]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
3bd189cb JR |
1 | <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> |
2 | <HTML> | |
3 | <HEAD> | |
4 | <TITLE> [IRCServices] Nickname access masks | |
5 | </TITLE> | |
6 | <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > | |
7 | <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Nickname%20access%20masks&In-Reply-To="> | |
8 | <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> | |
9 | <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> | |
10 | <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001820.html"> | |
11 | <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001823.html"> | |
12 | </HEAD> | |
13 | <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> | |
14 | <H1>[IRCServices] Nickname access masks</H1> | |
15 | <B>Strider</B> | |
16 | <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Nickname%20access%20masks&In-Reply-To=" | |
17 | TITLE="[IRCServices] Nickname access masks">strider at chatcircuit.com | |
18 | </A><BR> | |
19 | <I>Wed Apr 25 03:33:01 PDT 2001</I> | |
20 | <P><UL> | |
21 | <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001820.html">[IRCServices] Nickname access masks | |
22 | </A></li> | |
23 | <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001823.html">[IRCServices] Suggestions/SENDPASS | |
24 | </A></li> | |
25 | <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> | |
26 | <a href="date.html#1821">[ date ]</a> | |
27 | <a href="thread.html#1821">[ thread ]</a> | |
28 | <a href="subject.html#1821">[ subject ]</a> | |
29 | <a href="author.html#1821">[ author ]</a> | |
30 | </LI> | |
31 | </UL> | |
32 | <HR> | |
33 | <!--beginarticle--> | |
34 | <PRE>This does clear up some things. | |
35 | ||
36 | I agree with removing the access list but I also disagree. It would be added | |
37 | security for the user to be forced to identify, but many users prefer | |
38 | depending on the access list for security. Removing this feature would give | |
39 | services a tad less to do, which can be a lot less to do on larger networks. | |
40 | I really wouldn't mind seeing this feature go, but if I were to speak for my | |
41 | users, I would have to say keep it. By from my point of view, it isn't a | |
42 | hard adjustment, nor a huge change. | |
43 | ||
44 | Beau (Strider) Steward | |
45 | chatcircuit administrator and 6bit band member | |
46 | <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">strider at chatcircuit.com</A> www.chatcircuit.com | |
47 | <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">ircadmin at chatcircuit.com</A> irc.chatcircuit.com | |
48 | <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">strider at 6bit.net</A> www.6bit.net | |
49 | ----- Original Message ----- | |
50 | From: "Andrew Church" <<A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">achurch at achurch.org</A>> | |
51 | To: <<A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">ircservices at ircservices.za.net</A>> | |
52 | Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:28 PM | |
53 | Subject: Re: [IRCServices] Nickname access masks | |
54 | ||
55 | ||
56 | ><i> Okay, here's a combined reply: | |
57 | </I>><i> | |
58 | </I>><i> - I never liked SET KILL IMMED in the first place, and if I removed | |
59 | </I>><i> access masks then it would obviously go as well. | |
60 | </I>><i> | |
61 | </I>><i> - If IMMED is removed, of course Services would take care of changing | |
62 | </I>><i> IMMED settings to QUICK in this case--you may not have noticed, but | |
63 | </I>><i> I've had to do things like this for nearly every new version. (Take | |
64 | </I>><i> a look at the mess that comprises the database load routines to see | |
65 | </I>><i> what I mean.) | |
66 | </I>><i> | |
67 | </I>><i> - Point taken about people (and eggdrops) with static IPs who use | |
68 | </I>><i> access masks. I'll think about it. (I can see where making a bot | |
69 | </I>><i> identify to Services would actually hurt security...) | |
70 | </I>><i> | |
71 | </I>><i> - The whole POINT of a major version update is to change things. If | |
72 | </I>><i> you don't like the changes, stay with version 4.x, but then you | |
73 | </I>><i> won't get any updates (or possibly even bug fixes in the future). | |
74 | </I>><i> If you want the updates, get 5.0 and live with the changes, or | |
75 | </I>><i> patch them back the way you want--you have the source, after all. | |
76 | </I>><i> As for the "monkeys", I'm open to suggestions on how to make | |
77 | </I>><i> Services easier to use, but I think that's more of a client issue | |
78 | </I>><i> than anything else. | |
79 | </I>><i> | |
80 | </I>><i> --Andrew Church | |
81 | </I>><i> <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">achurch at achurch.org</A> | New address - please note. | |
82 | </I>><i> <A HREF="http://achurch.org/">http://achurch.org/</A> | メールアドレスが変わりました。 | |
83 | </I>><i> ----------------------------------------------------------- | |
84 | </I>><i> To unsubscribe, mail <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">ircservices-request at ircservices.za.net</A> | |
85 | </I>><i> with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject of the mail. | |
86 | </I>><i> <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices</A> | |
87 | </I>><i> | |
88 | </I> | |
89 | ||
90 | </PRE> | |
91 | ||
92 | <!--endarticle--> | |
93 | <HR> | |
94 | <P><UL> | |
95 | <!--threads--> | |
96 | <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001820.html">[IRCServices] Nickname access masks | |
97 | </A></li> | |
98 | <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001823.html">[IRCServices] Suggestions/SENDPASS | |
99 | </A></li> | |
100 | <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> | |
101 | <a href="date.html#1821">[ date ]</a> | |
102 | <a href="thread.html#1821">[ thread ]</a> | |
103 | <a href="subject.html#1821">[ subject ]</a> | |
104 | <a href="author.html#1821">[ author ]</a> | |
105 | </LI> | |
106 | </UL> | |
107 | ||
108 | </body></html> |