1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices Coding] Fw: [Coders] RFCs and nicknames (Re: NS
5 LINK and NS SET PRIVATE)
7 <LINK REL=
"Index" HREF=
"index.html" >
8 <LINK REL=
"made" HREF=
"mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20Fw%3A%20%5BCoders%5D%20RFCs%20and%20nicknames%20%28Re%3A%20NS%0A%20LINK%20and%20NS%20SET%20PRIVATE%29&In-Reply-To=3d0fbe34.63102%40achurch.org">
9 <META NAME=
"robots" CONTENT=
"index,nofollow">
10 <META http-equiv=
"Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=us-ascii">
11 <LINK REL=
"Previous" HREF=
"000906.html">
12 <LINK REL=
"Next" HREF=
"000907.html">
14 <BODY BGCOLOR=
"#ffffff">
15 <H1>[IRCServices Coding] Fw: [Coders] RFCs and nicknames (Re: NS
16 LINK and NS SET PRIVATE)
</H1>
18 <A HREF=
"mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20Fw%3A%20%5BCoders%5D%20RFCs%20and%20nicknames%20%28Re%3A%20NS%0A%20LINK%20and%20NS%20SET%20PRIVATE%29&In-Reply-To=3d0fbe34.63102%40achurch.org"
19 TITLE=
"[IRCServices Coding] Fw: [Coders] RFCs and nicknames (Re: NS
20 LINK and NS SET PRIVATE)">griever at t2n.org
22 <I>Tue Jun
18 19:
50:
08 PDT
2002</I>
24 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"000906.html">[IRCServices Coding] Fw: [Coders] RFCs and nicknames (Re: NS LINK and NS SET PRIVATE)
26 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"000907.html">[IRCServices Coding] MemoServ not notifying BUG
28 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
29 <a href=
"date.html#910">[ date ]
</a>
30 <a href=
"thread.html#910">[ thread ]
</a>
31 <a href=
"subject.html#910">[ subject ]
</a>
32 <a href=
"author.html#910">[ author ]
</a>
37 <PRE>On Wed,
19 Jun
2002, Andrew Church wrote:
39 ><i> >On Wed,
19 Jun
2002, Andrew Church wrote:
41 </I>><i> >> Yeah, I checked the other supported servers and noticed that they
42 </I>><i> >> all support such nicks too... and to be honest I'm in full agreement with
43 </I>><i> >> Stskeeps that that part of the RFC (among others) is out of date; I just
44 </I>><i> >> wish there was something more up to date that everyone could agree on.
45 </I>><i> >> (Is this where someone jumps in and says
"if you want to get something
46 </I>><i> >> done, do it yourself
"?)
48 </I>><i> >> --Andrew Church
49 </I>><i> >> <A HREF=
"http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices-coding">achurch at achurch.org
</A>
50 </I>><i> >> <A HREF=
"http://achurch.org/">http://achurch.org/
</A>
52 </I>><i> >Well, if you read the RFC
55 </I>><i> >Because of IRC's scandanavian origin, the characters {}| are considered to
56 </I>><i> >be the lower case equivalents of the characters []\, respectively. This is
57 </I>><i> >a critical issue when determining the equivalence of two nicknames.
60 </I>><i> >So the original ircd considered {}|[]\ to be
"letters
".
62 </I>><i> *BZZZT* Nice try, thank you for playing. To quote RFC1459:
64 </I>><i> <nick
> ::=
<letter
> {
<letter
> |
<number
> |
<special
> }
65 </I>><i> <letter
> ::= 'a' ... 'z' | 'A' ... 'Z'
66 </I>><i> <number
> ::= '
0' ... '
9'
67 </I>><i> <special
> ::= '-' | '[' | ']' | '\' | '`' | '^' | '{' | '}'
69 </I>><i> In other words, a
"letter
" is really a letter from A to Z, and not one
70 </I>><i> of []\{}|. (It is true, however, that {}| and []\ were considered
71 </I>><i> case-insensitively equivalent.)
74 But in the finland alphabet, ae, slash-o, and the other thing ARE between
84 <LI>Previous message:
<A HREF=
"000906.html">[IRCServices Coding] Fw: [Coders] RFCs and nicknames (Re: NS LINK and NS SET PRIVATE)
86 <LI>Next message:
<A HREF=
"000907.html">[IRCServices Coding] MemoServ not notifying BUG
88 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:
</B>
89 <a href=
"date.html#910">[ date ]
</a>
90 <a href=
"thread.html#910">[ thread ]
</a>
91 <a href=
"subject.html#910">[ subject ]
</a>
92 <a href=
"author.html#910">[ author ]
</a>