]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blob - software/RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices/2002/002952.html
rename -> *.git
[irc.git] / software / RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices / 2002 / 002952.html
1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
2 <HTML>
3 <HEAD>
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] Another Feature Suggestion
5 </TITLE>
6 <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
7 <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Another%20Feature%20Suggestion&In-Reply-To=001e01c208a1%24bfede130%2468c1cf18%40c1065415b">
8 <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002949.html">
11 <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002953.html">
12 </HEAD>
13 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] Another Feature Suggestion</H1>
15 <B>Russell Garrett</B>
16 <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Another%20Feature%20Suggestion&In-Reply-To=001e01c208a1%24bfede130%2468c1cf18%40c1065415b"
17 TITLE="[IRCServices] Another Feature Suggestion">rg at tcslon.com
18 </A><BR>
19 <I>Fri May 31 18:13:01 PDT 2002</I>
20 <P><UL>
21 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002949.html">[IRCServices] Another Feature Suggestion
22 </A></li>
23 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002953.html">[IRCServices] Another Feature Suggestion
24 </A></li>
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
26 <a href="date.html#2952">[ date ]</a>
27 <a href="thread.html#2952">[ thread ]</a>
28 <a href="subject.html#2952">[ subject ]</a>
29 <a href="author.html#2952">[ author ]</a>
30 </LI>
31 </UL>
32 <HR>
33 <!--beginarticle-->
34 <PRE>&gt;<i> FloodServ - not only do floodbots flood but so do regular
35 </I>&gt;<i> users. I believe
36 </I>&gt;<i> this will help keep people from abusing channels when a
37 </I>&gt;<i> channel operator is
38 </I>&gt;<i> not there.
39 </I>
40 OK I see where you're coming from now, but this is requiring Services
41 to process every single line from every single channel, a not
42 insignificant load, and probably unreasonable for nets greater than
43 about 500 to 1000 users. Most (I'm tempted to say all ;) decent ircds
44 have flood protection built in. It's much more efficient to check it
45 at the ircd end than at the services end. It's also fallible - if
46 services is split, you've lost all protection.
47
48 &gt;<i> RoutingServ - mosty ircd's will autoconnect disconnected
49 </I>&gt;<i> servers but some
50 </I>&gt;<i> won't. I also like the idea of services being able to
51 </I>&gt;<i> re-rout servers if the
52 </I>&gt;<i> connection to a hub becomes laggy.
53 </I>
54 Also an advantage for smaller nets where you don't have a global oper
55 on hand all the time I suppose. I'm slowly warming to the idea :).
56
57 Russ Garrett
58 <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">russ at garrett.co.uk</A>
59 www.faereal.net
60
61
62 </PRE>
63
64 <!--endarticle-->
65 <HR>
66 <P><UL>
67 <!--threads-->
68 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002949.html">[IRCServices] Another Feature Suggestion
69 </A></li>
70 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002953.html">[IRCServices] Another Feature Suggestion
71 </A></li>
72 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
73 <a href="date.html#2952">[ date ]</a>
74 <a href="thread.html#2952">[ thread ]</a>
75 <a href="subject.html#2952">[ subject ]</a>
76 <a href="author.html#2952">[ author ]</a>
77 </LI>
78 </UL>
79
80 </body></html>