1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
4 <TITLE> AW: [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
6 <LINK REL=
"Index" HREF=
"index.html" >
7 <LINK REL=
"made" HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=AW%3A%20%5BIRCServices%5D%20Is%20there%20a%20timeline%20in%20the%20future%20for%20supporting%20ircd2.9%20or%20greater&In-Reply-To=20020805.16594859%40jgdpd012.gyn.jorlan.com.br">
8 <META NAME=
"robots" CONTENT=
"index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv=
"Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL=
"Previous" HREF=
"003030.html">
11 <LINK REL=
"Next" HREF=
"003032.html">
13 <BODY BGCOLOR=
"#ffffff">
14 <H1>AW: [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
</H1>
15 <B>Yusuf Iskenderoglu
</B>
16 <A HREF=
"mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=AW%3A%20%5BIRCServices%5D%20Is%20there%20a%20timeline%20in%20the%20future%20for%20supporting%20ircd2.9%20or%20greater&In-Reply-To=20020805.16594859%40jgdpd012.gyn.jorlan.com.br"
17 TITLE=
"AW: [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater">uhc0 at rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
19 <I>Mon Aug
5 19:
45:
01 PDT
2002</I>
21 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"003030.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
23 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"003032.html">AW: [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
26 <a href=
"date.html#3031">[ date ]
</a>
27 <a href=
"thread.html#3031">[ thread ]
</a>
28 <a href=
"subject.html#3031">[ subject ]
</a>
29 <a href=
"author.html#3031">[ author ]
</a>
36 though I am not an authority, I would say NO, because ircd2.10
37 and later is not designed to work with a services server
38 (and not SERVICE's which are a totally different kind),
39 because of the following:
41 - Lack of a global kline (akill would not work)
43 - Lack of services-savvy functions like (SVSMODE, SVSNICK)
44 - Lack of privilege level (like U:Line) so that certain clients
45 can do more (kill, mode, kick, topic) without having to join
48 Unless IRCnet coders start coding their ircd to support services,
49 I do not see any point in supporting that ircd, since the kludges
50 and hacks to accomplish those mentioned functionality would take
54 - Instead of Autokilling, services would need to continously send
55 KILL, and this would work as long as you configure your server
56 to allow remote KILLs.
57 - After a netjoin, a channel could have different topics the amount
58 of linking servers, and services would never notice it, and
59 it also would not need resetting topics.
60 - Services would even not see a netsplit happening, if:
61 bla.xxx.com splits from
62 hub.xxx.com but, hub.xxx.com represents themselves as
63 *.xxx.com and any server behind them is hidden from the
65 - Guest'ing would not work, since SVSNICK is not there.
66 - In order for ChanServ to MODE #channel +o nick, ChanServ should
67 join the channel, and become op by services server, and then
68 set op on another user
69 - The same for kick and topic.
71 Moreover, ircservices cannot be redesigned to work as SERVICE's,
72 because a SERVICE is not differentiated by name, but
<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">name at host
</A>,
73 and this would mean, that anyone could link up their NickServ
74 to the net as a service, and the best_service() thing from
75 IRCnet ircd would just choose ONE optimal choise for you, leading
76 to total inconsistency with registration/access lists, etc.
78 I am additionally not sure, whether IRCnets SERVICE's are allowed
84 PS: What is actually the main reason for you to use ircd2.10 or
85 later ? I ask just because of interest. (You can answer me
86 privately to this question, if you want)
88 ------------------------------------------------------------------
89 |
<i> Yusuf Iskenderoglu | You get to meet all sorts, |
90 </I>|
<i> eMail -
<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">uhc0 at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de
</A>| in this line of work... |
91 </I>|
<i> eMail -
<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">s_iskend at ira.uka.de
</A> | |
92 </I>|
<i> ICQ UIN :
20587464 \ TimeMr14C | |
93 </I>------------------------------------------------------------------
97 ><i> -----Urspr
üngliche Nachricht-----
98 </I>><i> Von:
<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">ircservices-admin at ircservices.za.net
</A>
99 </I>><i> [mailto:
<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">ircservices-admin at ircservices.za.net
</A>] Im Auftrag von
100 </I>><i> Frederico C Wilhelms Fred
101 </I>><i> Gesendet: Montag,
5. August
2002 19:
00
102 </I>><i> An:
<A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">ircservices at ircservices.za.net
</A>
103 </I>><i> Betreff: [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for
104 </I>><i> supporting ircd2.9 or greater
109 </I>><i> Is there any kind of timeline for supporting newer versions of the
110 </I>><i> ircd2.(
>9) ?
118 </I>><i> ------------------------------------------------------------------
119 </I>><i> To unsubscribe or change your subscription options, visit:
120 </I>><i> <A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo">http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo
</A>> /ircservices
130 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"003030.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
132 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"003032.html">AW: [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
134 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
135 <a href=
"date.html#3031">[ date ]
</a>
136 <a href=
"thread.html#3031">[ thread ]
</a>
137 <a href=
"subject.html#3031">[ subject ]
</a>
138 <a href=
"author.html#3031">[ author ]
</a>