]> jfr.im git - irc.git/blame - software/!RELEASES/ircservices/achurch.org/services/lists/ircservices/2005/004864.html
RELEASE -> !RELEASE
[irc.git] / software / !RELEASES / ircservices / achurch.org / services / lists / ircservices / 2005 / 004864.html
CommitLineData
3bd189cb
JR
1<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
2<HTML>
3 <HEAD>
4 <TITLE> [IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
5 </TITLE>
6 <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
7 <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.esper.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ircservices%20should%20enforce%20%2BR&In-Reply-To=42249937.7030009%40comcast.net">
8 <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
9 <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
10 <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="004863.html">
11 <LINK REL="Next" HREF="004875.html">
12 </HEAD>
13 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
14 <H1>[IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R</H1>
15 <B>Medice</B>
16 <A HREF="mailto:ircservices%40ircservices.esper.net?Subject=%5BIRCServices%5D%20ircservices%20should%20enforce%20%2BR&In-Reply-To=42249937.7030009%40comcast.net"
17 TITLE="[IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R">medice at gmx.at
18 </A><BR>
19 <I>Tue Mar 1 09:11:30 PST 2005</I>
20 <P><UL>
21 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004863.html">[IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
22</A></li>
23 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004875.html">[IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
24</A></li>
25 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
26 <a href="date.html#4864">[ date ]</a>
27 <a href="thread.html#4864">[ thread ]</a>
28 <a href="subject.html#4864">[ subject ]</a>
29 <a href="author.html#4864">[ author ]</a>
30 </LI>
31 </UL>
32 <HR>
33<!--beginarticle-->
34<PRE>hm - I guess I should have understand that thing the other way round
35just at the first turn...
36I think your right, I got that idea wrong...
37In this case it's totally different story and worth a close
38consideration in my opinion.
39Sorry for any bad mood, in fact I was surprised first, since Dionisios
40usually writes perfectly reasonable stuff to the maillist and now i got
41him wrong - sorry
42
43greets Medice
44
45
46Bergee wrote:
47&gt;<i> Either I've misunderstood you and Dionisios K. or I think he meant
48</I>&gt;<i> something different from what you're talking about. I think he is
49</I>&gt;<i> suggesting that IRCServices should treat +R like it treats +A or +O.
50</I>&gt;<i> That is to say, right now, if a channel is +O then IRCServices will kick
51</I>&gt;<i> anyone that joins the channel that is not a global IRCop. So what I
52</I>&gt;<i> took his suggestion to mean is that he wants IRCServices to kick the
53</I>&gt;<i> user out of the channel if they don't have a registered nickname and +R
54</I>&gt;<i> is set on the channel.
55</I>&gt;<i> If this is indeed what he is suggesting, then I would say that it
56</I>&gt;<i> might be worth considering. I guess that's useful really in two
57</I>&gt;<i> situations. First if a user is the first one to join a channel and +R is
58</I>&gt;<i> mode locked on, because the IRCd would then not enforce +R because of
59</I>&gt;<i> course the channel did not exist at the time. Secondly I suppose would
60</I>&gt;<i> be on syncs from netsplits where one side did not have +R and say some
61</I>&gt;<i> spam bots managed to get in on on a split server. I guess in general I
62</I>&gt;<i> think it is worth enforcing the mode simply for consistency in
63</I>&gt;<i> IRCServices since +A, +O and +z on Unreal are already enforced.
64</I>&gt;<i> And if this isn't what you meant Dionisios, then I suggest what I
65</I>&gt;<i> thought you meant. What does everyone else on the list think of that? :)
66</I>&gt;<i>
67</I>&gt;<i> Bergee
68</I>&gt;<i>
69</I></PRE>
70
71
72
73
74<!--endarticle-->
75 <HR>
76 <P><UL>
77 <!--threads-->
78 <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004863.html">[IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
79</A></li>
80 <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004875.html">[IRCServices] ircservices should enforce +R
81</A></li>
82 <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
83 <a href="date.html#4864">[ date ]</a>
84 <a href="thread.html#4864">[ thread ]</a>
85 <a href="subject.html#4864">[ subject ]</a>
86 <a href="author.html#4864">[ author ]</a>
87 </LI>
88 </UL>
89
90</body></html>