1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
6 <LINK REL=
"Index" HREF=
"index.html" >
7 <LINK REL=
"made" HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Is%20there%20a%20timeline%20in%20the%20future%20for%20supporting%20ircd2.9%20or%20greater&In-Reply-To=Pine.LNX.4.44.0208200711490.30115-100000%40linux.ircd-net.org">
8 <META NAME=
"robots" CONTENT=
"index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv=
"Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL=
"Previous" HREF=
"003069.html">
11 <LINK REL=
"Next" HREF=
"003072.html">
13 <BODY BGCOLOR=
"#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
</H1>
16 <A HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Is%20there%20a%20timeline%20in%20the%20future%20for%20supporting%20ircd2.9%20or%20greater&In-Reply-To=Pine.LNX.4.44.0208200711490.30115-100000%40linux.ircd-net.org"
17 TITLE=
"[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater">achurch at achurch.org
19 <I>Tue Aug
20 15:
21:
00 PDT
2002</I>
21 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"003069.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting
24 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"003072.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
26 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
27 <a href=
"date.html#3071">[ date ]
</a>
28 <a href=
"thread.html#3071">[ thread ]
</a>
29 <a href=
"subject.html#3071">[ subject ]
</a>
30 <a href=
"author.html#3071">[ author ]
</a>
35 <PRE>>><i> The WHY still remains the same, IETF-RFC should be the standard.
37 </I>><i>Guess who wrote those RFCs? IRCnet. Guess who pays attention to
38 </I>><i>them? no one.
40 Oh, was the message referring to the new RFCs? I don't consider them
41 "standards
" documents, though I have to admit it's nice they took the time
42 to actually document their modifications, unlike most other implementors.
43 (For those who were unaware, RFC1459, the original IRC specification, is
44 classed as an
"experimental
" protocol, so using the word
"standard
" to
45 refer to it is incorrect, but I think it's beyond question that RFC1459 is
46 more
"standard
" than the implementation of the day.)
49 <A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">achurch at achurch.org
</A>
50 <A HREF=
"http://achurch.org/">http://achurch.org/
</A>
58 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"003069.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting
61 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"003072.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
63 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
64 <a href=
"date.html#3071">[ date ]
</a>
65 <a href=
"thread.html#3071">[ thread ]
</a>
66 <a href=
"subject.html#3071">[ subject ]
</a>
67 <a href=
"author.html#3071">[ author ]
</a>