achurch.org>
3397
3398 This is believed to be an mIRC bug. Try with another client.
3399
3400 --Andrew Church
3401 achurch@achurch.org
3402 http://achurch.org/
3403
3404 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
3405 >
3406 >--===============1706752752==
3407 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
3408 > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70"
3409 >
3410 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
3411 >
3412 >------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70
3413 >Content-Type: text/plain;
3414 > charset="us-ascii"
3415 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
3416 >
3417 >Hello... I have noticed a little error, and I just wanted to post here to
3418 >see if anyone had already posted regarding it, or if it was the first time.
3419 >
3420 >I run an IRC Network with Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.41
3421 >
3422 >When I send a global notice that is fairly long it appears that the
3423 >character ":" shows up in the notice. If I were to just sent a global
3424 >notice as an oper, Unreal would cut the message off before the ":" would
3425 >appear, so this only occurs with services.
3426 >
3427 >I have noticed it in Channel Join Notices, Network Connect Notices, and
3428 >Global Notices. Below is an example:
3429 >
3430 >-------------------------- Sending the notice with OperServ global
3431 >-------------------------
3432 >
3433 >[11:30pm] -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a
3434 >major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive
3435 >actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the
3436 >network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers
3437 >running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please
3438 >join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
3439 >
3440 >------------------------ Sending the same notice as an oper, and not with
3441 >services -----------------------
3442 >
3443 >[11:32pm] -XanaX- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major
3444 >increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions
3445 >to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the network.
3446 >If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running a
3447 >scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help
3448 >and spe
3449 >
3450 >----------------------------------
3451 >
3452 >As you can see, Unreal cuts the message off when I send it as an oper. It
3453 >doesnt get past the word "speak". But if you notice in the notice sent my
3454 >Services, there is "Opers running :a scan to detect". The : is definatly
3455 >not in my notice.
3456 >
3457 >Any help or assistance regarding this would be great. Just thought it
3458 >should be noted for any future releases.
3459 >
3460 >Thank you for your hard work & development of open-sourced software.
3461 >
3462 >XanaX
3463 >irc.epicirc.net
3464 >
3465 >
3466 >------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70
3467 >Content-Type: text/html;
3468 > charset="us-ascii"
3469 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
3470 >
3471 ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
3472 ><HTML><HEAD>
3473 ><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
3474 >charset=3Dus-ascii">
3475 ><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
3476 ><BODY>
3477 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial =
3478 >size=3D2>Hello... I have=20
3479 >noticed a little error, and I just wanted to post here to see if anyone =
3480 >had=20
3481 >already posted regarding it, or if it was the first =
3482 >time.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3483 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3484 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3485 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I run =
3486 >an IRC Network=20
3487 >with Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.41</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3488 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3489 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3490 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>When I =
3491 >send a global=20
3492 >notice that is fairly long it appears that the character ":" shows up in =
3493 >the=20
3494 >notice.&nbsp; If I were to just sent a global notice as an oper, Unreal =
3495 >would=20
3496 >cut the message off before the ":" would appear, so this only occurs =
3497 >with=20
3498 >services.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3499 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3500 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3501 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have =
3502 >noticed it in=20
3503 >Channel Join Notices, Network Connect Notices, and Global Notices.&nbsp; =
3504 >Below=20
3505 >is an example:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3506 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3507 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3508 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3509 >size=3D2>-------------------------- Sending the notice with OperServ =
3510 >global=20
3511 >-------------------------</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3512 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3513 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3514 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial =
3515 >size=3D2>[11:30pm] -Global-=20
3516 >[Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major increase of=20
3517 >unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions to make =
3518 >sure=20
3519 >that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you =
3520 >receive a=20
3521 >CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect =
3522 >
3523 >malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak =
3524 >to an=20
3525 >Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3526 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3527 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3528 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3529 >size=3D2>------------------------ Sending the same notice as an oper, =
3530 >and not with=20
3531 >services -----------------------</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3532 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3533 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3534 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial =
3535 >size=3D2>[11:32pm] -XanaX-=20
3536 >[Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major increase of=20
3537 >unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions to make =
3538 >sure=20
3539 >that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you =
3540 >receive a=20
3541 >CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running a scan to detect=20
3542 >malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help and=20
3543 >spe</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3544 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3545 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3546 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3547 >size=3D2>----------------------------------</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3548 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3549 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3550 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As you =
3551 >can see,=20
3552 >Unreal cuts the message off when I send it as an oper.&nbsp; It doesnt =
3553 >get past=20
3554 >the word "speak".&nbsp; But if you notice in the notice sent my =
3555 >Services, there=20
3556 >is "Opers running :a scan to detect".&nbsp; The : is definatly not in my =
3557 >
3558 >notice.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3559 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3560 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3561 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Any =
3562 >help or=20
3563 >assistance regarding this would be great.&nbsp; Just thought it should =
3564 >be noted=20
3565 >for any future releases.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3566 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3567 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3568 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank =
3569 >you for your=20
3570 >hard work &amp; development of open-sourced =
3571 >software.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3572 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3573 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3574 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3575 >size=3D2>XanaX</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3576 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3577 >size=3D2>irc.epicirc.net</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3578 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3579 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
3580 >
3581 >------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70--
3582 >
3583 >
3584 >
3585 >--===============1706752752==
3586 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
3587 >MIME-Version: 1.0
3588 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
3589 >Content-Disposition: inline
3590 >
3591 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3592 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3593 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3594 >--===============1706752752==--
3595 >
3596 >
3597 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Fri Feb 18 04:29:33 2005
3598 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
3599 Date: Fri Feb 18 04:29:48 2005
3600 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
3601 Message-ID: <2b950dd2b9438e.2b9438e2b950dd@shaw.ca>
3602
3603 using /msg chanserv unban #channel doesn't remove every possible mask for your account? So it's pretty useless for example if a user used ?'s as character replacements. I am just re-writing a ban protection script and have fixed that issue simply replacing my match ?'s with *'s. I realise this may not be 100% but mIRC doesn't check ?'s in it's iswm match... So it's either immence cpu to calculate the formula with each character for every ? Or replace with a *.
3604
3605 Anyway IRC Services should unban anything relevent to your account. The IP address which can be grabbed from the server? The current vhost for oper/NeoStats etc which would be in use? The original hostname from connect i.e. ip.yourisp.net which must be available because it's in whois information?
3606
3607 I think at current it's not fully working.
3608
3609 Regards,
3610
3611 Jason Mainwaring
3612 A+ Service Technician
3613 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
3614 MCSA Messaging
3615 Certified Novell Administrator
3616 Phone: (02) 9908 4244
3617 Mobile: 0413 161 708
3618 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
3619
3620 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Feb 18 22:54:32 2005
3621 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3622 Date: Fri Feb 18 05:55:18 2005
3623 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
3624 In-Reply-To: <2b950dd2b9438e.2b9438e2b950dd@shaw.ca>
3625 Message-ID: <4215f3be.31054@achurch.org>
3626
3627 ChanServ already checks all of these. If you find an example that
3628 doesn't work, please provide that example.
3629
3630 --Andrew Church
3631 achurch@achurch.org
3632 http://achurch.org/
3633
3634 >using /msg chanserv unban #channel doesn't remove every possible mask for your account? So it's pretty useless for example if a user used ?'s as character replacements. I am just re-writing a ban protection script and have fixed that issue simply replacin
3635 >g my match ?'s with *'s. I realise this may not be 100% but mIRC doesn't check ?'s in it's iswm match... So it's either immence cpu to calculate the formula with each character for every ? Or replace with a *.
3636 >
3637 >Anyway IRC Services should unban anything relevent to your account. The IP address which can be grabbed from the server? The current vhost for oper/NeoStats etc which would be in use? The original hostname from connect i.e. ip.yourisp.net which must be av
3638 >ailable because it's in whois information?
3639 >
3640 >I think at current it's not fully working.
3641 >
3642 >Regards,
3643 >
3644 >Jason Mainwaring
3645 >A+ Service Technician
3646 >Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
3647 >MCSA Messaging
3648 >Certified Novell Administrator
3649 >Phone: (02) 9908 4244
3650 >Mobile: 0413 161 708
3651 >E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
3652 >
3653 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3654 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Feb 18 06:20:04 2005
3655 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
3656 Date: Fri Feb 18 06:20:24 2005
3657 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
3658 In-Reply-To: <4215f3be.31054@achurch.org>
3659 References: <4215f3be.31054@achurch.org>
3660 Message-ID: <4215F994.8070305@frostycoolslug.com>
3661
3662 As an additional note, /cs unban doesnt seem to work when the user has a
3663 vhost completly different so their actual host (not sure about IRCd
3664 based hostmasking). Had a few complaints about this.
3665
3666 /****************************************
3667 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3668 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
3669 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3670 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3671 ****************************************/
3672
3673 Andrew Church wrote:
3674 > ChanServ already checks all of these. If you find an example that
3675 > doesn't work, please provide that example.
3676 >
3677 > --Andrew Church
3678 > achurch@achurch.org
3679 > http://achurch.org/
3680 >
3681 >
3682 >>using /msg chanserv unban #channel doesn't remove every possible mask for your account? So it's pretty useless for example if a user used ?'s as character replacements. I am just re-writing a ban protection script and have fixed that issue simply replacin
3683 >>g my match ?'s with *'s. I realise this may not be 100% but mIRC doesn't check ?'s in it's iswm match... So it's either immence cpu to calculate the formula with each character for every ? Or replace with a *.
3684 >>
3685 >>Anyway IRC Services should unban anything relevent to your account. The IP address which can be grabbed from the server? The current vhost for oper/NeoStats etc which would be in use? The original hostname from connect i.e. ip.yourisp.net which must be av
3686 >>ailable because it's in whois information?
3687 >>
3688 >>I think at current it's not fully working.
3689 >>
3690 >>Regards,
3691 >>
3692 >>Jason Mainwaring
3693 >>A+ Service Technician
3694 >>Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
3695 >>MCSA Messaging
3696 >>Certified Novell Administrator
3697 >>Phone: (02) 9908 4244
3698 >>Mobile: 0413 161 708
3699 >>E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
3700 >>
3701 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
3702 >
3703 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3704 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3705 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3706 >
3707 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Feb 18 23:36:04 2005
3708 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
3709 Date: Fri Feb 18 06:36:52 2005
3710 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
3711 In-Reply-To: <4215F994.8070305@frostycoolslug.com>
3712 Message-ID: <4215fd72.36542@achurch.org>
3713
3714 >As an additional note, /cs unban doesnt seem to work when the user has a
3715 > vhost completly different so their actual host (not sure about IRCd
3716 >based hostmasking). Had a few complaints about this.
3717
3718 Again, can you give concrete examples?
3719
3720 --Andrew Church
3721 achurch@achurch.org
3722 http://achurch.org/
3723 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Feb 18 11:09:32 2005
3724 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
3725 Date: Fri Feb 18 11:09:44 2005
3726 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
3727 In-Reply-To: <4215fd72.36542@achurch.org>
3728 References: <4215fd72.36542@achurch.org>
3729 Message-ID: <42163D6C.3090007@frostycoolslug.com>
3730
3731 my bad, seems its because our module is doing the sethost, rather than
3732 the IRCd doing it. Would probably explain it ;)
3733
3734
3735 /****************************************
3736 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
3737 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
3738 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
3739 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
3740 ****************************************/
3741
3742 Andrew Church wrote:
3743 >>As an additional note, /cs unban doesnt seem to work when the user has a
3744 >>vhost completly different so their actual host (not sure about IRCd
3745 >>based hostmasking). Had a few complaints about this.
3746 >
3747 >
3748 > Again, can you give concrete examples?
3749 >
3750 > --Andrew Church
3751 > achurch@achurch.org
3752 > http://achurch.org/
3753 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
3754 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3755 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3756 >
3757 From admin at epicirc.net Fri Feb 18 13:34:47 2005
3758 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
3759 Date: Fri Feb 18 13:35:33 2005
3760 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
3761 In-Reply-To: <42159df0.13733@achurch.org>
3762 Message-ID: <200502182135.j1ILYlpZ402064@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
3763
3764 Xchat:
3765
3766 [3:27pm] <ANTRAiCX> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
3767 experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
3768 many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
3769 activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
3770 is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
3771 questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
3772 Admin.
3773
3774 iircII on solaris:
3775
3776 [3:31pm] <work> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing
3777 a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive
3778 [3:31pm] <work> actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
3779 activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
3780 is
3781 [3:31pm] <work> our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you
3782 have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr.
3783
3784 And of course it still does it on mIRC as well.
3785
3786 So my tests show that this bug is in fact an ircservices bug, and not
3787 related to any mirc errors. Testing in 3 other clients all performed the
3788 exact same way, and duplicated the exact same results. The source notice of
3789 course didn't have the ":" in it, however it appeared at the same location
3790 for all 3 of the clients.
3791
3792 Thanks for any help you may be able to offer,
3793
3794 JL.
3795 admin@epicirc.net
3796 EpicIRC - irc.epicirc.net
3797
3798 -----Original Message-----
3799 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
3800 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
3801 Church
3802 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 1:48 AM
3803 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
3804 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
3805
3806 This is believed to be an mIRC bug. Try with another client.
3807
3808 --Andrew Church
3809 achurch@achurch.org
3810 http://achurch.org/
3811
3812 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
3813 >
3814 >--===============1706752752==
3815 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
3816 > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70"
3817 >
3818 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
3819 >
3820 >------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70
3821 >Content-Type: text/plain;
3822 > charset="us-ascii"
3823 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
3824 >
3825 >Hello... I have noticed a little error, and I just wanted to post here
3826 >to see if anyone had already posted regarding it, or if it was the first
3827 time.
3828 >
3829 >I run an IRC Network with Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.41
3830 >
3831 >When I send a global notice that is fairly long it appears that the
3832 >character ":" shows up in the notice. If I were to just sent a global
3833 >notice as an oper, Unreal would cut the message off before the ":"
3834 >would appear, so this only occurs with services.
3835 >
3836 >I have noticed it in Channel Join Notices, Network Connect Notices, and
3837 >Global Notices. Below is an example:
3838 >
3839 >-------------------------- Sending the notice with OperServ global
3840 >-------------------------
3841 >
3842 >[11:30pm] -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a
3843 >major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many
3844 >defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
3845 >activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it,
3846 >as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you
3847 >have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr.
3848 Network Admin.
3849 >
3850 >------------------------ Sending the same notice as an oper, and not
3851 >with services -----------------------
3852 >
3853 >[11:32pm] -XanaX- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a
3854 >major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many
3855 >defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
3856 activity of the network.
3857 >If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running
3858 >a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join
3859 >#Help and spe
3860 >
3861 >----------------------------------
3862 >
3863 >As you can see, Unreal cuts the message off when I send it as an oper.
3864 >It doesnt get past the word "speak". But if you notice in the notice
3865 >sent my Services, there is "Opers running :a scan to detect". The : is
3866 >definatly not in my notice.
3867 >
3868 >Any help or assistance regarding this would be great. Just thought it
3869 >should be noted for any future releases.
3870 >
3871 >Thank you for your hard work & development of open-sourced software.
3872 >
3873 >XanaX
3874 >irc.epicirc.net
3875 >
3876 >
3877 >------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70
3878 >Content-Type: text/html;
3879 > charset="us-ascii"
3880 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
3881 >
3882 ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
3883 ><HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
3884 >charset=3Dus-ascii"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604"
3885 >name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><SPAN
3886 >class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D2>Hello... I
3887 >have=20 noticed a little error, and I just wanted to post here to see
3888 >if anyone = had=20 already posted regarding it, or if it was the first
3889 >= time.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT
3890 >face=3DArial=20 size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3891 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I run
3892 >= an IRC Network=20 with Unreal3.2.2b and
3893 >ircservices-5.0.41</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3894 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3895 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3896 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>When
3897 >I = send a global=20 notice that is fairly long it appears that the
3898 >character ":" shows up in = the=20 notice.&nbsp; If I were to just sent
3899 >a global notice as an oper, Unreal = would=20 cut the message off
3900 >before the ":" would appear, so this only occurs = with=20
3901 >services.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN
3902 >class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3903 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3904 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I
3905 >have = noticed it in=20 Channel Join Notices, Network Connect Notices,
3906 >and Global Notices.&nbsp; = Below=20 is an example:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3907 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3908 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3909 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3910 >size=3D2>-------------------------- Sending the notice with OperServ =
3911 >global=20 -------------------------</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3912 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3913 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3914 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial =
3915 >size=3D2>[11:30pm] -Global-=20 [Network Notice] Our network has been
3916 >experiencing a major increase of=20 unattended bots connecting. We are
3917 >taking many defensive actions to make = sure=20 that they do not
3918 >interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you = receive a=20
3919 >CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to
3920 >detect =
3921 >
3922 >malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak
3923 >= to an=20 Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3924 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3925 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3926 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3927 >size=3D2>------------------------ Sending the same notice as an oper, =
3928 >and not with=20 services -----------------------</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3929 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3930 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3931 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial =
3932 >size=3D2>[11:32pm] -XanaX-=20 [Network Notice] Our network has been
3933 >experiencing a major increase of=20 unattended bots connecting. We are
3934 >taking many defensive actions to make = sure=20 that they do not
3935 >interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you = receive a=20
3936 >CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running a scan to
3937 >detect=20 malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help
3938 >and=20 spe</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN
3939 >class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3940 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3941 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3942 >size=3D2>----------------------------------</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3943 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3944 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3945 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As
3946 >you = can see,=20 Unreal cuts the message off when I send it as an
3947 >oper.&nbsp; It doesnt = get past=20 the word "speak".&nbsp; But if you
3948 >notice in the notice sent my = Services, there=20 is "Opers running :a
3949 >scan to detect".&nbsp; The : is definatly not in my =
3950 >
3951 >notice.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3952 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3953 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3954 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Any =
3955 >help or=20 assistance regarding this would be great.&nbsp; Just thought
3956 >it should = be noted=20 for any future releases.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3957 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3958 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3959 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank
3960 >= you for your=20 hard work &amp; development of open-sourced =
3961 >software.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN
3962 >class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3963 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
3964 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3965 >size=3D2>XanaX</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3966 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3967 >size=3D2>irc.epicirc.net</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
3968 ><DIV><SPAN class=3D558401406-18022005><FONT face=3DArial=20
3969 >size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
3970 >
3971 >------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5154F.A1A3BF70--
3972 >
3973 >
3974 >
3975 >--===============1706752752==
3976 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
3977 >MIME-Version: 1.0
3978 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
3979 >Content-Disposition: inline
3980 >
3981 >------------------------------------------------------------------
3982 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3983 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3984 >--===============1706752752==--
3985 >
3986 >
3987 ------------------------------------------------------------------
3988 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
3989 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
3990
3991
3992
3993
3994 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Fri Feb 18 16:00:30 2005
3995 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
3996 Date: Fri Feb 18 16:00:54 2005
3997 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
3998 Message-ID: <2c9f6d02ca0a56.2ca0a562c9f6d0@shaw.ca>
3999
4000 > From
4001 >ongeboren <xxx.coder@gmail.com>
4002 >I've just noticed your immense full of shit signature.
4003 >Do you think any software would match '?' wildcard character by making
4004 >all possible permutations of all possible characters??? You gringos
4005 >are ridiculous!
4006
4007 I don't appreciate getting e-mails like this, flaming is for lamers. That is my sig, It's not full of shit and you can easily look up certifications off the Microsoft website. "?" is a well known wildcard for a single character incase you didn't know you tool. If you read my e-mail instead of blaintantly flaming you would have seen I was mentioning my methods of what I did in my ban script because mIRC didn't seem to count "?"'s in it's iswm function as far as I could get to work last night. I for the time being changed them to "*"'s as I DIDN'T want to match every character for every "?". However once again the "?" is a well know single character wildcard.
4008
4009 Now on to your question Andrew.
4010 I connect and have my IP example 255.255.25.2 I have my actual hostname on the server which will be something like ppp255-255.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net then I oper and get a vhost of my.vhost
4011
4012 Now ?'s work as they should in your vhost and server hostname. However try banning *!*@255.255.??.? When you go to unban it will say you have been unbanned, yet you are still banned.
4013
4014 Regards,
4015
4016 Jason Mainwaring
4017 A+ Service Technician
4018 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
4019 MCSA Messaging
4020 Certified Novell Administrator
4021 Phone: (02) 9908 4244
4022 Mobile: 0413 161 708
4023 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
4024
4025 ----- Original Message -----
4026 From: Craig McLure <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
4027 Date: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:09 am
4028 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4029
4030 > my bad, seems its because our module is doing the sethost, rather than
4031 > the IRCd doing it. Would probably explain it ;)
4032 >
4033 >
4034 > /****************************************
4035 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4036 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
4037 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4038 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4039 > ****************************************/
4040 >
4041 > Andrew Church wrote:
4042 > >>As an additional note, /cs unban doesnt seem to work when the
4043 > user has a
4044 > >>vhost completly different so their actual host (not sure about IRCd
4045 > >>based hostmasking). Had a few complaints about this.
4046 > >
4047 > >
4048 > > Again, can you give concrete examples?
4049 > >
4050 > > --Andrew Church
4051 > > achurch@achurch.org
4052 > > http://achurch.org/
4053 > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
4054 > -
4055 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4056 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4057 > >
4058 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4059 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4060 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4061 >
4062
4063 From mark at ctcp.net Fri Feb 18 16:41:05 2005
4064 From: mark at ctcp.net (M)
4065 Date: Fri Feb 18 16:41:19 2005
4066 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4067 In-Reply-To: <2c9f6d02ca0a56.2ca0a562c9f6d0@shaw.ca>
4068 Message-ID: <20050219004117.234E2F6393B@sakura.ian-justman.com>
4069
4070 JASON M wrote:
4071 > I don't appreciate getting e-mails like this,
4072
4073 While I appreciate your upset over the quoted portion of the personal e-mail
4074 you received, this is a public list so it is inappropriate for you to
4075 forward an email to this list that was never part of this list in order to
4076 respond. The w**ker that sent the email obviously knew better than to make
4077 his comments publicly since if he had, you would not have had to defend
4078 yourself alone. However, your public response utilising a private e-mail
4079 does you no favours regardless of provocation. This list is purely for
4080 discussion of IRCServices and not a personal boxing ring.
4081
4082 Without wanting to further cause upset, but since it is now a topic you have
4083 chosen to raise on list and might be relevant to other posters now and in
4084 the future, you might want to drop personal information such as telephone
4085 numbers from your sig. IIRC, all mails to this list are available to anyone
4086 who chooses to browse the list archives including search engines. I would
4087 advise against offering personal information to this level on public forums.
4088
4089 M.
4090
4091
4092 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Feb 19 14:37:37 2005
4093 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
4094 Date: Fri Feb 18 21:47:45 2005
4095 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4096 In-Reply-To: <2c9f6d02ca0a56.2ca0a562c9f6d0@shaw.ca>
4097 Message-ID: <4216d2f4.43323@achurch.org>
4098
4099 >I connect and have my IP example 255.255.25.2 I have my actual hostname on the server which will be something like ppp255-255.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net then I oper and get a vhost of my.vhost
4100 >
4101 >Now ?'s work as they should in your vhost and server hostname. However try banning *!*@255.255.??.? When you go to unban it will say you have been unbanned, yet you are still banned.
4102
4103 I think you mentioned you were using Unreal--in that case, Unreal
4104 doesn't send IP addresses to remote servers, so there's no way for Services
4105 to tell whether a given ban matches your IP address. I agree it's
4106 confusing, though, and I'll contact the Unreal developers to see if
4107 anything can be done.
4108
4109 On a side note, please be aware that it is a violation of netiquette,
4110 and of the law in some areas, to post private E-mail on a public list
4111 without consent of the sender.
4112
4113 --Andrew Church
4114 achurch@achurch.org
4115 http://achurch.org/
4116 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Feb 19 14:48:04 2005
4117 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
4118 Date: Fri Feb 18 21:52:16 2005
4119 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
4120 In-Reply-To: <200502182135.j1ILYlpZ402064@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
4121 Message-ID: <4216d40a.43333@achurch.org>
4122
4123 Hmm, interesting. Can you provide a debug log from Services
4124 (ircservices -debug) for this behavior? If you could get a raw dump of
4125 the client/server connection, that would help as well; for example:
4126
4127 $ telnet host.name 6667
4128 NICK nick
4129 USER user * * user
4130
4131 and send the raw IRC data that follows.
4132
4133 --Andrew Church
4134 achurch@achurch.org
4135 http://achurch.org/
4136
4137 >Xchat:
4138 >
4139 >[3:27pm] <ANTRAiCX> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
4140 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
4141 >many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4142 >activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4143 >is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4144 >questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4145 >Admin.
4146 >
4147 >iircII on solaris:
4148 >
4149 >[3:31pm] <work> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing
4150 >a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive
4151 >[3:31pm] <work> actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4152 >activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4153 >is
4154 >[3:31pm] <work> our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you
4155 >have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr.
4156 >
4157 >And of course it still does it on mIRC as well.
4158 >
4159 >So my tests show that this bug is in fact an ircservices bug, and not
4160 >related to any mirc errors. Testing in 3 other clients all performed the
4161 >exact same way, and duplicated the exact same results. The source notice of
4162 >course didn't have the ":" in it, however it appeared at the same location
4163 >for all 3 of the clients.
4164 >
4165 >Thanks for any help you may be able to offer,
4166 >
4167 >JL.
4168 >admin@epicirc.net
4169 >EpicIRC - irc.epicirc.net
4170 From admin at epicirc.net Fri Feb 18 22:08:11 2005
4171 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
4172 Date: Fri Feb 18 22:08:43 2005
4173 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
4174 In-Reply-To: <4216d40a.43333@achurch.org>
4175 Message-ID: <200502190608.j1J68AHc181676@pimout4-ext.prodigy.net>
4176
4177 I'll get on that, try to scrape that all together :)
4178
4179 -----Original Message-----
4180 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
4181 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
4182 Church
4183 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:48 PM
4184 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
4185 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
4186
4187 Hmm, interesting. Can you provide a debug log from Services
4188 (ircservices -debug) for this behavior? If you could get a raw dump of the
4189 client/server connection, that would help as well; for example:
4190
4191 $ telnet host.name 6667
4192 NICK nick
4193 USER user * * user
4194
4195 and send the raw IRC data that follows.
4196
4197 --Andrew Church
4198 achurch@achurch.org
4199 http://achurch.org/
4200
4201 >Xchat:
4202 >
4203 >[3:27pm] <ANTRAiCX> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
4204 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4205 >taking many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt
4206 >the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please
4207 >ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots.
4208 >If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. -
4209 >XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
4210 >
4211 >iircII on solaris:
4212 >
4213 >[3:31pm] <work> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
4214 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4215 >taking many defensive [3:31pm] <work> actions to make sure that they do
4216 >not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP
4217 >LAG, please ignore it, as it is [3:31pm] <work> our Opers running :a
4218 >scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join
4219 >#Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr.
4220 >
4221 >And of course it still does it on mIRC as well.
4222 >
4223 >So my tests show that this bug is in fact an ircservices bug, and not
4224 >related to any mirc errors. Testing in 3 other clients all performed
4225 >the exact same way, and duplicated the exact same results. The source
4226 >notice of course didn't have the ":" in it, however it appeared at the
4227 >same location for all 3 of the clients.
4228 >
4229 >Thanks for any help you may be able to offer,
4230 >
4231 >JL.
4232 >admin@epicirc.net
4233 >EpicIRC - irc.epicirc.net
4234 ------------------------------------------------------------------
4235 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4236 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4237
4238
4239
4240
4241 From admin at epicirc.net Fri Feb 18 22:43:00 2005
4242 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
4243 Date: Fri Feb 18 22:43:17 2005
4244 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
4245 In-Reply-To: <4216d40a.43333@achurch.org>
4246 Message-ID: <200502190643.j1J6gxpZ285130@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
4247
4248 RAW Telnet session:
4249
4250 :Global!services@epicirc.net NOTICE $* :[Network Notice] Our network has
4251 been experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4252 taking many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the
4253 normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it,
4254 as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4255 questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4256 Admin.
4257
4258
4259 IRCServices log (debug):
4260
4261 [Feb 19 00:26:25.908610 2005] debug: Received: :XanaX !
4262 operserv@services.epicirc.net :global [Network Notice] Our network has been
4263 experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
4264 many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4265 activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4266 is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4267 questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4268 Admin.
4269
4270 [Feb 19 00:26:25.908762 2005] operserv/main: XanaX: global [Network Notice]
4271 Our network has been experiencing a major increase of unattended bots
4272 connecting. We are taking many defensive actions to make sure that they do
4273 not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG,
4274 please ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious
4275 bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. -
4276 XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
4277
4278 [Feb 19 00:26:25.911967 2005] debug: Sent: :Global NOTICE $* :[Network
4279 Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major increase of unattended
4280 bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions to make sure that they
4281 do not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP
4282 LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect
4283 malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an
4284 Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
4285
4286
4287 ... And just to be clear, let me paste a copy of the 'alias' that I've been
4288 using to run this command.
4289
4290 alias xdccwarn { .operserv global \ 2\1f[Network Notice]\ 2\1f Our network has been
4291 experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
4292 many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4293 activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4294 is our Opers running a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4295 questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4296 Admin.\ f }
4297
4298 Hm, that is weird. I also wanted to test sending the message from another
4299 client than mIRC, and seeing what the result was.
4300
4301 ....
4302
4303 \ 2[\ 2\1f12:40am\1f\ 2]\ 2 -Global- \ 2\1f[Network Notice]\ 2\1f Our network has been
4304 experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
4305 many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4306 activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4307 is our Opers running a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4308 questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4309 Admin.\ f
4310
4311 ..... So I guess all that work just proved you guys were right. When I used
4312 BitchX to SEND the notice (instead of mIRC) the result was without error. A
4313 bug in mIRC must place the : there on outgoing messages if it is over a
4314 certain length or something.
4315
4316 If anyone has anything to add I would be glad to hear it, but as of this
4317 test I will go ahead and just assume an mIRC bug, I will try to submit it
4318 to them see if it can be fixed that way.
4319
4320 Thanks for all the support,
4321
4322 XanaX
4323 EpicIRC - irc.epicirc.net
4324
4325
4326
4327 -----Original Message-----
4328 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
4329 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
4330 Church
4331 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:48 PM
4332 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
4333 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
4334
4335 Hmm, interesting. Can you provide a debug log from Services
4336 (ircservices -debug) for this behavior? If you could get a raw dump of the
4337 client/server connection, that would help as well; for example:
4338
4339 $ telnet host.name 6667
4340 NICK nick
4341 USER user * * user
4342
4343 and send the raw IRC data that follows.
4344
4345 --Andrew Church
4346 achurch@achurch.org
4347 http://achurch.org/
4348
4349 >Xchat:
4350 >
4351 >[3:27pm] <ANTRAiCX> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
4352 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4353 >taking many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt
4354 >the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please
4355 >ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots.
4356 >If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. -
4357 >XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
4358 >
4359 >iircII on solaris:
4360 >
4361 >[3:31pm] <work> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
4362 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4363 >taking many defensive [3:31pm] <work> actions to make sure that they do
4364 >not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP
4365 >LAG, please ignore it, as it is [3:31pm] <work> our Opers running :a
4366 >scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join
4367 >#Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr.
4368 >
4369 >And of course it still does it on mIRC as well.
4370 >
4371 >So my tests show that this bug is in fact an ircservices bug, and not
4372 >related to any mirc errors. Testing in 3 other clients all performed
4373 >the exact same way, and duplicated the exact same results. The source
4374 >notice of course didn't have the ":" in it, however it appeared at the
4375 >same location for all 3 of the clients.
4376 >
4377 >Thanks for any help you may be able to offer,
4378 >
4379 >JL.
4380 >admin@epicirc.net
4381 >EpicIRC - irc.epicirc.net
4382 ------------------------------------------------------------------
4383 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4384 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4385
4386
4387
4388
4389 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Feb 19 16:23:21 2005
4390 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
4391 Date: Fri Feb 18 23:27:05 2005
4392 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
4393 In-Reply-To: <200502190643.j1J6gxpZ285130@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
4394 Message-ID: <4216ea44.45020@achurch.org>
4395
4396 Thanks for the information--I've updated the FAQ (C.10)
4397 appropriately.
4398
4399 --Andrew Church
4400 achurch@achurch.org
4401 http://achurch.org/
4402
4403 >RAW Telnet session:
4404 >
4405 >:Global!services@epicirc.net NOTICE $* :[Network Notice] Our network has
4406 >been experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4407 >taking many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the
4408 >normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it,
4409 >as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4410 >questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4411 >Admin.
4412 >
4413 >
4414 >IRCServices log (debug):
4415 >
4416 >[Feb 19 00:26:25.908610 2005] debug: Received: :XanaX !
4417 >operserv@services.epicirc.net :global [Network Notice] Our network has been
4418 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
4419 >many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4420 >activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4421 >is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4422 >questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4423 >Admin.
4424 >
4425 >[Feb 19 00:26:25.908762 2005] operserv/main: XanaX: global [Network Notice]
4426 >Our network has been experiencing a major increase of unattended bots
4427 >connecting. We are taking many defensive actions to make sure that they do
4428 >not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG,
4429 >please ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious
4430 >bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. -
4431 >XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
4432 >
4433 >[Feb 19 00:26:25.911967 2005] debug: Sent: :Global NOTICE $* :[Network
4434 >Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major increase of unattended
4435 >bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions to make sure that they
4436 >do not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP
4437 >LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect
4438 >malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an
4439 >Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
4440 >
4441 >
4442 >... And just to be clear, let me paste a copy of the 'alias' that I've been
4443 >using to run this command.
4444 >
4445 >alias xdccwarn { .operserv global \ 2\1f[Network Notice]\ 2\1f Our network has been
4446 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
4447 >many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4448 >activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4449 >is our Opers running a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4450 >questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4451 >Admin.\ f }
4452 >
4453 >Hm, that is weird. I also wanted to test sending the message from another
4454 >client than mIRC, and seeing what the result was.
4455 >
4456 >....
4457 >
4458 >\ 2[\ 2\1f12:40am\1f\ 2]\ 2 -Global- \ 2\1f[Network Notice]\ 2\1f Our network has been
4459 >experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking
4460 >many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal
4461 >activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it
4462 >is our Opers running a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any
4463 >questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network
4464 >Admin.\ f
4465 >
4466 >..... So I guess all that work just proved you guys were right. When I used
4467 >BitchX to SEND the notice (instead of mIRC) the result was without error. A
4468 >bug in mIRC must place the : there on outgoing messages if it is over a
4469 >certain length or something.
4470 >
4471 >If anyone has anything to add I would be glad to hear it, but as of this
4472 >test I will go ahead and just assume an mIRC bug, I will try to submit it
4473 >to them see if it can be fixed that way.
4474 >
4475 >Thanks for all the support,
4476 >
4477 >XanaX
4478 >EpicIRC - irc.epicirc.net
4479 >
4480 >
4481 >
4482 >-----Original Message-----
4483 >From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
4484 >[mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
4485 >Church
4486 >Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:48 PM
4487 >To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
4488 >Subject: RE: [IRCServices] Notice Bug
4489 >
4490 > Hmm, interesting. Can you provide a debug log from Services
4491 >(ircservices -debug) for this behavior? If you could get a raw dump of the
4492 >client/server connection, that would help as well; for example:
4493 >
4494 >$ telnet host.name 6667
4495 >NICK nick
4496 >USER user * * user
4497 >
4498 >and send the raw IRC data that follows.
4499 >
4500 > --Andrew Church
4501 > achurch@achurch.org
4502 > http://achurch.org/
4503 >
4504 >>Xchat:
4505 >>
4506 >>[3:27pm] <ANTRAiCX> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
4507 >>experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4508 >>taking many defensive actions to make sure that they do not interrupt
4509 >>the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please
4510 >>ignore it, as it is our Opers running :a scan to detect malicious bots.
4511 >>If you have any questions, please join #Help and speak to an Oper. -
4512 >>XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
4513 >>
4514 >>iircII on solaris:
4515 >>
4516 >>[3:31pm] <work> -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been
4517 >>experiencing a major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are
4518 >>taking many defensive [3:31pm] <work> actions to make sure that they do
4519 >>not interrupt the normal activity of the network. If you receive a CTCP
4520 >>LAG, please ignore it, as it is [3:31pm] <work> our Opers running :a
4521 >>scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join
4522 >>#Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr.
4523 >>
4524 >>And of course it still does it on mIRC as well.
4525 >>
4526 >>So my tests show that this bug is in fact an ircservices bug, and not
4527 >>related to any mirc errors. Testing in 3 other clients all performed
4528 >>the exact same way, and duplicated the exact same results. The source
4529 >>notice of course didn't have the ":" in it, however it appeared at the
4530 >>same location for all 3 of the clients.
4531 >>
4532 >>Thanks for any help you may be able to offer,
4533 >>
4534 >>JL.
4535 >>admin@epicirc.net
4536 >>EpicIRC - irc.epicirc.net
4537 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4538 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4539 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4540 >
4541 >
4542 >
4543 >
4544 >------------------------------------------------------------------
4545 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4546 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4547 From xxx.coder at gmail.com Sat Feb 19 06:35:32 2005
4548 From: xxx.coder at gmail.com (ongeboren)
4549 Date: Sat Feb 19 06:36:36 2005
4550 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4551 In-Reply-To: <2c9f6d02ca0a56.2ca0a562c9f6d0@shaw.ca>
4552 References: <2c9f6d02ca0a56.2ca0a562c9f6d0@shaw.ca>
4553 Message-ID: <ce6d53600502190635754f83e0@mail.gmail.com>
4554
4555 You try to say that matching a '?' would be equal an "immence cpu"
4556 work to calculate all possible permutations. Well.. correct me if I'm
4557 wrong but it should not be more than a ++ operation for your string
4558 pointer - one cpu cycle. Saying this and replying to my *personal*
4559 e-mail to the list you really proved you don't deserve your signature.
4560
4561 case closed.
4562
4563
4564 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:00:30 -0800, JASON M <dawgclan@shaw.ca> wrote:
4565 > > From
4566 > >ongeboren <xxx.coder@gmail.com>
4567 > >I've just noticed your immense full of shit signature.
4568 > >Do you think any software would match '?' wildcard character by making
4569 > >all possible permutations of all possible characters??? You gringos
4570 > >are ridiculous!
4571 >
4572 > I don't appreciate getting e-mails like this, flaming is for lamers. That is my sig, It's not full of shit and you can easily look up certifications off the Microsoft website. "?" is a well known wildcard for a single character incase you didn't know you tool. If you read my e-mail instead of blaintantly flaming you would have seen I was mentioning my methods of what I did in my ban script because mIRC didn't seem to count "?"'s in it's iswm function as far as I could get to work last night. I for the time being changed them to "*"'s as I DIDN'T want to match every character for every "?". However once again the "?" is a well know single character wildcard.
4573 >
4574 > Now on to your question Andrew.
4575 > I connect and have my IP example 255.255.25.2 I have my actual hostname on the server which will be something like ppp255-255.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net then I oper and get a vhost of my.vhost
4576 >
4577 > Now ?'s work as they should in your vhost and server hostname. However try banning *!*@255.255.??.? When you go to unban it will say you have been unbanned, yet you are still banned.
4578 >
4579 > Regards,
4580 >
4581 > Jason Mainwaring
4582 > A+ Service Technician
4583 > Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
4584 > MCSA Messaging
4585 > Certified Novell Administrator
4586 > Phone: (02) 9908 4244
4587 > Mobile: 0413 161 708
4588 > E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
4589 >
4590 > ----- Original Message -----
4591 > From: Craig McLure <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
4592 > Date: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:09 am
4593 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4594 >
4595 > > my bad, seems its because our module is doing the sethost, rather than
4596 > > the IRCd doing it. Would probably explain it ;)
4597 > >
4598 > >
4599 > > /****************************************
4600 > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4601 > > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
4602 > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4603 > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4604 > > ****************************************/
4605 > >
4606 > > Andrew Church wrote:
4607 > > >>As an additional note, /cs unban doesnt seem to work when the
4608 > > user has a
4609 > > >>vhost completly different so their actual host (not sure about IRCd
4610 > > >>based hostmasking). Had a few complaints about this.
4611 > > >
4612 > > >
4613 > > > Again, can you give concrete examples?
4614 > > >
4615 > > > --Andrew Church
4616 > > > achurch@achurch.org
4617 > > > http://achurch.org/
4618 > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
4619 > > -
4620 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4621 > > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4622 > > >
4623 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4624 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4625 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4626 > >
4627 >
4628 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4629 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4630 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4631 >
4632
4633
4634 --
4635 Evlogi Petrov - ongeboren
4636 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Feb 19 10:11:40 2005
4637 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
4638 Date: Sat Feb 19 10:11:50 2005
4639 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4640 In-Reply-To: <4216d2f4.43323@achurch.org>
4641 References: <4216d2f4.43323@achurch.org>
4642 Message-ID: <4217815C.3000201@frostycoolslug.com>
4643
4644 Hmm, maybe instead of saying 'You have been unbanned from #channel' it
4645 could say 'You were not found on the #channel ban list', at least that
4646 way, users are slightly less confused with being told they are unbanned,
4647 and in fact not being.
4648
4649 /****************************************
4650 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4651 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
4652 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4653 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4654 ****************************************/
4655
4656 Andrew Church wrote:
4657 >>I connect and have my IP example 255.255.25.2 I have my actual hostname on the server which will be something like ppp255-255.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net then I oper and get a vhost of my.vhost
4658 >>
4659 >>Now ?'s work as they should in your vhost and server hostname. However try banning *!*@255.255.??.? When you go to unban it will say you have been unbanned, yet you are still banned.
4660 >
4661 >
4662 > I think you mentioned you were using Unreal--in that case, Unreal
4663 > doesn't send IP addresses to remote servers, so there's no way for Services
4664 > to tell whether a given ban matches your IP address. I agree it's
4665 > confusing, though, and I'll contact the Unreal developers to see if
4666 > anything can be done.
4667 >
4668 > On a side note, please be aware that it is a violation of netiquette,
4669 > and of the law in some areas, to post private E-mail on a public list
4670 > without consent of the sender.
4671 >
4672 > --Andrew Church
4673 > achurch@achurch.org
4674 > http://achurch.org/
4675 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4676 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4677 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4678 >
4679 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Sat Feb 19 15:08:10 2005
4680 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
4681 Date: Sat Feb 19 15:08:20 2005
4682 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4683 Message-ID: <2d67bbe2d64d68.2d64d682d67bbe@shaw.ca>
4684
4685 ongeboren: Once again I was talking about if I were to make an alias in mIRC for my ban script issues. Not coding a dll for a function.
4686
4687 Craig: I believe that would be only a slight improvement, I hope Andrew can work something out with unreal in getting a fix for this. "Not finding" would only be a play on words I feel as it doesn't result in a fix.
4688
4689 On another note, the only reason we are using unrealircd is because one of the servers has Windows. Is there a better alternative for an IRCd? All the others are running a flavour of *NIX.
4690
4691 Regards,
4692
4693 Jason Mainwaring
4694 A+ Service Technician
4695 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
4696 MCSA Messaging
4697 Certified Novell Administrator
4698 Phone: (02) 9908 4244
4699 Mobile: 0413 161 708
4700 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
4701
4702 ----- Original Message -----
4703 From: Craig McLure <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
4704 Date: Saturday, February 19, 2005 10:11 am
4705 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4706
4707 > Hmm, maybe instead of saying 'You have been unbanned from
4708 > #channel' it
4709 > could say 'You were not found on the #channel ban list', at least that
4710 > way, users are slightly less confused with being told they are
4711 > unbanned,and in fact not being.
4712 >
4713 > /****************************************
4714 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4715 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
4716 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4717 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4718 > ****************************************/
4719 >
4720 > Andrew Church wrote:
4721 > >>I connect and have my IP example 255.255.25.2 I have my actual
4722 > hostname on the server which will be something like ppp255-
4723 > 255.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net then I oper and get a vhost of my.vhost
4724 > >>
4725 > >>Now ?'s work as they should in your vhost and server hostname.
4726 > However try banning *!*@255.255.??.? When you go to unban it will
4727 > say you have been unbanned, yet you are still banned.
4728 > >
4729 > >
4730 > > I think you mentioned you were using Unreal--in that case,
4731 > Unreal> doesn't send IP addresses to remote servers, so there's no
4732 > way for Services
4733 > > to tell whether a given ban matches your IP address. I agree it's
4734 > > confusing, though, and I'll contact the Unreal developers to see if
4735 > > anything can be done.
4736 > >
4737 > > On a side note, please be aware that it is a violation of
4738 > netiquette,> and of the law in some areas, to post private E-mail
4739 > on a public list
4740 > > without consent of the sender.
4741 > >
4742 > > --Andrew Church
4743 > > achurch@achurch.org
4744 > > http://achurch.org/
4745 > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
4746 > -
4747 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4748 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4749 > >
4750 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4751 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4752 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4753 >
4754
4755 From dawgclan at shaw.ca Sat Feb 19 15:19:56 2005
4756 From: dawgclan at shaw.ca (JASON M)
4757 Date: Sat Feb 19 15:20:08 2005
4758 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4759 Message-ID: <2d6a8942d66723.2d667232d6a894@shaw.ca>
4760
4761 Andrew, you say that the server doesn't have IP address information? How does whois information work? Because when whois'ing users as an oper you see:
4762 user is connecting from *@removed.Murmansk.dial.rol.ru 255.25.255.25
4763 Now how would the IP address be shown? Wouldn't it be server side?
4764
4765 Regards,
4766
4767 Jason Mainwaring
4768 A+ Service Technician
4769 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
4770 MCSA Messaging
4771 Certified Novell Administrator
4772 Phone: (02) 9908 4244
4773 Mobile: 0413 161 708
4774 E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
4775
4776 ----- Original Message -----
4777 From: JASON M <dawgclan@shaw.ca>
4778 Date: Saturday, February 19, 2005 3:08 pm
4779 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4780
4781 > ongeboren: Once again I was talking about if I were to make an
4782 > alias in mIRC for my ban script issues. Not coding a dll for a
4783 > function.
4784 > Craig: I believe that would be only a slight improvement, I hope
4785 > Andrew can work something out with unreal in getting a fix for
4786 > this. "Not finding" would only be a play on words I feel as it
4787 > doesn't result in a fix.
4788 >
4789 > On another note, the only reason we are using unrealircd is
4790 > because one of the servers has Windows. Is there a better
4791 > alternative for an IRCd? All the others are running a flavour of *NIX.
4792 >
4793 > Regards,
4794 >
4795 > Jason Mainwaring
4796 > A+ Service Technician
4797 > Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator
4798 > MCSA Messaging
4799 > Certified Novell Administrator
4800 > Phone: (02) 9908 4244
4801 > Mobile: 0413 161 708
4802 > E-mail: dawgclan@shaw.ca
4803 >
4804 > ----- Original Message -----
4805 > From: Craig McLure <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
4806 > Date: Saturday, February 19, 2005 10:11 am
4807 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4808 >
4809 > > Hmm, maybe instead of saying 'You have been unbanned from
4810 > > #channel' it
4811 > > could say 'You were not found on the #channel ban list', at
4812 > least that
4813 > > way, users are slightly less confused with being told they are
4814 > > unbanned,and in fact not being.
4815 > >
4816 > > /****************************************
4817 > > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4818 > > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
4819 > > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4820 > > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4821 > > ****************************************/
4822 > >
4823 > > Andrew Church wrote:
4824 > > >>I connect and have my IP example 255.255.25.2 I have my actual
4825 > > hostname on the server which will be something like ppp255-
4826 > > 255.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net then I oper and get a vhost of
4827 > my.vhost> >>
4828 > > >>Now ?'s work as they should in your vhost and server hostname.
4829 > > However try banning *!*@255.255.??.? When you go to unban it
4830 > will
4831 > > say you have been unbanned, yet you are still banned.
4832 > > >
4833 > > >
4834 > > > I think you mentioned you were using Unreal--in that
4835 > case,
4836 > > Unreal> doesn't send IP addresses to remote servers, so there's
4837 > no
4838 > > way for Services
4839 > > > to tell whether a given ban matches your IP address. I agree it's
4840 > > > confusing, though, and I'll contact the Unreal developers to
4841 > see if
4842 > > > anything can be done.
4843 > > >
4844 > > > On a side note, please be aware that it is a violation of
4845 > > netiquette,> and of the law in some areas, to post private E-
4846 > mail
4847 > > on a public list
4848 > > > without consent of the sender.
4849 > > >
4850 > > > --Andrew Church
4851 > > > achurch@achurch.org
4852 > > > http://achurch.org/
4853 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
4854 > --
4855 > > -
4856 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4857 > > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4858 > > >
4859 > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
4860 > -
4861 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4862 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4863 > >
4864 >
4865 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
4866 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
4867 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
4868 >
4869
4870 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Feb 19 15:24:26 2005
4871 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
4872 Date: Sat Feb 19 15:24:30 2005
4873 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4874 In-Reply-To: <2d67bbe2d64d68.2d64d682d67bbe@shaw.ca>
4875 References: <2d67bbe2d64d68.2d64d682d67bbe@shaw.ca>
4876 Message-ID: <4217CAAA.4070401@frostycoolslug.com>
4877
4878 JASON M wrote:
4879 > Craig: I believe that would be only a slight improvement, I hope Andrew can work something out with unreal in getting a fix for this. "Not finding" would only be a play on words I feel as it doesn't result in a fix.
4880
4881 Granted, but at least it would be an improvement! - I continuously get
4882 users approching staff saying 'Chanserv says i was unbanned, but when i
4883 try to join, it says that i'm still banned', a message saying that
4884 chanserv HASN'T unbanned the user would be benificial. (Shouldnt be hard
4885 to code.. just a bool, true if its set a -b, false if it hasnt, then do
4886 a check on it to decide the message)
4887
4888 As far as i am aware, the unreal team DID fix the IP passing issue with
4889 one of their latest releases (i think 3.2.2b has it) although i wouldnt
4890 put any money on it. If it HASN'T been fixed, then the chances are, it
4891 wont be, and if it isn't fixed, there would be no 'Workaround' for services.
4892 From medice at gmx.at Sat Feb 19 15:26:09 2005
4893 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
4894 Date: Sat Feb 19 15:26:10 2005
4895 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4896 In-Reply-To: <2d6a8942d66723.2d667232d6a894@shaw.ca>
4897 References: <2d6a8942d66723.2d667232d6a894@shaw.ca>
4898 Message-ID: <4217CB11.8010106@gmx.at>
4899
4900 JASON M wrote:
4901 > Andrew, you say that the server doesn't have IP address information? How does whois information work? Because when whois'ing users as an oper you see:
4902 > user is connecting from *@removed.Murmansk.dial.rol.ru 255.25.255.25
4903 > Now how would the IP address be shown? Wouldn't it be server side?
4904 >
4905 > Regards,
4906 >
4907 > Jason Mainwaring
4908
4909 this is a rather new feature in unrealircd. Unreal now keeps host, ip
4910 and an eventually vhost in evidence.
4911
4912 greetings
4913 Medce
4914
4915 From ShadowMaster at shadow-realm.org Sat Feb 19 16:22:24 2005
4916 From: ShadowMaster at shadow-realm.org (ShadowMaster)
4917 Date: Sat Feb 19 16:22:34 2005
4918 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4919 In-Reply-To: <4216d2f4.43323@achurch.org>
4920 References: <4216d2f4.43323@achurch.org>
4921 Message-ID: <200502200122.24667.ShadowMaster@shadow-realm.org>
4922
4923 On Saturday 19 February 2005 15:37, Andrew Church wrote:
4924 > I think you mentioned you were using Unreal--in that case, Unreal
4925 > doesn't send IP addresses to remote servers, so there's no way for Services
4926 > to tell whether a given ban matches your IP address. I agree it's
4927 > confusing, though, and I'll contact the Unreal developers to see if
4928 > anything can be done.
4929
4930 Its been a while since i checked, but i do belive at least later versions of
4931 Unreal support SVSMODE -b <channel> <nickname> or a similiar syntax which
4932 causes the IRCd to remove any and all bans matching the user on said channel.
4933
4934 --
4935 Yours sincerely
4936 Thomas Juberg Stens?s
4937 -- What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
4938
4939 --
4940 This message has been scanned for viruses and
4941 dangerous content by ShadowRealm mailsystems,
4942 and is believed to be clean.
4943
4944 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Feb 19 17:46:35 2005
4945 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
4946 Date: Sat Feb 19 17:46:39 2005
4947 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4948 In-Reply-To: <200502200122.24667.ShadowMaster@shadow-realm.org>
4949 References: <4216d2f4.43323@achurch.org>
4950 <200502200122.24667.ShadowMaster@shadow-realm.org>
4951 Message-ID: <4217EBFB.7000907@frostycoolslug.com>
4952
4953 Semi-true..
4954
4955 Craig sets mode +b to Craig!*@*.chatspike.net
4956 /os raw :Chanserv svsmode #winbot -b Craig
4957 ChanServ sets mode -b to Craig!*@*.chatspike.net
4958 Craig sets mode +b to Craig!*@XX.XXX.XXX.227
4959 /os raw :Chanserv svsmode #winbot -b Craig
4960 *nothing*
4961
4962 Once again, this seems not to work with IPs..
4963
4964 /****************************************
4965 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
4966 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
4967 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
4968 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
4969 ****************************************/
4970
4971 ShadowMaster wrote:
4972 > Its been a while since i checked, but i do belive at least later versions of
4973 > Unreal support SVSMODE -b <channel> <nickname> or a similiar syntax which
4974 > causes the IRCd to remove any and all bans matching the user on said channel.
4975 >
4976 > --
4977 > Yours sincerely
4978 > Thomas Juberg Stens?s
4979 > -- What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
4980 >
4981 From lordbergee at comcast.net Sat Feb 19 18:39:11 2005
4982 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
4983 Date: Sat Feb 19 18:39:23 2005
4984 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
4985 In-Reply-To: <4217EBFB.7000907@frostycoolslug.com>
4986 References: <4216d2f4.43323@achurch.org> <200502200122.24667.ShadowMaster@shadow-realm.org>
4987 <4217EBFB.7000907@frostycoolslug.com>
4988 Message-ID: <4217F84F.7000307@comcast.net>
4989
4990 This is true in the currently released versions of Unreal but that
4991 appears to have been fixed for the next release.
4992 See: http://bugs.unrealircd.org/view.php?id=2270
4993
4994 For what it's worth, Services doesn't use this feature of Unreal right
4995 now, but it might be worth considering because then Unreal will also
4996 take care of removing the extended ban types. This was, Services does
4997 not even need to know what each ban type does.
4998
4999 Bergee
5000
5001 Craig McLure wrote:
5002 > Semi-true..
5003 >
5004 > Craig sets mode +b to Craig!*@*.chatspike.net
5005 > /os raw :Chanserv svsmode #winbot -b Craig
5006 > ChanServ sets mode -b to Craig!*@*.chatspike.net
5007 > Craig sets mode +b to Craig!*@XX.XXX.XXX.227
5008 > /os raw :Chanserv svsmode #winbot -b Craig
5009 > *nothing*
5010 >
5011 > Once again, this seems not to work with IPs..
5012 >
5013 > /****************************************
5014 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5015 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
5016 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
5017 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
5018 > ****************************************/
5019 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Feb 20 11:41:44 2005
5020 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5021 Date: Sat Feb 19 18:42:20 2005
5022 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
5023 In-Reply-To: <200502200122.24667.ShadowMaster@shadow-realm.org>
5024 Message-ID: <4217f906.53442@achurch.org>
5025
5026 >Its been a while since i checked, but i do belive at least later versions of
5027 >Unreal support SVSMODE -b <channel> <nickname> or a similiar syntax which
5028 >causes the IRCd to remove any and all bans matching the user on said channel.
5029
5030 I actually checked for that, but it doesn't handle IP addresses
5031 either...
5032
5033 --Andrew Church
5034 achurch@achurch.org
5035 http://achurch.org/
5036 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Feb 20 11:42:17 2005
5037 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5038 Date: Sat Feb 19 18:43:10 2005
5039 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
5040 In-Reply-To: <2d6a8942d66723.2d667232d6a894@shaw.ca>
5041 Message-ID: <4217f938.53452@achurch.org>
5042
5043 >Andrew, you say that the server doesn't have IP address information? How does whois information work? Because when whois'ing users as an oper you see:
5044 >user is connecting from *@removed.Murmansk.dial.rol.ru 255.25.255.25
5045 >Now how would the IP address be shown? Wouldn't it be server side?
5046
5047 Only the server to which the user is connected has this information;
5048 it's not passed on to other servers.
5049
5050 --Andrew Church
5051 achurch@achurch.org
5052 http://achurch.org/
5053 From lordbergee at comcast.net Sat Feb 19 18:52:13 2005
5054 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
5055 Date: Sat Feb 19 18:52:28 2005
5056 Subject: [IRCServices] Chanserv UNBAN bug?
5057 In-Reply-To: <4217f938.53452@achurch.org>
5058 References: <4217f938.53452@achurch.org>
5059 Message-ID: <4217FB5D.9060306@comcast.net>
5060
5061 This used to be true as well, but the Unreal coders did implement this a
5062 few versions ago. Although to active this feature, you do have to
5063 indicate that you support it by sending the "NICKIP" token with your
5064 PROTOCTL command. See: http://bugs.unrealircd.org/view.php?id=605 and
5065 "protoctl.txt" distributed with Unreal for more information.
5066
5067 Bergee
5068
5069 Andrew Church wrote:
5070
5071 >>Andrew, you say that the server doesn't have IP address information? How does whois information work? Because when whois'ing users as an oper you see:
5072 >>user is connecting from *@removed.Murmansk.dial.rol.ru 255.25.255.25
5073 >>Now how would the IP address be shown? Wouldn't it be server side?
5074 >
5075 >
5076 > Only the server to which the user is connected has this information;
5077 > it's not passed on to other servers.
5078 >
5079 > --Andrew Church
5080 > achurch@achurch.org
5081 > http://achurch.org/
5082 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
5083 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5084 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5085 >
5086 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Feb 20 16:49:51 2005
5087 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5088 Date: Sat Feb 19 23:51:52 2005
5089 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal IP ban issue
5090 Message-ID: <42184192.03247@achurch.org>
5091
5092 I've checked the latest version of Unreal, and it does indeed support
5093 NICKIP (it looks like my CVS checkout was on the wrong branch). I've also
5094 confirmed that UNBAN works properly, so those who are having problems
5095 should upgrade Unreal.
5096
5097 --Andrew Church
5098 achurch@achurch.org
5099 http://achurch.org/
5100 From admin at epicirc.net Sun Feb 20 09:33:51 2005
5101 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
5102 Date: Sun Feb 20 09:34:18 2005
5103 Subject: FW: [IRCServices] Notice Bug (Update)
5104 Message-ID: <200502201734.j1KHXpur136694@pimout2-ext.prodigy.net>
5105
5106 I have posted regarding this bug on the mIRC Bug Forums. They have verified
5107 that it is infact happening. We have found a 'semi' solution to the problem
5108 though, that may would be good for your to add on the faq.
5109
5110 If I send the notice " /OperServ Global <really long noitce>" That is when
5111 the ":" (colon) will appear.
5112
5113 HOWEVER, if I were to do "/msg OperServ Global <really long notice>" The
5114 colon does not appear.
5115
5116 So... it seems that when mIRC is pulling the alias for /operserv or
5117 /chanserv it somehow creates this error. For anyone else out there that may
5118 ever have this problem, until it is fixed just use /msg operserv to get
5119 around it.
5120
5121 Darvocet
5122 EpicIRC.Net - irc.epicirc.net
5123
5124
5125
5126 _____
5127
5128 Hello... I have noticed a little error, and I just wanted to post here to
5129 see if anyone had already posted regarding it, or if it was the first time.
5130
5131 I run an IRC Network with Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.41
5132
5133 When I send a global notice that is fairly long it appears that the
5134 character ":" shows up in the notice. If I were to just sent a global
5135 notice as an oper, Unreal would cut the message off before the ":" would
5136 appear, so this only occurs with services.
5137
5138 I have noticed it in Channel Join Notices, Network Connect Notices, and
5139 Global Notices. Below is an example:
5140
5141 -------------------------- Sending the notice with OperServ global
5142 -------------------------
5143
5144 [11:30pm] -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a
5145 major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive
5146 actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the
5147 network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers
5148 running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please
5149 join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
5150
5151 ------------------------ Sending the same notice as an oper, and not with
5152 services -----------------------
5153
5154 [11:32pm] -XanaX- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major
5155 increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions
5156 to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the network.
5157 If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running a
5158 scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help
5159 and spe
5160 ....
5161 ....
5162
5163 -------------- next part --------------
5164 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
5165 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050220/d96e2975/attachment.htm
5166 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun Feb 20 10:32:12 2005
5167 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
5168 Date: Sun Feb 20 10:32:14 2005
5169 Subject: [IRCServices] Notice Bug (Update)
5170 In-Reply-To: <200502201734.j1KHXpur136694@pimout2-ext.prodigy.net>
5171 References: <200502201734.j1KHXpur136694@pimout2-ext.prodigy.net>
5172 Message-ID: <4218D7AC.10104@frostycoolslug.com>
5173
5174 Straying off topic slightly..
5175
5176 If your looking for a 'Quick fix' to this problem, add the following to
5177 your mIRC remotes:
5178
5179 alias operserv {
5180 .msg operserv $1-
5181 }
5182
5183 The /operserv will be sent to the services correctly, without the :
5184
5185 /****************************************
5186 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5187 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
5188 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
5189 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
5190 ****************************************/
5191
5192 EpicIRC Administration wrote:
5193 > I have posted regarding this bug on the mIRC Bug Forums. They have verified
5194 > that it is infact happening. We have found a 'semi' solution to the problem
5195 > though, that may would be good for your to add on the faq.
5196 >
5197 > If I send the notice " /OperServ Global <really long noitce>" That is when
5198 > the ":" (colon) will appear.
5199 >
5200 > HOWEVER, if I were to do "/msg OperServ Global <really long notice>" The
5201 > colon does not appear.
5202 >
5203 > So... it seems that when mIRC is pulling the alias for /operserv or
5204 > /chanserv it somehow creates this error. For anyone else out there that may
5205 > ever have this problem, until it is fixed just use /msg operserv to get
5206 > around it.
5207 >
5208 > Darvocet
5209 > EpicIRC.Net - irc.epicirc.net
5210 >
5211 >
5212 >
5213 > _____
5214 >
5215 > Hello... I have noticed a little error, and I just wanted to post here to
5216 > see if anyone had already posted regarding it, or if it was the first time.
5217 >
5218 > I run an IRC Network with Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.41
5219 >
5220 > When I send a global notice that is fairly long it appears that the
5221 > character ":" shows up in the notice. If I were to just sent a global
5222 > notice as an oper, Unreal would cut the message off before the ":" would
5223 > appear, so this only occurs with services.
5224 >
5225 > I have noticed it in Channel Join Notices, Network Connect Notices, and
5226 > Global Notices. Below is an example:
5227 >
5228 > -------------------------- Sending the notice with OperServ global
5229 > -------------------------
5230 >
5231 > [11:30pm] -Global- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a
5232 > major increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive
5233 > actions to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the
5234 > network. If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers
5235 > running :a scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please
5236 > join #Help and speak to an Oper. - XanaX, Sr. Network Admin.
5237 >
5238 > ------------------------ Sending the same notice as an oper, and not with
5239 > services -----------------------
5240 >
5241 > [11:32pm] -XanaX- [Network Notice] Our network has been experiencing a major
5242 > increase of unattended bots connecting. We are taking many defensive actions
5243 > to make sure that they do not interrupt the normal activity of the network.
5244 > If you receive a CTCP LAG, please ignore it, as it is our Opers running a
5245 > scan to detect malicious bots. If you have any questions, please join #Help
5246 > and spe
5247 > ....
5248 > ....
5249 >
5250 >
5251 >
5252 >
5253 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
5254 >
5255 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
5256 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5257 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5258 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Feb 21 11:14:28 2005
5259 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5260 Date: Sun Feb 20 18:14:52 2005
5261 Subject: FW: [IRCServices] Notice Bug (Update)
5262 In-Reply-To: <200502201734.j1KHXpur136694@pimout2-ext.prodigy.net>
5263 Message-ID: <42194416.03657@achurch.org>
5264
5265 >I have posted regarding this bug on the mIRC Bug Forums. They have verified
5266 >that it is infact happening. We have found a 'semi' solution to the problem
5267 >though, that may would be good for your to add on the faq.
5268
5269 Thanks, I've updated the FAQ.
5270
5271 --Andrew Church
5272 achurch@achurch.org
5273 http://achurch.org/
5274 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Feb 21 23:00:21 2005
5275 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5276 Date: Mon Feb 21 06:03:15 2005
5277 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.46 released
5278 Message-ID: <4219ea0c.56270@achurch.org>
5279
5280 Services 5.0.46 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
5281
5282 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
5283 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
5284
5285 a5d404925fbdabea7a2c06da5be91e1c ircservices-5.0.46.tar.gz
5286 7a9e50a99f4a51e82971297e83a07fad ircservices-5.0.46.diff.gz
5287 7a0c762a88592e519aff4a11f836043c ircservices-5.0.46-1.i386.rpm
5288 a2114a1dca4a08eaf2323fe022948bda ircservices_5.0.46-1_i386.deb
5289
5290 The mirrors should have it shortly.
5291
5292 I've added a PowerPC workaround for the GCC __builtin_* bugs (now
5293 also documented, see FAQ B.1.5) and fixed up a couple of other issues, so
5294 Services should now compile and run without problems on stock (but recent!)
5295 MacOS systems. I've done some rudimentary testing, but please let me know
5296 of any problems.
5297
5298 Changes in version 5.0.46
5299 -------------------------
5300 2005/02/21 Fixed some warnings during compilation.
5301 2005/02/21 Fixed bug causing modified files to not be recompiled
5302 properly when compiling with GNU make 3.79.
5303 2005/02/20 The OperServ debug command LISTUSERS now includes the IP
5304 address for each user before the user's mode string.
5305 2005/02/19 Added workaround for GCC bugs on PowerPC systems.
5306 2005/01/27 Fixed careless error in "make distclean". Reported by
5307 Stanislav Zahariev <sofit@evronet.tv>
5308
5309 --Andrew Church
5310 achurch@achurch.org
5311 http://achurch.org/
5312 From phan70m at gmail.com Tue Feb 22 08:43:57 2005
5313 From: phan70m at gmail.com (Anton Wolkov)
5314 Date: Tue Feb 22 08:44:09 2005
5315 Subject: [IRCServices] active channels may expire
5316 Message-ID: <d50f59a00502220843648500f3@mail.gmail.com>
5317
5318 hi,
5319 i have a channel for the idlerpg game ( http://nix.co.il/i ) which has
5320 only one registered user - the game bot.
5321 the point of the game is to have highest uptime and do nothing, and
5322 since our servers have decent uptime the bot doesn't reconnect for
5323 months.
5324 after it finally did i noticed channel had expired long ago, so now i
5325 set it to noexpire, but i'm pretty sure this isn't intentional
5326 behaviour.
5327 i would suggest checking in the expire script if channel has
5328 registered users with access present in the channel.
5329 thanks
5330 PHANTOm -- http://www.irc.nix.co.il/
5331 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Feb 23 01:56:57 2005
5332 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5333 Date: Tue Feb 22 09:01:48 2005
5334 Subject: [IRCServices] active channels may expire
5335 In-Reply-To: <d50f59a00502220843648500f3@mail.gmail.com>
5336 Message-ID: <421b6565.33265@achurch.org>
5337
5338 This is designed behavior--see section 3-2-1 of the manual--but I
5339 agree that it's non-obvious; the change you suggest seems harmless enough,
5340 so I'll implement it in the next release. Thanks for the suggestion.
5341
5342 --Andrew Church
5343 achurch@achurch.org
5344 http://achurch.org/
5345
5346 >hi,
5347 >i have a channel for the idlerpg game ( http://nix.co.il/i ) which has
5348 >only one registered user - the game bot.
5349 >the point of the game is to have highest uptime and do nothing, and
5350 >since our servers have decent uptime the bot doesn't reconnect for
5351 >months.
5352 >after it finally did i noticed channel had expired long ago, so now i
5353 >set it to noexpire, but i'm pretty sure this isn't intentional
5354 >behaviour.
5355 >i would suggest checking in the expire script if channel has
5356 >registered users with access present in the channel.
5357 >thanks
5358 >PHANTOm -- http://www.irc.nix.co.il/
5359 >------------------------------------------------------------------
5360 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5361 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5362 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Feb 23 03:36:04 2005
5363 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5364 Date: Tue Feb 22 10:36:59 2005
5365 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.47 released
5366 Message-ID: <421b7bc6.57136@achurch.org>
5367
5368 Services 5.0.47 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
5369
5370 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
5371 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
5372
5373 311d7525054954ca65b8a8856265c0c6 ircservices-5.0.47.tar.gz
5374 69327d6137101de03560adfdb4c3259d ircservices-5.0.47.diff.gz
5375 22ddcda6deeff28fb3cf277e342b9425 ircservices-5.0.47-1.i386.rpm
5376 916ab7a96f9bcf3958249c7281a48ceb ircservices_5.0.47-1_i386.deb
5377
5378 The mirrors should have it shortly.
5379
5380 This release is to implement the change suggested a little while ago
5381 regarding channel expiration; channels will no longer expire if at least
5382 one auto-op user is in the channel (and identified so that they have
5383 auto-op privileges). As a side effect, ChanServ INFO will now display the
5384 current time in the "last used" field if an auto-op user is in the channel.
5385 I have also added a new section to the documentation (section 3-2-3)
5386 detailing the rules for channel expiration, to hopefully avoid future
5387 confusion and/or spark debate on better ways to handle expiration.
5388
5389 Changes in version 5.0.47
5390 -------------------------
5391 2005/02/23 Channels no longer expire while an auto-op user is in the
5392 channel; expiration is delayed until the time specified
5393 by CSExpire after the last such user leaves the channel.
5394 Reported by Anton Wolkov <phan70m@gmail.com>
5395 2005/02/23 Added user IP addresses to the OperServ LISTUSER debug
5396 command as well.
5397
5398 --Andrew Church
5399 achurch@achurch.org
5400 http://achurch.org/
5401 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Feb 23 04:03:42 2005
5402 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
5403 Date: Tue Feb 22 11:06:02 2005
5404 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.48 released
5405 Message-ID: <421b8293.77227@achurch.org>
5406
5407 Services 5.0.48 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
5408
5409 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
5410 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
5411
5412 f61433fd50ad5d3833430511f5bbd0dd ircservices-5.0.48.tar.gz
5413 a41962598b609a2fa4827451e670cf57 ircservices-5.0.48.diff.gz
5414 875602f89506fba6847d7e9bb7ee1b07 ircservices-5.0.48-1.i386.rpm
5415 3c8cb7aa6ed5bb0af7bb8c5225a64207 ircservices_5.0.48-1_i386.deb
5416
5417 The mirrors should have it shortly.
5418
5419 5.0.47 has a careless error which can potentially cause Services to
5420 crash on exit or rehash of the configuration files, and which also
5421 demonstrates pretty clearly that I shouldn't be up coding at 3 in the
5422 morning... Apologies for the inconvenience.
5423
5424 Changes in version 5.0.48
5425 -------------------------
5426 2005/02/23 Fix careless bug leading to possible crash on exit or rehash.
5427
5428 --Andrew Church
5429 achurch@achurch.org
5430 http://achurch.org/
5431 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Wed Feb 23 06:28:48 2005
5432 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
5433 Date: Wed Feb 23 06:29:07 2005
5434 Subject: [IRCServices] HostServ module
5435 Message-ID: <000e01c519b3$ff4a0a90$044405d5@server>
5436
5437 Andrew is possible to be added to a next release of ircservices a simple (add,del,list) hostserv module?
5438 It will help very very very very ... much admins and we will not need to modify vhost.conf to all servers (or something like this) or running a neostats server to have vhosts.
5439
5440 BTW: Is anyone here who have any hostserv module to work with the 4.0.45 and above versions of ircservices??
5441 -------------- next part --------------
5442 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
5443 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050223/b565f95f/attachment.html
5444 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Feb 23 11:24:13 2005
5445 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
5446 Date: Wed Feb 23 11:24:28 2005
5447 Subject: [IRCServices] HostServ module
5448 In-Reply-To: <000e01c519b3$ff4a0a90$044405d5@server>
5449 References: <000e01c519b3$ff4a0a90$044405d5@server>
5450 Message-ID: <421CD85D.7060701@frostycoolslug.com>
5451
5452 Mine only works with the 5.0.x version of services, It's been around for
5453 quite some time, i'm surprised you havn't noticed it.
5454
5455 http://www.servicescommunity.za.net/viewtopic.php?p=168
5456
5457 That gives a link to the file, and installation instructions. I doubt
5458 Andy will include this in a future release of services though.
5459
5460 --
5461 Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5462
5463
5464 Dionisios K. wrote:
5465 > Andrew is possible to be added to a next release of ircservices a simple (add,del,list) hostserv module?
5466 > It will help very very very very ... much admins and we will not need to modify vhost.conf to all servers (or something like this) or running a neostats server to have vhosts.
5467 >
5468 > BTW: Is anyone here who have any hostserv module to work with the 4.0.45 and above versions of ircservices??
5469 >
5470 >
5471 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
5472 >
5473 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
5474 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5475 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5476
5477 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Feb 23 13:07:06 2005
5478 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
5479 Date: Wed Feb 23 13:07:13 2005
5480 Subject: [IRCServices] HostServ module
5481 Message-ID: <20050223210707.56758.qmail@web54402.mail.yahoo.com>
5482
5483 Thank you Craig. I hope this or something like this to
5484 be added officially to the services pack. Very nice
5485 thing.
5486 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
5487 <Craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
5488 > Mine only works with the 5.0.x version of services,
5489 It's been around for
5490 > quite some time, i'm surprised you havn't noticed
5491 it.
5492 >
5493 >
5494 http://www.servicescommunity.za.net/viewtopic.php?p=168
5495 >
5496 > That gives a link to the file, and installation
5497 instructions. I doubt
5498 > Andy will include this in a future release of
5499 services though.
5500 >
5501 > --
5502 > Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
5503 >
5504 >
5505 > Dionisios K. wrote:
5506 > > Andrew is possible to be added to a next release
5507 of ircservices a simple (add,del,list) hostserv
5508 module?
5509 > > It will help very very very very ... much admins
5510 and we will not need to modify vhost.conf to all
5511 servers (or something like this) or running a neostats
5512 server to have vhosts.
5513 > >
5514 > > BTW: Is anyone here who have any hostserv module
5515 to work with the 4.0.45 and above versions of
5516 ircservices??
5517 > >
5518 > >
5519 > >
5520 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
5521 > >
5522 > >
5523 ------------------------------------------------------------------
5524 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
5525 options, visit:
5526 > >
5527 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5528 >
5529 >
5530 ------------------------------------------------------------------
5531 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
5532 visit:
5533 >
5534 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5535 >
5536 >
5537 >
5538
5539
5540 =====
5541 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
5542 From florin at andrei.myip.org Mon Feb 28 17:15:11 2005
5543 From: florin at andrei.myip.org (Florin Andrei)
5544 Date: Mon Feb 28 17:15:43 2005
5545 Subject: [IRCServices] newbie kickstart document
5546 Message-ID: <1109639711.6629.57.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
5547
5548 Hi, i'm new to ircservices. I'm trying to use it together with Unreal as
5549 an instant messaging server for myself and my co-workers. We want to be
5550 able to register nicks, register channels, control access to channels,
5551 etc.
5552 I succeeded in doing preliminary configuration on Unreal and ircservices
5553 and getting them to work together. But it's not clear which road i
5554 should take from here to the goal stated above.
5555
5556 Do you guys happen to have a "newbie kickstart document" to speed up
5557 things for a newcomer? Essentially, how to bootstrap a small population
5558 of admins, create a few channels and assign access permissions and
5559 things like that.
5560 Do i have to login as SuperUser and create admins? If yes, then i should
5561 probably password-protect that nick pretty soon now, right?
5562
5563 Thanks,
5564
5565 --
5566 Florin Andrei
5567
5568 http://florin.myip.org/
5569
5570 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Mon Feb 28 22:55:14 2005
5571 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
5572 Date: Mon Feb 28 22:55:22 2005
5573 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
5574 Message-ID: <20050301065514.34948.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
5575
5576 on many ircds +R chmode is supported by now. I thing
5577 services should enforce it on 1st user joins the
5578 channel like +OA and +z on Unrealircd
5579
5580 =====
5581 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
5582 From medice at gmx.at Tue Mar 1 00:25:00 2005
5583 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
5584 Date: Tue Mar 1 00:24:27 2005
5585 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
5586 In-Reply-To: <20050301065514.34948.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
5587 References: <20050301065514.34948.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
5588 Message-ID: <422426DC.6060809@gmx.at>
5589
5590 I'd say keep this in user's decision. Since each of the mentioned modes
5591 means different settings you should not bind them together. Especially
5592 at +AO -since users capable of using those channelmodes (so called opers
5593 ;) ) should have sufficient knowledge about irc-stuff to decide by
5594 themselves if +R is mandatory or not (on my side I think it's not...)
5595 there are several seperate modes invented to produce numerous
5596 combinations of settings, just like a users likes it / thinks it's
5597 necessary....
5598
5599 just my 2 cents...
5600 medice
5601
5602 Dionisios K. wrote:
5603 > on many ircds +R chmode is supported by now. I thing
5604 > services should enforce it on 1st user joins the
5605 > channel like +OA and +z on Unrealircd
5606 >
5607 > =====
5608 > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
5609
5610 From lordbergee at comcast.net Tue Mar 1 08:32:55 2005
5611 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
5612 Date: Tue Mar 1 08:33:04 2005
5613 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
5614 In-Reply-To: <422426DC.6060809@gmx.at>
5615 References: <20050301065514.34948.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
5616 <422426DC.6060809@gmx.at>
5617 Message-ID: <42249937.7030009@comcast.net>
5618
5619 Either I've misunderstood you and Dionisios K. or I think he meant
5620 something different from what you're talking about. I think he is
5621 suggesting that IRCServices should treat +R like it treats +A or +O.
5622 That is to say, right now, if a channel is +O then IRCServices will kick
5623 anyone that joins the channel that is not a global IRCop. So what I
5624 took his suggestion to mean is that he wants IRCServices to kick the
5625 user out of the channel if they don't have a registered nickname and +R
5626 is set on the channel.
5627 If this is indeed what he is suggesting, then I would say that it might
5628 be worth considering. I guess that's useful really in two situations.
5629 First if a user is the first one to join a channel and +R is mode locked
5630 on, because the IRCd would then not enforce +R because of course the
5631 channel did not exist at the time. Secondly I suppose would be on syncs
5632 from netsplits where one side did not have +R and say some spam bots
5633 managed to get in on on a split server. I guess in general I think it
5634 is worth enforcing the mode simply for consistency in IRCServices since
5635 +A, +O and +z on Unreal are already enforced.
5636 And if this isn't what you meant Dionisios, then I suggest what I
5637 thought you meant. What does everyone else on the list think of that? :)
5638
5639 Bergee
5640
5641 Medice wrote:
5642 > I'd say keep this in user's decision. Since each of the mentioned modes
5643 > means different settings you should not bind them together. Especially
5644 > at +AO -since users capable of using those channelmodes (so called opers
5645 > ;) ) should have sufficient knowledge about irc-stuff to decide by
5646 > themselves if +R is mandatory or not (on my side I think it's not...)
5647 > there are several seperate modes invented to produce numerous
5648 > combinations of settings, just like a users likes it / thinks it's
5649 > necessary....
5650 >
5651 > just my 2 cents...
5652 > medice
5653 >
5654 > Dionisios K. wrote:
5655 >
5656 >> on many ircds +R chmode is supported by now. I thing
5657 >> services should enforce it on 1st user joins the
5658 >> channel like +OA and +z on Unrealircd
5659 >>
5660 >> =====
5661 >> Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
5662 From medice at gmx.at Tue Mar 1 09:11:30 2005
5663 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
5664 Date: Tue Mar 1 09:10:49 2005
5665 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
5666 In-Reply-To: <42249937.7030009@comcast.net>
5667 References: <20050301065514.34948.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com> <422426DC.6060809@gmx.at>
5668 <42249937.7030009@comcast.net>
5669 Message-ID: <4224A242.7030905@gmx.at>
5670
5671 hm - I guess I should have understand that thing the other way round
5672 just at the first turn...
5673 I think your right, I got that idea wrong...
5674 In this case it's totally different story and worth a close
5675 consideration in my opinion.
5676 Sorry for any bad mood, in fact I was surprised first, since Dionisios
5677 usually writes perfectly reasonable stuff to the maillist and now i got
5678 him wrong - sorry
5679
5680 greets Medice
5681
5682
5683 Bergee wrote:
5684 > Either I've misunderstood you and Dionisios K. or I think he meant
5685 > something different from what you're talking about. I think he is
5686 > suggesting that IRCServices should treat +R like it treats +A or +O.
5687 > That is to say, right now, if a channel is +O then IRCServices will kick
5688 > anyone that joins the channel that is not a global IRCop. So what I
5689 > took his suggestion to mean is that he wants IRCServices to kick the
5690 > user out of the channel if they don't have a registered nickname and +R
5691 > is set on the channel.
5692 > If this is indeed what he is suggesting, then I would say that it
5693 > might be worth considering. I guess that's useful really in two
5694 > situations. First if a user is the first one to join a channel and +R is
5695 > mode locked on, because the IRCd would then not enforce +R because of
5696 > course the channel did not exist at the time. Secondly I suppose would
5697 > be on syncs from netsplits where one side did not have +R and say some
5698 > spam bots managed to get in on on a split server. I guess in general I
5699 > think it is worth enforcing the mode simply for consistency in
5700 > IRCServices since +A, +O and +z on Unreal are already enforced.
5701 > And if this isn't what you meant Dionisios, then I suggest what I
5702 > thought you meant. What does everyone else on the list think of that? :)
5703 >
5704 > Bergee
5705 >
5706 From florin at andrei.myip.org Wed Mar 2 01:06:46 2005
5707 From: florin at andrei.myip.org (Florin Andrei)
5708 Date: Wed Mar 2 01:06:56 2005
5709 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
5710 Message-ID: <1109754406.5157.42.camel@rivendell.home.local>
5711
5712 I'm using Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.48 on Linux.
5713 I properly set the ServicesRoot variable, i joined as that nick,
5714 registered it, and now the nick is displayed by the webserver like this:
5715
5716 OperServ privilege level:Services super-user
5717
5718 However, when i'm the super-user and i'm trying to give admin privileges
5719 to another nick, i get this error:
5720
5721 operserv/main: Non-oper xyzk!abcd@xxx.yyy.com sent: ADMIN ADD mnopqr
5722
5723 What am i doing wrong?
5724
5725 --
5726 Florin Andrei
5727
5728 http://florin.myip.org/
5729
5730 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Mar 2 02:05:35 2005
5731 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
5732 Date: Wed Mar 2 02:05:57 2005
5733 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
5734 Message-ID: <20050302100535.65469.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com>
5735
5736 To use operserv you must oper-up on the ircd. Are u
5737 sure u were an ircop when u tried to add services
5738 admins?
5739 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
5740 <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
5741 > I'm using Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.48 on
5742 Linux.
5743 > I properly set the ServicesRoot variable, i joined
5744 as that nick,
5745 > registered it, and now the nick is displayed by the
5746 webserver like this:
5747 >
5748 > OperServ privilege level:Services super-user
5749 >
5750 > However, when i'm the super-user and i'm trying to
5751 give admin privileges
5752 > to another nick, i get this error:
5753 >
5754 > operserv/main: Non-oper xyzk!abcd@xxx.yyy.com sent:
5755 ADMIN ADD mnopqr
5756 >
5757 > What am i doing wrong?
5758 >
5759 > --
5760 > Florin Andrei
5761 >
5762 > http://florin.myip.org/
5763 >
5764 >
5765 ------------------------------------------------------------------
5766 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
5767 visit:
5768 >
5769 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5770
5771
5772 =====
5773 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
5774 From florin at andrei.myip.org Wed Mar 2 08:34:14 2005
5775 From: florin at andrei.myip.org (Florin Andrei)
5776 Date: Wed Mar 2 08:34:25 2005
5777 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
5778 In-Reply-To: <20050302100535.65469.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com>
5779 References: <20050302100535.65469.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com>
5780 Message-ID: <1109781254.5155.1.camel@rivendell.home.local>
5781
5782 I see what you mean. I believe i wasn't ircop. But here's probably a
5783 very newbie question - how do i become an ircop without being on a
5784 channel? "/op nick" doesn't work, the IRC server says "no such channel".
5785
5786 And in order to create channels, i have to become admin first, since
5787 ircservices won't let me otherwise. And that's the catch 22 at the
5788 moment.
5789
5790 On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 02:05 -0800, Dionisios K. wrote:
5791 > To use operserv you must oper-up on the ircd. Are u
5792 > sure u were an ircop when u tried to add services
5793 > admins?
5794 > --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
5795 > <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
5796 > > I'm using Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.48 on
5797 > Linux.
5798 > > I properly set the ServicesRoot variable, i joined
5799 > as that nick,
5800 > > registered it, and now the nick is displayed by the
5801 > webserver like this:
5802 > >
5803 > > OperServ privilege level:Services super-user
5804 > >
5805 > > However, when i'm the super-user and i'm trying to
5806 > give admin privileges
5807 > > to another nick, i get this error:
5808 > >
5809 > > operserv/main: Non-oper xyzk!abcd@xxx.yyy.com sent:
5810 > ADMIN ADD mnopqr
5811 > >
5812 > > What am i doing wrong?
5813 > >
5814 > > --
5815 > > Florin Andrei
5816 > >
5817 > > http://florin.myip.org/
5818 > >
5819 > >
5820 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
5821 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
5822 > visit:
5823 > >
5824 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5825 >
5826 >
5827 > =====
5828 > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
5829 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
5830 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5831 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5832 --
5833 Florin Andrei
5834
5835 http://florin.myip.org/
5836
5837 From list at psam.se Wed Mar 2 08:58:36 2005
5838 From: list at psam.se (list)
5839 Date: Wed Mar 2 08:59:05 2005
5840 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
5841 In-Reply-To: <1109781254.5155.1.camel@rivendell.home.local>
5842 References: <20050302100535.65469.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com>
5843 <1109781254.5155.1.camel@rivendell.home.local>
5844 Message-ID: <4225F0BC.6080300@psam.se>
5845
5846 First of all since you are using Unreal. Have you set yourself as oper
5847 to Unreal? This meaning have you setupo in the unrealircd.conf like this
5848
5849 oper bobsmith {
5850 class clients;
5851 from {
5852 userhost bob@smithco.com;
5853 };
5854 password "f00";
5855 flags
5856 {
5857 netadmin;
5858 can_zline;
5859 can_gzline;
5860 can_gkline;
5861 global;
5862 };
5863 };
5864
5865 You can set this oper in several ways look at the docs for UnrealIRCd
5866 at http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html and the FAQ at
5867 http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/faq/
5868
5869 Second of all have you set yourself up as ServiceRoot in the module.conf?
5870 # ServicesRoot <nick> [REQUIRED]
5871 # Specifies the Services "super-user". The super-user, or "root" as
5872 # in Unix terminology, is the only user who can add or delete
5873 # Services admins.
5874 #
5875 # This is commented out by default; make sure you insert the correct
5876 # nick before uncommenting it.
5877
5878 #ServicesRoot SuperUser
5879
5880 This will allow the user with this nick to have super-user access. Not
5881 sure if you have to register it but its a very good idea.
5882
5883 Now you should be able to add new admins to the server. If you want them
5884 to have access to the Unreal commands you need to add them in the way
5885 described above and in the docs.
5886
5887 As an unreal oper you can /mode #sol +o nick to get @ status in any channel.
5888
5889 If you havent commented out this
5890 CSEnableRegister
5891 in module.conf any user should be able to register a channel while they
5892 are @ in the channel
5893
5894 Psadi
5895
5896 Florin Andrei wrote:
5897
5898 >I see what you mean. I believe i wasn't ircop. But here's probably a
5899 >very newbie question - how do i become an ircop without being on a
5900 >channel? "/op nick" doesn't work, the IRC server says "no such channel".
5901 >
5902 >And in order to create channels, i have to become admin first, since
5903 >ircservices won't let me otherwise. And that's the catch 22 at the
5904 >moment.
5905 >
5906 >On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 02:05 -0800, Dionisios K. wrote:
5907 >
5908 >
5909 >>To use operserv you must oper-up on the ircd. Are u
5910 >>sure u were an ircop when u tried to add services
5911 >>admins?
5912 >>--- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
5913 >><florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
5914 >>
5915 >>
5916 >>>I'm using Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.48 on
5917 >>>
5918 >>>
5919 >>Linux.
5920 >>
5921 >>
5922 >>>I properly set the ServicesRoot variable, i joined
5923 >>>
5924 >>>
5925 >>as that nick,
5926 >>
5927 >>
5928 >>>registered it, and now the nick is displayed by the
5929 >>>
5930 >>>
5931 >>webserver like this:
5932 >>
5933 >>
5934 >>>OperServ privilege level:Services super-user
5935 >>>
5936 >>>However, when i'm the super-user and i'm trying to
5937 >>>
5938 >>>
5939 >>give admin privileges
5940 >>
5941 >>
5942 >>>to another nick, i get this error:
5943 >>>
5944 >>>operserv/main: Non-oper xyzk!abcd@xxx.yyy.com sent:
5945 >>>
5946 >>>
5947 >>ADMIN ADD mnopqr
5948 >>
5949 >>
5950 >>>What am i doing wrong?
5951 >>>
5952 >>>--
5953 >>>Florin Andrei
5954 >>>
5955 >>>http://florin.myip.org/
5956 >>>
5957 >>>
5958 >>>
5959 >>>
5960 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
5961 >>
5962 >>
5963 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
5964 >>>
5965 >>>
5966 >>visit:
5967 >>
5968 >>
5969 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5970 >>
5971 >>
5972 >>=====
5973 >>Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
5974 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
5975 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
5976 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
5977 >>
5978 >>
5979
5980
5981 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Wed Mar 2 09:56:52 2005
5982 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
5983 Date: Wed Mar 2 09:57:11 2005
5984 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
5985 Message-ID: <20050302175653.44028.qmail@web54404.mail.yahoo.com>
5986
5987 >From these ive read from ur email i can see that u
5988 dont know basic things (to be a services root) for
5989 services&ircds. My opinion is that u should read the
5990 manuals and documents for these things first and then
5991 if u have problems or questions send an email here
5992 again. Everyone here will be happy to help u.
5993 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
5994 <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
5995 > I see what you mean. I believe i wasn't ircop. But
5996 here's probably a
5997 > very newbie question - how do i become an ircop
5998 without being on a
5999 > channel? "/op nick" doesn't work, the IRC server
6000 says "no such channel".
6001 >
6002 > And in order to create channels, i have to become
6003 admin first, since
6004 > ircservices won't let me otherwise. And that's the
6005 catch 22 at the
6006 > moment.
6007 >
6008 > On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 02:05 -0800, Dionisios K.
6009 wrote:
6010 > > To use operserv you must oper-up on the ircd. Are
6011 u
6012 > > sure u were an ircop when u tried to add services
6013 > > admins?
6014 > > --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
6015 > > <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
6016 > > > I'm using Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.48 on
6017 > > Linux.
6018 > > > I properly set the ServicesRoot variable, i
6019 joined
6020 > > as that nick,
6021 > > > registered it, and now the nick is displayed by
6022 the
6023 > > webserver like this:
6024 > > >
6025 > > > OperServ privilege level:Services super-user
6026 > > >
6027 > > > However, when i'm the super-user and i'm trying
6028 to
6029 > > give admin privileges
6030 > > > to another nick, i get this error:
6031 > > >
6032 > > > operserv/main: Non-oper xyzk!abcd@xxx.yyy.com
6033 sent:
6034 > > ADMIN ADD mnopqr
6035 > > >
6036 > > > What am i doing wrong?
6037 > > >
6038 > > > --
6039 > > > Florin Andrei
6040 > > >
6041 > > > http://florin.myip.org/
6042 > > >
6043 > > >
6044 > >
6045 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6046 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
6047 options,
6048 > > visit:
6049 > > >
6050 > >
6051 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6052 > >
6053 > >
6054 > > =====
6055 > > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
6056 > >
6057 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6058 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
6059 options, visit:
6060 > >
6061 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6062 > --
6063 > Florin Andrei
6064 >
6065 > http://florin.myip.org/
6066 >
6067 >
6068 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6069 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
6070 visit:
6071 >
6072 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6073
6074
6075 =====
6076 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
6077 From florin at andrei.myip.org Wed Mar 2 12:17:32 2005
6078 From: florin at andrei.myip.org (Florin Andrei)
6079 Date: Wed Mar 2 12:17:45 2005
6080 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
6081 In-Reply-To: <4225F0BC.6080300@psam.se>
6082 References: <20050302100535.65469.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com>
6083 <1109781254.5155.1.camel@rivendell.home.local>
6084 <4225F0BC.6080300@psam.se>
6085 Message-ID: <1109794652.5199.18.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
6086
6087 On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 17:58 +0100, list wrote:
6088 > First of all since you are using Unreal. Have you set yourself as oper
6089 > to Unreal? This meaning have you setupo in the unrealircd.conf like this
6090 >
6091 > oper bobsmith {
6092 > class clients;
6093
6094 no
6095
6096 So now you know what my problem was. :-)
6097
6098 > Second of all have you set yourself up as ServiceRoot in the module.conf?
6099 > # ServicesRoot <nick> [REQUIRED]
6100
6101 yes
6102
6103 I changed unrealircd.conf accordingly, now everything is fine, i can set
6104 admins, create channels, tweak access modes, pretty much everything
6105 seems to be fine (at least on surface).
6106
6107 The stumbling block for me was that some kind of "elevated
6108 privileges" (oper) are also required on Unreal, not just on ircservices.
6109 I was thinking that ircservices alone takes care of all that (i thought
6110 ircservices is simply an extension to the IRC server per se, while in
6111 truth they are two different layers with large parts of the
6112 functionality separated).
6113 I think i understand it now - at least i am able to perform the basic
6114 work i was looking to accomplish.
6115
6116 Thank you!
6117
6118 --
6119 Florin Andrei
6120
6121 http://florin.myip.org/
6122
6123 From scousens at fibertel.com.ar Wed Mar 2 13:04:25 2005
6124 From: scousens at fibertel.com.ar (Sergio Cousens)
6125 Date: Wed Mar 2 13:09:13 2005
6126 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
6127 In-Reply-To: <20050302175653.44028.qmail@web54404.mail.yahoo.com>
6128 Message-ID: <000c01c51f6b$6a87e5e0$1e01a8c0@COUSENSPDC>
6129
6130 He is probably a newbie, but I think that I can help!
6131
6132 /oper nick password
6133
6134
6135 This nick should exist at the oper block in unrealircd.conf.
6136
6137 Hope this helps!
6138
6139
6140 -----Mensaje original-----
6141 De: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
6142 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] En nombre de Dionisios K.
6143 Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 02 de marzo de 2005 14:57
6144 Para: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
6145 Asunto: Re: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
6146
6147 >From these ive read from ur email i can see that u
6148 dont know basic things (to be a services root) for
6149 services&ircds. My opinion is that u should read the
6150 manuals and documents for these things first and then
6151 if u have problems or questions send an email here
6152 again. Everyone here will be happy to help u.
6153 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
6154 <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
6155 > I see what you mean. I believe i wasn't ircop. But
6156 here's probably a
6157 > very newbie question - how do i become an ircop
6158 without being on a
6159 > channel? "/op nick" doesn't work, the IRC server
6160 says "no such channel".
6161 >
6162 > And in order to create channels, i have to become
6163 admin first, since
6164 > ircservices won't let me otherwise. And that's the
6165 catch 22 at the
6166 > moment.
6167 >
6168 > On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 02:05 -0800, Dionisios K.
6169 wrote:
6170 > > To use operserv you must oper-up on the ircd. Are
6171 u
6172 > > sure u were an ircop when u tried to add services
6173 > > admins?
6174 > > --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
6175 > > <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
6176 > > > I'm using Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.48 on
6177 > > Linux.
6178 > > > I properly set the ServicesRoot variable, i
6179 joined
6180 > > as that nick,
6181 > > > registered it, and now the nick is displayed by
6182 the
6183 > > webserver like this:
6184 > > >
6185 > > > OperServ privilege level:Services super-user
6186 > > >
6187 > > > However, when i'm the super-user and i'm trying
6188 to
6189 > > give admin privileges
6190 > > > to another nick, i get this error:
6191 > > >
6192 > > > operserv/main: Non-oper xyzk!abcd@xxx.yyy.com
6193 sent:
6194 > > ADMIN ADD mnopqr
6195 > > >
6196 > > > What am i doing wrong?
6197 > > >
6198 > > > --
6199 > > > Florin Andrei
6200 > > >
6201 > > > http://florin.myip.org/
6202 > > >
6203 > > >
6204 > >
6205 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6206 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
6207 options,
6208 > > visit:
6209 > > >
6210 > >
6211 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6212 > >
6213 > >
6214 > > =====
6215 > > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
6216 > >
6217 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6218 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
6219 options, visit:
6220 > >
6221 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6222 > --
6223 > Florin Andrei
6224 >
6225 > http://florin.myip.org/
6226 >
6227 >
6228 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6229 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
6230 visit:
6231 >
6232 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6233
6234
6235 =====
6236 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
6237 ------------------------------------------------------------------
6238 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6239 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6240
6241 From florin at andrei.myip.org Wed Mar 2 13:50:46 2005
6242 From: florin at andrei.myip.org (Florin Andrei)
6243 Date: Wed Mar 2 13:51:00 2005
6244 Subject: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
6245 In-Reply-To: <000c01c51f6b$6a87e5e0$1e01a8c0@COUSENSPDC>
6246 References: <000c01c51f6b$6a87e5e0$1e01a8c0@COUSENSPDC>
6247 Message-ID: <1109800246.5199.37.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
6248
6249 yup, that was it, thanks!
6250
6251 (yes, i am a newbie)
6252
6253 On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 18:04 -0300, Sergio Cousens wrote:
6254 > He is probably a newbie, but I think that I can help!
6255 >
6256 > /oper nick password
6257 >
6258 >
6259 > This nick should exist at the oper block in unrealircd.conf.
6260 >
6261 > Hope this helps!
6262 >
6263 >
6264 > -----Mensaje original-----
6265 > De: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
6266 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net] En nombre de Dionisios K.
6267 > Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 02 de marzo de 2005 14:57
6268 > Para: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
6269 > Asunto: Re: [IRCServices] problem while creating admins
6270 >
6271 > >From these ive read from ur email i can see that u
6272 > dont know basic things (to be a services root) for
6273 > services&ircds. My opinion is that u should read the
6274 > manuals and documents for these things first and then
6275 > if u have problems or questions send an email here
6276 > again. Everyone here will be happy to help u.
6277 > --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
6278 > <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
6279 > > I see what you mean. I believe i wasn't ircop. But
6280 > here's probably a
6281 > > very newbie question - how do i become an ircop
6282 > without being on a
6283 > > channel? "/op nick" doesn't work, the IRC server
6284 > says "no such channel".
6285 > >
6286 > > And in order to create channels, i have to become
6287 > admin first, since
6288 > > ircservices won't let me otherwise. And that's the
6289 > catch 22 at the
6290 > > moment.
6291 > >
6292 > > On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 02:05 -0800, Dionisios K.
6293 > wrote:
6294 > > > To use operserv you must oper-up on the ircd. Are
6295 > u
6296 > > > sure u were an ircop when u tried to add services
6297 > > > admins?
6298 > > > --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
6299 > > > <florin@andrei.myip.org> wrote:
6300 > > > > I'm using Unreal3.2.2b and ircservices-5.0.48 on
6301 > > > Linux.
6302 > > > > I properly set the ServicesRoot variable, i
6303 > joined
6304 > > > as that nick,
6305 > > > > registered it, and now the nick is displayed by
6306 > the
6307 > > > webserver like this:
6308 > > > >
6309 > > > > OperServ privilege level:Services super-user
6310 > > > >
6311 > > > > However, when i'm the super-user and i'm trying
6312 > to
6313 > > > give admin privileges
6314 > > > > to another nick, i get this error:
6315 > > > >
6316 > > > > operserv/main: Non-oper xyzk!abcd@xxx.yyy.com
6317 > sent:
6318 > > > ADMIN ADD mnopqr
6319 > > > >
6320 > > > > What am i doing wrong?
6321 > > > >
6322 > > > > --
6323 > > > > Florin Andrei
6324 > > > >
6325 > > > > http://florin.myip.org/
6326 > > > >
6327 > > > >
6328 > > >
6329 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6330 > > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
6331 > options,
6332 > > > visit:
6333 > > > >
6334 > > >
6335 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6336 > > >
6337 > > >
6338 > > > =====
6339 > > > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
6340 > > >
6341 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6342 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
6343 > options, visit:
6344 > > >
6345 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6346 > > --
6347 > > Florin Andrei
6348 > >
6349 > > http://florin.myip.org/
6350 > >
6351 > >
6352 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6353 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
6354 > visit:
6355 > >
6356 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6357 >
6358 >
6359 > =====
6360 > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
6361 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6362 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6363 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6364 >
6365 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6366 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6367 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6368 --
6369 Florin Andrei
6370
6371 http://florin.myip.org/
6372
6373 From florin at andrei.myip.org Wed Mar 2 16:00:18 2005
6374 From: florin at andrei.myip.org (Florin Andrei)
6375 Date: Wed Mar 2 16:00:36 2005
6376 Subject: [IRCServices] SET RESTRICTED
6377 Message-ID: <1109808018.5199.46.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
6378
6379 Is there a way to prevent unidentified users to use a channel but
6380 without banning them? Essentially, i'm looking for SET RESTRICTED but
6381 without the ban. I don't need the ban, since the potential for abuse is
6382 small (private network).
6383 Or is there a way to automatically unban them immediately thereafter?
6384
6385 --
6386 Florin Andrei
6387
6388 http://florin.myip.org/
6389
6390 From dnb at majestic-liaisons.com Wed Mar 2 16:10:06 2005
6391 From: dnb at majestic-liaisons.com (DeadNotBuried)
6392 Date: Wed Mar 2 16:10:41 2005
6393 Subject: [IRCServices] SET RESTRICTED
6394 References: <1109808018.5199.46.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
6395 Message-ID: <000701c51f85$5e187620$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
6396
6397 check the IRCd you are using for a +R channel mode
6398 on most IRCd's that will stop anyone that is not identified from joining the
6399 channel it is set on.
6400
6401 ----- Original Message -----
6402 From: "Florin Andrei" <florin@andrei.myip.org>
6403 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
6404 Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 10:30 AM
6405 Subject: [IRCServices] SET RESTRICTED
6406
6407
6408 > Is there a way to prevent unidentified users to use a channel but
6409 > without banning them? Essentially, i'm looking for SET RESTRICTED but
6410 > without the ban. I don't need the ban, since the potential for abuse is
6411 > small (private network).
6412 > Or is there a way to automatically unban them immediately thereafter?
6413 >
6414 > --
6415 > Florin Andrei
6416 >
6417 > http://florin.myip.org/
6418 >
6419 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6420 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6421 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6422 >
6423 >
6424
6425
6426 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 3 09:24:41 2005
6427 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6428 Date: Wed Mar 2 16:25:09 2005
6429 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
6430 In-Reply-To: <20050301065514.34948.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
6431 Message-ID: <42265959.50464@msgid.achurch.org>
6432
6433 >on many ircds +R chmode is supported by now. I thing
6434 >services should enforce it on 1st user joins the
6435 >channel like +OA and +z on Unrealircd
6436
6437 Good point, I'll fix it for the next version.
6438
6439 --Andrew Church
6440 achurch@achurch.org
6441 http://achurch.org/
6442 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Thu Mar 3 10:13:42 2005
6443 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
6444 Date: Thu Mar 3 10:14:40 2005
6445 Subject: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) - not
6446 recognised by Services
6447 Message-ID: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net>
6448
6449 The next UnrealIRCd version (3.2.3) will feature two new channel modes: +I
6450 (invex) and +j (join throttling). They're already in CVS, for those interested.
6451 However, it seems that Services doesn't support them.
6452
6453 The reasons for coming to this conclusion are as follows:
6454 - Couldn't find anything relating to these two modes in protocol/unreal.c
6455 (although I will admit, what I know about C is dangerous)
6456 - Trying to use ChanServ MLOCK on them returned an "unknown mode char" error
6457 - OperServ CLEARMODES failed to remove them if set
6458
6459 (Version 5.0.48 of Services was used.)
6460
6461 Some technical information regarding these modes: according to Unreal's 005
6462 numeric, +I is a mode that adds a nick!user@host mask to a list (like +b and
6463 +e, which should automatically imply that it shouldn't be MLOCKed), while +j
6464 requires a parameter to be set but doesn't require a parameter to be unset; +l
6465 works the same way. The syntax for +j is "+j joins:seconds".
6466
6467 As I'm expecting Unreal3.2.3 to be released sometime within the next two weeks,
6468 this should be sorted out pretty quickly (ie before it gets released.)
6469 ______________________________________________________________
6470 http://www.webmail.co.za the South African FREE email service
6471 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Mar 3 10:47:24 2005
6472 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
6473 Date: Thu Mar 3 10:47:21 2005
6474 Subject: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) - not
6475 recognised by Services
6476 In-Reply-To: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net>
6477 References: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net>
6478 Message-ID: <42275BBC.3050907@winbot.co.uk>
6479
6480 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6481 Hash: SHA1
6482
6483 why is +j even required??? +f does this!
6484
6485 Kieron Thwaites wrote:
6486 > The next UnrealIRCd version (3.2.3) will feature two new channel modes: +I
6487 > (invex) and +j (join throttling). They're already in CVS, for those interested.
6488 > However, it seems that Services doesn't support them.
6489 >
6490 > The reasons for coming to this conclusion are as follows:
6491 > - Couldn't find anything relating to these two modes in protocol/unreal.c
6492 > (although I will admit, what I know about C is dangerous)
6493 > - Trying to use ChanServ MLOCK on them returned an "unknown mode char" error
6494 > - OperServ CLEARMODES failed to remove them if set
6495 >
6496 > (Version 5.0.48 of Services was used.)
6497 >
6498 > Some technical information regarding these modes: according to Unreal's 005
6499 > numeric, +I is a mode that adds a nick!user@host mask to a list (like +b and
6500 > +e, which should automatically imply that it shouldn't be MLOCKed), while +j
6501 > requires a parameter to be set but doesn't require a parameter to be unset; +l
6502 > works the same way. The syntax for +j is "+j joins:seconds".
6503 >
6504 > As I'm expecting Unreal3.2.3 to be released sometime within the next two weeks,
6505 > this should be sorted out pretty quickly (ie before it gets released.)
6506 > ______________________________________________________________
6507 > http://www.webmail.co.za the South African FREE email service
6508 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6509 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6510 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6511 >
6512 >
6513
6514 - --
6515 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
6516 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
6517 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
6518 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
6519 - --
6520 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
6521 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
6522
6523 iD8DBQFCJ1u80k42Wxli/BARAtJzAJ9ud+2EqjxLxr2nSvhzU7tKrSRpowCfQMnR
6524 mMuzWrZsrjPUaU9NVelN6ic=
6525 =9y5+
6526 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
6527 From lordbergee at comcast.net Thu Mar 3 10:58:54 2005
6528 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
6529 Date: Thu Mar 3 10:58:59 2005
6530 Subject: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) - not
6531 recognised by Services
6532 In-Reply-To: <42275BBC.3050907@winbot.co.uk>
6533 References: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net> <42275BBC.3050907@winbot.co.uk>
6534 Message-ID: <42275E6E.2070203@comcast.net>
6535
6536 Actually my understanding of it is that +j reacts to x joins per user
6537 per y seconds. And what +f does is x joins per channel per y seconds.
6538 A slight difference at best, but it would basically allow you to
6539 throttle a single user a bit sooner rather than having to wait for that
6540 user to trigger a higher limit for the entire channel.
6541
6542 Bergee
6543
6544 Craig Edwards wrote:
6545 > why is +j even required??? +f does this!
6546 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Thu Mar 3 11:50:32 2005
6547 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
6548 Date: Thu Mar 3 11:49:19 2005
6549 Subject: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) -
6550 notrecognised by Services
6551 References: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net> <42275BBC.3050907@winbot.co.uk>
6552 <42275E6E.2070203@comcast.net>
6553 Message-ID: <001501c5202a$4291e4e0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
6554
6555 I thought chanmode +f was flood protection.
6556
6557 f * <lines:seconds> Flood protection, if the * is given a user will
6558 kick banned when they send <lines:seconds> if no * they are just kicked
6559
6560
6561 ----- Original Message -----
6562 From: "Bergee" <lordbergee@comcast.net>
6563 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
6564 Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:58 PM
6565 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) -
6566 notrecognised by Services
6567
6568
6569 > Actually my understanding of it is that +j reacts to x joins per user
6570 > per y seconds. And what +f does is x joins per channel per y seconds.
6571 > A slight difference at best, but it would basically allow you to
6572 > throttle a single user a bit sooner rather than having to wait for that
6573 > user to trigger a higher limit for the entire channel.
6574 >
6575 > Bergee
6576 >
6577 > Craig Edwards wrote:
6578 > > why is +j even required??? +f does this!
6579 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6580 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6581 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6582
6583 From lordbergee at comcast.net Thu Mar 3 11:56:25 2005
6584 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
6585 Date: Thu Mar 3 11:56:33 2005
6586 Subject: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j)
6587 - notrecognised by Services
6588 In-Reply-To: <001501c5202a$4291e4e0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
6589 References: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net>
6590 <42275BBC.3050907@winbot.co.uk> <42275E6E.2070203@comcast.net>
6591 <001501c5202a$4291e4e0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
6592 Message-ID: <42276BE9.2000108@comcast.net>
6593
6594 It used to be like that, and that feature still exists as a subset of
6595 what the +f mode is now. But rather than having a whole discussion
6596 about Unreal's various modes on the mailing list, I'll just point you to
6597 the documentation, which will hopefully clear up any confusion about
6598 what mode +f does now.
6599
6600 See: http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html#feature_antiflood
6601
6602 Bergee
6603
6604 Luniz wrote:
6605 > I thought chanmode +f was flood protection.
6606 >
6607 > f * <lines:seconds> Flood protection, if the * is given a user will
6608 > kick banned when they send <lines:seconds> if no * they are just kicked
6609 >
6610 > ----- Original Message -----
6611 > From: "Bergee" <lordbergee@comcast.net>
6612 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
6613 > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:58 PM
6614 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) -
6615 > notrecognised by Services
6616 >
6617 >>Actually my understanding of it is that +j reacts to x joins per user
6618 >>per y seconds. And what +f does is x joins per channel per y seconds.
6619 >>A slight difference at best, but it would basically allow you to
6620 >>throttle a single user a bit sooner rather than having to wait for that
6621 >>user to trigger a higher limit for the entire channel.
6622 >>
6623 >>Bergee
6624 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Thu Mar 3 12:07:01 2005
6625 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
6626 Date: Thu Mar 3 12:05:50 2005
6627 Subject: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and
6628 +j)- notrecognised by Services
6629 References: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net><42275BBC.3050907@winbot.co.uk> <42275E6E.2070203@comcast.net><001501c5202a$4291e4e0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
6630 <42276BE9.2000108@comcast.net>
6631 Message-ID: <002101c5202c$903eece0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
6632
6633 Well excuse me. Then there is no need for +j. End of discussion. Next
6634 thread.
6635
6636 ----- Original Message -----
6637 From: "Bergee" <lordbergee@comcast.net>
6638 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
6639 Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:56 PM
6640 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j)-
6641 notrecognised by Services
6642
6643
6644 > It used to be like that, and that feature still exists as a subset of
6645 > what the +f mode is now. But rather than having a whole discussion
6646 > about Unreal's various modes on the mailing list, I'll just point you to
6647 > the documentation, which will hopefully clear up any confusion about
6648 > what mode +f does now.
6649 >
6650 > See:
6651 http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html#feature_antiflood
6652 >
6653 > Bergee
6654 >
6655 > Luniz wrote:
6656 > > I thought chanmode +f was flood protection.
6657 > >
6658 > > f * <lines:seconds> Flood protection, if the * is given a user
6659 will
6660 > > kick banned when they send <lines:seconds> if no * they are just kicked
6661 > >
6662 > > ----- Original Message -----
6663 > > From: "Bergee" <lordbergee@comcast.net>
6664 > > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List"
6665 <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
6666 > > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:58 PM
6667 > > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) -
6668 > > notrecognised by Services
6669 > >
6670 > >>Actually my understanding of it is that +j reacts to x joins per user
6671 > >>per y seconds. And what +f does is x joins per channel per y seconds.
6672 > >>A slight difference at best, but it would basically allow you to
6673 > >>throttle a single user a bit sooner rather than having to wait for that
6674 > >>user to trigger a higher limit for the entire channel.
6675 > >>
6676 > >>Bergee
6677 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6678 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6679 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6680
6681 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Mar 4 11:57:26 2005
6682 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6683 Date: Thu Mar 3 18:58:18 2005
6684 Subject: [IRCServices] New UnrealIRCd channel modes (+I and +j) - not
6685 recognised by Services
6686 In-Reply-To: <web-659859929@mail01.infosat.net>
6687 Message-ID: <4227cebf.51450@msgid.achurch.org>
6688
6689 >The next UnrealIRCd version (3.2.3) will feature two new channel modes: +I
6690 >(invex) and +j (join throttling). They're already in CVS, for those interested.
6691 >However, it seems that Services doesn't support them.
6692
6693 Given that they're not even in an official Unreal release yet, this
6694 shouldn't be surprising...
6695
6696 I'll look into adding support for the next release.
6697
6698 --Andrew Church
6699 achurch@achurch.org
6700 http://achurch.org/
6701 From tty at inbox.ru Thu Mar 3 22:44:44 2005
6702 From: tty at inbox.ru (Alex HangMan)
6703 Date: Thu Mar 3 22:44:51 2005
6704 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal with NICKCHARS support (from CVS)
6705 Message-ID: <E1D76YG-000IGd-00.tty-inbox-ru@f19.mail.ru>
6706
6707 Hello all
6708
6709 seem like Services does not start with new Unreal build, that support NICKCHARS feature.
6710 here is services log:
6711 -------
6712 [Mar 04 10:58:09.431373 2005] debug: Sent: PROTOCTL SJOIN SJOIN2 SJ3 NICKv2 VHP VL NOQUIT UMODE2 TOKEN NICKIP
6713 [Mar 04 10:58:09.433700 2005] debug: Sent: PASS :**********
6714
6715 ... more sends, SERVER, NICK other ...
6716
6717 [Mar 04 10:58:09.458010 2005] debug: Received: :irc.nwg-nv.ru NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname...
6718 [Mar 04 10:58:09.460022 2005] debug: Received: :irc.nwg-nv.ru NOTICE AUTH :*** Found your hostname (cached)
6719 [Mar 04 10:58:09.531932 2005] debug: Received: PROTOCTL NICKCHARS=
6720 [Mar 04 10:58:09.540767 2005] debug: Sent: ERROR :Need NICKv2 protocol
6721 [Mar 04 10:58:09.543939 2005] Remote server doesn't support NICKv2
6722 -------
6723
6724 and code from Unreal sources (send_proto procedure, s_serv file):
6725 -------
6726 void send_proto(aClient *cptr, ConfigItem_link *aconf)
6727 {
6728 char buf[512];
6729
6730 sendto_one(cptr, "PROTOCTL NICKCHARS=%s", langsinuse);
6731
6732 sprintf(buf, "CHANMODES=%s%s,%s%s,%s%s,%s%s",
6733 CHPAR1, EXPAR1, CHPAR2, EXPAR2, CHPAR3, EXPAR3, CHPAR4, EXPAR4);
6734 #ifdef ZIP_LINKS
6735 if (aconf->options & CONNECT_ZIP)
6736 {
6737 sendto_one(cptr, "PROTOCTL %s ZIP %s", PROTOCTL_SERVER, buf);
6738 } else {
6739 #endif
6740 sendto_one(cptr, "PROTOCTL %s %s", PROTOCTL_SERVER, buf);
6741 #ifdef ZIP_LINKS
6742 }
6743 #endif
6744 }
6745 ... more code ...
6746 -------
6747
6748 Server always send first PROTOCTL NICKCHARS, therefor services crashed to start.
6749
6750 I just tested, moved NICKCHARS after "normal" PROTOCTL... and services doesn`t start again, it crashed on PROTOCTL NICKCHARS, because no NICKv2 in this PROTOCTL directive.
6751
6752
6753 And one question: when Services will support other languages, russian for example. In current version Services are case sensitive with cyrillic chars.
6754
6755 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu Mar 3 23:57:45 2005
6756 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
6757 Date: Thu Mar 3 23:57:48 2005
6758 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal with NICKCHARS support (from CVS)
6759 In-Reply-To: <E1D76YG-000IGd-00.tty-inbox-ru@f19.mail.ru>
6760 References: <E1D76YG-000IGd-00.tty-inbox-ru@f19.mail.ru>
6761 Message-ID: <422814F9.7030703@frostycoolslug.com>
6762
6763 Can i remind you that Unreal3.2.3 isn't officially released yet, your
6764 choice to use a currently not complete CVS version is your own.
6765
6766 Services support for this will come in time, when Andy is ready
6767 (probably when 3.2.3 is finally released, and the featureset finalised).
6768
6769 But don't expect Services to support CVS builds untill then (A _LOT_ of
6770 things can change, if andy releases a version of services now, and
6771 'NICKCHARS', or one of the other features gets removed for whatever
6772 reason, that means another release of services.
6773
6774 Also, pre-emptive support for Unreals new protocols _may_ break the
6775 support for the current official release, which is ill-advised imo.
6776
6777 Alex HangMan wrote:
6778 > Hello all
6779 >
6780 > seem like Services does not start with new Unreal build, that support NICKCHARS feature.
6781 > here is services log:
6782 > -------
6783 > [Mar 04 10:58:09.431373 2005] debug: Sent: PROTOCTL SJOIN SJOIN2 SJ3 NICKv2 VHP VL NOQUIT UMODE2 TOKEN NICKIP
6784 > [Mar 04 10:58:09.433700 2005] debug: Sent: PASS :**********
6785 >
6786 > ... more sends, SERVER, NICK other ...
6787 >
6788 > [Mar 04 10:58:09.458010 2005] debug: Received: :irc.nwg-nv.ru NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname...
6789 > [Mar 04 10:58:09.460022 2005] debug: Received: :irc.nwg-nv.ru NOTICE AUTH :*** Found your hostname (cached)
6790 > [Mar 04 10:58:09.531932 2005] debug: Received: PROTOCTL NICKCHARS=
6791 > [Mar 04 10:58:09.540767 2005] debug: Sent: ERROR :Need NICKv2 protocol
6792 > [Mar 04 10:58:09.543939 2005] Remote server doesn't support NICKv2
6793 > -------
6794 >
6795 > and code from Unreal sources (send_proto procedure, s_serv file):
6796 > -------
6797 > void send_proto(aClient *cptr, ConfigItem_link *aconf)
6798 > {
6799 > char buf[512];
6800 >
6801 > sendto_one(cptr, "PROTOCTL NICKCHARS=%s", langsinuse);
6802 >
6803 > sprintf(buf, "CHANMODES=%s%s,%s%s,%s%s,%s%s",
6804 > CHPAR1, EXPAR1, CHPAR2, EXPAR2, CHPAR3, EXPAR3, CHPAR4, EXPAR4);
6805 > #ifdef ZIP_LINKS
6806 > if (aconf->options & CONNECT_ZIP)
6807 > {
6808 > sendto_one(cptr, "PROTOCTL %s ZIP %s", PROTOCTL_SERVER, buf);
6809 > } else {
6810 > #endif
6811 > sendto_one(cptr, "PROTOCTL %s %s", PROTOCTL_SERVER, buf);
6812 > #ifdef ZIP_LINKS
6813 > }
6814 > #endif
6815 > }
6816 > ... more code ...
6817 > -------
6818 >
6819 > Server always send first PROTOCTL NICKCHARS, therefor services crashed to start.
6820 >
6821 > I just tested, moved NICKCHARS after "normal" PROTOCTL... and services doesn`t start again, it crashed on PROTOCTL NICKCHARS, because no NICKv2 in this PROTOCTL directive.
6822 >
6823 >
6824 > And one question: when Services will support other languages, russian for example. In current version Services are case sensitive with cyrillic chars.
6825 >
6826 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6827 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6828 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6829 >
6830 >
6831
6832 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Mar 4 18:01:02 2005
6833 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
6834 Date: Fri Mar 4 01:03:42 2005
6835 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal with NICKCHARS support (from CVS)
6836 In-Reply-To: <422814F9.7030703@frostycoolslug.com>
6837 Message-ID: <42282467.54036@msgid.achurch.org>
6838
6839 >> seem like Services does not start with new Unreal build, that support NICKCHARS feature.
6840
6841 This is not in any released version of Unreal. I will consider it if
6842 and when it appears in a release.
6843
6844 >> And one question: when Services will support other languages, russian for example. In current version Services are case sensitive with cyrillic chars.
6845
6846 Probably never, unless someone updates RFC1459 with an official
6847 standard on non-ASCII characters.
6848
6849 --Andrew Church
6850 achurch@achurch.org
6851 http://achurch.org/
6852 From holger.baust at freenet-ag.de Fri Mar 4 02:01:06 2005
6853 From: holger.baust at freenet-ag.de (Holger Baust)
6854 Date: Fri Mar 4 02:01:35 2005
6855 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal with NICKCHARS support (from CVS)
6856 In-Reply-To: <42282467.54036@msgid.achurch.org>
6857 References: <422814F9.7030703@frostycoolslug.com>
6858 <42282467.54036@msgid.achurch.org>
6859 Message-ID: <20050304100106.GA25510@freenet-ag.de>
6860
6861 Hi!
6862
6863 On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:01:02PM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
6864 > >> And one question: when Services will support other languages,
6865 > >> russian for example. In current version Services are case sensitive
6866 > >> with cyrillic chars.
6867 >
6868 > Probably never, unless someone updates RFC1459 with an official
6869 > standard on non-ASCII characters.
6870 There are updates to RFC1459. Check the RFCs 2810, 2811, 2812 and 2813.
6871 The paragraph about Character Codes are the same in RFC1459 and RFC2812.
6872
6873 Regards,
6874 Holger Baust
6875
6876 --
6877 Holger Baust Holger.Baust@freenet-ag.de
6878 freenet.de AG Tel.: +49 211 53087 0
6879 WillstaetterStr. 13, D-40549 Duesseldorf Fax.: +49 211 5381573
6880 Vorstand: Eckhard Spoerr (Vors.), Axel Krieger, Stephan Esch, Eric Berger
6881 Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 74048
6882 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Prof. Dr. Helmut Thoma
6883
6884 -------------- next part --------------
6885 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
6886 Name: not available
6887 Type: application/pgp-signature
6888 Size: 189 bytes
6889 Desc: Digital signature
6890 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050304/3ee98cd8/attachment-0001.pgp
6891 From brain at winbot.co.uk Fri Mar 4 02:06:16 2005
6892 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
6893 Date: Fri Mar 4 02:06:12 2005
6894 Subject: [IRCServices] Unreal with NICKCHARS support (from CVS)
6895 In-Reply-To: <20050304100106.GA25510@freenet-ag.de>
6896 References: <422814F9.7030703@frostycoolslug.com> <42282467.54036@msgid.achurch.org>
6897 <20050304100106.GA25510@freenet-ag.de>
6898 Message-ID: <42283318.5070502@winbot.co.uk>
6899
6900 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6901 Hash: SHA1
6902
6903 RFCs 2810, 2811, 2812 and 2813 are specific to certain ircds, for
6904 example ircd2.9, which is used by ircnet. If IRCServices was to support
6905 all of these extra RFCs it would not work with the majority of ircds
6906 available as 99% of these ircds do not support them either. If i
6907 remember correctly only UTF-8 is supported by irc, which is why people
6908 have problems understanding concepts like 'irc cant do unicode, stop
6909 sending chinese characters' :P
6910
6911 Thanks,
6912 Brain
6913
6914 Holger Baust wrote:
6915 > Hi!
6916 >
6917 > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:01:02PM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
6918 >
6919 >>>>And one question: when Services will support other languages,
6920 >>>>russian for example. In current version Services are case sensitive
6921 >>>>with cyrillic chars.
6922 >>
6923 >> Probably never, unless someone updates RFC1459 with an official
6924 >>standard on non-ASCII characters.
6925 >
6926 > There are updates to RFC1459. Check the RFCs 2810, 2811, 2812 and 2813.
6927 > The paragraph about Character Codes are the same in RFC1459 and RFC2812.
6928 >
6929 > Regards,
6930 > Holger Baust
6931 >
6932 >
6933 >
6934 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
6935 >
6936 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
6937 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
6938 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
6939
6940 - --
6941 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
6942 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
6943 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
6944 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
6945 - --
6946 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
6947 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
6948
6949 iD8DBQFCKDMX0k42Wxli/BARAhDtAJ4jEavfFRAp9ZXPJQsQjbbvFh+uJACeK0gQ
6950 SVLjzb3hqA2vHAglX6CuBDA=
6951 =CNPq
6952 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
6953 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Mar 4 15:21:31 2005
6954 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
6955 Date: Fri Mar 4 15:21:40 2005
6956 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ Suspend (bug?)
6957 Message-ID: <002801c52110$e8078f10$2f4405d5@server>
6958
6959 If i forbid a nickname and IF it the nick is used the time i forbid it NickServ will show this on the user:
6960
6961 -NickServ- This nickname may not be used. Please choose another one. If you do not change your nickname within one minute, it will be changed automatically.
6962
6963
6964 BUT this is not happening with suspended nicknames.
6965 If i suspend a nickname and the nickname is used at the moment his owner can use it until he will be disconnect or change his nick to another one.
6966 -------------- next part --------------
6967 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
6968 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050305/e63b3d62/attachment.html
6969 From list at psam.se Sat Mar 5 06:32:52 2005
6970 From: list at psam.se (Psadi)
6971 Date: Sat Mar 5 06:33:41 2005
6972 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible bug but unable to reproduce
6973 Message-ID: <4229C314.9090309@psam.se>
6974
6975 Hi
6976
6977 I have a little strange error that I cant reproduce. I have a channel
6978 that is set to
6979 Options: Topic Retention, Private, Secure Ops, Restricted Access, Secure
6980 With those options a user that isnt on the access list would be kicked
6981 and baned. However I have had a user that wasnt on the access list just
6982 to be kicked and not baned?
6983
6984
6985 * DM|BRB (Darkmere@dont.show.com) has joined #solwarleader
6986 * DM|BRB was kicked by ChanServ (You are not permitted to be on this
6987 channel.)
6988
6989 This was handed to me from a staff (oper access level) on my server that
6990 is on that channel.
6991 The person that tries to join the channel has the following nicks registered
6992 Darkmere and DM|inBed so the user tried to join without a registered nick.
6993
6994 I have tried to reproduce this but I have been unable to do that so I
6995 dont think there is much more info I can offer.
6996
6997 Im running Freebsd 4.10 unreal 3.2.2 and ircservice 5.0.44 Though I
6998 havent seen anything about this in the changelog to the latest version.
6999
7000 Psadi
7001
7002 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Mar 5 19:15:23 2005
7003 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
7004 Date: Sat Mar 5 19:15:29 2005
7005 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible bug but unable to reproduce
7006 In-Reply-To: <4229C314.9090309@psam.se>
7007 References: <4229C314.9090309@psam.se>
7008 Message-ID: <422A75CB.7010208@frostycoolslug.com>
7009
7010 If you can not reproduce it, put it down to a random occurance (they
7011 happen!) Could possibly be an issue with your U:Lines or something
7012 blocking the mode change. Either way, if its working fine now, i
7013 wouldn't worry too much about it.
7014
7015 Psadi wrote:
7016 > Hi
7017 >
7018 > I have a little strange error that I cant reproduce. I have a channel
7019 > that is set to
7020 > Options: Topic Retention, Private, Secure Ops, Restricted Access, Secure
7021 > With those options a user that isnt on the access list would be kicked
7022 > and baned. However I have had a user that wasnt on the access list just
7023 > to be kicked and not baned?
7024 >
7025 >
7026 > * DM|BRB (Darkmere@dont.show.com) has joined #solwarleader
7027 > * DM|BRB was kicked by ChanServ (You are not permitted to be on this
7028 > channel.)
7029 >
7030 > This was handed to me from a staff (oper access level) on my server that
7031 > is on that channel.
7032 > The person that tries to join the channel has the following nicks
7033 > registered
7034 > Darkmere and DM|inBed so the user tried to join without a registered nick.
7035 >
7036 > I have tried to reproduce this but I have been unable to do that so I
7037 > dont think there is much more info I can offer.
7038 >
7039 > Im running Freebsd 4.10 unreal 3.2.2 and ircservice 5.0.44 Though I
7040 > havent seen anything about this in the changelog to the latest version.
7041 >
7042 > Psadi
7043 >
7044 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7045 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7046 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7047 >
7048 >
7049
7050 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Mar 6 21:22:31 2005
7051 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
7052 Date: Sun Mar 6 04:24:03 2005
7053 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.49 released
7054 Message-ID: <422af65a.14420@msgid.achurch.org>
7055
7056 Services 5.0.49 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
7057
7058 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
7059 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
7060
7061 bc56f52b0c3f203558f33c945f3c2bda ircservices-5.0.49.tar.gz
7062 1645eb889074dd8d2d37fa5d957235d2 ircservices-5.0.49.diff.gz
7063 a33a3e1738bc0006aa0a28f4a7b8b811 ircservices-5.0.49-1.i386.rpm
7064 8a6915103de4b909e2a0aa0746fb98c9 ircservices_5.0.49-1_i386.deb
7065
7066 The mirrors should have it shortly.
7067
7068 Alexander Zverev has graciously provided a Russian translation of the
7069 Services language file; this release is primarily to incorporate that file
7070 into the Services archive. The Unreal issues have been fixed (in theory,
7071 though not tested) in this release; I'll look into the +R and NickServ
7072 SUSPEND issues later.
7073
7074 Changes in version 5.0.49
7075 -------------------------
7076 2005/03/06 Added Russian language file, courtesy of Alexander Zverev
7077 <tty@inbox.ru>
7078 2005/03/05 Services will now accept multiple PROTOCTL messages from
7079 the Unreal ircd (as implemented in Unreal CVS).
7080 2005/03/04 Added support for +I/+j channel modes in Unreal 3.2.3.
7081 Reported by Kieron Thwaites <ron2k@webmail.co.za>
7082
7083 --Andrew Church
7084 achurch@achurch.org
7085 http://achurch.org/
7086 From phan70m at gmail.com Sun Mar 6 09:06:59 2005
7087 From: phan70m at gmail.com (Anton Wolkov)
7088 Date: Sun Mar 6 09:07:07 2005
7089 Subject: [IRCServices] Possible bug but unable to reproduce
7090 In-Reply-To: <422A75CB.7010208@frostycoolslug.com>
7091 References: <4229C314.9090309@psam.se> <422A75CB.7010208@frostycoolslug.com>
7092 Message-ID: <d50f59a00503060906248cc512@mail.gmail.com>
7093
7094 since i've been working with ircserivces for a while I myself have
7095 seen such behaviour, i believe it was related to 3rd party vhost
7096 modules for ircservices which sent CHGHOST to the server without
7097 updating the fakehost string on the ircservices, and thus ircservices
7098 are unable to detect the correct ban, or services believe ban is
7099 already set while in reality the user is not really banned.
7100 i can't be sure it was the issue, but it was the problem i had with
7101 chanserv unban, and since i've patched the issue i'm pretty sure i
7102 didn't see this no more.
7103 if this is not the issue however it could be simply desync, happens a
7104 lot, i get a "user parted but never joined" message in the logs almost
7105 every week, shit happens on multiple server networks.
7106 if unreal was coded as well as ircservices i'm sure none of this would
7107 have happened :)
7108
7109
7110 On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:15:23 +0000, Craig McLure
7111 <Craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
7112 > If you can not reproduce it, put it down to a random occurance (they
7113 > happen!) Could possibly be an issue with your U:Lines or something
7114 > blocking the mode change. Either way, if its working fine now, i
7115 > wouldn't worry too much about it.
7116 >
7117 > Psadi wrote:
7118 > > Hi
7119 > >
7120 > > I have a little strange error that I cant reproduce. I have a channel
7121 > > that is set to
7122 > > Options: Topic Retention, Private, Secure Ops, Restricted Access, Secure
7123 > > With those options a user that isnt on the access list would be kicked
7124 > > and baned. However I have had a user that wasnt on the access list just
7125 > > to be kicked and not baned?
7126 > >
7127 > >
7128 > > * DM|BRB (Darkmere@dont.show.com) has joined #solwarleader
7129 > > * DM|BRB was kicked by ChanServ (You are not permitted to be on this
7130 > > channel.)
7131 > >
7132 > > This was handed to me from a staff (oper access level) on my server that
7133 > > is on that channel.
7134 > > The person that tries to join the channel has the following nicks
7135 > > registered
7136 > > Darkmere and DM|inBed so the user tried to join without a registered nick.
7137 > >
7138 > > I have tried to reproduce this but I have been unable to do that so I
7139 > > dont think there is much more info I can offer.
7140 > >
7141 > > Im running Freebsd 4.10 unreal 3.2.2 and ircservice 5.0.44 Though I
7142 > > havent seen anything about this in the changelog to the latest version.
7143 > >
7144 > > Psadi
7145 > >
7146 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7147 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7148 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7149 > >
7150 > >
7151 >
7152 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7153 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7154 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7155 >
7156 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Mar 11 19:36:59 2005
7157 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
7158 Date: Fri Mar 11 19:37:54 2005
7159 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
7160 Message-ID: <000301c526b4$c1217010$484405d5@server>
7161
7162 On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
7163 If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick him.
7164 But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the oper
7165 from the channel.
7166 I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him at
7167 all.
7168
7169 From seth at gonca.net Sun Mar 13 03:49:10 2005
7170 From: seth at gonca.net (Evren)
7171 Date: Sun Mar 13 03:49:24 2005
7172 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in
7173 mask: *
7174 Message-ID: <007601c527c2$ac92aec0$0100000a@seth>
7175
7176 Hi,
7177 I'll paste logs and i have uploaded akill.db to http://www.gonca.net/svs/akill.db-bugged
7178
7179 I am running version : ircservices-5.0.48 services.turkirc.org build #3 on Unreal 3.2
7180
7181 What may be the problem according to logs below?
7182
7183 [Mar 09 17:33:45.183279 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org TKL - G * pc-010.diamond.vaslui.rdsnet.ro services.turkirc.o$
7184 [Mar 09 17:33:45.183480 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org TKL - G * 141.85.1.46 services.turkirc.org
7185 [Mar 09 17:33:45.183638 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7186 [Mar 09 17:33:45.184189 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7187 [Mar 09 17:33:45.184373 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org GLOBOPS :PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7188 [Mar 09 17:33:45.184655 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7189 [Mar 09 17:33:45.184803 2005] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
7190 [Mar 09 17:33:45.184980 2005] debug: Sent: :HelpServ QUIT :
7191 [Mar 09 17:33:45.185182 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7192
7193 **************
7194
7195 [Mar 11 00:46:41 2005] protocol/unreal: sjoin: SJOIN to channel #TurkIRC for non-existent nick DeatHGirL (1110153365 #TurkIRC)
7196 [Mar 11 00:46:47 2005] protocol/unreal: sjoin: SJOIN to channel #TurkIRC for non-existent nick DeatHGirL (1110153365 #TurkIRC)
7197 [Mar 11 00:46:55 2005] nickserv/main: Hangman!X@85.98.18.214 identified for nick Hangman
7198 [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7199 [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7200 [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7201 [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7202
7203 *************
7204
7205 [Mar 12 13:53:55 2005] nickserv/main: Alf!mithat83@dsl81-214-24839.adsl.ttnet.net.tr identified for nick Alf
7206 [Mar 12 13:59:09 2005] chanserv/main: Alf!mithat83@dsl81-214-24839.adsl.ttnet.net.tr identified for #dalga
7207 [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7208 [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7209 [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7210 [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7211
7212
7213 ************
7214
7215 [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7216 [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7217 [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7218 [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7219
7220 ***********
7221
7222 [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7223 [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7224 [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7225 [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7226
7227
7228
7229 ************
7230
7231 Evren
7232 -------------- next part --------------
7233 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
7234 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050313/d4b79684/attachment-0001.htm
7235 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun Mar 13 09:31:26 2005
7236 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
7237 Date: Sun Mar 13 09:29:21 2005
7238 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in
7239 mask: *
7240 In-Reply-To: <007601c527c2$ac92aec0$0100000a@seth>
7241 References: <007601c527c2$ac92aec0$0100000a@seth>
7242 Message-ID: <423478EE.6060605@frostycoolslug.com>
7243
7244 well, from what i've seen, it looks like you could be using the wrong
7245 protocol module, or the G:Line format has changed.
7246
7247 If you are using Unreal 3.2, and not 3.2.2b, i'd recommend updating, If
7248 you are using 3.2.3 CVS, i'd recommend downgrading untill its released
7249 officially.
7250
7251 But it looks like services isn't responding properly to the AKILL being set.
7252
7253 /****************************************
7254 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
7255 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
7256 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
7257 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
7258 ****************************************/
7259
7260 Evren wrote:
7261 > Hi,
7262 > I'll paste logs and i have uploaded akill.db to http://www.gonca.net/svs/akill.db-bugged
7263 >
7264 > I am running version : ircservices-5.0.48 services.turkirc.org build #3 on Unreal 3.2
7265 >
7266 > What may be the problem according to logs below?
7267 >
7268 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.183279 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org TKL - G * pc-010.diamond.vaslui.rdsnet.ro services.turkirc.o$
7269 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.183480 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org TKL - G * 141.85.1.46 services.turkirc.org
7270 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.183638 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7271 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.184189 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7272 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.184373 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org GLOBOPS :PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7273 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.184655 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7274 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.184803 2005] debug: Unloading module `misc/helpserv'
7275 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.184980 2005] debug: Sent: :HelpServ QUIT :
7276 > [Mar 09 17:33:45.185182 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7277 >
7278 > **************
7279 >
7280 > [Mar 11 00:46:41 2005] protocol/unreal: sjoin: SJOIN to channel #TurkIRC for non-existent nick DeatHGirL (1110153365 #TurkIRC)
7281 > [Mar 11 00:46:47 2005] protocol/unreal: sjoin: SJOIN to channel #TurkIRC for non-existent nick DeatHGirL (1110153365 #TurkIRC)
7282 > [Mar 11 00:46:55 2005] nickserv/main: Hangman!X@85.98.18.214 identified for nick Hangman
7283 > [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7284 > [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7285 > [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7286 > [Mar 11 00:47:42 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7287 >
7288 > *************
7289 >
7290 > [Mar 12 13:53:55 2005] nickserv/main: Alf!mithat83@dsl81-214-24839.adsl.ttnet.net.tr identified for nick Alf
7291 > [Mar 12 13:59:09 2005] chanserv/main: Alf!mithat83@dsl81-214-24839.adsl.ttnet.net.tr identified for #dalga
7292 > [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7293 > [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7294 > [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7295 > [Mar 12 14:00:43 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7296 >
7297 >
7298 > ************
7299 >
7300 > [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7301 > [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7302 > [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7303 > [Mar 12 19:58:07 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7304 >
7305 > ***********
7306 >
7307 > [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in mask: *
7308 > [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
7309 > [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] Services terminating: Abort trap
7310 > [Mar 13 03:31:28 2005] FATAL: Caught signal 6 (Abort trap) while shutting down
7311 >
7312 >
7313 >
7314 > ************
7315 >
7316 > Evren
7317 >
7318 >
7319 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
7320 >
7321 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7322 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7323 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7324
7325 From list at psam.se Mon Mar 14 10:23:05 2005
7326 From: list at psam.se (Psadi)
7327 Date: Mon Mar 14 10:23:59 2005
7328 Subject: [IRCServices] [Fwd: [Unreal-users] Unreal3.2.3 released]
7329 Message-ID: <4235D689.8060802@psam.se>
7330
7331 I gues that Andrew knows this allready. But I send it along so that more
7332 can get the info also
7333
7334 With regards
7335
7336 Psadi
7337
7338 -------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
7339 ?mne: [Unreal-users] Unreal3.2.3 released
7340 Datum: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:35:31 +0100
7341 Fr?n: Bram Matthys <syzop@unrealircd.com>
7342 Till: unreal-notify@lists.sourceforge.net
7343 Kopia: unreal-users@lists.sourceforge.net
7344
7345
7346
7347 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
7348 Hash: SHA1
7349
7350 After almost 5 months of coding (not counting the hotfix)
7351 there's finally a new 3.2* stable release out: 3.2.3.
7352 As usual, this is a recommended upgrade.
7353
7354 Unreal3.2.3 Release Notes
7355 ==========================
7356
7357 ==[ GENERAL INFORMATION ]==
7358 - - If you are upgrading on *NIX, make sure you run 'make clean' and './Config'
7359 first before doing 'make'
7360 - - The official UnrealIRCd documentation is doc/unreal32docs.html
7361 online version at: http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html
7362 FAQ: http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/faq/
7363 Read them before asking for help.
7364 - - Report bugs at http://bugs.unrealircd.org/
7365 - - When upgrading a network, we assume you are upgrading from the previous
7366 version (3.2.2). If you got a net running with servers that are several
7367 versions behind (eg: 3.2.1) then you might experience (desynch) problems.
7368 Also, if you try to use the new features, some might not work properly
7369 until all your servers are upgraded. It is therefore recommended to
7370 upgrade all servers in a 'short' time span (x day[s], not weeks).
7371
7372 ==[ NEW ]==
7373 - - Channel mode +I (invex, invite exceptions). Users on this list can join +i channels
7374 without needing an /invite.
7375 - - Channel mode +j (jointhrottle). If you set +j X:Y you limit each user (individually)
7376 to X joins per Y seconds to the channel.
7377 - - Nick Character System: this allows you to choose which additional characters to
7378 allow in nicknames by language (and codepage). Currently available are:
7379 catalan, dutch, french, german, swiss-german, icelandic, italian, spanish,
7380 swedish, hungarian, polish, romanian, slovak, czech, greek, turkish, russian,
7381 hebrew and chinese. There are also several 'groups' available, for more info see:
7382 http://www.vulnscan.org/UnrealIrcd/unreal32docs.html#feature_nickchars
7383 - - *NIX: ./Config -advanced, allows you to choose more options
7384 - - tld::botmotd and tld::opermotd
7385 - - Using /INVITE with no parameters will a list of channels you are invited to
7386 but have not yet joined.
7387 - - set::gline-address, works just like set::kline-address but then for glines.
7388 - - Added a basic regex tutorial in unreal32docs.html
7389 - - /SAJOIN now supports multiple channels (and '0') again.
7390 - - Spamfilter topic support ('t' in spamfilter, 'topic' in conf).
7391 - - Added a feature to +b/+e ~c: ~c:[prefix]<#channel>. This can be used if you for
7392 example trust all ops of #leet: mode #x +e ~c:@#leet.
7393 - - Various translated documents in doc/: unreal32docs.gr.html (Greek), help.fr.conf
7394 and example.fr.conf (French), help.de.conf & example.de.conf (German), and
7395 example.hu.conf (Hungarian).
7396
7397 ==[ CHANGED ]==
7398 - - Updated auspice.conf
7399 - - The usual doc updates, help.conf, spamfilter.conf, dccallow.conf, etc.
7400 - - The config parser got (mostly) recoded. This makes it rehash much faster,
7401 additionally "duplicate item" checking is now available.
7402 - - Added a 'B' flag to /who output for bots. Also normal users can now /who +m B.
7403 - - Support in configfiles for \\ (= a \)
7404 - - set::dns::bind::ip, hardly useful for anyone
7405 - - If a user is +b on a channel, and set::allow-userhost-change force-rejoin is
7406 in use, then a part/join is not sent in order to prevent flooding.
7407 - - OperOverride INVITE notices are now sent out globally to all +s +e users.
7408 - - User mode 'g' is now operonly, it hardly did anything for non-opers.
7409 - - Made CIDR no longer accept bitmasks with less than 16bits for /*line commands.
7410 - - Modulized a lot of commands (~5000 lines of code).
7411 - - Made channel modes +c/+S deal with RGB color codes.
7412 - - If no log { } block is present, then a warning will be printed and we will log
7413 by default to ircd.log (errors only).
7414 - - If an invalid character is found in a nick then the whole nick is rejected now.
7415 - - Changed numeric&text of 'is a Secure Connection' to 'is using a Secure Connection',
7416 client coders are encouraged to add support for this new numeric 671. Until then,
7417 in-window-/whois's will probably be broken.
7418 - - A locops with can_override/can_gkline/can_gzline is now automatically converted
7419 to a globop, just like we do with can_globalroute/can_gkline. These privileges
7420 are GLOBAL and therefore are not meant to be granted to locops.
7421 - - A warning is now sent to an oper if (s)he tries to use /(G)ZLINE on a host.
7422 (G)ZLINES should be placed on *@ipmasks because they are processed before any
7423 ident and host lookups.
7424 - - Made (fast) badwords work better with word boundaries, in practice this means
7425 blocking of words with accents/umlauts/es-zett/etc now works properly.
7426 - - Made it so halfops can now -h themselves and chanadmins can -a themselves.
7427 - - Made spamfilter 'u' also check nickchanges.
7428
7429 ==[ MAJOR BUGS FIXED ]==
7430 - - Serious crashbug [this is the same fix that was fixed by the hotfix/3.2.2b]
7431 - - TRE mem corruption- & crash-bugs (eg: in backreferences).
7432
7433 ==[ MINOR BUGS FIXED ]==
7434 - - Made kline/shun/zline/gzline without parameters report the correct stats(flag).
7435 - - Made a few more errors send out to all opers, such as link::bind-ip problems.
7436 - - A few missing operflags in /STATS O (and SVSO)
7437 - - DCC Spamfilter was not always working correctly
7438 - - OperOverriding to, for example, a +zi channel did not print the special join notice.
7439 - - Servers behind ulines were not properly ulined, one effect that had was causing
7440 an odd view in /MAP if you had flat-map + hide ulines + a juped server in services.
7441 - - Made SVSMODE -b/-e remove bans/excepts placed on IPs
7442 - - The set::htm::incoming-rate config item was not working correctly
7443 - - If a user was +R then remote server notices were accidently also filtered.
7444 - - A locop setting MODE #CHAN +O caused a desynch
7445 - - Resolver sometimes incorrectly aliased names, causing incorect TTLs etc.
7446 - - Fixed SVSNOOP not removing ALL oper status properly.
7447 - - 'shun' target was not working for spamfilter and ban version { }
7448 - - Removing of shuns placed on IP's did not take effect immediately (had to reconnect).
7449 - - Fixed a bug in mode skipping (eg: '+qk a b' if not +q) and error msgs.
7450 - - Chanmode +f #t (per-user text limit) now no longer affects halfops.
7451 - - Opers w/can_override can now +qa/-qa if they are not netadmins, also affected +L/+u.
7452 Be sure you upgrade all servers to 3.2.3 if using these new abilities, or else you
7453 will get desynch issues.
7454 - - Fixed several /SAMODE bugs as well, regarding non-netadmins, being halfop'ed, etc.
7455 - - /GZLINE [nick] was placing a *line on *@host instead of *@IP, fixed.
7456 - - alias::format in combination with ::type 'command' caused a crash
7457 - - zlib upgraded to 1.2.2, curl upgraded to 7.13.1, both fix various issues.
7458 - - Win32 installer now also installs doc\technical\*.*
7459 - - Desynch issues regarding +s/+p and +c/+S
7460 - - /SAMODE causing a 'fishy timestamp' if a cmode with a digit parameter was used.
7461
7462 ==[ REMOVED ]==
7463 - - NAZIISH_CHBAN_HANDLING (did not work at all)
7464 - - The 'oldcloak' cloaking module is now removed, since this old algorithm got broken
7465 8 months ago, nobody should be using it anymore.
7466
7467 ==[ CHANGELOG ]==
7468 - - Fixed a typo in the makefile for USERIP
7469 - - Made the WATCH command work for WebTV users (#0002121) suggested by White_Magic.
7470 - - Some text updates... docs: now 3.2.2-CVS, also got rid of double version to avoid
7471 confusion. credits: fixed typo.
7472 - - Added updated auspice.conf from Rocko since previous one was outdated (#0002147).
7473 - - Recoded the config parsing code
7474 - The new system is much faster, for the programmers out there, the
7475 old system averaged O(MN) where N was the number of sub-directives for a block, and
7476 M was the number of sub-directives actually contained in the block in the config file.
7477 The new system averages O(N), so the number of sub-directives no longer has a significant
7478 impact on performance.
7479 - Added duplicate config entry detection (#0002126) suggested by brain2
7480 - May have a few bugs (easily fixed)
7481 - - Corrected numerous -Wall warnings
7482 - - Fixed a bug with /rehash and classes due to the config parser rewrite
7483 - - Modified the module symbol dependency code to do more accurate searching for the module
7484 that contains the necessary symbol (#0002123) suggested by Xuefer.
7485 - Unreal will now prepend the pathname to the module and append the appropriate extension
7486 (.so or .dll) to the end)
7487 - The new module system version is "3.2.3" to allow for backwards compatibility
7488 - - Documented the default behavior of snomasks when /mode nick +s is used (#0002141) suggested
7489 by Bugz.
7490 - - Added "const" to the functions in match.c, (#0002116) suggested by Xuefer.
7491 - - Made ./Config better handle command line arguments
7492 - - Removed NAZIISH_CHBAN_HANDLING as it didn't do anything
7493 - - Added -advanced flag to ./Config to configure advanced options (#0002145) suggested by
7494 Bugz. As a result, some config.h options are now in ./Config -advanced.
7495 - - Small fix for above
7496 - - Added the ability to specify a botmotd and opermotd in a tld {} (#0000176) suggested by
7497 swissSolaris.
7498 - - Fixed crashbug on /rehash due to config rewrite, also made DEBUGMODE working again.
7499 - - Removed an excess space from the SAMODE notice when a mode without a parameter was set
7500 (#0002134) reported by Bugz.
7501 - - Fixed small memory leak on /rehash (post-3.2.2).
7502 - - Fixed botmotd crash due to last change (post-3.2.2).
7503 - - Updated the Donation file
7504 - - Added a 'B' flag to /who output for bots, and allowed normal users to /who +m B
7505 (#0002096) suggested by White_Magic
7506 - - Added support for using \\ in the config file to indicate a \ (#0002178) reported by
7507 TimeFX
7508 - - Added documentation for set::options::fail-oper-warn (#0002166) reported by Snake
7509 - - Removed an extra ) in the Throttle disconnect message (#0002165) reported by Snake
7510 - - Fixed a bug where the "looking up your hostname" message could still be displayed even
7511 if hostname resolving was disabled (#0002161) reported by Xuefer
7512 - - Made typing /kline, /shun, /zline, and /gzline correctly report the correct /stats flag,
7513 and these commands now produce the same output as the respective /stats flag they emulate
7514 (#0002149) reported by Snake
7515 - - Renamed some calls from report_error() to report_baderror() since otherwise the errors are
7516 hardly ever seen (unless you have +s +j set). For example a bad link::bind-ip only caused
7517 "Couldn't connect to xxxxxx" without any meaningful error message. Additionally, errors
7518 sent to report_baderror() are now logged.
7519 - - Win32 installer: Apparently 'install as a service' was still not the default, reported
7520 by fez (#0002191, #0002189).
7521 - - Fixed the crule parser to treat - and : as valid 'word' characters rather than separators
7522 (#0002188) reported by diskman1.
7523 - - Fixed bug in remote version reply, reported by DukePyrolator (#0002180).
7524 - - Added set::dns::bind-ip (rarely ever needed, but might be useful for paranoid people).
7525 - - Some unreal32docs->security section improvements.
7526 - - Fixed a minor bug in the new config system when displaying link {} and set::hosts errors
7527 (#0002194) reported by AngryWolf.
7528 - - Renamed RPL_INVITELIST/RPL_ENDOFINVITELIST to RPL_INVEXLIST/RPL_ENDOFINVEXLIST
7529 - - Using /invite with no parameters now lists the channels you are invited to but have not
7530 yet joined (#0002190) suggested by sac.
7531 - - Added some missing operflags to /stats O and SVSO (#0002193) reported by Bugz.
7532 - - If a user is +b on a channel, and set::allow-userhost-change force-rejoin is used, a
7533 part/join is not sent in order to prevent flooding (#0001933) suggested by Z3l3zT.
7534 - - Rewrote some of the previous change to deal with some strange issues found by aquanight
7535 - Introduced two new macros DYN_LOCAL and DYN_FREE to allow creation/deletion of dynamically
7536 sized arrays in the most efficient manner (C99 variable length, alloca, or malloc)
7537 - - Changed the +z cannot join message to be a bit more descriptive (#0002148) suggested by cust.
7538 - - Added a config.h options, IPV6_COMPRESSED to make Unreal use compressed IPv6 addresses where
7539 possible (#0002107) suggested by Neo-Vortex.
7540 - - Fixed alloca warning @ Linux (post-3.2.2)
7541 - - Numeric audit: 15 small changes (int/long mismatches etc). This might have fixed some
7542 bugs on architectures where 'long' and 'int' have different sizes (eg: opteron).
7543 - - Added a set::gline-address which works like set::kline-address (#0001298) suggested by
7544 Bugz.
7545 - - Added missing documentation for spamfilter away target (#0002205) reported by Dukat.
7546 - - Fixed dcc spamfilter problem reported by TimeFX and Deadalus (#2177, #2204).
7547 - - Fixed Oper Override not giving a 'special join notice' if +z is set along with another mode
7548 (eg: +i/+k), reported by tabrisnet (#0001487).
7549 - - help.conf: Fixed a typo, updated *CMDS indexes a bit, reported crazy (#0002208),
7550 added long flags to OFLAGS.
7551 - - OperOverride INVITE notices are now also global (if you have the eyes snomask set) (#2212).
7552 - - Module coders: New function: sendto_snomask_global().
7553 - - Speedup sendto_snomask/sendto_connectnotice/sendto_fconnectnotice code.
7554 - - spamfilter.conf: fixed mIRC exploit sigs
7555 - - Fixed all spamfilters in configfile not working due to configrewrite (post-3.2.2).
7556 - - Module coders: sendto_snomask* now only sends to opers, sendto_snomask_normal* can be used
7557 to send to normal users w/the snomask set.
7558 - - Fixed dcc filtering a bit more.
7559 - - Made usermode 'g' operonly since it didn't do much, reported by DukePyrolator (#0002024).
7560 - - Fixed tkl except { } not working (post-3.2.2).
7561 - - Fixed bug where servers behind ulines were not ulined, causing for example juped servers to
7562 show up if flat-map was enabled, reported by GSF19 (#0002230).
7563 - - Some doc/ updates: removed: Unreal31_to_32.html & example.settings, updated: Authors &
7564 translations.txt.
7565 - - Added a basic regex tutorial to unreal32docs.html (#0000920)
7566 - - Updated wircd.def
7567 - - Made CIDR no longer accept bitmasks with less than 16bits for /*line commands (#0002240)
7568 reported by aquanight.
7569 - - Made the (?) kill message not show IP addresses (#0002227) reported by neothematrix.
7570 - - Added some error checking to /sapart (#0002253) suggested by Troco.
7571 - - Imported TRE 0.7.2 for Windows
7572 - - Imported TRE 0.7.2 for *nix
7573 - - Got rid of wma/wmv in dccallow.conf, better to require an explicit select here due to
7574 recent DRM exploits (spyware etc).
7575 - - Fixed /restart reasons, reported by SouL-FoRTuNe.
7576 - - Partial (incomplete!) fix for alloca warnings during compile (especially w/SSL).
7577 - - Fixed serious crashbug that can be triggered by users, released a hotfix and a seperate
7578 version called 3.2.2b (which is just 3.2.2+patch+version change to '3.2.2b',
7579 nothing else).
7580 - - Fixed 'make install' error due to example.settings remove.
7581 - - Fixed a minor typo in the "now an oper" announcement (#0002284) reported by Rocko.
7582 - - Made SVSMODE -b and -e remove bans/excepts placed on IPs (#0002270) reported by Snake.
7583 - - Fixed a couple of problems introduced with the ./Config -advanced changed (#0002239).
7584 - - Made the win32 installer include the dccallow.conf (#0002269) reported by Ron2K.
7585 - - Made the win32 installer work with the latest version of Inno Setup (5.0.6).
7586 - - Made /sajoin support multiple channels and using 0 (#0002231) suggested by acemi.
7587 - - Fixed a problem where doing ./unreal restart multiple times would not actually restart
7588 the ircd (#0002120) reported by SineSwiper.
7589 - - Made it so +f notices are sent to %#chan, not @%#chan (#0002248) reported by aquanight.
7590 - - Hopefully fixed the last of the alloca warnings (#0002202) reported by Stoebi.
7591 - - Fixed a problem with set::htm::incoming-rate being interpreted incorrectly (#0002266)
7592 reported by tabrisnet.
7593 - - Fixed a resolver cache bug regarding CNAME's. Thanks to insiderZ.DE for tracing down
7594 this issue.
7595 - - Fixed a bug related to the sajoin recode regarding notices displayed (#0002293) reported
7596 by Troco.
7597 - - Reworded a cloak-key error message to make it clearer (#0002297) reported by Bugz.
7598 - - Fixed a bug where /whois notices were not sent to users who are +R if the sender is -r
7599 and on a remote server (#0002288) reported by Freadon.
7600 - - Made /stats E include tkl except stats as well (#0001524) suggested by Cnils.
7601 - - Added an options member to the ExtbanInfo structure. This currently supports one flag,
7602 EXTBOPT_CHSVSMODE. When set, this extban will be removed when an SVSMODE -b [nick] is
7603 executed (#0002222) suggested by Snake.
7604 - - Fixed a bug where specifying a reason to SVSPART would cause it to fail (#0002210) reported
7605 by tabrisnet.
7606 - - Moved channel mode +G to extcmode to make room for invex.
7607 - - Added debug code to trace proto-check bugs in DEBUGMODE [IsToken() etc]
7608 - - [Module coders] Added new function: do_cmd(cptr, sptr, cmd, parc, parv) which is an
7609 uniform method to call any other commands. For more info, see description in src/packet.c.
7610 This will be used for any further modulization of commands that need to call other
7611 commands, like NICK (will be done soon).
7612 - - Added invite exceptions (+I). This prevents users from needing a /invite in for a +i
7613 channel (#0002044) suggested by medice.
7614 - - Updated help.conf's +f documentation for the new syntax
7615 - - Fixed some problems with the /stats help and documentation (#0002299) reported by Rocko.
7616 - - Corrected the help.conf documentation for /invite (#0002306) reported by White_Magic.
7617 - - Fixed a documentation inconsistency with me::numeric (#0002290) reported by Bugz.
7618 - - Fixed a problem when compiling Unreal with GUEST support (#0001758) dvzion.
7619 - - Fixed a win32 GUI problem where the tray menu's config submenu was not updated when new
7620 files were loaded or files were unloaded (#0002084) reported by Troco.
7621 - - Made m_template.c use CommandAdd() and CMD_FUNC()
7622 - - Modulized a lot of commands and related subfunctions: NICK (750 lines), USER (200),
7623 MODE (2300), WATCH (250), JOIN (600), PART (250), MOTD (100), OPERMOTD (100),
7624 BOTMOTD (100), LUSERS (100). More will follow soon (probably including more subfunctions
7625 related to existing commands).
7626 - - Various (important) fixes to above, also made win32 compile work again.
7627 - - And some more.
7628 - - Made unreal_copyfile try hardlinking first, if that fails.. it will try to copy
7629 (perhaps this should be a different function?). Anyway, this means less diskspace
7630 is needed (~1.5mb or more), and it also makes it a bit easier for RBAC (#2300).
7631 - - Made a new function DoMD5() which is ssl/non-ssl independent. Also made the cloaking
7632 module and the auth functions use it. Hopefully I didn't break anything ;). Suggested
7633 by Bugz (#2298).
7634 - - Fixed mode #chan +O set by locop causing a desynch, reported by Unim4trix0 (#0001946).
7635 - - Added spamfilter topic support ('t' in /spamfilter, or 'topic' in conf), suggested
7636 by Z3l3zT (#0001929).
7637 - - Updated makefile to fix compile problem, reported by vonitsanet (#0002317) [?].
7638 Also made loading m_*.so work again.
7639 - - Added unreal_copyfileex() which works just like unreal_copyfile() but has an additional
7640 param to try hardlinks first.
7641 - - Win32 crash fixes due to modulizing
7642 - - Made channel mode +c block RGB color codes.
7643 - - Fixed a bug with channel alias{}'s where using the format syntax caused a crash (#0002323)
7644 reported by Snake.
7645 - - Made channel mode +S strip RGB color codes.
7646 - - Added channelmode +j (jointhrottle), syntax: /mode #chan +j X:Y, and then it will
7647 throttle the number of joins per-user to X in Y seconds. Idea from Angrywolf (who
7648 wrote a module that did this before). This needs testing :).
7649 It's enabled by default but can be #undef'ed in include/config.h (line 449).
7650 - - Added a feature to +b ~c, ~c:[prefix]<#channel>, prefix can be +/%/@/&/~ and will
7651 check if the user is voiced/halfoped/etc.. Especially useful for +e ~c. Idea from
7652 Bugz (#0002198). Obviously all servers need to be upgraded to make this work.
7653 - - Fixed SVSNOOP bug where remote servers still thought the opers had privileges, reported
7654 by Zell (#0002185)
7655 - - Docs: log { } from 'optional' -> 'recomended'
7656 - - If no log { } block is present a warning will be printed out and we will fallback
7657 to a default of logging errors to ircd.log. Suggested by w00t (#0002327).
7658 - - Fixed shuns not working as target in spamfilter and ban version { }, reported by Bugz
7659 (#0002223).
7660 - - Fixed a bug where shuns placed on IP's did not take effect to currently connected users.
7661 - - Fixed a small doc bug regarding shun in spamfilter, reported by KnuX (#0002338).
7662 - - Added greek docs, translator: GSF.
7663 - - Some help.conf/005.txt updates, reported by Ron2K (#0002354).
7664 - - No longer cutoff nick upon illegal character -- just reject the whole nick. The nick is
7665 still cutoff if the nick is too long. Basically this is the same way as Hybrid does it
7666 so it should work ok :).
7667 - - Added nick character system. This allows you to choose which (additional) characters
7668 to allow in nicks via set::allowed-nickchars. See unreal32docs.html -> section 3.16
7669 for a list of available languages and more info on how to use it.
7670 Current list: dutch, french, german, italian, spanish, euro-west, chinese-trad,
7671 chinese-simp, chinese-ja, chinese.
7672 If you wonder why your language is not yet included or why a certain mistake is present,
7673 then please understand that we are most likely not experienced (at all) in your language.
7674 If you are a native of your language (or know the language well), and your language
7675 is not included yet or you have some corrections, then contact syzop@vulnscan.org or
7676 report it as a bug on http://bugs.unrealircd.org/
7677 - - Added swedish support for nicks, supplied by Tank.
7678 - - Various updates to unreal32docs from Ron2K (#0002354).
7679 - - set::allowed-nickchars:
7680 - Renamed 'euro-west' to 'latin1' since that's more descriptive/fair ;)
7681 - Added 'hungarian' [supplied by AngryWolf]
7682 - Added category 'latin2': just Hungarian for now
7683 - Added 'catalan' [supplied by Trocotronic]
7684 - Added 'greek' [supplied by GSF]
7685 - Added category 'latin7': alias for 'greek'
7686 - Added category 'gbk': alias for 'chinese'
7687 - - Removed 2 unneeded characters from 'catalan'.
7688 - - Added NICKCHARS= in PROTOCTL. This indicates which languages are accepted in nicks.
7689 If 2 servers try to link and the allowed nick characters do not fully match, then
7690 the link will be rejected. Note that this will not prevent you from 3.2.2<->3.2.3/CVS
7691 charsets mistakes, but only with linking CVS/3.2.3+ servers. Suggested by Troco (#0002360)
7692 This might need some additional testing, but initial results are positive :).
7693 - - NickChars:
7694 - Got rid of 'latin7', tiny mistake ;)
7695 - Removed e' accent from German (used in borrow-words only), reported by Dukat.
7696 - Added 'swiss-german', which is just German without es-zett, reported by Dukat.
7697 - Added 'turkish', supplied by Ayberk Yancatoral.
7698 - Build in some additional checks (especially for Chinese).
7699 - Fixed a bug in chinese character range (affecting 3.2*)
7700 - Relaxed nick character checking from remote servers (rely on NICKCHARS= PROTOCTL
7701 to deal with problems). This is useful to prevent any kills in case we slightly
7702 change the characters that are allowed in a language.
7703 - Added 'polish' (latin2), supplied by k4be.
7704 - Added 'hebrew' (iso8859-8I / windows-1255), supplied by PHANTOm.
7705 - - Added French example.fr.conf and help.fr.conf, translated/maintained by Babass.
7706 - - Fixed a doc typo, reported by SDF_of_BC.
7707 - - NickChars: Updated polish a bit, and added polish-w1250 which is unfortunately more
7708 common than real latin2 (iso-8859-2), supplied by k4be as well.
7709 - - NickChars: Added 'icelandic', supplied by Saevar.
7710 - - Updated wircd.def
7711 - - Fixed a bug where USERIP would say USERHOST in the not-enough-parameters numeric
7712 (#0002366) reported by vonitsanet.
7713 - - Fixed a bug causing SVSNICK not to send out a snomask +n notice (#0002359) reported by
7714 Rob_.
7715 - - Fixed a bug where SAJOIN would list channels multiple times in the notices (#0002325)
7716 reported by vonitsanet.
7717 - - Fixed a bug in mode-skipping (eg '+qk a b' if not +q) and error msgs, reported by brain2
7718 (#0002372).
7719 - - Fixed bug where chanmode +f #t (per-user text kick[ban]) was also affecting halfops,
7720 reported by seneces (#0002333).
7721 - - Fixed doc bug reported by Dukat (#0002374). Also fixed 2 error msgs related to
7722 the nickchars system printing out incorrect set:: directives.
7723 - - spamfilter.conf and dccallow.conf are now also copied upon make install, reported by
7724 TommyTheKid (#0002313).
7725 - - Made CHGIDENT, CHGHOST and CHGNAME use more numerics (where possible) (#0002358).
7726 - - Fixed halfop trying to set chanmode +G/+T/+j not getting an error message, reported
7727 by Ron2K (#Ron2K).
7728 - - Module coders: using extcmode_default_requirechop is now depricated, check src/extcmodes.c
7729 ctrl+f extcmode_default_requirechop for more details (solution: copy+paste & fill in modechar).
7730 - - Nicks with ~ are now also not cutoff anymore but rejected like any other illegal char (#0002074).
7731 - - Fixed bug in +G where with not-really-matching-words color was needlessly stripped,
7732 reported by SpeedFire (#0002375).
7733 - - Changed the 'is a Secure Connection' msg/numeric in /whois from RPL_WHOISSPECIAL to
7734 a slightly changed RPL_WHOISSECURE, namely: ':%s 671 %s %s :is using a Secure connection',
7735 I'm sure some client coders will bitch at this, but the current way is brok in 2 ways:
7736 - RPL_WHOISSPECIAL is meant for 1 line of additional whois info, usually an IRCOp title or
7737 description. Having a dedicated numeric for it allows for client-side interpretations
7738 and/or translations.
7739 - The 'is a Secure Connection' was incorrect English, this has been reported numerous times.
7740 The PRO's of this change are clear, the only CON is that in-window-/whois's are now
7741 likely not to show this line properly in-window but rather in the status window, until client
7742 coders implement this numeric.
7743 If you wonder why we didn't use RPL_USINGSSL, that's because this numeric collides with
7744 RPL_STATSDLINE (which we are already using for >5 years).
7745 If you wonder why we didn't use the RPL_WHOISSECURE numeric as-is (even though I haven't
7746 seen it in use anywhere), then that's because we wanted to minimize display problems in
7747 the transition period and the extra parameter would not be used by us anyway.
7748 - - If a locop now has can_override/can_gkline/can_gzline we will print out a warning and
7749 convert it to globops. This is also what we always did for can_globalroute/can_gkill
7750 (well, except the warning). Giving such NETWORK (GLOBAL) privileges to a LOCAL operator
7751 does not make any sense and is therefore no longer allowed.
7752 - - NickChars:
7753 - Added 'russian-w1251', supplied by Roman Parkin. There are like 7 standards
7754 in Russia (and like 2-3 main ones), so I didn't dare to call this one 'russian' ;).
7755 - Added 'czech-w1250' and 'slovak-w1250' (both might miss a few characters).
7756 - Added 'windows-1250' group which contains czech-w1250, slovak-w1250, polish-w1250
7757 and hungarian.
7758 - Hungarian characters show both fine in w1250 and latin2, hence hungarian is included
7759 both in 'windows-1250' and 'latin2'.
7760 - Fixed bug: polish was not included in latin2
7761 - - Fixed various OperOverride issues:
7762 - Opers with can_override can now +qa/-qa even if they are not netadmins,
7763 and they can also (un)set L/u.
7764 - Fixed several SAMODE bugs, such as not completely working for non-netadmins and
7765 not working if you were halfop'ed, etc.
7766 Bugs reported by pak, aquanight, niphler, Bugz, and more.
7767 If there are still any bugs left, please report them on http://bugs.unrealircd.org/
7768 NOTE: some of these enhancements will produce desynchs if your net is not 100%
7769 on current CVS / Unreal3.2.3 and an oper tries to use these 'new features'.
7770 So use with care on mixed-version nets.
7771 - - Fixed /(G)ZLINE [nick] placing the *line on *@host instead of *@IP, reported by
7772 Snake (#0002246).
7773 - - A warning is now sent to the oper if (s)he tries to add a (G)ZLINE on *@host.
7774 (G)ZLINES should have an ipmask, not a hostmask, because they are processed BEFORE
7775 any dns lookups are done. Therefore any (g)zlines placed will probably work
7776 (but not necessarily) for like an hour (or whatever TTL), but after that the
7777 (ab)user can get in again so this is usually not what you want ;).
7778 I suppose I'll add a FAQ entry about this.
7779 - - Made badwords (+G) now work with hardcoded word boundaries. Also made the fastbadwords
7780 system accept more characters. Basically what this means is that the (fast) badwords
7781 system can now be used to properly block words with accents and things like that, just
7782 the way you block English words. Bug reported by MJ12Helios (#0002311).
7783 - - Fixed 'russian-w1251', was not working ok at all.
7784 - - Made it so halfops can -h themselves, and chanadmins can -a themselves, reported
7785 by fez (#0001503).
7786 - - Made spamfilter 'u' also check nickchanges, reported by Gilou (#0002251).
7787 - - Updated doc/technical/token.txt, reported by webfox (#0002373).
7788 - - NickChars: Added 'romanian', supplied by crazytoon.
7789 - - Added 3.2.3 release notes (expected to be changed later on).
7790 - - Updated russian-w1251 (added 2 chars).
7791 - - Made the (G)ZLINE warning only happen on add, as it should. Reported by crazy.
7792 - - Made some (incorrect) -Wall warnings dissapear.
7793 - - Renamed version to 3.2.3-pre1, for Thursday. I'll keep the doc version numbers
7794 at 3.2.2-CVS to avoid confusion with the online semi-realtime docs ;).
7795 ** internal 3.2.3-pre1 release **
7796 - - Fixed a bug with /invite with no parameters (accidentily broken when +I was added)
7797 (#0002383) reported by trystanscott.
7798 - - Fixed a bug where /SAJOIN user 0 caused a desynch, reported by trystanscott (#0002384).
7799 - - Merged NICKCHARS= in PROTOCTL for now, since a seperate one is not (yet!) needed,
7800 reported by SolutechUK and psadi (#0002386).
7801 - - Fixed various (major) problems that the '-h yourself' caused, reported by Trocotronic
7802 (#0002387).
7803 - - Fix for above, also reported by Trocotronic.
7804 ** internal 3.2.3-pre2 release **
7805 - - Fixed a couple of typos in doc/example.conf (#0002393) reported by AngryWolf.
7806 - - Added documentation about channel mode +j (#0002392) suggested by Dukat.
7807 - - Added doc/help.de.conf and doc/example.hu.conf
7808 - - Fixed +s/+p and +c/+S desynch issue during netmerge, reported by Ron2K (#0002391).
7809 - - Fixed a bug where an unknown operflag would cause a crash.
7810 - - Windows versions will now be compiled with zlib 1.2.2 and curl 7.13.1.
7811 - - Made windows installer also install doc\technical\*
7812 - - Removed oldcloak cloaking module, everyone should be using the new cloak one by now.
7813 - - Updated release notes (translated docs, zlib, doc\technical, sp/cS desynch).
7814 - - Made +g get removed when an oper sets -o (#0002399) reported by Ron2K.
7815 - - Made it so the win32 version shows channel modes in /list (#0002397) reported by Ron2K.
7816 - - Fixed /SAMODE with no can_override not always working with +G/+j/+T (extcmodes), reported
7817 by Ron2K (#0002398).
7818 - - Added doc/example.de.conf
7819 ** internal 3.2.3-pre3 release **
7820 - - Some spelling fixes in unreal32docs.html, reported by alex323 (#2412).
7821 - - Updated the list of donators
7822 - - /SAMODE could cause 'fishy timestamp' if digit parameters were used (eg: SAMODE #chan +l 5),
7823 this has now be fixed by sending an explicit TS 0.
7824 - - Fixed an important channelmode +j memory corruption bug that would cause crashes, reported
7825 by Bergee (#0002416).
7826 - - Some clarifications on /RESTART, remote restarts were well never supported, so the docs
7827 are now updated on that (no code changes).
7828 ** internal 3.2.3-pre4 release **
7829 - - Corrected small doc typo in unreal32docs, reported by arbiter.
7830 ** 3.2.3 release **
7831
7832 Downloadable, as usual, from http://www.unrealircd.com/
7833
7834 We have created 2 PGP keys:
7835 releases@unrealircd.com [0x1C8A554E]
7836 http://www.unrealircd.com/pgp/release_key.asc
7837 Used for signing releases _only_
7838 coders@lists.unrealircd.org [0x61904C03]
7839 http://www.unrealircd.com/pgp/coders_key.asc
7840 For secure communication with the UnrealIRCd head coders.
7841
7842 Since all releases now have PGP signatures (see details when downloading a
7843 file), we suggest you to validate the downloaded files via PGP/GPG instead
7844 of using MD5/SHA1 checksums. But here they are anyway...
7845
7846 MD5 checksums (not recommended):
7847 b41f09c5999c67dc8e33db777b7397cf Unreal3.2.3.tar.gz
7848 32c1b8545901717775a7d1fc26bea45c Unreal3.2.3.exe
7849 5e2052ce173edc63c577ab97af1c99c5 Unreal3.2.3-SSL.exe
7850
7851 SHA1 checksums:
7852 5820906434f0c9e2cd027882e85900a919a2065d Unreal3.2.3.tar.gz
7853 b5897b0e02ae96475fa15c08d5e1c8452de468bb Unreal3.2.3.exe
7854 535e06ba695f134683d91d7f9cd2eaf15cdf3457 Unreal3.2.3-SSL.exe
7855
7856 Thanks you for using UnrealIRCd,
7857
7858 The UnrealIRCd team.
7859 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
7860 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
7861
7862 iD8DBQFCNOpi4cPWX+btKqIRAsvaAKCTpH4dWuiy6R0Tcji6vBqmtaw/vQCeI88i
7863 pMrXj8YxFkUgomcKaVaKiFc=
7864 =16DW
7865 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7866
7867
7868 -------------------------------------------------------
7869 SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
7870 Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
7871 Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
7872 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
7873 _______________________________________________
7874 Unreal-users mailing list
7875 Unreal-users@lists.sourceforge.net
7876 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unreal-users
7877
7878
7879
7880
7881 From seth at gonca.net Mon Mar 14 12:30:22 2005
7882 From: seth at gonca.net (Evren)
7883 Date: Mon Mar 14 12:30:29 2005
7884 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices 5.0.40 with db of 5.0.48
7885 Message-ID: <001101c528d4$a66b8810$0100000a@seth>
7886
7887
7888 I have 5.0.48 running but i want to go back to 5.0.40
7889 Will be there any problem about dn compatibility?
7890
7891
7892 Evren
7893 -------------- next part --------------
7894 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
7895 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050314/5df6e9b2/attachment.html
7896 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon Mar 14 13:49:33 2005
7897 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
7898 Date: Mon Mar 14 13:49:41 2005
7899 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices 5.0.40 with db of 5.0.48
7900 In-Reply-To: <001101c528d4$a66b8810$0100000a@seth>
7901 References: <001101c528d4$a66b8810$0100000a@seth>
7902 Message-ID: <423606ED.1010007@frostycoolslug.com>
7903
7904 No, there shouldn't be a problem with regards to compatibility, however,
7905 it could be unwise, due to bugs and any possible security fixes added to
7906 services recently.
7907
7908
7909 /****************************************
7910 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
7911 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
7912 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
7913 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
7914 ****************************************/
7915
7916 Evren wrote:
7917 > I have 5.0.48 running but i want to go back to 5.0.40
7918 > Will be there any problem about dn compatibility?
7919 >
7920 >
7921 > Evren
7922 >
7923 >
7924 >
7925 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
7926 >
7927 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7928 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7929 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7930
7931 From brain at winbot.co.uk Tue Mar 15 09:06:13 2005
7932 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
7933 Date: Tue Mar 15 09:06:19 2005
7934 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
7935 In-Reply-To: <000301c526b4$c1217010$484405d5@server>
7936 References: <000301c526b4$c1217010$484405d5@server>
7937 Message-ID: <42371605.8070907@winbot.co.uk>
7938
7939 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
7940 Hash: SHA1
7941
7942 or, maybe as the docs for +q say, it should just kick the oper :)
7943 +q doesnt protect agaisnt kicks from qlined servers hence why the mode
7944 is 'q'.
7945
7946 Brain
7947
7948 Dionisios K. wrote:
7949 > On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
7950 > If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick
7951 > him.
7952 > But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the oper
7953 > from the channel.
7954 > I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him
7955 > at all.
7956 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
7957 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
7958 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
7959 >
7960 >
7961
7962 - --
7963 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
7964 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
7965 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
7966 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
7967 - --
7968 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
7969 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
7970
7971 iD8DBQFCNxYF0k42Wxli/BARAjw/AJ0d3J+7g8V/g2m/C+aWPe8hiMW3TACeKWlu
7972 U7h5GRkHPL2wou2cPVnDM6s=
7973 =NkUc
7974 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7975 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue Mar 15 11:48:56 2005
7976 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
7977 Date: Tue Mar 15 11:49:30 2005
7978 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
7979 Message-ID: <20050315194857.82018.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
7980
7981 1) its u:lined server. Not qlined 2) i think u mean
7982 unrealircd docs. Here is ircservices mail list 3) im
7983 asking a feature. This is not a bug.
7984 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
7985 <brain@winbot.co.uk> wrote:
7986 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
7987 > Hash: SHA1
7988 >
7989 > or, maybe as the docs for +q say, it should just
7990 kick the oper :)
7991 > +q doesnt protect agaisnt kicks from qlined servers
7992 hence why the mode
7993 > is 'q'.
7994 >
7995 > Brain
7996 >
7997 > Dionisios K. wrote:
7998 > > On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
7999 > > If an oper (with privileges for this) have this
8000 usermode noone can kick
8001 > > him.
8002 > > But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command
8003 services will kick the oper
8004 > > from the channel.
8005 > > I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and
8006 if yes dont kick him
8007 > > at all.
8008 > >
8009 ------------------------------------------------------------------
8010 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription
8011 options, visit:
8012 > >
8013 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8014 > >
8015 > >
8016 >
8017 > - --
8018 > WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
8019 > ChatSpike - The users network:
8020 http://www.chatspike.net
8021 > InspIRCd - Modular IRC server:
8022 http://www.inspircd.org
8023 > Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
8024 > - --
8025 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
8026 > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
8027 >
8028 >
8029 iD8DBQFCNxYF0k42Wxli/BARAjw/AJ0d3J+7g8V/g2m/C+aWPe8hiMW3TACeKWlu
8030 > U7h5GRkHPL2wou2cPVnDM6s=
8031 > =NkUc
8032 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8033 >
8034 ------------------------------------------------------------------
8035 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
8036 visit:
8037 >
8038 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8039
8040
8041 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
8042 From brain at winbot.co.uk Tue Mar 15 11:56:54 2005
8043 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
8044 Date: Tue Mar 15 11:56:47 2005
8045 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8046 In-Reply-To: <20050315194857.82018.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
8047 References: <20050315194857.82018.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
8048 Message-ID: <42373E06.6070504@winbot.co.uk>
8049
8050 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
8051 Hash: SHA1
8052
8053 meh, simple typo. Although, i believe its this way for a reason.
8054
8055 Dionisios K. wrote:
8056 > 1) its u:lined server. Not qlined 2) i think u mean
8057 > unrealircd docs. Here is ircservices mail list 3) im
8058 > asking a feature. This is not a bug.
8059 > --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
8060 > <brain@winbot.co.uk> wrote:
8061 >
8062 > or, maybe as the docs for +q say, it should just
8063 >
8064 >> kick the oper :)
8065 >
8066 > +q doesnt protect agaisnt kicks from qlined servers
8067 >
8068 >> hence why the mode
8069 >
8070 > is 'q'.
8071 >
8072 > Brain
8073 >
8074 > Dionisios K. wrote:
8075 >
8076 >>On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
8077 >>If an oper (with privileges for this) have this
8078 >
8079 >> usermode noone can kick
8080 >
8081 >>him.
8082 >>But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command
8083 >
8084 >> services will kick the oper
8085 >
8086 >>from the channel.
8087 >>I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and
8088 >
8089 >> if yes dont kick him
8090 >
8091 >>at all.
8092 >
8093 >
8094 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
8095 >
8096 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription
8097 >
8098 >> options, visit:
8099 >
8100 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8101 >
8102 >
8103 > --
8104 > WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
8105 > ChatSpike - The users network:
8106 >
8107 >> http://www.chatspike.net
8108 >
8109 > InspIRCd - Modular IRC server:
8110 >
8111 >> http://www.inspircd.org
8112 >
8113 > Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
8114 > --
8115
8116 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8117
8118 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
8119
8120 > visit:
8121
8122 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8123
8124
8125 > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
8126 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8127 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8128 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8129
8130
8131
8132 - --
8133 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
8134 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
8135 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
8136 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
8137 - --
8138 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
8139 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
8140
8141 iD8DBQFCNz4F0k42Wxli/BARAiBcAJ4o1o97Iaue2JoG7DK0xocn00wn1QCeOzvN
8142 OQZRu9SP69eIUlnJ/f0Y0sE=
8143 =vE3A
8144 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8145 From lordbergee at comcast.net Tue Mar 15 15:09:14 2005
8146 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
8147 Date: Tue Mar 15 15:09:31 2005
8148 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8149 In-Reply-To: <000301c526b4$c1217010$484405d5@server>
8150 References: <000301c526b4$c1217010$484405d5@server>
8151 Message-ID: <42376B1A.1010204@comcast.net>
8152
8153 For what it's worth, on my network +q is almost never used, but when it
8154 is it's often during tracking down botnets or users that are otherwise
8155 abusing the network. In this vein it is useful to make it impossible to
8156 get kicked out of a channel where you want to be so you can monitor the
8157 situation. To that end, it would be useful to me if ChanServ noticed
8158 that +q was set on a user and simply denied the kick. I would think
8159 that the OperServ kick function should still ignore +q and proceed with
8160 the kick, but I'd be interested to hear what others think of this idea.
8161
8162 Comments?
8163
8164 Bergee
8165
8166 Dionisios K. wrote:
8167 > On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
8168 > If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick
8169 > him.
8170 > But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the oper
8171 > from the channel.
8172 > I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him
8173 > at all.
8174 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Mar 16 11:16:28 2005
8175 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
8176 Date: Tue Mar 15 18:17:47 2005
8177 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8178 In-Reply-To: <42376B1A.1010204@comcast.net>
8179 Message-ID: <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org>
8180
8181 Isn't there already +a for unkickable (which Services does respect)?
8182 Or does Unreal override +a with +q?
8183
8184 --Andrew Church
8185 achurch@achurch.org
8186 http://achurch.org/
8187
8188 > For what it's worth, on my network +q is almost never used, but when it
8189 >is it's often during tracking down botnets or users that are otherwise
8190 >abusing the network. In this vein it is useful to make it impossible to
8191 >get kicked out of a channel where you want to be so you can monitor the
8192 >situation. To that end, it would be useful to me if ChanServ noticed
8193 >that +q was set on a user and simply denied the kick. I would think
8194 >that the OperServ kick function should still ignore +q and proceed with
8195 >the kick, but I'd be interested to hear what others think of this idea.
8196 >
8197 >Comments?
8198 >
8199 >Bergee
8200 >
8201 >Dionisios K. wrote:
8202 >> On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
8203 >> If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick
8204 >> him.
8205 >> But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the oper
8206 >> from the channel.
8207 >> I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him
8208 >> at all.
8209 >------------------------------------------------------------------
8210 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8211 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8212 From lordbergee at comcast.net Tue Mar 15 18:25:41 2005
8213 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
8214 Date: Tue Mar 15 18:26:39 2005
8215 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8216 In-Reply-To: <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org>
8217 References: <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org>
8218 Message-ID: <42379925.2040400@comcast.net>
8219
8220 Sorry I should have been more clear the first time. :) I was speaking
8221 about the user mode +q, not the channel mode. The unreal help describes
8222 this mode as "q = Only U:lines can kick you (Services Admins/Net Admins
8223 only)". Although the part about service/net admins only isn't quite
8224 true since it could in theory be any oper with the access to that mode
8225 defined in their oper block. But I digress, hopefully that makes my
8226 last post make a bit more sense.
8227
8228 Bergee
8229
8230 P.S. Speaking of the +a and +q channel modes, Unreal now (with prefixes
8231 for +a and +q enabled) treats the channel modes +a and +q more like +h
8232 than just a status marker for not kickable. Except of course they have
8233 more power than +o instead of less. As in if you have +a or +q, you
8234 don't actually need +o to kick a user from the channel, or to give
8235 another user halfops and so on like that. But I suppose that's another
8236 email. :)
8237
8238 Andrew Church wrote:
8239
8240 > Isn't there already +a for unkickable (which Services does respect)?
8241 > Or does Unreal override +a with +q?
8242 >
8243 > --Andrew Church
8244 > achurch@achurch.org
8245 > http://achurch.org/
8246 >
8247 >
8248 >> For what it's worth, on my network +q is almost never used, but when it
8249 >>is it's often during tracking down botnets or users that are otherwise
8250 >>abusing the network. In this vein it is useful to make it impossible to
8251 >>get kicked out of a channel where you want to be so you can monitor the
8252 >>situation. To that end, it would be useful to me if ChanServ noticed
8253 >>that +q was set on a user and simply denied the kick. I would think
8254 >>that the OperServ kick function should still ignore +q and proceed with
8255 >>the kick, but I'd be interested to hear what others think of this idea.
8256 >>
8257 >>Comments?
8258 >>
8259 >>Bergee
8260 >>
8261 >>Dionisios K. wrote:
8262 >>
8263 >>>On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
8264 >>>If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick
8265 >>>him.
8266 >>>But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the oper
8267 >>>from the channel.
8268 >>>I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him
8269 >>>at all.
8270 >>
8271 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
8272 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8273 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8274 >
8275 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8276 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8277 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8278 >
8279 From Rottman3D at yahoo.com Tue Mar 15 18:28:02 2005
8280 From: Rottman3D at yahoo.com (Rottman3D@yahoo.com)
8281 Date: Tue Mar 15 18:28:19 2005
8282 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8283 In-Reply-To: <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org>
8284 References: <42376B1A.1010204@comcast.net> <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org>
8285 Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.2.20050315212108.02353dd0@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
8286
8287 +q is a user mode that allows opers (not necessarily services admins(user
8288 mode +a)) to protect themselves from being kicked from any channel. I am
8289 not sure if Andrew Church means services already respects channel mode +a,
8290 which is channel admin. +q is a mode that Unreal Opers can set on
8291 themselves if they have the can_setq oper flag set in the config.
8292
8293 -R
8294
8295 At 09:16 PM 3/15/2005, Andrew Church wrote:
8296 > Isn't there already +a for unkickable (which Services does respect)?
8297 >Or does Unreal override +a with +q?
8298
8299
8300 From gregk at WWWpages.com Tue Mar 15 18:29:56 2005
8301 From: gregk at WWWpages.com (Gregory King)
8302 Date: Tue Mar 15 18:29:27 2005
8303 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8304 In-Reply-To: <42379925.2040400@comcast.net>
8305 References: <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org> <42379925.2040400@comcast.net>
8306 Message-ID: <3143.69.175.9.85.1110940196.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
8307
8308 pardon my pointing out the obvious, but services is a U: line, therefore
8309 according to the unreal help, chanserv should be able to kick a +q user.
8310
8311
8312
8313 On Tue, March 15, 2005 6:25 pm, Bergee said:
8314 > Sorry I should have been more clear the first time. :) I was speaking
8315 > about the user mode +q, not the channel mode. The unreal help describes
8316 > this mode as "q = Only U:lines can kick you (Services Admins/Net Admins
8317 > only)". Although the part about service/net admins only isn't quite
8318 > true since it could in theory be any oper with the access to that mode
8319 > defined in their oper block. But I digress, hopefully that makes my
8320 > last post make a bit more sense.
8321 >
8322 > Bergee
8323 >
8324 > P.S. Speaking of the +a and +q channel modes, Unreal now (with prefixes
8325 > for +a and +q enabled) treats the channel modes +a and +q more like +h
8326 > than just a status marker for not kickable. Except of course they have
8327 > more power than +o instead of less. As in if you have +a or +q, you
8328 > don't actually need +o to kick a user from the channel, or to give
8329 > another user halfops and so on like that. But I suppose that's another
8330 > email. :)
8331 >
8332 > Andrew Church wrote:
8333 >
8334 >> Isn't there already +a for unkickable (which Services does
8335 >> respect)?
8336 >> Or does Unreal override +a with +q?
8337 >>
8338 >> --Andrew Church
8339 >> achurch@achurch.org
8340 >> http://achurch.org/
8341 >>
8342 >>
8343 >>> For what it's worth, on my network +q is almost never used, but when it
8344 >>>is it's often during tracking down botnets or users that are otherwise
8345 >>>abusing the network. In this vein it is useful to make it impossible to
8346 >>>get kicked out of a channel where you want to be so you can monitor the
8347 >>>situation. To that end, it would be useful to me if ChanServ noticed
8348 >>>that +q was set on a user and simply denied the kick. I would think
8349 >>>that the OperServ kick function should still ignore +q and proceed with
8350 >>>the kick, but I'd be interested to hear what others think of this idea.
8351 >>>
8352 >>>Comments?
8353 >>>
8354 >>>Bergee
8355 >>>
8356 >>>Dionisios K. wrote:
8357 >>>
8358 >>>>On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
8359 >>>>If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick
8360 >>>>him.
8361 >>>>But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the
8362 >>>> oper
8363 >>>>from the channel.
8364 >>>>I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him
8365 >>>>at all.
8366 >>>
8367 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
8368 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8369 >>>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8370 >>
8371 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
8372 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8373 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8374 >>
8375 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8376 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8377 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8378 >
8379
8380 From lordbergee at comcast.net Tue Mar 15 18:33:05 2005
8381 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
8382 Date: Tue Mar 15 18:33:07 2005
8383 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8384 In-Reply-To: <3143.69.175.9.85.1110940196.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
8385 References: <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org> <42379925.2040400@comcast.net>
8386 <3143.69.175.9.85.1110940196.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
8387 Message-ID: <42379AE1.3090609@comcast.net>
8388
8389 Yes, what the original feature request was asking for was that Services
8390 look for that user mode and respect it to some degree by preventing a
8391 regular user from using ChanServ to kick a +q user (read: oper). :)
8392
8393 Bergee
8394
8395 Gregory King wrote:
8396 > pardon my pointing out the obvious, but services is a U: line, therefore
8397 > according to the unreal help, chanserv should be able to kick a +q user.
8398 >
8399 From Rottman3D at yahoo.com Tue Mar 15 18:34:05 2005
8400 From: Rottman3D at yahoo.com (Rottman3D@yahoo.com)
8401 Date: Tue Mar 15 18:34:12 2005
8402 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8403 In-Reply-To: <3143.69.175.9.85.1110940196.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
8404 References: <42379740.44524@msgid.achurch.org> <42379925.2040400@comcast.net>
8405 <3143.69.175.9.85.1110940196.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
8406 Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.2.20050315213050.02353d40@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
8407
8408 Yes, U-lined servers should have the ability to kick +q users but they
8409 should not allow users the power to remove opers. Opers are there to handle
8410 unruly users, as such if an oper has the ability to protect himself from
8411 kicks, in my opinion, services should respect that.
8412
8413 -R
8414
8415
8416 At 09:29 PM 3/15/2005, you wrote:
8417 >pardon my pointing out the obvious, but services is a U: line, therefore
8418 >according to the unreal help, chanserv should be able to kick a +q user.
8419 >
8420 >
8421 >
8422 >On Tue, March 15, 2005 6:25 pm, Bergee said:
8423 > > Sorry I should have been more clear the first time. :) I was
8424 > speaking
8425 > > about the user mode +q, not the channel mode. The unreal help describes
8426 > > this mode as "q = Only U:lines can kick you (Services Admins/Net Admins
8427 > > only)". Although the part about service/net admins only isn't quite
8428 > > true since it could in theory be any oper with the access to that mode
8429 > > defined in their oper block. But I digress, hopefully that makes my
8430 > > last post make a bit more sense.
8431 > >
8432 > > Bergee
8433 > >
8434 > > P.S. Speaking of the +a and +q channel modes, Unreal now (with prefixes
8435 > > for +a and +q enabled) treats the channel modes +a and +q more like +h
8436 > > than just a status marker for not kickable. Except of course they have
8437 > > more power than +o instead of less. As in if you have +a or +q, you
8438 > > don't actually need +o to kick a user from the channel, or to give
8439 > > another user halfops and so on like that. But I suppose that's another
8440 > > email. :)
8441 > >
8442 > > Andrew Church wrote:
8443 > >
8444 > >> Isn't there already +a for unkickable (which Services does
8445 > >> respect)?
8446 > >> Or does Unreal override +a with +q?
8447 > >>
8448 > >> --Andrew Church
8449 > >> achurch@achurch.org
8450 > >>
8451 > >>
8452 > >>
8453 > >>> For what it's worth, on my network +q is almost never used, but
8454 > when it
8455 > >>>is it's often during tracking down botnets or users that are otherwise
8456 > >>>abusing the network. In this vein it is useful to make it impossible to
8457 > >>>get kicked out of a channel where you want to be so you can monitor the
8458 > >>>situation. To that end, it would be useful to me if ChanServ noticed
8459 > >>>that +q was set on a user and simply denied the kick. I would think
8460 > >>>that the OperServ kick function should still ignore +q and proceed with
8461 > >>>the kick, but I'd be interested to hear what others think of this idea.
8462 > >>>
8463 > >>>Comments?
8464 > >>>
8465 > >>>Bergee
8466 > >>>
8467 > >>>Dionisios K. wrote:
8468 > >>>
8469 > >>>>On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
8470 > >>>>If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick
8471 > >>>>him.
8472 > >>>>But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the
8473 > >>>> oper
8474 > >>>>from the channel.
8475 > >>>>I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him
8476 > >>>>at all.
8477 > >>>
8478
8479
8480 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue Mar 15 21:36:32 2005
8481 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
8482 Date: Tue Mar 15 21:43:19 2005
8483 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8484 Message-ID: <20050316053632.49259.qmail@web54407.mail.yahoo.com>
8485
8486 exactly:->
8487 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
8488 <lordbergee@comcast.net> wrote:
8489 > Yes, what the original feature request was asking
8490 for was that Services
8491 > look for that user mode and respect it to some
8492 degree by preventing a
8493 > regular user from using ChanServ to kick a +q user
8494 (read: oper). :)
8495 >
8496 > Bergee
8497 >
8498 > Gregory King wrote:
8499 > > pardon my pointing out the obvious, but services
8500 is a U: line, therefore
8501 > > according to the unreal help, chanserv should be
8502 able to kick a +q user.
8503 > >
8504 >
8505 ------------------------------------------------------------------
8506 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
8507 visit:
8508 >
8509 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8510
8511
8512 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
8513 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Mar 16 22:29:03 2005
8514 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
8515 Date: Wed Mar 16 05:30:02 2005
8516 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
8517 In-Reply-To: <42379925.2040400@comcast.net>
8518 Message-ID: <423834c9.44620@msgid.achurch.org>
8519
8520 > Sorry I should have been more clear the first time. :) I was speaking
8521 >about the user mode +q, not the channel mode. The unreal help describes
8522 >this mode as "q = Only U:lines can kick you (Services Admins/Net Admins
8523 >only)"
8524
8525 Hm, then ChanServ KICK should probably pay attention to that. I'll
8526 think about it.
8527
8528 --Andrew Church
8529 achurch@achurch.org
8530 http://achurch.org/
8531 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Wed Mar 16 09:31:49 2005
8532 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (admin@vonitsanet.gr)
8533 Date: Wed Mar 16 09:32:59 2005
8534 Subject: [IRCServices] restrict modes from mlock
8535 Message-ID: <qVFJSyWhZ0fh.hKqj1gLk@smtp.mail.yahoo.com>
8536
8537 I think many netadmins with unrealircd will agree with this..
8538 I'm asking for a set option to operserv to have the ability to disable specific channel modes from been used with chanserv mlock command..
8539 Im asking for this because with unrealircd i can lock the channel modes i want and i can make them to be always enabled or disabled on all channels.
8540 A u:lined server overrides it (of course).
8541 So if an admin want always +c on all channels any user can add mlock -c and the mode got removed so easy from chanserv..
8542 If i had a way to disable the mode "c" from the mlock everything will be ok..
8543
8544 From dropby21 at hotmail.com Mon Mar 21 23:44:20 2005
8545 From: dropby21 at hotmail.com (dropby dropby)
8546 Date: Mon Mar 21 23:44:29 2005
8547 Subject: [IRCServices] restart lost all of the data in ircserver
8548 Message-ID: <BAY14-F1799CB33F24A6DAD7B38B7DE4E0@phx.gbl>
8549
8550 i install unreal 3.2.3 and ircservices 5.0.49
8551 when i restart ircservices all the information i registered nick channels
8552 are clearing sory for my bad english i will try to explain simply
8553 i register colocated nick and identified it and after i restarted irc
8554 services it says the nickname isn't registered
8555
8556 _________________________________________________________________
8557 Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
8558 http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
8559
8560 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon Mar 21 23:46:10 2005
8561 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
8562 Date: Mon Mar 21 23:48:22 2005
8563 Subject: [IRCServices] restart lost all of the data in ircserver
8564 In-Reply-To: <BAY14-F1799CB33F24A6DAD7B38B7DE4E0@phx.gbl>
8565 References: <BAY14-F1799CB33F24A6DAD7B38B7DE4E0@phx.gbl>
8566 Message-ID: <423FCD42.2080303@frostycoolslug.com>
8567
8568 It takes several minutes for the nicknames to be stored to a database,
8569 try running a /msg operserv update before shutting services down.
8570
8571 Also when shutting services down, us /os shutdown _NOT_ /os quit, as the
8572 help file states:
8573
8574 Causes Services to do an immediate shutdown; databases are
8575 not saved. This command should not be used unless
8576 damage to the in-memory copies of the databases is feared
8577 and they should not be saved. For normal shutdowns, use the
8578 SHUTDOWN command.
8579
8580 /****************************************
8581 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8582 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
8583 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
8584 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8585 ****************************************/
8586
8587 dropby dropby wrote:
8588 > i install unreal 3.2.3 and ircservices 5.0.49
8589 > when i restart ircservices all the information i registered nick
8590 > channels are clearing sory for my bad english i will try to explain simply
8591 > i register colocated nick and identified it and after i restarted irc
8592 > services it says the nickname isn't registered
8593 >
8594 > _________________________________________________________________
8595 > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
8596 > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
8597 >
8598 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8599 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8600 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8601 >
8602 >
8603
8604 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun Mar 27 19:49:20 2005
8605 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
8606 Date: Sun Mar 27 19:49:31 2005
8607 Subject: [IRCServices] A minor.. issue..
8608 Message-ID: <42477EC0.3010800@frostycoolslug.com>
8609
8610
8611 [Mar 27 22:52:39.619309 2005] debug: Received: :OperServ NOTICE HelpServ
8612 :The session limit for your host ^Bragedirc.com^B has been exceeded.
8613 [Mar 27 22:52:39.619369 2005] debug: Received: :OperServ KILL HelpServ
8614 :OperServ (Session limit exceeded)
8615
8616 Maybe some code would be needed to prevent that, ensure that operserv
8617 doesn't kill one of the services, otherwise, a network with a large
8618 number of services from the same host would have problems.. (Especially
8619 if they want a low session limit).
8620
8621 (Although this occured using our InspIRCd module, could you please point
8622 out if that is at fault src @
8623 http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/inspircd/inspircd.c)
8624
8625 Thanks :)
8626
8627 --
8628 /****************************************
8629 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8630 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
8631 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
8632 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8633 ****************************************/
8634
8635 From katarn at shadowfire.org Mon Mar 28 09:16:59 2005
8636 From: katarn at shadowfire.org (Katarn)
8637 Date: Mon Mar 28 09:17:23 2005
8638 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug in NickServ listlinks
8639 Message-ID: <10802.196.2.40.7.1112030219.squirrel@mail.zagamers.za.net>
8640
8641
8642 Hi,
8643
8644 It was brought to my attention by a user the other day, that NickServ's
8645 listlinks feature works for any nickname, without identifying for the
8646 nick. By default, only services operators or above are supposed to be able
8647 to do this I believe.
8648 Basically, any person can come on with any nick that they want to see all
8649 the linked nicks for, and use "/msg nickserv listlinks" to see all the
8650 nicknames linked to that nick, if they have not identified at all.
8651 -Katarn
8652
8653
8654 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon Mar 28 09:42:58 2005
8655 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
8656 Date: Mon Mar 28 09:42:58 2005
8657 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug in NickServ listlinks
8658 In-Reply-To: <10802.196.2.40.7.1112030219.squirrel@mail.zagamers.za.net>
8659 References: <10802.196.2.40.7.1112030219.squirrel@mail.zagamers.za.net>
8660 Message-ID: <42484222.3070707@frostycoolslug.com>
8661
8662 Well spotted, If your looking for an immediate fix, find
8663 ircservices-5.0.xx/modules/nickserv/link.c
8664
8665 and add the following at line 197
8666
8667 --- CODE SNIPPIT ---
8668 } else if (!user_identified(u)) {
8669 notice_lang(s_NickServ, u, NICK_IDENTIFY_REQUIRED, s_NickServ);
8670 return;
8671
8672 --- END CODE SNIPPIT ---
8673
8674 (You should be able to paste all that, including the line break into
8675 like 197, and everything will fall into alignment)
8676
8677 I'm sure andy will include this fix in the next release of services :)
8678 /****************************************
8679 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8680 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
8681 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
8682 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8683 ****************************************/
8684
8685 Katarn wrote:
8686 > Hi,
8687 >
8688 > It was brought to my attention by a user the other day, that NickServ's
8689 > listlinks feature works for any nickname, without identifying for the
8690 > nick. By default, only services operators or above are supposed to be able
8691 > to do this I believe.
8692 > Basically, any person can come on with any nick that they want to see all
8693 > the linked nicks for, and use "/msg nickserv listlinks" to see all the
8694 > nicknames linked to that nick, if they have not identified at all.
8695 > -Katarn
8696 >
8697 >
8698 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8699 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8700 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8701 >
8702 >
8703
8704 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Mon Mar 28 10:09:30 2005
8705 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
8706 Date: Mon Mar 28 10:09:26 2005
8707 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug in NickServ listlinks
8708 In-Reply-To: <42484222.3070707@frostycoolslug.com>
8709 References: <10802.196.2.40.7.1112030219.squirrel@mail.zagamers.za.net>
8710 <42484222.3070707@frostycoolslug.com>
8711 Message-ID: <4248485A.70809@frostycoolslug.com>
8712
8713 My mistake, the code went in the wrong place..
8714
8715 Find the Section:
8716
8717 -- Code Snippit (Line 208) --
8718 if (!(ni = u->ni) || !(ngi = u->ngi) || ngi ==
8719 NICKGROUPINFO_INVALID) {
8720 notice_lang(s_NickServ, u, NICK_NOT_REGISTERED);
8721 return;
8722 }
8723 -- Code Snippit --
8724
8725 And replace it with:
8726
8727 -- Code Snippit --
8728 if (!(ni = u->ni) || !(ngi = u->ngi) || ngi ==
8729 NICKGROUPINFO_INVALID) {
8730 notice_lang(s_NickServ, u, NICK_NOT_REGISTERED);
8731 return;
8732 } else if (!user_identified(u)) {
8733 notice_lang(s_NickServ, u, NICK_IDENTIFY_REQUIRED, s_NickServ);
8734 return;
8735 }
8736
8737 -- End Code Snippit --
8738
8739 and remove the text on line 197
8740
8741 My appoligies for the mixup.
8742
8743 --
8744 With this new fix in place, if a user attempts to /ns listlinks they get:
8745
8746 (19:04:37) ?? [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] Password
8747 authentication required for that command.
8748 (19:04:37) ?? [ NickServ (services@chatspike.net) ] Retry after typing
8749 /msg NickServ IDENTIFY password.
8750
8751 (I have an annoying habit of not testing code before submitting it :/)
8752
8753 Sorry again.
8754
8755
8756 /****************************************
8757 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8758 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
8759 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
8760 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8761 ****************************************/
8762
8763 Craig McLure wrote:
8764 > Well spotted, If your looking for an immediate fix, find
8765 > ircservices-5.0.xx/modules/nickserv/link.c
8766 >
8767 > and add the following at line 197
8768 >
8769 > --- CODE SNIPPIT ---
8770 > } else if (!user_identified(u)) {
8771 > notice_lang(s_NickServ, u, NICK_IDENTIFY_REQUIRED, s_NickServ);
8772 > return;
8773 >
8774 > --- END CODE SNIPPIT ---
8775 >
8776 > (You should be able to paste all that, including the line break into
8777 > like 197, and everything will fall into alignment)
8778 >
8779 > I'm sure andy will include this fix in the next release of services :)
8780 > /****************************************
8781 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
8782 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
8783 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
8784 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
8785 > ****************************************/
8786 >
8787 > Katarn wrote:
8788 >
8789 >> Hi,
8790 >>
8791 >> It was brought to my attention by a user the other day, that NickServ's
8792 >> listlinks feature works for any nickname, without identifying for the
8793 >> nick. By default, only services operators or above are supposed to be
8794 >> able
8795 >> to do this I believe.
8796 >> Basically, any person can come on with any nick that they want to see all
8797 >> the linked nicks for, and use "/msg nickserv listlinks" to see all the
8798 >> nicknames linked to that nick, if they have not identified at all.
8799 >> -Katarn
8800 >>
8801 >>
8802 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
8803 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8804 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8805 >>
8806 >>
8807 >
8808 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8809 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8810 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8811 >
8812 >
8813
8814 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Mon Mar 28 11:47:58 2005
8815 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
8816 Date: Mon Mar 28 11:48:15 2005
8817 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
8818 In-Reply-To: <20050328034935.C0EBCF8A3F3@sakura.ian-justman.com>
8819 Message-ID: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net>
8820
8821 Same issue noted with the alpha version of NeoStats 3.
8822
8823 I'm thinking that Services should automatically exempt clients on U:lined
8824 servers from session limits.
8825 ______________________________________________________________
8826 http://www.webmail.co.za the South African FREE email service
8827 From medice at gmx.at Mon Mar 28 13:22:41 2005
8828 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
8829 Date: Mon Mar 28 13:21:15 2005
8830 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
8831 In-Reply-To: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net>
8832 References: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net>
8833 Message-ID: <424875A1.5050509@gmx.at>
8834
8835 i personally think the responsible admins could set approptiate
8836 session-limit-exceptions suitable for the present needs...
8837
8838 regards
8839 Medice
8840 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Mar 29 10:48:33 2005
8841 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
8842 Date: Mon Mar 28 17:48:52 2005
8843 Subject: [IRCServices] Bug in NickServ listlinks
8844 In-Reply-To: <10802.196.2.40.7.1112030219.squirrel@mail.zagamers.za.net>
8845 Message-ID: <4248b3fc.11347@msgid.achurch.org>
8846
8847 Fixed, thanks for the report.
8848
8849 --Andrew Church
8850 achurch@achurch.org
8851 http://achurch.org/
8852
8853 >
8854 >Hi,
8855 >
8856 >It was brought to my attention by a user the other day, that NickServ's
8857 >listlinks feature works for any nickname, without identifying for the
8858 >nick. By default, only services operators or above are supposed to be able
8859 >to do this I believe.
8860 >Basically, any person can come on with any nick that they want to see all
8861 >the linked nicks for, and use "/msg nickserv listlinks" to see all the
8862 >nicknames linked to that nick, if they have not identified at all.
8863 >-Katarn
8864 >
8865 >
8866 >------------------------------------------------------------------
8867 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8868 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8869 From dnb at majestic-liaisons.com Mon Mar 28 20:08:03 2005
8870 From: dnb at majestic-liaisons.com (DeadNotBuried)
8871 Date: Mon Mar 28 20:08:43 2005
8872 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
8873 References: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net>
8874 Message-ID: <000d01c53414$ead5d640$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
8875
8876 Kieron Thwaites Wrote :
8877 > Same issue noted with the alpha version of NeoStats 3.
8878 >
8879 > I'm thinking that Services should automatically exempt clients on U:lined
8880 > servers from session limits.
8881
8882 even Neostats 2.5 series had the same problem along with any services that
8883 introduce a number of Pseudo Clients, so session exceptions must have been
8884 added for them if they were connected.
8885
8886 the problem is finding out what are U-lined servers, as U-lines are not
8887 propagated by most IRCd's. The only real solution is adding an entry to the
8888 OperServ Exceptions list exempting the hosts used by the Pseudo Clients.
8889
8890 DNB
8891
8892
8893 From jerome at gmanmi.tv Mon Mar 28 23:50:59 2005
8894 From: jerome at gmanmi.tv (Jerome Macaranas)
8895 Date: Mon Mar 28 23:51:48 2005
8896 Subject: [IRCServices] Channel expiration
8897 Message-ID: <200503291551.00196.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
8898
8899 hi,
8900
8901 i was wondering is it possible to do a NOEXPIRE on selective channels?
8902
8903 tia,
8904 From brain at winbot.co.uk Mon Mar 28 23:55:01 2005
8905 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
8906 Date: Mon Mar 28 23:54:54 2005
8907 Subject: [IRCServices] Channel expiration
8908 In-Reply-To: <200503291551.00196.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
8909 References: <200503291551.00196.jerome@gmanmi.tv>
8910 Message-ID: <424909D5.9010609@winbot.co.uk>
8911
8912 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
8913 Hash: SHA1
8914
8915 yes probably with /chanserv set #channel noexpire on.
8916
8917 Jerome Macaranas wrote:
8918 > hi,
8919 >
8920 > i was wondering is it possible to do a NOEXPIRE on selective channels?
8921 >
8922 > tia,
8923 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8924 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8925 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8926 >
8927 >
8928
8929 - --
8930 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
8931 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
8932 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
8933 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
8934 - --
8935 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
8936 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
8937
8938 iD8DBQFCSQnV0k42Wxli/BARAsGPAJ0bie1WcQ9dJZV26oqw+qH+/ti9XwCeNODM
8939 N89mRFnZ/kpSPuMAuAZe/so=
8940 =CJ8Y
8941 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8942 From xxx.coder at gmail.com Tue Mar 29 03:06:40 2005
8943 From: xxx.coder at gmail.com (ongeboren)
8944 Date: Tue Mar 29 03:07:01 2005
8945 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
8946 In-Reply-To: <000d01c53414$ead5d640$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
8947 References: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net>
8948 <000d01c53414$ead5d640$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
8949 Message-ID: <ce6d5360050329030654b3afb1@mail.gmail.com>
8950
8951 Why don't you introduce the pseudo clients with different hostnames..
8952 All they would have in common is only the server they're from.
8953
8954
8955 On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:38:03 +0930, DeadNotBuried
8956 <dnb@majestic-liaisons.com> wrote:
8957 > Kieron Thwaites Wrote :
8958 > > Same issue noted with the alpha version of NeoStats 3.
8959 > >
8960 > > I'm thinking that Services should automatically exempt clients on U:lined
8961 > > servers from session limits.
8962 >
8963 > even Neostats 2.5 series had the same problem along with any services that
8964 > introduce a number of Pseudo Clients, so session exceptions must have been
8965 > added for them if they were connected.
8966 >
8967 > the problem is finding out what are U-lined servers, as U-lines are not
8968 > propagated by most IRCd's. The only real solution is adding an entry to the
8969 > OperServ Exceptions list exempting the hosts used by the Pseudo Clients.
8970 >
8971 > DNB
8972 >
8973 >
8974 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
8975 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
8976 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
8977 >
8978
8979
8980 --
8981 Evlogi Petrov - ongeboren@UniBG
8982 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Tue Mar 29 15:51:32 2005
8983 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
8984 Date: Tue Mar 29 15:52:23 2005
8985 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
8986 In-Reply-To: <ce6d5360050329030654b3afb1@mail.gmail.com>
8987 References: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net> <000d01c53414$ead5d640$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
8988 <ce6d5360050329030654b3afb1@mail.gmail.com>
8989 Message-ID: <4249EA04.8090709@frostycoolslug.com>
8990
8991 I think you have all missed the point in this post completly.
8992
8993 I wasn't talking about services killing neostats pseudos (Hell, as far
8994 as i'm concirned, thats good behaviour, and what exceptions are for).
8995 I'm talking about services KILLING ITS OWN PSUEODCLIENTS (ya know, like
8996 Operserv killing Nickserv / Chanserv / HelpServ) because their host has
8997 reached the session limit. I am unsure if this is a bug in our
8998 IRCServices module, or a problem with the core itself.
8999
9000 Note: This seems to be our fault, we echo connections back to the local
9001 server (something to do with the mesh iirc), making services aware of
9002 their existance. We'll fix it.
9003
9004 /****************************************
9005 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9006 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
9007 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
9008 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9009 ****************************************/
9010
9011 ongeboren wrote:
9012
9013 >>Kieron Thwaites Wrote :
9014 >>
9015 >>>Same issue noted with the alpha version of NeoStats 3.
9016 >>>
9017 >>>I'm thinking that Services should automatically exempt clients on U:lined
9018 >>>servers from session limits.
9019 >>
9020 >>even Neostats 2.5 series had the same problem along with any services that
9021 >>introduce a number of Pseudo Clients, so session exceptions must have been
9022 >>added for them if they were connected.
9023 >>
9024 >>the problem is finding out what are U-lined servers, as U-lines are not
9025 >>propagated by most IRCd's. The only real solution is adding an entry to the
9026 >>OperServ Exceptions list exempting the hosts used by the Pseudo Clients.
9027 >>
9028 >>DNB
9029 >>
9030 >>
9031 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
9032 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9033 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9034 >>
9035 >
9036 >
9037 >
9038
9039 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 31 02:45:44 2005
9040 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9041 Date: Wed Mar 30 09:46:29 2005
9042 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.50 released
9043 Message-ID: <424ae5e3.54747@msgid.achurch.org>
9044
9045 Services 5.0.50 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
9046
9047 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
9048 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
9049
9050 12cea66c42ac0c762692272fff36df22 ircservices-5.0.50.tar.gz
9051 b3137b27b89fa0db99bcc4bab5fd376f ircservices-5.0.50.diff.gz
9052 6eb6215d8063dbaa5ff5a468054fde2f ircservices-5.0.50-1.i386.rpm
9053 a7bcc2c4e26797092a9994fa4931ffcd ircservices_5.0.50-1_i386.deb
9054
9055 The mirrors should have it shortly.
9056
9057 Changes in version 5.0.50
9058 -------------------------
9059 2005/03/29 Fixed security hole in NickServ LISTLINKS allowing any user
9060 to view a nick's links. Reported by
9061 <katarn@shadowfire.org>
9062
9063 --Andrew Church
9064 achurch@achurch.org
9065 http://achurch.org/
9066 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Wed Mar 30 19:47:18 2005
9067 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
9068 Date: Wed Mar 30 19:47:30 2005
9069 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
9070 In-Reply-To: <4249EA04.8090709@frostycoolslug.com>
9071 References: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net>
9072 <000d01c53414$ead5d640$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
9073 <ce6d5360050329030654b3afb1@mail.gmail.com>
9074 <4249EA04.8090709@frostycoolslug.com>
9075 Message-ID: <b19eae4e05033019477982d3b4@mail.gmail.com>
9076
9077 Making services aware of themselves?! Whoa, that's certainly... interesting :P
9078
9079
9080 On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:51:32 +0100, Craig McLure
9081 <Craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
9082 > I think you have all missed the point in this post completly.
9083 >
9084 > I wasn't talking about services killing neostats pseudos (Hell, as far
9085 > as i'm concirned, thats good behaviour, and what exceptions are for).
9086 > I'm talking about services KILLING ITS OWN PSUEODCLIENTS (ya know, like
9087 > Operserv killing Nickserv / Chanserv / HelpServ) because their host has
9088 > reached the session limit. I am unsure if this is a bug in our
9089 > IRCServices module, or a problem with the core itself.
9090 >
9091 > Note: This seems to be our fault, we echo connections back to the local
9092 > server (something to do with the mesh iirc), making services aware of
9093 > their existance. We'll fix it.
9094 >
9095 > /****************************************
9096 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9097 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
9098 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
9099 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9100 > ****************************************/
9101 >
9102 > ongeboren wrote:
9103 >
9104 > >>Kieron Thwaites Wrote :
9105 > >>
9106 > >>>Same issue noted with the alpha version of NeoStats 3.
9107 > >>>
9108 > >>>I'm thinking that Services should automatically exempt clients on U:lined
9109 > >>>servers from session limits.
9110 > >>
9111 > >>even Neostats 2.5 series had the same problem along with any services that
9112 > >>introduce a number of Pseudo Clients, so session exceptions must have been
9113 > >>added for them if they were connected.
9114 > >>
9115 > >>the problem is finding out what are U-lined servers, as U-lines are not
9116 > >>propagated by most IRCd's. The only real solution is adding an entry to the
9117 > >>OperServ Exceptions list exempting the hosts used by the Pseudo Clients.
9118 > >>
9119 > >>DNB
9120 > >>
9121 > >>
9122 > >>------------------------------------------------------------------
9123 > >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9124 > >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9125 > >>
9126 > >
9127 > >
9128 > >
9129 >
9130 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9131 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9132 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9133 >
9134
9135
9136 --
9137 --w00t
9138 From gregk at WWWpages.com Wed Mar 30 19:59:23 2005
9139 From: gregk at WWWpages.com (Gregory King)
9140 Date: Wed Mar 30 19:58:40 2005
9141 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
9142 In-Reply-To: <b19eae4e05033019477982d3b4@mail.gmail.com>
9143 References: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net>
9144 <000d01c53414$ead5d640$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
9145 <ce6d5360050329030654b3afb1@mail.gmail.com>
9146 <4249EA04.8090709@frostycoolslug.com>
9147 <b19eae4e05033019477982d3b4@mail.gmail.com>
9148 Message-ID: <3765.69.175.9.85.1112241563.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
9149
9150 were not we warned of the dangers of this in the Terminator movies???
9151
9152 :>
9153
9154
9155
9156
9157 On Wed, March 30, 2005 7:47 pm, w00t said:
9158 > Making services aware of themselves?! Whoa, that's certainly...
9159 > interesting :P
9160 >
9161 >
9162 > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:51:32 +0100, Craig McLure
9163 > <Craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
9164 >> I think you have all missed the point in this post completly.
9165 >>
9166 >> I wasn't talking about services killing neostats pseudos (Hell, as far
9167 >> as i'm concirned, thats good behaviour, and what exceptions are for).
9168 >> I'm talking about services KILLING ITS OWN PSUEODCLIENTS (ya know, like
9169 >> Operserv killing Nickserv / Chanserv / HelpServ) because their host has
9170 >> reached the session limit. I am unsure if this is a bug in our
9171 >> IRCServices module, or a problem with the core itself.
9172 >>
9173 >> Note: This seems to be our fault, we echo connections back to the local
9174 >> server (something to do with the mesh iirc), making services aware of
9175 >> their existance. We'll fix it.
9176 >>
9177 >> /****************************************
9178 >> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9179 >> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
9180 >> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
9181 >> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9182 >> ****************************************/
9183 >>
9184 >> ongeboren wrote:
9185 >>
9186 >> >>Kieron Thwaites Wrote :
9187 >> >>
9188 >> >>>Same issue noted with the alpha version of NeoStats 3.
9189 >> >>>
9190 >> >>>I'm thinking that Services should automatically exempt clients on
9191 >> U:lined
9192 >> >>>servers from session limits.
9193 >> >>
9194 >> >>even Neostats 2.5 series had the same problem along with any services
9195 >> that
9196 >> >>introduce a number of Pseudo Clients, so session exceptions must have
9197 >> been
9198 >> >>added for them if they were connected.
9199 >> >>
9200 >> >>the problem is finding out what are U-lined servers, as U-lines are
9201 >> not
9202 >> >>propagated by most IRCd's. The only real solution is adding an entry
9203 >> to the
9204 >> >>OperServ Exceptions list exempting the hosts used by the Pseudo
9205 >> Clients.
9206 >> >>
9207 >> >>DNB
9208 >> >>
9209 >> >>
9210 >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------
9211 >> >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9212 >> >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9213 >> >>
9214 >> >
9215 >> >
9216 >> >
9217 >>
9218 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
9219 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9220 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9221 >>
9222 >
9223 >
9224 > --
9225 > --w00t
9226 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9227 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9228 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9229 >
9230
9231 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Mar 30 20:10:20 2005
9232 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
9233 Date: Wed Mar 30 20:10:29 2005
9234 Subject: [IRCServices] Re: A minor.. issue..
9235 In-Reply-To: <3765.69.175.9.85.1112241563.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
9236 References: <web-690727762@mail01.infosat.net> <000d01c53414$ead5d640$0100a8c0@dnblaptop> <ce6d5360050329030654b3afb1@mail.gmail.com> <4249EA04.8090709@frostycoolslug.com> <b19eae4e05033019477982d3b4@mail.gmail.com>
9237 <3765.69.175.9.85.1112241563.squirrel@webmail.wwwpages.com>
9238 Message-ID: <424B782C.2080105@frostycoolslug.com>
9239
9240 Ok, can we please stop the slightly spammy emailing.. Thanks.
9241
9242 After giving w00t a bashing, he responded with a slightly more useful query:
9243
9244 > I did have a point to that email, I just didn't really make it clear.
9245 > My point was, if the IRCd is introducing nickserv etc back to
9246 > services, wouldn't it b e a way for services to track themselves being
9247 > in channels etc?
9248
9249 I'll answer that here, as it seems relevent :p
9250 --
9251
9252 Yes it is, however, it had some unforseen conciquences, including
9253 Operserv killing other pseudos for breaking the exception limits etc
9254 (When it broke the limits, it got into an introdude_user() loop
9255 attempting to 'respawn' the clients onto the server and them being
9256 killed straight afterwards).
9257
9258 Services are designed to not be known to exist for a reason, this is
9259 just one of them (I'm sure there are more).
9260
9261 What happened to us was an accident, based on our linking protocols, its
9262 undesigned behaviour, and services didn't know how to correctly respond
9263 to it, so went nuts.
9264
9265 Services being aware that they exist could also result in a LOT of
9266 redundant data beeing sent back to them, you must remember, Services
9267 attmpts to parse EVERYTHING that is sent to them via the IRCd, and
9268 because its not been programmed to allow for this, it could easily cause
9269 overflows / segfaults (Although from my experiance with the code, i
9270 doubt this would happen, but the fact recieving this crap isn't in its
9271 design, bad things could happen).
9272
9273 Its for reasons such as this, that botserv isn't very possible with the
9274 current services core.
9275
9276
9277 /****************************************
9278 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9279 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
9280 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
9281 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9282 ****************************************/
9283
9284 Gregory King wrote:
9285 > were not we warned of the dangers of this in the Terminator movies???
9286 >
9287 > :>
9288 >
9289 >
9290 >
9291 >
9292 > On Wed, March 30, 2005 7:47 pm, w00t said:
9293 >
9294 >>Making services aware of themselves?! Whoa, that's certainly...
9295 >>interesting :P
9296 >>
9297 >>
9298 >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:51:32 +0100, Craig McLure
9299 >><Craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
9300 >>
9301 >>>I think you have all missed the point in this post completly.
9302 >>>
9303 >>>I wasn't talking about services killing neostats pseudos (Hell, as far
9304 >>>as i'm concirned, thats good behaviour, and what exceptions are for).
9305 >>>I'm talking about services KILLING ITS OWN PSUEODCLIENTS (ya know, like
9306 >>>Operserv killing Nickserv / Chanserv / HelpServ) because their host has
9307 >>>reached the session limit. I am unsure if this is a bug in our
9308 >>>IRCServices module, or a problem with the core itself.
9309 >>>
9310 >>>Note: This seems to be our fault, we echo connections back to the local
9311 >>>server (something to do with the mesh iirc), making services aware of
9312 >>>their existance. We'll fix it.
9313 >>>
9314 >>>/****************************************
9315 >>> * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9316 >>> * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
9317 >>> * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
9318 >>> * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9319 >>> ****************************************/
9320 >>>
9321 >>>ongeboren wrote:
9322 >>>
9323 >>>
9324 >>>>>Kieron Thwaites Wrote :
9325 >>>>>
9326 >>>>>
9327 >>>>>>Same issue noted with the alpha version of NeoStats 3.
9328 >>>>>>
9329 >>>>>>I'm thinking that Services should automatically exempt clients on
9330 >>>
9331 >>>U:lined
9332 >>>
9333 >>>>>>servers from session limits.
9334 >>>>>
9335 >>>>>even Neostats 2.5 series had the same problem along with any services
9336 >>>
9337 >>>that
9338 >>>
9339 >>>>>introduce a number of Pseudo Clients, so session exceptions must have
9340 >>>
9341 >>>been
9342 >>>
9343 >>>>>added for them if they were connected.
9344 >>>>>
9345 >>>>>the problem is finding out what are U-lined servers, as U-lines are
9346 >>>
9347 >>>not
9348 >>>
9349 >>>>>propagated by most IRCd's. The only real solution is adding an entry
9350 >>>
9351 >>>to the
9352 >>>
9353 >>>>>OperServ Exceptions list exempting the hosts used by the Pseudo
9354 >>>
9355 >>>Clients.
9356 >>>
9357 >>>>>DNB
9358 >>>>>
9359 >>>>>
9360 >>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------
9361 >>>>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9362 >>>>>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9363 >>>>>
9364 >>>>
9365 >>>>
9366 >>>>
9367 >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
9368 >>>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9369 >>>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9370 >>>
9371 >>
9372 >>
9373 >>--
9374 >>--w00t
9375 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
9376 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9377 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9378 >>
9379 >
9380 >
9381 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9382 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9383 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9384 >
9385 >
9386
9387 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 31 16:21:38 2005
9388 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9389 Date: Wed Mar 30 23:24:18 2005
9390 Subject: [IRCServices] newbie kickstart document
9391 In-Reply-To: <1109639711.6629.57.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
9392 Message-ID: <424ba59b.71056@msgid.achurch.org>
9393
9394 >Do you guys happen to have a "newbie kickstart document" to speed up
9395 >things for a newcomer? Essentially, how to bootstrap a small population
9396 >of admins, create a few channels and assign access permissions and
9397 >things like that.
9398
9399 Judging from the lack of response, it looks like nobody's written
9400 anything like that. Personally, I'd recommend taking the time to just read
9401 the manual; in particular, section 3 is a good description of exactly how
9402 Services works and what you need to keep track of.
9403
9404 >Do i have to login as SuperUser and create admins? If yes, then i should
9405 >probably password-protect that nick pretty soon now, right?
9406
9407 Yes, you do, and yes, you should make sure you register the nick
9408 before anyone else does.
9409
9410 --Andrew Church
9411 achurch@achurch.org
9412 http://achurch.org/
9413 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 31 16:52:36 2005
9414 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9415 Date: Wed Mar 30 23:52:55 2005
9416 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
9417 In-Reply-To: <20050301065514.34948.qmail@web54409.mail.yahoo.com>
9418 Message-ID: <424bac52.71200@msgid.achurch.org>
9419
9420 Added for 5.0.51.
9421
9422 --Andrew Church
9423 achurch@achurch.org
9424 http://achurch.org/
9425
9426 >on many ircds +R chmode is supported by now. I thing
9427 >services should enforce it on 1st user joins the
9428 >channel like +OA and +z on Unrealircd
9429 >
9430 >=====
9431 >Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
9432 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9433 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9434 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9435 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 31 17:37:12 2005
9436 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9437 Date: Thu Mar 31 00:37:41 2005
9438 Subject: [IRCServices] NickServ Suspend (bug?)
9439 In-Reply-To: <002801c52110$e8078f10$2f4405d5@server>
9440 Message-ID: <424bb6ce.74576@msgid.achurch.org>
9441
9442 Fixed for 5.0.51 (and please don't use HTML).
9443
9444 --Andrew Church
9445 achurch@achurch.org
9446 http://achurch.org/
9447
9448 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
9449 >
9450 >--===============0166732631==
9451 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
9452 > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01C52121.A9B388C0"
9453 >
9454 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
9455 >
9456 >------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C52121.A9B388C0
9457 >Content-Type: text/plain;
9458 > charset="iso-8859-7"
9459 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
9460 >
9461 >If i forbid a nickname and IF it the nick is used the time i forbid it =
9462 >NickServ will show this on the user:
9463 >
9464 >-NickServ- This nickname may not be used. Please choose another one. If =
9465 >you do not change your nickname within one minute, it will be changed =
9466 >automatically.
9467 >
9468 >
9469 >BUT this is not happening with suspended nicknames.=20
9470 >If i suspend a nickname and the nickname is used at the moment his owner =
9471 >can use it until he will be disconnect or change his nick to another one.
9472 >------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C52121.A9B388C0
9473 >Content-Type: text/html;
9474 > charset="iso-8859-7"
9475 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
9476 >
9477 ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
9478 ><HTML><HEAD>
9479 ><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
9480 >charset=3Diso-8859-7">
9481 ><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=3DGENERATOR>
9482 ><STYLE></STYLE>
9483 ></HEAD>
9484 ><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
9485 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If i forbid a nickname and IF it the =
9486 >nick is used=20
9487 >the time i forbid it NickServ will show this on the user:</FONT></DIV>
9488 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
9489 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>-NickServ- This nickname may not be =
9490 >used. Please=20
9491 >choose another one. If you do not change your nickname within one =
9492 >minute, it=20
9493 >will be changed automatically.</FONT></DIV>
9494 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
9495 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
9496 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>BUT this is not happening with =
9497 >suspended nicknames.=20
9498 ></FONT></DIV>
9499 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If i suspend a nickname and the =
9500 >nickname is used at=20
9501 >the moment&nbsp;his owner can use it until he&nbsp;will be disconnect or =
9502 >change=20
9503 >his nick to another one.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
9504 >
9505 >------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C52121.A9B388C0--
9506 >
9507 >
9508 >--===============0166732631==
9509 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
9510 >MIME-Version: 1.0
9511 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
9512 >Content-Disposition: inline
9513 >
9514 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9515 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9516 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9517 >--===============0166732631==--
9518 >
9519 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 31 18:06:08 2005
9520 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9521 Date: Thu Mar 31 01:20:31 2005
9522 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ KICK Command
9523 In-Reply-To: <000301c526b4$c1217010$484405d5@server>
9524 Message-ID: <424bc0d9.76600@msgid.achurch.org>
9525
9526 >On UnrealIRCD the +q usermode is supported.
9527 >If an oper (with privileges for this) have this usermode noone can kick him.
9528 >But if someone use the ChanServ KICK command services will kick the oper
9529 >from the channel.
9530 >I think ChanServ should check if an oper is +q and if yes dont kick him at
9531 >all.
9532
9533 Rather than relying on Unreal's +q, I'm going to make it so ChanServ
9534 KICK refuses to kick anyone with Services operator privilege (or above).
9535 Just make sure anyone you give +q privilege to has Services operator
9536 privileges as well and you'll have no problem.
9537
9538 --Andrew Church
9539 achurch@achurch.org
9540 http://achurch.org/
9541 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 31 18:29:59 2005
9542 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9543 Date: Thu Mar 31 01:36:01 2005
9544 Subject: [IRCServices] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) Missing @ in
9545 mask: *
9546 In-Reply-To: <007601c527c2$ac92aec0$0100000a@seth>
9547 Message-ID: <424bc479.76747@msgid.achurch.org>
9548
9549 >[Mar 09 17:33:45.183279 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org TKL - G =
9550 >* pc-010.diamond.vaslui.rdsnet.ro services.turkirc.o$
9551 >[Mar 09 17:33:45.183480 2005] debug: Sent: :services.turkirc.org TKL - G =
9552 >* 141.85.1.46 services.turkirc.org
9553 >[Mar 09 17:33:45.183638 2005] operserv/akill: BUG: (cancel_akill) =
9554 >Missing @ in mask: *
9555 >[Mar 09 17:33:45.184189 2005] PANIC! signal 6 (no buffer)
9556
9557 I can't reproduce this. There shouldn't be any way to get an autokill
9558 of "*" into the database anyway, unless you imported databases from another
9559 program (and convert-db should check for this as well, but that's a separate
9560 issue). Have you modified Services, or are you using third-party modules?
9561 If not, I'll need a backtrace (see FAQ Z.3.5) to try and find this.
9562
9563 --Andrew Church
9564 achurch@achurch.org
9565 http://achurch.org/
9566 From achurch at achurch.org Thu Mar 31 18:36:08 2005
9567 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9568 Date: Thu Mar 31 01:36:30 2005
9569 Subject: [IRCServices] restrict modes from mlock
9570 In-Reply-To: <qVFJSyWhZ0fh.hKqj1gLk@smtp.mail.yahoo.com>
9571 Message-ID: <424bc49a.76761@msgid.achurch.org>
9572
9573 This issue has been brought up before; I'm considering it for 5.1, but
9574 it's not high priority.
9575
9576 --Andrew Church
9577 achurch@achurch.org
9578 http://achurch.org/
9579
9580 >I think many netadmins with unrealircd will agree with this..
9581 >I'm asking for a set option to operserv to have the ability to disable specific channel modes from been used with chanserv mlock command..
9582 >Im asking for this because with unrealircd i can lock the channel modes i want and i can make them to be always enabled or disabled on all channels.
9583 >A u:lined server overrides it (of course).
9584 >So if an admin want always +c on all channels any user can add mlock -c and the mode got removed so easy from chanserv..
9585 >If i had a way to disable the mode "c" from the mlock everything will be ok..
9586 >
9587 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9588 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9589 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9590 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Apr 2 17:29:00 2005
9591 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9592 Date: Sat Apr 30 14:03:11 2005
9593 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.51 released
9594 Message-ID: <424f46d1.04244@msgid.achurch.org>
9595
9596 Services 5.0.51 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
9597
9598 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
9599 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
9600
9601 0c5d5fa6be1798fbe25ca9a728ac0839 ircservices-5.0.51.tar.gz
9602 118701b5c92c3fe13447c40ffbec52e0 ircservices-5.0.51.diff.gz
9603 4aff1944840953e4a6700000d4954f8c ircservices-5.0.51-1.i386.rpm
9604 9999afd340b6617e64cb3ec4f26608ed ircservices_5.0.51-1_i386.deb
9605
9606 The mirrors should have it shortly.
9607
9608 This release addresses the problems mentioned recently on the mailing
9609 list, as well as a minor security issue allowing users to keep usermode +r
9610 after their nick was suspended or forbidden. convert-db has also been
9611 improved to avoid letting bad data (such as autokills with missing username
9612 or hostname parts) into the database.
9613
9614 Changes in version 5.0.51
9615 -------------------------
9616 2005/04/02 convert-db now checks for more potential problems with the
9617 imported databases before writing out the XML data.
9618 2005/04/02 Fixed bugs when converting databases from old versions of
9619 PTlink Services.
9620 2005/04/01 Fixed handling of links to forbidden nicks when converting
9621 Auspice databases.
9622 2005/03/31 ChanServ KICK no longer allows Services opers to be kicked.
9623 2005/03/31 Ensured that usermode +r is cleared from nicks which lose
9624 their identification status (e.g. from FORBID/SUSPEND).
9625 2005/03/31 NickServ SUSPEND now forces the user of the suspended
9626 nick to change nicknames, as FORBID does. Reported by
9627 Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
9628 2005/03/31 ChanServ now stops non-identified users from joining
9629 channels with mode +R locked on. Suggested by
9630 Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
9631
9632 --Andrew Church
9633 achurch@achurch.org
9634 http://achurch.org/
9635 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Sun Apr 10 03:32:42 2005
9636 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
9637 Date: Sat Apr 30 14:03:20 2005
9638 Subject: [IRCServices] NSRequireEmail Question
9639 Message-ID: <000b01c53db8$9a5efb80$4b4405d5@server>
9640
9641 Hello guys. I have a little question:-))
9642
9643 If i enable the NSRequireEmail option what will happen with the nicknames
9644 without an email address?
9645
9646 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Apr 29 12:29:54 2005
9647 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
9648 Date: Sat Apr 30 14:03:37 2005
9649 Subject: [IRCServices] PING before connect?
9650 Message-ID: <42728B32.2030508@frostycoolslug.com>
9651
9652 Whilst testing a new module we are currently developing, we decided (to
9653 save time), to connect IRCServices across the internet, rather than locally.
9654
9655 We ran into the problem of services sending a PING to the remote server
9656 BEFORE it was connected, resulting in an ENOTCONN, and Services bailing.
9657
9658 Surely the correct behaviour for this, is that services shouldn't
9659 attempt to ping, untill at least the SERVER command has been sent on
9660 initial connect? Would avoid this issue.
9661
9662 Log:
9663
9664 [Apr 29 22:01:54.046189 2005] debug: Loaded modules
9665 [Apr 29 22:01:54.049901 2005] Initiated connection to xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:7025
9666 [Apr 29 22:01:54.052287 2005] sockets: flush_write_buffer(4): Socket is
9667 not connected
9668 [Apr 29 22:01:54.053649 2005] debug: Sent: PING
9669 :services-dev.chatspike.net
9670 [Apr 29 22:01:57.059300 2005] debug: Saving databases
9671 [Apr 29 22:01:57.071440 2005] Read error from server: Socket is not
9672 connected
9673
9674 --
9675 On an un-related note.. is the coding mailing list down? the last mail i
9676 sent to it never arrived :/
9677
9678 --
9679 /****************************************
9680 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9681 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
9682 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
9683 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9684 ****************************************/
9685
9686 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Apr 29 13:03:54 2005
9687 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
9688 Date: Sat Apr 30 14:03:41 2005
9689 Subject: [IRCServices] test
9690 Message-ID: <4272932A.90205@frostycoolslug.com>
9691
9692 Read subject.. :p
9693 --
9694 /****************************************
9695 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
9696 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
9697 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
9698 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
9699 ****************************************/
9700
9701 From ianj at esper.net Sun May 1 12:33:41 2005
9702 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
9703 Date: Sun May 1 12:33:43 2005
9704 Subject: [IRCServices] test
9705 In-Reply-To: <4272932A.90205@frostycoolslug.com>
9706 References: <4272932A.90205@frostycoolslug.com>
9707 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505011230250.15397@sakura.ian-justman.com>
9708
9709 On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Craig McLure wrote:
9710
9711 > Read subject.. :p
9712
9713 If it's about the list's being down, a machine tanked where my server is
9714 located, one situated between the uplink connections and my core network.
9715
9716 The only reason it didn't get completed any sooner is because I'm
9717 vacationing in Sacramento and the machine is in Fresno, some 200 miles
9718 (some 320km or so) away.
9719
9720 The situation has been rectified and the network is working again.
9721
9722 My apologies for the outage.
9723
9724 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
9725
9726 -----
9727 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
9728 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
9729 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
9730
9731 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
9732 From brain at winbot.co.uk Tue May 3 04:21:41 2005
9733 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
9734 Date: Tue May 3 04:21:28 2005
9735 Subject: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban
9736 In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505011230250.15397@sakura.ian-justman.com>
9737 References: <4272932A.90205@frostycoolslug.com>
9738 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505011230250.15397@sakura.ian-justman.com>
9739 Message-ID: <42775EC5.2060301@winbot.co.uk>
9740
9741 Hi.
9742
9743 Ive found a problem with how ircservices matches bans for /cs unban.
9744 Whilst writing a protocol module i noticed that if a protocol module
9745 supplies ip addresses for connecting users, ALL channel bans will be
9746 checked against user->ip, not user->fakehost or user->host! This means
9747 that the ban just outright fails. This is a pretty old version (5.0.41)
9748 - has it since been fixed?
9749
9750 Thanks,
9751 Brain
9752 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Tue May 3 07:35:05 2005
9753 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
9754 Date: Tue May 3 07:35:29 2005
9755 Subject: [IRCServices] NSRequireEmail question
9756 Message-ID: <20050503143505.65216.qmail@web31402.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
9757
9758 Hello guys.
9759 I have a little question:-))
9760 If i enable the NSRequireEmail option what will happen
9761 with the nicknames without an email address added?
9762
9763
9764 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
9765 From QuietFinn at myrealbox.com Tue May 3 10:02:25 2005
9766 From: QuietFinn at myrealbox.com (QuietFinn)
9767 Date: Tue May 3 10:04:19 2005
9768 Subject: [IRCServices] NSRequireEmail question
9769 In-Reply-To: <20050503143505.65216.qmail@web31402.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
9770 Message-ID: <CMEIKFEMFPDDCJPEAMDCMEJHEIAA.QuietFinn@myrealbox.com>
9771
9772
9773 If I remember right when someone identifies to a nick without an email
9774 assigned to it (s)he will be asked to set an email address.
9775
9776 We did that (enabled the NSRequireEmail) and it went quite smoothly, and had
9777 instructions how to do it in services lognews.
9778
9779 quietFinn
9780 Services Admim, IRCFutureNet IRC network
9781 irc.ircfuture.net | http://www.ircfuture.net
9782 Server Admin - topaz.il.us.ircfuture.net
9783
9784 > -----Original Message-----
9785 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
9786 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of
9787 > Dionisios K.
9788 > Sent: 3. toukokuuta 2005 17:35
9789 > To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
9790 > Subject: [IRCServices] NSRequireEmail question
9791 >
9792 >
9793 > Hello guys.
9794 > I have a little question:-))
9795 > If i enable the NSRequireEmail option what will happen
9796 > with the nicknames without an email address added?
9797 >
9798 >
9799 > Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
9800 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9801 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9802 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9803 >
9804
9805
9806 From plasmaman at relica.org Tue May 3 10:37:35 2005
9807 From: plasmaman at relica.org (plasmaman@relica.org)
9808 Date: Tue May 3 10:38:09 2005
9809 Subject: [IRCServices] Fwd: Question ON Auspice
9810 Message-ID: <1115141855.4277b6dfb90b3@webmail.relica.org>
9811
9812
9813
9814
9815
9816 Hello, I was wondering if u can tell me how to convert anope db files to auspice
9817 db files, I know there's a way according to this site I found.
9818 Here is the site
9819 http://www.ircservices.esper.net/docs/5.html
9820
9821 But we can't seem to figure it out, eny comments/suggestion u have would be
9822 appreciated.
9823 We are trying to do this cause we are wanting to limit our oper's access to
9824 services, do to some abuse problems we've been having. We know it's possible to
9825 convert it just's hard for us to figure out what the hell they're saying on that
9826 website
9827
9828
9829 Thanks Again
9830
9831 Plasmaman(Justin)
9832
9833
9834 ----------------------------------------------------------------
9835 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
9836
9837 ----- End forwarded message -----
9838
9839
9840
9841
9842 ----------------------------------------------------------------
9843 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
9844
9845 From cpuman2000 at hotmail.com Tue May 3 16:03:53 2005
9846 From: cpuman2000 at hotmail.com (Chris Shuster)
9847 Date: Tue May 3 16:04:12 2005
9848 Subject: [IRCServices] SMTP Mail
9849 Message-ID: <BAY23-DAV966B7D2F65E0AC36C2C58C9180@phx.gbl>
9850
9851 A browse through the services documents didn't seem to get an answer to my question so here it is...
9852
9853 Does service's SMTP module support SMTP Auth? I'm guessing it doesn't since I have seen no mention of SMTP Auth.
9854
9855 If services doesn't support SMTP Auth then I'd like to request this feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of sendmail on a server as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for security reasons.
9856
9857 Thanks,
9858 Chris (aka CPUMAN)
9859 Serenia IRC Network
9860 irc.serenia.net
9861 -------------- next part --------------
9862 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
9863 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050503/a61678e8/attachment.html
9864 From elsukov at rdu.kirov.ru Tue May 3 23:47:09 2005
9865 From: elsukov at rdu.kirov.ru (Andrey V. Elsukov)
9866 Date: Tue May 3 23:47:53 2005
9867 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services on IA64
9868 Message-ID: <42786FED.2090809@rdu.kirov.ru>
9869
9870 Hello!
9871 Somebody tried to build services on IA64?
9872 Build fail on FreeBSD IA64 and Sparc..
9873 Build logs:
9874 http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/bu7cher@yandex.ru.html
9875 --
9876 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
9877
9878
9879 From achurch at achurch.org Wed May 4 16:42:01 2005
9880 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9881 Date: Wed May 4 00:42:54 2005
9882 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services on IA64
9883 In-Reply-To: <42786FED.2090809@rdu.kirov.ru>
9884 Message-ID: <42787cee.42600@msgid.achurch.org>
9885
9886 5.0.49 is out of date.
9887
9888 --Andrew Church
9889 achurch@achurch.org
9890 http://achurch.org/
9891
9892 >Hello!
9893 >Somebody tried to build services on IA64?
9894 >Build fail on FreeBSD IA64 and Sparc..
9895 >Build logs:
9896 >http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/bu7cher@yandex.ru.html
9897 >--
9898 >WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
9899 >
9900 >
9901 >------------------------------------------------------------------
9902 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9903 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9904 From elsukov at rdu.kirov.ru Wed May 4 00:47:54 2005
9905 From: elsukov at rdu.kirov.ru (Andrey V. Elsukov)
9906 Date: Wed May 4 00:48:36 2005
9907 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services on IA64
9908 In-Reply-To: <42787cee.42600@msgid.achurch.org>
9909 References: <42787cee.42600@msgid.achurch.org>
9910 Message-ID: <42787E2A.6010807@rdu.kirov.ru>
9911
9912 Andrew Church wrote:
9913 > 5.0.49 is out of date.
9914 I know. This logs is old, others no.
9915 --
9916 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
9917
9918 From paul.kain at gmail.com Wed May 4 00:51:56 2005
9919 From: paul.kain at gmail.com (Paul Kain)
9920 Date: Wed May 4 00:52:10 2005
9921 Subject: [IRCServices] Unforbidding a nick
9922 Message-ID: <451ba792050504005151b3d3fc@mail.gmail.com>
9923
9924 Hi all
9925
9926 I wonder if someone can please point out how to unforbid a nick ?
9927
9928 I ttried a variety of different commands with no joy.
9929
9930 What is the proper syntax ?
9931
9932 Thanks
9933 From dnb at majestic-liaisons.com Wed May 4 01:03:04 2005
9934 From: dnb at majestic-liaisons.com (DeadNotBuried)
9935 Date: Wed May 4 01:03:15 2005
9936 Subject: [IRCServices] Unforbidding a nick
9937 References: <451ba792050504005151b3d3fc@mail.gmail.com>
9938 Message-ID: <001201c5507f$b5faac20$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
9939
9940 try using DROPNICK
9941
9942 DNB
9943
9944 ----- Original Message -----
9945 From: "Paul Kain" <paul.kain@gmail.com>
9946 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
9947 Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:21 PM
9948 Subject: [IRCServices] Unforbidding a nick
9949
9950
9951 Hi all
9952
9953 I wonder if someone can please point out how to unforbid a nick ?
9954
9955 I ttried a variety of different commands with no joy.
9956
9957 What is the proper syntax ?
9958
9959 Thanks
9960 ------------------------------------------------------------------
9961 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9962 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9963
9964
9965 From plasmaman at relica.org Wed May 4 04:46:49 2005
9966 From: plasmaman at relica.org (plasmaman@relica.org)
9967 Date: Wed May 4 04:47:23 2005
9968 Subject: [IRCServices] Unforbidding a nick
9969 In-Reply-To: <451ba792050504005151b3d3fc@mail.gmail.com>
9970 References: <451ba792050504005151b3d3fc@mail.gmail.com>
9971 Message-ID: <1115207209.4278b629a345e@webmail.relica.org>
9972
9973 type /nickserv drop nickname
9974 Quoting Paul Kain <paul.kain@gmail.com>:
9975
9976 > Hi all
9977 >
9978 > I wonder if someone can please point out how to unforbid a nick ?
9979 >
9980 > I ttried a variety of different commands with no joy.
9981 >
9982 > What is the proper syntax ?
9983 >
9984 > Thanks
9985 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
9986 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
9987 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
9988 >
9989
9990
9991
9992
9993 ----------------------------------------------------------------
9994 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
9995
9996 From achurch at achurch.org Wed May 4 22:32:59 2005
9997 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
9998 Date: Wed May 4 06:44:57 2005
9999 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services on IA64
10000 In-Reply-To: <42787E2A.6010807@rdu.kirov.ru>
10001 Message-ID: <4278d1d0.42747@msgid.achurch.org>
10002
10003 >> 5.0.49 is out of date.
10004 >I know. This logs is old, others no.
10005
10006 I took a look at the one working link on the page you gave (which is
10007 also 5.0.49, but putting that aside for the moment); from what I can tell,
10008 you have a buggy compiler. If you give me access to the machine in
10009 question I can see if it's an easy workaround, but other than that all I
10010 can suggest is to use the latest version of GCC.
10011
10012
10013 --Andrew Church
10014 achurch@achurch.org
10015 http://achurch.org/
10016 From achurch at achurch.org Wed May 4 22:44:58 2005
10017 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10018 Date: Wed May 4 06:46:50 2005
10019 Subject: [IRCServices] NSRequireEmail question
10020 In-Reply-To: <CMEIKFEMFPDDCJPEAMDCMEJHEIAA.QuietFinn@myrealbox.com>
10021 Message-ID: <4278d243.42757@msgid.achurch.org>
10022
10023 >If I remember right when someone identifies to a nick without an email
10024 >assigned to it (s)he will be asked to set an email address.
10025
10026 Yes, that's correct; when such a user identifies, Services will tell
10027 them to set an E-mail address, and will not give them any privileges until
10028 they do so.
10029
10030 --Andrew Church
10031 achurch@achurch.org
10032 http://achurch.org/
10033 From achurch at achurch.org Wed May 4 22:46:49 2005
10034 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10035 Date: Wed May 4 06:49:24 2005
10036 Subject: [IRCServices] SMTP Mail
10037 In-Reply-To: <BAY23-DAV966B7D2F65E0AC36C2C58C9180@phx.gbl>
10038 Message-ID: <4278d2d3.42767@msgid.achurch.org>
10039
10040 Services doesn't currently support SMTP AUTH, since (my impression is
10041 that) most environments don't need it. If you do, I'll take a look into
10042 it, but it may have to wait until 5.1 (of which I will start getting alpha
10043 releases out Real Soon Now).
10044
10045 Also, please don't use HTML mail on the Services lists.
10046
10047 --Andrew Church
10048 achurch@achurch.org
10049 http://achurch.org/
10050
10051 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10052 >
10053 >--===============0881923972==
10054 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
10055 > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0"
10056 >
10057 >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10058 >
10059 >------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0
10060 >Content-Type: text/plain;
10061 > charset="iso-8859-1"
10062 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
10063 >
10064 >A browse through the services documents didn't seem to get an answer to =
10065 >my question so here it is...
10066 >
10067 >Does service's SMTP module support SMTP Auth? I'm guessing it doesn't =
10068 >since I have seen no mention of SMTP Auth.
10069 >
10070 >If services doesn't support SMTP Auth then I'd like to request this =
10071 >feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of sendmail on a server =
10072 >as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for =
10073 >security reasons.
10074 >
10075 >Thanks,
10076 >Chris (aka CPUMAN)
10077 >Serenia IRC Network
10078 >irc.serenia.net
10079 >------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0
10080 >Content-Type: text/html;
10081 > charset="iso-8859-1"
10082 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
10083 >
10084 ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
10085 ><HTML><HEAD>
10086 ><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
10087 >charset=3Diso-8859-1">
10088 ><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1498" name=3DGENERATOR>
10089 ><STYLE></STYLE>
10090 ></HEAD>
10091 ><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
10092 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A browse through the services documents =
10093 >didn't seem=20
10094 >to get an answer to my question so here it is...</FONT></DIV>
10095 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10096 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Does service's SMTP module support SMTP =
10097 >Auth?&nbsp;=20
10098 >I'm guessing it doesn't since I have seen no mention of SMTP =
10099 >Auth.</FONT></DIV>
10100 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10101 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If services doesn't support SMTP Auth =
10102 >then I'd like=20
10103 >to request this feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of =
10104 >sendmail on a=20
10105 >server as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for =
10106 >
10107 >security reasons.</FONT></DIV>
10108 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10109 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
10110 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Chris </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
10111 >size=3D2>(aka=20
10112 >CPUMAN)</FONT></DIV>
10113 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Serenia IRC Network</FONT></DIV>
10114 ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
10115 >size=3D2>irc.serenia.net</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
10116 >
10117 >------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0--
10118 >
10119 >--===============0881923972==
10120 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
10121 >MIME-Version: 1.0
10122 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
10123 >Content-Disposition: inline
10124 >
10125 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10126 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10127 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10128 >--===============0881923972==--
10129 From tom at vscan.org Wed May 4 07:10:11 2005
10130 From: tom at vscan.org (Thomas Griffiths)
10131 Date: Wed May 4 07:09:14 2005
10132 Subject: [IRCServices] SMTP Mail
10133 In-Reply-To: <4278d2d3.42767@msgid.achurch.org>
10134 References: <4278d2d3.42767@msgid.achurch.org>
10135 Message-ID: <4278D7C3.9070408@vscan.org>
10136
10137 Just a one liner to register an additional interest in services
10138 supporting SMTP AUTH.
10139
10140 Thomas Griffiths
10141 tom@vscan.org
10142
10143 Andrew Church wrote:
10144
10145 > Services doesn't currently support SMTP AUTH, since (my impression is
10146 >that) most environments don't need it. If you do, I'll take a look into
10147 >it, but it may have to wait until 5.1 (of which I will start getting alpha
10148 >releases out Real Soon Now).
10149 >
10150 > Also, please don't use HTML mail on the Services lists.
10151 >
10152 > --Andrew Church
10153 > achurch@achurch.org
10154 > http://achurch.org/
10155 >
10156 >
10157 >
10158 >>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10159 >>
10160 >>--===============0881923972==
10161 >>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
10162 >> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0"
10163 >>
10164 >>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10165 >>
10166 >>------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0
10167 >>Content-Type: text/plain;
10168 >> charset="iso-8859-1"
10169 >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
10170 >>
10171 >>A browse through the services documents didn't seem to get an answer to =
10172 >>my question so here it is...
10173 >>
10174 >>Does service's SMTP module support SMTP Auth? I'm guessing it doesn't =
10175 >>since I have seen no mention of SMTP Auth.
10176 >>
10177 >>If services doesn't support SMTP Auth then I'd like to request this =
10178 >>feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of sendmail on a server =
10179 >>as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for =
10180 >>security reasons.
10181 >>
10182 >>Thanks,
10183 >>Chris (aka CPUMAN)
10184 >>Serenia IRC Network
10185 >>irc.serenia.net
10186 >>------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0
10187 >>Content-Type: text/html;
10188 >> charset="iso-8859-1"
10189 >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
10190 >>
10191 >><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
10192 >><HTML><HEAD>
10193 >><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
10194 >>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
10195 >><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1498" name=3DGENERATOR>
10196 >><STYLE></STYLE>
10197 >></HEAD>
10198 >><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
10199 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A browse through the services documents =
10200 >>didn't seem=20
10201 >>to get an answer to my question so here it is...</FONT></DIV>
10202 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10203 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Does service's SMTP module support SMTP =
10204 >>Auth?&nbsp;=20
10205 >>I'm guessing it doesn't since I have seen no mention of SMTP =
10206 >>Auth.</FONT></DIV>
10207 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10208 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If services doesn't support SMTP Auth =
10209 >>then I'd like=20
10210 >>to request this feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of =
10211 >>sendmail on a=20
10212 >>server as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for =
10213 >>
10214 >>security reasons.</FONT></DIV>
10215 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10216 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
10217 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Chris </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
10218 >>size=3D2>(aka=20
10219 >>CPUMAN)</FONT></DIV>
10220 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Serenia IRC Network</FONT></DIV>
10221 >><DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
10222 >>size=3D2>irc.serenia.net</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
10223 >>
10224 >>------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0--
10225 >>
10226 >>--===============0881923972==
10227 >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
10228 >>MIME-Version: 1.0
10229 >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
10230 >>Content-Disposition: inline
10231 >>
10232 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
10233 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10234 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10235 >>--===============0881923972==--
10236 >>
10237 >>
10238 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10239 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10240 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10241 >
10242 >
10243 >
10244 >
10245 >
10246
10247 From dnb at majestic-liaisons.com Wed May 4 07:23:23 2005
10248 From: dnb at majestic-liaisons.com (DeadNotBuried)
10249 Date: Wed May 4 07:23:52 2005
10250 Subject: [IRCServices] SMTP Mail
10251 References: <4278d2d3.42767@msgid.achurch.org> <4278D7C3.9070408@vscan.org>
10252 Message-ID: <000b01c550b4$d9db7220$0100a8c0@dnblaptop>
10253
10254
10255 I'd like it as well, with my email server on a separate box, and needing
10256 SMTP AUTH it's basically the only reason I don't require real email
10257 addresses when registering nicks.
10258
10259 DNB
10260
10261 ----- Original Message -----
10262 From: "Thomas Griffiths" <tom@vscan.org>
10263 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
10264 Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:40 PM
10265 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] SMTP Mail
10266
10267
10268 > Just a one liner to register an additional interest in services
10269 > supporting SMTP AUTH.
10270 >
10271 > Thomas Griffiths
10272 > tom@vscan.org
10273 >
10274 > Andrew Church wrote:
10275 >
10276 > > Services doesn't currently support SMTP AUTH, since (my impression
10277 is
10278 > >that) most environments don't need it. If you do, I'll take a look into
10279 > >it, but it may have to wait until 5.1 (of which I will start getting
10280 alpha
10281 > >releases out Real Soon Now).
10282 > >
10283 > > Also, please don't use HTML mail on the Services lists.
10284 > >
10285 > > --Andrew Church
10286 > > achurch@achurch.org
10287 > > http://achurch.org/
10288 > >
10289 > >
10290 > >
10291 > >>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10292 > >>
10293 > >>--===============0881923972==
10294 > >>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
10295 > >> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0"
10296 > >>
10297 > >>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10298 > >>
10299 > >>------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0
10300 > >>Content-Type: text/plain;
10301 > >> charset="iso-8859-1"
10302 > >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
10303 > >>
10304 > >>A browse through the services documents didn't seem to get an answer to
10305 =
10306 > >>my question so here it is...
10307 > >>
10308 > >>Does service's SMTP module support SMTP Auth? I'm guessing it doesn't =
10309 > >>since I have seen no mention of SMTP Auth.
10310 > >>
10311 > >>If services doesn't support SMTP Auth then I'd like to request this =
10312 > >>feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of sendmail on a server =
10313 > >>as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for =
10314 > >>security reasons.
10315 > >>
10316 > >>Thanks,
10317 > >>Chris (aka CPUMAN)
10318 > >>Serenia IRC Network
10319 > >>irc.serenia.net
10320
10321 From ballsy at mystical.net Wed May 4 10:11:10 2005
10322 From: ballsy at mystical.net (David)
10323 Date: Wed May 4 10:21:00 2005
10324 Subject: [IRCServices] Unforbidding a nick
10325 In-Reply-To: <451ba792050504005151b3d3fc@mail.gmail.com>
10326 References: <451ba792050504005151b3d3fc@mail.gmail.com>
10327 Message-ID: <200505041111100466.AEC2781A@smtp.messaging.ca.mci.com>
10328
10329 Hi Paul. As per /msg nickserv help forbid :
10330
10331 -NickServ- Syntax: FORBID nickname
10332 -NickServ-
10333 -NickServ- Disallows a nickname from being registered or used by
10334 -NickServ- anyone. May be cancelled by dropping the nickname.
10335 -NickServ-
10336 -NickServ- Limited to Services admins.
10337
10338 Hope that helps.
10339
10340 Ballsy
10341
10342
10343 On 04/05/2005 at 9:51 AM Paul Kain wrote:
10344
10345 >Hi all
10346 >
10347 >I wonder if someone can please point out how to unforbid a nick ?
10348 >
10349 >I ttried a variety of different commands with no joy.
10350 >
10351 >What is the proper syntax ?
10352 >
10353 >Thanks
10354 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10355 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10356 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10357
10358
10359
10360 From achurch at achurch.org Thu May 5 09:57:41 2005
10361 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10362 Date: Wed May 4 17:59:08 2005
10363 Subject: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban
10364 In-Reply-To: <42775EC5.2060301@winbot.co.uk>
10365 Message-ID: <42796fd4.43116@msgid.achurch.org>
10366
10367 >Ive found a problem with how ircservices matches bans for /cs unban.
10368 >Whilst writing a protocol module i noticed that if a protocol module
10369 >supplies ip addresses for connecting users, ALL channel bans will be
10370 >checked against user->ip, not user->fakehost or user->host! This means
10371 >that the ban just outright fails. This is a pretty old version (5.0.41)
10372 >- has it since been fixed?
10373
10374 I can't see that such a bug was ever there; the code first checks
10375 against the host and fakehost regardless of protocol, then checks the IP
10376 address if the protocol supplies it.
10377
10378 --Andrew Church
10379 achurch@achurch.org
10380 http://achurch.org/
10381 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed May 4 18:21:09 2005
10382 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
10383 Date: Wed May 4 18:20:54 2005
10384 Subject: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban
10385 In-Reply-To: <42796fd4.43116@msgid.achurch.org>
10386 References: <42796fd4.43116@msgid.achurch.org>
10387 Message-ID: <42797505.5070206@winbot.co.uk>
10388
10389 the bug was in my own code, i havent had chance to reply
10390
10391 thanks for your time and sorry for wasting it :p
10392
10393 Brain
10394
10395 Andrew Church wrote:
10396 >>Ive found a problem with how ircservices matches bans for /cs unban.
10397 >>Whilst writing a protocol module i noticed that if a protocol module
10398 >>supplies ip addresses for connecting users, ALL channel bans will be
10399 >>checked against user->ip, not user->fakehost or user->host! This means
10400 >>that the ban just outright fails. This is a pretty old version (5.0.41)
10401 >>- has it since been fixed?
10402 >
10403 >
10404 > I can't see that such a bug was ever there; the code first checks
10405 > against the host and fakehost regardless of protocol, then checks the IP
10406 > address if the protocol supplies it.
10407 >
10408 > --Andrew Church
10409 > achurch@achurch.org
10410 > http://achurch.org/
10411 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10412 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10413 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10414 >
10415 >
10416
10417 --
10418 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
10419 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
10420 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
10421 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
10422 --
10423 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed May 4 18:26:23 2005
10424 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
10425 Date: Wed May 4 18:26:06 2005
10426 Subject: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban
10427 Message-ID: <4279763F.3050505@winbot.co.uk>
10428
10429
10430 the bug was in my own code, i havent had chance to reply
10431
10432 thanks for your time and sorry for wasting it :p
10433
10434 Brain
10435
10436 Andrew Church wrote:
10437 >>Ive found a problem with how ircservices matches bans for /cs unban.
10438 >>Whilst writing a protocol module i noticed that if a protocol module
10439 >>supplies ip addresses for connecting users, ALL channel bans will be
10440 >>checked against user->ip, not user->fakehost or user->host! This means
10441 >>that the ban just outright fails. This is a pretty old version (5.0.41)
10442 >>- has it since been fixed?
10443 >
10444 >
10445 > I can't see that such a bug was ever there; the code first checks
10446 > against the host and fakehost regardless of protocol, then checks the IP
10447 > address if the protocol supplies it.
10448 >
10449 > --Andrew Church
10450 > achurch@achurch.org
10451 > http://achurch.org/
10452 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10453 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10454 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10455 >
10456 >
10457
10458 --
10459 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
10460 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
10461 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
10462 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
10463 --
10464 From brain at winbot.co.uk Wed May 4 18:39:46 2005
10465 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
10466 Date: Wed May 4 18:39:30 2005
10467 Subject: [Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban]
10468 Message-ID: <42797962.5050408@winbot.co.uk>
10469
10470 Hi.
10471
10472 I keep getting these strange bounces (With attachments) whenever i send
10473 to the ircservices list, even when the messages go through!
10474
10475 What server is scousens@SCOUSEND? dont know if its related to the lists
10476 or not, or if im seeing bounces for someone elses messages?
10477
10478 Thanks
10479 Brain
10480
10481 -------- Original Message --------
10482 Subject: Undeliverable: Re: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban
10483 Date: 4 May 2005 22:29:00 -0300
10484 From: System Administrator <administrator@SCOUSENSAD>
10485 To: <brain@winbot.co.uk>
10486
10487 Your message
10488
10489 To: "ircservices@ircservices.esper.net"
10490 <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
10491 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban
10492 Sent: Wed May 04 10:29:00 2005
10493
10494
10495 did not reach the following recipient(s):
10496 scousens@SCOUSENSAD on Wed May 04 10:29:00 2005
10497
10498 The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message
10499 was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient
10500 directly to find out the correct address.
10501 <server-cousens.SCOUSENSAD #5.1.1>
10502
10503
10504 --
10505 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
10506 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
10507 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
10508 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
10509 --
10510 From lists at silverdream.org Wed May 4 18:52:31 2005
10511 From: lists at silverdream.org (Jamie L. Penman-Smithson)
10512 Date: Wed May 4 18:52:46 2005
10513 Subject: [Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban]
10514 In-Reply-To: <42797962.5050408@winbot.co.uk>
10515 References: <42797962.5050408@winbot.co.uk>
10516 Message-ID: <1115257951.16128.208.camel@hercules.silverdream.hq>
10517
10518 On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 02:39 +0100, Craig Edwards wrote:
10519 > I keep getting these strange bounces (With attachments) whenever i send
10520 > to the ircservices list, even when the messages go through!
10521 >
10522 > What server is scousens@SCOUSEND? dont know if its related to the lists
10523 > or not, or if im seeing bounces for someone elses messages?
10524
10525 It could be a broken mail server which is sending bounces to the From
10526 address instead of the Return-Path, contrary to what the RFCs state.
10527
10528 It's not related to the lists, they originate from ian-justman.com,
10529 nothing to do with 'scouseend'...
10530
10531 -j
10532 -------------- next part --------------
10533 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
10534 Name: not available
10535 Type: application/pgp-signature
10536 Size: 189 bytes
10537 Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
10538 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050505/ce702b8b/attachment-0001.pgp
10539 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Wed May 4 19:03:51 2005
10540 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
10541 Date: Wed May 4 19:04:07 2005
10542 Subject: [Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban]
10543 In-Reply-To: <42797962.5050408@winbot.co.uk>
10544 Message-ID: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJEECJCAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
10545
10546 I had odd issues with these lists some time back, however mine
10547 appeared to be primarily a client-side issue. Dunno about that
10548 one though, especially scousense.. etc.
10549
10550 w00t.
10551
10552 -----Original Message-----
10553 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
10554 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of Craig
10555 Edwards
10556 Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2005 11:40 AM
10557 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
10558 Subject: [Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban]
10559
10560
10561 Hi.
10562
10563 I keep getting these strange bounces (With attachments) whenever i send
10564 to the ircservices list, even when the messages go through!
10565
10566 What server is scousens@SCOUSEND? dont know if its related to the lists
10567 or not, or if im seeing bounces for someone elses messages?
10568
10569 Thanks
10570 Brain
10571 From elsukov at rdu.kirov.ru Wed May 4 21:15:14 2005
10572 From: elsukov at rdu.kirov.ru (Andrey V. Elsukov)
10573 Date: Wed May 4 21:15:59 2005
10574 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services on IA64
10575 In-Reply-To: <4278d1d0.42747@msgid.achurch.org>
10576 References: <4278d1d0.42747@msgid.achurch.org>
10577 Message-ID: <42799DD2.9060106@rdu.kirov.ru>
10578
10579 Andrew Church wrote:
10580 > I took a look at the one working link on the page you gave (which is
10581 > also 5.0.49, but putting that aside for the moment); from what I can tell,
10582 > you have a buggy compiler. If you give me access to the machine in
10583 > question I can see if it's an easy workaround, but other than that all I
10584 > can suggest is to use the latest version of GCC.
10585
10586 I don't have access to this machine, this is package build cluster of
10587 FreeBSD Project. I am only port maintainer.. And i can't found IA64 for
10588 testing. :(
10589
10590 Maybe -fPIC gcc option can solve this problem?
10591 http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-ia64_2004/msg00100.html
10592
10593 Currently i make patch to freebsd port and send to committers. If it
10594 will help, i shall make a configure script patch.
10595 --
10596 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
10597
10598 From achurch at achurch.org Fri May 6 02:46:48 2005
10599 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10600 Date: Thu May 5 10:47:45 2005
10601 Subject: [Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: [IRCServices] problem with /cs unban]
10602 In-Reply-To: <42797962.5050408@winbot.co.uk>
10603 Message-ID: <427a5c39.43306@msgid.achurch.org>
10604
10605 >I keep getting these strange bounces (With attachments) whenever i send
10606 >to the ircservices list, even when the messages go through!
10607 >
10608 >What server is scousens@SCOUSEND? dont know if its related to the lists
10609 >or not, or if im seeing bounces for someone elses messages?
10610
10611 Looks like a dead address on a badly-configured mail server. I've
10612 removed the address from the list.
10613
10614 --Andrew Church
10615 achurch@achurch.org
10616 http://achurch.org/
10617 From achurch at achurch.org Fri May 6 02:48:11 2005
10618 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10619 Date: Thu May 5 10:49:49 2005
10620 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services on IA64
10621 In-Reply-To: <42799DD2.9060106@rdu.kirov.ru>
10622 Message-ID: <427a5cb6.43316@msgid.achurch.org>
10623
10624 >Maybe -fPIC gcc option can solve this problem?
10625 >http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-ia64_2004/msg00100.html
10626
10627 That may work as well, but I recommend using static modules
10628 (configure -use-static-modules) as it doesn't involve patching source or
10629 Makefiles.
10630
10631 --Andrew Church
10632 achurch@achurch.org
10633 http://achurch.org/
10634 From cpuman2000 at hotmail.com Thu May 5 13:18:45 2005
10635 From: cpuman2000 at hotmail.com (Chris Shuster)
10636 Date: Thu May 5 13:18:58 2005
10637 Subject: [IRCServices] SMTP Mail
10638 References: <4278d2d3.42767@msgid.achurch.org>
10639 Message-ID: <BAY23-DAV5A7055248F567FC9B4612C91A0@phx.gbl>
10640
10641 Blasted e-mail client... thought I had HTML turned off.
10642
10643 But yes this feature would be really helpful even if it has to wait until
10644 services 5.1
10645
10646 Thanks,
10647 Chris (aka CPUMAN)
10648 Serenia IRC Network
10649 irc.serenia.net
10650
10651 ----- Original Message -----
10652 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
10653 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
10654 Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 7:46 AM
10655 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] SMTP Mail
10656
10657
10658 > Services doesn't currently support SMTP AUTH, since (my impression is
10659 > that) most environments don't need it. If you do, I'll take a look into
10660 > it, but it may have to wait until 5.1 (of which I will start getting alpha
10661 > releases out Real Soon Now).
10662 >
10663 > Also, please don't use HTML mail on the Services lists.
10664 >
10665 > --Andrew Church
10666 > achurch@achurch.org
10667 > http://achurch.org/
10668 >
10669 > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10670 > >
10671 > >--===============0881923972==
10672 > >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
10673 > > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0"
10674 > >
10675 > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10676 > >
10677 > >------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0
10678 > >Content-Type: text/plain;
10679 > > charset="iso-8859-1"
10680 > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
10681 > >
10682 > >A browse through the services documents didn't seem to get an answer to =
10683 > >my question so here it is...
10684 > >
10685 > >Does service's SMTP module support SMTP Auth? I'm guessing it doesn't =
10686 > >since I have seen no mention of SMTP Auth.
10687 > >
10688 > >If services doesn't support SMTP Auth then I'd like to request this =
10689 > >feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of sendmail on a server =
10690 > >as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for =
10691 > >security reasons.
10692 > >
10693 > >Thanks,
10694 > >Chris (aka CPUMAN)
10695 > >Serenia IRC Network
10696 > >irc.serenia.net
10697 > >------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0
10698 > >Content-Type: text/html;
10699 > > charset="iso-8859-1"
10700 > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
10701 > >
10702 > ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
10703 > ><HTML><HEAD>
10704 > ><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
10705 > >charset=3Diso-8859-1">
10706 > ><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1498" name=3DGENERATOR>
10707 > ><STYLE></STYLE>
10708 > ></HEAD>
10709 > ><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
10710 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A browse through the services documents
10711 =
10712 > >didn't seem=20
10713 > >to get an answer to my question so here it is...</FONT></DIV>
10714 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10715 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Does service's SMTP module support SMTP
10716 =
10717 > >Auth?&nbsp;=20
10718 > >I'm guessing it doesn't since I have seen no mention of SMTP =
10719 > >Auth.</FONT></DIV>
10720 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10721 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If services doesn't support SMTP Auth =
10722 > >then I'd like=20
10723 > >to request this feature. Why you ask? Well it'd let me get rid of =
10724 > >sendmail on a=20
10725 > >server as I have a dedicated e-mail server but it requires SMTP Auth for
10726 =
10727 > >
10728 > >security reasons.</FONT></DIV>
10729 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
10730 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
10731 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Chris </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
10732 > >size=3D2>(aka=20
10733 > >CPUMAN)</FONT></DIV>
10734 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Serenia IRC Network</FONT></DIV>
10735 > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
10736 > >size=3D2>irc.serenia.net</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
10737 > >
10738 > >------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55002.15DDC7E0--
10739 > >
10740 > >--===============0881923972==
10741 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
10742 > >MIME-Version: 1.0
10743 > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
10744 > >Content-Disposition: inline
10745 > >
10746 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
10747 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10748 > >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10749 > >--===============0881923972==--
10750 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10751 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10752 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10753 >
10754 From smkelly at zombie.org Thu May 5 14:51:41 2005
10755 From: smkelly at zombie.org (Sean Kelly)
10756 Date: Thu May 5 14:51:47 2005
10757 Subject: [IRCServices] IRC Services on IA64
10758 In-Reply-To: <427a5cb6.43316@msgid.achurch.org>
10759 References: <42799DD2.9060106@rdu.kirov.ru> <427a5cb6.43316@msgid.achurch.org>
10760 Message-ID: <20050505215141.GA52599@edgemaster.zombie.org>
10761
10762 On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:48:11AM +0900, Andrew Church wrote:
10763 > >Maybe -fPIC gcc option can solve this problem?
10764 > >http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-ia64_2004/msg00100.html
10765 >
10766 > That may work as well, but I recommend using static modules
10767 > (configure -use-static-modules) as it doesn't involve patching source or
10768 > Makefiles.
10769
10770 ./configure -cflags -fPIC built cleanly on pluto1.freebsd.org (900.00-Mhz
10771 Itanium 2, FreeBSD 5.4-RC3, gcc 3.4.2). The executable works, however I have
10772 not gone through the process of setting up a set of config files with modules
10773 to see if it loads and uses them properly. I don't currently have the time or
10774 resources for it. I will see about poking at the problem more later.
10775 Possibly this weekend.
10776
10777 --
10778 Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
10779 smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org
10780 -------------- next part --------------
10781 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
10782 Name: not available
10783 Type: application/pgp-signature
10784 Size: 187 bytes
10785 Desc: not available
10786 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050505/cfbf0e3e/attachment.pgp
10787 From achurch at achurch.org Fri May 6 11:11:32 2005
10788 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
10789 Date: Thu May 5 19:11:52 2005
10790 Subject: [IRCServices] PING before connect?
10791 In-Reply-To: <42728B32.2030508@frostycoolslug.com>
10792 Message-ID: <427ad262.45651@msgid.achurch.org>
10793
10794 Fixed, thanks for the report.
10795
10796 --Andrew Church
10797 achurch@achurch.org
10798 http://achurch.org/
10799
10800 >Whilst testing a new module we are currently developing, we decided (to
10801 >save time), to connect IRCServices across the internet, rather than locally.
10802 >
10803 >We ran into the problem of services sending a PING to the remote server
10804 >BEFORE it was connected, resulting in an ENOTCONN, and Services bailing.
10805 >
10806 >Surely the correct behaviour for this, is that services shouldn't
10807 >attempt to ping, untill at least the SERVER command has been sent on
10808 >initial connect? Would avoid this issue.
10809 >
10810 >Log:
10811 >
10812 >[Apr 29 22:01:54.046189 2005] debug: Loaded modules
10813 >[Apr 29 22:01:54.049901 2005] Initiated connection to xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:7025
10814 >[Apr 29 22:01:54.052287 2005] sockets: flush_write_buffer(4): Socket is
10815 >not connected
10816 >[Apr 29 22:01:54.053649 2005] debug: Sent: PING
10817 >:services-dev.chatspike.net
10818 >[Apr 29 22:01:57.059300 2005] debug: Saving databases
10819 >[Apr 29 22:01:57.071440 2005] Read error from server: Socket is not
10820 >connected
10821 >
10822 >--
10823 >On an un-related note.. is the coding mailing list down? the last mail i
10824 >sent to it never arrived :/
10825 >
10826 >--
10827 >/****************************************
10828 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
10829 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
10830 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
10831 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
10832 > ****************************************/
10833 >
10834 >------------------------------------------------------------------
10835 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10836 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10837 From seth at gonca.net Sun May 8 04:46:11 2005
10838 From: seth at gonca.net (Seth)
10839 Date: Sun May 8 05:46:23 2005
10840 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.51 defs.h TR lang problem
10841 Message-ID: <005301c553c3$8ef1b320$0100000a@seth>
10842
10843 #define DEF_LANGUAGE LANG_EN_US
10844
10845 I change the DEF_LANGUAGE to LANG_TR, then gmake, gmake install but it is
10846 still in English. I did it LANG_DE and it is still in English.
10847
10848 What am i doing wrong?
10849
10850
10851
10852
10853
10854 Evren
10855
10856
10857
10858 From seth at gonca.net Sun May 8 11:45:58 2005
10859 From: seth at gonca.net (Seth)
10860 Date: Sun May 8 11:45:56 2005
10861 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.51 defs.h TR lang problem
10862 References: <005301c553c3$8ef1b320$0100000a@seth>
10863 Message-ID: <002201c553fe$2d6db410$0100000a@seth>
10864
10865 i did it.
10866 first gmake clean, then gmake, gmake install :)
10867
10868
10869 Evren
10870
10871
10872 ----- Original Message -----
10873 From: "Seth" <seth@gonca.net>
10874 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
10875 Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 2:46 PM
10876 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.51 defs.h TR lang problem
10877
10878
10879 > #define DEF_LANGUAGE LANG_EN_US
10880 >
10881 > I change the DEF_LANGUAGE to LANG_TR, then gmake, gmake install but it is
10882 > still in English. I did it LANG_DE and it is still in English.
10883 >
10884 > What am i doing wrong?
10885 >
10886 >
10887 >
10888 >
10889 >
10890 > Evren
10891 >
10892 >
10893 >
10894 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10895 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10896 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10897
10898 From xxx.coder at gmail.com Sun May 8 12:31:26 2005
10899 From: xxx.coder at gmail.com (ongeboren)
10900 Date: Sun May 8 12:31:34 2005
10901 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.51 defs.h TR lang problem
10902 In-Reply-To: <002201c553fe$2d6db410$0100000a@seth>
10903 References: <005301c553c3$8ef1b320$0100000a@seth>
10904 <002201c553fe$2d6db410$0100000a@seth>
10905 Message-ID: <ce6d536005050812312c03947a@mail.gmail.com>
10906
10907 difficult to read the fine manual, isn't it?
10908
10909 On 5/8/05, Seth <seth@gonca.net> wrote:
10910 > i did it.
10911 > first gmake clean, then gmake, gmake install :)
10912 >
10913 > Evren
10914 >
10915 >
10916 > ----- Original Message -----
10917 > From: "Seth" <seth@gonca.net>
10918 > To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
10919 > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 2:46 PM
10920 > Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.51 defs.h TR lang problem
10921 >
10922 > > #define DEF_LANGUAGE LANG_EN_US
10923 > >
10924 > > I change the DEF_LANGUAGE to LANG_TR, then gmake, gmake install but it is
10925 > > still in English. I did it LANG_DE and it is still in English.
10926 > >
10927 > > What am i doing wrong?
10928 > >
10929 > >
10930 > >
10931 > >
10932 > >
10933 > > Evren
10934 > >
10935 > >
10936 > >
10937 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10938 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10939 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10940 >
10941 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
10942 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
10943 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
10944 >
10945
10946
10947 --
10948 Evlogi Petrov - ongeboren@UniBG
10949 From romka at romka.org.ua Sun May 8 10:17:08 2005
10950 From: romka at romka.org.ua (Roman Sheremet)
10951 Date: Sun May 8 12:58:12 2005
10952 Subject: [IRCServices] ImmediatelySendAutokill problem!
10953 Message-ID: <20050508195809.2D9AFE8DCF4@sakura.ian-justman.com>
10954
10955 Hello Dear ALL.
10956
10957 I have one question(maybe patch) to function "ImmediatelySendAutokill", i
10958 already read and understood IrcServices FAQ about this problem:
10959
10960 /*
10961 F.10. Services doesn't kill users matching a newly-added autokill mask even
10962 if ImmediatelySendAutokill is set.
10963 Services never kills users when a new autokill is added; the
10964 ImmediatelySendAutokill configuration directive only causes Services to send
10965 the autokill itself (that is, the user/host mask to prohibit new connections
10966 from) to the IRC servers on your network. This is a safety feature intended
10967 to limit the damage caused by a mistyped autokill.
10968
10969 Note that some IRC servers will themselves kill users matching a newly-added
10970 autokill; this is unrelated to Services.
10971 */
10972
10973 but, i need this function: It is necessary to me, what after addition of a
10974 new host in AKILL list, Services instantly dispatched all servers this
10975 AKILL.
10976
10977 How I am able to do it? If patches? It is necessary to something to correct?
10978
10979
10980 P.S: Sorry for my 'bad english'm i`m from Ukraine.
10981
10982 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sun May 8 13:11:59 2005
10983 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
10984 Date: Sun May 8 13:12:04 2005
10985 Subject: [IRCServices] ImmediatelySendAutokill problem!
10986 In-Reply-To: <20050508195809.2D9AFE8DCF4@sakura.ian-justman.com>
10987 References: <20050508195809.2D9AFE8DCF4@sakura.ian-justman.com>
10988 Message-ID: <427E728F.2030904@frostycoolslug.com>
10989
10990 What IRCd are you running?
10991
10992 /****************************************
10993 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
10994 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
10995 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
10996 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
10997 ****************************************/
10998
10999 Roman Sheremet wrote:
11000 > Hello Dear ALL.
11001 >
11002 > I have one question(maybe patch) to function "ImmediatelySendAutokill", i
11003 > already read and understood IrcServices FAQ about this problem:
11004 >
11005 > /*
11006 > F.10. Services doesn't kill users matching a newly-added autokill mask even
11007 > if ImmediatelySendAutokill is set.
11008 > Services never kills users when a new autokill is added; the
11009 > ImmediatelySendAutokill configuration directive only causes Services to send
11010 > the autokill itself (that is, the user/host mask to prohibit new connections
11011 > from) to the IRC servers on your network. This is a safety feature intended
11012 > to limit the damage caused by a mistyped autokill.
11013 >
11014 > Note that some IRC servers will themselves kill users matching a newly-added
11015 > autokill; this is unrelated to Services.
11016 > */
11017 >
11018 > but, i need this function: It is necessary to me, what after addition of a
11019 > new host in AKILL list, Services instantly dispatched all servers this
11020 > AKILL.
11021 >
11022 > How I am able to do it? If patches? It is necessary to something to correct?
11023 >
11024 >
11025 > P.S: Sorry for my 'bad english'm i`m from Ukraine.
11026 >
11027 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11028 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11029 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11030 >
11031 >
11032
11033 From romka at romka.org.ua Sun May 8 10:36:26 2005
11034 From: romka at romka.org.ua (Roman Sheremet)
11035 Date: Sun May 8 13:17:25 2005
11036 Subject: [IRCServices] ImmediatelySendAutokill problem!
11037 Message-ID: <20050508201723.D85A4E8DCE6@sakura.ian-justman.com>
11038
11039 irc2.10.3p2ua1
11040
11041 --------- Original Message --------
11042 From: IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
11043 To: IRC Services General Mailing List <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
11044 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] ImmediatelySendAutokill problem!
11045 Date: 08/05/05 21:31
11046
11047 >
11048 > What IRCd are you running?
11049 >
11050 > /****************************************
11051 > * Craig &quot;FrostyCoolSlug&quot; McLure
11052 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
11053 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
11054 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
11055 > ****************************************/
11056 >
11057 > Roman Sheremet wrote:
11058 > &gt; Hello Dear ALL.
11059 > &gt;
11060 > &gt; I have one question(maybe patch) to function
11061 &quot;ImmediatelySendAutokill&quot;, i
11062 > &gt; already read and understood IrcServices FAQ about this problem:
11063 > &gt;
11064 > &gt; /*
11065 > &gt; F.10. Services doesn't kill users matching a newly-added autokill
11066 mask even
11067 > &gt; if ImmediatelySendAutokill is set.
11068 > &gt; Services never kills users when a new autokill is added; the
11069 > &gt; ImmediatelySendAutokill configuration directive only causes Services
11070 to send
11071 > &gt; the autokill itself (that is, the user/host mask to prohibit new
11072 connections
11073 > &gt; from) to the IRC servers on your network. This is a safety feature
11074 intended
11075 > &gt; to limit the damage caused by a mistyped autokill.
11076 > &gt;
11077 > &gt; Note that some IRC servers will themselves kill users matching a
11078 newly-added
11079 > &gt; autokill; this is unrelated to Services.
11080 > &gt; */
11081 > &gt;
11082 > &gt; but, i need this function: It is necessary to me, what after addition
11083 of a
11084 > &gt; new host in AKILL list, Services instantly dispatched all servers
11085 this
11086 > &gt; AKILL.
11087 > &gt;
11088 > &gt; How I am able to do it? If patches? It is necessary to something to
11089 correct?
11090 > &gt;
11091 > &gt;
11092 > &gt; P.S: Sorry for my 'bad english'm i`m from Ukraine.
11093 > &gt;
11094 > &gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------
11095 > &gt; To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11096 > &gt; http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11097 > &gt;
11098 > &gt;
11099 >
11100 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11101 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11102 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11103 >
11104 >
11105 >
11106 >
11107 >
11108
11109 From alm at woodnet.ru Wed May 11 17:08:42 2005
11110 From: alm at woodnet.ru (alm)
11111 Date: Wed May 11 17:07:47 2005
11112 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.41 general lang issue
11113 Message-ID: <42829E8A.4090000@woodnet.ru>
11114
11115 Hello everybody
11116 i just compiled ircservices 5.0.41 with DEF_LANGUAGE=LANG_RU
11117 all works fine, except strange response for /msg NickServ HELP REGISTER
11118 i got SYNTAX for UNSET command, and then, a normal general description
11119 for REGISTER. This is true for Russian, This is true for English throw
11120 Nickserv's SET LANGUAGE command. No changes in ru.l en_us.l...
11121
11122
11123 Responce looks like:
11124 -----------------------------------------------
11125 -->NICKSERV HELP REGISTER
11126
11127 -NickServ- Syntax: Syntax: UNSET {URL | EMAIL | INFO}
11128 -NickServ-
11129 -NickServ- Allows you to clear the URL (URL), E-mail address (EMAIL),
11130 -NickServ- or information text (INFO) associated with your nickname.
11131 -NickServ-
11132 -NickServ- Registers your nickname in the NickServ database. Once
11133 -NickServ- your nickname is registered, you can use the SET and ACCESS
11134 -NickServ- commands to configure your nickname's settings as you like
11135 -NickServ- them. Make sure you remember the password you use when
11136 -NickServ- registering; you'll need it to make changes to your nickname
11137 -NickServ- later. (Note that case matters! FIDO, Fido, and fido
11138 -NickServ- are all different passwords!)
11139 -NickServ- You may include an E-mail address when registering your
11140 -NickServ- nickname; you may also set one later using the SET EMAIL
11141 -NickServ- command.
11142 -NickServ- Guidelines on choosing passwords:
11143 -NickServ-
11144 -NickServ- Passwords should not be easily guessable. For example,
11145 -NickServ- using your real name as a password is a bad idea. Using
11146 -NickServ- your nickname as a password is a much worse idea and,
11147 -NickServ- in fact, NickServ will not allow it. Also, short
11148 -NickServ- passwords are vulnerable to trial-and-error searches, so
11149 -NickServ- you should choose a password at least 5 characters long.
11150
11151
11152 --------------------------------------------
11153
11154 is it widespread issue?
11155
11156 P.S.
11157 some time ago i have a lot of fun with lang files for ircservices 5.0.0,
11158 but never see such strange behaviour
11159 P.P.S
11160 sorry for my strange english ;)
11161 thnx
11162
11163
11164
11165
11166
11167
11168
11169
11170 From alm at woodnet.ru Wed May 11 17:13:00 2005
11171 From: alm at woodnet.ru (alm)
11172 Date: Wed May 11 17:11:49 2005
11173 Subject: [IRCServices] Checkout for last post 5.0.51
11174 Message-ID: <42829F8C.2040907@woodnet.ru>
11175
11176 Sorry! my stupid hands...
11177 post 5.0.41 general lang issue
11178 of couse, it's 5.0.51
11179
11180 From lordbergee at comcast.net Wed May 11 17:35:29 2005
11181 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
11182 Date: Wed May 11 17:33:41 2005
11183 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.41 general lang issue
11184 In-Reply-To: <42829E8A.4090000@woodnet.ru>
11185 References: <42829E8A.4090000@woodnet.ru>
11186 Message-ID: <4282A4D1.1080401@comcast.net>
11187
11188 I noticed this a long time ago on my services, it would have been an
11189 unmodified version 5.0.x (default language would have been english). I
11190 never reported it because I could not figure out what actions eventually
11191 caused services to do this. I also have to admit I haven't seen it
11192 happen to me in a very long time.
11193
11194 Bergee
11195
11196 alm wrote:
11197 > Hello everybody
11198 > i just compiled ircservices 5.0.41 with DEF_LANGUAGE=LANG_RU
11199 > all works fine, except strange response for /msg NickServ HELP REGISTER
11200 > i got SYNTAX for UNSET command, and then, a normal general description
11201 > for REGISTER. This is true for Russian, This is true for English throw
11202 > Nickserv's SET LANGUAGE command. No changes in ru.l en_us.l...
11203 >
11204 > Responce looks like:
11205 > -----------------------------------------------
11206 > -->NICKSERV HELP REGISTER
11207 >
11208 > -NickServ- Syntax: Syntax: UNSET {URL | EMAIL | INFO}
11209 > -NickServ-
11210 > -NickServ- Allows you to clear the URL (URL), E-mail address (EMAIL),
11211 > -NickServ- or information text (INFO) associated with your nickname.
11212 > -NickServ-
11213 > -NickServ- Registers your nickname in the NickServ database. Once
11214 *snip*
11215 > -NickServ- you should choose a password at least 5 characters long.
11216 >
11217 > --------------------------------------------
11218 >
11219 > is it widespread issue?
11220 >
11221 > P.S.
11222 > some time ago i have a lot of fun with lang files for ircservices 5.0.0,
11223 > but never see such strange behaviour
11224 > P.P.S
11225 > sorry for my strange english ;)
11226 > thnx
11227 From achurch at achurch.org Thu May 12 12:03:34 2005
11228 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11229 Date: Wed May 11 20:06:19 2005
11230 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.41 general lang issue
11231 In-Reply-To: <42829E8A.4090000@woodnet.ru>
11232 Message-ID: <4282c822.51534@msgid.achurch.org>
11233
11234 >Hello everybody
11235 >i just compiled ircservices 5.0.41 with DEF_LANGUAGE=LANG_RU
11236 >all works fine, except strange response for /msg NickServ HELP REGISTER
11237 >i got SYNTAX for UNSET command, and then, a normal general description
11238 >for REGISTER. This is true for Russian, This is true for English throw
11239 >Nickserv's SET LANGUAGE command. No changes in ru.l en_us.l...
11240
11241 Fixed, thanks for the report. (This will happen if you have
11242 NSRequireEmail disabled and reload the configuration file, e.g. through
11243 OperServ REHASH.)
11244
11245 --Andrew Church
11246 achurch@achurch.org
11247 http://achurch.org/
11248 From achurch at achurch.org Thu May 12 13:04:05 2005
11249 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11250 Date: Wed May 11 21:05:31 2005
11251 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.52 released
11252 Message-ID: <4282d601.67453@msgid.achurch.org>
11253
11254 Services 5.0.52 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
11255
11256 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
11257 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
11258
11259 a691ee3069f13a9111aa86ed8e2b076b ircservices-5.0.52.tar.gz
11260 8f830a25ec9248b3d1299deba69e72cb ircservices-5.0.52.diff.gz
11261 74b57dbca01177574c1993416cd29bad ircservices-5.0.52-1.i386.rpm
11262 8c101c7906ca8c0cb4d910285e70b786 ircservices_5.0.52-1_i386.deb
11263
11264 The mirrors should have it shortly.
11265
11266 Changes in version 5.0.52
11267 -------------------------
11268 2005/05/12 Fixed occasional corruption of the NickServ REGISTER syntax
11269 string upon reconfiguration (OperServ REHASH).
11270 Reported by <alm@woodnet.ru>
11271 2005/05/06 Fixed attempts to send PING messages before connecting to
11272 the server. Reported by Craig McLure
11273 <Craig@chatspike.net>
11274
11275 --Andrew Church
11276 achurch@achurch.org
11277 http://achurch.org/
11278 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Thu May 12 03:55:19 2005
11279 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
11280 Date: Thu May 12 03:55:24 2005
11281 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.52
11282 Message-ID: <000d01c556e1$1736e0f0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
11283
11284 After compiling and starting 5.0.52, this is seen in the log:
11285
11286 [May 12 06:37:33 2005] IRC Services 5.0.52 starting up
11287 [May 12 06:37:33 2005] httpd/main: Listening on xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx
11288 [May 12 06:37:33 2005] unknown message from server (:some.irc.server 432
11289 NickServ ChanServ :Erroneous Nickname: Reserved for Services)
11290
11291 And services does not link. On the IRCD side, this is seen:
11292
11293 [6:37am] -some.irc.server- Forbidding Q-lined nick ChanServ from
11294 NickServ[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx].
11295
11296 Recompiled Services 5.0.51 and it starts just fine. Running Unreal3.2.3.
11297 Nothing has changed in either configuration files, as 5.0.51 ran just fine.
11298
11299 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu May 12 03:57:07 2005
11300 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
11301 Date: Thu May 12 03:57:03 2005
11302 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.52
11303 In-Reply-To: <000d01c556e1$1736e0f0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
11304 References: <000d01c556e1$1736e0f0$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
11305 Message-ID: <42833683.7010302@frostycoolslug.com>
11306
11307 lol, i was JUST about to post the same
11308
11309 [May 12 11:52:12 2005] unknown message from server
11310 (:stitch.chatspike.net 432 * OperServ :Erroneous Nickname: Reserved for
11311 Services)
11312 [May 12 11:52:12 2005] unknown message from server
11313 (:stitch.chatspike.net 432 Global NickServ :Erroneous Nickname: Reserved
11314 for Services)
11315 [May 12 11:52:17 2005] unknown message from server
11316 (:stitch.chatspike.net 432 Global ChanServ :Erroneous Nickname: Reserved
11317 for Services)
11318
11319 /****************************************
11320 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
11321 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
11322 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
11323 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
11324 ****************************************/
11325
11326 Luniz wrote:
11327 > After compiling and starting 5.0.52, this is seen in the log:
11328 >
11329 > [May 12 06:37:33 2005] IRC Services 5.0.52 starting up
11330 > [May 12 06:37:33 2005] httpd/main: Listening on xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx
11331 > [May 12 06:37:33 2005] unknown message from server (:some.irc.server 432
11332 > NickServ ChanServ :Erroneous Nickname: Reserved for Services)
11333 >
11334 > And services does not link. On the IRCD side, this is seen:
11335 >
11336 > [6:37am] -some.irc.server- Forbidding Q-lined nick ChanServ from
11337 > NickServ[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx].
11338 >
11339 > Recompiled Services 5.0.51 and it starts just fine. Running Unreal3.2.3.
11340 > Nothing has changed in either configuration files, as 5.0.51 ran just fine.
11341 >
11342 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11343 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11344 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11345 >
11346 >
11347
11348 From achurch at achurch.org Fri May 13 00:07:10 2005
11349 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11350 Date: Thu May 12 08:07:42 2005
11351 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.53 released
11352 Message-ID: <42837132.15230@msgid.achurch.org>
11353
11354 Services 5.0.53 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
11355
11356 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
11357 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
11358
11359 dd3e6204ba301ec1d9879b19e8572173 ircservices-5.0.53.tar.gz
11360 b624ee8cefdb5f84c664f991f4f61aa9 ircservices-5.0.53.diff.gz
11361 bc6f2af197fe62db0bfdab9730c801ea ircservices-5.0.53-1.i386.rpm
11362 16adaa2ccc6e6916557b389009c8ca91 ircservices_5.0.53-1_i386.deb
11363
11364 The mirrors should have it shortly.
11365
11366 Changes in version 5.0.53
11367 -------------------------
11368 2005/05/12 Fixed bug causing server connection to fail.
11369
11370 --Andrew Church
11371 achurch@achurch.org
11372 http://achurch.org/
11373 From gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org Thu May 12 08:17:11 2005
11374 From: gluniz at luniz.dyndns.org (Luniz)
11375 Date: Thu May 12 08:17:27 2005
11376 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.53 released
11377 References: <42837132.15230@msgid.achurch.org>
11378 Message-ID: <004f01c55705$aba75390$0200a8c0@glunizpc>
11379
11380 All good now. Thanks for the quick update.
11381
11382 ----- Original Message -----
11383 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
11384 To: "services" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
11385 Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:07 AM
11386 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.53 released
11387
11388
11389 > Services 5.0.53 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
11390 >
11391 > http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
11392 > ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
11393 >
11394 > dd3e6204ba301ec1d9879b19e8572173 ircservices-5.0.53.tar.gz
11395 > b624ee8cefdb5f84c664f991f4f61aa9 ircservices-5.0.53.diff.gz
11396 > bc6f2af197fe62db0bfdab9730c801ea ircservices-5.0.53-1.i386.rpm
11397 > 16adaa2ccc6e6916557b389009c8ca91 ircservices_5.0.53-1_i386.deb
11398 >
11399 > The mirrors should have it shortly.
11400 >
11401 > Changes in version 5.0.53
11402 > -------------------------
11403 > 2005/05/12 Fixed bug causing server connection to fail.
11404 >
11405 > --Andrew Church
11406 > achurch@achurch.org
11407 > http://achurch.org/
11408 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11409 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11410 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11411 From msmith at uss-starlord.org Fri May 20 09:23:57 2005
11412 From: msmith at uss-starlord.org (Michael D. Smith)
11413 Date: Fri May 20 09:24:15 2005
11414 Subject: [IRCServices] Support for Ultimate 3 IRCd
11415 Message-ID: <6.2.3.0.2.20050520122306.02424178@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
11416
11417 Will there be any support built in for IRC Services running the
11418 Ultimate IRCd 3.* branch?
11419
11420 TIA!
11421
11422 Regards,
11423 Mike
11424
11425 Chief Network Administrator
11426 FleetChat IRC Services
11427
11428 "Net boy, net girl/Send your impulse 'round the world/
11429 Put your message in a modem/And throw it in the Cyber Sea"
11430 Lyrics "Virtruality" - Album "Test for Echo" - Rush, 1996 (Lee,
11431 Lifeson, Peart)
11432
11433
11434 From achurch at achurch.org Tue May 31 13:09:41 2005
11435 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11436 Date: Mon May 30 21:11:48 2005
11437 Subject: [IRCServices] Support for Ultimate 3 IRCd
11438 In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.0.2.20050520122306.02424178@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
11439 Message-ID: <429be3e8.22232@msgid.achurch.org>
11440
11441 Sorry, for the late reply, I've been busy...
11442
11443 >Will there be any support built in for IRC Services running the
11444 >Ultimate IRCd 3.* branch?
11445
11446 According to user reports, Ultimate 3.x will work with the Bahamut
11447 protocol module, but I'm not familiar with Ultimate itself so I don't know
11448 what limitations there might be, or whether more recent versions of
11449 Ultimate will work with the current version of Services. Try it out, and
11450 let me know if there are problems.
11451
11452 --Andrew Church
11453 achurch@achurch.org
11454 http://achurch.org/
11455 From holger.baust at freenet-ag.de Thu Jun 2 03:45:40 2005
11456 From: holger.baust at freenet-ag.de (Holger Baust)
11457 Date: Thu Jun 2 03:45:56 2005
11458 Subject: [IRCServices] 2 Problems with 5.0.53 and one question...
11459 Message-ID: <20050602104540.GA31872@freenet-ag.de>
11460
11461 Hi there...
11462 I just installed 5.0.53 with Unreal 3.2.3.
11463 But there are 2 Problems.
11464
11465 Browsing the ircservices DB with a webbrowser via http module and
11466 dbacces and using the xml-export feature causes the following error
11467 message:
11468 *** Global -- from services.ircchat.freenet.de: Network buffer size
11469 exceeded ignore threshold (95%), ignoring PRIVMSGs
11470 The resulting xml-file is 16MB and after this message no one else but
11471 ircopers can communicate with the services.
11472
11473 I tried Unreal 3.2.3 with extended nicknamesupport, allowing latin-1
11474 chars in nicknames. Users are able to register such a nick (perhaps with
11475 german u-umlaut) but /ns link reports that such a nick is an erroneus
11476 Nickname.
11477
11478 Is there an other way to modify the db (resetting all user's language,
11479 and dropping all forbidden/suspended nicks/chans) than modifying the
11480 xml export?
11481
11482
11483
11484 Regards,
11485 Holger Baust
11486
11487 --
11488 Holger Baust Holger.Baust@freenet-ag.de
11489 freenet.de AG Tel.: +49 211 53087 0
11490 WillstaetterStr. 13, D-40549 Duesseldorf Fax.: +49 211 5381573
11491 Vorstand: Eckhard Spoerr (Vors.), Axel Krieger, Stephan Esch, Eric Berger
11492 Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 74048
11493 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Prof. Dr. Helmut Thoma
11494
11495 -------------- next part --------------
11496 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
11497 Name: not available
11498 Type: application/pgp-signature
11499 Size: 189 bytes
11500 Desc: Digital signature
11501 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050602/24977027/attachment.pgp
11502 From brain at winbot.co.uk Thu Jun 2 03:55:28 2005
11503 From: brain at winbot.co.uk (Craig Edwards)
11504 Date: Thu Jun 2 03:55:09 2005
11505 Subject: [IRCServices] 2 Problems with 5.0.53 and one question...
11506 In-Reply-To: <20050602104540.GA31872@freenet-ag.de>
11507 References: <20050602104540.GA31872@freenet-ag.de>
11508 Message-ID: <429EE5A0.1030201@winbot.co.uk>
11509
11510 since when did the RFC state that you could put umlauts in nicks? :)
11511
11512 i dont know what everyone elses stance on unreal's NICKCHARS thing is,
11513 but personally i think its a stupid idea with the potential to break a
11514 great many clients. Just my 0.02c worth.
11515
11516 Have you tried increasing the network buffer size temporarily until a
11517 fix for this is produced?
11518
11519 Thanks,
11520 Brain
11521
11522 Holger Baust wrote:
11523 > Hi there...
11524 > I just installed 5.0.53 with Unreal 3.2.3.
11525 > But there are 2 Problems.
11526 >
11527 > Browsing the ircservices DB with a webbrowser via http module and
11528 > dbacces and using the xml-export feature causes the following error
11529 > message:
11530 > *** Global -- from services.ircchat.freenet.de: Network buffer size
11531 > exceeded ignore threshold (95%), ignoring PRIVMSGs
11532 > The resulting xml-file is 16MB and after this message no one else but
11533 > ircopers can communicate with the services.
11534 >
11535 > I tried Unreal 3.2.3 with extended nicknamesupport, allowing latin-1
11536 > chars in nicknames. Users are able to register such a nick (perhaps with
11537 > german u-umlaut) but /ns link reports that such a nick is an erroneus
11538 > Nickname.
11539 >
11540 > Is there an other way to modify the db (resetting all user's language,
11541 > and dropping all forbidden/suspended nicks/chans) than modifying the
11542 > xml export?
11543 >
11544 >
11545 >
11546 > Regards,
11547 > Holger Baust
11548 >
11549 >
11550 >
11551 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
11552 >
11553 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11554 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11555 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11556
11557 --
11558 WinBot IRC client developer: http://www.winbot.co.uk
11559 ChatSpike - The users network: http://www.chatspike.net
11560 InspIRCd - Modular IRC server: http://www.inspircd.org
11561 Online RPG Developer: http://www.ssod.org
11562 --
11563 From vjekon at gmail.com Mon Jun 13 09:40:33 2005
11564 From: vjekon at gmail.com (Vjeko Konc)
11565 Date: Mon Jun 13 09:40:48 2005
11566 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11567 Message-ID: <4dcb86a0506130940350ed967@mail.gmail.com>
11568
11569 In my opinion, ChanServ should send a memo automagically when the
11570 channel founder changes, to remind the new founder that he/she
11571 -should- change the founder password to avoid incidents where the
11572 previous owner has a change of heart, or whatnot.
11573 From msmith at uss-starlord.org Thu Jun 16 09:59:03 2005
11574 From: msmith at uss-starlord.org (Michael D. Smith)
11575 Date: Thu Jun 16 09:59:11 2005
11576 Subject: [IRCServices] Support for Ultimate 3 IRCd
11577 In-Reply-To: <429be3e8.22232@msgid.achurch.org>
11578 References: <6.2.3.0.2.20050520122306.02424178@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
11579 <429be3e8.22232@msgid.achurch.org>
11580 Message-ID: <6.2.3.0.2.20050616125802.02472788@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
11581
11582 At 00:09 5/31/2005, Andrew Church wrote:
11583 > According to user reports, Ultimate 3.x will work with the Bahamut
11584 >protocol module, but I'm not familiar with Ultimate itself so I don't know
11585 >what limitations there might be, or whether more recent versions of
11586 >Ultimate will work with the current version of Services. Try it out, and
11587 >let me know if there are problems.
11588
11589 Andy,
11590
11591 I just wanted to let you know there were no problems with installing
11592 Services on the new Ultimate 3.x branch.
11593
11594 Was clean as a whistle, as far as I can tell right now.
11595
11596 Thanks!
11597
11598 Regards,
11599 Mike
11600
11601 Chief Network Administrator
11602 FleetChat IRC Services
11603
11604 "Net boy, net girl/Send your impulse 'round the world/
11605 Put your message in a modem/And throw it in the Cyber Sea"
11606 Lyrics "Virtruality" - Album "Test for Echo" - Rush, 1996 (Lee,
11607 Lifeson, Peart)
11608
11609
11610 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jun 17 02:02:26 2005
11611 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11612 Date: Thu Jun 16 17:18:01 2005
11613 Subject: [IRCServices] 2 Problems with 5.0.53 and one question...
11614 In-Reply-To: <20050602104540.GA31872@freenet-ag.de>
11615 Message-ID: <42b216ac.65734@msgid.achurch.org>
11616
11617 >Browsing the ircservices DB with a webbrowser via http module and
11618 >dbacces and using the xml-export feature causes the following error
11619 >message:
11620 >*** Global -- from services.ircchat.freenet.de: Network buffer size
11621 >exceeded ignore threshold (95%), ignoring PRIVMSGs
11622 >The resulting xml-file is 16MB and after this message no one else but
11623 >ircopers can communicate with the services.
11624
11625 The situation should resolve itself as soon as your browser completely
11626 receives the file (unless your browser or proxy keeps the connection open,
11627 in which case you have to wait for the connection to be closed). If this
11628 is a problem, the only real answer is to raise your network buffer size to
11629 something larger than the XML output size.
11630
11631 >I tried Unreal 3.2.3 with extended nicknamesupport, allowing latin-1
11632 >chars in nicknames.
11633
11634 Services doesn't support NICKCHARS. There are too many issues with
11635 non-ASCII nicks that aren't resolved in a standard (e.g. RFC) way. I may
11636 look into either adding support or writing such a standard during 5.1
11637 development, but as far as current versions of Services are concerned, the
11638 answer is "don't use NICKCHARS".
11639
11640 >Is there an other way to modify the db (resetting all user's language,
11641 >and dropping all forbidden/suspended nicks/chans) than modifying the
11642 >xml export?
11643
11644 No.
11645
11646 --Andrew Church
11647 achurch@achurch.org
11648 http://achurch.org/
11649 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jun 17 02:01:02 2005
11650 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11651 Date: Thu Jun 16 17:18:28 2005
11652 Subject: [IRCServices] Support for Ultimate 3 IRCd
11653 In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.0.2.20050616125802.02472788@defiant.uss-starlord.org>
11654 Message-ID: <42b216c2.65744@msgid.achurch.org>
11655
11656 >I just wanted to let you know there were no problems with installing
11657 >Services on the new Ultimate 3.x branch.
11658 >
11659 >Was clean as a whistle, as far as I can tell right now.
11660
11661 Thanks for the report. I'll still look into Ultimate when I have a
11662 chance, but since there don't seem to be any serious issues I'll probably
11663 delay any real work until version 5.1.
11664
11665 --Andrew Church
11666 achurch@achurch.org
11667 http://achurch.org/
11668 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jun 17 02:11:47 2005
11669 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11670 Date: Thu Jun 16 17:18:45 2005
11671 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11672 In-Reply-To: <4dcb86a0506130940350ed967@mail.gmail.com>
11673 Message-ID: <42b216d3.65752@msgid.achurch.org>
11674
11675 >In my opinion, ChanServ should send a memo automagically when the
11676 >channel founder changes, to remind the new founder that he/she
11677 >-should- change the founder password to avoid incidents where the
11678 >previous owner has a change of heart, or whatnot.
11679
11680 Too easy to use for memo bombs:
11681
11682 /cs set #channel founder VictimNick
11683 /cs set #channel founder MyNick
11684 /ms del all
11685 /cs set #channel founder VictimNick
11686 ...
11687
11688 I can see an argument for invalidating the old password and requiring
11689 the new founder to set a new password, but that's a significant change that
11690 wouldn't be implemented before version 5.1, if at all.
11691
11692 --Andrew Church
11693 achurch@achurch.org
11694 http://achurch.org/
11695 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 18:15:19 2005
11696 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
11697 Date: Thu Jun 16 18:15:35 2005
11698 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11699 In-Reply-To: <42b216d3.65752@msgid.achurch.org>
11700 Message-ID: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJAEEICAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11701
11702 Hi,
11703
11704 With regards to the idea of setting access willy nilly, would it be
11705 possible to craft a module which means the victim can _choose_
11706 whether they want to be added to a channel's ACL or not?
11707
11708 ie:
11709
11710 /cs aop #chan add bleh
11711
11712 Someguy is trying to add you as AOP on #chan, type /msg ChanServ ACCEPT
11713 #bleh
11714 to be added.
11715
11716 Something like that perhaps?
11717 (Not sure how it'd work with the ACCESS system however.
11718
11719 Thanks,
11720 w00t
11721
11722 -----Original Message-----
11723 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
11724 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of Andrew Church
11725 Sent: Friday, 17 June 2005 3:12 AM
11726 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
11727 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11728
11729
11730 Too easy to use for memo bombs:
11731
11732 /cs set #channel founder VictimNick
11733 /cs set #channel founder MyNick
11734 /ms del all
11735 /cs set #channel founder VictimNick
11736
11737 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jun 17 14:10:31 2005
11738 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11739 Date: Thu Jun 16 22:12:38 2005
11740 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11741 In-Reply-To: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJAEEICAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11742 Message-ID: <42b25bbf.72730@msgid.achurch.org>
11743
11744 >With regards to the idea of setting access willy nilly, would it be
11745 >possible to craft a module which means the victim can _choose_
11746 >whether they want to be added to a channel's ACL or not?
11747
11748 I don't see what the point of this would be; there's no inherent harm
11749 in being added to an access list (well, unless you have an insecure client
11750 or a lack of security consciousness, but that's a separate issue).
11751
11752 --Andrew Church
11753 achurch@achurch.org
11754 http://achurch.org/
11755 From vjekon at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 22:22:08 2005
11756 From: vjekon at gmail.com (Vjeko Konc)
11757 Date: Thu Jun 16 22:22:18 2005
11758 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11759 In-Reply-To: <42b25bbf.72730@msgid.achurch.org>
11760 References: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJAEEICAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11761 <42b25bbf.72730@msgid.achurch.org>
11762 Message-ID: <4dcb86a05061622222d35e6@mail.gmail.com>
11763
11764 > I don't see what the point of this would be; there's no inherent harm
11765 > in being added to an access list (well, unless you have an insecure client
11766 > or a lack of security consciousness, but that's a separate issue).
11767
11768 Well there is a way to check (without being an oper) if two nicks are
11769 linked by adding nick1 to the access list and trying to delete nick2,
11770 but I don't see how that could be avoided even if a confirmation was
11771 required.
11772 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 22:21:56 2005
11773 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
11774 Date: Thu Jun 16 22:22:22 2005
11775 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11776 In-Reply-To: <42b25bbf.72730@msgid.achurch.org>
11777 Message-ID: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJIEEKCAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11778
11779 The problem is one I was hearing about last night in anope's channel as far
11780 as I can remember
11781 - where a bunch of morons were randomly throwing access entries to random
11782 people and generally
11783 increasing memory use/etc/etc. He was wanting a module to stop this, it was
11784 just wandering around
11785 my mind. Anyhow, I'll drop the idea.
11786
11787 Thanks,
11788 w00t.
11789
11790 -----Original Message-----
11791 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
11792 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of Andrew Church
11793 Sent: Friday, 17 June 2005 3:11 PM
11794 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
11795 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11796
11797
11798 >With regards to the idea of setting access willy nilly, would it be
11799 >possible to craft a module which means the victim can _choose_
11800 >whether they want to be added to a channel's ACL or not?
11801
11802 I don't see what the point of this would be; there's no inherent harm
11803 in being added to an access list (well, unless you have an insecure client
11804 or a lack of security consciousness, but that's a separate issue).
11805
11806 --Andrew Church
11807 achurch@achurch.org
11808 http://achurch.org/
11809 ------------------------------------------------------------------
11810 To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11811 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11812
11813 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jun 17 15:45:52 2005
11814 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11815 Date: Thu Jun 16 23:47:56 2005
11816 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11817 In-Reply-To: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJIEEKCAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11818 Message-ID: <42b27216.73015@msgid.achurch.org>
11819
11820 >The problem is one I was hearing about last night in anope's channel as far
11821 >as I can remember
11822 >- where a bunch of morons were randomly throwing access entries to random
11823 >people and generally
11824 >increasing memory use/etc/etc.
11825
11826 Well, that's hard to avoid--if you block access lists, they'll just
11827 use autokicks, or memos, or what have you. My suggestion would be the
11828 generous application of a LART. ;)
11829
11830 --Andrew Church
11831 achurch@achurch.org
11832 http://achurch.org/
11833 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Thu Jun 16 23:51:48 2005
11834 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
11835 Date: Thu Jun 16 23:52:12 2005
11836 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11837 In-Reply-To: <42b27216.73015@msgid.achurch.org>
11838 Message-ID: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJAEELCAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11839
11840 Can I enquire what on earth a LART is? ;)
11841
11842 -----Original Message-----
11843 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
11844 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of Andrew Church
11845 Sent: Friday, 17 June 2005 4:46 PM
11846 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
11847 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11848
11849
11850 Well, that's hard to avoid--if you block access lists, they'll just
11851 use autokicks, or memos, or what have you. My suggestion would be the
11852 generous application of a LART. ;)
11853
11854 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Thu Jun 16 23:55:15 2005
11855 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
11856 Date: Thu Jun 16 23:56:19 2005
11857 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11858 In-Reply-To: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJAEELCAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11859 References: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJAEELCAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11860 Message-ID: <42B273D2.80904@frostycoolslug.com>
11861
11862 Google Search for define: LART:
11863 Definitions of LART on the Web:
11864
11865 * The Linux Advanced Radio Terminal (LART) is a compact energy
11866 efficient, embedded computer with a standard configuration of 32MB DRAM
11867 and 4MB Flash ROM. Originally developed at the University of Delft.
11868
11869 Google Search for LART +Acronym:
11870 Short for Luser Attitude Adjustment Tool, as in "The spammer was
11871 sharply LARTed right away and lost his account."
11872
11873 Acronym for Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool
11874
11875 Short for Loser Attitude Readjustment Tool, refers to changing spammers'
11876 attitude by taking steps to kick them off the Internet.
11877
11878 btw, welcome back Andy, bee a while since i saw you about here.
11879
11880 with responce to andys mail: i quite agree, theres more than one way to
11881 increase services RAM usage..
11882
11883 /****************************************
11884 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
11885 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
11886 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
11887 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
11888 ****************************************/
11889
11890 w00t wrote:
11891 > Can I enquire what on earth a LART is? ;)
11892 >
11893 > -----Original Message-----
11894 > From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
11895 > [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of Andrew Church
11896 > Sent: Friday, 17 June 2005 4:46 PM
11897 > To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
11898 > Subject: RE: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11899 >
11900 >
11901 > Well, that's hard to avoid--if you block access lists, they'll just
11902 > use autokicks, or memos, or what have you. My suggestion would be the
11903 > generous application of a LART. ;)
11904 >
11905 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
11906 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
11907 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
11908 >
11909 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Jun 17 16:09:56 2005
11910 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
11911 Date: Fri Jun 17 00:11:33 2005
11912 Subject: [IRCServices] ChanServ memo to new channel founder
11913 In-Reply-To: <42B273D2.80904@frostycoolslug.com>
11914 Message-ID: <42b2779e.73072@msgid.achurch.org>
11915
11916 >Acronym for Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool
11917
11918 Yeah, that. (:
11919
11920 >btw, welcome back Andy, bee a while since i saw you about here.
11921
11922 And it may be a while again--work has been keeping me busy lately,
11923 plus I've got a number of family-related activities coming up. So please
11924 give me more leeway than usual on replies...
11925
11926 --Andrew Church
11927 achurch@achurch.org
11928 http://achurch.org/
11929 From masterclif at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 22:10:00 2005
11930 From: masterclif at gmail.com (clif master)
11931 Date: Tue Jun 28 22:10:12 2005
11932 Subject: [IRCServices] Who to message
11933 Message-ID: <9678c89905062822103999c77c@mail.gmail.com>
11934
11935 Who would a person talk to for a breach in policy??? Should I go to a
11936 certain channel or something???
11937 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Tue Jun 28 22:21:18 2005
11938 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
11939 Date: Tue Jun 28 22:21:37 2005
11940 Subject: [IRCServices] Who to message
11941 In-Reply-To: <9678c89905062822103999c77c@mail.gmail.com>
11942 Message-ID: <DNEGIFBFOLDCIFPEHKPJKEFMCAAA.surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
11943
11944 I think you might have the wrong address or wrong idea :p.
11945
11946 This is the mailing list for ircservices (see
11947 http://www.ircservices.za.net).
11948 If you're talking about a breach in a network's policy, you'll need to talk
11949 to their staff. ;).
11950
11951 Ta,
11952 w00t.
11953
11954 -----Original Message-----
11955 From: ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
11956 [mailto:ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net]On Behalf Of clif
11957 master
11958 Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2005 3:10 PM
11959 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
11960 Subject: [IRCServices] Who to message
11961
11962 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Jul 1 06:10:45 2005
11963 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
11964 Date: Fri Jul 1 06:11:25 2005
11965 Subject: [IRCServices] 2 thinks:))
11966 Message-ID: <000501c57e3e$56d81100$054405d5@pc>
11967
11968 1) Any ServicesOP can add to services these types of S*Lines:
11969
11970 -OperServ- * added to SZLINE list.
11971 -OperServ- * added to SGLINE list.
11972 -OperServ- * added to SQLINE list.
11973
11974 2) I think Nickname of the services root should be always in noexpire mode
11975 and cant be dropped even if someone use the SU command.
11976
11977 From jfrates at gmail.com Sun Jul 10 12:30:05 2005
11978 From: jfrates at gmail.com (Jarrod Frates)
11979 Date: Sun Jul 10 12:30:15 2005
11980 Subject: [IRCServices] ircservices 5.0.53 on x86_64
11981 Message-ID: <979b3508050710123069c876e5@mail.gmail.com>
11982
11983 I've not found anything on the lists so far as to whether support for
11984 64-bit OSes is available or not, so I suppose that becomes the first
11985 question.
11986
11987 If it is, I'm having difficulties connecting to my UnrealIRCd 3.2.3
11988 server on the same system, which is running CentOS 4.1 x86_64. It
11989 seems like ircservices isn't even reaching the IRCd at all, though a
11990 32-bit version on another system is able to connect.
11991
11992 Here is an excerpt from the log entries of one attempt using
11993 ircservices -debug -debug going over the network portion. All of the
11994 modules load successfully before this.
11995
11996 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246165 2005] Initiated connection to irc.illuminus.com:6677
11997 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246264 2005] debug: Top of main loop
11998 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246416 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36975.990
11999 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246461 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12000 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246505 2005] debug: sockets: connect on fd 0 returned
12001 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246562 2005] debug: Sent: PROTOCTL SJOIN SJOIN2 SJ3
12002 NICKv2 VHP VL NOQUIT UMODE2 TOKEN NICKIP
12003 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246602 2005] debug: Sent: PASS :inagoddadavida
12004 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246637 2005] debug: Sent: SERVER
12005 services.illuminus.com 1 :U0-*-2 Services for IRC Networks
12006 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246672 2005] debug: Sent: :services.illuminus.com
12007 TSCTL SVSTIME 1121023440
12008 [Jul 10 12:24:00.246715 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12009 [Jul 10 12:24:03.246249 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12010 [Jul 10 12:24:03.246312 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36978.990
12011 [Jul 10 12:24:03.246347 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12012 [Jul 10 12:24:06.245637 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12013 [Jul 10 12:24:06.245720 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36981.989
12014 [Jul 10 12:24:06.245754 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12015 [Jul 10 12:24:09.245879 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12016 [Jul 10 12:24:09.245955 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36984.989
12017 [Jul 10 12:24:09.245988 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12018 [Jul 10 12:24:12.245759 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12019 [Jul 10 12:24:12.245887 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36987.989
12020 [Jul 10 12:24:12.245922 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12021 [Jul 10 12:24:15.245380 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12022 [Jul 10 12:24:15.245455 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36990.989
12023 [Jul 10 12:24:15.245491 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12024 [Jul 10 12:24:18.244890 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12025 [Jul 10 12:24:18.244963 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36993.988
12026 [Jul 10 12:24:18.244997 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12027 [Jul 10 12:24:21.244449 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12028 [Jul 10 12:24:21.244529 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36996.988
12029 [Jul 10 12:24:21.244564 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12030 [Jul 10 12:24:24.244297 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12031 [Jul 10 12:24:24.244368 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 36999.988
12032 [Jul 10 12:24:24.244402 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12033 [Jul 10 12:24:27.243736 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12034 [Jul 10 12:24:27.243847 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 37002.987
12035 [Jul 10 12:24:27.243906 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12036 [Jul 10 12:24:30.243562 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12037 [Jul 10 12:24:30.243643 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 37005.987
12038 [Jul 10 12:24:30.243677 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12039 [Jul 10 12:24:33.242892 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12040 [Jul 10 12:24:33.242970 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 37008.986
12041 [Jul 10 12:24:33.243004 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12042 [Jul 10 12:24:36.242142 2005] debug: Top of main loop
12043 [Jul 10 12:24:36.242236 2005] debug: Checking timeouts at time_msec = 37011.986
12044 [Jul 10 12:24:36.242271 2005] debug: Finished timeout list
12045 [Jul 10 12:24:37.541157 2005] FATAL: Remote server returned: ERROR
12046 :Closing Link: [127.0.0.1] (Ping timeout)
12047
12048 It looks to me like it's not successfully making a network connection,
12049 but I'm not quite sure. Perhaps it needs to be built as 32-bit
12050 instead of 64-bit? If so, I'm not sure how to do that. Any
12051 assistance would be appreciated.
12052
12053
12054 Jarrod
12055 From wiggle at tiscali.be Sat Jul 16 09:34:13 2005
12056 From: wiggle at tiscali.be (Wiggle)
12057 Date: Sun Jul 17 00:55:08 2005
12058 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature request: services ignore / flag command /
12059 triggers
12060 Message-ID: <20050717075502.0AF4AC0FB32@sakura.ian-justman.com>
12061
12062 Hi,
12063
12064 First of all, I have been browsing the archives of this list to see if any
12065 of the things I am going to suggest have already been discussed and I think
12066 they have not, but forgive me if they have.
12067
12068 While I enjoy ircservices, I do believe it misses out on some interesting
12069 features some other services packages have. This is not me asking for
12070 ircservices to implement all the features another package has, since that
12071 would be pointless, but I do miss the following in ircservices:
12072
12073 *] SERVICES IGNORE: The ability for a services administrator to place a
12074 services ignore on a user. This would obviously make services ignore all
12075 commands sent to services by this wildcard hostmask. The reason why I would
12076 like for this to be implemented is because it would help manage services
12077 abuse. Especially if a certain user is known to abuse for example a specific
12078 services command, yet we do not yet wish to use full measures and
12079 gline/akill and suspending/forbidding the nickname didn't help (since he for
12080 example registered another nickname).
12081
12082 *] FLAG COMMAND (or some other name ;)): A command that would allow IRCops
12083 (services opers+) to add information about a certain user. For example:
12084 "User is a known spammer." This will allow opers to keep track of offenses
12085 and to act accordingly. Ideally this information woud show in /nickserv info
12086 <nickname> when triggered by an IRCop. Of course there would be a need to
12087 add/edit/remove the flag information. Can the current databases support
12088 this?
12089
12090 *] SPECIFIC TRIGGERS: Some system to protect services from abuse. This would
12091 go well with the services ignore command above. For example, when a user
12092 uses ChanServ's CLEAR USERS command 5 times in a row within a minute, it
12093 would be seen as abuse, and the user would be put on services ignore for 2
12094 minutes and a global operator notice would be sent. This could be added for
12095 other commands too, along with a specific flood setting, of for example 5:60
12096 (5 times in 60 seconds). In my opinion it would be great if /operserv
12097 trigger clear 5:60 - /operserv trigger clear 0 - /operserv trigger kick 6:4
12098 - etc would exist.
12099
12100 What do you guys think about this?
12101
12102 Regards,
12103
12104 Wiggle.
12105
12106
12107 From terry at bluelight.org.uk Tue Jul 26 14:51:10 2005
12108 From: terry at bluelight.org.uk (Terry)
12109 Date: Tue Jul 26 14:51:29 2005
12110 Subject: [IRCServices] OperServ help
12111 Message-ID: <42E6B04E.302@bluelight.org.uk>
12112
12113 I want to give a user as much perms as possible so i can admin the
12114 server from work
12115
12116 I did
12117 /msg OperServ OPER ADD user
12118
12119 That use the other end then logged in and did
12120
12121 /msg NickServ IDENTIFY password
12122
12123 Then tried to
12124 /msg operserv USERLIST as an example which gave permission denied.
12125
12126 In the logs it shows
12127
12128 [Jul 26 22:32:29 2005] operserv/main: Non-oper user@blah sent: USERLIST.
12129
12130 So i am not quite sure where the problem lays.
12131 I think this is what i need.
12132
12133 *F.6. Trying to use OperServ gives me "Access denied", but my nick is in
12134 the ServicesRoot directive and is registered, and I've identified for my
12135 nick.*
12136
12137 You need to be opered (i.e. user mode +o from using /oper; this is
12138 different from channel operator mode) to access OperServ.
12139
12140 But i dont under stand this part ( user mode +o from using /oper; t )
12141 Cheers
12142
12143
12144 From om at inspircd.org Tue Jul 26 17:01:42 2005
12145 From: om at inspircd.org (Om)
12146 Date: Tue Jul 26 17:02:03 2005
12147 Subject: [IRCServices] OperServ help
12148 In-Reply-To: <42E6B04E.302@bluelight.org.uk>
12149 References: <42E6B04E.302@bluelight.org.uk>
12150 Message-ID: <42E6CEE6.1090102@inspircd.org>
12151
12152 Terry wrote:
12153
12154 > I want to give a user as much perms as possible so i can admin the
12155 > server from work
12156 >
12157 > I did
12158 > /msg OperServ OPER ADD user
12159 >
12160 > That use the other end then logged in and did
12161 >
12162 > /msg NickServ IDENTIFY password
12163 >
12164 > Then tried to
12165 > /msg operserv USERLIST as an example which gave permission denied.
12166 >
12167 > In the logs it shows
12168 >
12169 > [Jul 26 22:32:29 2005] operserv/main: Non-oper user@blah sent: USERLIST.
12170 >
12171 > So i am not quite sure where the problem lays.
12172 > I think this is what i need.
12173 >
12174 > *F.6. Trying to use OperServ gives me "Access denied", but my nick is
12175 > in the ServicesRoot directive and is registered, and I've identified
12176 > for my nick.*
12177 >
12178 > You need to be opered (i.e. user mode +o from using /oper; this is
12179 > different from channel operator mode) to access OperServ.
12180 >
12181 > But i dont under stand this part ( user mode +o from using /oper; t )
12182 > Cheers
12183 >
12184 >
12185 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12186 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12187 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12188 >
12189 When you use your IRCd's /oper command (/oper opernick operpass) then
12190 the IRCd sets the usermode +o on you.
12191 OperServ is denying access to all users that don't have the +o usermode,
12192 even if they are svsopers, so to use OperServ you need +o set on you.
12193 Which you get by /oper ing :)
12194
12195 Cheers
12196
12197 Om
12198 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Tue Jul 26 20:06:10 2005
12199 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
12200 Date: Tue Jul 26 20:06:22 2005
12201 Subject: [IRCServices] OperServ help
12202 In-Reply-To: <42E6CEE6.1090102@inspircd.org>
12203 References: <42E6B04E.302@bluelight.org.uk> <42E6CEE6.1090102@inspircd.org>
12204 Message-ID: <42E6FA22.8030500@frostycoolslug.com>
12205
12206 Om wrote:
12207 > Terry wrote:
12208 >
12209 >> I want to give a user as much perms as possible so i can admin the
12210 >> server from work
12211 >>
12212 >> I did
12213 >> /msg OperServ OPER ADD user
12214 >>
12215 >> That use the other end then logged in and did
12216 >>
12217 >> /msg NickServ IDENTIFY password
12218 >>
12219 >> Then tried to
12220 >> /msg operserv USERLIST as an example which gave permission denied.
12221 >>
12222 >> In the logs it shows
12223 >>
12224 >> [Jul 26 22:32:29 2005] operserv/main: Non-oper user@blah sent: USERLIST.
12225 >>
12226 >> So i am not quite sure where the problem lays.
12227 >> I think this is what i need.
12228 >>
12229 >> *F.6. Trying to use OperServ gives me "Access denied", but my nick is
12230 >> in the ServicesRoot directive and is registered, and I've identified
12231 >> for my nick.*
12232 >>
12233 >> You need to be opered (i.e. user mode +o from using /oper; this is
12234 >> different from channel operator mode) to access OperServ.
12235 >>
12236 >> But i dont under stand this part ( user mode +o from using /oper; t )
12237 >> Cheers
12238 >>
12239 >>
12240 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
12241 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12242 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12243 >>
12244 > When you use your IRCd's /oper command (/oper opernick operpass) then
12245 > the IRCd sets the usermode +o on you.
12246 > OperServ is denying access to all users that don't have the +o usermode,
12247 > even if they are svsopers, so to use OperServ you need +o set on you.
12248 > Which you get by /oper ing :)
12249 >
12250 > Cheers
12251 >
12252 > Om
12253 In addition, i think this is a security measure, in the event that
12254 someone 'cracked' my nickserv password (no matter how secure it is) they
12255 would still need my operator password to be able to do anything remotly
12256 dangerous (remembering that services can provide override, kill, kick,
12257 ban, op people when you are a services admin), imagine the chaos a
12258 compromised password could cause ;)
12259
12260 /****************************************
12261 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12262 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
12263 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
12264 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12265 ****************************************/
12266
12267 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12268 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12269 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12270 >
12271 >
12272
12273 From seckzi at gmail.com Tue Jul 26 22:07:59 2005
12274 From: seckzi at gmail.com (awyeah)
12275 Date: Tue Jul 26 22:08:13 2005
12276 Subject: [IRCServices] OperServ help
12277 In-Reply-To: <42E6B04E.302@bluelight.org.uk>
12278 References: <42E6B04E.302@bluelight.org.uk>
12279 Message-ID: <474d159a0507262207eefb2c6@mail.gmail.com>
12280
12281 Yeah will you need to be opered simple as that. Identify your o:line with
12282 the IRCd before you can gain SRA access.
12283
12284 /oper <username> <password>
12285
12286 After you are opered you will get an +o flag. Then depending upon which IRCd
12287 you use like for bahamut you have to manually set yourself +a or +A.
12288
12289 So after you have opered up, identify your Services Root nickname and you
12290 will get full control over services.
12291
12292 There is also a variable in services.conf which I am sure which you can
12293 enable or disable, which would toggle ON and OFF this setting. So maybe you
12294 have enabled it and people can't get services access unless they are opered
12295 up. So if you disable that directive/variable in the .conf file then you can
12296 get access without opering up.
12297
12298 But I stronly recommend you and all people on your network to oper up before
12299 gaining services access priviledges.
12300
12301 ./awyeah
12302
12303
12304
12305 On 7/27/05, Terry <terry@bluelight.org.uk> wrote:
12306 >
12307 > I want to give a user as much perms as possible so i can admin the
12308 > server from work
12309 >
12310 > I did
12311 > /msg OperServ OPER ADD user
12312 >
12313 > That use the other end then logged in and did
12314 >
12315 > /msg NickServ IDENTIFY password
12316 >
12317 > Then tried to
12318 > /msg operserv USERLIST as an example which gave permission denied.
12319 >
12320 > In the logs it shows
12321 >
12322 > [Jul 26 22:32:29 2005] operserv/main: Non-oper user@blah sent: USERLIST.
12323 >
12324 > So i am not quite sure where the problem lays.
12325 > I think this is what i need.
12326 >
12327 > *F.6. Trying to use OperServ gives me "Access denied", but my nick is in
12328 > the ServicesRoot directive and is registered, and I've identified for my
12329 > nick.*
12330 >
12331 > You need to be opered (i.e. user mode +o from using /oper; this is
12332 > different from channel operator mode) to access OperServ.
12333 >
12334 > But i dont under stand this part ( user mode +o from using /oper; t )
12335 > Cheers
12336 >
12337 >
12338 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12339 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12340 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12341 >
12342
12343
12344
12345 --
12346 ??awyeah?
12347
12348
12349 ==================================
12350 Email: awyeah@awyeah.org
12351 TCL Scripts: http://www.awyeah.org/
12352 MSN Messenger ID: awyeah@awyeah.org
12353 IRC: /server irc.awyeah.org:6667 <http://irc.awyeah.org:6667>, Nick: awyeah
12354 ==================================
12355 -------------- next part --------------
12356 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
12357 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050727/d65ed390/attachment.htm
12358 From ianj at esper.net Mon Aug 1 23:34:58 2005
12359 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
12360 Date: Mon Aug 1 23:35:08 2005
12361 Subject: [IRCServices] List outage
12362 Message-ID: <42EF1412.1010102@esper.net>
12363
12364
12365 Hi, all.
12366
12367 Due to an unforeseen DNS issue while I was away, the mailserver on which
12368 the lists are housed temporarily was unreachable.
12369
12370 My apologies for any ensuing mess this has created.
12371
12372 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
12373
12374 -----
12375 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official EsperNet business)
12376 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
12377 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
12378
12379 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
12380 From achurch at achurch.org Tue Aug 16 12:43:53 2005
12381 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12382 Date: Mon Aug 15 20:48:19 2005
12383 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.54 released
12384 Message-ID: <430161fa.27227@msgid.achurch.org>
12385
12386 Services 5.0.54 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
12387
12388 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
12389 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
12390
12391 589bf39dd5d702d5f9d5da1fe404d6b1 ircservices-5.0.54.tar.gz
12392 a642ab215913500be96f07f3fd735275 ircservices-5.0.54.diff.gz
12393 9e7e1fc75f61f59763776a61c94eefc4 ircservices-5.0.54-1.i386.rpm
12394 3b0b0e85c0ef51c24c818dda3935fc8c ircservices_5.0.54-1_i386.deb
12395
12396 The mirrors should have it shortly.
12397
12398 This is a maintenance release to take care of issues mentioned on the
12399 mailing list and fix errors and warnings when compiling under GCC 4.
12400
12401 Changes in version 5.0.54
12402 -------------------------
12403 2005/08/16 The ChanServ check_kick callback now passes the channel
12404 name as a string instead of the Channel structure, so
12405 the channel name can be known even if the channel is
12406 empty. Reported by Olly <olly@avansys.co.uk>
12407 2005/08/13 The S-line commands (SGLINE, SQLINE, and SZLINE) now check
12408 that "*" or similarly overbroad masks are not used.
12409 Suggested by Dionisios K. <vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr>
12410 2005/08/13 Fixed minor bugs in the code to check whether a new
12411 autokill is too broad (such as "*").
12412 2005/08/13 Fixed a compilation error (and many warnings) when
12413 compiling with GCC 4.
12414 2005/08/13 Added UNSET callbacks for NickServ and ChanServ. Suggested
12415 by Craig McLure <Craig@chatspike.net>
12416
12417 --Andrew Church
12418 achurch@achurch.org
12419 http://achurch.org/
12420 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Sun Aug 28 19:40:53 2005
12421 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
12422 Date: Sun Aug 28 19:41:58 2005
12423 Subject: [IRCServices] MemoServ feature
12424 Message-ID: <000301c5ac43$14f230d0$0d4405d5@pc>
12425
12426 I think it will be useful if services admins had the ability to send GLOBAL
12427 memos to every registered nickname or channel.
12428 It will be nice and users whould be informed very easy if a new feature is
12429 added to the network or a network policy update or ......
12430
12431 From martin at rodecker.nl Sun Aug 28 23:47:12 2005
12432 From: martin at rodecker.nl (Martin Pels)
12433 Date: Sun Aug 28 23:47:33 2005
12434 Subject: [IRCServices] MemoServ feature
12435 In-Reply-To: <000301c5ac43$14f230d0$0d4405d5@pc>
12436 References: <000301c5ac43$14f230d0$0d4405d5@pc>
12437 Message-ID: <1347.2001:610:108:45:211:43ff:fe12:add5.1125298032.squirrel@webmail.rodecker.nl>
12438
12439 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
12440 Hash: SHA1
12441
12442 On Mon, August 29, 2005 4:40, Dionisios K. said:
12443 > I think it will be useful if services admins had the ability to send
12444 > GLOBAL
12445 > memos to every registered nickname or channel.
12446 > It will be nice and users whould be informed very easy if a new feature is
12447 > added to the network or a network policy update or ......
12448 >
12449
12450 Isn't that what logonnews is meant for?
12451
12452 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12453 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12454 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12455 >
12456
12457
12458 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
12459 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
12460
12461 iD8DBQFDEq9vS4/1OagNDM4RAkyxAJ9+B0a+TWx8mchDetby4zZSxSgzxQCeJrWy
12462 aHXncYluhgWoUthCs6IgyWU=
12463 =ANee
12464 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
12465
12466 From paul.kain at gmail.com Sun Aug 28 23:53:09 2005
12467 From: paul.kain at gmail.com (Paul Kain)
12468 Date: Sun Aug 28 23:53:27 2005
12469 Subject: [IRCServices] MemoServ feature
12470 In-Reply-To: <-3193226059984920292@unknownmsgid>
12471 References: <000301c5ac43$14f230d0$0d4405d5@pc>
12472 <-3193226059984920292@unknownmsgid>
12473 Message-ID: <451ba792050828235354a721ac@mail.gmail.com>
12474
12475 people don't read the logonnews because its generic.
12476 If its directed directly at people in the form of a memo they would
12477 read it as it appears as though it was directed at them
12478
12479 as long as its not abused
12480
12481 Its the same as me trying to get you to read something by sticking it
12482 up on a peice of paper outside the men's bathroom. You are hardly
12483 going to take notice. However if its an email or similar of course you
12484 are going to pay close attention to it.
12485
12486 my 2c
12487
12488
12489
12490 On 8/29/05, Martin Pels <martin@rodecker.nl> wrote:
12491 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
12492 > Hash: SHA1
12493 >
12494 > On Mon, August 29, 2005 4:40, Dionisios K. said:
12495 > > I think it will be useful if services admins had the ability to send
12496 > > GLOBAL
12497 > > memos to every registered nickname or channel.
12498 > > It will be nice and users whould be informed very easy if a new feature is
12499 > > added to the network or a network policy update or ......
12500 > >
12501 >
12502 > Isn't that what logonnews is meant for?
12503 >
12504 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12505 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12506 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12507 > >
12508 >
12509 >
12510 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
12511 > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
12512 >
12513 > iD8DBQFDEq9vS4/1OagNDM4RAkyxAJ9+B0a+TWx8mchDetby4zZSxSgzxQCeJrWy
12514 > aHXncYluhgWoUthCs6IgyWU=
12515 > =ANee
12516 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
12517 >
12518 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12519 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12520 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12521 >
12522 From awesomeawyeah at gmail.com Mon Aug 29 00:39:28 2005
12523 From: awesomeawyeah at gmail.com (awyeah)
12524 Date: Mon Aug 29 00:39:38 2005
12525 Subject: [IRCServices] MemoServ feature
12526 In-Reply-To: <000301c5ac43$14f230d0$0d4405d5@pc>
12527 References: <000301c5ac43$14f230d0$0d4405d5@pc>
12528 Message-ID: <963b827d05082900394b45609a@mail.gmail.com>
12529
12530 There is a module for doing a very similar thing, but for ANOPE IRC
12531 Services. It basically sends a memo to all the OPERS, ADMINS and SRA's on
12532 OperServ's lists; basically your staff. Also other modules like sending
12533 memos to channel founders etc and more are availiable.
12534
12535 ./awyeah
12536
12537 On 8/29/05, Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr> wrote:
12538 >
12539 > I think it will be useful if services admins had the ability to send
12540 > GLOBAL
12541 > memos to every registered nickname or channel.
12542 > It will be nice and users whould be informed very easy if a new feature is
12543 > added to the network or a network policy update or ......
12544 >
12545 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12546 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12547 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12548 >
12549
12550
12551
12552 --
12553 ?awyeah?
12554
12555 ==================================
12556 Email: awyeah@awyeah.org
12557 TCL Scripts: http://www.awyeah.org/
12558 MSN Messenger ID: awyeah@awyeah.org
12559 IRC: /server irc.awyeah.org:6667 <http://irc.awyeah.org:6667>, Nick: awyeah
12560 ==================================
12561 -------------- next part --------------
12562 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
12563 URL: http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20050829/ff6aabbc/attachment-0001.htm
12564 From ianj at esper.net Fri Sep 9 10:24:14 2005
12565 From: ianj at esper.net (Ian R. Justman)
12566 Date: Fri Sep 9 10:24:34 2005
12567 Subject: [IRCServices] Test message
12568 Message-ID: <4321C53E.6000704@esper.net>
12569
12570
12571 Since I haven't seen anything for September yet, just making sure things
12572 are still working as they should.
12573
12574 Pardon the message.
12575
12576 --Ian R. Justman, Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network.
12577
12578 -----
12579 Ian R. Justman ianj@esper.net (Official
12580 EsperNet business)
12581 Co-Founder and Postmaster, The EsperNet IRC Network
12582 Server Administrator, chocobo.esper.net "IJ" on IRC
12583
12584 PGP/GPG keys available upon request, or from any PGP keyserver.
12585
12586 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sat Sep 10 01:54:56 2005
12587 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
12588 Date: Sat Sep 10 01:55:11 2005
12589 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12590 Message-ID: <43229F60.8000809@gmail.com>
12591
12592 As it's been a little quiet, let me be the devil to stir things up:
12593
12594 May I make a suggestion for nickserv, a command that lists all nicks
12595 linked to a nickname? Like LISTLINKS, only to be used on nicks other
12596 than yours. (Perhaps expanding LISTLINKS' functionality?)
12597
12598 Comments?
12599 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Sep 10 20:53:07 2005
12600 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12601 Date: Sat Sep 10 04:56:49 2005
12602 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12603 In-Reply-To: <43229F60.8000809@gmail.com>
12604 Message-ID: <4322c9f7.66320@msgid.achurch.org>
12605
12606 >As it's been a little quiet, let me be the devil to stir things up:
12607 >
12608 >May I make a suggestion for nickserv, a command that lists all nicks
12609 >linked to a nickname? Like LISTLINKS, only to be used on nicks other
12610 >than yours. (Perhaps expanding LISTLINKS' functionality?)
12611 >
12612 >Comments?
12613
12614 I'm way ahead of you. ;) /ns LISTLINKS <nick> as servadmin, ever
12615 since LISTLINKS was introduced in 4.2.0.
12616
12617 --Andrew Church
12618 achurch@achurch.org
12619 http://achurch.org/
12620 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sat Sep 10 05:03:58 2005
12621 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
12622 Date: Sat Sep 10 05:04:27 2005
12623 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12624 In-Reply-To: <4322c9f7.66320@msgid.achurch.org>
12625 References: <4322c9f7.66320@msgid.achurch.org>
12626 Message-ID: <4322CBAE.7060103@gmail.com>
12627
12628 Andrew Church wrote:
12629 >>As it's been a little quiet, let me be the devil to stir things up:
12630 >>
12631 >>May I make a suggestion for nickserv, a command that lists all nicks
12632 >>linked to a nickname? Like LISTLINKS, only to be used on nicks other
12633 >>than yours. (Perhaps expanding LISTLINKS' functionality?)
12634 >>
12635 >>Comments?
12636 >
12637 >
12638 > I'm way ahead of you. ;) /ns LISTLINKS <nick> as servadmin, ever
12639 > since LISTLINKS was introduced in 4.2.0.
12640 >
12641 > --Andrew Church
12642 > achurch@achurch.org
12643 > http://achurch.org/
12644 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12645 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12646 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12647 >
12648
12649 Ok, makes me feel a little stupid.. Can I ask why it's restricted to
12650 admins? A simple /ns info of two nicknames will tell you enough to know
12651 they are linked/the same person, but sometimes it's handy to know
12652 beforehand ;p
12653 From achurch at achurch.org Sat Sep 10 21:19:26 2005
12654 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12655 Date: Sat Sep 10 05:21:24 2005
12656 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12657 In-Reply-To: <4322CBAE.7060103@gmail.com>
12658 Message-ID: <4322cfbf.66417@msgid.achurch.org>
12659
12660 >Ok, makes me feel a little stupid.. Can I ask why it's restricted to
12661 >admins? A simple /ns info of two nicknames will tell you enough to know
12662 >they are linked/the same person, but sometimes it's handy to know
12663 >beforehand ;p
12664
12665 It's restricted because it can give out personal information. Maybe
12666 JoeUser doesn't want you to know that he has an alter ego known as
12667 UltimateFurry ;P
12668
12669 --Andrew Church
12670 achurch@achurch.org
12671 http://achurch.org/
12672 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sat Sep 10 05:24:11 2005
12673 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
12674 Date: Sat Sep 10 05:24:37 2005
12675 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12676 In-Reply-To: <4322cfbf.66417@msgid.achurch.org>
12677 References: <4322cfbf.66417@msgid.achurch.org>
12678 Message-ID: <4322D06B.5040508@gmail.com>
12679
12680 Andrew Church wrote:
12681 > It's restricted because it can give out personal information. Maybe
12682 > JoeUser doesn't want you to know that he has an alter ego known as
12683 > UltimateFurry ;P
12684
12685 Very valid point, not something I'd considered.. :p although if I had
12686 that kind of a situation, think I'd probably register a second nickname :P
12687 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Sep 10 05:25:56 2005
12688 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
12689 Date: Sat Sep 10 05:25:57 2005
12690 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12691 In-Reply-To: <4322cfbf.66417@msgid.achurch.org>
12692 References: <4322cfbf.66417@msgid.achurch.org>
12693 Message-ID: <4322D0D4.300@frostycoolslug.com>
12694
12695 Andrew Church wrote:
12696 > It's restricted because it can give out personal information. Maybe
12697 > JoeUser doesn't want you to know that he has an alter ego known as
12698 > UltimateFurry ;P
12699
12700 Is that really true?!?! I'll have to have words with JoeUser!
12701 But yeah, it makes sense to me.. Would take a while to do a /ns info on
12702 a large database and put the matches together (And who says all will
12703 match? If i use Fred-Work from Work, and Craig at home, the /ns info for
12704 them probably wont match, even if they are linked)
12705
12706 Just my 2pence
12707
12708 /****************************************
12709 * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12710 * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
12711 * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
12712 * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12713 ****************************************/
12714
12715 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sat Sep 10 05:37:59 2005
12716 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
12717 Date: Sat Sep 10 05:38:26 2005
12718 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12719 In-Reply-To: <4322D0D4.300@frostycoolslug.com>
12720 References: <4322cfbf.66417@msgid.achurch.org>
12721 <4322D0D4.300@frostycoolslug.com>
12722 Message-ID: <4322D3A7.1050102@gmail.com>
12723
12724 The main thing that makes me wonder is that LIST and LISTEMAIL aren't
12725 restricted to staff, so:
12726
12727 08:37 <w00teh> listemail w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12728 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- List of entries matching
12729 w00t@staff.chatspike.net:
12730 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- BHOFH
12731 w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12732 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- constantine
12733 w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12734 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- lame
12735 w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12736 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- nunjaw00t
12737 w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12738 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- w00t
12739 w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12740 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- w00t[afk]
12741 w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12742 08:37 -NickServ(services@chatspike.net)- w00teh
12743 w00t@staff.chatspike.net
12744
12745 worked just fine, and would probably be a better way to get info on
12746 someone you knew anyhow. So forget I said anything :)
12747
12748 Craig McLure wrote:
12749 > Andrew Church wrote:
12750 >
12751 >> It's restricted because it can give out personal information. Maybe
12752 >>JoeUser doesn't want you to know that he has an alter ego known as
12753 >>UltimateFurry ;P
12754 >
12755 >
12756 > Is that really true?!?! I'll have to have words with JoeUser!
12757 > But yeah, it makes sense to me.. Would take a while to do a /ns info on
12758 > a large database and put the matches together (And who says all will
12759 > match? If i use Fred-Work from Work, and Craig at home, the /ns info for
12760 > them probably wont match, even if they are linked)
12761 >
12762 > Just my 2pence
12763 >
12764 > /****************************************
12765 > * Craig "FrostyCoolSlug" McLure
12766 > * Craig@FrostyCoolSlug.com
12767 > * InspIRCd - http://www.inspircd.org
12768 > * ChatSpike - http://www.chatspike.net
12769 > ****************************************/
12770 >
12771 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12772 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12773 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12774 >
12775
12776 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 11 01:51:38 2005
12777 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
12778 Date: Sat Sep 10 09:54:24 2005
12779 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12780 In-Reply-To: <4322D3A7.1050102@gmail.com>
12781 Message-ID: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org>
12782
12783 >The main thing that makes me wonder is that LIST and LISTEMAIL aren't
12784 >restricted to staff, so:
12785
12786 But nicks (nickgroups, technically) also have a PRIVATE option,
12787 allowing them to select whether their nicks are shown in the list or not.
12788 Linked nicks all share the same flags, so you can't decide whether to allow
12789 certain links to be shown or not.
12790
12791 Though now that you bring it up, I could see an argument for allowing
12792 LISTLINKS on a user without PRIVATE set. Comments from the audience?
12793
12794 --Andrew Church
12795 achurch@achurch.org
12796 http://achurch.org/
12797 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Sat Sep 10 10:30:08 2005
12798 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
12799 Date: Sat Sep 10 10:30:11 2005
12800 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12801 In-Reply-To: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org>
12802 References: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org>
12803 Message-ID: <43231820.6000405@frostycoolslug.com>
12804
12805 Andrew Church wrote:
12806 > Though now that you bring it up, I could see an argument for allowing
12807 > LISTLINKS on a user without PRIVATE set. Comments from the audience?
12808
12809 I say its fine as-is, although i don't think it matters either way.
12810
12811 --
12812 Me
12813
12814 From lordbergee at comcast.net Sat Sep 10 10:53:19 2005
12815 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
12816 Date: Sat Sep 10 10:53:43 2005
12817 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12818 In-Reply-To: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org>
12819 References: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org>
12820 Message-ID: <43231D8F.6030406@comcast.net>
12821
12822 Our network runs with LIST and LISTEMAIL restricted to admins only...
12823 so personally I like LISTLINKS the way that it is. I think you're right
12824 that someone might not want the fact that they go by several nicknames
12825 intentionally exposed.
12826 Although what might be useful is a command to confirm if two nicknames
12827 are linked. If you have a channel registered, you can already do this
12828 in a rather roundabout fashion. Let's say that a user has NicknameA,
12829 NicknameB and NicknameC linked, with the main nickname being NicknameA.
12830 I (as another regular user) want to know if NicknameB and NicknameC are
12831 linked. I can just add NicknameB to my channel's access list at some
12832 level, and then list the access list. ChanServ will then tell me the
12833 access level of NicknameA, so I can see that NicknameA and NicknameB are
12834 linked. And then of course, I can tell ChanServ to remove NicknameC
12835 from the access list (which will of course work, and NicknameA will no
12836 longer appear.) So then I know that those three nicknames are linked
12837 together... if that explanation made any sense at all. :)
12838 I guess after writing that, I feel like maybe it isn't worth trying to
12839 hide nickname links, since there are ways a determined user can find out
12840 anyway...
12841
12842 Bergee
12843
12844 Andrew Church wrote:
12845 >>The main thing that makes me wonder is that LIST and LISTEMAIL aren't
12846 >>restricted to staff, so:
12847 >
12848 > But nicks (nickgroups, technically) also have a PRIVATE option,
12849 > allowing them to select whether their nicks are shown in the list or not.
12850 > Linked nicks all share the same flags, so you can't decide whether to allow
12851 > certain links to be shown or not.
12852 >
12853 > Though now that you bring it up, I could see an argument for allowing
12854 > LISTLINKS on a user without PRIVATE set. Comments from the audience?
12855 >
12856 > --Andrew Church
12857 > achurch@achurch.org
12858 > http://achurch.org/
12859 From omster at gmail.com Sat Sep 10 11:26:08 2005
12860 From: omster at gmail.com (Om)
12861 Date: Sat Sep 10 11:26:16 2005
12862 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12863 In-Reply-To: <43231D8F.6030406@comcast.net>
12864 References: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org> <43231D8F.6030406@comcast.net>
12865 Message-ID: <43232540.8070601@gmail.com>
12866
12867 Bergee wrote:
12868
12869 >I guess after writing that, I feel like maybe it isn't worth trying to
12870 >hide nickname links, since there are ways a determined user can find out
12871 >anyway...
12872 >
12873 >
12874
12875 A determined user can find out if NickA and NickB are linked, but (if
12876 private is set) they still can only find out about JoesSuperSecretNick
12877 by applying above methods to every possible nickname. Allowing /ns
12878 listlinks would let people find JoesSuperSecretNick.
12879
12880 Unless of course /ns listlinks is disabled if private is set, in which
12881 case ignore my entire post! :)
12882
12883 Om
12884 From lordbergee at comcast.net Sat Sep 10 11:45:26 2005
12885 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
12886 Date: Sat Sep 10 11:45:39 2005
12887 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12888 In-Reply-To: <43232540.8070601@gmail.com>
12889 References: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org> <43231D8F.6030406@comcast.net>
12890 <43232540.8070601@gmail.com>
12891 Message-ID: <432329C6.1010204@comcast.net>
12892
12893 Well, sort of... Anyone that knows JoesSuperSecretNick and adds you to
12894 an access list will then know your main nickname. Even if you didn't
12895 care if those people that knew the nickname were aware, I guess I just
12896 meant you'd have to make absolutely sure to never be seen on the
12897 JoesSuperSecretNick nickname by the same people, because they might
12898 notice a similar hostmask and start to wonder... :) If you want a truly
12899 alter ego, maybe you just shouldn't link the nicknames together.
12900 Otherwise you might be left with a false sense of security that no one
12901 can discover that the two are related.
12902
12903 Bergee
12904
12905 Om wrote:
12906 > Bergee wrote:
12907 >>I guess after writing that, I feel like maybe it isn't worth trying to
12908 >>hide nickname links, since there are ways a determined user can find out
12909 >>anyway...
12910 >
12911 > A determined user can find out if NickA and NickB are linked, but (if
12912 > private is set) they still can only find out about JoesSuperSecretNick
12913 > by applying above methods to every possible nickname. Allowing /ns
12914 > listlinks would let people find JoesSuperSecretNick.
12915 >
12916 > Unless of course /ns listlinks is disabled if private is set, in which
12917 > case ignore my entire post! :)
12918 >
12919 > Om
12920 From stratus at blazeirc.net Sat Sep 10 13:13:44 2005
12921 From: stratus at blazeirc.net (Jim Stratus)
12922 Date: Sat Sep 10 13:15:23 2005
12923 Subject: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12924 References: <43230fb6.66515@msgid.achurch.org>
12925 <43231820.6000405@frostycoolslug.com>
12926 Message-ID: <002701c5b644$542ddb90$6fdf7286@noteryan>
12927
12928 Ditto. I really don't think it is necessary for a change but it doesn't
12929 matter too much for me. I would be inclined to think that users may consider
12930 it a privacy issue.
12931
12932 Stratus
12933 BlazeIRC Network
12934 irc.blazeirc.net
12935 ----- Original Message -----
12936 From: "Craig McLure" <Craig@frostycoolslug.com>
12937 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
12938 Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:30 AM
12939 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] NICKSERV suggestion.
12940
12941
12942 > Andrew Church wrote:
12943 >> Though now that you bring it up, I could see an argument for
12944 >> allowing
12945 >> LISTLINKS on a user without PRIVATE set. Comments from the audience?
12946 >
12947 > I say its fine as-is, although i don't think it matters either way.
12948 >
12949 > --
12950 > Me
12951 >
12952 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
12953 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
12954 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
12955
12956 From aragon at phat.za.net Sat Sep 10 14:19:26 2005
12957 From: aragon at phat.za.net (Aragon Gouveia)
12958 Date: Sat Sep 10 14:19:43 2005
12959 Subject: [IRCServices] akick not setting channel ban
12960 Message-ID: <20050910211926.GA50752@phat.za.net>
12961
12962 Hi,
12963
12964 I'm running ircservices 5.0.53 on Unreal 3.2.3. I'm experiencing a strange
12965 problem where chanserv does not set a channel ban for an akicked user. It
12966 does, however, kick the user from the channel. This is a huge problem when
12967 users' clients have auto-rejoin-on-kick enabled.
12968
12969 I'm unable to reproduce the bug. When it happens there is nothing relevant
12970 logged to ircservices.log. It does not happen as the result of the
12971 channel's ban list being full.
12972
12973 This has been a problem for a very long time. I experienced it even in the
12974 days of Unreal 3.2 Beta and ircservices 4.5. It's becoming a bigger problem
12975 now that certain channels have grown to over 100 users. Until now I've
12976 kinda just hoped newer versions would fix it. But that's evidently not the
12977 case...
12978
12979 Is anyone else experiencing this? Anyone know of a fix? Or any suggestions
12980 as to how I can debug it?
12981
12982
12983 Thanks,
12984 Aragon
12985
12986 From mrtoxyc at gmail.com Sat Sep 10 15:59:23 2005
12987 From: mrtoxyc at gmail.com (Toxyc)
12988 Date: Sat Sep 10 15:59:32 2005
12989 Subject: [IRCServices] Config file splitting
12990 Message-ID: <4323654B.9040002@gmail.com>
12991
12992 Hi all
12993
12994 Is it possible to split a config file to more files? Actually I would
12995 like to have an own config file for my own modules, so it's easier to
12996 maintain it. For example an "include anotherfile.conf" directive would
12997 be great.
12998 Is it possible to be implemented in one of the next releases, or not so
12999 good idea?
13000
13001 thanks
13002 Toxyc
13003 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 11 12:20:04 2005
13004 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13005 Date: Sat Sep 10 20:24:43 2005
13006 Subject: [IRCServices] akick not setting channel ban
13007 In-Reply-To: <20050910211926.GA50752@phat.za.net>
13008 Message-ID: <4323a374.66700@msgid.achurch.org>
13009
13010 The only time ChanServ doesn't set a ban is when the same ban already
13011 exists on the channel (as determined by find_ban() in channels.c). It's
13012 possible find_ban() has a bug; next time this issue occurs, save the ban
13013 list from the channel and see if any bans are similar to the ban that
13014 should be added for the user (for an autokick, this is the mask from the
13015 autokill list).
13016
13017 --Andrew Church
13018 achurch@achurch.org
13019 http://achurch.org/
13020
13021 >Hi,
13022 >
13023 >I'm running ircservices 5.0.53 on Unreal 3.2.3. I'm experiencing a strange
13024 >problem where chanserv does not set a channel ban for an akicked user. It
13025 >does, however, kick the user from the channel. This is a huge problem when
13026 >users' clients have auto-rejoin-on-kick enabled.
13027 >
13028 >I'm unable to reproduce the bug. When it happens there is nothing relevant
13029 >logged to ircservices.log. It does not happen as the result of the
13030 >channel's ban list being full.
13031 >
13032 >This has been a problem for a very long time. I experienced it even in the
13033 >days of Unreal 3.2 Beta and ircservices 4.5. It's becoming a bigger problem
13034 >now that certain channels have grown to over 100 users. Until now I've
13035 >kinda just hoped newer versions would fix it. But that's evidently not the
13036 >case...
13037 >
13038 >Is anyone else experiencing this? Anyone know of a fix? Or any suggestions
13039 >as to how I can debug it?
13040 >
13041 >
13042 >Thanks,
13043 >Aragon
13044 >
13045 >------------------------------------------------------------------
13046 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13047 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13048 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 11 12:24:40 2005
13049 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13050 Date: Sat Sep 10 20:27:52 2005
13051 Subject: [IRCServices] Config file splitting
13052 In-Reply-To: <4323654B.9040002@gmail.com>
13053 Message-ID: <4323a41a.66710@msgid.achurch.org>
13054
13055 I'm planning to add support for this in 5.1.
13056
13057 --Andrew Church
13058 achurch@achurch.org
13059 http://achurch.org/
13060
13061 >Hi all
13062 >
13063 >Is it possible to split a config file to more files? Actually I would
13064 >like to have an own config file for my own modules, so it's easier to
13065 >maintain it. For example an "include anotherfile.conf" directive would
13066 >be great.
13067 >Is it possible to be implemented in one of the next releases, or not so
13068 >good idea?
13069 >
13070 >thanks
13071 >Toxyc
13072 >------------------------------------------------------------------
13073 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13074 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13075 From alisor at soronline.net Sun Sep 11 06:03:15 2005
13076 From: alisor at soronline.net (Ali S.)
13077 Date: Sun Sep 11 06:03:26 2005
13078 Subject: [IRCServices] Config file splitting
13079 References: <4323a41a.66710@msgid.achurch.org>
13080 Message-ID: <001001c5b6d1$3195d410$0100000a@citir>
13081
13082 Hello;
13083
13084 Can you give us some info about 5.1 and its release time Andrew?
13085
13086 And do you think of adding Restricted Register to some mail domains at 5.1?
13087
13088 Like;
13089
13090 Mail-except *@ircservices.za.net
13091 Mail-ban *@*
13092
13093 So only users who have mail from ircservices.za.net can register nicks and
13094 channels.
13095
13096 Mail-ban *@lamer.org
13097 Or just ban some mail domains.
13098
13099 Ali S.
13100
13101 ----- Original Message -----
13102 From: "Andrew Church" <achurch@achurch.org>
13103 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
13104 Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 6:24 AM
13105 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Config file splitting
13106
13107
13108 > I'm planning to add support for this in 5.1.
13109 >
13110 > --Andrew Church
13111 > achurch@achurch.org
13112 > http://achurch.org/
13113 >
13114 >>Hi all
13115 >>
13116 >>Is it possible to split a config file to more files? Actually I would
13117 >>like to have an own config file for my own modules, so it's easier to
13118 >>maintain it. For example an "include anotherfile.conf" directive would
13119 >>be great.
13120 >>Is it possible to be implemented in one of the next releases, or not so
13121 >>good idea?
13122 >>
13123 >>thanks
13124 >>Toxyc
13125 >>------------------------------------------------------------------
13126 >>To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13127 >>http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13128 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13129 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13130 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13131
13132 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Sep 11 22:43:24 2005
13133 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13134 Date: Sun Sep 11 06:45:53 2005
13135 Subject: [IRCServices] Config file splitting
13136 In-Reply-To: <001001c5b6d1$3195d410$0100000a@citir>
13137 Message-ID: <43243502.75201@msgid.achurch.org>
13138
13139 >Can you give us some info about 5.1 and its release time Andrew?
13140
13141 Nope, because I don't have any; Services development is entirely
13142 dependent on how much time is left over after my other obligations (like
13143 work). I do hope to get a first alpha out by the end of the year, but no
13144 promises.
13145
13146 >And do you think of adding Restricted Register to some mail domains at 5.1?
13147
13148 I recall the issue having been raised before; I'm not that excited
13149 about adding it, but I'll think about it.
13150
13151 --Andrew Church
13152 achurch@achurch.org
13153 http://achurch.org/
13154 From lordbergee at comcast.net Sun Sep 11 10:57:58 2005
13155 From: lordbergee at comcast.net (Bergee)
13156 Date: Sun Sep 11 10:58:09 2005
13157 Subject: [IRCServices] Config file splitting
13158 In-Reply-To: <43243502.75201@msgid.achurch.org>
13159 References: <43243502.75201@msgid.achurch.org>
13160 Message-ID: <43247026.4060409@comcast.net>
13161
13162 Andrew Church wrote:
13163 >>And do you think of adding Restricted Register to some mail domains at 5.1?
13164 >
13165 >
13166 > I recall the issue having been raised before; I'm not that excited
13167 > about adding it, but I'll think about it.
13168
13169 If you're looking for other people that would find such a feature
13170 useful, I'll add my two cents and say I'd like to see something like
13171 this as well.
13172
13173 Bergee
13174 From aragon at phat.za.net Sun Sep 11 12:17:39 2005
13175 From: aragon at phat.za.net (Aragon Gouveia)
13176 Date: Sun Sep 11 12:17:48 2005
13177 Subject: [IRCServices] akick not setting channel ban
13178 In-Reply-To: <4323a374.66700@msgid.achurch.org>
13179 References: <20050910211926.GA50752@phat.za.net>
13180 <4323a374.66700@msgid.achurch.org>
13181 Message-ID: <20050911191739.GA90884@phat.za.net>
13182
13183 Hi,
13184
13185 Ok it happened again tonight. Here's the info:
13186
13187 AKICK entry:
13188
13189 -ChanServ- 21 *god*!*@* (Please do not bring a religious nick into this
13190 channel, change it and you are welcome back)
13191
13192
13193
13194 Channel banlist at the time:
13195
13196 1. RubberDuck set *!*@72122B08.B384F097.64768427.IP 11/09/2005 4:57pm.
13197 2. RubberDuck set *!*@blabber-2BE7A85F.telkom-ipnet.co.za 11/09/2005 4:46pm.
13198 3. SoulBlade set *!*@40FAA6E6.B384F097.64768427.IP 11/09/2005 4:22pm.
13199 4. ChanServ set hellbo*!*@* on 11/09/2005 3:22pm.
13200 5. estranged.blabber.net set *!*@blabber-9673CB5B.telkom-ipnet.co.za
13201 11/09/2005 2:57pm.
13202 6. BarBot set *!*@blabber-1466766E.telkom-ipnet.co.za 11/09/2005 12:34pm.
13203
13204
13205
13206 [20;00;52] GreeKGoddesS (XALARA@blabber-594011C6.rho.forthnet.gr) has joined.
13207 [20;00;52] * GreeKGoddesS was kicked by ChanServ (AKICK by Arabesque (Please
13208 do not bring a religious nick into this channel, change it and you are
13209 welcome back))
13210
13211 No ban was set.
13212
13213
13214
13215 Thanks,
13216 Aragon
13217
13218
13219 | By Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
13220 | [ 2005-09-11 05:24 +0200 ]
13221 > The only time ChanServ doesn't set a ban is when the same ban already
13222 > exists on the channel (as determined by find_ban() in channels.c). It's
13223 > possible find_ban() has a bug; next time this issue occurs, save the ban
13224 > list from the channel and see if any bans are similar to the ban that
13225 > should be added for the user (for an autokick, this is the mask from the
13226 > autokill list).
13227 >
13228 > --Andrew Church
13229 > achurch@achurch.org
13230 > http://achurch.org/
13231 >
13232 > >Hi,
13233 > >
13234 > >I'm running ircservices 5.0.53 on Unreal 3.2.3. I'm experiencing a strange
13235 > >problem where chanserv does not set a channel ban for an akicked user. It
13236 > >does, however, kick the user from the channel. This is a huge problem when
13237 > >users' clients have auto-rejoin-on-kick enabled.
13238 > >
13239 > >I'm unable to reproduce the bug. When it happens there is nothing relevant
13240 > >logged to ircservices.log. It does not happen as the result of the
13241 > >channel's ban list being full.
13242 > >
13243 > >This has been a problem for a very long time. I experienced it even in the
13244 > >days of Unreal 3.2 Beta and ircservices 4.5. It's becoming a bigger problem
13245 > >now that certain channels have grown to over 100 users. Until now I've
13246 > >kinda just hoped newer versions would fix it. But that's evidently not the
13247 > >case...
13248 > >
13249 > >Is anyone else experiencing this? Anyone know of a fix? Or any suggestions
13250 > >as to how I can debug it?
13251 > >
13252 > >
13253 > >Thanks,
13254 > >Aragon
13255 > >
13256 > >------------------------------------------------------------------
13257 > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13258 > >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13259 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13260 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13261 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13262 From aragon at phat.za.net Sun Sep 11 12:26:33 2005
13263 From: aragon at phat.za.net (Aragon Gouveia)
13264 Date: Sun Sep 11 12:26:42 2005
13265 Subject: [IRCServices] akick not setting channel ban
13266 In-Reply-To: <20050911191739.GA90884@phat.za.net>
13267 References: <20050910211926.GA50752@phat.za.net>
13268 <4323a374.66700@msgid.achurch.org>
13269 <20050911191739.GA90884@phat.za.net>
13270 Message-ID: <20050911192633.GB90884@phat.za.net>
13271
13272 I've just done some experimenting now. I cleared all the bans in the
13273 channel. It made no difference. I restarted services and that fixed this
13274 particular incident.
13275
13276 Maybe an uncleared variable floating around somewhere?
13277
13278
13279 | By Aragon Gouveia <aragon@phat.za.net>
13280 | [ 2005-09-11 21:17 +0200 ]
13281 > Hi,
13282 >
13283 > Ok it happened again tonight. Here's the info:
13284 >
13285 > AKICK entry:
13286 >
13287 > -ChanServ- 21 *god*!*@* (Please do not bring a religious nick into this
13288 > channel, change it and you are welcome back)
13289 >
13290 >
13291 >
13292 > Channel banlist at the time:
13293 >
13294 > 1. RubberDuck set *!*@72122B08.B384F097.64768427.IP 11/09/2005 4:57pm.
13295 > 2. RubberDuck set *!*@blabber-2BE7A85F.telkom-ipnet.co.za 11/09/2005 4:46pm.
13296 > 3. SoulBlade set *!*@40FAA6E6.B384F097.64768427.IP 11/09/2005 4:22pm.
13297 > 4. ChanServ set hellbo*!*@* on 11/09/2005 3:22pm.
13298 > 5. estranged.blabber.net set *!*@blabber-9673CB5B.telkom-ipnet.co.za
13299 > 11/09/2005 2:57pm.
13300 > 6. BarBot set *!*@blabber-1466766E.telkom-ipnet.co.za 11/09/2005 12:34pm.
13301 >
13302 >
13303 >
13304 > [20;00;52] GreeKGoddesS (XALARA@blabber-594011C6.rho.forthnet.gr) has joined.
13305 > [20;00;52] * GreeKGoddesS was kicked by ChanServ (AKICK by Arabesque (Please
13306 > do not bring a religious nick into this channel, change it and you are
13307 > welcome back))
13308 >
13309 > No ban was set.
13310 >
13311 >
13312 >
13313 > Thanks,
13314 > Aragon
13315 >
13316 >
13317 > | By Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
13318 > | [ 2005-09-11 05:24 +0200 ]
13319 > > The only time ChanServ doesn't set a ban is when the same ban already
13320 > > exists on the channel (as determined by find_ban() in channels.c). It's
13321 > > possible find_ban() has a bug; next time this issue occurs, save the ban
13322 > > list from the channel and see if any bans are similar to the ban that
13323 > > should be added for the user (for an autokick, this is the mask from the
13324 > > autokill list).
13325 > >
13326 > > --Andrew Church
13327 > > achurch@achurch.org
13328 > > http://achurch.org/
13329 > >
13330 > > >Hi,
13331 > > >
13332 > > >I'm running ircservices 5.0.53 on Unreal 3.2.3. I'm experiencing a strange
13333 > > >problem where chanserv does not set a channel ban for an akicked user. It
13334 > > >does, however, kick the user from the channel. This is a huge problem when
13335 > > >users' clients have auto-rejoin-on-kick enabled.
13336 > > >
13337 > > >I'm unable to reproduce the bug. When it happens there is nothing relevant
13338 > > >logged to ircservices.log. It does not happen as the result of the
13339 > > >channel's ban list being full.
13340 > > >
13341 > > >This has been a problem for a very long time. I experienced it even in the
13342 > > >days of Unreal 3.2 Beta and ircservices 4.5. It's becoming a bigger problem
13343 > > >now that certain channels have grown to over 100 users. Until now I've
13344 > > >kinda just hoped newer versions would fix it. But that's evidently not the
13345 > > >case...
13346 > > >
13347 > > >Is anyone else experiencing this? Anyone know of a fix? Or any suggestions
13348 > > >as to how I can debug it?
13349 > > >
13350 > > >
13351 > > >Thanks,
13352 > > >Aragon
13353 > > >
13354 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
13355 > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13356 > > >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13357 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13358 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13359 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13360 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13361 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13362 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13363 From xxx.coder at gmail.com Sun Sep 11 14:44:47 2005
13364 From: xxx.coder at gmail.com (ongeboren)
13365 Date: Sun Sep 11 14:44:59 2005
13366 Subject: [IRCServices] akick not setting channel ban
13367 In-Reply-To: <20050911192633.GB90884@phat.za.net>
13368 References: <20050910211926.GA50752@phat.za.net>
13369 <4323a374.66700@msgid.achurch.org>
13370 <20050911191739.GA90884@phat.za.net>
13371 <20050911192633.GB90884@phat.za.net>
13372 Message-ID: <ce6d53600509111444a3684ab@mail.gmail.com>
13373
13374 I suspect that some of the irc servers in the network drop a ban
13375 silently, resulting in services having this ban on their list, which
13376 is desynched from the rest of the network in this case. I've seen
13377 similar situations with old hybrid servers and other services, but who
13378 knows..
13379
13380 On 9/11/05, Aragon Gouveia <aragon@phat.za.net> wrote:
13381 > I've just done some experimenting now. I cleared all the bans in the
13382 > channel. It made no difference. I restarted services and that fixed this
13383 > particular incident.
13384 >
13385 > Maybe an uncleared variable floating around somewhere?
13386 >
13387 >
13388 > | By Aragon Gouveia <aragon@phat.za.net>
13389 > | [ 2005-09-11 21:17 +0200 ]
13390 > > Hi,
13391 > >
13392 > > Ok it happened again tonight. Here's the info:
13393 > >
13394 > > AKICK entry:
13395 > >
13396 > > -ChanServ- 21 *god*!*@* (Please do not bring a religious nick into this
13397 > > channel, change it and you are welcome back)
13398 > >
13399 > >
13400 > >
13401 > > Channel banlist at the time:
13402 > >
13403 > > 1. RubberDuck set *!*@72122B08.B384F097.64768427.IP 11/09/2005 4:57pm.
13404 > > 2. RubberDuck set *!*@blabber-2BE7A85F.telkom-ipnet.co.za 11/09/2005 4:46pm.
13405 > > 3. SoulBlade set *!*@40FAA6E6.B384F097.64768427.IP 11/09/2005 4:22pm.
13406 > > 4. ChanServ set hellbo*!*@* on 11/09/2005 3:22pm.
13407 > > 5. estranged.blabber.net set *!*@blabber-9673CB5B.telkom-ipnet.co.za
13408 > > 11/09/2005 2:57pm.
13409 > > 6. BarBot set *!*@blabber-1466766E.telkom-ipnet.co.za 11/09/2005 12:34pm.
13410 > >
13411 > >
13412 > >
13413 > > [20;00;52] GreeKGoddesS (XALARA@blabber-594011C6.rho.forthnet.gr) has joined.
13414 > > [20;00;52] * GreeKGoddesS was kicked by ChanServ (AKICK by Arabesque (Please
13415 > > do not bring a religious nick into this channel, change it and you are
13416 > > welcome back))
13417 > >
13418 > > No ban was set.
13419 > >
13420 > >
13421 > >
13422 > > Thanks,
13423 > > Aragon
13424 > >
13425 > >
13426 > > | By Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
13427 > > | [ 2005-09-11 05:24 +0200 ]
13428 > > > The only time ChanServ doesn't set a ban is when the same ban already
13429 > > > exists on the channel (as determined by find_ban() in channels.c). It's
13430 > > > possible find_ban() has a bug; next time this issue occurs, save the ban
13431 > > > list from the channel and see if any bans are similar to the ban that
13432 > > > should be added for the user (for an autokick, this is the mask from the
13433 > > > autokill list).
13434 > > >
13435 > > > --Andrew Church
13436 > > > achurch@achurch.org
13437 > > > http://achurch.org/
13438 > > >
13439 > > > >Hi,
13440 > > > >
13441 > > > >I'm running ircservices 5.0.53 on Unreal 3.2.3. I'm experiencing a strange
13442 > > > >problem where chanserv does not set a channel ban for an akicked user. It
13443 > > > >does, however, kick the user from the channel. This is a huge problem when
13444 > > > >users' clients have auto-rejoin-on-kick enabled.
13445 > > > >
13446 > > > >I'm unable to reproduce the bug. When it happens there is nothing relevant
13447 > > > >logged to ircservices.log. It does not happen as the result of the
13448 > > > >channel's ban list being full.
13449 > > > >
13450 > > > >This has been a problem for a very long time. I experienced it even in the
13451 > > > >days of Unreal 3.2 Beta and ircservices 4.5. It's becoming a bigger problem
13452 > > > >now that certain channels have grown to over 100 users. Until now I've
13453 > > > >kinda just hoped newer versions would fix it. But that's evidently not the
13454 > > > >case...
13455 > > > >
13456 > > > >Is anyone else experiencing this? Anyone know of a fix? Or any suggestions
13457 > > > >as to how I can debug it?
13458 > > > >
13459 > > > >
13460 > > > >Thanks,
13461 > > > >Aragon
13462 > > > >
13463 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
13464 > > > >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13465 > > > >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13466 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13467 > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13468 > > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13469 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13470 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13471 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13472 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13473 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13474 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13475 >
13476
13477
13478 --
13479 Evlogi Petrov - ongeboren@UniBG
13480 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Sep 12 11:51:18 2005
13481 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13482 Date: Sun Sep 11 20:02:07 2005
13483 Subject: [IRCServices] akick not setting channel ban
13484 In-Reply-To: <ce6d53600509111444a3684ab@mail.gmail.com>
13485 Message-ID: <4324efa5.16566@msgid.achurch.org>
13486
13487 >I suspect that some of the irc servers in the network drop a ban
13488 >silently, resulting in services having this ban on their list, which
13489 >is desynched from the rest of the network in this case. I've seen
13490 >similar situations with old hybrid servers and other services, but who
13491 >knows..
13492
13493 That's an interesting possibility. To the original poster: try
13494 applying the following patch to Services, then recompiling and restarting
13495 in debug mode (ircservices -debug). When you see the bug happening, check
13496 the logfile and see if the ban in question is listed. (Also, if you could
13497 privately send me the full debug logfile for further analysis I'd
13498 appreciate it.)
13499
13500 --Andrew Church
13501 achurch@achurch.org
13502 http://achurch.org/
13503
13504 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13505
13506 Index: channels.c
13507 ===================================================================
13508 RCS file: /var/local/cvsroot/ircservices/channels.c,v
13509 retrieving revision 2.43.2.1
13510 diff -u -r2.43.2.1 channels.c
13511 --- channels.c 6 Jan 2005 17:15:11 -0000 2.43.2.1
13512 +++ channels.c 12 Sep 2005 03:01:04 -0000
13513 @@ -192,22 +192,33 @@
13514
13515 t = strchr(ban, '!');
13516 i = 0;
13517 + if (debug)
13518 + log("find_ban([%s],[%s])", chan->name, ban);
13519 ARRAY_FOREACH (i, chan->bans) {
13520 + if (debug)
13521 + log("... checking [%s]", chan->bans[i]);
13522 s = strchr(chan->bans[i], '!');
13523 if (s && t) {
13524 if (s-(chan->bans[i]) == t-ban
13525 && irc_strnicmp(chan->bans[i], ban, s-(chan->bans[i])) == 0
13526 && stricmp(s+1, t+1) == 0
13527 ) {
13528 + if (debug)
13529 + log("... found!");
13530 return i;
13531 }
13532 } else if (!s && !t) {
13533 /* Bans without '!' should be impossible; just
13534 * do a case-insensitive compare */
13535 - if (stricmp(chan->bans[i], ban) == 0)
13536 + if (stricmp(chan->bans[i], ban) == 0) {
13537 + if (debug)
13538 + log("... found!");
13539 return i;
13540 + }
13541 }
13542 }
13543 + if (debug)
13544 + log("... NOT found");
13545 return -1;
13546 }
13547
13548 From aragon at phat.za.net Mon Sep 12 14:21:05 2005
13549 From: aragon at phat.za.net (Aragon Gouveia)
13550 Date: Mon Sep 12 14:21:23 2005
13551 Subject: [IRCServices] akick not setting channel ban
13552 In-Reply-To: <4324efa5.16566@msgid.achurch.org>
13553 References: <ce6d53600509111444a3684ab@mail.gmail.com>
13554 <4324efa5.16566@msgid.achurch.org>
13555 Message-ID: <20050912212105.GA47357@phat.za.net>
13556
13557 Agreed it could be a network desync. Thanks for the patch. Will apply it
13558 and let you know the results.
13559
13560
13561
13562 | By Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
13563 | [ 2005-09-12 05:02 +0200 ]
13564 > >I suspect that some of the irc servers in the network drop a ban
13565 > >silently, resulting in services having this ban on their list, which
13566 > >is desynched from the rest of the network in this case. I've seen
13567 > >similar situations with old hybrid servers and other services, but who
13568 > >knows..
13569 >
13570 > That's an interesting possibility. To the original poster: try
13571 > applying the following patch to Services, then recompiling and restarting
13572 > in debug mode (ircservices -debug). When you see the bug happening, check
13573 > the logfile and see if the ban in question is listed. (Also, if you could
13574 > privately send me the full debug logfile for further analysis I'd
13575 > appreciate it.)
13576 >
13577 > --Andrew Church
13578 > achurch@achurch.org
13579 > http://achurch.org/
13580 >
13581 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13582 >
13583 > Index: channels.c
13584 > ===================================================================
13585 > RCS file: /var/local/cvsroot/ircservices/channels.c,v
13586 > retrieving revision 2.43.2.1
13587 > diff -u -r2.43.2.1 channels.c
13588 > --- channels.c 6 Jan 2005 17:15:11 -0000 2.43.2.1
13589 > +++ channels.c 12 Sep 2005 03:01:04 -0000
13590 > @@ -192,22 +192,33 @@
13591 >
13592 > t = strchr(ban, '!');
13593 > i = 0;
13594 > + if (debug)
13595 > + log("find_ban([%s],[%s])", chan->name, ban);
13596 > ARRAY_FOREACH (i, chan->bans) {
13597 > + if (debug)
13598 > + log("... checking [%s]", chan->bans[i]);
13599 > s = strchr(chan->bans[i], '!');
13600 > if (s && t) {
13601 > if (s-(chan->bans[i]) == t-ban
13602 > && irc_strnicmp(chan->bans[i], ban, s-(chan->bans[i])) == 0
13603 > && stricmp(s+1, t+1) == 0
13604 > ) {
13605 > + if (debug)
13606 > + log("... found!");
13607 > return i;
13608 > }
13609 > } else if (!s && !t) {
13610 > /* Bans without '!' should be impossible; just
13611 > * do a case-insensitive compare */
13612 > - if (stricmp(chan->bans[i], ban) == 0)
13613 > + if (stricmp(chan->bans[i], ban) == 0) {
13614 > + if (debug)
13615 > + log("... found!");
13616 > return i;
13617 > + }
13618 > }
13619 > }
13620 > + if (debug)
13621 > + log("... NOT found");
13622 > return -1;
13623 > }
13624 >
13625 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13626 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13627 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13628 From red_alert at the-psychiatry.ch Mon Sep 19 18:22:03 2005
13629 From: red_alert at the-psychiatry.ch (Sandro "red_alert" Mathys)
13630 Date: Mon Sep 19 18:22:13 2005
13631 Subject: [IRCServices] LDAP (authenticate)
13632 Message-ID: <432F643B.7000602@the-psychiatry.ch>
13633
13634 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
13635 Hash: SHA1
13636
13637 Hi all
13638
13639 I just downloaded and installed ircservices and they're great :D
13640
13641 to my question: does anyone have/know about a module to force every
13642 connecting user against a ldap-server?
13643
13644 regards
13645 red_alert
13646 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
13647 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
13648 Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
13649
13650 iD8DBQFDL2Q615WDu3BSpcIRAgXAAJ9luWCk7BhqpqH2ECmBwZMYpU4ftgCfVYzf
13651 17zeC0fYLAUPZsNbJ4Bo5nA=
13652 =g2MO
13653 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13654 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Mon Sep 19 19:41:51 2005
13655 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
13656 Date: Mon Sep 19 19:42:08 2005
13657 Subject: [IRCServices] LDAP (authenticate)
13658 In-Reply-To: <432F643B.7000602@the-psychiatry.ch>
13659 References: <432F643B.7000602@the-psychiatry.ch>
13660 Message-ID: <432F76EF.50906@gmail.com>
13661
13662 Not that I'm aware of, nope.
13663
13664 Sandro "red_alert" Mathys wrote:
13665 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
13666 > Hash: SHA1
13667 >
13668 > Hi all
13669 >
13670 > I just downloaded and installed ircservices and they're great :D
13671 >
13672 > to my question: does anyone have/know about a module to force every
13673 > connecting user against a ldap-server?
13674 >
13675 > regards
13676 > red_alert
13677 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
13678 > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
13679 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
13680 >
13681 > iD8DBQFDL2Q615WDu3BSpcIRAgXAAJ9luWCk7BhqpqH2ECmBwZMYpU4ftgCfVYzf
13682 > 17zeC0fYLAUPZsNbJ4Bo5nA=
13683 > =g2MO
13684 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13685 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
13686 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13687 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13688 >
13689
13690 From diavolgr at hotmail.com Sun Sep 25 18:58:38 2005
13691 From: diavolgr at hotmail.com (diavolosss salalakis)
13692 Date: Sun Sep 25 18:58:51 2005
13693 Subject: [IRCServices] Strange message with TS
13694 Message-ID: <BAY24-F248E54A35E4BF22E5AA2E1C38B0@phx.gbl>
13695
13696 Hello ppl, I'm using bahamut ircd (1.8.3) with ircservices 5.0.54 and i get
13697 a strange message:
13698 When someone join a registered channel and he is the only one at that
13699 channel I get the following message:
13700
13701 [04:54:32] -some.server.com:#channel- *** Notice -- TS for #channel changed
13702 from 1127692469 to 1127683314
13703 [04:54:32] * services.server.com sets mode: -o dem
13704 [04:54:32] * services.server.com sets mode: +o dem
13705 [04:54:32] * ChanServ sets mode: +ntr-o dem
13706
13707 and in wallops:
13708
13709 -some.server.com- *** Notice -- Server services.server.com setting +o and
13710 blasting TS on #channel
13711
13712 Services shouldn't give op to dem while he has not access on that channel
13713 and he is not an oper (even if chanserv removes it right after)
13714
13715 I'm not sure if this is normal or not that's why i'm sending this
13716 thanks
13717
13718 _________________________________________________________________
13719 Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
13720 http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
13721
13722 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Sep 26 11:46:40 2005
13723 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13724 Date: Sun Sep 25 19:55:18 2005
13725 Subject: [IRCServices] Strange message with TS
13726 In-Reply-To: <BAY24-F248E54A35E4BF22E5AA2E1C38B0@phx.gbl>
13727 Message-ID: <4337630d.70531@msgid.achurch.org>
13728
13729 The -o/+o and TS change is a result of enabling the CSSetChannelTime
13730 option in your configuration file (modules.conf). The -o/+o, in
13731 particular, is not generated directly by Services, but is an artifact of
13732 the way your IRC server handles the TS update: the user already has ops
13733 from being the first user in the channel, but when Services sends a TS
13734 change, your IRC server blindly clears all modes (including ops) from the
13735 channel before noticing that Services didn't actually request the user's
13736 ops to be cleared, and then sends out a +o to correct its mistake. So
13737 technically, this is a bug (or at least an annoyance) in your IRC server.
13738
13739 Thus, the -o/+o is harmless, but if it bothers you, disable
13740 CSSetChannelTime in modules.conf.
13741
13742 This information has been added to the manual and the FAQ for the next
13743 release.
13744
13745 --Andrew Church
13746 achurch@achurch.org
13747 http://achurch.org/
13748
13749 >Hello ppl, I'm using bahamut ircd (1.8.3) with ircservices 5.0.54 and i get
13750 >a strange message:
13751 >When someone join a registered channel and he is the only one at that
13752 >channel I get the following message:
13753 >
13754 >[04:54:32] -some.server.com:#channel- *** Notice -- TS for #channel changed
13755 >from 1127692469 to 1127683314
13756 >[04:54:32] * services.server.com sets mode: -o dem
13757 >[04:54:32] * services.server.com sets mode: +o dem
13758 >[04:54:32] * ChanServ sets mode: +ntr-o dem
13759 >
13760 >and in wallops:
13761 >
13762 >-some.server.com- *** Notice -- Server services.server.com setting +o and
13763 >blasting TS on #channel
13764 >
13765 >Services shouldn't give op to dem while he has not access on that channel
13766 >and he is not an oper (even if chanserv removes it right after)
13767 >
13768 >I'm not sure if this is normal or not that's why i'm sending this
13769 >thanks
13770 >
13771 >_________________________________________________________________
13772 >Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
13773 >http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
13774 >
13775 >------------------------------------------------------------------
13776 >To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
13777 >http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
13778 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Sep 26 12:58:36 2005
13779 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13780 Date: Sun Sep 25 21:03:35 2005
13781 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.55 released
13782 Message-ID: <4337730e.66564@msgid.achurch.org>
13783
13784 Services 5.0.55 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
13785
13786 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
13787 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
13788
13789 b31dec0ffb651d1e674c66d15f606023 ircservices-5.0.55.tar.gz
13790 08faadb99061b7ba8b9eb49eb5bb75ca ircservices-5.0.55.diff.gz
13791 9247128f691cfa7c85d2fc093a4b6b4d ircservices-5.0.55-1.i386.rpm
13792 a2cefe0e5fd978b8e4cf404280b0d549 ircservices_5.0.55-1_i386.deb
13793
13794 The mirrors should have it shortly.
13795
13796 This is a maintenance release to address a couple of minor issues
13797 (the "rare bug" with regard to voice status is the case where a +o user
13798 sends a -o+hv for himself and Services doesn't cancel the -v, and has no
13799 implications for ordinary use). Upgrade at your leisure.
13800
13801 Changes in version 5.0.55
13802 -------------------------
13803 2005/09/26 Added documentation on CSSetChannelTime configuration option.
13804 2005/08/25 Fixed rare bug allowing users to gain voice status
13805 improperly. Reported by Anton Wolkov <phan70m@gmail.com>
13806 2005/08/23 Added "authed" callback for newly-authorized nicknames.
13807 Suggested by Robin Burchell <surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
13808
13809 --Andrew Church
13810 achurch@achurch.org
13811 http://achurch.org/
13812 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Sep 26 14:08:37 2005
13813 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13814 Date: Sun Sep 25 22:11:19 2005
13815 Subject: [IRCServices] Feature request: services ignore / flag command /
13816 triggers
13817 In-Reply-To: <20050717075502.0AF4AC0FB32@sakura.ian-justman.com>
13818 Message-ID: <433782eb.16374@msgid.achurch.org>
13819
13820 >*] SERVICES IGNORE:
13821
13822 I'm looking into improving the ignore system for 5.1. I may or may
13823 not add manual ignore commands, but you can always /kill troublemakers.
13824
13825 >*] FLAG COMMAND
13826
13827 I've always held that this sort of thing should be taken care of
13828 outside of Services, so I don't plan to add such a command.
13829
13830 >*] SPECIFIC TRIGGERS:
13831
13832 It's my intention that auto-ignore should take care of problems like
13833 this; I don't like the complexity that manually-settable triggers on
13834 individual commands would add.
13835
13836 --Andrew Church
13837 achurch@achurch.org
13838 http://achurch.org/
13839 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Mon Sep 26 03:59:48 2005
13840 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
13841 Date: Mon Sep 26 04:00:04 2005
13842 Subject: [IRCServices] Strange message with TS
13843 In-Reply-To: <4337630d.70531@msgid.achurch.org>
13844 References: <4337630d.70531@msgid.achurch.org>
13845 Message-ID: <4337D4A4.8070003@gmail.com>
13846
13847 This may (or may not) be a related issue, and I only remember seeing it
13848 when I was back playing with 5.0.29, but still thought I'd mention it.
13849
13850 Services synched to my testnet, I was in a registered channel, I was set
13851 -o+o by Services' server, which is all fine and good, eh, I can't
13852 exactly remember what happened (got a log of it someplace) but
13853 basically, I ended up with ops. I was a registered nick, but not identified.
13854
13855 Is this an issue that has been fixed/whatever? If not, let me know and
13856 I'll go dig up that log I meant to send to this list like, around the
13857 time of 5.0.29.. :p
13858
13859 Andrew Church wrote:
13860 > The -o/+o and TS change is a result of enabling the CSSetChannelTime
13861 > option in your configuration file (modules.conf). The -o/+o, in
13862 > particular, is not generated directly by Services, but is an artifact of
13863 > the way your IRC server handles the TS update: the user already has ops
13864 > from being the first user in the channel, but when Services sends a TS
13865 > change, your IRC server blindly clears all modes (including ops) from the
13866 > channel before noticing that Services didn't actually request the user's
13867 > ops to be cleared, and then sends out a +o to correct its mistake. So
13868 > technically, this is a bug (or at least an annoyance) in your IRC server.
13869 >
13870 > Thus, the -o/+o is harmless, but if it bothers you, disable
13871 > CSSetChannelTime in modules.conf.
13872 >
13873 > This information has been added to the manual and the FAQ for the next
13874 > release.
13875 >
13876 > --Andrew Church
13877 > achurch@achurch.org
13878 > http://achurch.org/
13879 >
13880 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Mon Sep 26 04:46:33 2005
13881 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
13882 Date: Mon Sep 26 04:46:52 2005
13883 Subject: [IRCServices] Small website issue.
13884 Message-ID: <4337DF99.5020903@gmail.com>
13885
13886 Hi,
13887
13888 Went to download the diff for 5.0.55 for my testnet, went to
13889 http://www.ircservices.esper.net/download.html and noticed that one of
13890 the download links still points to .za.net, which naturally, doesn't work.
13891
13892 Just thought I'd give you guys a heads up :)
13893
13894 Ta,
13895 w00t.
13896 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Sep 26 20:49:46 2005
13897 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13898 Date: Mon Sep 26 04:50:02 2005
13899 Subject: [IRCServices] Small website issue.
13900 In-Reply-To: <4337DF99.5020903@gmail.com>
13901 Message-ID: <4337e063.45274@msgid.achurch.org>
13902
13903 >Went to download the diff for 5.0.55 for my testnet, went to
13904 >http://www.ircservices.esper.net/download.html and noticed that one of
13905 >the download links still points to .za.net, which naturally, doesn't work.
13906
13907 Oops, silly mistake... fixed, thanks.
13908
13909 --Andrew Church
13910 achurch@achurch.org
13911 http://achurch.org/
13912 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Sep 26 20:50:34 2005
13913 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
13914 Date: Mon Sep 26 04:52:37 2005
13915 Subject: [IRCServices] Strange message with TS
13916 In-Reply-To: <4337D4A4.8070003@gmail.com>
13917 Message-ID: <4337e0fe.46732@msgid.achurch.org>
13918
13919 >This may (or may not) be a related issue, and I only remember seeing it
13920 >when I was back playing with 5.0.29, but still thought I'd mention it.
13921 >
13922 >Services synched to my testnet, I was in a registered channel, I was set
13923 >-o+o by Services' server, which is all fine and good, eh, I can't
13924 >exactly remember what happened (got a log of it someplace) but
13925 >basically, I ended up with ops. I was a registered nick, but not identified.
13926
13927 Since you got a -o, I assume you had +o in the first place, so this
13928 isn't a problem. It's almost certainly the same cause--the only time (IIRC)
13929 Services sends out mode changes as the server is when it's setting channel
13930 TS, and even then it's not really a mode change, it's an SJOIN with the
13931 current channel modes.
13932
13933 --Andrew Church
13934 achurch@achurch.org
13935 http://achurch.org/
13936 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Mon Sep 26 04:58:25 2005
13937 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
13938 Date: Mon Sep 26 04:58:40 2005
13939 Subject: [IRCServices] Strange message with TS
13940 In-Reply-To: <4337e0fe.46732@msgid.achurch.org>
13941 References: <4337e0fe.46732@msgid.achurch.org>
13942 Message-ID: <4337E261.6010004@gmail.com>
13943
13944 Andrew Church wrote:
13945 > Since you got a -o, I assume you had +o in the first place, so this
13946 > isn't a problem. It's almost certainly the same cause--the only time (IIRC)
13947 > Services sends out mode changes as the server is when it's setting channel
13948 > TS, and even then it's not really a mode change, it's an SJOIN with the
13949 > current channel modes.
13950
13951 That as may be, but the issue that worried me was that I got to keep the
13952 ops in that channel-- I was still opped after Services started fiddling.
13953 Minor, but still. I'll try find the log when I get offline (and back to
13954 my normal machine) and send it over tomorrow.
13955
13956 As an aside, I remember that when I then cycled the channel, +o was
13957 removed properly.
13958 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Mon Sep 26 20:44:46 2005
13959 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
13960 Date: Mon Sep 26 20:45:04 2005
13961 Subject: [IRCServices] Strange message with TS
13962 In-Reply-To: <4337e0fe.46732@msgid.achurch.org>
13963 References: <4337e0fe.46732@msgid.achurch.org>
13964 Message-ID: <4338C02E.50400@gmail.com>
13965
13966 Andrew Church wrote:
13967 Belay that, I can't find the logfile, so I guess there's not much point
13968 persuing it for now. I'll try reproduce, but don't hold your breath :)
13969
13970 Thanks for the auth callback in .55 by the way, seems to work like a
13971 charm - once I remembered to hook into nickserv/mail-auth rather than
13972 nickserv/main.. :p
13973 From webmaster at e-divx.at Fri Oct 7 04:41:42 2005
13974 From: webmaster at e-divx.at (webmaster@e-divx.at)
13975 Date: Fri Oct 7 04:42:11 2005
13976 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with IRCservices connection to UnrealIRCD
13977 Message-ID: <200510071141.j97Bfg2C023143@nitweb3.nit.at>
13978
13979 Hey!
13980
13981 I've used bahamut as IRC server before, which worked fine with the ircservices. Now I will use UnrealIRCD instead of bahamut. I've configured UnrealIRCD and made some changes in the ircservices-config.
13982 The problem is, that ircservices can't connect to UnrealIRCD and I've absolutly no idea what the problem is.
13983 I got the following messages in ircservices.log:
13984 ---
13985 [Oct 06 12:44:03.099500 2005] Initiated connection to 127.0.0.1:6667
13986 [Oct 06 12:44:03.099881 2005] debug: Sent: PROTOCTL SJOIN SJOIN2 SJ3 NICKv2 VHP VL NOQUIT UMODE2 TOKEN NICKIP
13987 [Oct 06 12:44:03.099985 2005] debug: Sent: PASS :xxxxx
13988 [Oct 06 12:44:03.100097 2005] debug: Sent: SERVER at-vie01a-mirror02.chello.at 1 :U0-*-2 Services for IRC Networks
13989 [Oct 06 12:44:40.299812 2005] FATAL: Remote server returned: ERROR :Closing Link: [127.0.0.1] (Ping timeout)
13990 ---
13991
13992 ircservices and UnrealIRCD run on the same machine and ircservices should connect to port 6667.
13993
13994 I'm using the newest version of UnrealIRCD and ircservices.
13995
13996 w00t, from the UnrealIRCD.com forums told me that there's maybe a rather obscure option in the ircservices config which I have to enable and I should post to this mailing list. So I hope that you guys can help me, please.
13997
13998
13999 thx, scrat
14000 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Fri Oct 7 05:54:32 2005
14001 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
14002 Date: Fri Oct 7 05:54:58 2005
14003 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with IRCservices connection to UnrealIRCD
14004 In-Reply-To: <200510071141.j97Bfg2C023143@nitweb3.nit.at>
14005 References: <200510071141.j97Bfg2C023143@nitweb3.nit.at>
14006 Message-ID: <43467008.7080106@gmail.com>
14007
14008 webmaster@e-divx.at wrote:
14009 > w00t, from the UnrealIRCD.com forums told me that there's maybe a rather obscure option in the ircservices config which I have to enable and I should post to this mailing list. So I hope that you guys can help me, please.
14010 Yeah, I'm not 100% sure on this - but I seem to remember somebody else
14011 having the same problem, and finding there was an option related to
14012 pings or something?
14013
14014 With exams next week, I've not really had much 'extra' time to do
14015 digging through conf files without much reason, so sorry if I'm stepping
14016 on anyone's toes.
14017
14018 Andy, if I'm right on this, it might be an idea to FAQ-erize it, as I've
14019 seen a few people stuck with similar errors to this now.
14020 From admin at epicirc.net Sat Oct 8 10:46:15 2005
14021 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
14022 Date: Sat Oct 8 10:47:01 2005
14023 Subject: [IRCServices] Mlock problem.
14024 Message-ID: <20051008174644.BEC8FE907B8@sakura.ian-justman.com>
14025
14026 Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
14027 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
14028 Name: smime.p7s
14029 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
14030 Size: 3049 bytes
14031 Desc: not available
14032 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20051008/08ae67c3/smime.bin
14033 From vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr Sat Oct 8 14:38:16 2005
14034 From: vonitsa_net at yahoo.gr (Dionisios K.)
14035 Date: Sat Oct 8 14:38:27 2005
14036 Subject: [IRCServices] Mlock problem.
14037 Message-ID: <20051008213816.92610.qmail@web31413.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
14038
14039 Have u tried to restart services? I had the same
14040 problem before. Restart services and normally it will
14041 be fixed. mabie its just a desync.
14042 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
14043 <admin@epicirc.net> wrote:
14044 > I have a question for one of my channels they have
14045 tried to enable Mlock and
14046 > have been unable to get it to work. It shows that
14047 its set, but doesn't
14048 > work.
14049 >
14050 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Information for channel #xxxx:
14051 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Founder: XXXXXXXX
14052 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Description: Description.
14053 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Registered: Feb 21 17:16:59
14054 2005
14055 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Last used: Oct 08 12:38:12 2005
14056 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Options: Topic Retention,
14057 Private, Secure Ops, Secure,
14058 > Enforce
14059 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Mode lock: +mnstl
14060 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- For more information, type:
14061 /msg ChanServ INFO #xxxx
14062 > ALL
14063 >
14064 > Works fine for other channels on the network but not
14065 for this one.
14066 >
14067 > Here is an example of what happens when a normal op
14068 changes modes:
14069 >
14070 > [12:45pm] me sets mode: +pi-smnt
14071 > [12:45pm] me sets mode: -l+k sdsds
14072 >
14073 > Chanserv never undos this change.
14074 >
14075 > Thanks for the help,
14076 >
14077 > XanaX
14078 > EpicIRC Sr. Network Admin.
14079 > ------------
14080 >
14081 ------------------------------------------------------------------
14082 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
14083 visit:
14084 >
14085 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14086
14087
14088 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
14089 From admin at epicirc.net Sat Oct 8 15:03:54 2005
14090 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
14091 Date: Sat Oct 8 15:04:12 2005
14092 Subject: [IRCServices] Mlock problem.
14093 In-Reply-To: <20051008213816.92610.qmail@web31413.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
14094 Message-ID: <20051008220409.C3BBEE907D2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
14095
14096 Hm no I havent tried that. It works fine in other channels. I hate to
14097 restart services though, but I guess its worth a shot. Ill get back to you.
14098
14099
14100 -----Original Message-----
14101 From: Dionisios K. [mailto:vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr]
14102 Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 4:38 PM
14103 To: admin@epicirc.net; ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
14104 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Mlock problem.
14105
14106 Have u tried to restart services? I had the same problem before. Restart
14107 services and normally it will be fixed. mabie its just a desync.
14108 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
14109 <admin@epicirc.net> wrote:
14110 > I have a question for one of my channels they have
14111 tried to enable Mlock and
14112 > have been unable to get it to work. It shows that
14113 its set, but doesn't
14114 > work.
14115 >
14116 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Information for channel #xxxx:
14117 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Founder: XXXXXXXX [12:38pm] -ChanServ-
14118 > Description: Description.
14119 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Registered: Feb 21 17:16:59
14120 2005
14121 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Last used: Oct 08 12:38:12 2005 [12:38pm]
14122 > -ChanServ- Options: Topic Retention,
14123 Private, Secure Ops, Secure,
14124 > Enforce
14125 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Mode lock: +mnstl [12:38pm] -ChanServ- For more
14126 > information, type:
14127 /msg ChanServ INFO #xxxx
14128 > ALL
14129 >
14130 > Works fine for other channels on the network but not
14131 for this one.
14132 >
14133 > Here is an example of what happens when a normal op
14134 changes modes:
14135 >
14136 > [12:45pm] me sets mode: +pi-smnt
14137 > [12:45pm] me sets mode: -l+k sdsds
14138 >
14139 > Chanserv never undos this change.
14140 >
14141 > Thanks for the help,
14142 >
14143 > XanaX
14144 > EpicIRC Sr. Network Admin.
14145 > ------------
14146 >
14147 ------------------------------------------------------------------
14148 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
14149 visit:
14150 >
14151 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14152
14153
14154 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
14155
14156
14157 -------------- next part --------------
14158 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
14159 Name: smime.p7s
14160 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
14161 Size: 3049 bytes
14162 Desc: not available
14163 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20051008/91cd683a/smime.bin
14164 From admin at epicirc.net Sat Oct 8 15:09:22 2005
14165 From: admin at epicirc.net (EpicIRC Administration)
14166 Date: Sat Oct 8 15:09:32 2005
14167 Subject: [IRCServices] Mlock problem.
14168 In-Reply-To: <20051008220409.C3BBEE907D2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
14169 Message-ID: <20051008220931.1C8DAE907D2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
14170
14171 Yup that fixed the problem. Kind of strange, but thanks for the help!
14172
14173
14174
14175 -----Original Message-----
14176 From: EpicIRC Administration [mailto:admin@epicirc.net]
14177 Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 5:04 PM
14178 To: ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
14179 Subject: RE: [IRCServices] Mlock problem.
14180
14181 Hm no I havent tried that. It works fine in other channels. I hate to
14182 restart services though, but I guess its worth a shot. Ill get back to you.
14183
14184
14185 -----Original Message-----
14186 From: Dionisios K. [mailto:vonitsa_net@yahoo.gr]
14187 Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 4:38 PM
14188 To: admin@epicirc.net; ircservices@ircservices.esper.net
14189 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Mlock problem.
14190
14191 Have u tried to restart services? I had the same problem before. Restart
14192 services and normally it will be fixed. mabie its just a desync.
14193 --- ircservices-bounces@ircservices.esper.net
14194 <admin@epicirc.net> wrote:
14195 > I have a question for one of my channels they have
14196 tried to enable Mlock and
14197 > have been unable to get it to work. It shows that
14198 its set, but doesn't
14199 > work.
14200 >
14201 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Information for channel #xxxx:
14202 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Founder: XXXXXXXX [12:38pm] -ChanServ-
14203 > Description: Description.
14204 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Registered: Feb 21 17:16:59
14205 2005
14206 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Last used: Oct 08 12:38:12 2005 [12:38pm]
14207 > -ChanServ- Options: Topic Retention,
14208 Private, Secure Ops, Secure,
14209 > Enforce
14210 > [12:38pm] -ChanServ- Mode lock: +mnstl [12:38pm] -ChanServ- For more
14211 > information, type:
14212 /msg ChanServ INFO #xxxx
14213 > ALL
14214 >
14215 > Works fine for other channels on the network but not
14216 for this one.
14217 >
14218 > Here is an example of what happens when a normal op
14219 changes modes:
14220 >
14221 > [12:45pm] me sets mode: +pi-smnt
14222 > [12:45pm] me sets mode: -l+k sdsds
14223 >
14224 > Chanserv never undos this change.
14225 >
14226 > Thanks for the help,
14227 >
14228 > XanaX
14229 > EpicIRC Sr. Network Admin.
14230 > ------------
14231 >
14232 ------------------------------------------------------------------
14233 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options,
14234 visit:
14235 >
14236 http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14237
14238
14239 Dionisios K. - ToXiC On HellenicNet
14240
14241
14242 -------------- next part --------------
14243 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
14244 Name: smime.p7s
14245 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
14246 Size: 3049 bytes
14247 Desc: not available
14248 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20051008/2ee33a42/smime-0001.bin
14249 From achurch at achurch.org Fri Oct 14 18:36:13 2005
14250 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14251 Date: Fri Oct 14 02:46:00 2005
14252 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with IRCservices connection to UnrealIRCD
14253 In-Reply-To: <43467008.7080106@gmail.com>
14254 Message-ID: <434f7e43.30267@msgid.achurch.org>
14255
14256 >> w00t, from the UnrealIRCD.com forums told me that there's maybe a rather obscure option in the ircservices config which I have to enable and I should post to this mailing list. So I hope that you guys can help me, please.
14257 >
14258 >Yeah, I'm not 100% sure on this - but I seem to remember somebody else
14259 >having the same problem, and finding there was an option related to
14260 >pings or something?
14261
14262 There was a similar problem report on the list a few months back
14263 (2005/7/10), but no replies, and I never found anything that looked like it
14264 could be a problem. Given that this seems to be a rare occurrence, my gut
14265 instinct is that somewhere between Services and Unreal the linefeeds are
14266 getting mangled, resulting in Unreal not finding the SERVER message and
14267 replying, but I have no idea where this could be happening, and without a
14268 packet dump I can't even check whether that's really the case or not in the
14269 first place.
14270
14271 --Andrew Church
14272 achurch@achurch.org
14273 http://achurch.org/
14274 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Fri Oct 14 02:54:42 2005
14275 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (Robin Burchell)
14276 Date: Fri Oct 14 02:55:15 2005
14277 Subject: [IRCServices] Problem with IRCservices connection to UnrealIRCD
14278 In-Reply-To: <434f7e43.30267@msgid.achurch.org>
14279 References: <434f7e43.30267@msgid.achurch.org>
14280 Message-ID: <434F8062.3070409@gmail.com>
14281
14282 Andrew Church wrote:
14283 > There was a similar problem report on the list a few months back
14284 > (2005/7/10), but no replies, and I never found anything that looked like it
14285 > could be a problem. Given that this seems to be a rare occurrence, my gut
14286 > instinct is that somewhere between Services and Unreal the linefeeds are
14287 > getting mangled, resulting in Unreal not finding the SERVER message and
14288 > replying, but I have no idea where this could be happening, and without a
14289 > packet dump I can't even check whether that's really the case or not in the
14290 > first place.
14291
14292 Without it being reproducable at all, I simply have no idea.. I've
14293 snapped a copy of .54 up and running in no time, same with .55 - both
14294 with no problems.
14295
14296 If I ever run into it though, I'll see what I can pull up.
14297 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sun Oct 23 19:48:20 2005
14298 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
14299 Date: Sun Oct 23 19:48:46 2005
14300 Subject: [IRCServices] Some pseudoclients send incorrect 318 numeric.
14301 Message-ID: <b19eae4e0510231948t3687b1eexad89cbc018b1d40d@mail.gmail.com>
14302
14303 Apologies if this comes in HTML form or anything, I'm not able to
14304 connect at home. Ergo, this is also a bit more brief than I had
14305 previously intended as I'm not able to get my debug output etc from
14306 home :)
14307
14308 Anyhow, on to the report.
14309
14310 Some pseudoclients send an incorrect 381 numeric:
14311
14312 :services.blah.blah 381 End of /WHOIS
14313
14314 as opposed to something like
14315 :services.blah.blah 381 w00t ChanServ :End of /WHOIS
14316 (excuse me if I get that wrong.)
14317
14318 >From memory, affected services are ChanServ, MemoServ, HelpServ. There
14319 may be more, and I'm not sure if HelpServ was :p can't remember.
14320
14321 Thanks.
14322
14323 --w00t
14324 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Wed Oct 26 03:00:33 2005
14325 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
14326 Date: Wed Oct 26 03:01:08 2005
14327 Subject: [IRCServices] translate services
14328 Message-ID: <001501c5da14$1ccac8e0$331405d5@server>
14329
14330 hello there.
14331 I want some information about translating ircservices to the greek language.
14332 What editor i can use on windows XP and any other useful information.
14333
14334
14335 From martin at rodecker.nl Wed Oct 26 03:09:40 2005
14336 From: martin at rodecker.nl (Martin Pels)
14337 Date: Wed Oct 26 03:09:48 2005
14338 Subject: [IRCServices] translate services
14339 In-Reply-To: <001501c5da14$1ccac8e0$331405d5@server>
14340 References: <001501c5da14$1ccac8e0$331405d5@server>
14341 Message-ID: <3024.2001:610:108:45:211:43ff:fe12:add5.1130321380.squirrel@webmail.rodecker.nl>
14342
14343 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
14344 Hash: SHA1
14345
14346 On Wed, October 26, 2005 12:00, Dionisios K. said:
14347 > hello there.
14348 > I want some information about translating ircservices to the greek
14349 > language.
14350 > What editor i can use on windows XP and any other useful information.
14351 >
14352
14353 en_us.l is the file you want to copy and edit. Any editor will do, as long
14354 as it doesn't insert Windows-style linebreaks.
14355 There are also plenty of tools available (e.g. dos2unix) to remove these
14356 linebreaks after you're done editing.
14357
14358 Good luck :-)
14359
14360 Grtz,
14361 Martin
14362
14363 >
14364 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14365 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14366 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14367 >
14368
14369
14370 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14371 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
14372
14373 iD8DBQFDX1XkS4/1OagNDM4RAnBDAJ9WNuVf1AgbPeaR8jgrzoOUOwd43wCglIKN
14374 VkUW232CdY+AgnZGVt2R4ZQ=
14375 =B79s
14376 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
14377
14378 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Oct 26 23:20:50 2005
14379 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14380 Date: Wed Oct 26 07:21:16 2005
14381 Subject: [IRCServices] Some pseudoclients send incorrect 318 numeric.
14382 In-Reply-To: <b19eae4e0510231948t3687b1eexad89cbc018b1d40d@mail.gmail.com>
14383 Message-ID: <435f90ce.10042@msgid.achurch.org>
14384
14385 >Some pseudoclients send an incorrect 381 numeric:
14386 >
14387 >:services.blah.blah 381 End of /WHOIS
14388
14389 Fixed, thanks for the report.
14390
14391 --Andrew Church
14392 achurch@achurch.org
14393 http://achurch.org/
14394 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Wed Oct 26 16:09:08 2005
14395 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
14396 Date: Wed Oct 26 16:09:20 2005
14397 Subject: [IRCServices] translate services
14398 In-Reply-To: <001501c5da14$1ccac8e0$331405d5@server>
14399 References: <001501c5da14$1ccac8e0$331405d5@server>
14400 Message-ID: <b19eae4e0510261609mc805f81m72f57441553cdaaf@mail.gmail.com>
14401
14402 I use crimson editor myself, don't know how useful it'd be for
14403 services language files though, not sure on the technical details :)
14404
14405 On 10/26/05, Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr> wrote:
14406 > hello there.
14407 > I want some information about translating ircservices to the greek language.
14408 > What editor i can use on windows XP and any other useful information.
14409 >
14410 >
14411 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14412 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14413 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14414 >
14415
14416
14417 --
14418 --w00t
14419 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Mon Oct 31 17:05:20 2005
14420 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
14421 Date: Mon Oct 31 17:05:37 2005
14422 Subject: [IRCServices] NS DROP warning?
14423 Message-ID: <b19eae4e0510311705v71d2d274qb8c88b2dacbe710e@mail.gmail.com>
14424
14425 A thought I had recently after dropping my nickname by accident a few
14426 months back.. Perhaps on the 'confirm' message for NS DROP, it should
14427 have a reminder it *doesn't* do the same thing as UNLINK?
14428
14429 Sounds silly, I know - but I managed to drop mine, and I've heard of
14430 two other cases of this happening.
14431 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Wed Nov 2 17:08:58 2005
14432 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
14433 Date: Wed Nov 2 17:09:24 2005
14434 Subject: [IRCServices] Couple of Security Feature requests..
14435 Message-ID: <4369632A.5020705@frostycoolslug.com>
14436
14437 Kinda simple really, Had a user who's recently been annoying, resulting
14438 in a network ban, this got the staff talking about possible evasion
14439 techniques..
14440
14441 Firstly, we've forbidden his nicknames, i may have to recheck the docs
14442 on this one, but if it doesn't already exist, can services provide a
14443 wallops when someone attempts to USE a forbidden nickname? (That one can
14444 be made into a module easily enough, other people may like it so it
14445 would probably be better in the core)
14446
14447 Secondly, a way to ban use of email addresses, and again, alert opers if
14448 someone attempts to use it.
14449
14450 These would help crack down on people attempting to evade bans, as they
14451 could be spotted easily :)
14452
14453 Thanks.
14454
14455 --
14456 Craig McLure
14457
14458 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Nov 4 12:27:54 2005
14459 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
14460 Date: Fri Nov 4 12:29:10 2005
14461 Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14462 Message-ID: <000501c5e17e$40fc69a0$472005d5@server>
14463
14464 I think that services should send a global notice when a services admin
14465 changes the founder of a channel.
14466
14467
14468 From stratus at blazeirc.net Fri Nov 4 13:16:48 2005
14469 From: stratus at blazeirc.net (Jim Stratus)
14470 Date: Fri Nov 4 13:19:09 2005
14471 Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14472 References: <000501c5e17e$40fc69a0$472005d5@server>
14473 Message-ID: <000e01c5e185$11580bd0$c2db7286@noteryan>
14474
14475 Why?
14476 ----- Original Message -----
14477 From: "Dionisios K." <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
14478 To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
14479 Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:27 PM
14480 Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14481
14482
14483 >I think that services should send a global notice when a services admin
14484 > changes the founder of a channel.
14485 >
14486 >
14487 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14488 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14489 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14490 From QuietFinn at myrealbox.com Fri Nov 4 13:53:58 2005
14491 From: QuietFinn at myrealbox.com (QuietFinn)
14492 Date: Fri Nov 4 13:54:14 2005
14493 Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14494 In-Reply-To: <000e01c5e185$11580bd0$c2db7286@noteryan>
14495 Message-ID: <CMEIKFEMFPDDCJPEAMDCGEIFELAA.QuietFinn@myrealbox.com>
14496
14497
14498 I think this is again one of those many cases where someone who is not
14499 really trusted has got Services Admin access.
14500 In fact I have seen "networks" where half of the opers have been Services
14501 Roots, and the rest "just" Services Admins.
14502 So for *that* kind of networks I suppose it's very good if services send a
14503 global notice when the Services Admins do about *anything*.
14504
14505 quietFinn
14506
14507
14508 >
14509 > Why?
14510 > ----- Original Message -----
14511 > From: "Dionisios K." <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
14512 > To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
14513 > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:27 PM
14514 > Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14515 >
14516 >
14517 > >I think that services should send a global notice when a services admin
14518 > > changes the founder of a channel.
14519 > >
14520 > >
14521 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14522 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14523 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14524 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14525 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14526 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14527 >
14528 >
14529
14530
14531 From admin at vonitsanet.gr Fri Nov 4 16:33:35 2005
14532 From: admin at vonitsanet.gr (Dionisios K.)
14533 Date: Fri Nov 4 16:33:53 2005
14534 Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14535 References: <000501c5e17e$40fc69a0$472005d5@server>
14536 <000e01c5e185$11580bd0$c2db7286@noteryan>
14537 Message-ID: <001601c5e1a0$912c8c80$082105d5@server>
14538
14539 When a services admin uses /cs set #chan password as a services admin and
14540 not as founder services informs all the opers about this with globops.
14541 So if i want not to inform about a set pass i can just change the founder of
14542 the channel to me and then "normally" /cs set #chan paassword.
14543
14544 This is the logic of the whole thing.
14545
14546 PS: the point is NOT that i dont trust my admins.
14547 The point is that the "set $chan founder" command is similar to "set #chan
14548 password" ( the 2 commands that only a founder can execute).
14549 So if for the first command a globops is sent out why not to the second
14550 command?
14551
14552 ----- Original Message -----
14553 From: "Jim Stratus" <stratus@blazeirc.net>
14554 To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
14555 Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:16 PM
14556 Subject: Re: [IRCServices] SET founder
14557
14558
14559 > Why?
14560 > ----- Original Message -----
14561 > From: "Dionisios K." <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
14562 > To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
14563 > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:27 PM
14564 > Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14565 >
14566 >
14567 >>I think that services should send a global notice when a services admin
14568 >>changes the founder of a
14569 >>channel. ------------------------------------------------------------------
14570 >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14571 >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14572 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14573 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14574 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14575 >
14576
14577
14578 From xxx.coder at gmail.com Sat Nov 5 05:32:02 2005
14579 From: xxx.coder at gmail.com (ongeboren)
14580 Date: Sat Nov 5 05:32:10 2005
14581 Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14582 In-Reply-To: <001601c5e1a0$912c8c80$082105d5@server>
14583 References: <000501c5e17e$40fc69a0$472005d5@server>
14584 <000e01c5e185$11580bd0$c2db7286@noteryan>
14585 <001601c5e1a0$912c8c80$082105d5@server>
14586 Message-ID: <ce6d53600511050532n1d1b459dh56507760500056ff@mail.gmail.com>
14587
14588 it should be sent out for the second command aswel.
14589 /* personal experience from a 35K+ users network */
14590
14591 On 11/5/05, Dionisios K. <admin@vonitsanet.gr> wrote:
14592 > When a services admin uses /cs set #chan password as a services admin and
14593 > not as founder services informs all the opers about this with globops.
14594 > So if i want not to inform about a set pass i can just change the founder of
14595 > the channel to me and then "normally" /cs set #chan paassword.
14596 >
14597 > This is the logic of the whole thing.
14598 >
14599 > PS: the point is NOT that i dont trust my admins.
14600 > The point is that the "set $chan founder" command is similar to "set #chan
14601 > password" ( the 2 commands that only a founder can execute).
14602 > So if for the first command a globops is sent out why not to the second
14603 > command?
14604 >
14605 > ----- Original Message -----
14606 > From: "Jim Stratus" <stratus@blazeirc.net>
14607 > To: "IRC Services General Mailing List" <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
14608 > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:16 PM
14609 > Subject: Re: [IRCServices] SET founder
14610 >
14611 >
14612 > > Why?
14613 > > ----- Original Message -----
14614 > > From: "Dionisios K." <admin@vonitsanet.gr>
14615 > > To: <ircservices@ircservices.esper.net>
14616 > > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:27 PM
14617 > > Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14618 > >
14619 > >
14620 > >>I think that services should send a global notice when a services admin
14621 > >>changes the founder of a
14622 > >>channel. ------------------------------------------------------------------
14623 > >> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14624 > >> http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14625 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14626 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14627 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14628 > >
14629 >
14630 >
14631 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14632 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14633 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14634 >
14635
14636
14637 --
14638 Evlogi Petrov - ongeboren@UniBG
14639 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Nov 6 11:22:27 2005
14640 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14641 Date: Sat Nov 5 18:43:25 2005
14642 Subject: [IRCServices] SET founder
14643 In-Reply-To: <001601c5e1a0$912c8c80$082105d5@server>
14644 Message-ID: <436d6dc6.07644@msgid.achurch.org>
14645
14646 >When a services admin uses /cs set #chan password as a services admin and
14647 >not as founder services informs all the opers about this with globops.
14648 >So if i want not to inform about a set pass i can just change the founder of
14649 >the channel to me and then "normally" /cs set #chan paassword.
14650 >
14651 >This is the logic of the whole thing.
14652
14653 This is a good point. What Services should really do is send a
14654 wallops on any such use of servadmin privileges (if the appropriate
14655 configuration option is set), but I'll wait for 5.1 to do a proper
14656 implementation of that. In the meantime, all founder changes, whether by a
14657 servadmin or not, are logged to the logfile; if you also want wallops for
14658 servadmin changes, the following patch (not tested) to 5.0.55 should do the
14659 job.
14660
14661 --Andrew Church
14662 achurch@achurch.org
14663 http://achurch.org/
14664
14665 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
14666
14667 Index: modules/chanserv/set.c
14668 ===================================================================
14669 RCS file: /var/local/cvsroot/ircservices/modules/chanserv/set.c,v
14670 retrieving revision 2.42.2.5
14671 diff -u -r2.42.2.5 set.c
14672 --- modules/chanserv/set.c 13 Aug 2005 04:13:10 -0000 2.42.2.5
14673 +++ modules/chanserv/set.c 6 Nov 2005 02:41:55 -0000
14674 @@ -196,6 +196,10 @@
14675 notice_lang(s_ChanServ, u, CHAN_SET_FOUNDER_TOO_MANY_CHANS, param);
14676 return;
14677 }
14678 + if (!is_founder(u, ci) && WallSetpass) {
14679 + wallops(s_ChanServ, "\2%s\2 set founder as Services admin for "
14680 + "channel \2%s\2", u->nick, ci->name);
14681 + }
14682 uncount_chan(ci);
14683 oldngi = get_ngi_id(ci->founder);
14684 module_log("Changing founder of %s from %s to %s by %s!%s@%s", ci->name,
14685 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Nov 6 11:46:45 2005
14686 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14687 Date: Sat Nov 5 18:49:32 2005
14688 Subject: [IRCServices] NS DROP warning?
14689 In-Reply-To: <b19eae4e0510311705v71d2d274qb8c88b2dacbe710e@mail.gmail.com>
14690 Message-ID: <436d6f37.07664@msgid.achurch.org>
14691
14692 >A thought I had recently after dropping my nickname by accident a few
14693 >months back.. Perhaps on the 'confirm' message for NS DROP, it should
14694 >have a reminder it *doesn't* do the same thing as UNLINK?
14695 >
14696 >Sounds silly, I know - but I managed to drop mine, and I've heard of
14697 >two other cases of this happening.
14698
14699 Such a warning is already sent if you omit the password. If you give
14700 the password, it's assumed you're familiar with the new (5.0) syntax and
14701 you know what you're doing.
14702
14703 --Andrew Church
14704 achurch@achurch.org
14705 http://achurch.org/
14706 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Nov 6 11:50:00 2005
14707 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14708 Date: Sat Nov 5 18:51:24 2005
14709 Subject: [IRCServices] Couple of Security Feature requests..
14710 In-Reply-To: <4369632A.5020705@frostycoolslug.com>
14711 Message-ID: <436d6fa7.07700@msgid.achurch.org>
14712
14713 >Firstly, we've forbidden his nicknames, i may have to recheck the docs
14714 >on this one, but if it doesn't already exist, can services provide a
14715 >wallops when someone attempts to USE a forbidden nickname? (That one can
14716 >be made into a module easily enough, other people may like it so it
14717 >would probably be better in the core)
14718
14719 Unless there's significant call for it, a third-party module ought to
14720 be sufficient.
14721
14722 >Secondly, a way to ban use of email addresses, and again, alert opers if
14723 >someone attempts to use it.
14724
14725 I'm considering adding configuration options to limit registerable
14726 addresses for 5.1.
14727
14728 --Andrew Church
14729 achurch@achurch.org
14730 http://achurch.org/
14731 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sun Nov 6 22:05:37 2005
14732 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
14733 Date: Sun Nov 6 22:05:47 2005
14734 Subject: [IRCServices] NS DROP warning?
14735 In-Reply-To: <436d6f37.07664@msgid.achurch.org>
14736 References: <b19eae4e0510311705v71d2d274qb8c88b2dacbe710e@mail.gmail.com>
14737 <436d6f37.07664@msgid.achurch.org>
14738 Message-ID: <b19eae4e0511062205j393cfca3qc13261b3931cb0c3@mail.gmail.com>
14739
14740 If you omit the password, however if you give it a nickname thinking
14741 it will drop that nickname.. it just mentions wrong password, making
14742 me assume I needed to provide the password to drop a linked nick.
14743
14744 On 11/6/05, Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org> wrote:
14745 > >A thought I had recently after dropping my nickname by accident a few
14746 > >months back.. Perhaps on the 'confirm' message for NS DROP, it should
14747 > >have a reminder it *doesn't* do the same thing as UNLINK?
14748 > >
14749 > >Sounds silly, I know - but I managed to drop mine, and I've heard of
14750 > >two other cases of this happening.
14751 >
14752 > Such a warning is already sent if you omit the password. If you give
14753 > the password, it's assumed you're familiar with the new (5.0) syntax and
14754 > you know what you're doing.
14755 >
14756 > --Andrew Church
14757 > achurch@achurch.org
14758 > http://achurch.org/
14759 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14760 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14761 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14762 >
14763
14764
14765 --
14766 --w00t
14767 From achurch at achurch.org Mon Nov 7 15:35:01 2005
14768 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14769 Date: Sun Nov 6 22:42:07 2005
14770 Subject: [IRCServices] NS DROP warning?
14771 In-Reply-To: <b19eae4e0511062205j393cfca3qc13261b3931cb0c3@mail.gmail.com>
14772 Message-ID: <436ef731.06425@msgid.achurch.org>
14773
14774 >If you omit the password, however if you give it a nickname thinking
14775 >it will drop that nickname.. it just mentions wrong password, making
14776 >me assume I needed to provide the password to drop a linked nick.
14777
14778 If you try "DROP nick pass" (or "DROP pass nick"), it'll still give
14779 you an error; if you then try "DROP pass" without thinking to check the
14780 help and see why it might be giving you an error, then frankly you deserve
14781 what you get. :P But I can accept the argument that giving two parameters
14782 should result in "syntax error" rather than "password incorrect"; I'll
14783 change that for the next release.
14784
14785 --Andrew Church
14786 achurch@achurch.org
14787 http://achurch.org/
14788 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sun Nov 6 23:07:24 2005
14789 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
14790 Date: Sun Nov 6 23:07:33 2005
14791 Subject: [IRCServices] NS DROP warning?
14792 In-Reply-To: <436ef731.06425@msgid.achurch.org>
14793 References: <b19eae4e0511062205j393cfca3qc13261b3931cb0c3@mail.gmail.com>
14794 <436ef731.06425@msgid.achurch.org>
14795 Message-ID: <b19eae4e0511062307h5cc64567jf53935b3ec9eef70@mail.gmail.com>
14796
14797 Well, I (and other people) just assumed that it added a level of
14798 security... but I won't be doing it again :p
14799
14800 Thanks.
14801
14802 On 11/7/05, Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org> wrote:
14803 > >If you omit the password, however if you give it a nickname thinking
14804 > >it will drop that nickname.. it just mentions wrong password, making
14805 > >me assume I needed to provide the password to drop a linked nick.
14806 >
14807 > If you try "DROP nick pass" (or "DROP pass nick"), it'll still give
14808 > you an error; if you then try "DROP pass" without thinking to check the
14809 > help and see why it might be giving you an error, then frankly you deserve
14810 > what you get. :P But I can accept the argument that giving two parameters
14811 > should result in "syntax error" rather than "password incorrect"; I'll
14812 > change that for the next release.
14813 >
14814 > --Andrew Church
14815 > achurch@achurch.org
14816 > http://achurch.org/
14817 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
14818 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
14819 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
14820 >
14821
14822
14823 --
14824 --w00t
14825 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Nov 20 08:33:12 2005
14826 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14827 Date: Sat Nov 19 15:34:46 2005
14828 Subject: [IRCServices] Services 5.0.56 released
14829 Message-ID: <437fb688.64122@msgid.achurch.org>
14830
14831 Services 5.0.56 has been released, and can be downloaded from:
14832
14833 http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/ (Japan)
14834 ftp://ftp.esper.net/ircservices/ (Western USA)
14835
14836 82ba56e96d7db5b6e59073dc3e5e029f ircservices-5.0.56.tar.gz
14837 5046cc95cc0536e24dfb5fd7bfbe733f ircservices-5.0.56.diff.gz
14838 218137e2cfa0b1624c2cb729d6abdb23 ircservices-5.0.56-1.i386.rpm
14839 dba4779adaa16276d7f66edb0f767459 ircservices_5.0.56-1_i386.deb
14840
14841 The mirrors should have it shortly.
14842
14843 This release addresses the issue raised recently regarding accidental
14844 dropping of nicknames through ignorance of the command format (though it's
14845 still my position that if you get an unexpected error from a command and
14846 don't bother to check the help text for why that error might have happened,
14847 you deserve what you get). A couple of minor bugs have also been fixed.
14848
14849 For the curious, 5.1 is progressing as well, and an alpha should be
14850 out by the end of the year (maybe even by the end of the month, but don't
14851 count on it).
14852
14853 Changes in version 5.0.56
14854 -------------------------
14855 2005/11/20 Fixed a bug in StatServ that could cause a crash if
14856 StatServ was unloaded with a rehash while Services
14857 was running.
14858 2005/11/07 Changed NickServ and ChanServ SET PASSWORD to prevent the
14859 use of spaces in passwords.
14860 2005/11/07 The NickServ commands DROP, RECOVER, RELEASE, and GHOST now
14861 report a syntax error rather than "password incorrect"
14862 when too many parameters are given. (As a result,
14863 passwords containing spaces can no longer be used with
14864 these commands. Use IDENTIFY followed by SET PASSWORD
14865 to set a new password without spaces.)
14866 2005/10/26 Fixed incorrect end-of-/WHOIS responses for several
14867 pseudoclients. Reported by Robin Burchell
14868 <surreal.w00t@gmail.com>
14869
14870 --Andrew Church
14871 achurch@achurch.org
14872 http://achurch.org/
14873 From achurch at achurch.org Sun Nov 20 20:53:05 2005
14874 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14875 Date: Sun Nov 20 03:58:18 2005
14876 Subject: [IRCServices] 5.0.56: whoops, forgot something
14877 Message-ID: <438064d3.30614@msgid.achurch.org>
14878
14879 I neglected to mention an important side effect of the changes in
14880 password handling introduced in Services 5.0.56. While the NickServ and
14881 ChanServ REGISTER commands do not allow spaces in passwords, the SET
14882 PASSWORD command did allow them prior to 5.0.56, so it is possible that
14883 some people have spaces in their passwords; in this case, commands such as
14884 RECOVER and DROP will no longer work. This can be resolved by having the
14885 user first identify for the nickname or channel, then use SET PASSWORD to
14886 change the password to one that does not contain spaces. (IDENTIFY
14887 processing has been left alone for 5.0 for this reason--it will also be
14888 changed in 5.1 to report a syntax error if a password with spaces is
14889 given.)
14890
14891 Apologies for any inconvenience this may cause.
14892
14893 --Andrew Church
14894 achurch@achurch.org
14895 http://achurch.org/
14896 From achurch at achurch.org Wed Nov 23 03:16:52 2005
14897 From: achurch at achurch.org (Andrew Church)
14898 Date: Tue Nov 22 10:19:13 2005
14899 Subject: [IRCServices] Mailing list issues
14900 Message-ID: <4383611a.75045@msgid.achurch.org>
14901
14902 Just a quick note: I've had a couple of reports recently of people
14903 not being able to send mail to the list, getting an error back from the
14904 mail server instead. I'm looking into more permanent solutions, but in the
14905 meantime, if you encounter such an error, please send your message to me
14906 instead and I'll forward it to the list.
14907
14908 Apologies for the inconvenience.
14909
14910 --Andrew Church
14911 achurch@achurch.org
14912 http://achurch.org/
14913 From henti at geekware.co.za Thu Nov 24 05:19:14 2005
14914 From: henti at geekware.co.za (Henti Smith)
14915 Date: Thu Nov 24 23:57:19 2005
14916 Subject: [IRCServices] Web interface to services :)
14917 Message-ID: <20051124151914.60080705@fmg>
14918
14919 hi guys,
14920
14921 I'm looking at developing a web interface to services.
14922
14923 I have played with the current webpage support on the ircd, but I'm
14924 looking for something that I can use for users to use to manipulate
14925 services instead of using the irc command interface.
14926
14927 this will obviosly be linked to services in some way and I'm trying to
14928 understand how the services works so I can best work out how to
14929 integrate the web stuff.
14930
14931 Would this be the correct place for this or should I ask in the coding
14932 list ?
14933
14934 Thanks :)
14935
14936 --
14937 Henti Smith
14938 henti@geekware.co.za
14939 +27 82 958 2525
14940 http://www.geekware.co.za
14941
14942 DISCLAIMER :
14943
14944 Unauthorised use of characters, images, sounds, odors, severed limbs,
14945 noodles, wierd dreams, strange looking fruit, oxygen, and certain parts
14946 of Jupiter are strictly forbidden. If I find you violating, or
14947 molesting my property in any way, I will employ a pair of burly
14948 convicts to find you, kidnap you, and perform god-awful sexual
14949 experiments on you until you lose the ability to sound out vowels. I
14950 don't know why you are still reading this, but by doing so you have
14951 proven that you have far too much time on your hands, and you should go
14952 plant a tree, or read a book or something.
14953 - http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/
14954 From fearx at optonline.net Fri Nov 25 03:32:46 2005
14955 From: fearx at optonline.net (Carl)
14956 Date: Fri Nov 25 03:33:17 2005
14957 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
14958 Message-ID: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net>
14959
14960 Hello,
14961 I just got the services up and running correctly. Now, I cant figure
14962 out how to actually control them, since I'm a services admin, as well as
14963 a netadmin. How do I control the services to do what I need, for
14964 example, getting Chanserv in the networks support channel and things
14965 along those lines.
14966
14967 Thanks for the help,
14968 Carl
14969 From henti at geekware.co.za Fri Nov 25 03:39:54 2005
14970 From: henti at geekware.co.za (Henti Smith)
14971 Date: Fri Nov 25 03:40:20 2005
14972 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
14973 In-Reply-To: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net>
14974 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net>
14975 Message-ID: <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
14976
14977 On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 06:32:46 -0500
14978 Carl <fearx@optonline.net> wrote:
14979
14980 > Hello,
14981
14982 hi,
14983
14984 > I just got the services up and running correctly. Now, I cant
14985 > figure out how to actually control them, since I'm a services admin,
14986 > as well as a netadmin. How do I control the services to do what I
14987 > need, for example, getting Chanserv in the networks support channel
14988 > and things along those lines.
14989
14990 you're not being very clear on your needs.
14991
14992 Once services is up and running ... provided you have the configs
14993 correctly .. you can send commands like "/msg chanserv help commands"
14994 to get a full list of commands availible
14995
14996 from there you can register and set options on your channel.
14997
14998 same for nickserv etc etc
14999
15000 H
15001
15002
15003 --
15004 Henti Smith
15005 henti@geekware.co.za
15006 +27 82 958 2525
15007 http://www.geekware.co.za
15008
15009 DISCLAIMER :
15010
15011 Unauthorised use of characters, images, sounds, odors, severed limbs,
15012 noodles, wierd dreams, strange looking fruit, oxygen, and certain parts
15013 of Jupiter are strictly forbidden. If I find you violating, or
15014 molesting my property in any way, I will employ a pair of burly
15015 convicts to find you, kidnap you, and perform god-awful sexual
15016 experiments on you until you lose the ability to sound out vowels. I
15017 don't know why you are still reading this, but by doing so you have
15018 proven that you have far too much time on your hands, and you should go
15019 plant a tree, or read a book or something.
15020 - http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/
15021 From fearx at optonline.net Fri Nov 25 03:42:14 2005
15022 From: fearx at optonline.net (Carl)
15023 Date: Fri Nov 25 03:42:43 2005
15024 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15025 In-Reply-To: <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
15026 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net> <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
15027 Message-ID: <4386F896.7050404@optonline.net>
15028
15029 Oh, I see, I was just assuming I could control the services without
15030 registering and whatnot.
15031
15032 Sorry for not being clear, its 7am and I've been up all night :)
15033
15034 Thanks.
15035 From medice at gmx.at Fri Nov 25 03:44:01 2005
15036 From: medice at gmx.at (Medice)
15037 Date: Fri Nov 25 03:44:16 2005
15038 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15039 In-Reply-To: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net>
15040 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net>
15041 Message-ID: <4386F901.9010106@gmx.at>
15042
15043 Carl wrote:
15044 > Hello,
15045 > I just got the services up and running correctly. Now, I cant figure
15046 > out how to actually control them, since I'm a services admin, as well as
15047 > a netadmin. How do I control the services to do what I need, for
15048 > example, getting Chanserv in the networks support channel and things
15049 > along those lines.
15050 >
15051 > Thanks for the help,
15052 > Carl
15053 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15054 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15055 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15056 >
15057 >
15058 chanserv does not join any channels.
15059 You can "control" either via the configuration files for some part (look
15060 at the example-confs what's possible there), or via irc-commands
15061 directed to nickserv & Co.
15062 There is also documentation-material attached to the ircservices-package.
15063
15064 hth
15065 Medice
15066 From henti at geekware.co.za Fri Nov 25 03:45:41 2005
15067 From: henti at geekware.co.za (Henti Smith)
15068 Date: Fri Nov 25 03:46:01 2005
15069 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15070 In-Reply-To: <4386F896.7050404@optonline.net>
15071 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net> <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
15072 <4386F896.7050404@optonline.net>
15073 Message-ID: <20051125134541.388e31ae@fmg>
15074
15075 On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 06:42:14 -0500
15076 Carl <fearx@optonline.net> wrote:
15077
15078 > Oh, I see, I was just assuming I could control the services without
15079 > registering and whatnot.
15080
15081 As a services administrator you should be able to .. you'll have access
15082 to options in all the Serv's which you don't need to register for ..
15083
15084 if you can talk to operserv you should be able to get the commands for
15085 a services admin ... if I recall ..
15086
15087 --
15088 Henti Smith
15089 henti@geekware.co.za
15090 +27 82 958 2525
15091 http://www.geekware.co.za
15092
15093 DISCLAIMER :
15094
15095 Unauthorised use of characters, images, sounds, odors, severed limbs,
15096 noodles, wierd dreams, strange looking fruit, oxygen, and certain parts
15097 of Jupiter are strictly forbidden. If I find you violating, or
15098 molesting my property in any way, I will employ a pair of burly
15099 convicts to find you, kidnap you, and perform god-awful sexual
15100 experiments on you until you lose the ability to sound out vowels. I
15101 don't know why you are still reading this, but by doing so you have
15102 proven that you have far too much time on your hands, and you should go
15103 plant a tree, or read a book or something.
15104 - http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/
15105 From fearx at optonline.net Fri Nov 25 04:28:17 2005
15106 From: fearx at optonline.net (Carl)
15107 Date: Fri Nov 25 04:28:49 2005
15108 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15109 In-Reply-To: <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
15110 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net> <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
15111 Message-ID: <43870361.2090704@optonline.net>
15112
15113 Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join a
15114 channel?
15115 From henti at geekware.co.za Fri Nov 25 04:42:23 2005
15116 From: henti at geekware.co.za (Henti Smith)
15117 Date: Fri Nov 25 04:43:03 2005
15118 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15119 In-Reply-To: <43870361.2090704@optonline.net>
15120 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net> <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
15121 <43870361.2090704@optonline.net>
15122 Message-ID: <20051125144223.48c11ff4@fmg>
15123
15124 On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:28:17 -0500
15125 Carl <fearx@optonline.net> wrote:
15126
15127 > Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join
15128 > a channel?
15129
15130 why would you want that ?
15131
15132 H
15133
15134 --
15135 Henti Smith
15136 henti@geekware.co.za
15137 +27 82 958 2525
15138 http://www.geekware.co.za
15139
15140 DISCLAIMER :
15141
15142 Unauthorised use of characters, images, sounds, odors, severed limbs,
15143 noodles, wierd dreams, strange looking fruit, oxygen, and certain parts
15144 of Jupiter are strictly forbidden. If I find you violating, or
15145 molesting my property in any way, I will employ a pair of burly
15146 convicts to find you, kidnap you, and perform god-awful sexual
15147 experiments on you until you lose the ability to sound out vowels. I
15148 don't know why you are still reading this, but by doing so you have
15149 proven that you have far too much time on your hands, and you should go
15150 plant a tree, or read a book or something.
15151 - http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/
15152 From QuietFinn at myrealbox.com Fri Nov 25 04:49:21 2005
15153 From: QuietFinn at myrealbox.com (QuietFinn)
15154 Date: Fri Nov 25 04:49:44 2005
15155 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15156 In-Reply-To: <43870361.2090704@optonline.net>
15157 Message-ID: <CMEIKFEMFPDDCJPEAMDCAEDKEMAA.QuietFinn@myrealbox.com>
15158
15159 >
15160 > Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join a
15161 > channel?
15162
15163 I suggest you read the FAQ here:
15164 http://www.ircservices.esper.net/docs/faq.html
15165
15166 The answer to your question is here:
15167 http://www.ircservices.esper.net/docs/faq.html#E1
15168
15169 /quietFinn
15170
15171
15172
15173 From dnb at majestic-liaisons.com Fri Nov 25 04:52:14 2005
15174 From: dnb at majestic-liaisons.com (DeadNotBuried)
15175 Date: Fri Nov 25 04:52:39 2005
15176 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15177 In-Reply-To: <43870361.2090704@optonline.net>
15178 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net> <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg>
15179 <43870361.2090704@optonline.net>
15180 Message-ID: <438708FE.5060403@majestic-liaisons.com>
15181
15182 Carl wrote:
15183 > Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join a
15184 > channel?
15185
15186 no (at least not without desyncing services)
15187 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Nov 25 05:20:27 2005
15188 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
15189 Date: Fri Nov 25 05:20:25 2005
15190 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15191 In-Reply-To: <438708FE.5060403@majestic-liaisons.com>
15192 References: <4386F65E.8090507@optonline.net>
15193 <20051125133954.6a8312bd@fmg> <43870361.2090704@optonline.net>
15194 <438708FE.5060403@majestic-liaisons.com>
15195 Message-ID: <43870F9B.3050007@frostycoolslug.com>
15196
15197 I'll elaborate a bit, Services doesn't know it exists, none of the
15198 pseudoclients are stored in the user struct, so in the event that a
15199 service DOES join a channel (Generally via /os raw :ChanServ join
15200 #channel), the services server will know nothing about it. This can
15201 sometimes lead to unexpected results especially if everyone leaves the
15202 channel (Services will think the channel is completely empty, when the
15203 IRCd is saying "There's one person in here" (hence desync). When someone
15204 then joins the channel services will try setting modes and topics which
15205 already exist which may lead to problems (Although personally I've never
15206 experienced any).
15207
15208 You can try it, there shouldn't be any problems, but if something blows
15209 up in your face don't say you weren't warned.
15210
15211 Also a reminder, /os raw is completely unsupported by anyone because it
15212 will generally lead to desyncs :)
15213
15214 DeadNotBuried wrote:
15215 > Carl wrote:
15216 >> Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join a
15217 >> channel?
15218 >
15219 > no (at least not without desyncing services)
15220 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15221 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15222 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15223 >
15224 >
15225
15226 From henti at geekware.co.za Fri Nov 25 06:03:16 2005
15227 From: henti at geekware.co.za (Henti Smith)
15228 Date: Fri Nov 25 06:03:39 2005
15229 Subject: [IRCServices] Web interface to services :)
15230 In-Reply-To: <20051124151914.60080705@fmg>
15231 References: <20051124151914.60080705@fmg>
15232 Message-ID: <20051125160316.7c9653be@fmg>
15233
15234 On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:19:14 +0200
15235 Henti Smith <henti@geekware.co.za> wrote:
15236
15237 > this will obviosly be linked to services in some way and I'm trying to
15238 > understand how the services works so I can best work out how to
15239 > integrate the web stuff.
15240
15241 so any ideas on this ... please ... or should I just go ahead and hack
15242 it ;P
15243
15244 I'm sure there are other that would want something like this ?
15245
15246 --
15247 Henti Smith
15248 henti@geekware.co.za
15249 +27 82 958 2525
15250 http://www.geekware.co.za
15251
15252 DISCLAIMER :
15253
15254 Unauthorised use of characters, images, sounds, odors, severed limbs,
15255 noodles, wierd dreams, strange looking fruit, oxygen, and certain parts
15256 of Jupiter are strictly forbidden. If I find you violating, or
15257 molesting my property in any way, I will employ a pair of burly
15258 convicts to find you, kidnap you, and perform god-awful sexual
15259 experiments on you until you lose the ability to sound out vowels. I
15260 don't know why you are still reading this, but by doing so you have
15261 proven that you have far too much time on your hands, and you should go
15262 plant a tree, or read a book or something.
15263 - http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/
15264 From Craig at frostycoolslug.com Fri Nov 25 06:12:45 2005
15265 From: Craig at frostycoolslug.com (Craig McLure)
15266 Date: Fri Nov 25 06:12:35 2005
15267 Subject: [IRCServices] Web interface to services :)
15268 In-Reply-To: <20051125160316.7c9653be@fmg>
15269 References: <20051124151914.60080705@fmg> <20051125160316.7c9653be@fmg>
15270 Message-ID: <43871BDD.20002@frostycoolslug.com>
15271
15272 I wouldn't recommend hacking the src, check out the module API, it's
15273 more than adequate for what you want to do (we know, we did it :P)
15274
15275 Henti Smith wrote:
15276 > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:19:14 +0200
15277 > Henti Smith <henti@geekware.co.za> wrote:
15278 >
15279 >> this will obviosly be linked to services in some way and I'm trying to
15280 >> understand how the services works so I can best work out how to
15281 >> integrate the web stuff.
15282 >
15283 > so any ideas on this ... please ... or should I just go ahead and hack
15284 > it ;P
15285 >
15286 > I'm sure there are other that would want something like this ?
15287 >
15288
15289 From henti at geekware.co.za Fri Nov 25 06:19:36 2005
15290 From: henti at geekware.co.za (Henti Smith)
15291 Date: Fri Nov 25 06:20:09 2005
15292 Subject: [IRCServices] Web interface to services :)
15293 In-Reply-To: <43871BDD.20002@frostycoolslug.com>
15294 References: <20051124151914.60080705@fmg> <20051125160316.7c9653be@fmg>
15295 <43871BDD.20002@frostycoolslug.com>
15296 Message-ID: <20051125161936.5fc635ef@fmg>
15297
15298 On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:12:45 +0000
15299 Craig McLure <Craig@frostycoolslug.com> wrote:
15300
15301 > I wouldn't recommend hacking the src, check out the module API, it's
15302 > more than adequate for what you want to do (we know, we did it :P)
15303
15304 heheh ... then I'll have to learn C ;P
15305
15306 I was hoping to be able to do something via php or something ...
15307 bleh ;P
15308
15309 H
15310
15311
15312 --
15313 Henti Smith
15314 henti@geekware.co.za
15315 +27 82 958 2525
15316 http://www.geekware.co.za
15317
15318 DISCLAIMER :
15319
15320 Unauthorised use of characters, images, sounds, odors, severed limbs,
15321 noodles, wierd dreams, strange looking fruit, oxygen, and certain parts
15322 of Jupiter are strictly forbidden. If I find you violating, or
15323 molesting my property in any way, I will employ a pair of burly
15324 convicts to find you, kidnap you, and perform god-awful sexual
15325 experiments on you until you lose the ability to sound out vowels. I
15326 don't know why you are still reading this, but by doing so you have
15327 proven that you have far too much time on your hands, and you should go
15328 plant a tree, or read a book or something.
15329 - http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/
15330 From ron2k at webmail.co.za Fri Nov 25 21:52:02 2005
15331 From: ron2k at webmail.co.za (Kieron Thwaites)
15332 Date: Fri Nov 25 21:52:35 2005
15333 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15334 In-Reply-To: <20051125122850.19751D401C2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
15335 References: <20051125122850.19751D401C2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
15336 Message-ID: <web-13155717@cgp6.sentechsa.net>
15337
15338 > Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join a
15339 > channel?
15340
15341 No, for reasons mentioned in the FAQ.
15342 ___________________________________________________________________
15343 For super low premiums, click here http://www.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm
15344
15345 http://www.webmail.co.za the South African FREE email service
15346 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sat Nov 26 00:43:35 2005
15347 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
15348 Date: Sat Nov 26 00:43:45 2005
15349 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15350 In-Reply-To: <web-13155717@cgp6.sentechsa.net>
15351 References: <20051125122850.19751D401C2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
15352 <web-13155717@cgp6.sentechsa.net>
15353 Message-ID: <b19eae4e0511260043r1fd6a1b7yf0950aa6559876a7@mail.gmail.com>
15354
15355 One (fun) problem with desynching like this involves CS MLOCK #foo +k
15356 foo -- if ircd thinks the channel isn't empty, but services does -- if
15357 you forget the password, you can no longer CS INVITE yourself past
15358 that key (least, I think that's the situation I encountered. Bans is a
15359 problem you'd have, also -- as well as mlocking +l and trying to CS
15360 INVITE past it.)
15361
15362 There is a way around all this (I'm working on it.. :p) but it
15363 involves fun fun fun source trickery in a module.
15364
15365 On 11/26/05, Kieron Thwaites <ron2k@webmail.co.za> wrote:
15366 > > Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join a
15367 > > channel?
15368 >
15369 > No, for reasons mentioned in the FAQ.
15370 > ___________________________________________________________________
15371 > For super low premiums, click here http://www.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm
15372 >
15373 > http://www.webmail.co.za the South African FREE email service
15374 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15375 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15376 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15377 >
15378
15379
15380 --
15381 --w00t
15382 From martin at rodecker.nl Sat Nov 26 08:20:51 2005
15383 From: martin at rodecker.nl (Martin Pels)
15384 Date: Sat Nov 26 08:21:30 2005
15385 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15386 In-Reply-To: <b19eae4e0511260043r1fd6a1b7yf0950aa6559876a7@mail.gmail.com>
15387 References: <20051125122850.19751D401C2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
15388 <web-13155717@cgp6.sentechsa.net>
15389 <b19eae4e0511260043r1fd6a1b7yf0950aa6559876a7@mail.gmail.com>
15390 Message-ID: <1133022051.4617.5.camel@manwe>
15391
15392 On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 19:43 +1100, w00t wrote:
15393 > One (fun) problem with desynching like this involves CS MLOCK #foo +k
15394 > foo -- if ircd thinks the channel isn't empty, but services does -- if
15395 > you forget the password, you can no longer CS INVITE yourself past
15396 > that key (least, I think that's the situation I encountered. Bans is a
15397 > problem you'd have, also -- as well as mlocking +l and trying to CS
15398 > INVITE past it.)
15399 >
15400
15401 That's not half as much fun as killing users with pseudoclients, or
15402 having services itself (not a pseudclient, but the actual server) join a
15403 channel.
15404 Yes, I have been playing with operserv raw too much ;-)
15405
15406 Never do these things on a production network of course :-P
15407
15408 > There is a way around all this (I'm working on it.. :p) but it
15409 > involves fun fun fun source trickery in a module.
15410 >
15411 > On 11/26/05, Kieron Thwaites <ron2k@webmail.co.za> wrote:
15412 > > > Also, is there any way to get the services, mainly Chanserv, to join a
15413 > > > channel?
15414 > >
15415 > > No, for reasons mentioned in the FAQ.
15416 > > ___________________________________________________________________
15417 > > For super low premiums, click here http://www.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm
15418 > >
15419 > > http://www.webmail.co.za the South African FREE email service
15420 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15421 > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15422 > > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15423 > >
15424 >
15425 >
15426 > --
15427 > --w00t
15428 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15429 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15430 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15431 -------------- next part --------------
15432 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
15433 Name: not available
15434 Type: application/pgp-signature
15435 Size: 189 bytes
15436 Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
15437 Url : http://lists.ircservices.za.net/pipermail/ircservices/attachments/20051126/fd820f78/attachment-0001.pgp
15438 From xxx.coder at gmail.com Sat Nov 26 19:19:29 2005
15439 From: xxx.coder at gmail.com (ongeboren)
15440 Date: Sat Nov 26 19:20:38 2005
15441 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15442 In-Reply-To: <1133022051.4617.5.camel@manwe>
15443 References: <20051125122850.19751D401C2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
15444 <web-13155717@cgp6.sentechsa.net>
15445 <b19eae4e0511260043r1fd6a1b7yf0950aa6559876a7@mail.gmail.com>
15446 <1133022051.4617.5.camel@manwe>
15447 Message-ID: <ce6d53600511261919w3fb33447k1d6a1470af54c80@mail.gmail.com>
15448
15449 I did it on a production network, just to prove the mortals a server
15450 can actually join a channel. The fun was twice as much.
15451
15452 Btw, just a small note about chanserv joining channels.
15453 People from my network (and me partially) are currently working on the
15454 ratbox (ircd-ratbox.org) support for ircservices. This ircd has a user
15455 flag +D, which is making the client deaf of what is happening in the
15456 channels it joins. Advantage of this umode is that it could be used
15457 for services that actually do join channels, so that the argument
15458 about the high traffic seems to loose its point.
15459
15460 On 11/26/05, Martin Pels <martin@rodecker.nl> wrote:
15461 >
15462 > That's not half as much fun as killing users with pseudoclients, or
15463 > having services itself (not a pseudclient, but the actual server) join a
15464 > channel.
15465 > Yes, I have been playing with operserv raw too much ;-)
15466 >
15467 > Never do these things on a production network of course :-P
15468 >
15469
15470
15471 --
15472 Evlogi Petrov - ongeboren@UniBG
15473 From surreal.w00t at gmail.com Sun Nov 27 03:06:17 2005
15474 From: surreal.w00t at gmail.com (w00t)
15475 Date: Sun Nov 27 03:06:24 2005
15476 Subject: [IRCServices] How to control the services?
15477 In-Reply-To: <ce6d53600511261919w3fb33447k1d6a1470af54c80@mail.gmail.com>
15478 References: <20051125122850.19751D401C2@sakura.ian-justman.com>
15479 <web-13155717@cgp6.sentechsa.net>
15480 <b19eae4e0511260043r1fd6a1b7yf0950aa6559876a7@mail.gmail.com>
15481 <1133022051.4617.5.camel@manwe>
15482 <ce6d53600511261919w3fb33447k1d6a1470af54c80@mail.gmail.com>
15483 Message-ID: <b19eae4e0511270306l3bbcec44m7ad4353ad8fa9305@mail.gmail.com>
15484
15485 Yeah, ircu (i believe), inspircd, and Unreal [those two *i know*] have
15486 support for a similar usermode.
15487
15488 It is doable, just not easily :p
15489
15490 On 11/27/05, ongeboren <xxx.coder@gmail.com> wrote:
15491 > I did it on a production network, just to prove the mortals a server
15492 > can actually join a channel. The fun was twice as much.
15493 >
15494 > Btw, just a small note about chanserv joining channels.
15495 > People from my network (and me partially) are currently working on the
15496 > ratbox (ircd-ratbox.org) support for ircservices. This ircd has a user
15497 > flag +D, which is making the client deaf of what is happening in the
15498 > channels it joins. Advantage of this umode is that it could be used
15499 > for services that actually do join channels, so that the argument
15500 > about the high traffic seems to loose its point.
15501 >
15502 > On 11/26/05, Martin Pels <martin@rodecker.nl> wrote:
15503 > >
15504 > > That's not half as much fun as killing users with pseudoclients, or
15505 > > having services itself (not a pseudclient, but the actual server) join a
15506 > > channel.
15507 > > Yes, I have been playing with operserv raw too much ;-)
15508 > >
15509 > > Never do these things on a production network of course :-P
15510 > >
15511 >
15512 >
15513 > --
15514 > Evlogi Petrov - ongeboren@UniBG
15515 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
15516 > To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
15517 > http://lists.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices
15518 >
15519
15520
15521 --
15522 --w00t