--- /dev/null
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Is%20there%20a%20timeline%20in%20the%20future%20for%20supporting%20ircd2.9%20or%20greater&In-Reply-To=Pine.LNX.4.44.0208200711490.30115-100000%40linux.ircd-net.org">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003069.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003072.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater</H1>
+ <B>Andrew Church</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.za.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20Is%20there%20a%20timeline%20in%20the%20future%20for%20supporting%20ircd2.9%20or%20greater&In-Reply-To=Pine.LNX.4.44.0208200711490.30115-100000%40linux.ircd-net.org"
+ TITLE="[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater">achurch at achurch.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Aug 20 15:21:00 PDT 2002</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003069.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting
+ ircd2.9 or greater
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003072.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3071">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3071">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3071">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3071">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>>><i> The WHY still remains the same, IETF-RFC should be the standard.
+</I>><i>
+</I>><i>Guess who wrote those RFCs? IRCnet. Guess who pays attention to
+</I>><i>them? no one.
+</I>
+ Oh, was the message referring to the new RFCs? I don't consider them
+"standards" documents, though I have to admit it's nice they took the time
+to actually document their modifications, unlike most other implementors.
+(For those who were unaware, RFC1459, the original IRC specification, is
+classed as an "experimental" protocol, so using the word "standard" to
+refer to it is incorrect, but I think it's beyond question that RFC1459 is
+more "standard" than the implementation of the day.)
+
+ --Andrew Church
+ <A HREF="http://www.ircservices.za.net/mailman/listinfo/ircservices">achurch at achurch.org</A>
+ <A HREF="http://achurch.org/">http://achurch.org/</A>
+
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003069.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting
+ ircd2.9 or greater
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003072.html">[IRCServices] Is there a timeline in the future for supporting ircd2.9 or greater
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3071">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3071">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3071">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3071">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+</body></html>
projects / irc.git / blobdiff