]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blob - software/RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices/2002/001332.html
rename -> *.git
[irc.git] / software / RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices / 2002 / 001332.html
1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
2 <HTML>
3 <HEAD>
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)
5 </TITLE>
6 <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
7 <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ChanServ%20OP/DEOP%20vs.%20access%20levels%20%28was%20Re%3A%20Services%20%204.5pre1%20released%29&In-Reply-To=">
8 <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002738.html">
11 <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002737.html">
12 </HEAD>
13 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)</H1>
15 <B>Dr. K. Hawkes</B>
16 <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ChanServ%20OP/DEOP%20vs.%20access%20levels%20%28was%20Re%3A%20Services%20%204.5pre1%20released%29&In-Reply-To="
17 TITLE="[IRCServices] ChanServ OP/DEOP vs. access levels (was Re: Services 4.5pre1 released)">k.hawkes at zombies.force9.net
18 </A><BR>
19 <I>Sat Feb 2 14:24:08 PST 2002</I>
20 <P><UL>
21 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002738.html">[IRCServices] Off topic
22 </A></li>
23 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002737.html">[IRCServices] [Suggestion for next versions] Topiclock and last channels
24 </A></li>
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
26 <a href="date.html#1332">[ date ]</a>
27 <a href="thread.html#1332">[ thread ]</a>
28 <a href="subject.html#1332">[ subject ]</a>
29 <a href="author.html#1332">[ author ]</a>
30 </LI>
31 </UL>
32 <HR>
33 <!--beginarticle-->
34 <PRE>[snip]
35 &gt;<i>
36 </I>&gt;<i> or founders could be more picky about who they give op status to. I dont
37 </I>&gt;<i> have enuff cpu for a program to compensate for a stupid founder :&gt;
38 </I>&gt;<i>
39 </I>&gt;<i> To deop, chanserv should only be concerned about if the issuer is an op
40 </I>in
41 &gt;<i> the channel he is attempting it in, just like a pc client works...
42 </I>&gt;<i>
43 </I>I second that, why should IRCServices compensate, if someone is +o they
44 should be able to -o regardless of Services' Access Levels, this would also
45 fit in with the behaviour of 4.3.3-4.4.8. No-one has really complained
46 about this, so why change it?
47
48 Just my 0.2p.
49
50 Quinn
51
52
53 </PRE>
54
55 <!--endarticle-->
56 <HR>
57 <P><UL>
58 <!--threads-->
59 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002738.html">[IRCServices] Off topic
60 </A></li>
61 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002737.html">[IRCServices] [Suggestion for next versions] Topiclock and last channels
62 </A></li>
63 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
64 <a href="date.html#1332">[ date ]</a>
65 <a href="thread.html#1332">[ thread ]</a>
66 <a href="subject.html#1332">[ subject ]</a>
67 <a href="author.html#1332">[ author ]</a>
68 </LI>
69 </UL>
70
71 </body></html>