projects / irc.git / blame
| Commit | Line | Data |
|---|---|---|
| 3bd189cb JR |
1 | <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> |
| 2 | <HTML> | |
| 3 | <HEAD> | |
| 4 | <TITLE> [IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released | |
| 5 | </TITLE> | |
| 6 | <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > | |
| 7 | <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20Services%205.0pre9%20released&In-Reply-To=F30KneVHmNCZ2UkAXf20001359a%40hotmail.com"> | |
| 8 | <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> | |
| 9 | <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> | |
| 10 | <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001256.html"> | |
| 11 | <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001262.html"> | |
| 12 | </HEAD> | |
| 13 | <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> | |
| 14 | <H1>[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released</H1> | |
| 15 | <B>Andrew Church</B> | |
| 16 | <A HREF="mailto:ircservices-coding%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%20Coding%5D%20Services%205.0pre9%20released&In-Reply-To=F30KneVHmNCZ2UkAXf20001359a%40hotmail.com" | |
| 17 | TITLE="[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released">achurch at achurch.org | |
| 18 | </A><BR> | |
| 19 | <I>Thu Aug 15 21:58:44 PDT 2002</I> | |
| 20 | <P><UL> | |
| 21 | <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001256.html">[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released | |
| 22 | </A></li> | |
| 23 | <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001262.html">[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released | |
| 24 | </A></li> | |
| 25 | <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> | |
| 26 | <a href="date.html#1258">[ date ]</a> | |
| 27 | <a href="thread.html#1258">[ thread ]</a> | |
| 28 | <a href="subject.html#1258">[ subject ]</a> | |
| 29 | <a href="author.html#1258">[ author ]</a> | |
| 30 | </LI> | |
| 31 | </UL> | |
| 32 | <HR> | |
| 33 | <!--beginarticle--> | |
| 34 | <PRE> One of the main problems with allowing both is what you do when e.g. | |
| 35 | AUTODEOP is set positive and SECUREOPS is set, when NOJOIN is set higher | |
| 36 | than AUTODEOP, etc. Yes, I could write logic to handle all this, but that | |
| 37 | gets complex, and complexity leads to bugs. Negative access levels aren't | |
| 38 | used for anything else at the moment anyway, so I'd personally prefer that | |
| 39 | you got used to SECUREOPS and RESTRICTED instead. | |
| 40 | ||
| 41 | --Andrew Church | |
| 42 | <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices-coding">achurch at achurch.org</A> | |
| 43 | <A HREF="http://achurch.org/">http://achurch.org/</A> | |
| 44 | ||
| 45 | ><i>now a few people have appeared saying they use RESTRICTED and SECUREOPS.. | |
| 46 | </I>><i>chances are these may cause arguments.. granted, SECUREOPS and RESTICTED are | |
| 47 | </I>><i>just mass NOJOIN and NOOP some users would rather have them.. than having to | |
| 48 | </I>><i>set every nickname on the network to -1 and -100 on the access list :p | |
| 49 | </I>><i> | |
| 50 | </I>><i>i have a feeling there is gonna be a dispute over this.. possibly have the | |
| 51 | </I>><i>option to switch NOJOIN and NOOP as well as RESTRICTED and SECUREOPS off and | |
| 52 | </I>><i>on in the config file? means everyone who wants them.. can have them, and | |
| 53 | </I>><i>also saves arguments :) | |
| 54 | </I> | |
| 55 | </PRE> | |
| 56 | ||
| 57 | <!--endarticle--> | |
| 58 | <HR> | |
| 59 | <P><UL> | |
| 60 | <!--threads--> | |
| 61 | <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001256.html">[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released | |
| 62 | </A></li> | |
| 63 | <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001262.html">[IRCServices Coding] Services 5.0pre9 released | |
| 64 | </A></li> | |
| 65 | <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> | |
| 66 | <a href="date.html#1258">[ date ]</a> | |
| 67 | <a href="thread.html#1258">[ thread ]</a> | |
| 68 | <a href="subject.html#1258">[ subject ]</a> | |
| 69 | <a href="author.html#1258">[ author ]</a> | |
| 70 | </LI> | |
| 71 | </UL> | |
| 72 | ||
| 73 | </body></html> |